HomeMy WebLinkAbout20191218 - Packet
December 18, 2019
OPERATIONS COMMITTEE MEETING
PRESENTED INFORMATION WITH FOLLOW UP
NOTES & ACTIONS
This will be
Superintendent Peine, City Engineer Stempski, and Assistant City Engineer Caven
City Administrator Wietecha, PW Director Egger, PW
no time remaining.
1208 Tyler Street
2020 Neighborhood Infrastructure Improvements
Committee Chair Lund & Councilmember Vaughan
brought forward at future meeting.
–
–
Preliminary Project Schedule
Old Mill Court Pavement Issues
Proposed Assessment Rates
McCoy Water Service Repair
Andy & Stan McCoy
Project Scope
In Attendance:
Agenda
–
–
Public Present
Staff Present
¤¤¤
¨¨¨
City took action when clear evidence of leak was presenting itself. Contractors are busy and their arrival is not always
Owner did have opportunity to seek out contractor to perform exploratory excavation and repair after being notified
performed repair then, eliminating need for some amount of street patch costs and possibly utility contractor overtime.
Owner asserting City could have performed additional leak detection before pavement mill and overlay project and
In attempt to confirm location, City leak detection vendor brought back to area. Detection was inconclusive whether
1208 Tyler Street
Ordinance, Chapter 51.05D
at the optimal time of the client’s choosing, and leaving the leak persist risks other infrastructure damages.
Service line leak suspected in 2017 after Citywide leak detection survey.
Invoices sent to owner. Owner contests costs for overtime hours by utility
Excavation confirms ¼” hole had developed on copper service line a
is commensurate with other underground utility repairs for service or mainline failures.
elects to have contractor perform exploratory
opportunity to be present on site during repairs.
City
leak was on the service line or the main line. Excavation was only way to confirm.
Sewer and Water Services are responsibility of property that they serve per
Leak presented with water coming to surface in fall 2019.
Owner notified and City indicated that expenses would be billed to owner.
repairs contractor, and some cost of paving patch work.
–
McCoy Water Service Repair
provided notice and given
Owner notified. No action taken.
few feet out from main.
in 2017 of potential leak.
City
repair work.
-
Time of essence
Owner
Cost
and
¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤
¨¨¨¨¨
item returning to the Committee’s agenda at its next meeting, which will likely
City staff. There was a desire to understand what the
and that there should also be some reduction of pavement patching costs. In
their view, the work could have been performed before the mill and overlay
would like for the overtime costs from the utility repair crew to be dropped,
Committee members expressed a desire for additional information breaking
down the value of the McCoy’s requested reductions. Staff anticipates this
McCoy’s detailed request was, and the McCoy family indicated that they
project and therefore no cost for the second and final layer of pavement
The Committee members asked several questions of the McCoy family
reached, and the
decision was
Committee Discussion Summary
would have been necessary. No formal
f
o
be in February 2020.
representatives and
¨
Street)
th
Area 1 (15
–
Street Improvements
West of Vermillion
–
Street Improvements
East of Vermillion
–
Street Improvements
Street W
th
15
–
Utility Improvements
Street E
th
15
–
Utility Improvements
Area 2 (Cannon Area)
–
Street Improvements
Cannon Area
–
Utility Improvements
Sanitary Sewer Replacement
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
Sanitary Sewer Lining Operation
Water System Replacement
Storm Sewer Extension
reasonably comparable and fair given lot size differences
Standard lot assessment is rate x property frontage
to make
Collector roads assessed at 25% of the estimated
Calculated against a “standard” adjacent lot
project cost (street, sidewalk, storm)
Rate x 25% of length of long side
Rate x length of short side
Irregular shaped lots
Assessment Policy
along street
Corner Lots
¤¤¤
¨¨¨¨
Cemetery properties under analysis by Appraiser
Partial Reconstruction (Commercial) = $78.18/FF
Family & Apartment = $56.70/FF
Area 2 (local streets to be reclaimed)
Recommended Assessment Rates
Reconstruction = $54.64/FF
Twin Home = $66.60/FF
Area 1 (collector road)
-
Single
¤¤¤¤¤
¨¨
Residential = $1,600 to $13,200 (highest amounts are
Assessments as Percentage of Bonded Debt ~ 38%
Commercial = $800 to $11,300 (based on frontage)
wide lots)
wide lots/large acre lots)
Institutional = $7,200 per lot (United Methodist)
-
Total Assessment Revenue = $765,700
Residential = $1,600 to $7,200 (double
Recommended Assessment Rates
Commercial = $9,700 to $20,600
-
for corner lots/double
Area 1 Ranges
Area 2 Ranges
¤¤¤¤¤
¨¨¨¨
Wide” Lot Width
-
“Double
“Irregular” Lot Analysis
20’
January 21
City Council is provided transcript of comments
received & staff responses shortly thereafter
February 3
–
Neighborhood Open House Meeting
Schedule (subject to adjustment)
October
–
April 6
Feasibility Report Submitted
May
March 2
–
Construction Complete
and 23 (location TBD)–
–
April 8
Assessment Hearing
Construction Starts
–
Public Hearing
–
Open Bids
¤
¨¨¨¨¨¨¨
throughout the corridor. On the east side of Vermillion Street, sidewalks will be by Hosch Appraisal & Consulting for the cemetery lots owned by Elizabeth Ann
0). Appraisal analysis currently ongoing
stream on this project. The street will be narrowed, but still allows for parking
Street to be constructed at 36’ wide (from face of curb to face of curb). The
th
Committee members supported the scope of improvements. Specifically, 15
compliant sidewalk will be placed on the south side
The Operations Committee motioned to support the proposed assessment
Seaton Church along Cannon Street. Results of these assessments will be
width meets State Aid minimums, which allows for an additional funding
shared with the committee members when available.
Committee Discussion Summary
–
methodology and amounts (passed 2
placed on both sides of the street.
-
on both sides. An ADA
¨¨