Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAboutX-E-01 Strategic Planning Facilitator
City Council Memorandum
To: Mayor Fasbender & City Councilmembers
From: City Administrator Dan Wietecha
Date: March 20, 2023
Item: Strategic Planning Facilitator
Council Action Requested:
Select and approve hiring a facilitator.
Background Information:
Over the last year-plus, we have used a set of Strategic Initiatives as agreed priorities in order to
maintain focus and progress, drive accomplishment, and ensure regular tracking and reporting.
When the City Council approved the Strategic Initiatives in September 2021, they were expected
as a guide for the next year to year-and-half. As a matter of practical effect, we have wrapped up
that cycle and should begin the priorities of the next cycle. As a matter of timing, this matched
well with the November election and two new Councilmembers in January.
In January 2023, the City Council had general consensus that we should develop an updated set
of Strategic Initiatives this spring. The Council had several recommendations: not meeting by
Zoom, preferring a day-long retreat, and keeping “down time” brief if the work is done over a
series of meetings.
In February 2023, the City Council discussed a “blended” approach in between a streamlined,
goal-setting approach and a comprehensive approach. The Council had particular interest in
including some sort of “problem identification” in the process. This might be an environmental
scan, SWOT, tying to existing plans, and/or interviews with staff and Council. Council also had
a keen interest in the deliverables: report, implementation plan, and metrics to gauge progress.
I have solicited proposals from Chad Weinstein of Ethical Leaders in Action (who we worked
with for the prior Strategic Initiatives) and Craig Rapp of Rapp Consulting Group (who we’ve
X-E-01
worked with in the past for governance training and I currently work with in a leadership
development program).
Although there are relative pros and cons between each, either proposal would be an effective
approach to facilitating our strategic planning process this spring.
Financial Impact:
$18,000 to $19,500
Committee Discussion:
City Council discussion January 3 and February 21
Attachments:
• Ethical Leaders in Action – Proposal for Strategic Planning Facilitation
• Rapp Consulting Group – Strategic Planning Process
X-E-01
In House Project Focused Blended Comprehensive
Description: Sessions facilitated by
City staff, likely myself.
Expect this approach
would be “Project
Focused.”
Outside facilitator with
approach that
brainstorms potential
projects and key issues
then narrows to a
manageable list of
priorities for next 1-3
years.
Outside facilitator with
approach in between
Project Focused and
Comprehensive. For
example, identifying
what makes Hastings
distinctive instead of
going through a
mission/vision exercise.
Outside facilitator with
multi step approach
including mission/vision
and SWOT analysis to
identify priorities across
several timeframes (1-4,
5-9, and 10+ years).
Pros: • Little/no direct
budget impact.
• Staff more familiar
with City and topics
than an outside
facilitator.
• Anticipate quicker
process than other
options.
• Priorities will be
highly
implementable and
readily measured.
• Potential to have the
“best of both
worlds.”
• Identified priorities
may have greater buy-
in than in other
options.
• May include listening
sessions for
community input.
• May include
governance and team
building exercise.
Cons: • Limited staff
bandwidth.
• Limited capacity to
both facilitate and
participate in the
retreat.
• Facilitator not
budgeted, but likely
less cost than other
options.
• May be viewed
more as goal setting
• Facilitator not
budgeted.
• People may be
dissatisfied with a
“compromise”
approach.
• Facilitator not
budgeted.
• Takes longer than
other options,
potentially multiple
meetings.
X-E-01
Options for Approaching Strategic Priorities
• Philosophical
question of
overstepping City
Administrator’s role.
than as strategic
planning.
X-E-01
P.O. Box 14714
Minneapolis, MN 55414
www.ethinact.com
March 13, 2023
Mr. Dan Wietecha, City Administrator
City of Hastings
101 Fourth Street East
Hastings, MN 55033
RE: Proposal for Strategic Planning Facilitation
VIA EMAIL
Dear Mr. Wietecha,
Thank you for inviting Ethical Leaders in Action to facilitate strategic planning for the City of Hastings. This
document is offered as a proposal to do this work, engaging elected officials and staff in an efficient but
substantive process aimed at developing a shared understanding of your current situation and a set of strategic
initiatives to be pursued over the next 1-3 years, with clear objectives and performance indicators. Our aim will
be to develop realistic initiatives based on a thoughtful assessment of Hastings and its current situation, the
shared priorities of its elected officials, and the City’s capacity to implement strategic efforts alongside ongoing
municipal operations.
Project Approach Overview
As before, our approach will be iterative and collaborative. After introductory discussions at council and staff
meetings, we will conduct individual interviews with staff leaders and elected officials to develop a starting
point for a situation assessment and initial concepts for strategic initiatives. We will then facilitate a day-long
retreat with council and staff to solidify a situation summary organized by SWAT factors, and to draft strategic
initiatives at a high level. The outcome of the retreat will be a draft document, which we will complete with
additional input from staff, presented to Council in a second working session. Those efforts will provide the
input necessary for a final document to be presented at a final council meeting.
Project Tasks and Parameters
The following project plan is intended to describe the approach outlined above in more detail.
1. Initial Investigation
a. Preparation
i. ELA will meet with you to determine what documents and data would be helpful for the
team to review in preparation for interviews.
ii. ELA will introduce the interview process to a City Council meeting or work session (less
than 30 minutes) to provide a common foundation prior to individual interviews.
iii. ELA will draft interview guides for council interviews and for staff interviews.
X-E-01
Ethical Leaders in Action
Proposal to Facilitate City of Hastings Strategy Development
Page 2
b. Interviews
i. ELA will conduct individual interviews with the mayor, all council members, and staff
department heads. (30-60 minutes per interview)
ii. ELA will facilitate a discussion with staff department heads to obtain their overall input
into the City’s strategic situation and potential areas for strategic initiatives. (Two hours)
c. Documentation and Retreat Preparation
i. ELA will prepare an initial draft of preliminary findings to be used in a full-day retreat.
ii. ELA will develop an agenda and plan for the retreat and seek input from the mayor and
city administrator on the plan.
2. Council and Staff Retreat
a. Retreat Facilitation
ELA will plan and facilitate a full day retreat for elected officials and department heads or their
designees. (Approximately six working hours plus lunch and breaks.)
i. A draft SWAT analysis will be presented and discussed in detail.
ii. Candidate topics for strategic initiatives will be presented as a starting point for
discussion. These will be informed by the interviews and staff working session.
iii. Participants will generate their own set of topics and goals for strategic initiatives.
iv. A draft set of initiatives will be synthesized, with high-level objectives and other
parameters in preliminary form.
3. Synthesis and Presentation of Strategy
a. Plan Draft
ELA will prepare a full draft of the strategic plan based on the output of the retreat and present it
to staff for revision and additional input
i. ELA will gather staff input in a working session (Approximately 90 minutes.)
ii. ELA will work with individual staff members as necessary to document high-level
implementation plans and performance/achievement indicators.
b. Final Plan
ELA will prepare a strategic plan document and a PowerPoint summary of that document.
i. ELA will distribute the full document to Council and staff and use the PowerPoint to
present it to Council in a meeting for input (up to 90 minutes).
ii. ELA will make final revisions based on Council input and present it as a final document
at a council meeting (up to 30 minutes).
4. Project Deliverables:
a. Word-based Strategic Planning Document. This will be a compact version of a strategic plan,
including:
i. Description of planning process used.
ii. Situation summary organized as a SWOT analysis.
iii. Strategic objectives to be achieved, with rationale for each.
iv. Strategic initiatives with:
1. Tasks
2. Timeline
3. Resource estimates
4. Performance/achievement indicators
X-E-01
Ethical Leaders in Action
Proposal to Facilitate City of Hastings Strategy Development
Page 3
b. PowerPoint Summary of the strategic plan to guide final discussion with Council.
c. Process documents:
i. Interview guides
ii. First draft to inform retreat.
iii. Retreat agenda and plan.
iv. Draft strategic plan for staff input.
5. Summary of Staff and Council Time Commitments (consistent with the above plan).
a. City Administrator
i. Project oversight and input ad hoc throughout the process.
ii. Participation in Department Head efforts, below.
b. Department Heads
i. Individual interviews (1 hour per director)
ii. Staff Working Session 1 (2 hours)
iii. Retreat participation (8 hours)
iv. Staff Working Session 2 (1.5 hours)
v. Final one-on-one work to develop strategic initiatives (up to 2 hours for some directors)
c. Mayor and Council Members
i. Introductory meeting (30 minutes)
ii. Individual interviews (1 hour)
iii. Retreat participation (8 hours)
iv. Working Session review (90 minutes)
v. Final presentation (30 minutes)
Timeframe
We are prepared to kick off the project as early as April, 2023, and expect that the total project duration will be
12-16 weeks.
Project Staff
Charles Weinstein will be lead ELA’s team and will be primarily responsible for project delivery, including
primary session facilitation and primary authoring of deliverables. James Fischer will serve as co-facilitator and
will assist in synthesis of deliverables. Profiles for both are available at www.ethinact.com; more detailed
resumes are available upon request.
Fees
We propose a fixed fee of $18,000 for this project, which includes all professional labor including work already
completed prior to project interruption.
We propose to invoice the City based on the following schedule:
• $5,000 upon project kickoff
• $5,000 upon completion of the council retreat
• $8,000 upon your acceptance of the final project deliverable.
We ask that payment be due 15 days after receipt of invoice.
X-E-01
Ethical Leaders in Action
Proposal to Facilitate City of Hastings Strategy Development
Page 4
Conclusion
Thank you once again for your interest in re-engaging ELA as a resource for the City of Hastings. As before,
we are open to modifying our approach to best meet the needs of the City.
As noted in the above timeline, we are prepared to begin work on this project to prepare for an April kickoff
upon your written acceptance of this proposal (email will suffice).
Very truly yours,
Charles A. Weinstein, Ph.D.
President
Ethical Leaders in Action, LLC
X-E-01
1
STRATEGIC PLANNING
PROCESS
X-E-01
917 W. Washington Blvd. #280, Chicago, IL 60607
800-550-0692 | www.craigrapp.com
2
Rapp Consulting Group - Strategic Planning Process
The Rapp Consulting Group (RCG), and its principal, Craig Rapp, have conducted over 100
local government strategic planning engagements--over forty (40) in the past five years.
Primary clients are cities, counties, and special districts located in the Upper Midwest. The
collaborative process used by RCG results in clear priorities, focused objectives, and
targeted performance. This is accompanied by best-in-class stakeholder engagement, plan
implementation and performance reporting—facilitated by a team with decades of local
government and consulting experience.
Craig Rapp, President, Rapp Consulting Group
Craig Rapp is a nationally recognized speaker, facilitator, and strategic advisor. He speaks
and conducts workshops on subjects such as: leading in difficult political environments,
alternative service delivery, and authentic leadership. The focus of his consulting practice
is strategic planning, leadership development, and optimizing organizational
performance. Craig has over thirty-five years of experience as a senior executive in both
the public and private sectors. He was the Director of Consulting for the International City-
County Management Association, City Manager in three cities, Director at a regional
agency, and a senior executive in two privately held companies. He has a master’s degree
in public administration, a bachelor’s degree in urban studies, and is a graduate of the
Senior Executive Institute at the University of Virginia.
X-E-01
917 W. Washington Blvd. #280, Chicago, IL 60607
800-550-0692 | www.craigrapp.com
3
Rapp Consulting Group - Strategic Planning Process
The following description includes all components of the strategic planning process offered by the
Rapp Consulting Group. Not all components are included in every engagement. Final design
determined by the client.
Project Plan
STEP LENGTH OF TIME ACTIVITIES
Project Initiation 30-60 days Project planning, interviews,
senior management session
Environmental Scanning,
Stakeholder Engagement
75-90 days Environmental scan, stakeholder engagement;
Internal SWOT, Value Proposition
Data review, preparation 21 days Synthesis of scan and stakeholder data
Strategic planning 30 days Strategic planning sessions
(Data review session + strategy sessions)
Strategy implementation 45-75 days Management & staff sessions- initiatives, action
plans, performance management
Summary report 21 days Report preparation, presentation
Yearly Update (years 2+) 30 days each year Consultant-client review, strategy session
*Timeline is for illustrative purposes only. Some steps performed concurrently.
Strategic Plan Development
Project Initiation: Project planning, Governing Board engagement, kick-off meeting
Prior to initiating action, the consultants will review the results of the previous strategic plan to gain insight into
themes and current priorities of the organization. Following this, a project kick-off meeting with the Chief
Administrative Officer and the leadership team will be held for the following purposes: (1) verify expected
outcomes; (2) present an overview of the process; (3) review mission, vision and values to determine the need
for updating; (4) discuss & guide staff on environmental scanning and developing an organizational profile; (5)
clarify and finalize the details of the engagement process for the governing board, stakeholders and staff; (6)
review issues-including any unique challenges.
Interviews with members of the governing body will be conducted to introduce the consultant(s) and acquire
the perspective of the elected officials regarding the current environment, challenges and issues. A session with
staff at all levels will be held to explain the strategic planning process, what to expect, and how it fits into a
results-oriented management system. This meeting will also be used to describe the survey that will be
administered to employees and/or governing board to provide feedback into the strategic planning
process. Activities include:
a. Review previous strategic plan and performance results
b. Facilitate meeting with Chief Administrative Officer and leadership team
c. Prepare for and facilitate governing board & employee feedback (if included)
d. Summary of meetings—outline of process
X-E-01
917 W. Washington Blvd. #280, Chicago, IL 60607
800-550-0692 | www.craigrapp.com
4
Assess the Operating Environment
The first step in the strategic planning process is a review of the operating environment. This is accomplished in
three ways: (1) an Environmental Scan; (2) an Organizational Profile; and (3) a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses,
Opportunities, Threats) analysis.
Activity #1 – Conduct Environmental Scan
Under the guidance of the consultant, the client develops the environmental scan which is a systematic
review of major environmental factors affecting the organization’s operating environment such as:
financial and economic conditions, demographics, political and intergovernmental relations, citizen and
stakeholder issues, technology changes, environmental sustainability, and the regulatory environment.
a. Develop and distribute environmental scan documents
b. Provide staff support as required
Activity #2 – Develop Organizational Profile
An organizational profile is a baseline description of the organization prepared by staff with the
guidance of the consultant. It provides detailed information regarding the human and capital resources
of the organization and the strategic context for operations. Specifics regarding governance,
organizational structure, work processes, staff capacity and capabilities, and the strategic environment
are included. This serves as an on-going reference document for the board and leadership team.
a. Prepare and distribute guides/examples
b. Provide staff support, review as required
Activity #3 – Administer SWOT Questionnaire
A SWOT questionnaire is administered to all strategic planning participants. This provides a leadership
perspective on the current environment-both internal and external. The results are aggregated to
ensure anonymity and maximize candor. The data generated is delivered at the strategy retreat.
a. Prepare and distribute questionnaire
b. Summarize data
Engage the Community and Stakeholders
Concurrent with the environmental scanning effort, the consultant conducts a stakeholder engagement
process. This effort seeks to understand community needs and expectations, and determine whether the
organization’s mission, vision, values, and priorities are aligned with those expectations. The final elements and
specific format for this effort will be determined by the client and may include in-person and online facilitated
interactions with stakeholder groups.
Stakeholders are defined by the client, but generally include community groups and members such as: the
business community, schools, seniors, facility users/patrons, faith groups, historically underrepresented and
hard-to-reach populations. Optional approaches for gathering community input include:
• Focus groups—facilitated and conducted by the consulting team with groups identified by the
client. Sessions consist of 8-12 individuals from each of the selected stakeholder groups.
• Community forum(s)—facilitated community discussions conducted by the consulting team
using audience participation technology (APT). Participants vote anonymously via electronic
keypads, responding to questions relevant to the strategic planning process. Participation is open to
the entire community and/or by invitation as determined by the client.
X-E-01
917 W. Washington Blvd. #280, Chicago, IL 60607
800-550-0692 | www.craigrapp.com
5
• Online survey of stakeholders—these surveys can be focused on an array of external and
internal groups and/or the entire community. Administered by the consultants using POLCO© or
similar technology. Internal groups could include advisory boards or community leaders.
• Statistically valid resident satisfaction survey. This differs from the previous online survey
insofar as it relies on a methodology that assures high confidence of results and a validated margin
of error. The National Community Survey by POLCO© is used for this purpose.
All stakeholder engagement options include:
a. Discuss approach with client and project team
b. Prepare background materials
c. Conduct process with selected approaches
d. Summarize results
Determine Challenges, Priorities, Outcomes, Targets
Following completion of community engagement, the leadership group develops the plan, beginning with a
review of the information and feedback collected, followed by a retreat where strategic challenges are
identified, and priorities, outcomes and performance targets are determined:
Strategic Planning Session #1- Review Stakeholder Feedback, Scan, Profile
This session is held prior to the strategic planning “working sessions” (session 2, 3) and is dedicated to
reviewing the results of the stakeholder feedback, the environmental scan, and the organizational
profile. The consultant presents feedback results, and the staff presents the scan and profile. The
session concludes with a facilitated discussion amongst the governing board regarding issues raised.
a. Prepare and summarize data
b. Present to governing board
c. Facilitate discussion
Effective Governance Session
d. An interactive session for the elected officials, leadership team, and senior management team will be
conducted to familiarize the group with best practices in governance and create team cohesiveness.
Governance topics covered will include – roles and responsibilities, teamwork, candid communications,
handling conflict, understanding differences (using DiSC© profiles), and decision-making.
a. DiSC© Personality/Style Assessment
b. The DiSC© personality/style assessment will be administered to all participants. The results will be
used during the session to enhance understanding of style different and the impacts on team
cohesion and decision-making.
Strategic Planning Session #2- Examine Operating Environment, Identify Strategic Priorities (could be
combined with Session #3)
This session includes the governing board and leadership team and focuses on reviewing or confirming
organizational purpose, examining the operating environment, and establishing priorities. The group
addresses organizational value proposition, the mission, vision, and values, and updates them
accordingly. A facilitated process is held yielding a list of organizational challenges and a set of 4-6
strategic priorities. The group’s effort will be informed by the results of the community engagement
process and the information generated by the scan, profile, and SWOT questionnaire.
a. Develop meeting process
b. Review and integrate survey, environmental scan, profile, SWOT information
c. Facilitate session and group exercises
d. Summarize results
X-E-01
917 W. Washington Blvd. #280, Chicago, IL 60607
800-550-0692 | www.craigrapp.com
6
Strategic Planning Session #3 –Establish Desired Outcomes, Key Indicators, Targets (could be combined
with Session #2)
This session is dedicated to defining a set of outcomes, key performance indicators, and targets used to
establish accountability and achieve results. It may also address issues not completed at the previous
session. Using a facilitated process, the group determines a set of strategic priorities, then develops and
aligns outcomes and targets with the priorities.
a. Prepare background materials
b. Review previous session discussion/results
c. Facilitate session
d. Summarize results
Operationalize into a Work Plan
Following the development of a plan delineating outcomes and performance targets, the process moves to
implementation. Via facilitated process, staff from many levels develop strategic initiatives-the projects that
enable achievement of targeted performance. This is followed by creation of action plans—detailed steps
required to implement initiatives. To ensure accountability and transparency, the actions are tracked and
reported. This is done via an in-house process or via a software solution—determined by the client.
Strategic Plan Implementation—Develop Strategic Initiatives/Action Plans
This session is conducted with the staff at multiple levels across the organization. The session focuses
exclusively on developing strategic initiatives and detailed action plans for each strategic priority, in line
with identified outcomes and targets. Action plans need to be developed in sufficient detail to establish
accountability and make the effort real. The session includes a review of the strategic planning process
and guidance on action planning. If appropriate, it will also include initial exposure to the interface with
implementation software.
a. Meeting/discussion with CAO/Project Manager
b. Review previous session discussion/results
c. Prepare background materials
d. Facilitate session
e. Summarize results
Strategic Plan Implementation- Work Plan refinement and integration
This session is conducted with staff at multiple levels and focuses on refining the work of the previous
session to achieve integration of effort across service areas. It includes training on the interface with
implementation/dashboard software, if chosen. Performance reporting is presented along with forms
and/or software solutions.
a. Meeting/discussion with CAO/Project Manager
b. Review previous session discussion/results
c. Prepare background materials
d. Facilitate session/train employees
e. Summarize results
Strategic Plan Implementation- Work Plan finalization
This session is conducted with staff at multiple levels and will focus exclusively on final integration
issues related to action plans, vertical and horizontal coordination, timing of project deadlines, and
software input. This will include the review of staff work by the consulting team.
a. Meeting/discussion with Chief Administrative Officer or Project Manager
b. Review and feedback on staff work
c. Prepare background materials
d. Summarize results
X-E-01
917 W. Washington Blvd. #280, Chicago, IL 60607
800-550-0692 | www.craigrapp.com
7
Plan Updates, Continuation
Each year following initial plan adoption (Years 2-5), the consultant will work with the client to review and
update the plan.
a. Review strategic plan process, prepare background materials
b. Facilitate retreat
c. Summarize results
Options - Pricing
TYPE OF PLAN OPTIONS PRICE*
“Getting Organized” Plan
45-60 days
Online intake assessment, SWOT,
Strategy session, Initiatives advice, Report $12,500
Strategic Plan- Limited
60-75 days
Project planning, management session, SWOT, Strategy
session, Initiatives/Action Planning session, Report
$19,500
Strategic Plan for Operations
75-90 days
Project planning, leadership interviews, management
session, Environmental Scanning, SWOT, Focused
Community Engagement, Strategy sessions,
Initiatives/Action Planning sessions, Report
$27,500
Strategic Plan- Comprehensive
90-140 days
Governance session, leadership interviews,
management session, Environmental Scanning, SWOT,
Expanded Community Engagement, Strategy
sessions, Implementation-Alignment-Performance
management, Report
$35,000+ TBD based
on scope**
Strategic Plan- Transformational
120-180 days+
Governance session, leadership interviews, Initiation
session, Environmental Scanning, SWOT,
Comprehensive Community Engagement, Strategy
sessions, Implementation-Alignment-Performance
management, Software-enabled results tracking-
reporting, Report
TBD based on scope**
Strategy Update – Annual Client-consultant review of progress; SWOT;
Facilitated strategy session; Plan Update
TBD based on scope**
*Travel not included
**Final price dependent upon engagement methods chosen
X-E-01
917 W. Washington Blvd. #280, Chicago, IL 60607
800-550-0692 | www.craigrapp.com
8
Examples of Strategic Plans, Implementation
Examples of strategic plans, environmental scans, and do-it-yourself performance reports are available at:
Examples of Strategic Plans, Initiatives/Action Plans, and DIY Performance Reports
The Rapp Consulting Group has business alliances with POLCO© and Envisio©. They are best-in-class providers of
stakeholder engagement and performance management. An example of how Envisio’s software and dashboard
solutions are being implemented by a Rapp Consulting group City is found here:
City of Maplewood, MN https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=48vqbpOpNyo&t=0s
POLCO www.POLCO.us
Envisio www.envisio.com
https://www.envisio.com/envisio-public-dashboard
Clients
The primary clients served by Rapp Consulting Group are cities, counties, and special districts. The organizations
vary but are generally similar in size and complexity. The following are a representative sample of engagements
over the past five years:
STRATEGIC PLAN ENGAGEMENTS
City of Bloomington, MN
City of Blaine, MN
City of Shakopee, MN
City of Chanhassen, MN
City of Savage, MN
City of Northfield, MN
City of Prior Lake, MN
City of Richfield, MN
City of West St. Paul, MN
City of Waconia, MN
Village of Gurnee, IL
City of Lockport, IL
Village of Lombard, IL
Village of Lemont, IL
Village of Roselle, IL
Village of Glen Ellyn, IL
Village of Oswego, IL
Village of New Lenox, IL
City of Burlington, WI
City of River Falls, WI
Dakota County CDA, MN
Washington County CDA, MN
Lisle-Woodridge Fire District, IL
Roselle Park District, IL
Roselle Public Library District, IL
Oswego Public Library District, IL
Northfield EDA, MN
Lakeville EDC, MN
X-E-01