HomeMy WebLinkAboutComp and Class Overview 20220727Administration Committee
Comp & Class Study
July 27, 2022
Video Memo for Administration Committee Meeting July 27, 2022
1
Agenda
Overview
Implementation
Special Cases
Overview – Background on How We Got Here
Implementation
“Meat and Potatoes” of Today’s Discussion
Options and Recommendations
Special Cases
Not Quite Part of Implementation
But Still Important for Administration Committee to Consider
2
Overview
Goals of Study
Hired a Consultant
Study Process
Brief Recap
3
Goals of Comp & Class Study
Update City’s Compensation System
Competitive Wages – recruit and retain employees
Formalized Structure
Internal Consistency
Pay Equity Compliance
FLSA and ADA Compliance
Benefits and Policies
City Council and Mayor Compensation
City’s Last Comprehensive Study 1999-2000
City’s Last Significant Review 2006-2007
Very Tight Labor Market
Wages Cited as a Factor for Some Recent Employee Departures
Also Cited a Couple Times When Trying to Hire Someone
Compliance with State and Federal Laws
4
Hired a Consultant
Expertise
Hay Method
Pointing
Pay Equity
Greater Data Access
ERI Data
Benefits
Employee Bandwidth
Neutral Third Party
Much More than Just Pulling LMC Wage Data
Expertise, Efficiency, and Additional Data
Employee Bandwidth – Already 50-60 Hours
Neutral Third Party – Avoid Misperceptions of Favoritism
RFP
6 Responded
Hired Abdo Solutions
5
Study Process
Position not the Person
Job Descriptions
Hay Method
Know How
Problem Solving
Accountability
Special Conditions
Pointing
This is the Market
Market Data
Grades and Steps
Place Employees into the Market
No Loss in Pay
No Loss in Steps
Process Described Elsewhere
The Study Represents “This is the Market”
Initial Placement of Employees
No Loss in Pay
No Loss in Steps from Top End – Recognize Experience
6
Compensation Philosophy – Step & Grade
This Is What It Looks Like
Step and Grade Model
Market Data Determines Min and Max
Extremely Common in Public Sector
Hastings Has Used a Step System Since At Least 1999-2000 (over 20 Years)
7
Compensation Philosophy – Step & Grade w/ Employees
Hypothetical
Employees into the Market
No Loss in Pay
No Loss in Steps from Top End
8
Implementation
Step & Grade Plan
Compensation Philosophy
Union Negotiations
Budget Impact
Employee Communications & Listening Sessions
Implementation
Key Discussions About Compensation Philosophy and Budget Impact
9
Compensation Philosophy – Step & Grade w/ Employees
Same Base Chart You Just Saw
10
Compensation Philosophy – 5% over market
I’ve Heard Some Comments to Pay Above the Market Average
Here the Basic Structure is the Same, but the Numbers are 5% Higher
Advantages:
More Competitive Recruiting AND Retaining
Built In Cushion During Volatile Labor Market
Might Alleviate Concern about Employees Already Above Market
Disadvantages
Greater Budget Impact
Change from Previous Target of “At Market”
Tough to Later Say Target is “At Market”
11
Compensation Philosophy – Higher Starting Wage
Another Option Might Be to Cut the First Two Steps in Order to Have More Competitive Starting Wage
Here the Blue Circles Show Hypothetical Employees Moved Up to the New Step 1
Advantages:
More Competitive in Recruiting
Quicker Employee Advancement to Top End
Relatively Small Budget Impact
Incorporates Reality that Few Employees Currently Hired at Step 1 (Step G)
Disadvantages:
Some Compression Among Recent Hires – eg Someone Hired 2 Years Ago Still 5 Steps from Top End but Now On Same Step as a Brand New Employee
12
Compensation Philosophy – Fewer Steps
A Different Perspective on Six Steps is More Complicated
Again the Blue Circles Indicate Hypothetical Employee Changes from the Prior Base to this Model.
This Keeps the Market Min and Max, and Redistributes the Middle Steps
Advantages:
Quicker Employee Advancement to Top End
Disadvantages:
More Complex Initial Set-Up
Greater Budget Impact
13
Compensation Philosophy – Retroactive Pay
This is the Original Model Again
I’ve Heard a Couple Comments About Possibly Making Wage Adjustments Retroactive, Presumably to First of Year
Note: Budget Impact Discussed Later in Memo is Based on Retroactive to July 1
Advantages:
Right Now – Assume Full Budget Impact in 2023 Anyway
Disadvantages:
Much Greater (Double) Budget Impact (One-Time Expense)
14
Implementation – Union Negotiations
Police Officers
Police Sergeants
Already did 1% effective 7/1/2022, pending completion of Comp. Study
Firefighters
Fire Captains
Parks, Public Works, and Custodial
Union Wages Will Be Negotiated Separately
Reopeners Based on the Study and City’s Compensation Philosophy
15
Implementation – Budget Impact
Estimates (subject to change)
$ 343,767 half-year market (2022)
$ 687,534 full-year market (2023)
$ 37,500 additional steps in 2023
$ 21,751 COLA (3%) in 2023
$ 9,566 Longevity in 2023
$ 126,232 PERA and FICA in 2023
$ 882,583 TOTAL in 2023
$ 825K general fund and $58K utilities
What is City Council’s budget threshold?
Options for Phasing in Over 2-3 years?
With some very important clarification, the cost to implement the study is much more expensive than discussed at City Council last week.
We have budgeted $200K of ongoing funds toward implementation.
Unfortunately, the half year (July to Dec) in 2022 is around $350K.
And with a full year in 2023, the cost is almost $700K.
As a percentage of payroll, it doesn’t sound too bad at 7.6%, but it is a big number.
Plus adding on steps and COLA for a year later, plus PERA and FICA, bring the full year total to $882K.
Which brings us to 2 very important questions:
1 – What is the City Council’s budget threshold for implementation?
2 – What are options for phasing this in over the next 2-3 years?
Answering these questions will probably go beyond tonight’s meeting.
16
Implementation – Employee Communication
Status Updates at Key Steps
Involved in Job Description Review
Listening Sessions
Involved from the Start
Updates at Key Points in Process
Directly Involved in Job Description Updates
Intend to Hold Listening Sessions
Make Sure They Understand
Learn and Correct Mistakes
Not Just Somebody Unhappy
This is the Data
It’s About the Position in the Market, Not the Individual
17
Special Cases
Employees Already Above Market Rate
Highly Competitive Positions
Employee Benefits as Part of Overall Compensation Package
Mayor & City Council Wages
Not Part of Implementing the Step & Grade Model
But Important to Consider and Recommend
18
Special Cases – Employees Above Market
Freeze
COLA
Raise the Pay Scale Above Market Rates
More Frequent Compensation Review
Premise That No Current Employee Would See a Pay Cut Due to the Study
Handful of Employees are Actually Above the Top of Market
Tend to be in Lower-Mid Grade Positions
Obviously No Steps for Them to Advance
Some Cities Freeze These Positions – Essentially Waiting for COLA to Increase the Pay Scale for a Year or More Until It Catches Up with the Employee
Or, Some Cities Continue to Provide COLA, With the Thought that Over a Longer Horizon the Market Will Eventually Catch Up
Another Option, As Mentioned Earlier, Might Be a Compensation Philosophy Paying All Employees Above the Market Rate
This Would Reduce (Maybe Eliminate) the Gap an Employee is Above the Scale
Of Course, It is a Relatively Expensive Option Since it Increases the City’s Payroll Overall
Another Option Which Doesn’t Really Address It, Is to Simply Keep an Eye On It
Whether Freezing COLA or Allowing It for These Employees, More Frequent Review of Market Wages Can Make Sense
19
Special Cases – Highly Competitive Positions
Comp Study – Make Sure We’re Competitive in the Market
Signing and Retention Incentives
Potential Pay Equity Implications
More Frequent Compensation Review
A Goal of Comp Study is to Make Sure Hastings is Competitive in the Market
Very Tight Labor Market
Some Positions Highly Competitive
Some Cities Having Trouble Recruiting Positions – Raise Pay Rate, Signing Bonuses, Retention Incentives
Earlier This Year, Hastings Offered Signing and Retention Incentives for Building Inspectors
Potential Pay Equity Implications
Recognizing that the Labor Market is Extra Volatile Around These Positions, It Makes Sense for More Frequent Compensation Review to Keep an Eye on the Market and Maintain Competitiveness
20
Special Cases – Mayor & City Council
Statute requires ordinance to take effect after general election
Last updated 2014, effective Jan 2015
Tech Stipend should be incorporated in new ordinance
Discussed Dec 2021, Included in Study
State Law Requires Ordinance to Take Effect After General Election
Last Updated in 2015
Now Mayor $750 Below Peers and City Council $500 Below
Tech Stipend Should Be Included in Ordinance
21
Administration Committee
Comp & Class Study
July 27, 2022
22