Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07/22/91 Hastings Planning Commission Minutes of July 22, 1991 The regular meeting of the Hastings Planning Commission was called to order by Commissioner Reinardy at 7:02 p.m. Commissioners Present: commissioners Anderson, Dredge, Reinardy, Zender, Featherstone and Mesaros Commissioners Absent: Commissioner Patzke Staff Present: city Planner Czech Commissioner Reinardy called for additions or MINUTES corrections to the minutes of the regular meeting of July 8, 1991. There being no additions or corrections to the minutes, the minutes were approved. Czech reviewed staff's June 28, 1991, memorandum to VARIANCE- the Planning commission concerning a request by Fritz 401 RAMSEY and Marge Beissel for approval of a variance to expand ST.-BEISSEL a non-conforming front yard and side corner setback so they may add a deck onto the west (front) and north (corner) sides of an existing structure at 401 Ramsey Street such that the front setback of the existing~ structure which is currently fifteen and one half feet line would be twelve feet from the front property after construction of a new deck and the side corner setback which is currently six feet would be extended but would remain six feet from the corner/north property line. Fritz Beissel of 401 Ramsey Street was present at the meeting and explained to the Planning Commission why he wanted to build a new deck. Commissioner Patzke joined the meeting at 7:06 p.m. The Planning Commission discussed at length whether the proposed variance complied with city code criteria. Commissioner Dredge moved, Commissioner Anderson made a second, to approve the variance request based on findings that the applicant would receive the same privileges as surrounding structures, that an existing retaining wall does not present a hazard and will protect the property, that Ramsey Street is a one way street and no vehicles on the right-of-way will be effected by the addition with approval subject to the following condition that the applicant must construct the deck within one year after receiving approval by the city. Upon vote taken, Ayes, 5; Nays, 2 (Mesaros and Zender) Czech reviewed staff's July 18, 1991, memorandum to PUBLIC the Planning Commission concerning a request by HEARING- siewert Construction for approval of a final plat for FINAL PLAT- approximately 28 acres of land which includes a 20 PLEASANT unit townhome development. Czech noted that the VALLEY 6TH applicant has not submitted the required street/utilityADDITION plans and recommended that the application be tabled SIEWERT until such time that the applicant submits the required street and utility plans. Czech also noted that a site plan approval is required for a townhome development in addition to the final plat prior to building permits being issued. Commissioner Zender moved, Commissioner Patzke made a second, to table the public hearing for the Pleasant Valley 6th Addition Final Plat until such time that the applicant submits the required street and utility plans. Upon vote taken, Ayes, 7; Nays, O. The Planning Commission discussed the need for UPDATE/ developing separate ordinance requirements for setbacksOTHER in the "old" part of town. Commissioner Zender moved, BUSINESS Commissioner Dredge made a second, to request that the city Council direct interested members of the Planning Commission and city Council to review and make changes to the city Code regarding setbacks for precode structures. On vote taken, Ayes, 7; Nays, 0. Czech reviewed staff's July 22, 1991, memorandum to the Planning Commission concerning a request by Edward Robinson for a rezone from R-3/C-3 to R-2 for a portion of property at 1225 Vermillion Street. Commissioner Zender moved, Commissioner Dredge made a second, to order a public hearing in order to consider the proposed rezone for the Planning Commissions August 12, 1991, meeting at 7:00 p.m. Upon vote taken, Ayes, 7; Nays, 0. Czech reviewed staff's July 18, 1991, memorandum to the Planning Commission concerning future Planning Commission terms which included three options for coordinating vacant and soon to be vacant terms. The Planning Commission discussed each option. Commission Zender moved, Commissioner Anderson made a second, to recommend to the city Council that Option 1 as spelled out in staff's July 18, 1991, memorandum be chosen for coordinating future Planning Commission terms which provides for nine members serving a maximum of three two year te~ms. Upon vote taken, Ayes, 6; Nays, 1 (Patzke). There being no further business, Commissioner Zender moved, Commissioner Patzke made a second to adjourn the meeting at 7:55 p.m. AD3OURNMENT