HomeMy WebLinkAbout11/13/89Hastings Planning Commission
Meeting of 11/13/89
The regular meeting of the Hastings Planning Commission was
called to order by Commissioner Kaiser at 7:30 p.m.
Members Present: Commissioners Dredge, Ditty, Anderson, Zender,
Voelker and Kaiser.
Me~bers Absent: None.
Commissioner Featherstone arrived at 7:35 p.m.
Staff Present:
Planning Director Harmening, Planning Intern
Robertson
Commissioner Kaiser called for additions or MINUTES
corrections to the minutes of the meeting of
October ~23, 1989. There being no additions or
corrections the minutes were approved as presented.
Harmening indicated that Advanced
Homes of Hastings has requested approval of a
final plat called Riverwood Townhomes First
Addition as well as site plan approval for 8
townhome units. Last summer and fall Advanced
Homes of Hastings had received preliminary/
final plat approval for a single family townhouse
project called Riverwood 4th Addition. This
plat was approved with 22 single family homes
and 8 townhomes.
SITE PLAN/FINAL
PLAT-RIVERWOOD
TOWNHOME 1ST
ADDITION ADVANCED
HOMES OF HASTINGS
Harmening discussed with the Planning Commission
a variety of issues relating to the project.
After the discussion was finished a motion was
made by Commissioner Zender and seconded by
Commissioner Anderson to approve the site plan
and final plat subject to the following conditions:
A. That the deciduous shade trees be increased in
size from 1 1/4" to a minimum of 2".
B. As noted by the city Fire Marshall, future
construction on the subject property and in the
Riverwood area cannot run electrical service for
the construction site across roadways.
That the applicant shall provide the City of
Hastings with copies of the covenants and bylaws
for the townhouse development.
That the construction of the townhomes and related
site plan improvements shall be completed as per the
approved site plan. Occupancy of the townhome units
shall not take place until all site plan related
improvements have been completed. In the alternative,
occupancy of the units may be permitted if the developer
provides to the city, as per city code requirements,
a cash escrow in an amount equal to 125% of the cost
of the site improvements remaining to be completed.
That the developer complete the remaining required
improvements related to Riverwood 4th Addition this
year including the sidewalks and bituminous trail.
Upon vote taken, Ayes, 7; Nayes, 0.
Robertson indicated that Lawrence Construction
was requesting site plan approval for the
construction of two 12 unit condominiums on
Lyn Way. These buildings would be located just
north of a 24 unit condominium that was
constructed two years ago. In the fall of 1985
the city had approved a concept plan for the
area which called for the construction of a 30
unit condominium on the site. The applicant
proposed to modify this plan by reducing the
density and constructing two 12 unit structures.
SITE PLAN-TWO
12 UNIT CONDO
MINIUMS-880 LYN
WAY-LAWRENCE
CONSTRUCTION
Robertson discussed with the Planning Commission
a variety of issues including the recommendation
of the Engineering and Fire Departments that
watermains on the site should be looped and
tied in with the existing watermain to the
south. The parking lot and driveway areas should
be bounded by concrete curb and gutter and that
the applicant and staff and Waste Management
should meet to discuss recycling. After the
discussion was finished a motion was made by
Commissioner Ditty and seconded by Commissioner
Zender to approve the site plan subject to the
following conditions:
The Engineering and Fire Departments indicate
that the watermain on the site should be tied
in with an existing watermain to the south, with
the goal of eventually continuing the water line
north to the South Frontage Road thereby creating
a loop within the entire project. This would
provide higher water pressure, better water
quality, and improve fire protection capabilities.
The applicant should submit a revised utility
plan for city approval which illustrates the
aforementioned change.
B. The parking lot and drive areas are to be bounded
by concrete curb and gutter.
Ce
The proposed structures and accessory items such
as the parking 10t landscaping, etc., shall be
completed pursuant to the approved site plan. Upon
request for occupancy of any of the buildings, all
uncompleted items contained within the site plan
shall be addressed pursuant to the escrow requirements
contained in the site plan review provisions of the
city's zoning ordinance (Section 10.24).
Building plans shall meet fire and building codes.
Consideration should be given to sprinkling the
buildings.
E. That the applicant meet with City Staff and Waste
Management to discuss arrangements for recycling.
Upon vote taken, Ayes, 7; Nayes, 0.
Harmening indicated that Mr. Edward Robinson
is proposing the construction of a 13,688
sq.ft, retail/office building on the east side
of Vermillion Street directly south of Taco
Johns and north of Hardees. The proposed site
extends from Vermillion St. to Sibley St.
Mr. Robinson has made an application to the
city for approval of a rezoning/site plan
and parking variance. At this time the Planning
Commission is only being requested to order a
public hearing on the rezoning. No other
action is required of the Planning Commission
other than to provide comments on the proposal.
Harmening discussed with the Planning Commission
a variety of issues related to the project, the
site plan and the parking variance. There were
questions from Commissioners Kaiser, Voelker and
Dredge to Mr. Edward Robinson about various
aspects of his plan. Commissioner Voelker asked
Harmening to seek Engineering opinions of the
effect of the office/retail building on Sibley
Street particularly with regard to access,road
capacity and through traffic.
ORDER PUBLIC
HEARING-SITEPLAN
VARIANCE/REZONING
R-3 TO C-3RETAIL
/OFFICE BUILDING,
1225 VERMILLION
ST.-ED ROBINSON
After considerable discussion a motion was made
by Commissioner Ditty, seconded by Commissioner
Zender to order a public hearing for the Commissions
11/27/89 meeting at 7:30 p.m.
Upon vote taken, Ayes, 7; Nayes, 0.
Harmening indicated that Mike Gegan,
two buildings at 205 & 211 E. 3rd Street is
requesting approval of a minor subdivision to
divide into two pieces a parcel of property
upon which two existing buildings are located.
The property in question is located just east of
the intersection of 3rd St. & Sibley Street.
The property contains two apartments in one
building and a pool hall in the other building
and is located in a C-3 zone. The proposed
parcels of property meet the minimum size standards
of a C-3 zone. Harmening discussed several
issues with the Planning Commission related to
this project particularly the need for separate
sewer and water services and the fact that
both buildings appear to encroach approximately
one foot into the Third Street right of way.
This would require the applicant to initiate
a street vacation proceding to clear up this
encroachment. There being no discussion there
was a motion by Commissioner Dredge, seconded
by Commissioner Voelker to order a public
hearing for the Planning Commission meeting of
November 27, 1989 at 7:30 p.m.
the owner of ORDER PUBLIC
HEARING--MINOR
SUBDIVISION -
205 & 211 E.3RD
ST.-MIKE GEGAN
Upon vote taken, Ayes, 7; Nayes, 0.
Harmening indicated that there was an
application for a minor subdivision to resolve
the encroachment of a garage of one property
located at 1810 Eddy St. upon the property
just to the north of 1802 Eddy St.
ORDER PUBLIC
HEARING-MINOR
SUBDIVISION -
1802 EDDY ST.
There being no discussion a motion was made
by Commissioner Zender, seconded by Commissioner
Dredge to order a public hearing on the matter
for the Planning Commission meeting of November
27, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. Upon vote taken, Ayes,
7, Nayes, 0.
Harmening discussed with the Planning Commission
the fact that the regular date for the second
Planning Commission meeting in December falls
on Christmas Day. Since no one wanted to have
the meeting on Christmas Day there was
considerable discussion of an alternative date.
Several members of the Planning Commission felt
that there was a possibility that a second
Planning Commission meeting in December would
not be needed. They agreed to examine this
matter again at the first scheduled meeting in
December on Monday, December llth. A motion was
made by Commissioner Voelker and seconded by
Commissioner Anderson to hold the second
SCHEDULING OF
DECEMBER PLANNING
COMMISSION
MEETING
needed, on Tuesday, December 26th. Upon vote
taken, Ayes, 7; Nayes, 0.
Harmening updated the Planning Commission
about recent actions taken by the City Council.
The Planning Commission agreed to interview
candidates for vacant Planning Commission seats
on December 11, 1989.
There being no further business a motion was
made by Commissioner Dredge, seconded by
Commissioner Voelker to adjourn the meeting
at 8:13 p.m. Upon vote taken, Ayes, 7; Nayes, 0.
UPDATES/OTHER
BUSINESS
ADJOURNMENT