The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About04-02-01 CITY OF HASTINGS COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M. DATE: Monday April 2, 2001 I. CALL TO ORDER: II. ROLL CALL: III. DETERMINATION OF QUORUM: IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 19, 2001 V. COUNCIL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED: VI. CONSENT AGENDA: The items on the Consent Agenda are to be acted upon by the City Council in a single motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the items will be removed from the Consent Agenda to the appropriate department for discussion. 1. Pay All Bills As Audited 2. Appointments to Heritage Preservation Commission 3. Pay Estimate #4, Repainting 4th Street Elevated Water Storage Tank, Champion Coatings, Inc., $5,950 4. Resolution-Authorizing Media One of the Upper Midwest to Temporarily Operate the Cable Communications System 5. Resolution-UMinnesota Cities: Building Quality Communities" 6. Resolution-Support for Legislation Directing the Department of Administration to Adopt a Building Code for Rehabilitation of Historic Structures 7. Declare Excess Property for City Auction Saturday, May 5th, 2001 8. Resolution-Approving One-Day Gambling Permit for Jack J. Jorgensen Charitable Trust for July 23, 2001 9. Approval of Transfer of Amusement Device License-Pizza Hut VII. AWARDING OF CONTRACTS & PUBLIC HEARING: Hearing-Pawn Shop License VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY STAFF: A. Public Works B. City Planner 1. First Reading/Order Public Hearing - Chapter 4 Construction Regulations (Section 4. 15-Accessory Structures) 2. First Reading/Order Public Hearing - Chapter 4 Construction Regulations (Amending Section 4.03-Certificate of Survey; Amending Section 4.04-Certificate of Occupancy; Adding Section 4. 16-Erosion Controls; Adding Section 4.17 -Survey Inspections; Adding Section 4.18-Street Sweeping; Adding Section 4.19-Trash and Debris) 3. First Reading/Order Public Hearing - Chapter 11 Subdivision Ordinance (Repealing and Replacing Section 11.01 - 11.06) 4. EAW Distribution - South Pines IV C. Administrator 1. Action--Pawn Shop License Review 2. 1st Reading and Schedule Public Hearing: Ordinance Repealing Section 1306 of State Building Code 3. Establish Committee to Review Certain Fire and Building Code Regulations IX. COMMENTS FROM AUDIENCE: X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS: XI. NEW BUSINESS: XII. REPORTS FROM CITY COMMITTEES, OFFICERS, COUNCILMEMBERS: XIII. ADJOURNMENT: Next Regular City Council Meeting on Monday, April 16, 2001 Hastings, Minnesota March 19,2001 The City Council of the City of Hastings, Minnesota met in a regular meeting on Monday, March 5, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 101 4th Street East, Hastings, Minnesota Members Present: Councilmembers, Schultz, Hazlet, Hicks, Riveness, Yandrasits & Moratzka Mayor Werner Members Absent: None Staff Members Present: Dave Osberg, City Administrator; Shawn Moynihan, City Attorney; Marty McNamara, Parks & Recreation Director Darbie Johnson, Aquatics Center Manager Mark Holmes, Fire Chief and Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk Approval of Minutes Mayor Werner asked if there were any corrections or additions to the minutes of the regular meeting of March 5, 2001 and hearing none the minutes were approved as presented. Consent Agenda Councilmember Riveness requested that Items 3 & 4 be moved for discussion under Administrator. Moved by Councilmember Yandrasits, seconded by Councilmember Riveness, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. 7 Ayes; Nays, None. 1. All Bills As Audited 2. Utility Billing-Request for Waiver of a Penalty 3. Approve Quote Award for Fire Department % ton Pickup Truck-Moved to Administrator 4. Request Authorization for Fire Department Training Fund-Moved to Administrator Presentation-Skateboard Park Dennis McNamara, chair of the skateboard committee, was present to discuss the recommendations of the committee and to request Council support. McNamara stated that the proposed Skateboard Park would be located in the Industrial Park and will have a capacity of between 50-60 people. The total costs being requested by Council is $100,000, to be used from the Unallocated Park Dedication Fund, to be replaced in the 2002 budget. Minutes ofthe Regular Meeting of March 19,2001 Page 2 of3 Moved by Councilmember Moratzka, seconded by Councilmember Hicks, to approve the skateboard park proposal as presented. 7 Ayes; Nays, None. Review Code Requirements Moved by Councilmember Schultz, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka, to direct the Operations Committee to discuss code requirements in regards to sprinkler requirements. 7 Ayes; Nays, None. Approve Quote Award for Fire Department % Ton Pickup Truck Councilmember Riveness asked if the City could donate the City's current vehicle instead of accepting the proposed trade-in. Fire Chief Holmes stated that the vehicle being replaced is not in good condition. Moved by Councilmember Hazlet, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to approve the quote for the Fire Department % Ton Pickup Truck as presented. 7 Ayes; Nays, one. Councilmember Riveness voting against. Request Authorization for Fire Department Training Fund Fire Chief Holmes stated that this request is in response to OSHA training requirements . Moved by Councilmember Hazlet, seconded by Councilmember Yandrasits, to approve as presented. 7 Ayes; Nays, None. Discussion of Flood Preparation Staff was directed to work with the City's insurance agency and to prepare a report for the April 2, 2001 Council meeting. Temporary Reclassification Moved by Councilmember Yandrasits, seconded by Councilmember Riveness, to direct staff to prepare a policy to address temporary position reclassifications and to authorize the temporary reclassification of Assistant Finance Director Char Stark. 7 Ayes; Nays, None. City Hall Security Administrator Osberg recommended that the compensation for reserve police officers be adjusted from $10.00 to $15.00/hour with a three"hour minimum and that the City Hall Meeting Room Rental Room Rate be adjusted to $25.00/hour with a three-hour mrmmum. Moved by Councilmember Schultz, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka, to adjust the reserve police officer rate to $15.00/hour with a two-hour minimum and to adjust the City Hall Meeting Room Rental Rate to $25.00/hour with a two-hour minimum. Additional hours, or portion of hours, to be charged $25.00/hour. 7 Ayes; Nays, None. Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 19,2001 Page 3 of 3 Adjournment Moved by Councilmember Yandrasits, seconded by Councilmember Riveness, to adjourn the meeting at 8:15 p.m. 7 Ayes; Nays, None. Mayor ATTEST City Clerk Date: 03/29/2001 Time: 14:42:22 Operator, BECKY KLINE Page: 1 VI-1 CITY OF HASTINGS PM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Department Vendor Name Description Amount COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 1 IISTRATION ADM.iNISTRATION CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY CLERK FINANCE FINANCE FINANCE cr ~CILITIES CI'I'J,. .eACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES CITY FACILITIES BDM CONSULTING ENGIN ENGINEERING MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM Total for Department MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM Total for Department 6011 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY OF HASTINGS PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT CORPORATE EXPRESS OFF SUPPLIES CRAGUN'S CONFERENCE ANNUAL CONFERENCE FARMER BROS CO. SUPPLIES PORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM NEXTEL COMMUNICATION 2/19 ~ 3/18 OSBERG. DAVID M. DONUTS MEETING Total for Department 6020 FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN HASTINGS STAR GAZETT CONSTRUCTION REGS HUMAN RESOURCES COliN CONFERENCE MESKO, MELANIE EXPENSES MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM SCHROEDER, ADELINE MILEAGE Total for Department 6040 FORTIS BENEFITS INS FORTIS BENEFITS INS MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM Total for Department 6050 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE MONITOR STAND/KEYBOARD T DRUMMOND AMERICAN CO CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN JAYTECH, INC. CHEMICAL REAGENT MAPCON TECHNOLOGIES MAPCON LITE SOFTWARE MINNEGASCO,ACCT'S PA MONTHLY GAS MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM ORKIN PEST CONTROL MARCH R & 0 ELEVATOR CO. I APRIL T. D. r S CLEANING MARCH TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE RIVETS TOWER CLEANING SYSTE CITY HALL TROPHIES PLUS CITY COUNCIL PICTURE PLA XeEL ENERGY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY Total for Department 6080 CITY FACILITIES LIGH MINNEGASCO.ACCT'S PA MONTHLY GAS 544.00 841. 35 1,385.35* 52.50 52.50* 242.16 12.42 418.42 227.43 47.84 63.04 42.12 18.75 44.82 7.50 1,124.50* 18.03 7.31 72.50 199.00 51. 85 4.95 13.80 367.44* 76.51 52.66 30.00 159.17* 63.89 250.55 13.04 12.31 35.03 495.00 4,431.81 7.50 82.05 140.00 1.150.80 4.88 1,150.20 5.33 1,099.53 8 I 941 . 92 * 638.23 Date: 03/29/2001 Time: 14:42:22 Operator: BECKY KLINE CITY OF HASTINGS PM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Page: 2 Department Vendor Name Description Amount CITY FACILITIES LIGH XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY -------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------ Total for Department 6081 PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING PLANNING FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM WEILAND, MATTHEW NATrL CONFERENCE WEILAND. MATTHEW STAMPS Total for Department 6090 POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLl CE POLICE POLICE BOISE CASCADE OFFICE OFFICE SUPPLIES CITY OF ST. PAUL MAX THE OPPORTUNITY COLOR LAB INC. (PHOTO FILM DEV EMERGENCY VEHI CLE SU TRUNK SLIDE OUT FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN GALLS, INC. DOUBLE MAG HOLDER GALLS, INC . HANDCUFFS & HOBBLE GRAFIX SHOPPE VEHICLE LETTERING HASTINGS VEHICLE REG VEHICLE TABS JACK'S UNIFORM EQUI BADGES JACKrS UNIFORM EQUI HAT BADGES JACOBSON, JEREMY SAFETY BOOTS MID-AMERICAN SPECIAL BOOKS MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM MINNESOTA SHREDDING DESTRUCTION OLD RECORDS NEXTEL COMMUNICATION 2/19 - 3/18 PAGENET OF MN MARCH PITNEY BOWES MARCH RGNONTI, JAMES ROOM AT HOLIDAY INN SPECIAL TEE'S POLICE TRAINING SIGN STREICHER'S REPAIR REPLACE SHOTGUN S SUPERIOR WIRELESS OF CELL PHONE PLUS VBC UNIFORMS UNLIMITED JOE KEGLEY UNIFORM U. S. INTERNET APRIL WALMART COMMUNITY BR COFFEE Total for Department 6210 D.A.R.E. PROGRAM HASTINGS BUS CO DARE GRADUATION Total for Department 6218 BUILDING CITY OF HASTINGS BUILDING FORTIS BENEFITS INS BUILDING FORTIS BENEFITS INS BUILDING GRAFIX SHOPPE BUILDING GRAPHIC DESIGN BUILDING LUNDER, CHAD BUILDING MESAROS, WILLIAM BUILDING MINNESOTA MUTUAL BUILDING TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN LETTERING FOR ICE DEPT V BUSINESS CARDS I cao CHAPTER EDUC MEETIN EDUCATION MEETING & MILE MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM OFFICE SUPPLIES 944.81 1,583.04* 32 .24 30.90 15.00 915 . 45 18.43 1,012.02* 1,003.18 525.00 40.64 154.43 424.15 415.68 32.17 36.59 52.23 8.50 92.25 656.25 148.00 223.20 232.50 200.00 721.98 293.91 371. 00 132.70 21.30 86.43 21.29 125.82 59.95 81. 63 6,160.78* 345.48 345.48'" 10.50 73.96 51. 56 122.52 72.42 22.50 100.98 37.50 68.12 Date, 03/29/2001 Department BUILDING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS :TS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS STREETS S1 S STRr..J::TS STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHTING Senior Center Time: 14:42:23 Operator: BECKY KLINE CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description UNIVERSITY OF MINNES BUILDING OFFICIALS INSTI Total for Department 6240 C.P.RAIL SYSTEM 10TH ST RAIL CROSSING 81 FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN HASTINGS VEHICLE REG VEHICLE TITLE & REGISTRA MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM Total for Department 6311 BUMPER TO BUMPER RUBBER MAT BUMPER TO BUMPER WINTER BLADES, RUBBER MA CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP P & C ATT KIT & LABOR FORCE AMERICA EAT KIT FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAM GERLACH SERVICE, INC. ELEMENT, AIR CLEANER GILB TRUCKING LOADER RENTAL H 0 BOSTROM UNIT 142 KREMER SPRING & ALIG SPRING, UBOLT, PINS, LAB LITTLE FALLS MACHINE TRUCK WING BOLT MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, BLADE, PLOW BOLT MACQUEEN EQUI PMENT , PIN MAHONEY, PAUL CLASS B LICENSE MIDWEST MACHINERY, I FITTINGS, REEL, HOSE MINNEGASCO, ACCT' S PA MONTHLY GAS MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM NEXTEL COMMUNICATION 2/29 - 3/18 NORTHERN SAFETY TECH MINI -MAX BEAM BRACKET NORTHLAND ELECTRIC S COIL ROCHESTER SAND & GRA COLD MIX THERMOGAS CO OF HAST CYLINDERS WERNER IMPLEMENT CO 0 RINGS XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY Total for Department 6312 GRAYBAR ELECTRI C G E LAMP XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY Total for Department 6313 FIRST NAT'L BANK SENIOR CENTER APRIL Total for Department 6521 UNALLOCATED EXPENSES MN U.C.' FUND 3RD QTR 2000 UNEMP Total for Department 6920 RETIREE'S HEALTH INS MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM Total for Department 6922 INSURANCES LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 1ST & 2ND QTR Page: 3 Amount 60.00 620.06* 330.83 66.33 57.91 1,609.22 35.00 2,099.29* 29.80 40.44 4,023.13 195.83 121.87 109.51 42.69 5,050.00 48.89 1,033.37 80.63 181.63 30.97 11. 00 67.87 1.135.85 60.00 299.32 134.93 139.54 2,307.30 93.72 2.75 310.82 15,551.86* 270.93 1,808.75 2,079.68* 1.527.35 1,527.35* 6.99 6.99* 55.93 55.93* 84,229.50 Date, 03/29/2001 Time: 14:42:24 Operator: BECKY KLINE Page: 4 Department Vendor Name Description Amount CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report INSURANCES LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 2001 PREMIUM 18,145.00 INSURANCES LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS ANNUAL PAYMENT 26,935.00 INSURANCES LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS DEDUCTIBLE - BUKKlLA, ZG 992.00 Total for Department 6923 130,301.50* PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREA~~ON PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION PARKS/RECREATION AQUATIC CENTER AQUATIC CENTER AQUATIC CENTER AQUATIC CENTER AQUATIC CENTER AQUATIC CENTER AQUATIC CENTER CULTURE/RECREATION CULTURE/RECREATION Total for Fund 101 CITY OF HASTINGS PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN GERLACH SERVICE, INC. POWER BROOM ATTACHMENT GERLACH SERVICE, INC. TRIMMER LINE & SERVICE GERRY'S FIRE PROTECT INSPECTION HYDRO TURF INC ASSEMBLY HYDRO TURF INC TURF SPRAYER IDS CAPITAL FAX COPY MACHINE LEEF BROTHERS, INC. SUPPLIES MINNEGASCO,ACCT'S PA MONTHLY GAS MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM NEXTEL COMMUNICATION 2/19 - 3/18 O'BRIEN, JOE CHEVROL CAP ASM SHERWIN-WILLIAMS ASE OIL BLACK WHEELER HARDWARE HINGES XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY Total for Department 6520 Total for Fund 200 ADOLPH KIEFER & ASSO LIFEGUARD T-SHIRTS, SWEA JOHNSON. DARBIE A.D MILEAGE LIFEGUARD STORE, THE T-SHIRT, WHISTLE.LANYARD METROCALL PAGER SERVICE MINNEGASCO. ACCT 'S PA MONTHLY GAS MN RECREATION /PARK AQUATIC CONFERENCE XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY Total for Department 6511 Total for Fund 201 MOSS & BARNETT CABLE RENEWAL PROCESS WESTFIELD INS. COMPA COMMERCIAL INS PACKAGE Total for Department 6560 Total for Fund 205 FIRE EGGERT MICIlAEL SUPPLIES FIRE FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FIRE FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN FIRE GERRyrs FIRE PROTECT INSPECTION FIRE METRO FIRE. INC. EQUIP 173,374.86* 2.00 114.16 101.58 252.93 78.95 200.12 360.00 9,551.98 172.53 47.71 900.03 60.00 50.81 49.45 10.43 81. 47 1,265.29 13,299.44* 13,299.44* 41. 88 120.75 192.95 11.25 246.35 195.00 -6,097.39 -5,289.21* -5,289.21* 296.50 2,680.00 2,976.50* 2,976.50* 81. 79 157.46 135.68 157.49 614.54 Date, 03/29/2001 Time: 14:42:25 Operator: BECKY KLINE CITY OF HASTINGS PM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report page: 5 Department Vendor Name Description Amount FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE METRO FIRE. INC. SUPPLIES MINNEGASCO,ACCT'S PA MONTHLY GAS MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM SMOKE EATERS MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION TWIN CITY GARAGE 000 TRANSMITTER & RECEIVER VAN WORMER. DIANA INSTRUCTION WALMART COMMUNITY BR SUPPLIES WHITEWATER WIRELESS, DEPOT REPAIR WHITEWATER WIRELESS, TECH LABOR XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY Total for Department 6220 AMBULANCE EMERGENCY APPARATUS SERVICE MOORE MEDICAL CORP. SUPPLIES REGINA MEDICAL CENTE SUPPLIES SMITH, DOREEN REFUND WALMART COMMUNITY BR OFFICE SUPPLIES Total for Department 6230 N'" -"..ANCE A JillCE AMBULANCE AMBULANCE Total for Fund 213 OTHER SERVICES/CHARG BOLTON & MENK INC ENGINEERING OTHER SERVICES/CHARG HOISINGTON KOEGLER G LANDSCAPE DESIGNS OTHER SERVICES/CHARG ST. CROIX ENVIRONMEN ENV REVIEW Total for Department 6700 Total for Fund 400 ADMINISTRATIVE/UNALL ADMINISTRATIVE/UNALL ADMINISTRATIVE/UNALL HOISINGTON KOEGLER G PLANNING & DESIGN SERVIC TKDA ENGINEERS DESIGN & ENGINEERING TKDA ENGINEERS SURVEY FOR FACILITY Total for Department 6072 JAYCEE'S PARK HOISINGTON KOEGLER G PLANNING & DESIGN SERVIC Total for Department 6728 ROADSIDE PARK HOISINGTON KOEGLER G PLANNING & DESIGN SERVIC Total for Department 6772 WALLIN PARK HOISINGTON KOEGLER G PLANNING & DESIGN SERVIC Total for Department 6790 Total for Fund 401 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS DAKOTA COUNTY TREASU STREET ASSESSMENTS Total for Department 6636 Total for Fund 402 OTHER SERVICESjCHARG EMERGENCY VEHICLE SU CHANGE OVER EQUIP 610.95 2,407.78 90.00 240.00 138.45 200.00 144.21 997.17 87.00 917.37 6,979.89* 6,992.15 571. 69 421.28 688.60 172.03 8,845.75* 15,825.64* 3,361.50 4,149.57 3,245.64 10,756.71* 10,756.71* 225.00 16,793.79 2,568.83 19,587.62* 219.68 219.68* 945.00 945.00* 1.073.56 1,073.56* 21,825.86* 818.86 818.86* 818.86* 2,578.96 Date, 03/29/2001 Time: 14:42:25 Operator: BECKY KLINE CITY OF HASTINGS PM Entry - Invoice payment - Department Report Page: 6 Department Vendor Name Description Amount Total for Department 6700 Total for Fund 403 ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM SOLUTIONS 4SURE INC. UPG OFFICE 2000 Total for Department 6631 Total for Fund 404 OTHER SERVICES/CHARG FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM OTHER SERVICES/CHARG FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN OTHER SERVICES/CHARG MN REAL ESTATE JOURN SUBSCRIPTION OTHER SERVICES/CHARG MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM Total for Department 6700 Total for Fund 407 OTHER SERVICES/CHARG BOLTON & MENK INC ENGINEERING OTHER SERVICES/CHARG DWYER & ASSOCIATES DESCRIPTION SKLTCH Total for Department 6700 Total for Fund 491 WATER WATER WATEll. WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER BATTERIES PLUS BATTERIES BUMPER TO BUMPER BURG SUPREME CHAMPION COATINGS IN ESTIMATE WATER TOWER REF COLOR LAB INC. (PHOTO DEVELOP FILM CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL LABOR & MILEAGE CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL LABOR & SERVICE TRIP CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL LABOR & SERVICE TRIPS CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL MINI BAYONET CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP SADDLE BOX DRAWER UNIT ECOLAB PEST ELIM.DIV ODOR UNITS FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN GOPHER STATE ONE-CAL FEBRUARY GRAYBAR ELECTRIC BUTT SPLICE CONNECTOR HASTINGS FORD~JEEP~E SHIELD KITS HASTINGS VEHICLE REG VEHICLE TITLE & REGISTRA MINNEGl\SCO,ACCT'S PA MONTHLY GAS MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM NEXTEL COMMUNICATION 2/19 ~ 3/18 O'BRIEN, JOE CHEVROL PUMP, FUEL FILTER, VALVE RHINO LININGS OF SO. TRUCK LINER RIVERTOWN EYE CLINIC SAFETY GLASSES SHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT, ROLLER SWANSON PLBG. & HEAT REPAIR LEAK ON MAIN 2,578.96* 2,578.96* 10.82 17.43 6.00 222.74 256.99* 256.99' J 0.82 4.06 75.00 1.50 91. 38* 91. 38* 4,013.77 805.00 4,818.77* 4,818.77* 124.09 17.03 5,950.00 25.33 1,830.90 467.30 957.60 10.86 1,066.81 10.65 96.12 81.10 48.00 579.78 60.85 1,396.64 1,883.42 46.25 147.18 358.83 392 . 99 152.15 176.91 77.50 Date, 03/29/2001 Time: 14;42;26 Operator; BECKY KLINE Page; 7 Department Vendor Name Description Amount WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WASTEWATER WASTEWATER WASTEWATER WASTEWATER Wl'....'T'EWATER ~ .lWATER WASTEWATER TRANSIT TRANSIT TRANSIT CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report T.D. 'S CLEANING UTILITY & STREETS OFFICE TKDA ENGINEERS ENGINEERING SERV - MOTOR US FILTER DISTRIBUTI ECR REGISTERS, MULTI PORT US FILTER DISTRIBUTI MULTIREAD PORT EXPANDER XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY Total for Department 7100 Total for Fund 600 FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN LAKELAND TRUCK CENTE INSTALL AIR DRYER & PART MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, SELONOID VALVE MeES WASTEWATER SERVICE APRIL MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM XCEL ENERGY MONTHLY ELECTRICITY Total for Department 7300 Total for Fund 601 FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMHJ1II! MINNESOTA SAFETY COD DEF2NSIVE DRIVING MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM Total for Department 7500 TRANSIT-OPERATIONS DIAMOND MFG, INC VAULT KEYS TRANSIT-OPERATIONS FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM TRANSIT-OPERATIONS FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN TRANSIT-OPERATIONS HASTINGS BUS CO CHARTER TRANSIT-OPERATIONS MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LI FE INS PREMIUM TR. T-MAINTENANCE TRANSIT-MAINTENANCE CIVIC ARENA CIVIC ARENA CIVIC ARENA CIVIC ARENA CIVIC ARENA CIVIC ARENA CIVIC ARENA CIVIC ARENA CIVIC ARENA CIVIC ARENA CIVIC ARENA Total for Department 7501 HASTINGS TIRE & AUTO TIRE CHANGE, BALANCE LAKELAND TRUCK CENTE BRAKE Total for Department 7502 Total for Fund 610 DOMINO'S PIZZA PIZZA FARMER BROS CO. COFFEE FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD M.G. MCGRATH, INC. APPLICATION MIDWEST COCA-COLA BT POP MINNEGASCO,ACCT'S PA MONTHLY GAS MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM NEXTEL COMMUNICATION MARCH R & R SPECIALITIES, BLADE GRINDS THERMOGAS CO OF HAST 6 CYLINDER REFILLS Total for Department 7700 PREMIUM PREMIUM #4 JAN 319.50 176.94 1.678.86 -119.67 2,474.23 20,488.15* 20,488.15* 35.18 33.35 481.54 132.04 63,602.00 16.25 679.36 64,979.72* 64,979.72* 12.50 195.0G 6.30 213.80* 44.60 20.79 34.89 24.57 15.00 139.85* 105.00 142.92 247.92* 601.57* 35.65 32.80 42.39 32.54 2,184.00 99.25 9,118.98 15.00 70.39 70.50 84.67 11,786.17* Date; 03/29/2001 Time: 14;42;26 Operator; BECKY KLINE Page: 8 CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice payment - Department Report Department Vendor Name Description Amount Total for Fund 615 11,786.17" HYDROELECTRIC HYDROELECTRIC HYDROELECTRIC FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM FORTIS BENEFITS INS MONTHLY LTD PREMIUM JAN MINNESOTA MUTUAL MONTHLY LIFE INS PREMIUM Total for Department 7900 14.07 13.50 7.50 35.07* Total for Fund 620 35.07* Grand Total 339,225.44* April 2, 2001 APPROVED: City Administrator Finance Director Councilmember Hazlet Councilmember Riveness Councilmember Schultz Councilmember Moratzka Councilmember Hicks Councilmember Yandrasits Mayor Werner VI-2 March 27,2001 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Council FROM: John Grossman, HPC Staff RE: Appointments to Heritage Preservation Commission The HPC has two vacant positions as former commissioners have retired. The HPC advertised and interviewed applicants and recommends the appointment of the following residents: Jacqueline R. Boler, 402 W Seventh S1., with term to expire Jan. 31, 2003 Marlene M. Craft, 216 E Second S1., with term to expire Jan. 31,2004 The staggered terms are requested in order that three of the nine commissioners' terms will expire every year. TKDA ENGINEERS. ARCHITECTS. PLANNERS TOLT,n 3)UVALL. ANOERSON AND;Y I~ ';S. INCORPORATED 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101-2140 PHONE; 651/292~4400 FAX: 651/292-0083 Comm. No. 11610-01 Cert. No. 4 St. Paul, MN, March 12 ,20~ To City of Hastings. Minnesota Owner This Certifies that Champion Coatings Inc. , Contractor For Repainting of the 4th Street Elevated Water Storage Tank Is entitled to Five Thousand Nine Hundred Fiftv and 001100 Dollars............................................ ..($5.950.00) being 4th estimate for partial payment on contract with you dated June 6 , 2000 Received payment in full of above Certificate. Champion Coatings Inc. ,20 David L. Moore, P.E. RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT CONTRACT , PLUS EXTRAS, PAYMENTS CREDITS Contract price plus extras $ 159,000.00 All previous payments . $ 151,050.00 All previous credits " , , Extra No. ..-,. .. .. " .. , " " " " -.--.. Credit No. " " " " .. " .. .. .. AMOUNT OF TIllS CERTIFlCATE $ 5,950.00 Totals $ 159,000.00 $ 157,000.00 Credit Balance , There will remain unpaid on contract after payment of this Certificate $ 2,000.00 1$ 159,000.00 II $ 159,000.00 II I An Equal Opportunity Employer INVOICE CHAMPION COATINGS INC. PO BOX 905, LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55044-0905 (952)469-2660 FAX (952)469-2470 TKOA 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR ST. ST. PAUL, MN ATTN; DAVE MOORE 1651-292-4400 fax 651-292-0083 INVOICE # DATE JOB # JOB NAME LOCATION 2011-F 1112012000 . 106 CITY OF HASTINGS HASTINGS. MN ~r~~~=~[n:*~~~~nl"~r-;~:~~~ctJ~~r:::_fF;;~~~2~~.:~fJt:;1!J~~!:=J Repainting of the 4th Street Elevated Water Storage Tank ..... $' ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM: . 159.000.00 TOTAL COMPLETED TO DATE: $ 159,000.00 , L. ~. '2.t!>IJD.otJ ':'~. LESS 5%-RETAlNAGE $ SUBTOTAL; $ 1~f)(X). ~ 1 r ,ClClO.ae LESS PREVIOUS PAY REQUEST: $ 151,050.00 FINAL PAYMENT DUE: $ 7,9g8.88 ~ ~ "t,SZl. WHITE COPY - CUSTOMER, YEllOW COPY - JOB FILE PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE VI-4 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Osberg, City Administrator March 29, 2001 Resolution-Authorizing Media One of the Upper Midwest to Temporarily Operate the Cable Communications System RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION It is recommended that the City Council take action approving the attached Resolution Authorizing Media One of the Upper Midwest to Temporarily Operate the Cable Communications System. BACKGROUND Previous City Council action resulted in an extension until March 31, 2001 of the cable television franchise. The City and ATT Broadband continue to exchange comments on the proposed new franchise agreement that will govern the cable television system in the City of Hastings. Through correspondence between Brian Grogan, who is the attorney representing the City of Hastings, and ATT Broadband, it is expected that final comments on the proposed draft agreement will be ready for discussion and negotiation soon. At that time, the City, Mr. Grogan and representatives from ATT Broadband will conduct a meeting to address any outstanding issues. Until such time that the agreement is ready for approval, the attached Resolution will grant the authority to continue operation of the cable television system through the end of June, 2001. CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION No. AUTHORIZING MEDIAONE OF THE UPPER MIDWEST, INC. To TEMPORARILY OPERATE THE CABLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WHEREAS, the City of Hastings, Minnesota ("City") passed and adopted an Ordinance (hereinafter referred to as the "Franchise") granting a non-exclusive franchise; and WHEREAS, the Franchise is currently held by MediaOne of the Upper Midwest, Inc. ("MediaOne"); and WHEREAS, the City adopted Resolution No. 12-1-00 extending the term of the Franchise until March 31, 2001; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 47 U.s.C. ~ 546(a) MediaOne provided notification to the City of Media One's intent to seek renewal of the Franchise under 47 U.S.C. ~ 546(a-g); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 47 U.S.C. ~ 546(a) the City properly commenced franchise renewal proceedings; and WHEREAS, the City and MediaOne have agreed, pursuant to 47 U.S.C. ~ 546(h), to conduct franchise renewal negotiations informally in an attempt to reach a mutually acceptable franchise agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and MediaOne are interested in continuing informal discussions and negotiations regarding franchise renewal; and WHEREAS, both the City and MediaOne desire to expressly reserve all of their respective rights under state and federal law. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Hastings, Minnesota that: 1. The City hereby authorizes MediaOne to operate the cable television system in the City of Hastings, in full compliance with all of the terms and conditions of the Franchise, for a period commencing on April!, 2001 and continuing through either the date on which MediaOne's Franchise is either renewed or until June 30, 2001 whichever shall first occur. 2. This Resolution shall become effective upon the occurrence of both of the following conditions: (1) The Resolution being passed and adopted by the City Council 410191/1 of the City of Hastings; and (2) MediaOne's acceptance ofthis Resolution and the Franchise for the term specified in paragraph (1) above, provided MediaOne accepts and agrees to each and every term of this Resolution and the Franchise within fourteen (14) days from the date this Resolution is passed and adopted. Adopted by the City Council of Hastings, Minnesota this ,2001 day of CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA By Its ATTEST: CERTIFICATION I, , City of the City of Hastings, Minnesota the custodian of its records, do hereby certify the above is a true and exact copy of a Resolution passed, adopted, and approved by the City Council of said City on , 2001. Dated: ,2001 By: Its: 410191/1 2 ACCEPTANCE MediaOne ofthe Upper Midwest, Inc., hereby acknowledges the City of Hastings, Minnesota Resolution No. ("Resolution") and Ordinance No. , attached hereto and referenced in the Resolution ("Franchise") and hereby accepts each and every term, provision and recital of the Resolution and agrees to be bound by the terms and provisions of the Franchise in accordance with the Resolution. By: Dated: ,2001 MEDIAONE OF THE UPPER MIDWEST, INC. Its: SWORN TO BEFORE ME this _ day of ,2001 NOTARY PUBLIC 410191/1 3 VI-5 RESOLUTION NO. 4- -01 RESOLUTION DECLARING THE CITY OF HASTINGS TO JOIN IN THE "MINNESOTA CITIES: BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES EFFORT" WHEREAS, the top values and priorities of citizens include safety, family, job opportunities, health, the well-being of children, and recreational opportunities; and WHEREAS, many of the services cities provide directly enhance those citizen priorities; and WHEREAS, the connection between city services and how they benefit citizen priorities and concerns is not always understood by citizens; and WHEREAS, it is one of the responsibilities of city officials to ensure legislators, media and citizens understand their governments through open and frequent communication using various avenues and means; and WHEREAS, it is important to encourage citizens to actively participate in city government, to share their views, and to work in partnership with city officials to ensure that the needs of the community are met; and WHEREAS, partnerships developed between citizens and city officials can result in greater understanding of the connection between Minnesota's high quality of life and the services provided by Minnesota cities, as well as in greater trust by citizens in the efforts of their city government; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Hastings hereby declares its commitment to join in the "Minnesota Cities: Building Quality Communities" statewide educational effort in cooperation with our fellow members of the League of Minnesota Cities. We hereby designate David M. Osberg, City Administrator or as the City of Hastings key contact for this effort, and will inform the League of Minnesota Cities of this designation. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA TillS 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2001. Ayes: Nays: Absent: Michael D. Werner, Mayor ATTEST: Melanie Mesko, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 4- -01 RESOLUTION DECLARING mE CITY OF HASTINGS TO JOIN IN THE "MINNESOTA CITIES: BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES EFFORT" WHEREAS, the top values and priorities of citizens include safety, family, job opportunities, health, the well-being of children, and recreational opportunities; and and WHEREAS, many of the services cities provide directly enhance those citizen priorities; WHEREAS, the connection between city services and how they benefit citizen priorities and concerns is not always understood by citizens; and WHEREAS, it is one of the responsibilities of city officials to ensure legislators, media and citizens understand their governments through open and frequent communication using various avenues and means; and WHEREAS, it is important to encourage citizens to actively participate in city government, to share their views, and to work in partnership with city officials to ensure that the needs of the community are met; and WHEREAS, partnerships developed between citizens and city officials can result in greater understanding of the connection between Minnesota's high quality of life and the services provided by Minnesota cities, as well as in greater trust by citizens in the efforts of their city government; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Hastings hereby declares its commitment to join in the "Minnesota Cities: Building Quality Communities" statewide educational effort in cooperation with our fellow members of the League of Minnesota Cities. We hereby designate David M. Osberg, City Administrator or as the City of Hastings key contact for this effort, and will inform the League of Minnesota Cities offuis designation. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA TIDS 2ND DAY OF APRIL,2~01. Ayes: Nays: Absent: ATTEST: Michael D. Werner, Mayor Melanie Mesko, City Clerk -..r> The League of Minnesota Cities encourages cities to show their participation in the Building Quality Communities campaign with the promotional items in this catalog. Use these promotional items with your city's BQC campaign to: · Convey the positive message that city services and activities create community. . Remind citizens that their participation in the community is essential to its success. . Share this grassroots message that cities enhance Minnesota's quality of life. For more information on the Building Quality Communities educational campaign and to order your free custom logo, visit www.lmnc.orgj bqc/home.cfm, or contact Laura Petersen at (651) 215-4031 or Ipeterse@lmnc.org. Thank you for your continuing support of the BQC campaign! .... .... The League of Minnesota Cities has established a vendor relati There is no minimum number of items required to make a purchase. Shown her, If your city is interested in other items, contact Larry McPe BALLOONS Show your support of community events with bunches of colorful balloons! 11" balloons, assorted blue and orange with white logo. $9.00 per bag (50 balloons per bag) Item 301 PENCILS Hand these out at your next community-wide event! Orange with blue logo imprint. $ .20 each Item 302 PENS Daily reminders of your BQC commitment. Bic Clic Stic Pen-white barrel, orange trim, blue logo, black ink. $ .65 each Item 303 CERAMIC MUGS Reward your volunteers with a BQC mug! 11 oz. mug, white with blue logo on both sides. $2.40 each Item 304 IDEAS FOR USING THESE PROMOTIONAL ITEMS IN YOUR CITY: · Balloons at community events, such as ribbon- cutting ceremonies, park clean-ups, school award ceremonies, etc. ~;~ ~~~;;:::::;:;;:7, - · Static-cling stickers in your municipal vehicles or city hall windows . Light post banners hung during Cities Week or year-round . Mugs or other items given as thank-yous to volunteers · Prizes during National Night Out or neigh.,. borhood block parties ~ onship with Specialty Outfitters, Ltd. to offer these BQC items. ~ are some of the most-requested products, but anything under the sun is possible! ck at Specialty Outfitters, (763) 717-7282 or (800) 639-1026. I CALL FOR DETAILS ON CUSTOM BANNERS STATIC CLING STICKERS Local citizens will understand your commit- ment to community life when they spot these stickers in your city vehicle windows or the front door and office windows of City Hall. 33/4" x 7V2", orange background, blue and white logo imprint. $1.50 each Item 305 BUTTONS Identify your city staff and volunteers as people who care about community building. 1314" x 23/4", rounded comers, orange background, blue and white logo imprint, pin fastener on back. $ .45 each Item 306 PARADE CANDY Sweeten the parade route as you celebrate your summer festival! Individually wrapped in white wrapper, blue and orange logo, mixed fruit flavors. $40.00 per case (1,000 candies per case) Item 307 BANNERS Street post banners proclaiming 'a thriving downtown will be custom-made to fit your light posts. Add your city name to the BQC logo and highlight your BQC involvement. Banners can be printed on sturdy, long- lasting canvas or vinyl at competitive costs (brackets also available). Call Larry McPeck at Specialty Outfitters for details on pricing. Get a free BQC logo with your city's name and use it to customize any of the merchandise you see here. Go to www.lmnc.org/bqc/home.cfm to request your logo, then contact Larry McPeck at SpeCialty Outfitters for details on additional costs to customize these items. YOUR CITY HERE Building a Quality Community ~ "'INNI.Ola Clflll Building Quality Communities <.. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, Minnesota 55103-2044 ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 Balloons (bag of 50) Pencil Pen Ceramic mug Static cling sticker Button Parade candy (1,000 candies per case) Banner MINNESOTA CITIES Building Quality Communities Specialty Outfitters, Ltd. Attn: Larry McPeck 9157 Davenport Street NE Blaine, MN 55449-4915 Phone: (763) 717-7282 Toll Free: (800) 639-1026 24-Hour Fax: (763) 717-7283 E-Mail: specialout@aol.com '" FIRST ClASS u.s. POSTAGE PAID . St. PIIul, MN PERMIT NO. 3223 BQC PRODUCT CATALOG ORDER FORM Today's date: Merchandise needed by (this Info required): Name: Title/Dept. : City: Street address: City/state/zip: Phone: Fax: Bill to: Ship to (If different than above): $9.00/bag $ .20 ea. $ .65 ea. $2.40 ea. $1.50 ea. $ .45 ea. $40.00/case Call for pricing SUBTOTAL: Tax Exempt # Add 7% sales tax Mpls./St. Paul residents Add 6.5% sales tax all other MN residents Shipping and handling (see ch81t below) j,.... Get a FREE BQC logo with your ~ city's name and customize any of the products in this catalog! To order your free BQC logo, go to www. Imnc.org/bqc/home.cfm. There is an additional cost to customize merchandise- contact Larry McPeck at Specialty Outfitters for pricing details. TOTAL: Shipping llr. handling charges Add up to $29.99..... $6.95 $30.00 to $49.99..... $8.95 $50.00 to $99.99... $10.95 Add $100.00 to $149.99.. $12.95 $150.00 to $249.99 .. $14.95 OVer $250.00... $16.95 ua,gue of Minnesota C;Ues G"U" promonng Q%cQllence 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 Phone: (651) 281-1200 (800) 925-1122 Fax: (651) 281-1299 TDD (651) 281-1290 March 19, 2001 Dear City Administrator: Do you feel that you're always battling state laws that ignore local authority, or a reporter who only covers city events when the news is bad, or residents that only complain and aren't involved? Last year, the League of Minnesota Cities launched a public education campaign called Building Quality Communities to enhance the perception of Minnesota cities and increase citizen trust and participation in their local government. By working together, we believe all cities can begin to define themselves in a positive light, rather than reacting to how legislators, the media, and other groups characterize us. More than 270 cities have joined us in this statewide effort and we extend another invitation to your city to pass a city council resolution (see enclosed). This statewide, grassroots, effort gives cities strength in numbers and one voice in challenging negative perceptions and conveying the message that city governments are essential to quality of life in Minnesota. We believe we can gain greater legislative cooperation and strengthen our partnership in serving our common constituents. We have made this easy to participate. The League's web site has numerous resources to help your city use the key messages, as well as draft letters to the editor on hot legislative topics. The brochure enclosed features various promotional items to use at community events this summer to celebrate your community building. Contact Public Relations Coordinator Laura Petersen at 651.215.4031,800.925.1122, or Ipetersetcllmnc.org, if you have any questions about this program. Your participation will help guarantee your success in Building a Quality Community. Sincerely, r-tfYl~ James F. Miller Executive Director AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMA TIVE ACTION EMPLOYER VI-6 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Osberg, City Administrator March 29, 2001 Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hastings Supporting Legislation Directing the Department of Administration to Adopt a Building Code for Rehabilitation of Historic Structures RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION It is recommended that the City Council take action approving the attached Resolution of The City Council of the City of Hastings Supporting Legislation Directing the Department Of Administration to Apopt a Building Code for Rehabilitation of Historic Structures. BACKGROUND Along with a copy of the Resolution, I have attached a copy of the proposed legislation (Senate File #407). The legislation would require the Minnesota Department of Administration to adopt building code for rehabilitation of historic structures, including certain provisions regulating National Register of Historic Places, and certain other Historic buildings. Once approved by the City Council, Staff would forward a copy to State Senator Steve Murphy and State Representative Jerry Dempsey. RESOLUTION # Resolution of the City Council of the City of Hastings Supporting Legislation Directing the Department of Administration To Adopt a Building Code for Rehabilitation of Historic Structures WHEREAS, Legislation has been introduced that would direct the Minnesota Department of Administration to adopt a building code for rehabilitation of historic structures; and WHEREAS, The proposes legislation would include properties listed on the National Register of Historic Places and properties designated by a certified local government, under the National Preservation Act of 1966 and whose designation is approved by the State Historic Preservation Officer; and WHEREAS, The City of Hastings is a certified local government and his 177 historic properties designated or listed on the National Register of Historic Places; and WHEREAS, Certain regulations and code requirements relating to historic buildings should be established that may be more sensitive to the historic nature of certain buildings and their rehabilitation needs and limitations; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hastings, that It hereby supports Senate File #407 and House File #471, and the City Administrator is directed to send a copy of this Resolution to Senator Steve Murphy and State Representative Jerry Dempsey encouraging their support for the legislation. Ayes: Nays: Adopted by the Hastings City Council this 2nd Day of April, 2001. Michael D. Werner Mayor Melanie Mesko City Clerk -seal- S.F No. 407, as introduced Page 1 ofl lelll.'.tur. Hom.' S..NlII I H.lp I t.lnb to th. World KEY: fltrie]reli = old language to be removed underscored = new language to be added NOTE: If you cannot see any difference in the key above, you need to change the display of stricken and/or underscored language. f,.uthors and Stattl~ · .List versions S.F No. 407, as introduced: 82nd Legislative Session (2001-2002) Posted on Jan 29,2001 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.10 1.11 1.12 1.13 1.14 1.15 1.16 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 A bill for an act relating to the state building code; directing the department of administration to adopt a building code for rehabilitation of historic structures; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 16B. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: Section 1. [16B. 614] [CODE FOR REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES. ] By July 1, 2002, the commissioner must adopt rules establishinq a buildinq code for the renovation and rehabilitation of historic structures, includinq properties listed on the National Reqister of Historic Places and properties desiqnated by either a certified local qovernment or a heritaqe preservation commission created under the National Preservation Act of 1966 and whose desiqnation is approved by the state historic preservation officer. The commissioner may adopt a model code by reference, with necessary modifications for Minnesota conditions. Sec. 2. [EFFECTIVE DATE.] Section 1 is effective the day after final enactment. http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/cgi-binlbldbill.pl?bill=S0407 . O&session= Is82 3/27/01 VI-7 MEMO To: Mayor & City Council ~_ d 4lAA-I' ~ From: Marty McNamara ~~ 'm~ Subject: Parks Excess Property Date: March 29, 2001 The City of Hastings is planning on scheduling an auction of excess equipment for Saturday, May 51h, 2001. The auction is scheduled to be conducted at the Parks Garage located at 920 west 10lh street. Parks Department staffis requesting that the following equipment be declared excess: 1985 Chevrolet 1 ton dump truck 1988 Ford Yz ton pickup 1984 Walsh turf sprayer 1985 Cushman Turf Truckster H.P. Printer-fax-scanner Hockey Boards 2 Light Poles Post hole auger-tractor mount This equipment if approved by Council as excess equipment will be sold at the May 51h auction. City staff will dispose of any equipment not sold. VI-8 To: From: Date: Re: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk March 28, 2001 Application for Gambling Premises Permit-Jack J. Jorgensen Charitable Trust- at Hastings Country Club, located at 2015 Westview Drive Recommended City Council Action: Approve the attached Resolution authorizing the Jorgensen Trust to conduct a raffle on July23,2001. Backl.iJround: Application has been received from the Jack J. Jorgensen Trust to conduct a raffle for their organization on July 23, 2001 at the Hastings Country Club, located at 2015 Westview Drive in Hastings. The raffle's total value of prizes is estimated not to exceed $2,500.00. If Council should approve this application, the attached resolution will be sent to the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Board showing the City's approval to allow the raffle. The Gambling Control Board allows up to 5 licenses of this type to be issued to a nonprofit organization per year. The Jack J. Jorgensen Trust has applied for, and has received approval from the City Council forthe last two years. Should you have any concerns or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Attachment: 1. Resolution- Waiving the 30 day waiting period for the Jack J. Jorgensen Charitable T rustat Hastings Country Club, located at 2015 Westview Drive Application materials on file. RESOLUTION NO. EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA HELD: APRIL 2, 2001 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hastings, Dakota and Washington Counties, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on the 2nd of April, 2001, at 7:00 o'clock P.M. for the purpose in part of authorizing Resolution No. , authorizing the Jack 1. Jorgensen Charitable Trust to conduct a raffle on July 23, 2001 at the Hastings Country Club at 2015 Westview Drive. The following Councilmembers were present: and the following Councilmembers were absent: Councilmember adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved its RESOLUTION NO. 04- -01 RESOLUTION APPROVING RAFFLE LICENSE APPLICATION FOR THE JACK J. JORGENSEN CHARITABLE TRUST WHEREAS, the Jack J. Jorgensen Charitable Trust has presented an application to the City of Hastings to conduct a raffle on July 23, 2001, at the Hastings Country Club, at 2015 Westview Drive in Hastings; and WHEREAS, the application for Exemption from lawful Gambling license has been presented; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hastings that the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to sign this resolution and forward to the Minnesota Department of Gaming, Gambling Control Division, showing Council approval of this application for an Exemption from Lawful Gambling License. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember , and, after full discussion thereof and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Michael D. Werner, Mayor ATTEST: Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk (SEAL) VI-9 TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk March 28, 2001 Approval of Amusement License Transfer Council Action Reauested' . Approval of transfer of amusement licenseto Sky Ventu res, LLC. Background: Sky Ventures purchased Pizza Hut in 2000 and transferred the liquor license at that time. During an audit of City-issued licenses, it was noted that the amusement license was not transferred at the same time. The establishment continues to have one game of skill and one juke box, as did the previous owner. if you have any questions. please do not hesitate to contact me. VIII-B-1 To: From: Subje ct: Mayor Werner and City Council Matthew Weiland, City Planner First Reading/Order Public Hearing (Chapter 4 Construction Regulations -SEC. 4.1S ACCESSORY STRUCTURES) March 29, 2001 lvtElvI<9'RANVUlvI Date: Background The City currently has very few and vague ordinance requirements regulating accessory building and structures. City Council members and City staff have received complaints recently about new accessory structures/buildings that were constructed. In response to these complaints and anticipated future problems, City staff were directed to draft new accessory structure/building regulations. The new regulations being proposed are based on what many other cities require for minimum standards for accessory structures and buildings. The main changes these standards add to the City's existing ordinance are size requirements, impervious surface requirements, and stronger design elements. These ordinance changes are being proposed to eliminate bad developments, rather than punish good development. The majority of existing accessory structures/buildings in the City would meet the minimum requirements of the new proposed ordinances. I have enclosed maps of different sections of the City, depicting how the new ordinances would be enforced and their impacts. These new proposed ordinances will provide the City a clear tool to use in regulating future accessory structure/building development Hastings Plannina Commission Public Hearina: No public comments were received at the planning commission public hearing. Planning Commission Recommendation: The Hastings Planning Commission recommended approval of an ordinances amending Chapter 4 Chapter -SEC. 4.15 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, at their 3/36/01 meeting. Recommendation Motion to recommend approval of the first reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 4 Construction Regulations -SEC. 4.15 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES and to schedule a public hearing for April 16th, 2001 . ORDINANCE NO. , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA AMENDING CHAPTER 4 CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS OF THE HASTINGS CITY CODE HAVING TO DO WITH: SEC. 4.15 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Hastings as follows: SEC. 4.15 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Chapter 4 of the Hastings City code is amended by adding following text: Subd. 4 ACCESSORY BUILDING AND STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS - Accessory Building and Structures shall meet the following requirements: 1. No accessory buildings shall be erected in any required front or side yard fronting a public street or right of way. 2. No accessory building or structure shall be constructed on any lot prior to the time of construction of the principal building to which it is accessory. 3. Accessory structures, except fences meeting the requirements of Sec 4.15 Subd.l , shall not be placed in any easements. 4. All accessory structures, except fences, shall meet the setbacks listed in Table 1. 5. All accessory structures shall be setback at least 6ft from all other structures. 6. At grade accessory structures such as basketball courts, patios, dog kennels shall meet the accessory structures setbacks listed in Table 1. These accessory structures are not included in the total allowable square footage allowed, as long as the total impervious surface of the lot does not exceed 35% for the rear yard. The rear yard shall be measured for the rear building line to the rear lot line. 7. Accessory structures shall have weather resistive exterior finishes that are durable and architecturally compatible with and similar in design, color, and material to the principle structure. 8. The following Table (Table 1) shall determine the number, size and setbacks of 1 accessory structures. In addition to the accessory structures listed in the Table I, one accessory storage structure up to 120 sq. feet in size, and swimming pools meeting the requirements of SEC. 4.15 ACCESSOR Y STRUCTURES Sub2 Swimming pools. Table 1 Accessory Building/Structure Number, Size and Setbacks Setbacks Standards Property Zoning Numb e r T 0 t a 1 Side S ide Rear Structures Structure size Corner* A R-l,R-2,R-3,R-4, R-5, 1 1000 5 10 5 R-6 1 1000 5 10 5 Multi - Family Sit e plan Site plan Commercial/Office Districts reVIew reVIew Industrial Districts Sit e plan Site plan reVIew reVIew * Garages shall be set back 20 ft from Right of Way SECTION 10.26. VIOLATION A MISDEMEANOR. Every person violates a section, subdivision, paragraph or provision of this Chapter when he performs an act thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, or fails to act when such failure is thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as for a misdemeanor except as otherwise stated in specific provisions hereof. 2 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Hastings City Council on this 2001. day of Michael D. Werner, Mayor ATTEST: Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant! City Clerk 3 - I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of an ordinance presented to and adopted by the City of Hastings, County of Dakota, Minnesota, on the of 2001, as disclosed by the records of the City of Hastings on file and of record in the office. Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/ City Clerk ( SEAL) This instrument drafted by: City of Hastings 101 4th ST. Hastings, MN 55033 4 1\,)1\)1\J..a.-Jr.~~~....Jrr......Jrr......Jrr..-Ir.....Jrr.. ~~OID~~~~~W~~OID~~~~~W~~ (,) ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... (,) ...... I\.) ...... 01 ...... ./>. 01 ...... CD ...... ...... ....., ...... (,) I\.) (j) ./>. I\.) ....., (,) CD ~ (j) CO (,) ./>. 0 0 0 ...... ./>. (j) CO 01 ...... 01 ...... 0 ./>. 0 ....., (,) 01 ...... 0 01 ...... I\.) CD (,) 0 0 0 (,) ...... ....., ...... ./>. 01 ...... 0 ...... ....., CO 0 (j) () CD (j) ./>. ...... I\.) I\.) OJ I\.) I\.) ./>. CD () (j) CD ;:0 ro ...... ~ ~ r r d CD ...... .... ./>. I\.) :J ...... III ;:0 .." .... a;l III .... C/l ./>. 0 CD CD =r .... .... c. C/l 0 =r =r CD a III III =r =r III ::!. C/l C. .... C ..., C. C/l .... C/) .... ~ 3 ..., C/) III C/) 0 =r ::J c. ~ < =r C/) C/) C/) CD "'\J 0 iii' c. ~ C/) .... .... :i:: ^ iii' .... C/l C/l CD ..., C/) ..., (ii' C/) ~ .... ..., ~ .... :i:: III CD CD .... 0 r )> () - CD CD CD ~ CD ..., CD c5 CD r ::J III 0 ::E ..., CD C/) ~ ^ () < <1l - CD <1l CD - - III ::J CD C .... .... C/) - r 0 <1l ::J C/) 0 <1l :i:: .... - CD :i:: m OJ c - <1l .... CD :J ~ ..., - :i:: :i:: :i:: m - III III ..., C <' <1l III CD CD <1l ::J 0 ~ CD <1l C/l <1l CD <1l - C/l <1l C/l l: CD <1l C/l VI <1l - .... .... C/l C/l - - - - <1l - .... < III a. (,) ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... CD CD CD CD CD co co co ....., ~ ....., 01 ./>. N 0 co ./>. (,) I\.) ...... ...... ...... ...... CD CD ....., I\.) ...... co ....., ....., CD I\.) ...... (j) <1l 0 co CD ....., ./>. ./>. (,) ...... ...... 01 I\.) (,) ...... ...... 0 CD co (j) 0 I\.) ./>. 01 0 0 (,) CD ./>. (j) W 01 (j) I\.) ...... I\.) I\.) 01 0 I\.) ....., ....., CD ...... 0 w I\.) ...... (j) 01 00 00 CD 01 (j) 01 0 0 0 0 01 ./>. (j) ./>. W 01 01 W (,) ./>. ./>. (j) 01 ./>. ./>. (j) W W ./>. 01 W ....., :i (,) 00 I\.) ....., (j) I\.) I\.) ...... ....., 0 0 ./>. I\.) ./>. CD co (j) ....., 0 ...... CD ./>. ~ ~ '* ~ eft. eft. ~ eft. ~ ~ ~ '* eft. eft. eft. ~ ~ ~ ~ '* '* '* ..., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD III ..., 'Qi ..., <1l III ...... .., CD CD (j) ./>. 01 01 W ./>. W ./>. (j) ./>. ./>. ./>. (j) c." I\.) I\.) w I\.) w (j) ...... I\.) 01 ./>. CD co ./>. 0 CD 0 I\.) ....., 0 I\.) 0 ...... CD CD ....., 0 ./>. 0 ...... CD ~ (j) 01 co co CD (,) 0 ....., ....., 0 ....., 0 ./>. (j) 01 0 ~ I\.) III ...... 00 CD (j) ....., 01 (j) ...... (j) W ./>. ...... I\.) I\.) ./>. (j) I\.) CD 01 0 ..., co N <1l ./>. _I\.) _I\.) ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... in ".t- ".t- co <::. CD ....., ....., ~ CD 01 00 0 I\.) w ...... ....., co 0 01 ...... 0 0 01 00 ./>. I\.) 0 01 0 00 I\.) I\.) ...... co ....., I\.) I\.) ./>. 0 (j) CD 0 (j) 0 ....., ...... 0 (j) ...... 010 01 0 01 (j) ....., CD ...... W ...... CD W ...... co ...... ..f>. I\.) I\.) ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... i--> ".t- r.v r.v CD 00 00 (j) co ....., ....., co w ....., ....., 0 ...... I\.) 00 co ./>. 00 00 ...... 0 0 0 (,) co 01 ./>. 00 Ol .f>. I\.) co 0 00 w 0 co 0 .f>. CD 00 ...... ...... I\.) 0 01 01 0 ...... 0 ....., (j) (j) ....., ...... ...... I\.) ...... ...... I\.) ...... I\.) (j) 01 (,) W I\.) ...... I\.) I\.) ...... ...... ...... ...... I\.) ...... ...... ...... I\.) ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... 0, i--> ~ '".!>. (j) ".t- ~ ...... ...... 0 <::. i--> ....., . ...... I\.) 01 0 0 I\.) (,) ...... 0 ...... 0 CD 01 ....., (j) 00 (j) I\.) (,) ....., 0 co ....., 0 CD 0 0 w w co ...... ~o (j) ...... 01 (j) W 01 0 0 I\.) co ...... (j) 0 ...... 01 ...... ...... ....., (j) ....., )> )> c. 0 c. 0 <1l C/l C/l o -< C/) - ..., l: n l: CD Z l: 3 0- <1l .., C/l ~ - r ~ - c. ;:0 -< c. C/) I\.) 01 ~ w o ~ W 01 ~ :::c CD 0> ...., -< 0> a. ....10. N .-+ :::::f' en .-+ .., CD CD .-+ l88JlS puelLlsV ~ ~ o ~ '<: ~ tn ~ sa Ql trJ ~ (0)(0)1\) 0 0l00l :::c CD ~~~ CD ~ 000 ~r- :E I .:'......0' :::c:::c:::c -<9- N CD CD CD r+ . -<?- z r 0>0>0> ~C/) :T CD ...., ...., ...., a. N" 0 -<-<-< en o , (0 C/)CD s- o CD 0>0>0> -. , r+ ii: ...., ...., ...., NCO i- ::0 "tJ ~ :::J a. a. Co ., 0 III CD I\) (1) m III .... a. I I I ~: 0. ~ c: '..... (1) Ul CD :i' ..... ..... ..... .J:>.0l (jj lC O>-I:l-..... r+ Ul ""'-I (0) CO ""'-I en 0.....(0) j.p ~ en en en en;::: (1) .0 .0 .0 .0 " " . . en ;:::;::l!;::l! ? r+ . . . :iE · -<:r z 6l Q) .., D1 .., c. m ......s: Ow 8>< (J)CJ> ..c -. . N CD ? II ;_...__............._..........o--...--_.......n..u........--......... n._ n._...__.___._ : 1 : : 11 : : ........................................................................ ....................'1.! 22 " :::J'" "00 i i r-+- "--, "CD "CD i i r-+- "~ "CD "c/) i! r-+- . . ....___......__..__.._~h~ Oh._...._........._n__._....__.__n..______n._._.... "::-.>0' .......... WWI\) U10U1 '#'#'# ;;c;;c;;c CD CD CD Q)Q)Q) .., .., .., D1D1-< ..,..,tn c.c.a. I , , ..... ..... ..... ~I\)O 000 .......... ..... f/)f/)f/) .0 .0 .0 . . . ;:I!;:I!;:I! 6' "'ll l1l m ~ 5. ft g c: fij S' ee en fD (C CD :::J a. ;;c CD ~r- -<g. ~CIJ c. j::;j' ClJCD j::;j' , CD <0 ,<0 ~I\) 01\) Of/) w.o f/);:I! .0 . ;:I! n ~ o ~ -;::: = ~ ~ ~ Ql trJ U1 ~ ~ 0> P+ :T (J) P+ ., CD CD P+ ~ CD rn P+ --:::::::::::::::::::=::::;:::::::::::::::::::::---- os: nn o~ o. (/lei> n ,nnnnn n'___...n .c N' __ nO"_ ........::::::.:::.--:............. . ~ '__'__.__,____,____n__n.__n~'----'i\::....::::::::::.n.:::n:.::':..:,:::::.,:nn:..:n,',",',--..'::.. _ ....__...... u ...~ .:~.~~ ~::: ".::::::::::: ::_.::::::.:::::::".::::::.:_:::::::::U on _ _ _ -------.... ...:::_::::::--::::........ __n__::.::::--::::::..... ::E .~z m ..~ - .__n_... ........,.?>' -in- - ..--_.... __ n_n__ ~-- .......n_ l~ -< m a . . "01 r CD (0 CD :J a. ~ '" 0- t/I ~ m ~ 5. ~ c: iil :i' lC t/I " ~----_...- t~~~::..._~::- . . . (..) (..) .., 01 0 ,'-' O~~O1 o '#. ;o;:C;:c COCO CO ~~m -<-<' mm-< "m 0.0.' , I a. ..........' (..).....CO --..10000 OO.....~ (/)(/)(/) .0.0.0 . . . ?'??' un_':::::::::::: ;:c co ~r -<2- ~Cf) a. N' Cf)CO N" COCO ,CO w~ CO(/) (..).0 m. ~? ? C) ~ o ~ '<: = ~ ~ ~ Q) trJ ~ Co\) en <0 ~ CD r+ =r- oo r+ ~ (D (D r+ ~ (D rn r+ .....'" 0001 .....~ cncn .0 _. . N ;::lICD . II ....s: OD) Ox o cnw. .oN . CD ;::I! II ;c (1) I>> .., ~ .., a. laaJlS AaSwett ~ ~ o ~ ~ = ~ ~ 5?J ~ tn ..lr. U>U>I\> ;C Q') ~OO1 (1) 0 ~~~ ~r o 0 N :'~':"~.:. 0' ;C;c;c -<a :::0 ~ II (1)(1)(1) ~cn .~z r- ~Q)I>> a. N" m CD -<...,.., g , <0 1>>-<-< cnCD 3 B- CD ..,Q)I>> -. , . Noo rn l:: ;;u -c :] a. a. a. ~ OJ (1)-...,J <D 0 III E. III ..., a. I '(X) m ~: . 0.. 0 is: , I '< CD ...... U>-...,J Ul 5' ......CO-...,J iii' (Q ...... Ul O~OO ~UJ en ......~-...,J mOP ,... UJUJUJ UJ;::: ~ .o-P-P .0 . <D ;:::?? ? <D ,... VIII-B-2 Memo To: From: Date: Subject: Mayor Werner and City Council Matthew Weiland, City Planner March 29,2001 First Reading/Order Public Hearings - New Hastings Building and Development Ordinances City staff have been working on revising and drafting new builder/developer ordinances for over a year. The purpose of these ordinances are to provide a higher level of service to its citizens. These ordinance revisions are a direct response problems experienced through current building and development practices within the City. BuilderIDeveloper Ordinance Revision Process City staff comprised of the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Parks Department and the Building Department held several meetings to discuss the building and development process within the City. The goal of City staff was to streamline and improve these processes. The following items were brought up as major areas of concerns that needed be addressed: 1. Grading procedures 2. Tree preservation and plantings 3. Financial Guarantees 4. Utility over sizing policy 5. Erosion control 6. Final grade as-builts 7. Certificate of occupancies City Staff next held four builder/developer workshops in which all local builder/developers were invited to attend. The planning committee of the City Council also attended the last two meetings The purpose of the meetings were to explain staff concerns and perspective and to gain insight on how to address these concerns from the builder/developer pont of view. The ordinance revisions being proposed were developed from many ofthe comments at these workshops as well as from City Staff comments. All the new ordinances proposed are already in place and being enforced in many other Cities. I Background Information: City staff are proposing new ordinances to provide better development and building within the City of Hastings. These policies are designed to enhance the- City and protect existing and future residents. The new policies are broken into development polices and building policies. New Development Policies Street Tree Policy - There is a need for more trees in the City of Hastings. The City has decided to go back to it's historical roots and require boulevard trees along all streets. This creates softer and greener streets. It also adds to the appearance of new developments and enhances the environment. All new roads in the City will require boulevard trees. Developers will be required to submit a tree plan as a part of the subdivision process. This tree plan will identify the location and species* of trees in the subdivision. There shall be a street tree placed every 50 linear ft per city standards and one front yard tree planted per lot. These trees shall be planted prior to a lot receiving a certificate of occupancy. The only major changes to the current ordinance are requiring a tree plan and requiring boulevard trees are planted according to an approved landscape plan. * Permitted Species of trees shall be determined by the City Forester. Front Yard Tree Policv- A front yard tree shall be planted on each developed lot according to the approved tree plan, before a certificate of occupancy is granted. An escrow shall be required for the street tree if occupancy is requested before the tree is planted. Note: The City currently requires two front yard trees (2" diameter) per lot in a new subdivision. Escrows are currently required for unplanted trees. Gradinl! Policy- The City needs to get better grading plans and needs tighter enforcement of grading to ensure quality and consistent developments to existing and future homeowners. This process also needs to be streamlined, so there is no confusion from rough grading to home building and final grading. More detailed requirements have been added to the required grading plan elements in order to create higher quality and user friendly grading plans. The following items have also been added for more consistent grading and erosion control. - Developers shall place a 3 foot strip of sod behind the curb of all newly graded areas - All certificate of surveys shall be based on the approved grading as-built. 2 - Developers shall provide builders a copy of the approved grading as built. Gradin{! Inspections- City Staff is currently is requiring grading inspections by policy that they would now recommend placing in ordinance form. Utility Over sizin~ - The City currently requires many new developments to put in larger and deeper utility mains than are required to serve the proposed development. The purpose ofthis over sizing is to be able to serve future development outside the proposed development in the most efficient method. This over sizing adds costs to the proposed development that do not directly benefit that development. City staff is proposing to pay for the over sizing of utilities through the use of City SAClInterceptor Sewer funds and City WAC funds. These funds are set up to pay for these types of utility improvements. Street Desi{!n - City staff is proposing ordinance changes to allow narrower street widths where appropriate. City staff are also proposing new cul-de-sac regulations that would prohibit cul-de-sacs except where there are specifics engineering reasons to require them based on existing property condition, topography, or natural features. City staff is also proposing to require landscape islands in all cul-de-sacs. New Building Policies Erosion Control Plans - The City is proposing that all new development have silt fences installed. This would apply to all individual development lots from residential to commercial. The silt fence would be required in the front yard, along existing developed yards, and where needed for erosion control (determined by engineering department). A rock driveway would also be required to be installed per city approved standards. An erosion plan control plan would have to be submitted with the building permit. Survey Inspections - The City is proposing new survey requirements to ensure that homes are built and graded correctly. The City would require the following two survey inspections: A. Top of Block Inspection - The City will require a top of block inspection to verify garage slab elevation, top of block elevation, and lowest front and rear opemng. B. Final Grade Inspection - A final grade inspection will be required prior to issuance of CO, to check for correct final grade. These inspections would be performed by the City engineering department and paid for as part of the building permit fee. Any additional surveys required, would be paid for at time of certificate of occupancy. LandscaDin{! Policy- The City is proposing to require front yards and side yards to the rear of the home be sodded. A front yard tree is also required. 3 Certificate of Occupancv Escrow Policy - The City will require an escrow for all uncompleted items prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Uncompleted items may include sod, trees, driveway, sidewalk, etc. This escrow may be cash or the builder may provide evidence that there has been an escrow established for these items with a lending institution. Street Sweepinl,:- The City has had many recent problems with dirty streets. This is bad for the streets, the storm sewers, and homeowners in the area. The City is proposing to start performing street inspections in active development projects twice a week and would immediately order street sweeping if required. The fee for the street sweeping would be charged to the builders of individual properties. The City would be able to withhold issuance of certificate of occupancies until street sweeping fees are paid. Construction Trash and Debris Ordinance- In order to maintain cleaner building sites, City staff are proposing new ordinances that would require all builders to store construction waste and debris in on-site dumpsters or enclosed fenced in areas. Builders will be responsible to keep the building sites clear of trash, waste, and debris except in designated areas. Conclusion The purpose of these new policy changes is to improve building and development practices within the City of Hastings. All of these policies enhance the final development product for future and existing residents. They will add value and assets to future developments in the City. Many of these policies are already being followed by developers within the city. The City is not intending to delay or add unnecessary hardship to builders/developers. These policies are viewed as realistic and necessary to good development within the City. After new policies have been adopted, City staff will be producing a Development Handbook and a Builder Handbook. These handbooks will provide checklists and all required information to streamline the development process within the City. It will also allow for more consistent and more efficient review of development applications. Hastine:s Plannine: Commission Public Hearin~: No public comments were received at the planning commission public hearing. Plannine: Commission Recommendation: The Hastings Planning Commission recommended approval of two new ordinances amending Chapter 4 Construction Regulations and Chapter 11 Subdivision Regulations, at their 3/36/01 meeting. City Council Plannin~ Committee Recommendation - The City Council Planning Committee attended the final two builder/developer workshops and recommended approval of the proposed ordinance changes amending Chapter 4 Construction Regulations and Chapter 11 Subdivision Regulations. 4 Recommendation (2 separate motions): Motion to recommend approval of the first reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 4 Construction Regulations and to schedule a public hearing for April 16'h, 2001 Motion to recommend approval of the first reading an ordinance amending Chapter 11 Subdivision Regulations and to schedule a public hearing for April 16'h, 2001 5 ORDINANCE NO. , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA AMENDING CHAPTER 4 CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS OF THE HASTINGS CITY CODE HAVING TO DO WITH: Amending SEC 4.03 SEC 4.03 CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY Amending SEC 4.04 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Adding SEC. 4.16 Erosion Controls Adding SEe. 4.17 Survey inspections Adding SEC. 4.18 Street Sweeping Adding SEe. 4.19 Trash and Debris BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Hastings as follows: CHAPTER 4 CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS IS AMENDED WITH THE FOLLOWING TEXT CHANGES AND ADDTIONS: CHAPTER 4 CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS SEC. 4.01 STATE BUILDING CODE ADOPTED. Subd. 1. Building Code. The 1998 Minnesota State Building Code, established pursuant to Minn. Stat. 16B.59 to 16B.73, one copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, is hereby adopted as the building code for the City of Hastings. Such code is hereby incorporated in this Ordinance as completely as if set out in full. Subd. 2. Administration Required. The following chapters of the 1998 Minnesota State Building Code are adopted without change by the City of Hastings. 1. 1300 - Minnesota State Building Code 2. 1301 - Building Official Certification 3. 1302 - Construction Approvals 4. 1305- Adoption of the 1997 Uniform Building Code including Appendix Chapters: a. 3, Division I, Detention and Correctional Facilities b. 12, Division II, Sound Transmission Control 15, Reroofing 16, Division I, Snowload Design e. 29, Minimum Plumbing Fixtures 31, Division II, Membrane Structures 5. 1307 - Elevators and Related Devices 6. 1315 - Adoption of the National Electrical Code (1996) 7. 1325 - Solar Energy Systems 8. 1335 - Floodproofing Regulations 9. 1341 - Facilities for the Handicapped 10. 1346 - Adoption of the Uniform Mechanical Code (1991) 11. 1350 - Manufactured Homes 12. 1360 - Prefabricated Buildings 1361 - Industrialized/Modular Buildings 1370 - Storm Shelters (Manufactured Home Parks) 15. 4715 - Minnesota Plumbing Code (1998) 7670 - Minnesota Energy Code (1994) (The 1999-2000 Chapter 7676,7678 new energy code was adopted on July 20,.1998, Chapters 7672, 7674 effective April 15, 2000 Subd. 3. Administration Optional. The following chapters of the code are adopted without change by the City of Hastings: 1. Appendix Chapter 33 Excavation and Grading 2. Chapter 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems with option 8a (Group M,S,or F occupancies with 5,000 or more gross square feet) Subd. 4. Organization and Enforcement. There is hereby established in this jurisdiction a code enforcement agency which shall be under the administrative and operational control of the Supervisor of Inspections and Code Enforcement. The Building Official is hereby authorized and directed to enforce all the provisions of this code. For such purpose, the Building Official shall have powers of law enforcement officer. The Building Department shall be the Inspections & Code Enforcement Department of the City of Hastings. The Appointing Authority shall designate the Building Official for the City of Hastings. Subd. 5. A. Permits, Inspections and Fees. Permits, inspections and fees shall be as provided in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code and as adopted by the City Council of the City of Hastings. B. Surcharge. In addition to the permit fee required by item ?A? above, the applicant shall pay the required surcharge to be remitted to the Minnesota Department of Administration as prescribed by Minnesota Statutes 1984, 168.70. Source: Ordinance 370, 2nd Series . Effective date: 4-6-95 Source: Resolution 02-03-00 Effective date: 2-7-00 SEC. 4.02 SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR MOVING BUILDINGS Subd. 1. Conditions and Procedures. No building or structure shall be hereafter 2 moved into and/or within the City limits except under the following conditions: A. Any person desiring to move buildings or structures into and/or within the limits of the City shall first apply for a permit with the City Planner, and shall at he time of the making such application pay to the City a fee of fifty dollars ($50.00). B. The building or structure(s) must be so constructed as to be in compliance with all of the building and operating codes and ordinances of the City of Hastings at the time of the issuance of the permit, and must be in good repair and condition. . Subd. 2. Submittal and Review Requirements. At the time for the filing of the application for a permit to move any building and/or structure(s), as herein contemplated, the applicant shall file an affidavit with the City Planner. Said affidavit, among other things, shall recite the age, type of construction, height, weight, accurate outside measurements, the number of rooms and descriptions thereof (e.g., living room, dining room, kitchen, bedroom, etc.), number of baths, etc., of the structure(s) proposed to be moved, and the address of the location where the building or structure(s) may be personally inspected by the City Building Official or his designated representative. The applicant shall also provide a description of the places from and to which it is proposed to be moved, and the route to be followed. After such inspection, if in the opinion of the Building Official, the building or structure(s) does not meet the conditions as outlined in subsection B above, shall so notify the City Planner who shall refuse to issue the permit; provided however, that if the building or structure(s), in the opinion of the Building Official, can be remodeled, altered and/or reconditioned so as to comply with the requirements of the State Building Code, the Building Official, may issue a permit conditioned on the requirements as set forth by the Building Offici::ll?sofficial's report. The City Planner may at his discretion refer the application to the Board of Design Control as authorized under Section 2.05 of the City Code. Subd. 3. Penal Bond. When a moving permit is issued, it shall be a further requirement that the applicant shall at the time of the issuance of said conditions and, further, shall post a penal bond in the sum of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) in favor of the City, guaranteeing compliance with said conditions. All permits shall be for the duration of one year from date of issuance; however, all exterior improvements to structures and required site landscaping shall be completed within six (6) months of the date of issuance.. Any moving, remodeling, alteration or reconditioning of any building or structure(s) must be completed within the above referenced time periods; and in the case of a conditional permit, said penal bond shall remain in full force and effect until all conditions are fully complied with. Subd. 4. A building permit, such as is required under Section 4.01 of this Chapter for any other construction in the City, and the payment of fees therefor shall be required in addition to the permit to move the building and/or structure(s) into or within the limits of City. Subd. 5. City Costs. Applicants shall pay in advance and prior to issuance of a permit, all labor and material costs to the City of Hastings, including but not limited to 3 police, utility changes and repairs. Subd. 6. Section Application. This Section applies whether the building or other structure(s) proposed to be moved started from a point of origin within or without the City and is to a point of destination within or without the City, or whether the movement is merely through the City with a point of origin and destination without the City. Provided that a public street, or other public property, are used for such movement. No building may be moved using City streets during the period between April 1 st and May 15th of each year. Subd. 7. Abandonment of Water and Sanitary Sewer Lines. Any City water or sanitary sewer services caused to be disconnected due to moving of a building shall be properly abandoned. Proper abandonment shall include capping the corporation stop at the watermain and capping sanitary sewer lines. Source: Ordinance No. 421 Effective Date: 12-15-97 SEC 4.03 CERTIFIC/\TE OF SURVEYBuildinq Permit Submittal Requirements Subd. 1 Survey Requirements- An oriqinal certificate of survey from a licensed surveyor is required for all new development. includinQ expansions of existinq buildinqs. The BuildinQ Official may for accessory structures or minor additions (decks. porches, attached qaraqes), waive the Certificate of Survey submittal requirements in favor of an approved site plan indicatinq the location of existinQ and proposed structures in relation to lot lines. a. The certificate of survey shall reference and be based on an approved Qradinq plan. b. The Certificate of Survey shall include at a minimum the followinQ information: 1. property boundaries 2. existinQ structures 3. proposed structures (includinq driveways) 4. existinQ and proposed lot corner elevations 5. proposed drainaqe flow (arrows) 6. proposed qaraqe floor elevation 7. proposed lowest floor elevation 8. proposed lowest foundation openinq 9. proposed top of foundation elevation (front and rear) 10. proposed finish grade elevations at buildinq corners 11. street riqht-of-way (to center line) 4 12. existinq property monuments 13. Detailed spot elevations for drainaqe swales based on the approved qradinQ plan. 14.existinQ and proposed mid point elevations on side lot lines 15.existinQ top of curb elevations at the extension of side lot lines and at the mid point of the lot 16. On-site sewaqe treatment system location and potable well location. if applicable c. Survey benchmarks shall be identified on certificate of survey. d. Field hubs shall be placed on site by a licensed surveyor to show top of foundation elevation and setbacks. Subd. 2 Buildinq Plan Requirements a. One and Two Family Dwellinqs shall submit the followinQ information 1. One - completed and siQned buildinQ permit application provided by the City of Hastinqs. 2. Three - Copies of Certificate of Surveys with complete information as identified in Subpart 1.2. 3. Two - Copies of the BuildinQ Construction plans with all specifications information includinq: . Enerqy code compliance worksheets. . Window Manufacturer (Fenestration ratinqs) . BuildinQ area take off worksheet form. . Roof truss desiqn certification specs . Floor truss desiqn certification specs . Foundation enqineerinq desiqn or specification information for compliance with MSBC 1305.2109 . Foundation drainaqe system desiqn per 1305.2109 . On site sewaqe treatment system location are (if applicable) 4. One - Plumbinq permit application submitted by licensed plumbinq contractor throuqh the State of Minnesota. 5. One - Heatinq Ventilatinq & Air Conditioninq permit submitted by licensed city contractor. 6. One - Electrical permit submitted to the State Board of Electricity. b. -Multi Unit Residential DwellinQs. Commercial. Industrial. Office and Instutional shall submit the followinq information 5 1. One - Completed and siqned Buildinq Permit application provided by the City of HastinQs 2. Three - Copies of Architectural plans siqned by Minnesota Licensed Architect with Buildinq Code Analysis information. 3. Three - Copies of Minnesota certified Structural plans 4. Three - Copies of Minnesota certified Civil plans includinq site, qradino and utility plans. 5. Three - Copies of the Certificate of Survey prepared by a Minnesota Reqistered Land Surveyor 6. Three - Landscapinq plans. 7. One - Exterior EnerQY envelope worksheet demonstratinq compliance with the Eneroy Code. 8. One - Certified Soil testino report from a third party testinq company. 9. One - Special inspection aqreement from the Certified Architect. 10. One - COpy of the Metropolitan Council SAC. unit determination letter. 11. Two - Sanitary Sewer/watermain/storm sewer plans 12. Two - Plumbinq certified plans 13. Two - Mechanical certified plans 14. Three - Fire suppression certified plans 15. Two - Electrical certified plans Subd. 3 Erosion Control Plan Requirements (May be identified on Certificate of Survey). a. Silt Fence - A silt fence shall be identified on the erosion control plan. The silt fence shall be located alonq the front yard (3 feet from curb or behind sidewalk), alono existinq developed yards, and where needed for erosion control as determined by the City's EnoineerinQ Department.- b. Rock Driveways - A rock driveway shall be identified on the erosion control plan. The rock driveway shall be constructed of CA1/CA2 Course Aqqreqate 1-2" rock - 6" deep per MPCA Manual. Subd.4 Natural Resources Manaaement Plan Requirements (all plans can be on same survey) a. Tree Plans - Shall identify boulevard/street tree and front yard tree location and type of tree (based on approved tree plan). b. Tree Protection - Shall identify protected trees and tree protection systems. ~ In addition to pkms ::md spocifications required to onsure compliance with the state building code and prior to issu::mco of;) building pormit, 6 e:lch applic~1nt t:hall be required to submit :l Certific:lte of Survey including at a minimum the following inform3tion: property bound:lrios, oxisting structures, proposed structures (including driveways), lot corner elevations, proposod dr3in::lge flow (arrows), proposed g::lr3ge floor elev3tion, proposed lowet:t floor elev3tion, proposed 1000'Iect found:ltion oponing, proposed top of foundation elevation, stroot right of way (to center lino) 3nd existing property monuments. Field hubs shall be pl:::Jced on site by n surveyor to show top of found::ltion elov::ltion ::lnd cotb3cks. Tho Building Offici31 m3Y for ::lccossory structuros or minor ::ldditions (docks, porches), waive tho Certificate of Survey submittal requirements in favor of submitt:31 of :3 plot plan indic3ting the loc3tion of existing and proposed structures in rol:::Jtion to lot lines. 7 SEC 4.04 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY Subd. 1. In addition to Certificate of Occupancy requirements referenced in the State Buildino Code. Certificates of Occupancy are also required for Group R. Division 3 occupancies. Subd 2. A Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until all buildinq permit or site plan items have been completed or escrowed for. Subd 3. Site Plan Items - The followinq site plan items must be completed prior to receivinq a certificate of occupancy. a. Required Sinole FamilvlTwo Familv Residential Site Plan Items 1. Final yard Grade Approved 2. Front Yard Tree planted 3. Boulevard tree (if any shown on approved tree plan) planted 4. Drivewav completed with permanent required surface 5. Sidewalks completed 6. Sod or hvdro-seedinq established to rear buildinq line of home 7. Street. sidewalk, and curbs pass inspection 8. Street Sweepinq fees paid ( if applicable) 9. Erosion re-inspection fees paid ( if applicable) b. Required Multi-Familv, Commercial, Industrial, Office, and Public Site Plan Items 1. Final Grades and drainaqe approved 2. Landscapinq completed 3. Drivewav and parkinq lots completed 4. Sidewalks and Trails completed 5. Curbs completed 6. Liqhtinq completed as approved 7. Utilities (water. sanitary, storm water)approved 8. Trash enclosures completed 9. Street Sweepinq fees paid ( if applicable) 10. Erosion re-inspection fees paid ( if applicable) Subd 4. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy - Temporary Certificates of Occupancy may be issued for properties with uncompleted site plan items from November 1st - May 1st. The Buildinq Official may allow Temporary Certificates of Occupancy beyond these dates, based on current weather conditions and a financial quarantee for the items to be completed is submitted to the City. Temporary Certificates of Occupancy shall have an expiration date. The City may pull the financial quarantee to complete the required site plan items or the City may find the property owner in violation of this ordinance and brino charqes throuoh the court system. 8 Subd 5. Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Financial Guarantee - A cash escrow or letter of credit submitted to the City is required to receive a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy. Builders/Developers may also provide evidence that they have an escrow established with another aqency addressinq the required site plan items and quarantees that thev will be completed. The escrow amount for Sinole Family/Two Family Residential uncompleted site plan items shall be a standard amount determined by City Council Resolution. Multi-Family, Commercial, Industrial, Office. and Public proiects shall provide escrows in the amount of 125% of the cost to finish the uncompleted items. The BuilderlDeveloper shall provide the City a cost estimate to finish the uncompleted items. Subd 6. Certificate of Occupancy Violation - It shall be a violation of this ordinance to issue a certificate of occupancy to a propertv prior to a all site plan conditions and buildinq code requirements beinq approved or satisfied throuqh financial quarantees accordinq to Sec 404 Subd. 5. SEC 4.05 ABATEMENT OF DANGEROUS BUILDINGS Subd. 1. The UBC Uniform Code for the Abatement of Danqerous Buildinqs (1991 ed.) is hereby adopted as part of this chapter subject to following modifications: 1. All references to "Director of Public Works" in Chapter 8 (Performance of Work of Repair or Demolition), Sec. 801., Sec. 802., and in Chapter 9 (Recovery of cost of Repair or Demolition, Sec. 901.; shall be replaced by "City Planner". Subd. 2. Any action taken by the City of Hastings to abate a dangerous building under provisions of this chapter shall be consistent with the authority granted to the City under Chapter 463 of the State of Minnesota Statutes. SEe 4.06 WRECKING AND DEMOLITION OF BUILDINGS Subd. 1. Permit Required. That any person who proposes to be involved in the demolition or wrecking of structures in the City of Hastings shall before undertaking said wrecking or demolition, obtain a license therefore in accordance herewith. A. Licensee shall obtain a demolition/wrecking permit for each job before undertaking a demolition or wrecking and shall pay the cost of said permit. Demolition permit fees shall be as may set by resolution by the Hastings City Council from time to time. Subd. 2. Application. Application for a "Demolition Company License" shall be made on application forms provided by the City, addressed to the City Building Official. Subd. 3. Regulations. Licensees shall be required to provide advance notice to all concerned utility companies and obtain necessary shut-offs or permissions. 9 A. No demolition refuse or material shall fall more than 15 feet unless in an enclosed chute. B. A licensee shall not install barriers or barricades effecting sidewalks, roadways or private ways, nor shall sidewalk, roadway or private way traffic be diverted without prior written approval of the City Director of Public Works, or such other person as the Hastings City council may designate. Any obstruction or diversion of traffic shall be preceded by notice from applicant to the Hastings Police Department. All demolition work including removal of all debris shall be completed within 30 days of the date of permit issuance. Subd. 4. Fees. Submitted with the application shall be the annual fee in the amount as established by resolution of the Hastings City Council. Subd. 5. License. Said licenses shall be good for the calendar year in which the same is issued and shall expire on the last day of the calendar year of issuance. A. It shall be cause for suspension of the license if the licensee does not comply with all state and city demolition requirements including state statutes, city ordinances, and applicable regulations. B. No demolition or wrecking shall be accomplished by other than a licensed person working under his, her or its direction. Subd. 6. Bond Required. Before issuance of the license, the applicant shall deposit with the Building Official's office a liability policy or bond in an amount of at least $10,000 insuring and indemnifying the City from any and all claims that may be made against it as a result of the applicant's demolition or wrecking activity. Subd. 7. Insurance. The applicant, before issuance of the license, shall file with the City a certificate of insurance covering workers compensation and a public liability insurance policy in the amount of at least $250,000, insuring the applicant for any damage that may be done during the course of the wrecking or demolition or matters incident thereto. Subd. 8. Safety. All demolition companies shall meet and maintain all safety requirements of the State Building Code and comply with provisions thereof. In addition, all foundations of structures which are demolished shall be removed to at least 24 inches below grade. Subd 9. Repair. The person accomplishing wrecking or demolition shall after accomplishing same, repair all common walls, chimneys, doors, stairs and all other portions of remaining adjacent structures exposed as a result of the wrecking or demolition. Included in this requirement is the requirement in the person accomplishing same to repair any adjacent surface and to cover same so that the newly exposed portion of the remaining adjacent structure has a color or finish uniform with and compatible with other existing structures of the immediate area. 10 Subd. 10. Abandonment of Water and Sanitary Sewer Lines. Any City water or sanitary sewer services caused to be disconnected due to demolition of a building shall be properly abandoned. Proper abandonment shall include capping the corporation stop at the watermain and capping sanitary sewer lines. SEC. 4.07 LICENSING CONTRACTORS Subd. 1. License. That it is deemed in the interest of the public and the residents of the City of Hastings that any person, firm or corporation who engages in the business of building, construction or related work, within the City of Hastings shall first secure a City contractors license therefore as provided herein unless such party provides evidence that it is licensed by the State of Minnesota to conduct such activity within Minnesota. A. businesses Hastings: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Licenses shall be obtained by every person engaged in the following or work in accordance with the applicable ordinances of the City of General contractors including those involved in erection, alteration or repair of structures. Masonry, cement work, cement block work, block laying or brick work. Heating, Air condition and ventilation. Roofing. Plastering, stucco work and sheet rock taping. Excavation, including excavation for footings, basements and grading of lots and excavation of streets and other public properties. Lawn sprinkler installers. Residential & Commercial fire alarm installation, maintenance and repair, Gas fitters. Plumbers, Electricians, Fire suppression system installation and repair B. Nothing herein shall be construed as preventing any such qualified licensee from allowing an employee from performing work under his supervision and control, nor a property owner from performing his own work providing all provisions of the State Building Code are met. C. A license granted to a general contractor shall include the right to perform all of the work included in his general contract. such license shall include any or all persons performing the work, provided that each person performing such work is in the regular employ of such general contractor and qualified as required under state law and the provisions of this Ordinance to perform such work. The general contractor shall be responsible for the quality and completeness of all of the work so performed. Subd. 2. Application and Insurance Requirements. Application for said license shall be made to the City Building Official and such license shall be granted upon filing with the City Building Official of certificates evidencing the holding of Public Liability 11 Insurance in the limits of $100.000.00 per person, $300.000.00 per accident for bodily injury and $50.000.00 for property damages and certificates of Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by law. Such insurance policies shall contain provisions that same may not be canceled without 10 days prior written notice thereof being mailed to the City of Hastings. Subd. 3. Liability. This Ordinance shall. not be construed to effect the responsibility of liability for any party owning, operating or installing the above described work for damages to persons or property caused by any neglect therein nor shall the City of Hastings be held as assuming any such liability by reason of the licensing of persons. firms. or corporations engaged in such work. Subd. 4. License Fee. The license fee shall be paid annually at an amount established by resolution of the City Council. Each license shall expire on the 1 st day of January after the same is issued and shall not be prorated. Subd. 5. Waiver of License. The City Council may issue a variance hereto. waiving the requirements of this Ordinance or any portions in the event of a declared emergency and for such period of time as deemed by the Council to be necessary. Subd. 6. Revocation. Any license issued hereunder may be revoked for just cause after a public hearing with four days prior written notice to the licensee. SEC. 4.08 REMOTE READING TYPE WATER METER REQUIRED. Subd. 1. In all new construction using one inch size water meter. or smaller. remote reading type water meters shall be installed at the expense of the owners. In all replacement of present one inch meters, or smaller, the replacement shall be with a remote reading type meter allowing reading of same from the exterior of the building. The meter and the remote reading device shall be installed by a private contractor. SEC. 4.09 SEWAGE AND WASTE CONTROL RULES AND REGULATIONS ADOPTED. Subd. 1. The Sewage and Waste Control Rules and Regulations for the Metropolitan Disposal System is hereby adopted by reference as though set forth verbatim herein. Three copies of said Rules and Regulations shall be marked CITY OF HASTINGS - OFFICIAL COPY and deposited on file in the office of the City Clerk and open to inspection and use by the public. SEC. 4.10 REQUIRED HOOK-UP TO CITY SANITARY SEWER Subd. 1. All properties currently served with on-site sewer systems shall be required to hook-up at owners expense to City sanitary sewer within one (1) year of such time as service becomes available to a property boundary. Furthermore. properties currently being served by on-site sewer systems which have available access to City sanitary sewer as of the effective date of this ordinance (January 14, 1994) shall 12 be required to hook-up within one (1) year. SEC. 4.11 REQUIRED HOOK-UP TO CITY WATER Subd. 1. All properties currently served with private wells for potable water needs shall be required to hook-up at owners expense to the City water system within one (1) year of such time as service becomes available to a property boundary. Furthermore, properties currently being served by private wells which have available access to City water service as of the effective date of this ordinance (January 14, 1994) shall be required to hook-up within one (1) year. SEC. 4.12 ON-SITE SEWER REQUIREMENTS Subd. 1. Adoption of Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards (Chapter 7080). Standards for the installation and repair of individual on-site sewer systems are established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Commonly referred to as "Individual Sewage Treatment Systems Standards - Chapter 7080", these standards are hereby adopted by reference as though set forth verbatim herein. Three copies of said Rules and Regulations shall be marked CITY OF HASTINGS - OFFICIAL COPY and kept on file in the office of the City Clerk and open to inspection and use by the public. Subd. 2. Permit Required. No person shall install, repair, alter or pump an on- site sewer system without first obtaining a permit as provided herein. Applications, provided by the City, must be completed in writing prior to issuance of a permit. Permit fees shall be as provided in Section 4.01, Subd. 5., of this Chapter. Subd. 3. License Required. Installation, and repair of on-site sewer systems requires licensing by the respective County jurisdiction. Persons applying for a permit for installation or repair of an on-site sewer system must provide evidence of licensure with Dakota County if the property where work will be performed is in Dakota County or licensure with Washington County if the property where work will be performed is in Washington County. Subd. 4. Required Conditions A. Soil percolation tests must be completed by an independent party and must be favorable for the operation of an on-site sewer system before a permit will be issued. B. Installations, alterations, repairs and maintenance shall be performed in accordance with MPCA Rules Chapter 7080. C. No private on-site sewer system shall be permitted without approval by the City Council. City Council may deny approval of an on-site sewer on property situated within the Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) due to the pending availability of City sanitary sewer service. SEC. 4.13. ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, TV CABLE AND OTHER SIMILAR UTILITY 13 CONSTRUCTION TO BE UNDERGROUND. Subd. 1. Underground Construction Required. All utility lines hereafter installed, constructed or otherwise placed within the City for electric, telephone, TV Cable, or other similar services to serve residential, commercial and industrial customers in newly platted areas, and which utilize metallic conductors to carry electric current, whether owned, installed or constructed by the supplier, consumer, or any person shall be installed and placed underground in an approved, safe manner, subject only to the exceptions hereinafter stated. Subd. 2. Utility Companies. All companies installing and operating lines such as those described herein shall be referred to as "utility companies" for the purpose of this Section. Subd. 3. Exceptions to Application. The following exceptions to the strict applicability of this Section shall be allowed upon the conditions stated: A. Aboveground placement, construction, modification or replacement of meters, gauges, transformers, street lighting and service connection pedestals shall be allowed. B. Aboveground placement, construction, modification or replacement of these lines commonly referred to as "high voltage" transmission lines upon which the conductor's normal operating voltage equals or exceeds 23,000 volts-phase-to-phase shall be allowed, provided, however, that sixty days prior to commencement of construction of such a project, the Director of Public Works shall be furnished notice of the proposed and, upon request, the Utility Company shall furnish any relevant information regarding such project to the City Engineer. C. Aboveground placement, construction, modification or replacement of lines shall be allowed in residential, commercial and industrial areas where the Council, following consideration and recommendation by the Planning Commission finds that: 1. Underground placement is impractical or not technically feasible due to topographical, subsoil or other existing conditions which adversely affect underground utility placement. 2.Aboveground placement of temporary service line shall only be allowed: (a) During the new construction of any project for a period not to exceed twenty-four months. (b) During an emergency to safeguard lives or property within the City. (c) For a period of not more than seven months when soil conditions make excavation impractical. Subd. 3. Repair and Maintenance of Existing Installations. Nothing in this Section shall be construed to prevent repair, maintenance, replacement or modification of existing overhead utility lines. Subd. 4. Developer Responsibility. All owners, platters or developers are responsible for complying with the requirements of this Section, and prior to the final approval of any plat or development plan, shall submit to the Planning Commission 14 written instruments from the appropriate utility companies showing that all necessary arrangements with said companies for installation of such utilities have been made. Subd. 5. Placement. A. All utility lines shall be placed within appropriate easements or dedicated public ways so as to cause minimum conflict with other underground services. Whenever feasible, all utilities shall be placed within the same trench. B. All utility companies shall submit annually to the Director of Public Works current maps revealing locations of underground installation, whether such installations were installed prior to the adoption of this Section or hereafter. Source: Ordinance 351, Second Series - (Repeal & adoption of entire Chapter 4) Effective date: 1-14-94 SEC. 4.14 COMMERCIAL BUILDING REHABILITATION PROGRAM Subd. 1. General Provisions. A. Authority. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.184 (1995), the City of Hastings has been authorized to establish a program to provide rehabilitation loans to owners of small and medium sized commercial buildings. In establishing a commercial building rehabilitation program, the City Council is acting in all respects for the benefit of the citizens of the City of Hastings to serve a public purpose in improving and otherwise promoting their health, welfare and prosperity. B. Findings. The City Council of the City of Hastings finds that many commercial buildings in the City are physically deteriorating, underused, economically inefficient, or functionally obsolete and in need of rehabilitation to meet applicable building codes; that there is a need for a comprehensive program for the rehabilitation of the commercial buildings to prevent economic and physical blight and deterioration, to increase the tax base of the City, and to assist in the implementation of the comprehensive plan for the City; that some owners of small and medium sized commercial buildings are unable to afford rehabilitation loans on terms available in the private mortgage market or to obtain rehabilitation loans on any terms because the private mortgage market is severely restricted; and that the health, safety and general welfare and the preservation of the quality of life of the residents of the City of Hastings is dependent upon the preservation and rehabilitation of the commercial buildings. C. Definitions. The following terms when used in this Chapter shall have the following respective meanings: 1. Act shall mean Minnesota Statute, Section 469.184 (1995), as nowjn effect and as from time to time amended. 2 .Program shall mean the commercial rehabilitation loan program authorized by the act and set forth in Subd. 2 of this Ordinance. 3. Agency shall mean the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Hastings. 15 4. Small or medium sized commercial building shall mean a structure having a total floor area not exceeding 40,000 square feet, the primary ground floor function of which is commercial in nature, Le., retail service, or office. Noncommercial usage on other floors of such a structure shall not affect the structure qualifying as a small or medium sized commercial building. 5. Regulations means regulations drafted or approved by the agency for the program. D. Administration. The agency is hereby authorized to administer the program in accordance with the act and the regulations and resolutions adopted by the City for the issuance of bonds, loans, or other obligations for the f*Ggfproqram Subd. 2. Program Requirements A. Regulations and Forms. The agency shall adopt regulations setting forth uniform procedures by which applications for loans shall be submitted and processed, and for determining eligibility of borrowers, and other procedures necessary or desirable in carrying out the program. The agency may, in the agoncy?saqency's discretion and from time to time, prescribe and amend forms to be used by an applicant in applying for financing under the program. B. Authorization of Loans. Under the program, no loan shall be made or purchased until the agency or its designee has reviewed the application relating to the loan and has approved such loan. In approving applications for loans under the program, the agency or its designee, in addition to other requirements and regulations, shall consider the following factors: 1. The availability and affordability of private mortgage credit; 2. The availability and affordability of other government programs; 3. Whether the building is required, pursuant to any court order, statute or ordinance, to be repaired, improved or rehabilitated; 4. Whether the proposed improvements will result in conformance with the building and zoning codes and any design guidelines approved by the agency for commercial areas. C. General Limitations. The following limitations shall apply to all loans under the program: 1. No loan shall be made for a period exceeding twenty (20) years. 2. No loan shall exceed eighty percent (80%) of the estimated market value of the property to be rehabilitated upon completion of the rehabilitation, less the principal balance of any prior mortgage or contract for deed existing on the property at the time the loan is made, or Two Hundred Thousand Dollars ($200,000.00), whichever is less. 3. All monies loaned under this program shall be used only on property located within the Hastings HRA Redevelopment Area. D. Interest Reduction Program. The agency may develop and administer an interest reduction program, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.012, Subdivision 7-9, as now in effect and from time to time amended, to assist in the rehabilitation or preservation of small or medium sized commercial buildings. E. Expiration Date. The agoncy?saqency's ability to authorize payment of 16 interest reduction assistance pursuant to this Ordinance shall expire on December 31, 2006. Interest reduction assistance payments authorized prior to December 31, 2006 may be paid after December 31, 2006. Source: Ordinance 386, Second Series Effective Date: 7-18-96 SEC. 4.15 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Subd. 1. FENCES BUILDING PERMITS are required for all fences installed in Hastings. TYPE OF FENCING MATERIALS - There are no requirements as to the type of fencing materials or how they should be installed; however no hazardous type of fencing shall be installed. ie: barbed wire, electric fences, etc. THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT of any residential fence installed within the City of Hastings is 6 feet. Fences installed around swimming pools from ground up must be a minimum of 4 feet high and non-climbable with a self closing-self latching gate. Maximum height of all fences shall be in compliance with the city zoning code or as approved by the planning commission. SETBACKS - All fences may be installed up to but not on the property line. ESTABLISHING PROPERTY LINES - The City of Hastings does not provide surveying service. It is up to the homeowner to establish the location of the lines and make these available upon request of the inspector. SPECIAL CONSIDERATION/CORNER LOTS - Fences that extend into front yards of corner lots MUST NOT impair traffic visibility. No fence or hedge shall be over 30" in height located within 25 ft. each direction from a property corner fronting a street right of way. See drawing below COVENANTS - The City of Hastings does not enforce the private covenants of subdivisions. Homeowners should always check the covenants in their area for additional fence requirements. FENCE REQUIREMENTS - SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS - CORNER LOTS Subd.2 SWIMMING POOLS 01. Definition: As used in this chapter, the term "Swimming Pool" shall include any enclosure 17 above or below grade having a water depth greater than 18 inches, and having a water surface area in excess of 100 square feet, which shall be used or designed for swimming or wading purposes by anyone. 02. BuildinQ Permit Reauired (a) A building permit shall be obtained prior to excavation, erection, or any phase of pool construction. (b) The application for permit shall include:_ (1) Type and size of pool (2) Site plan shall provide: Location of pool, location of house, garage, fencing, and other improvements on the lot. Also the location of filter unit, pump, and wiring indicating the type of such units; location of back-flush and drainage outlet; elevations and final treatments or finishes around the pool. Also the location of overhead or underground wiring, utility easements, trees or other features or heating unit shall be specified. 03. Enclosure Fence All pools to be constructed or already constructed shall be completely surrounded by a fence or wall of not less than four (4) feet nor more than six (6) feet in height. The fence shall be of a type not readily climbed by children. A dwelling house or accessory building may constitute part of the enclosure. An above ground pool with a side wall height of four (4) feet or greater does not require a fence. II gates or openings shall be self-closing and have a self-latching device for security. Pool gates shall have locking devices for off-season or non use. 04. Life-Savina and Emeraency Eauipment (a) One ring buoy not more than 15 inches in diameter with a 3/16 inch rope attached; said rope shall be equal to the greater dimension of the pool. (b) One life pole, or shepherd's crook type pole, at least 10 feet long with blunt ends. 05. Above Ground Pools Shall be protected in such a way that access or entry to the pool can be secured when not in use. 06. City Water Supply There will be no cross-connections of the City water supply with any other source of water supply for the pool. The line from the City water supply to the pool shall be protected against backflow of polluted water by means of either an aid gap, vacuum breaker or other adequate device to prevent back siphonage. 07. Outdoor Pool Enclosures: Outdoor pool enclosures, permanent or inflated shall not exceed 18 vertical feet above the pool deck and shall conform to the Uniform Fire Code. 08. Setback Reauirements: Pools or their outer most appurtenances shall not be located within 10 feet of any side or rear lot line nor within six (6) feet of any principal structure or frost footing. Pools shall not be located within any front yard. 09. Liahtina. Ventilation. and Electrical: When underwater lighting is used, such lights will be spaced to provide 18 illumination so that all portions of the pool and pool bottom may be readily seen without glare. All electrical wiring shall conform to the National Electrical Code of the National Fire Protection Association and shall be approved by the State Electrical Inspector, with particular reference to Article 680-20 (National Electrical Codes ). 10. Overhead WirinQ Clearance: Any overhead wiring shall not be installed above the swimming pool or surrounding area extending 10 feet horizontally from the pool edge, or diving structure, observation stands, towers or platforms 11. Pool Filters: Every pool shall be equipped with a recirculating system capable of filtering the entire contents of the pool in twelve (12) hours or less. (1) Filters shall be capable of maintaining the clarity of the water through an eight (8) foot depth. (2) Filter capacity shall be such that it need not be cleaned more frequently than once every four days under proper conditions of water and operation. (3) All filters shall be equipped with at least one pressure vacuum or compound gauge which shall be positioned in such a way as to determine the differential across the filter and the need for cleaning. (4) All pressure filter systems shall be equipped with an air release at the high point in the system. (5) Operating instructions shall be posted on every filter system. All valves shall be properly designated indicating their purpose. (6) When dissimilar metals are used in the construction of the filter, which set up galvanic currents, then suitable provision shall be made to resist electrolytic corrosion. (7) Filters shall be so designed and installed that they can be readily disassembled and the filter elements removed. 12. Disinfection and ConditioninQ: Suitable methods shall be available to maintain a PH of the pool water between 7.2 and 8.2 and to maintain an alkalinity of not less than 50 ppm. The devices used to apply chlorine or its equivalent as a disinfectant shall be of such capacity as to maintain in all areas of the swimming pool at all times at least 0.5 ppm. of free available residual chlorine or a level of another approved disinfectant which shall be of at least a proven equivalent disinfecting strength as 0.5 ppm. of free available residual chlorine. 13. Modifications: A. The City Council may make modifications in individual cases, upon showing of good cause, with respect to height, nature, or location of the fence or wall, gates, latches, or the necessity therefore, provided the degree protection is not reduced thereby. B. Upon the application of a property owner, the Council may grant extension of time for compliance in individual cases, upon the showing of good cause; such extensions of time shall not exceed thirty (30) days at a time. 19 14. Revocation of a Permit: The Building Inspector may revoke any permit for failure to comply with the regulations of the ordinance. Before a permit is revoked, the pool owner shall have notice in writing listing the failure or failures to comply with the ordinance. The permit shall be reissued upon proper application and upon proof that the deficiencies causing revocation have been corrected. 15. "Public Pools" All pools used for any purpose other than private dwellings shall first have plans and specifications approved by the Minnesota State Board of Health, and subsequently by the Building Official. Subd.3 DRIVEWAY. CURB. CURB CUT CONSTRUCTION General Information: * Site plan with location of buildings, property lines, easements and new driveway drawer to scale must be submitted with permit application. * Driveway shall not be more than (24' residential) and (32' commercial) in width where it meets the property line. Minimum width is 12' except where the existing curb cut is less, then the driveway width must meet the curb cut. * Drivewav slope shall be in accordance with approved qradino plans not to exceed a 4:1 slope. Exceptions to this requirements. based on site condtions. shall be reviewed and approved bv the City Enqineerinq department. * Driveways may extend to the side property line (zero setback). * Where a driveway intersects a curb, gutter, apron or city sidewalk, 3,900 psi concrete mix must be used. * Minimum sidewalk thickness where a driveway intersects is 6". * Install 1/2" expansion joints in accordance with specifications established bv the Public Works Division3s noted on Dr:Jwing #181. * All driveways must be hardsurfaced in accordance with specifications established bv the Public Works Division.AII driveways must be hardsurface as approved by the City Enginoor (asph3It, concreto). * Bituminous curbs and gutters are to be used when existing curbs and gutters are bituminous. 20 * Stroets without curbs and gutters are to be ucod when exicting curbs and gutterc ore bituminous. * Contractor must call for inspection after all forms are set up and expansion joints are in place, and before any concrete is installed. Subd.4 ACCESSORY BUILDING AND STUCTURE REQUIREMENTS - Accessory Buildinq and Structures shall meet the followinq requirements: 1. No accessory buildinqs shall be erected in any required front or side yard fronting a public street or right of way. 2. No accessory buildinq or structure shall be constructed on any lot prior to the time of construction of the principal buildinq to which it is accessory. 3. Accessory structures. except fences meetinq the requirements of Sec 4.15 Subd.1 . shall not be placed in any easements. 4. All accessory structures. except fences. shall meet the setbacks listed in Table 1. 5. All accessory structures shall be setback at least 6ft from all other structures. 6. At qrade accessory structures such as basketball courts. patios. doq kennels shall meet the accessory structures setbacks listed in Table 1. These accessory structures are not included in the total allowable square footaqe allowed, as lonq as the total impervious surface of the lot does not exceed 35% for the rear yard. The rear yard shall be measured for the rear buildinq line to the rear lot line. 7. Accessory structures shall have weather resistive exterior finishes that are durable and architecturally compatible with and similar in desiqn, color, and material to the principle structure. 8. The followinq Table (Table 1) shall determine the number. size and setbacks of accessory structures. In addition to the accessory structures listed in the Table 1 , one accessory storaqe structure up to 120 sq. feet in size, and swimminq pools meetinq the requirements of SEC. 4.15 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Sub2 Swimminq pools. Table 1 Accessory Buildinq/Structure Number. Size and Setbacks Setbacks Standards Property Zoninq Number Total Structure size Side Side Jill[ Structures Corner* A R-1 ,R-2,R-3,R-4, 1 1000 12 1Q " R-5 21 R-6 1 1000 Q 10 Commercial/Office Site plan Site plan review Districts review Industrial Districts Site plan Site plan review review · Garaoes shall be set back 20 ft from Riqht of Ways SEC. 4.16 Erosion Controls Subd 1. Silt Fence Requirements - Silt fences shall be installed prior to construction on the property. Silt fences shall be installed throuqhout the year until the qround freezes as determined by the Buildinq Official. Silt fences may not be required to be installed while the oround is frozen. Silt fences shall be installed immediately after the qround has thawed as ordered by the Buildino Official. Subd 2. Silt Fence Locations - A silt fence shall be identified on the erosion Control plan. The silt fence shall be located alonq the front yard (3 feet from curb or behind sidewalk), alonq existino developed yards. and where needed for erosion control as determined by the City's Enoineerino Department. Subd 3. Silt Fence Address - The address of the buildinq site shall be painted on the silt fence. Subd 4. Silt Fence Ins ections - Silt fence ins ections will be conducted as buildinq inspection for that property. Subd 6. Rock Drivewa Desi n -The rock drivewa shall be constructed of CA 1 CA2 Course Aooreoate 1-2" rock - 6" deep per MPCA Manual. Subd 7. Lot Gradin - The lot shall be raded to the bottom of to immediately after the lot is backfilled and before framinq beqins. 22 SuM 9. Erosion Control Re-Inspection - The Buildinq Department will charqe a re- inspection fee to any lot that has been ordered to correct erosion controls and has not done so by the time of the next scheduled inspection. This fee will be based on a rate established by the City Council. This fee must be paid prior to any further buildinq inspections are scheduled. SEC. 4.17 Survey inspections - The City shall require a top of block inspection and a final qrade inspection. These inspections shall be paid for as part of the buildinq permit fee.: Subd 1. Top of Block Inspection - A top of block inspection shall be performed to verify qaraqe slab elevation. top of block elevation. and lowest front and rear openinq elevations. This inspection shall be performed prior to the buildinq beinq back filled. Subd 2. Final Grade Inspection - A final qrade inspection will be required prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The final qrade inspection shall verify the lot corner elevations. breakpoints. critical areas. swales. ponds. etc. The final qrade inspection shall be performed prior to the lot beinQ sodded. Subd 3. Enforcement - The buildino department will not perform any further buildinq inspections until the top of block inspection has been performed and passed. A certificate of Occupancy will not be qranted to any buildino until the final qrade inspection has been performed and passed by the enqineerinq department or an escrow has been submitted to the City based on City Standards. SEC. 4.18 Street Sweepinq - The City will inspect streets in active development areas to ensure they are free of dirt and debris. Subd 1. Street Sweepino Schedule - The City's Street Department will inspect streets twice a week on a set schedule for active developments. Subd 2. Street Sweepinq Inspection - The City will immediately order street sweepinq for any streets not passino the Street's Departments Inspection. The Street Inspector will make a determination on which lot or combination of lots the dirt and debris came from. The builders of those lots will be billed Subd 3. Street Sweepinq Fee - The street sweepinq fee shall be determined throuoh City Council Resolution. Subd 4. Enforcement - A certificate of Occupancy will not be qranted to any buildinq until all street sweepino fees have been paid in full as determined by the BuildinQ Department. The SEC. 4.19 Trash and Debris - Builders shall be required to store all construction waste. trash and debris in on-site dumpsters or enclosed waste storaoe areas. Construction waste. trash and debris shall be stored in a way that prevents it from leavinq its enclosure. Builders shall be responsible to keep their entire buildinq sites clean of trash and debris. Subd 1. Enforcement - The BuildinQ Department may not perform any further buildinQ 23 inspections on a propertv that has not maintained its trash and debris in a permitted manner. (Sections 4.204-9 through 4.98 inclusive, received for future expansion) Sec. 4.99. VIOLATION A MISDEMEANOR. Every person violates a section, subdivision, paragraph or provision of this Chapter when he performs an act thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as for a misdemeanor except as otherwise stated in specific provisions hereof. Source: City Code Effective Date: Source: Ordinance 351, Second Series 24 VIII-B-3 ORDINANCE NO. , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA AMENDING CHAPTER 11 SUBDIVISION REGULATION (PLATTING) OF THE HASTINGS CITY CODE HAVING TO DO WITH: Sec 11.01 - 11.06 BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Hastings as follows: Secctions 11.01 11.06 of Chapter 11 are repealed and replaced with the following text. SECTION 11.01 PURPOSE AND SCOPE. SUBD. 1. PURPOSE. The provisions of this Chapter are adopted to regulate the subdividing of land within the City so that new additions will be integrated with the Comprehensive Plan ofthe City and will contribute to an attractive, stable and wholesome community environment. SUBD. 2. SCOPE. The regulations governing plats and the subdivision or development of land shall apply within the corporate limits of the City. SECTION 11.02. DEFINITIONS. SUBD. 1. The following terms, as used in this Chapter, shall have the meaning: "Alley". A public right of way less than 24 feet in width which normally affords a secondary means of vehicular access to abutting property. "Arterial street". A street which serves intra-community travel and augments high density arterial systems. The design character provides for access control with emphasis on traffic mobility with a projected average daily traffic (ADT) range of l:reater than 5.000 trips. "Block". An area ofland within a subdivision that is entirely bounded by streets, or by streets 1 and the entire boundary or boundaries ofthe subdivision, or a combination of the above with a river or lake. "Boulevard". The portion of the street right of way between the curb line and property line. "Collector street". A street which serves as a feeder facility from neighborhood and local streets to the collector/arterial network. Also serves as an access for business and residential development. The design character provides for some access control and is for low to moderate operating speeds with a projected average daily traffic (ADT) range 1000 to 15.000. "Cul-de-sac". A short street having but one end open to traffic and the other end being permanently terminated by a vehicular turn around. "Comprehensive plan". A policy document which serves as a guide for the future physical development ofthe City and entitled "Comprehensive Plan, Hastings, Minnesota". "Easement". A grant by a property owner for the use of a strip ofland and for the purpose of constructing and maintaining drives, utilities, including, but not limited to, wetlands, ponding areas, sanitary sewers, water mains, electric lines, telephone lines, storm sewer or storm drainage ways and gas lines. "Final plat". A formal layout of a proposed subdivision encompassing all requirements imposed by the City Council and prepared by a qualified person. "Half street". A street having only one half of its intended roadway width developed to accommodate traffic. "Local street". A street designed to provide access to abutting property and collector streets. "Lot". A piece, parcel or plot of land intended for building development or as a unit for transfer of ownership. 2 "Owner". The record owner, whether one or more persons, or entities of legal or equitable title to the property, but excluding those having such interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation or those having a lien upon the property by provision or operation oflaw. "Outlot". A lot remnant or parcel of land left over after platting, which is intended as open space or other use, for which no development is intended and for which no building permit shall be issued. "Qualified Person". A person recognized by Dakota County as having the required training and experience to prepare plats. "Percentage of Grade on Street Center Line". A the distance vertically from the horizontal in feet and tenths of a foot for each one hundred (100') feet of horizontal distance. "Plat". A map, drawing or chart on which the subdivider's plan of subdivision is presented to the Council for approval. "Preliminary plat". A formal layout of the proposed subdivision prepared by a registered qualified person. "Protective Covenants". Contracts made between private parties as to the manner in which land may be used, with the view to protecting and preserving the physical and economic integrity of any given area. "Subdivision", (and shall include "resubdivision"). A division of a parcel ofland into two or more lots or parcels for the purpose of transfer of ownership or building development, or, if a new street is involved, and division of a parcel of land; provided that: A. A division of land for agricultural purposes into lots or parcels of five acres or more and not involving a new street shall not be deemed a subdivision. B. Such parcel is co-extensive with a separate parcel of record at the effective date of this Chapter. C. An agreement to convey such a parcel has been entered into prior to such time and the instrument showing the agreement to convey is recorded in the office of the 3 Dakota County Register of Deeds within one year thereafter. D. Such parcel is co-extensive with a lot unit or units described with reference to a plat or auditor's subdivision duly filed and of record in the office of the Dakota County Register of Deeds prior to the effective date of this Chapter. E. A minor subdivision (waiver of platting requirements) or boundary lot line adjustment approved pursuant to Section 11.10 ofthis Ordinance shall not be deemed a subdivision. SEC. 11.03. PLAT PRESENTATION PROCEDURES. The following procedures shall be followed in the administration of this Chapter and no real property within the jurisdiction ofthis Chapter shall be subdivided and offered for sale or a plat recorded until a pre-application meeting has been held and a Preliminary Plat and a Final Plat of the proposed Subdivision have been reviewed by the Planning Commission and its technical assistants and until the Final Plat has been approved by the Council as set forth in the procedures provided herein and filed with the Register of Deeds for the County in which the land is located. Plans for Cluster or Planned Developments including housing, commercial, industrial and other uses or for any combination of uses designed for sale or rental purposes shall be presented in the same manner as other plats for the review of the Planning Commission and the approval ofthe Council. SUBD. 1. PRE-APPLICATION MEETING AND SKETCH PLAN. Prior to the submission of any plat for consideration to the Planning Commission, the subdivider shall meet with Community Dc. dopmcnt City Planning Department staff to introduce him or herself as a potential subdivider and learn what shall be expected of herlhim in such capacity and to determine the relationship of the proposed subdivision with the Comprehensive Plan for the affected area. The subdivider shall present a sketch plan pursuant to the requirements of Section 11.04, Subdivision 1 to Conullcluity Dc"dopmcnt Citv Planning Department staff prior to filing a preliminary plat. SUBD. 2. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL. A. The subdivider shall engage a qualified person to prepare a Preliminary Plat of the area to be subdivided as required by Section 11.04, Subdivision 2. B. The subdivider shall submit the following: 4 1. 10 full size copies of the Preliminary Plat 2. 1 reduced size 11 x 17 copy of the preliminary plat to the Community Dc, v dopmcnt City Planning Department at least 21 days prior to the Planning Commission meeting at which plat is to be considered. The required filing fee as established by City Council resolution shall be paid at the time of submitting the preliminary plat. C. The subdivider shall submit to the Community Dc'vdopmmt Citv Planning Department a list of property owners located within 350 feet ofthe subject property obtained from and certified by an abstract company or as prepared by Dakota County. D. Community Dc, v dopmcnt City Planning Department staff shall submit one copy of the Preliminary Plat to the Public Works Division no later than three days after its receipt. E. The Public Works Division shall review the Preliminary Plat and shall transmit a report of its review together with any supporting material to the Planning Commission prior to the meeting at which such Plat is considered. F. The Planning Commission may require qualified technical services such as land planning and legal to review the Preliminary Plat and advise on its suitability regarding general planning; conformity with plans of other private and public organizations and agencies; adequacy of proposed water supply, sewage disposal, drainage and flood control, and other features. The subdivider shall be required to pay the cost of such services. G. The Planning Commission shall review the Preliminary Plat, considering the reports of the Public Works Division and other technicians, if applicable, and shall submit a recommendation to the City Council within 60 days of submittal to the COtlUlltl1llty Dc'vdopmcnt Citv Planning Department. Prior to the approval of a plat by the Planning Commission and referral to the Council, a public hearing shall be held thereon after notice of the time and place thereof has been published once in the official newspaper at least ten (10) days before the day of the hearing. If disapproval of the plat is recommended by the Planning Commission, the Commission shall set forth the grounds for such refusal in its proceedings and shall transmit them to the Council. H. The Preliminary Plat must be acted on by the Council within 120 days after submittal to the Community D"vdopmcnt CitvPlanning Department. I. All final plats shall be submitted for approval within one (1) year of preliminary plat 5 approval. Any preliminary plat not finalized within one (1) year of approval must be resubmitted for recertification by the Planning Commission and Council. SUBD. 3. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL A. The subdivider shall engage a qualified person to prepare a Pinal Plat pursuant to the requirements of Section 11.04, Subdivision 3 which may constitute only that portion of the Preliminary Plat which the subdivider proposes to record and develop at the time. R The subdivider shall submit 10 full size copies and one 11x 17 size copy ofthe Final Plat to the Commclliit} Dc;.dopmcnt City Planning De.partment at least 21 days before the Planning Commission meeting at which such Plat is to be considered. A Final Plat of all or a portion of the Preliminary Plat shall be submitted within one year of Preliminary Plat approval; otherwise, such approval shall become null and void. The required filing fee as established by City Council resolution shall be paid at this time. C. The COmmunity Dc;. dOpllIc'ut City Planning Department shall transmit one copy of the Pinal Plat to the Planning Commission and one copy to the Public Works Division no later than three days after its receipt. D. The Public Works Division shall review the Final Plat and transmit a report to the Planning Commission prior to the meeting at which such Plat is to be considered. E. The Planning Commission shall study the Pinal Plat, considering the reports of the Public Works Division and other City Departments and/or employees, and then transmit its recommendation to the Council within 30 days of submittal to the COhlllltmit} Dc;. dopmGnt Citv Planning De.partment. P. The Council shall act upon the Pinal Plat within 60 days of submittal to the COlll11l1miry Dc'.dopmcnt City Planning Department, whereupon the COtll11ullltty Dc;.dopmait Citv Planning Department shall notify the subdivider of the Council's action. The Council may approve, reject, refer back to the Planning Commission, or require modification in the proposed Final Plat. G. The subdivider shall file the approved Pinal Plat with the ConlDltl1llty De.dopmcnt City Planning Department, and shall record the Pinal Plat with the Dakota County Recorder within 90 days of Pinal Plat approval; otherwise such approval shall be considered null and void. H. At the time of filing the Plat with the City, a cash payment or certified check shall be furnished the City Clerk for the total amount due for interceptor sewer charges, 6 public land dedication fees and any other charges or fees as provided by the City Code. I. The subdivider shall furnish a duplicate hardshell copy and one paper print of the Final Plat as recorded to the Commuulty DGvdopmGnt City Planning Department at the same time the original is submitted for recording. J. The Final Plat must meet all State and County Platting Requirements. K. The Final Plat must show the size of each lot on the plat, in square footage. This may be exhibited either in schedule form or by having the square footage indicated on the drawing of each lot. SEe. 11.04. PLAT PRESENTATION REQUIREMENTS. Information required to be shown in the sketch plan, Preliminary and Final Plats shall be as follows: Subd. 1. Sketch Plan Data. A. Sketch plans shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: 1. Plat boundary. 2. North arrow and graphic scale. 3. Street layout on and adjacent to plat. 4. Designation of existing and proposed land use and zoning. 5. Significant topographical features. 6. General lot locations and layout. 7. Concept plan showing items 1-6 above for adjacent lands owned or controlled by the subdivider. Subd. 2. Required Preliminary Plat Submittal Data. A. Existing Identification and Description. 1. Proposed name of subdivision, which name shall not duplicate or be similar in pronunciation to the name of any plat recorded in Dakota County. 2. Title opinion indicating ownership of property as prepared by a certified title company. 7 3. Location by section, town, range or by other legal description. 4. Names and addresses of the owner(s), lien holders, subdivider, surveyor and designer of the plan. 5. Graphic Scale (no smaller than one inch equals 100 feet and no larger than one inch equals 20 feet), north-point, and date of preparation. B. Existing conditions in tract and surrounding area to a distance of 300 feet for undeveloped areas and to the nearest street right of wav (ROW) or 200 ft for developed areas including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Boundary line of proposed subdivision, clearly indicated. 2. Size of area to be platted. 3. Name, location and size of public and private streets, sidewalks, railroad right-of-way and drainage and utility easements and any other easements and their purpose. 4. Boundary lines and ownership of adjoining land. 5. Utilities including, but not limited to, location, size and water mains, storm and sanitary sewers (including rim and invert elevations), fire hydrants, gas lines, electric and telephone poles, street lights, curbs, gutter, culverts, catch basins, manholes and other facilities. 6. Permanent buildings and structures. 7. Topography, showing lakes, water courses, wetlands, and contours at vertical intervals of no more than two feet. All elevation data shall be mean sea level, 1929 USGS or established City datum. 8. Other information, such as soil tests or borings and a historic high water elevation, if requested by the Public Works Division, Community Development Division or the Council to aid in its review. 9. Public improvements of record. 10. Zoning. C. Proposed Subdivision Design Features. 1. Layout and width of proposed streets and utility easements showing street names, lot dimensions, parks and other public areas. The street layout shall include all contiguous land owned or controlled by the subdivider. 2. Proposed use of all parcels. If a proposed ~Preliminary Plat will, upon 8 approval, require a comprehensive plan amendment and/or rezoning, the developer shall submit to the Commtlutty DGvdopmont City Planning Department, at the time of submitting the Preliminary Plat, a petition for the comprehensive plan amendment and/or rezoning. 3. Grading plan with the following required items: A. Plan showing finish grades and surface chaining drainage of all parcels including overall final contours at 2-foot intervals. B. Building pad elevations - The building pad elevation shall be the garage floor elevation. C. Lowest opening elevations D. Proposed lot corner elevations E. Building pad foundation stvle such as walkout. look out. etc. F. All drainage swales and critical drainage areas shall be clearlv identified with grade and spot elevations. G. Preliminary street grades and drainage plan with elevations. H. Existing benchmarks used for surveying grading plan. 4. Other right-of-way or easement locations, width and purpose. 5. Lot layout including size of each lot in square feet, lot lines, lot numbers and block numbers. 6. Size and location of public lands. 7. Zoning and minimum required building setback lines. 8. Preliminary plan of sanitary and storm water sewers with rim and invert elevations, grades and sizes indicated for approval by the Public Works Division. Preliminary plan of water main, valving and hydrants with sizes indicated for approval by the Public Works Division. Sanitary sewer and water service lines stubbed out to the individual lots shall also be shown. 9. Erosion and sedimentation control plans which specify the control measures to be used before, during, and after construction until the soil and slope are stabilized by permanent cover. Erosion control plans shall be designed per City approved standards. 10. Tree plans which specifY the proposed location and s"ecies of trees for the subdivision. Trees plan shall be designed per City approved standards. 11 Landscape plans for cul-de-sac islands, eyebrow islands, and berms. te.12. Key map at small scale showing location of the preliminary plat and other property for at least 600 feet in every direction. 9 t+:13. Draft of special covenants whereby the subdivider proposes to regulate land use in the subdivision and otherwise protect the proposed development. D. Additional City Code requirements for Subdivisions 1:. Compliance with Chapter 10 Land Use Regulations (Zoning) 2. Compliance with Chapter 13 Flood Plain Regulations 3. Compliance with Chapter 15 Stormwater Management 4. Compliance with Chapter 16 Shoreland Management 5. Compliance with Chapter 19 Critical Areas Ordinance 6. Compliance with Chapter 20 Natural Resources Management SUBD.3. FINAL PLAT DATA. A. Existing identification and description data and proposed subdivision design features as required for the Preliminary Plat. B. Boundaries ofthe property; lines of all proposed streets, walkways and alleys, with their width, and any other areas intended for public use. e. Lines of adjoining streets and alleys, with their width and names. D. All lot lines, building lines and easements, with figures showing their dimensions. E. An identification system for all lots and blocks. F. Data required underregulation by the Dakota County Surveyor, i.e., accurate angular and linear dimensions for all lines, angles and curvatures used to describe boundaries, streets, easements and other features. G. Certification by a qualified person to the effect that the Plat represents a survey made by herlhim and that monuments and markers thereon exist as located and that all dimensional and geodetic details are correct. H. Notarized certification by owner, and by all mortgage holders of record, of the adoption of the Plat and the dedication of streets and other public areas. I. Certification showing that all taxes currently due on the property to be subdivided have been paid in full. J. Form for Approval by the Planning Commission: Planning Commission of Hastings, Minnesota This day of Signed Chairperson .20_ 10 Signed Secretary K. Form for approval by the Council: City Council of Hastings, Minnesota This day of , 20_ Signed Mayor Signed City Clerk SEC. 11.05. DESIGN STANDARDS. Generally, design standards shall assure that the layout of the subdivision harmonizes with existing plans affecting the development and its surroundings and shall be in conforrnitywith the city's development objectives for the entire area. No Plat shall be approved for any subdivision which covers an area subject to periodic flooding or which is otherwise poorly drained unless the subdivider agrees to make improvements at developer's sole expense which will, in the opinion of the Public Works Division, make the area completely safe for occupancy, and provide adequate street and lot drainage and which satisfy all flood plain requirements. SUBD. 1. CIRCULATION. A. General Street Design. 1. The design of all streets shall be considered in their relation to the following: existing and planned streets, to reasonable circulation of traffic, to topographic conditions, to runoff of storm water and to the proposed uses of the area to be served. 2. Where new streets extend existing adjoining streets, their projections shall be at the same or greater width, but in no case less than the minimum required width. 3. Where adjoining areas are not subdivided the arrangement of streets in new subdivisions shall make provisions for the proper projection of streets. When a new subdivision adjoins unsubdivided land susceptible to being subdivided, then the new streets shall be carried to the boundaries of such unsubdivided 11 land. B. Street Width and Grades. The following standard of street design shall be followed by the subdivider: Street Minimum Minimum width Maximum Minimum Minimum Catel:orv Ri!!:htofWav of Pavement Grade** Grade Curve Radius Arterial 80 feet 44 feet 4% 0.5% 600 feet Collector 66 feet 40 feet 6% 0.5 % 600 feet Local 60 feet 28 - 36 feet* 8% 0.5% 150 feet Minimmn Minimu111 SttcGt Vv'idth Width Maximtl111 Cat"l!:ory Riaht of ~ay ravWl(,lit Glade. .... Minimmll Glade. Artc-lia1 Collcctol Local 80 fee.t 66 feet 60 fr,e.t 44 fcc.t 4 pC-I Gent 0.5 per cent 40 feGt 6 pel Gwt 0.5 per cent 36 28-36 fcet'" 8 pel eent 0.5 per Gent *To be based on traffic and parking needs determined with approval of the City Council based on recommendation from the Public Works Department. ** for safety considerations a lesser maximum grade may be required at or approaching intersections. C. Cul-de-sacs. Cul-de-sacs shall not be permitted unless there are specifics engineering reasons to require them based on existing property condition. topographv. or natural features. Maximum length of permanent cul-de-sac streets shall be 500 feet measured along the center line from the intersection or origin to end of right-of-way. DaGh Cui-de-sac shall be. plov~ded at the. doscd end ~ith a tmn mound ha~ing a minimum outside. load ~ ay diame.tl:.l of 1 00 fe.c.t, a.ud a IH~lli1llm.u str cet ploperty line diame.te.1 ofl20 fr,e.t. Each Cui de sac shall be designed according to City Standards. Cul-de-Sacs shall be required to have a landscaped islands according to City 12 specifications. ft: Local Streets. Local stw;ts ~llall be so aligned that thel! use by through hame \'I'ill be diseoma~"d. D. Street Jogs. Street jogs with center line offsets ofless than 125 feet shall be avoided. E. Street intersections. Insofar as practical, streets shall intersect at right angles and no intersection shall be at an angle ofless than 75 degrees. It must be evidenced that safe and efficient traffic flow is encouraged. No intersection shall contain more than four (4) corners. F. Reverse Curves. Tangents of at least 100 feet in length shall be introduced between reverse curves on arterial or collector streets and 50 feet on lesser streets. G. Half Streets. Halfstrcets shall be. prohibited except \'I'he!e the Conm:;il finds it to be practic.abk to require the dedie.ati01l onlle oth.:,r half I'I'he.n the. adjoining, pI Ope.lty 15 sttbdi v ided. H. Street Names. Proposed streets obviously in alignment with existing and named streets shall bear the name of such existing streets. In no case shall the name of the proposed street duplicate existing street names, including phonetical similarities. Where a plat extends beyond existing streets, continuity of present street naming scheme shall be maintained. Street names shall be subiect to the approval of the Public Works Director and the Fire Marshall. 1. Private Streets. Public improvements shall not be approved for any private street. Private drives and utilities shall be constructed according to approved City standards and shall be privately maintained. ;[. Local Service Drives. Where a proposed plat is adjacent to a major thoroughfare, the Council may require the developer to provide local service drives along the right-of- way of such facilities or they may require that lots should back on thoroughfares, in which case, vehicular and pedestrian access between the lots and thoroughfares shall be prohibited. K. Access to Arterial and Collector Roadways. Where a proposed plat is adjacent to an arterial or collector roadways as designated by the Hastings Comprehensive Plan, spacing between access points to such thoroughfares of less than 660 feet for collectors and 1,320 feet for arterials shall be avoided except where impractical or impossible due to existing property divisions or topography. 1. Arterial and Collector Road Driveways. Drivewav access to arterial streets is strongly discouraged. Residential driveway access to collector streets should be avoided. If residential driveway access to arterial or collector streets is approved due to specific engineering reasons. topolp'aphv or natural features. a 35 ft. setback from 13 the property line shall be required. and the drivewavs must be constructed with a turnaround. M. Corners. Curb lines at street intersections shall be rounded at a radius of not less than 15 feet. N. Alleys. Alleys 5h~1l b" prohibited uh1css 5pu,ial pwnission ~s gIantGd by thG ConnGil rvI th"il provisloii. May be permitted as part of planned residential developments (PRD). O. Hardship to Owners of Adjoining Property. The street arrangements shall be such as to cause no hardship to owners of adjoining property in platting their own land and providing convenient access to it. P. Pedestrian System. A pedestrian walkway shall be provided between lots where required by the City Council to allow for pedestrian accessibility to streets or public service areas. These pedestrian ways shall be graded to allow construction of concrete sidewalks or bituminous paths thereon and to meet established grades. SUBD. 2. EASEMENTS. A. Utilities. Easements at least 10 feet wide along front and side-corner lot lines as well as centered on rear and side lot lines shall be provided for drainage and utilities where necessary. Easements for water main, storm or sanitary sewers shall be at least 20 feet wide. They shall have continuity of alignment from block to block. Temporary construction easements may be required where installation depths are greater than 10 feet. Drainage and utilities easements shall be kept free of any vegetation which would interfere with the free movement of utilities service vehicles and/or water flow. Vegetation and fences placed in utility easements by the property owner are done so at the property owner's risk. Fences and vegetation may be removed at the owner's expense bv the Citv to work within the easement. B. Trail Easements - Trail easements shall be recorded with plats and will be sized and located according to the City's sidewalk and trails plan. C. Water Courses. When a subdivision is traversed by a water course, drainage ways, channel or stream, there shall be provided a storm water easement or drainage right of way conforming substantially with the lines of such water courses, and with such further width or construction as may be determined to be necessary by the Public Works Division. No fences. structures. or vegetation shall be allowed that would 14 block the water course. SUED. 3. BLOCKS A. Length. Block lengths shall not exceed 1,200 feet and shall not be less than 400 feet. B. Pedestrian Ways. In blocks longer than 600 feet, a pedestrian crossway easement or right of way with a minimum width of20 feet may be required near the center of the block. The use of additional access ways to schools, parks and other destinations may be required. SUED. 4. LOTS A. Layout. Where possible, side lot lines shall be at right angles to straight street lines or radial to curved street lines. Lots with frontage on two parallel local streets shall be prohibited. B. Size and Dimension. Minimum lot area and lateral dimensions shall be as set forth in Chapter 10. C. Corner Lots. Corner lots shall be platted at least 10 percent wider than the minimum lot width required. D. Natural Features. When subdividing land, due regard shall be shown for all natural features which if preserved will add attractiveness and stability to the proposed development and which may alter normal lot platting. E. Lots Along Thoroughfares. There shall be no direct vehicular access from residential lots to an arterial street, and residential lots shall be separated from arterial streets and railroad right-of-ways by a 25 foot buffer strip, which may be in the form of added depth or width of lots backing on or siding on the thorovghfares or railroad right-of-way. F. Lot Remnants. Lot remnants which are below the minimum lot size must be added to adjacent or surrounding lots rather than be allowed to remain as an unusable outlot or parcel unless the owner can show plans for the future use of such remnant. SEC. 11.06. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. The subdivider shall be required to provide the following improvements unless the City elects to provide any of the required improvements as specified under the provisions ofSubd. 15 8 ofthis Section. SUBD. 1. MONUMENTS. Steel monuments shall be placed at all block corners, lot comers. angle points, points of curves in streets and at intermediate points as shown on the Final Plat. Such installation shall be the subdivider's expense and responsibility. All U.S., State, County, or other official bench marks, monuments, or triangulation stations in or adj acent to the property shall be preserved in precise position. All monuments displaced, damaged or removed during grading operations shall be replaced by the developer. The monuments shall be installed after the final grading has been completed. The subdivider shall provide reauired certification of installation to the County. A copv ofthis certification shall also be sent to the City. SUBD. 2. STREETS. A. Grading. Streets shall be graded to the full width of the right-of-way in accordance with street grades submitted to and approved by the Public Works Division. All street grading and gravel base construction will be in accordance with specifications on file in the Public Works Division. Grading will be complete prior to installation of applicable underground utilities, either private or public in nature. Gravel base construction shall be undertaken after completion of the installation of underground utilities. B. Surfacing. Following Public Works Division approval of street grading and after utility installation, streets shall be surfaced and provided with concrete curbs and gutters in accordance with the latest recommended plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works Division, approved by the Council, and on file at the City. C. Boulevard Sod - The developer shall install a 3 ft striP of sod directlv behind the curb as part of the street construction process. This boulevard sod strip shall be planted prior to the development being approved for building permits. If weather or sod supplv does not allow the sod to be installed before building permits are reauested. then the developer shall provide the City a letter of credit for the sod installation and shall install the sod as soon as feasible. SUBD. 3. UTILITIES. 16 A. Sanitary Sewer. Sanitary Sewer facilities adequate to serve the subdivision shall be installed in accordance with the latest plans and specifications of the Public Works Division and shall meet the requirements of the master plan for sanitary sewer extensions of the City. Minimum size sanitary sewer in any street shall be 8" diameter. The developer must pay the total cost of sanitary sewer through 10" diameter size if this greater size is required by the Public Works Division. LatgCI thatl 10" dia.llGte,! size, pipe, when Iequi!e,d, may ~n the, disGle,tion oHile, CounGil be, Mscsse,d o~e,! thG ate,a benGntted whie,h may Indttde, latld outside of the. sttbdi vision tmde,l considcration If the. sanitaty sew,-! is installed tmde,! a City imp!ovcllKllt pI oj cct. Larger than 10" diameter size pipe. when required shall be funded through the use of Citv SAClInterceptor Sewer funds. The oversizing cost for developer constructed public sanitarY sewer mains shall be determined by the Public Works Director and paid to the developer upon construction and acceptance of the sewer mams B. Water Supply. Water distribution facilities adequate to serve the subdivision including pipe, fittings, hydrants, valves, etc. shall be installed. All water mains shall be installed in accordance with the requirements with the latest plans and specifications of the Public Works Division and shall meet the requirements of the master plan for water main extensions of the City. Minimum size water main in any street shall be 6" diameter. The developer must pay the total cost of water main through 8" diameter size. La1~cr than 8" dianle.te,l mains, whm Iequiled, may in the, diSCI ction oHIle, CowKil be a5s"ssed 0 v CI the at "a bwditted w hleh may indude, land outside, of tile subdivision und"I e,onside,!ation if tile, wat"l supply is instaUed wldcl a City Improve,illcnt project. Larger than 8" diameter size pipe. when required shall be funded through the use of City WAC funds. The oversizing cost for develo,!,er constructed public water mains shall be determined bv the Public Works Director and paid to the developer upon construction and acceptance of the water mains. SUED. 4. DRAINAGE FACILITIES. Storm sewer, ponding basins, and or other surface drainage facilities shall be installed as determined to be necessary by the Public Warks Division for the proper drainage of surface waters. No storm drainage shall be carried over the street surface for a distance greater than 500 feet. Storm drainage shall be assessed pursuant to Section 6.20 ofthe City Code. 17 SUBD. 5. TREE PLANTlNGS . A. Tree Requirements - A streetlboulevard tree shall be required for every 50 linear ft of street frontage in a subdivision. One front yard tree shall also be required for every lot in the subdivision. The subdivider shall submit a tree plan indicating the location and species of trees. Only those varieties of trees approved by the COlll1Hufht} D~ v dopmcnt Di ~ il.~on City Forester will be used. The minimum size shall measure 1-112 inches in diameter at ground line. No trees shall be planted within 30 feet ofthe intersection of curb lines on corner lots B. Time of Tree Planting - The front yard tree and boulevard trees as identified on the approved tree plan shall be planted prior to a residence receiving a certificate of occupancy. If it is not practical to plant trees because of inclement weather. the builder or owner shall provide a cash escrow. bond. or letter of credit in the amount of 125 percent of the estimated cost ofthe tree(s) and installation. C. Front Yard Trees - The front yard trees shall be planted on private property five (5) to 15 feet inside the property line and not in the utility and drainage easement, "side strip" or "boulevard". No trees shall be planted within 30 feet of the intersection of curb lines on corner lots. The ulillimmn sizc shall mCa5u1e two il1Chcs in dianletC! at glotllld lIne. Ofily those valicties applovcd by the Cotll1lltl1lity Dc~dopm~nt Divisivn Ciry FvI~stOl ~~ll bG nsed. SUBD. 6. SIDEWALKS AND DRIVEWAYS. A. Grading of boulevards in all new developments shall be accomplished so as to accommodate construction of sidewalks thereon regardless of whether said boulevard is part of the Sidewalk Plan on file at City Hall. Any sidewalk located in the plat shall be dedicated to the public. Any sidewalks constructed in any subdivision shall be in accordance with specifications established by the Public Works Division. Sidewalks shall be a minimum of five feet in width, and located one foot off the property line in the street right of way. 18 B. Each and every driveway shall be constructed in accordance with specifications established bv the Public Works Division. If a sidewalk is to be constructed, the concrete driveway shall extend through to the property line side of the walk. The remainder of the driveway shall be concrete or asphalt from the end of the concrete apron to the garage. In cases where driveways are constructed after curbing and sidewalks are in place, the sidewalk shall be reconstructed in accordance with driveway specifications for the width of the driveway. C. Parking areas shall be designed so as to provide an adequate means of access to a public alley or street. Said driveway access shall not exceed 24 feet in width for residential uses and 32 feet in width for commercial, industrial or office uses at the public right-of-way line and shall be so located as to cause the least interference with traffic movement. Driveway widths up to 50 feet will permitted only by special permission of the Public Works Division. All off-street parking spaces shall have access off driveways and not directly off a public street. For commercial and industrial properties, no more than two (2) driveways shall be permitted along the street frontage of each lot. There will be no parking on any streets serving an industrial or commercial facility other than in an emergency. D. All single-family homes, duplexes, 4-plexes, townhomes, and townhouse quadriminiums developed as part of plats approved after January 1, 1994 shall be required to have mail delivery serviced by United States Postal Service approved Neighborhood Delivery and Collection Box units or similar City approved grouped boxes. Individual mail boxes will be permitted only upon receiving handicap exemption status from the Hastings area office of the United States Postal Service, with appeal rights to the St. Paul district office of the United States Postal Service. Mailbox unit foundations and concrete pads shall be constructed with the development's street improvements, and in accordance with the latest recommended plans and specifications prepared by the Public Works Division and on file at City Hall. The location and number of mailbox units will be determined by the Public Works Director in consultation with the U.S. Post Office. Source: Ordinance 360, Second Series Effective Date: 7-7-94 SUED. 7. SPECIFICATIONS - INSPECTIONS. 19 A. Unless otherwise stated, all of the required improvements shall conform to engineering standards and specifications as required by the City. Such improvements shall be subject to inspection and approval by, and shall be made in sequence as determined by the Public Works Division. Plans and specifications for the required improvements shall be submitted to the Public Works Division in a type and format specified bv the Public Works Division for review and approval. The required improvement plan review fee as established by Citv Council resolution shall be paid at this time. B. Grading Inspection - All development site grading one acre in size or larger shall be inspected bv a City designated grading inspector. who will review and inspect maintenance of erosion control measures and compliance with City standards. and the approved grading plan and specifications. The Developer contracting these grading improvements will be required to post a cash escrow with the City of Hastings in the amount of 135% of the estimated cost ofthe inspection services prior to receiving approval to commence grading. The estimated cost of inspection services shall be determined by the Public Works Director. The City will pav all grading inspection costs incurred from these escrowed funds. and furnish the Developer with copies of all invoices received. The Citv will also charge 10% of the consultant fees to cover City overhead and administrative costs connected to the consultant ins?ection services. Excess funds will be returned to the Develo?er upon completion of the grading proiect. If the funds deposited with the City are insufficient to cover the inspection costs. the Developer will be required to deposit additional funds with the City to cover the estimated overage. The Uniform Building Code grading permit fee will be waived for those grading proiects that require a gradin~ inspection cash escrow. C. As-Built Grading Plan - Upon completion of site grading. the Developer shall submit to the Public Works Division for review. an as-built grading plan in a type and format specified by the Public Works Division showing the newly graded elevations at all lot corners. critical elevations in drainageways. one foot contours at ponding and sedimentation basins. and at ponding level control points for ponding basin emergency overflow swales. D. Inspection of Public Improvements - Construction of all subdivision street and utility improvements and other required subdivision improvements shall be inspected by a City designated inspector for compliance with City standards. and the approved improvement plans and specifications. The Developer contracting these improvements will be required to post a cash escrow with the CitvofHastings in the amount of135% of the estimated cost of the inspection services prior to receiving approval to commence construction. The 20 estimated cost of inspection services shall be determined by the Public Works Director. The City will pay all improvement inspection costs incurred from these escrowed funds. and furnish the Developer with cOTlies of all invoices received. The City will also charge 10% of the consultant fees to cover Citv overhead and administrative costs connected to the inspection services. Excess funds will be returned to the Developer upon completion and acceptance of the improvement proiect. Ifthe funds deposited with the City are insufficient to cover the inspection costs. the Developer will be required to deposit additional funds with the City to cover the estimated overage. E. As-Built Improvement Plan - Upon completion ofthe required public improvements. the Citv inspector shall Tlrepare a record as-built drawing of the constructed improvements. SUBD. 8. Required Surety A. Developer Financed and Constructed Improvements: Prior to installation of improvements required under Subd. 11.06 of this chapter that are to be furnished and installed bv the Developer. the Developer shall Tlrovide the Citv a letter of credit cash escrow. or other approved form of suretv. in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of furnishing and installing the required improvements. This suretv shall be used to cover failure ofthe Developer to construct the improvement in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and City standards. or failure complete the improvements as approved. B. City Financed and Constructed Improvements: To request the City to design and construct improvements required under Section 11.06. the Developer must submit a petition for all improvements required as part ofthe development in accordance with State Law. The petition must be submitted prior to October 15th of the vear Tlreceding the construction of improvements. Upon acceptance of the petition bv the Citv Council and prior to commencement of City work on the improvement design. the Developer must post a letter of credit cash escrow. or other approved form of surety with the City of Hastings in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of engineering services to prepare a feasibilitv study and plans and specifications. and to provide construction inspection. staking and contract management for the improvement proiect. This surety shall be used to cover Citv costs incurred for the design and construction of improvements should the Developer fail to complete the platting and grading ofthe proposed development by August 1 of the vear in which the City Council ordered the improvements constructed. 21 C. Maintenance Bond: Prior to accepting or approving the completed Develo?er financed and constructed grading and/or street and utilitv improvements. the Developer must submit a maintenance bond from his contractor in the amount of 20% of the improvement costs. covering a period of one year after City acceptance of the improvements. D. City Financed Improvements: To request the City to design and construct improvements required under Section 11.06 the subdivider must submit a petition for all improvements required as part of the subdivision in accordance with State Law. The petition form may be secured from the Public Works Division. The petition must be submitted prior to October 1 st of the year preceding the construction of improvements. The total maximum allowable costs, for complete improvements as required by this Chapter, which can be financed by City assessment procedures within any plat of subdivision per lot or parcel is determined by the City Council. The assessment shall be spread over a number of years as prescribed by the Council and that the unpaid balance shall bear interest in accordance with the statutes ofthe State of Minnesota in effect at that time. The cost of said improvements shall be the estimated cost for said improvements as computed by the Public Works Division. Any cost exceeding the amount authorized to be assessed by the City Council per lot or parcel shall be paid by the subdivider, in accordance with the following: 1. The subdivider shall submit prior to construction of improvements an executed subdivision development contract as required under paragraph "B" ofthis subdivision and the required cash escrow or performance bond to insure payment of costs. 2. Any variance from the required escrow procedure herein specified, because of unique development or true and certified higher land values or larger than average size lots as platted, but not to include higher improvements costs as a result of street alignment grades or soil conditions, resulting in higher construction costs, will be considered as stated in Section 11.08, Subdivision 3 "Variances". F. Privately Constructed Improvements; In the event the subdivider elects to pay one hundred percent (100%) of all costs incurred by installation of the improvements required under Subd. 11.06, outside of the normal assessment procedure, he may do so providing he complies with the following requirements: 1. All construction shall be in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Division. 2. The subdivider must retain a registered civil engineer to design and inspect the 22 improvements and to certify that the improvements were constructed in accordance with the approved plans. 3. Complete the required improvements within a two year period. 4. Provide the City with reproducible as-built drawings ofthe improvements within two months of completion of the improvements. SUBD. 9. REQUIREMENTS FOR A BUILDING PERMIT. A. No building permit shall be granted on the platted ?roperty until such time as certified copy of the recorded plat has been filed with the Citv and production of proof that all conditions of plat approval have been met. In a case where the City of Hastings is a party to the platting. a copy of the plat certified by the City Clerk as true and correct shall satisfv the requirements ofthis section. B. No building permit shall be granted on the platted property until such time that the subdivider provides the City with a certified survev indicating that the entire site as shown on the preliminary and final plats has been graded pursuant to the approved elevations shown on the preliminary and final plats. C. No building permit shall be granted on platted propertv until the bituminous base course has been constructed. sod behind the curb and gutter installed. and sanitary sewer. water main and storm sewer improvements tested and accepted Source: Ordinance #321 Effective Date: May 7, 1992 (Entire Section 11.01 thru 11.06 has been repealed and new sections adopted) Sec. 11.99. VIOLA nON A MISDEMEANOR. Every person violates a section, subdivision, paragraph or provision of this Chapter when he performs an act thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, or fails to act when such failure is thereby prohibited or declared unlawful, and upon conviction thereof, shall be punished as for a misdemeanor except as otherwise stated in specific provisions hereof. 23 PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Hastings City Council on this 2001. day of Michael D. Werner, Mayor ATTEST: Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/ City Clerk 24 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of an ordinance presented to and adopted by the City of Hastings, County of Dakota, Minnesota, on the of 2001, as disclosed by the records of the City of Hastings on file and of record in the office. Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant! City Clerk ( SEAL) This instrument drafted by: City of Hastings 101 4th ST. Hastings, MN 55033 25 VIII-B-4 Memo To: Mayor Werner and City Council From: Matthew Weiland, City Planner Subject: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EA W) - South Pines IV Date: March 29, 2001 cc: Don Lawrence Lawrence Builders have submitted an EA W for a proposed residential project named South Pines IV. The project located in the southeastern part of the City on the west side ofHWY 316. The residential project will consist of 218 single family homes and 104 townhomes for a total of 322 units. The total project area consists of 123 acres. Only 80 acres are within the City limits. The land outside the City limits is not included in the City's 2020 Future Growth plan. The property within the City limits is within the City's Municipal Urban Service Area (MUSA) except for the northen edge which was recently annexed. This EA W is required for this development based on the size ofthe project. EA W Process The purpose of the EA W is to rapidly assess the environmental effects which may be associated with the proposed project which will then serve as an aid in determining whether or not a an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) is required. City staff has worked with the applicant to prepare the EAW and have verified the accuracy ofthe information provided by the applicant. The City Council is required to authorize the publication and distribution of the EA W to the required parties on the distribution list as determined by the Environmental Quality Board (EQB). A notice ofthe EA W will also be placed in the local paper and published in the EQB Monitor. After theEA W is released for distribution, there is a 30 day comment period in which the governmental agencies and citizens may comment on the accuracy of the EA Wand ask for more information. After the 30 day comment period, the City Council will formally vote to determine if an EIS is needed or not. The City Council's decision to publish and distribute the EA W does not grant any approvals to the proposed project. It is just a part of the formal review process. However, the City Council may not approve any part ofthe proposed project until a determination has been made on whether or not an EIS is required. Page 2 1. Project Outline The proposed residential project will require the following approvals in addtion to the EAW. 1. ' Comp Plan Amendment/MUSA expansion approval 2. Rezoning Approvm 3. Pre1iminaryIFinal Plat 4. Site Plan Approval The following is a time line for the EA W process Proposed Time line 1. 4/2/01 - . City Council Approves EA W for Distribution to required agencies 2. 4/6/01 - Notice of EA W is published in Hastings Star Gazette 3. 4/2/01 - Notice of EA Wis published in EQB Monitor 4. 5/2101 - 30 day comment period ends 5. 5/7/01 - City Votes on need for EA W Requested Action: Motion to recommend approval ofthe publication and distribution of the South Pines IV EAW > 5 c: 00._ m a.>1U- .~ t) a. 0..00. .c:....JE "5200 0'- (f)(f) i. . HI .., "I' .tt.... -g~. J ii!~ Gl iJ 1 H ~~ t ~ Li~~HLd~~:f io"L"33~3L J ~ ~ .....O,~... :~::. w Z-<r- :: t :1 :; ~ t ~ Co :c .. e ~ l- e .. .c f .. :E >. Q) C: :::J (J) C'O +-' o c: .~ .~ .c: I- Co :E .. e ~ o l- e .. .c f .. :E .. u Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) NOTE TO PREPARERS This worksheet is to be completed by the Responsible Governmental Unit (RGU) or its agents. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data necessary for the worksheet, but is not to complete the final worksheet itself. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. For assistance with this worksheet contact the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board EQB) at (612) 296-8253 or (toll- free) 1-800-452-9747 (ask operator for the EQB environmental Review Program) or consult "EAW Guidelines," a booklet available from the EQB. NOTE TO REVIEWERS Comments must be submitted to the RGU (see item 3) during the 30 day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. (Contact the RGU or the EQB to learn when the comment period ends.) Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information, potential impacts that may warrant further investigation, and the need for an EIS. If the EAW has been prepared for the scoping of an EIS (see item 4), comments should address the accuracy and completeness of the information and suggest issues for investigation in the EIS. 1. Project Title: South Pines IV Subdivision 2. Proposer: Geoffrey G. Griffin Contact person: Address: 241 North Winona St Chatfield, MN 55923 Phone: 507-282-2683 3. RGU: City of Hastings Contact person: Matthew Weiland Address: Phone: 101 East 4th Street Hastings, MN 55033 651-437-4127 4. Reason for EAW Preparation o ETS scoping 0 Mandatory EAW 0 Citizen petition 0 RGU discretion 0 Proposer volunteered If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category number(s): 4410.4300, subp. 19 5. Project Location SE Yo Section 3 Township 114N Range 17W County: Dakota CityfTwp: Hastings Attach copies of each of the following to the EA W: a. a county map showing the general location of the project; b. copy(ies) of USGS 7.5 minute, 1 :24,000 scale map (photocopy is OK) indicating the project boundaries; c. a site plan showing all significant project and natural features. 6. Description: a. Provide a 50 or fewer word abstract for use in EQB Monitor notice: A 123 acre project consisting of 119 acres of single family residential development with 218 single family homes and 104 townhomes, and 3 acres of parkland. Existing land use is agricultural. Municipal sewer and water will serve the site. b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and ancillary facilities (attach additional sheets as necessary). Emphasize construction and operation methods and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or produce wastes. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities. This 122.54 acre project consists of 93.18 acres of single family residential development, 29.36 acres of townhome Page 1 of 7 development and 2.71 acres of parkland. Residential development consists of 218 single family homes averaging 2.34 units per acre and 104 townhomes averaging 3.54 units per acre. Development will occur in 6 phases spaced out over approximately 6 years. Construction of streets and homes will involve minimal tree removal and will temporarily disturb the soil. City sewer and water service will serve the lots. Streets will have curb and gutter and storm water will discharge into 8 detention basins prior to leaving the site. 7. Project Magnitude Data 123 Acres Total 3 Acres Parkland or Length (miles) Total Project Area (acres) Number of Residential Units Unattached 218 Attached 104 8. Permits and Approvals Required: List all known local, state, and federal permits, approvals, and funding required: Minnesota Pollution Control A enc Minnesota Pollution Control A enc Minnesota Department of Health MnDOT City of Hastings City of Hastings City of Hastings City of Hastings City of Hastings City of Hastings Metropolitan Council San ita Sewer Extensions and/or Chan es General Storm Water Permit for Construction Activi Plan Review Fees for watermains Street Connection at Tuttle Drive Preliminary/Final Plat Rezoning Grading Permit Site Plan Approval Building Permit Utility Connection Permit MUSA Expansion 9. Land Use: Describe current and recent past/and use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss the compatibility of the project with adjacent and nearby land uses; indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify 'any potential environmental hazard due to past land uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks. Historical land use has been agricultural with an abandoned farmstead on approximately 10 acres on the north side of the property. Surrounding land use includes urban to the north, and agricultural to the south, west, and east. There are no foreseeable compatibility problems with surrounding uses. There are no identifiable environmental hazards due to . past land use. (See attached exhibit) 10. Cover Types: Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after development before and after totals should be e ual: T es 2 to 8 Wetlands Wooded/Forest Brush/Grassland Cro land 11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources a. Describe fish and wildlife resources on or near the site and discuss how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. Wildlife found on the site would be the typical agricultural land species such as pheasants, rabbits, songbirds, etc. Pheasants will be pushed off the sight. Eventually songbirds and small mammals will have urban landscaping as habitat. There will be more trees and diversity of vegetation after development. b. Are there any state listed endangered, threatened, or special-concern species; rare plant communities; colonial waterbird nesting colonies; native prairie or other rare habitat; or other sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? DYes 0' No A search of the Minnesota Natural Heritage database was conducted by the Minnesota DNR for the site. Based on Page 2 of 7 this review no known occurrences of rare or natural communities. (See attached correspondence) 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources: Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration (dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, impoundment) of any surface water (lake, pond, wetland, stream, drainage ditch)? DYes ItI No 13. Water Use a. Will the project involve the installation or abandonment of any wells? ItIYes 0 No For abandoned wells give the location and Unique well number. For new wells, or other previously unpermitted wells, give the location and purpose of the well and the Unique well number (if known). A site inventory revealed one abandoned domestic well located in the farmstead on the north portion of the site. A copy of the abandoned well record is attached. See the attached map for wells located in the within one half mile of the site. Well information was derived from the County Well Index. RICHARD STIEN ONZEMIUS, JOHN HAROLD DUNKEL FOXWORTHS, DAVID MURPHY,PAUL CONST DABELOW BUICK b. Will the project require an appropriation of ground or surface water (Including dewatering)? DYes ItI No c.' Will the project require connection to a public water supply? ItI Yes DNo If yes, identify the supply, the DNR water appropriation permit number of the supply, and the quantity to be used. The water supplier for the development will be the City of Hastings. DNR appropriation permit number 756194. When fully developed approximately 74,000 gallons per day will be used in .the development. 14. Water-related land Use Management Districts: Does any part of the project site involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100 year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? DYes 621 No 15. Water Surface Use: Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? DYes ItI No 16. Soils Approximate depth (In feet) to: Ground water: minimum >6 ft. average > 6 ft. Bedrock: minimum > 60 ft. average > 60 ft. Describe the soils on the site, giving SCS classifications, if known. (SCS interpretations and soil Boring logs need not be attached.) (See attached exhibit) AUKEGAN SILT LOAM, 0 TO 1 % SLOPES No AUKEGAN SILT LOAM, 2 TO 6 % SLOPES No ADENA LOAM, 0 TO 2 % SLOPES No ADENA LOAM, 2 TO 6 % SLOPES No 17. Erosion and Sedimentation Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: ~acres 225,000 ; cubic yards Page 3 of 7 Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe the erosion and sedimentation measures to be used during and after construction of the project. NRCS HELC soils are identified in the table above and shown on the attached map. Development of the site will be done in six phases. Erosion control measures such as silt fences, ditch bale checks, and diversions will be employed to control sedimentation during construction. After construction the site will be immediately topsoiled and revegetated. Eight permanent runoff and sediment control structure will be constructed. All requirements of the General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity, as required by MPCA, will be followed. 18. Water Quality - Surface Water Runoff a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe methods to be used to manage and/or treat runoff. Runoff from the site will be equal to or less than pre-development conditions. This will be accomplished with storm sewers which outlet into runoff and sediment control basins located throughout site. The detention basins are designed to detain the runoff from a 10 year 24 hour storm. The basins are will have 3 feet of storage allowing a portion of the runoff to infiltrate rather than runoff. (See attached exhibit) b. Identify the routers) and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site. Estimate the impact of the runoff on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the runoff may affect a lake consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a nutrient budget analysis is needed.) Runoff will be collected in storm sewers which outlet into eight runoff and sediment control basins. The basins outlet into unnamed drainage ways which eventually outlet into the Vermillion River. The entire site is located in the Vermillion River watershed and DNR major watershed 38 and minor watershed 28. The detention basins are designed to meet MPCA's NPDES water quality criteria for detention basins and City of Hastings Ordinances, Chapter 15, Storm Water Management. Water quality should be the same or improve after development. The site has historically been used for agriculture and been in a continuous corn-soybean rotation. Factors affecting water quality include sediment, fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. Post development will be typical residential development with contaminants coming from road runoff and lawn chemicals. Water quality would improve with proper turf management and road maintenance. 19. Water Quality - Wastewaters. a. Describe sources, quantities, and composition (except for normal domestic sewage) of all sanitary and industrial wastewaters produced or treated at the site. Wastewaters will be those typical of urban residential development. b. Describe any waste treatment methods to be used and give estimates of composition after treatment, or if the project involves onsite sewage systems, discuss the suitability of the site conditions for such systems. Identify receiving waters (including ground water) and estimate the impact of the discharge on the quality of the receiving waters. (If the discharge may affect a lake consult "EAW Guidelines" about whether a nutrient budget analysis is needed.) All wastewaters will be treated at the City of Hastings Wastewater Treatment Plant. c. If wastes will be discharged into a sewer system or pretreatment system, identify the system and discuss the ability of the system to accept the volume and composition of the wastes. Identify any improvements which will be necessary. All wastes will be discharged to the City of Hastings sanitary sewer system. Existing mains and treatment facilities are sized to handle this project and more. 20. Ground Water - Potential for Contamination a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: > 50 ft. minimum; >50 ft average. b. Describe any of the following site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes; shallow limestone formations/karst conditions; soils with high infiltration rates; abandoned or unused wells. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. Page 4 of 7 The Dakota County Geologic Atlas shows that the Prairie du Chein Group is the first encountered bedrock on the majority of the site. The Jordon sandstone is first encountered on the very southern edge of the site. There are no sinkholes on or within one mile of the site. There is a low probability of sinkhole development. The geologic sensitivity is rated high. Depth to bedrock ranges from 50 to 100 feet on the northern portion of the site to 200 to 250 feet on the southern portion. (See the attached Bedrock Geology and Depth to Bedrock maps) Surficial geology is glacial till from the Des Moines lobe. Groundwater contamination due to a change to residential development is unlikely. The site in not located within any of the City of Hastings well capture zones. c. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present on the project site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating ground water. Petroleum products for the machinery used to prepare the site would be only hazardous materials other than normal residential products. 21. Solid Wastes; Hazardous Wastes; Storage Tanks a. Describe the types, amounts, and composftions of solid or hazardous wastes to be generated, including animal manures, sludges and ashes. Identify the method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste indicate if there will be a source separation plan; list type(s) and how the project will be modified to allow recycling. Mixed municipal solid waste will be generated by homeowners living in the development. County Solid waste ordinances requiring source separation will apply. b. Indicate the number, location, size, and use of any above or below ground tanks to be used for storage of petroleum products or other materials (except water). No above or below ground storage tanks are planned. 22. Traffic: A traffic study for this project was prepared by Benshoof & Associates on February 22, 2001. This study is included i11 the Appendix of this EA W. 23. Vehicle-related air emissions: Provide. an . estimate of the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on. air quality impacts. The proposed development doesn't exceed thresholds for an ISP and is therefore assumed to have a low potential for degrading air quality. 24. Stationary source air emissions: Will the project involve any stationary sources of air emissions (such as boilers or exhaust stacks)? DYes Ii'I No 25. Will the project generate dust, odors, or noise during construction and/or operation? Ii'IYes D No If yes, describe the sources, characteristics, duration, and quantities or intensity, and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify the locations of sensitive receptors in the vicinity and estimate the impacts on these receptors. Fugitive dust and heavy machinery noise will be generated during site grading and road construction. Dust emissions should only affect off site receptors if windy conditions are present. Dust suppressants and revegetation are the primary tools for minimizing dust. Phasing of construction will also reduce fugitive emissions. Equipment will only be operated during daytime hours. Potential receptors would be the residential areas to the north of the site. 26. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? a. archeological, historical, or architectural resources? DYes Ii'I No b. prime or unique farmlands? Ii'IYes D No c. designated parks, recreation areas, or trails? DYes Ii'I No d. scenic views and vistas? DYes Ii'I No e. other unique resources? DYes Ii'I No Page 5 of 7 If any items are answered Yes, describe the resource and identify any impacts on the resource due to the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. The two primary soil types found on the site are Wadena Loam and Waukegan Silt Loam. Both are listed by NRCS as prime farmland. The project will remove 100% of these soils from agricultural production. There are no measures which will preserve these soils for agricultural production other than to not develop the site. 27. Will the project create adverse visual impacts? (Examples include: glare from intense lights; lights visible in wilderness areas; and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks.) DYes 0 No 28. Compatibility with plans: Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive land use plan or any other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of an local, regional, state, or federal agency? 0Yes DNo If yes, identify the applicable plan(s), discuss the compatibility of the project with the provisions of the plan(s), and explain how any conflicts between the project and the plan(s) will he resolved. if no, explain. This project will be subject to the Hastings Comprehensive Land Use Plan and is part of the Metro Utility Service Area(MUSA). The south 41 acres is currently outside the Hastings City limits and MUSA. The project has been planned and designed so that the phases within the City limits will be developed before annexation of the southern 41 acres and extension of the MUSA is required. 29. Impact on infrastructure and Public Services: Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure, or public services be required to serve the project? 0Yes D No If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure/services needed. (Any infrastructure that is a "connected action" with respect to the project must be assessed in this EAW; see "EAW Guidelines" for details.) Municipal sewer and water will be connected to existing municipal sewer and water to the east of the site. The existing infrastructure is adequately sized to handle this project. 30. Related Development; cumulative Impacts: a. Are future stages of this development planned or likely? DYes 0 No b. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? DYes 0 No c. Is other development anticipated on adjacent lands or outlots? DYes 0 No d. If a, b, or c were marked Yes, discuss any cumulative environmental impacts resulting from this project and the other development. 31. Other Potential Environmental Impacts: If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts which were not addressed by items I to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. '2. SUMMARY OF ISSUES (This section need not be completed if the EAW is being done for EIS scoping; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document which must accompany the EAW) List any impacts and issues identified above that may further investigation before the project is commenced. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or may be considered for these impacts and issues, including those that have been or may be ordered as permit conditions. This project is a typical residential development. There are no features on the site, which would cause great environmental concern. Past land use has not caused environmental damage. Primary environmental concerns are runoff and erosion control during and after construction. Runoff will be controlled by detention basins. Potential erosion problems during construction will be handled with standard erosion control practices and the project will be in compliance with the requirements of the MPCA General Stormwater Permit. The loss of prime farmland is the trade off for a site, which is well suited to both development and agricultural production. Page 6 of 7 CERTIFICATIONS BY THE RGU (all 3 certifications must be signed for EQB acceptance of the EAW for publication of notice in the EQB Monitor) A. I hereby certify that the information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. Signature B. I hereby certify that the project described in this EAW is the complete project and there are no other projects, project stages, or project components, other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as "connected actions" or 'phased actions," as defined, respectively, at Minn. Rules, pts. 4410.0200, subp. 9b and subp. 60. Signature C. I hereby certify that copies of the completed EAW are being sent to all points on the official EQB EAW distribution list. Signature Title of signer Date Page 7 of 7 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, Box 25 500 Lafaycllc Road 51. P,IlII, MlIltlcsota 55155.40 Phone: (651) 296-7863 Fax: (651) 296-1811 E-mail: sarah.hofTman@dnr.state.mn,us March 6,2001 Geoffrey Griffin GGG Engineering 14070 Highway 52 SE Chattield, MN 55923 Re: Request for Natural Heritage information for vicinity of proposed South Pines IV Residential Development, T114N Rl7W Sec. 3, Dakota County. NHNRP Contact #: ERDB 20010796 Dear Mr. Griffin, The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one-mile radius of the area indicated on the map enclosed with your information request. Based on this review, there are 28 known occurrences of rare species or natural communities in the area searched (for details, see enclosed database printout and explanation of selected fields). An area of high biodiversity Bignificance is located east of the project boundaries on the opposite side of Highway 316. This significance site supports numerous rare plants, animals, and natural communities. However, standard construction procedures (e.g. runoff prevention) should ensure that these features remain unaffected by the proposed activity. Please refer to the enclosed Minnesota County Biological Survey Map for Dakota County for the locations of these features. The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, a unit within the Division of Ecological Services, Department of Natural Resources. It is continually updated aB new information becomes available, and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, natural communities, and other natural features. Its purpose is to foster better understanding and protection of these features. Because our information is not based on a comprehensive inventory, there may be rare or otherwise significant natural features in the state that are not represented in the database. A county-by- county survey of rare natural features is now underway, and has been completed for Dakota County. Our information about natural communities is, therefore, quite thorough for that county. However, because survey work for rare plants and animals is less exhaustive, and because there has not been an on-site survey of all areas of the county, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist on the project area. The enclosed results of the database search are provided in two formats: index and full record. To control the release of locational information which might result in the damage or destruction of a rare element, both printout formats are copyrighted. The index provides rare feature locations only to the nearest section, and may be reprinted, unaltered, in an Environmental Assessment Worksheet, municipal natural resource plan, or report compiled by your company for the project listed above. If you wish to reproduce the index for any other purpose, please contact me to request written permission. Copyright notice for the index should DNR Information: 651-296-6157 · 1-888-646-6367 · TIY: 651-296-5484 . 1-800-657-3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity 1ft.. Printed on Recycled Pape' Containing a .,.., Minimum of 10% Post-Gonsume, Waste ~T" . BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 EXC8..SIOR BOUlEVARD, SUITE TWO / HOPKINS, MN 55343/ (952) 238-1667 / FAX (952) 238.1671 February 22,2001 Refer to File 01-08 Mr. Matt Weiland City of Hastings 10 1 4th Street E. Hastings, MN 55033 RE: Results of Traffic Study for South Pines IV Residential Development in Hastings, MN Dear Mr. Weiland: At the request of Mr. Daniel Tilsen, please find attached our traffic report forthe above referenced project. Please contact me with any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. ~ +A.L- Edward F. Terhaar, P.E. Attachment c. Mr. Daniel 1. Tilsen 1IITIF . BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SUITE TWO / HOPKINS, MN 55343/ (952) 238.1667 / FAX (952) 238-1671 February 21, 2001 Refer to File: 01-08 MEMORANDUM TO: Daniel J. Ti1sen, GGG Engineering Surveying & Planning Edward F. Terhaar ff"- FROM: RE: Results of Traffic Study for South Pines IV Residentim Development in Hastings, MN. PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND The purpose of this memorandum is to present the results of our traffic study for the proposed South Pines IV residential development in Hastings. Based on discussions with City staff, our analysis has focused on the following areas: . TH 316/Tutt1e Drive intersection . TH 316/Michae1 Avenue intersection In order to address the operations at the above locations, forecasts and analysis were prepared for the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Proposed Development Characteristics The South Pines IV development is proposed to consists of 218 single family dwelling units and 104 townhouse dwelling units. The development will be located west of T.H. 316 at Tuttle Drive, as shown in Figure 1. Access tolfrom the site will be provided via an extension of Tuttle Drive west ofT.H. 316 and access to Michael Avenue in the southeast corner of the site. The development is expected to be completed by 2006. The majority of the proposed dwelling units are located on property already within the City limits. This area includes approximately 94 single family dwelling units and 104 townhouse units and is known as Phase 1 for purpose of this analysis. The remainder of the single family homes are located on property not currently within City limits. For purpose of our analysis, we have anmyzed the impacts of development of the land within the City limits (phase 1) and the ultimate full development of the site. APPROXIMATE SCAlE E. A E. II th Z tI, ~ ~ '" !iI '" ~ 2 ~ ST. Sl ~ J in . ~ ~ '" ~ . 'n ST. ~ 14 th <> 5 th Sf, .. E. 15 ft: "',,---- "",- ~- T~----. ;- ~- \i c ..J > . ( -~~ ;; ~ <> 5,! " N t I PROJECT LOCATION ;,! ~ lolttLL 1>'1" ~ I o 1800' 1]> GGG ENGINEERING SURVEYING & PLANNING \Xi BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES,INC. V TRAIISPORTATIONENGINEERSANDPLANNERS TRAFFIC STUDY FOR PROPOSED SOUTH PINES IV DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 1 PROJECT LOCATION Mr. Daniel 1. Ti1sen -3- February 21, 2001 Existing Traffic Conditions In order to better understand the existing traffic operations, turn movement volumes were recorded during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours at the T.H. 316/Tuttle Drive and T .R. 316/Michael Avenue intersections. This data was collected on weekdays in February, 2001. The intersection ofT.H. 316 with Tuttle Drive is currently a "T" intersection, with Tuttle Drive approaching from the east. T .H. 316 consists of one left turn lane, one through lane, and one right turn lane in both the northbound and southbound directions. Tuttle Drive consists of a wide westbound approach which operates as two approach lanes. The intersection is controlled with a stop sign on Tuttle Drive. The intersection ofT.H. 316 with Michael Avenue is currently a "T" intersection, with Michael Avenue approaching from the west. T.R 316 consists of one lane in the northbound and southbound directions. Michael Avenue also consists of one approach lane. The intersection is controlled with a stop sign on Michael Avenue. Future Roadwav Svstem As this area continues to develop, changes to the existing roadway system are planned. One specific change that will impact this development is the extension of Tuttle Drive west to T.R. 61. This extension is included in the City's Transportation Plan as a needed collector roadway for this area. However, no time frame has been set for this extension to occur. Therefore, for purpose of our anmysis, we have assumed that the Tuttle Drive extension will not occur by 2006, which is the expected completion date of this development. Our analysis assumes Tuttle Drive will end at the western edge of the subject property. This assumption results in a worst case scenario for the T.H. 316/Tuttle Drive intersection because it forces all of the development traffic through that intersection instead of m10wing some traffic to travel to and from T .H. 61 to the west. Mr. Daniel J. Tilsen -4- February 21, 2001 TRAFFIC FORECASTS Trip Generation For the proposed South Pines IV development, trip generation was estimated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours using information from the Institute o/Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation, (/h Edition. Table I presents the results of the trip generation estimate. Table 1 W kd P k H T. G ti ~ S h P' IV ee ay ea our np enera on or out IDes ArealLand Use Size A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour (dwelling units) Trips In Trips Out Trips In Trips Out South Pines IV (phase 1) Single family 94 19 56 65 37 Townhomes 104 9 44 42 21 Subtotals 28 100 107 58 . South Pines IV (full development) . Single family 218 41 121 139 78 Townhomes 104 9 44 42 21 Subtotms 50 165 181 99 Using the intersection turn movement volumes collected at the anmysis intersections, distribution percentages were developed for new trips to and from the site. These distribution percentages represent the anticipated portion of trips traveling tolfrom the site by direction. We estimate that 90 percent of the trips will be tolfrom the north on T.R. 316 and 10 percent to/from the south on T.R. 316. Traffic Volumes Turn movement volumes were estimated for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours at each of the intersections for the 2003 condition with Phase 1 (2003 phase 1) and 2006 post- development condition (2006 Build). The 2003 and 2006 volumes include increases in traffic associated with other background growth. These estimates include addition of background growth of two percent per year to account for other growth in the area. The background growth of two percent per year is based on historic growth rates on T.R. 316. The resultant volumes are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Mr. Daniel J. Tilsen -5- February 21, 200l ee ay . . ea our urn ovemen o umes Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Location/Scenario L T R L T R L T R L T R T.H. 316/Tuttle Drive 200 I Existing na na na 8 na 95 na 381 17 41 186 na 2003 Phase 1 90 0 8 8 0 99 2 396 18 43 193 25 2006 Post-Development 134 0 12 9 0 105 3 434 19 45 210 40 T.H. 316IMichael Ave. 200 I Existing 5 na 5 na na na 5 393 na na 189 5 2003 Phase 1 5 na 7 na na na 6 411 na na 205 5 2006 Post-Development 21 na 10 na na na 8 435 na na 220 11 Table 2 W kd AM P kH T M tV I ee ay . . ea our urn ovemen o umes Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Location/Scenario L T R L T R L T R L T R T.H. 316/Tuttle Dr. 200 1 Existing na na na 12 na 82 na 324 13 12l 477 na 2003 Phase 1 52 0 5 12 0 85 9 337 14 126 496 96 2006 Post-Development 80 0 7 13 0 90 15 365 14 133 541 147 T.H. 316/Michael Ave. 200 I Existing 5 na 5 na na na 5 332 na na 484 5 2003 Phase I 5 na 6 na na na 7 354 na na 508 5 2006 Post-Development 15 na 9 na na na 9 380 na na 539 22 Table 3 W kd PM P kH T M tV I Mr. Daniel 1. Tilsen -6- February 21, 2001 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Level of Service Both the T.H. 316/Tutt1e Drive and T.R. 316IMichael Avenue intersections were analyzed to determine the effects of additionm traffic generated by construction of the proposed development. Capacity analyses were performed using the methodology presented in the Highway Capacity Manual for the existing, 2003 Phase I and 2006 Post- Development scenarios. Capacity anmysis results are presented in terms of level of service, which ranges from A to F. Level of service A represents the best intersection operation, with very little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. Level of service F represents the worst intersection operation, with excessive delay. The existing lane geometrics were used for the 2003 and 2006 capacity anmyses at each intersection. For the eastbound approach of Tuttle Drive at T.H. 316, we assumed a left. turn lane and a through/right turn lane would be constructed as part of the development. Table 4 presents the level of service anmysis for the weekday a.m. peak hour at each intersection. Under the existing conditions and traffic volumes, m1 intersections operate without any level of service difficulties, with all movements are a level of service B or greater. Under the 2003 Phase 1 scenario, ml movements at ml intersections operate at level of service D or better. Under the 2006 Full Development scenario, all movements at m1 intersections operate at level of service D or better except the eastbound left turn at Tuttle Drive. which operates at level of service E. Under ml scenarios, the overml intersections operate at acceptable levels of service during the a.m. peak hour. ee av . . ea our eve 0 emce esu s AM Peak Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall Hour . Intersection LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT T.H.316/ Tuttle Dr. 200l Existing na na na B na B na A A A A na A 2003 Phase 1 D A A C A B A A A A A A A 2006 Post- E A A C A B A A A A A A A Develooment T.H.316/ Michael Ave. 200 I Existing B na B na na na A A na na A A A 2003 Phase I B na B na na na A A na na A A A 2006 Post- B B A A A A A Develooment na na na na na na Table 4 W kd AM P kH L I fS R It Mr. Daniel J. Tilsen -7- February 21, 2001 Table 5 presents the level of service anmysis for the weekday p.m. peak hour at each intersection. Under the existing conditions and traffic volumes, m1 intersections operate without any level of service difficulties, with all movements are a level of service C or better. Under the 2003 Phase 1 scenario, ml movements operate at level of service D or better except the eastbound movement at Tuttle Drive, which operates at level of service E. Under the 2006 Post-Development scenario, the eastbound and westbound left tums at Tuttle Drive fall to levels of service F and E, respectively, while ml other movements remain at level of service B or better. The capacity analysis indicates that the movements that may experience some level of service difficulty are the left turn movements onto T.R. 316 at the Tuttle Drive intersection. The impact of these movements on the overml operation of the intersection is minor, as the intersection operates at level of service A or B under m1 scenarios. Using the 2003 and 2006 peak hour volumes, the peak hour signm warrant requirements were anmyzed to determine if the forecasted volumes meet the volume thresholds. The 2003 volumes are clearly below the required thresholds for a signm, as is the 2006 a.m. peak hour volume. The 2006 p.m. peak hour volume barely exceeds the peak hour warrant volume threshold. Therefore, we recommend that stop sign control be used initimly, with the volumes monitored as the areas develops to determine if intersection control changes are necessary. ee ay . . ea our eve 0 emce esu ts PM Peak Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall Hour Intersection LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT T.H. 316/ Tuttle Dr. 2001 Existing na na na C na B na A A A A na A 7(\1)3 Phase 1 E B B D B B A A A A A A A I-' :.. ,6 Post- F B B E B B A A A A A A B Develooment T.H.3161 Michael Ave. 2001 Existing B na B na na na A A na na A A A 2003 Phase I B na B na na na A A na na A A A 2006 Post- C C A A A A A Develooment na na na na na na Table 5 W kd PM P k H L I fS R I Mr. Daniel J. Tilsen -8- February 21, 2001 CONCLUSIONS Based on the information presented in this report, we have made the following conclusions: . On an average weekday, the full South Pines IV development is estimated to generate 215 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 280 trips in the p.m. peak hour. The Phase 1 development is estimated to generate l28 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 165 trips in the p.m. peak hour. . The T.H. 316ITutt1e Drive intersection currently provides level of service C or better operations for m1 movements in am. and p.m. peak hours with stop sign control for the Tuttle Drive leg of the intersection. . It is anticipated that the T.H. 316ITutt1e Drive intersection will provide level of service B or better operations for all movements except the eastbound and westbound left turns in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under the 2003 Phase 1 scenario. The eastbound and westbound left turns are expected to operate at levels of service E and D, respectively. . Under the 2006 Post-Development scenario at the T.R. 316ITuttle Drive intersection, the eastbound and westbound left turns fm1 to level of service F and E, respectively, while m1 other movements remain at level of service B or better. The impact of this movement on the overall operation of the intersection is minor, as the intersection operates at level of service A or B under ml scenarios. We recommend that the operations at this intersection be monitored as the area further develops to determine if intersection control changes are necessary. . The intersection of T .R. 316IMichael currently provides level of service B or better operations for m1 movements during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. . The intersection of T .R. 316IMichael Avenue is expected to provide acceptable levels of service for m1 movements during both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours under both the 2003 Phase 1 and 2006 Post-Development scenarios. I hearby certifY that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under ilie;;J4:-R Date~Reg.No. '2..~q4{ CITY OF HASTINGS SOUTH PINES IV USGS Tapa N w E CITY OF HASTINGS SOUTH PINES IV N Site Plan W E CITY OF HASTINGS SOUTH PINES IV N Drainage w CITY OF HASTINGS SOUTH PINES IV N Depth to Bedrock W E CITY OF HASTINGS SOUTH PINES IV N Bedrock Geology W E CITY OF HASTINGS SOUTH PINES IV N Soils W E CITY OF HASTINGS SOUTH PINES IV N Existing Landuse W E CITY OF HASTINGS SOUTH PINES IV N Existing Landuse W E CITY OF HASTINGS SOUTH PINES IV CWI Wells Watershed Boundries W N E ,* I'1V.c:.e:.C' r'.O;::,..-'-:: W€LL O~ BORING LOCATION MINNESOT II OEPARTMENT OF HEAL TH Minnesota WIlli ai1d Bodng f 16 3 3 32:--- C~unlv Nan', WELL AND BORING SEALING RECORD ~~~~~Q~ Unlqu~ wan No. '---' DAKOTA CO. Minn.sota Slatutos, Chspt'r 1031 ~~,r:a~' T;;~;;AN IT7~;N iR'r;~~8CI;N' ~~:.~'; .;, D"~~;~ST 4TH. 2000 0",w'".rBO"ngCOnOlr.cl~940 Nl"tm.,.e4l1 Str..1 Add,... or Flul ~mb.r Il'\CI Olry of Wlli or 8ofll'10 ~Ol;;tlion 16785 REO WING BLVD. HASTINGS. ltN'~Ile'or.S'~llng Sfl,Q. exaet IOeItlOI\ 01 ~I Of' bOt''''; SIC,I=" m..., cl .....!I or bOftng AQ",'Fe"($) If' ..thon QlI~ wtll\ 'X' IQCa:tOt':, ."OWIng ~OPI"Y li,!:n"l. ~qulf.r CJ M""!I4Cjuit8f ~.+.,...j..~.+...t_ \"n::.'d"'''''bUllnil>' i~~~:=We41 o Monh,WOII I ,; ,..,. ft/.; 0 E"II. Bpro Hot. (J Olrllf , ! 1 . W . T - '1-- . r ..t. E '1f-. CASlNCI 1'YP€(SI -+- -+- --~X +- ]"". 01. OJ: $1." 0 Pl..,I. 0 Tile 0 0.... H. -+- +'+1 ,\.."... ~ ~Nl,\.l$I ~ \' ~ IIILl Oi.me'.. 0",,'" f--'~--+ ~~ ....5l..1rl1""".ll..- to~ n. PROPERTVOWNSIl'$NAME .__. .. _,n,I"",,_ to_ n, LAWHkMCE BDIlDERS- INl. p.._......r. molinS8cldtt..n."~1!'I" 1Il..w8(I_lddrm,ft/lre&'''''.- _ In, !yom _ III _ ft, 1317 FRONTAGE ROAD SOUTH HASTINGS~ MINNESOTA 55033 Well oWNER'S NAME LAWRENCE BUILDERS. INC. wetlown.r.""""'odd,_.dV_IIlonPfOPOnvownar. .......10$4'''''._, 1317 FRONTAGE ROAD .nuTH HASTINGS. "I~NESOTA $5033 . ,lIliOt.OCIICAI. MA'la""'L QOI.QIl "MDN,I. OF "'OM TO FOllu.t. TlON II J'OlllncMon,lndiea.. "limING to~t1D"1 toa from "'......04' bol1na. DRtFT LtMf:RllCK . RR SOFT Y~U OW HARD o 4R 48 ~~2 . . . . IIU11ARKI, ~UIIC! 0' DATA,lltf'1llCUL NIIIl IUI.INO ." ,:,.,.;,. ~(. . " .' ,:' ,.. ~ .' ." .. '.:' . '~~,~~'.l':",::: '" I IPORTAtii.!'IL:: ~'J,~;.; rRC,,,,,;;:TtIH 163332 '" ,PEllS-W.L:' :;WNEI? :;0;>'1 I 151 ~" Or191ll0' O.p'h 1 !i~ sTATIC WAT~R LEVEL n ~ Mo".I'I. 0 e."",,,.. 85 h tllIoIOW CI .~.land '"~... s~ In OVOfSlze noll1 Am1u'" IpICt V\lUaJy grout.d? Cl VH IllI No o v.. ON<> n U,*~OW" ------."-. . Cl V'I DN. a v.. ON. o u""..... C::VH ONe .. Cl v,. CI NO CI oJn~n.w. . ICRIiIiNlOPlN MOLE SOr..t'l frOm eo h, Ooon H.1o !yom 4B .. 152 ft, OIlSTlWcnoNS D lIodl/tlfOp Ptpe 0 ~k Valo8(l) ,0.DtbM D FlII JQtl. OtlWIUCllllO 1)101.' Ollitruellono (~rIIle) Oblll\\*ni niQ,0V8d'/ CJ v.. cJ Nil'" bO~ .'~. -- PUMP' , Tlf-, " "SU~-, , ',. .' ex ~m~.d [J Not'preH". a Other ' ~~ ... .....',. r ,! Ml:TMOO USeD TO IU.~ ANNUl.AA ISI'ACl! 81!'1W1iliN 2 CASINGS. OR C:AIIND AND 1I000E HOLIi: QAI1""'II_"- ~'.!:.'. .... i:I """"I.,, 1IIl_ _led willi Inmlo 1lI~ o Catlng Ptlf..-ortIRIlf\OIIt' . T. ,> 1rl.llOlII ft Cl Po"",.l9d O_Oci [J 'PONfGIIIW<I 0 RI_ \0 In, korn It. 10 ~ 01 po_COo' o Ol~ 0Il0UllND MAT$!IlIA4S) lOn' b_u vt_... __ No of ~.ISO Ib,J GleUIin\l'M...nJtEAT eEMERT""", ~ 10152- fl....iL VIIUa _ b.ge ~""'_Io_n._y&f<I._MIlO """'_IlI_IL_Y.IlI._Mg. """'_IlI_IL_~_b8g. OlllER W€LLS "~D IDRlI/G5 Otho< "./-I.1ed .nd ..,..... woII or borIrlg on ptOpInv? 0 VIe !:IN. How monVI LIC€N"D OR IlEGI&1WI!D CONTRACTOII C!llT1flCA TION ~. . TIlIe..-1 etlloMv woo _led In _nee willi __ Rulli, CIl_rom, TllIlnl_",," <ontollled In IIt",..pOn I. I~" Ih8 "'0' '" my...-go. KIMM~S-PAQ~R WELL DRILLING, INC. '19521 ~~N.",. ~OI~~.."""No. /~ -7- /A /" /J AUGUST 4TH. 2000 ~~I<t, ~. / -'''h ,r~~ Au"',"'''' FIfp_,1w SIgnoW" 0.,. DEAN SCHAUER AUGUST 4THo 2000 Nom. 0' "'''011 $Q1Ing 1'111/ or f1<H/~g VIII-C-2 Memorandum To: Honorable Mike Werner and City Council members From: William R. Mesaros Supervisor ofInspections and Code Enforcement Date: March 29,2001 Subject: Optional Adoptive Code provision Minnesota Rule Chapter 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems. Recommended Council Action The Operations committee ofthe Hastings City council is recommending the full city council take action approving the first reading of an ordinance repealing the optional adoptive code provision Minnesota rule Chapter 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems. Background In recent weeks city staff and members of the City Council have attended two meeting with citizens, business owners and officials from the Hastings Chamber of Commerce for the purpose of discussing building and general code issues in the City of Hastings. The issues of discussion were a result of a survey conducted by the Chamber of Commerce for business retention in the City of Hastings. One ofthe primary issues discussed was the more restrictive fire protection requirement. City ordinance No. 276 as adopted by City Council on December 13,1990 and effective December 20, 1990 has been the code standard for fire suppression throughout the city since its adoption. During the meetings, some ofthe major issues presented by those in attendance were available water supply, uniformity of application, retroactive installations, historic buildings, reduction oftota1 building size to avoid sprinkler installation and financial hardship. After hearing concerns relating to the ordinance, the Operations committee of the City Council with the support of the Hastings Chamber of Commerce is recommending the council approve the first reading as requested above and schedule a public hearing and a second reading for April 16, 2001. ORDINANCE NO. - SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE CITY CODE BY DELETING SECTION 4.01, SUBDIVISION 3(2) PERTAINING TO THE REQUIREMENT OF SPECIAL FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS AS FOLLOWS: Hastings City Code Chapter 4, Section 4.01, Subdivision 3(2) which adopted Chapter 1306, Special Fire Protection Systems with option 8a, of the Minnesota State Building Code is hereby deleted in its entirety. This ordinance shml take effect upon passage and seven days after publication. This ordinance was adopted by the Hastings City Council on this _ day of .2001. Michael D. Werner, Mayor ATTEST: (SEAL) Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk vm~C~3 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and City Councilm ~.4 Dave Osberg, City Administrator ~~ March 29, 2001 Establish Committee to Review Certain F' a Building Code Regulations RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION It is recommended that the City Council take action authorizing the establishment of a Committee to review certain Fire and Building Code Regulations, with members to be considered from the following groups: City Council Operations Committee: (Janette Yandrasits has offered to become a member from this Committee) City Council Planning Committee: (Lynn Moratzka-chair; Danna Elling Schultz, Turney Hazlet) Public Safety Committee: (Ed Riveness-chair; Paul Hicks, Turney Hazlet) Industrial Park Board Downtown Business Association Chamber of Commerce Historic Preservation Commission HRA Members of the Committee will officially be appointed by the City Council at later date, after proper solicitation of candidates is completed. BACKGROUND An earlier agenda item suggests that the City Council take action beginning the process of repealing Section 1306 of the Building Code, which currently requires the installation of sprinkler systems under certain circumstances. Background material on the item is included elsewhere in the Council Packet. At the most recent meeting of the Operations Committee, the Committee has recommended that the process for repeal of the Ordinance begin. While potential repeal of 1306 will eliminate some of the hardship relating to certain buildings downtown and other buildings that may need rehabilitation, there will continue to be Building and Fire Code issues that warrant discussion between the City and the business community. Thus, the recommendation that a Committee of business and government officials be established to address those issues in the next 12-18 month. The Committee would assist the City in understanding the impact of certain building and fire code issues on the business community. In addition, the business community would likely have a better understanding of certain life, safety issues that have an impact on their property. Once candidates for appointment are forwarded to me, I will then present the full Committee roster to the City Council for approval. INFORMATIONAL MEMO To: From: Subject: Date: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Tom Montgomery Rosemount and Empire Treatment Plant Expansions March 28,2001 On Wednesday, March 22nd, I attended a focus group meeting sponsored by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) on the RosemountlEmpire Treatment Plants Master Plan. MCES staff presented information on the need to expand the Empire Treatment Plant's capacity from 12 mgd to 24 mgd by 2050. The Empire Plant's current flow is 8.5 mgd and will reach its plant capacity of 12 mgd by 2005. The Empire Plant discharges its treated effluent to the Vermillion River. The existing plant flow makes up 15% to 20% of the flow in the Vermillion River. The Rosemount Treatment Plant's capacity of 0.84 mgd needs to be expanding to meet the projected 2005 demand of 4.5 mgd. The Rosemount Plant's current flow is 0.7 mgd, all of which is discharged into the Mississippi River. The MCES staff presented several options for expanding the two plants and then asked the focus group to vote on the alternatives. The focus group was predominantly made up of township officials and small town residents, all of whom were concerned about the Vermillion River. A proposed option for expanding the Empire Treatment Plant to 24 mgd and constructing an 18 mile effluent outfall to discharge into the Mississippi River south of Hastings was the overwhelming choice of the focus group participants. Under this option, the Rosemount Treatment Plant would be converted into a pumping station to pump wastewater into the lnver Grove Heights interceptor sewer which drains to the main metro treatment plant in St. Paul. The next steps in the master planning process involve finalizing cost estimates for the plant alternatives, updating the Metropolitan Council Environmental Committee on April lOt\ and holding public hearings and adopting a master plan for the treatment plant expansions. ~ Metropolitan Council ~ Environmental ServtCCJJ ~~ ~ Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update Focus Group Meetings March, 2001 . Agenda" ~ . Project Background . Key Issues . Project Status . Alternative Evaluation . Project Schedule ~ Metropolitan Counell ~ Environmental Serrn.CCJJ Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 312001 . page 1 Wastewater Treatment Needs .. Rosemount WWTP* Empire WWTP* . Discharges to the Mississippi River . Serves 75% of the city of Rosemount . Current flow: 0.70 mgd (million gallons per day) . Current capacity: 0.84 mgd . Capacity required by: . 2005: 1.25 mgd . 2020: 3.0 mgd . 2050: 4.5 mgd . Discharges to the Vennillion River . Serves the cities of Apple Valley, Lakeville, Fannington, Empire Township, and 25% of Rosemount . Current flow: 8.5 mgd . Current capacity: 12.0 mgd . Capacity required by: . 2005: 12mgd . 2020: 17mgd . 2050: 24 mgd WWTP . Wastewater Treatment Plant Planning Process .. Phase 1: Master Planning Phase 2: Facility Planning _ Major Decisions - Develop plan specifics - Treatment capacity -h..l fJ.;e..,.. from broad-based Master ~eeded 28.> ,..,tJ "" , Plan recommendations Where wastewater _ Specific wastewater treatment service will be treatment and residuals ....erovided process decisions - Where treated effluent _ Specific interceptor will be discharged alternatives _ Schedule: July 2000 to May 2001 . Schedule: May to September 2001 Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 312001 page 2 Key Issues .JI; . Customer Service (Schedule) . Vermillion River . Flooding . Trout Habitat . Streambarik Degradation . Stormwater Management . Dakota County and Scott County as the WMO . Role of the Metropolitan Council . Potential delay of wastewater project . Multiple Stakeholders , Status Repo'rt ...ll Watershed Initiatives . Working group has been established with service area communities . Workshop sponsored for communities and regulatory agencies in December . Specific actions . Cities to benchmark their stormwater management plans vs. MPCA model storm water ordinance . MCES proposing a Vermillion River runoff volume management study Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 312001 page 3 f fIOr t'jljl ~ cPr It;vt'' t -7' ~/i?1I Status Report ... Alternative Analysis . Service Area alternatives . Where is treatment plant capacity to be built? . Where is the treated effluent to be discharged? . Critical non-economic factors . Economic evaluation under refinement Alternative Evaluation Criteria ... . 5 Non-Economic Criteria Categories . Competitive Business Plan . Sustainability . Environmental . Operations and Maintenance . Adaptability Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 312001 page 4 WWTP Alternatives ~ . Rosemount Service Area -Build new 4.5 mgd WWTP (Alts. 1,2,6) -Transport and treat at Metro (Alts. 1,2,5M) -Transport and treat at Empire (Alts. 4,5) WWTP Alternatives. ~ . Change Empire Service - Maintain 12 mgd capacity at Empire and divert 12 mgd to Seneca WWTP (All 6) - Divert to Rosemount WWTP . Maintain 12 mgd capacity at Empire and divert 12 mgd to Rosemount WWlP (16.5 mgd capacity at Rosemount) (Alt. 3) .Abandon Empire plant and build 28.5 mgd plant at Rosemount (Alt. 7) Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 312001 page 5 WWTP Alternatives J . Maintain existing Empire Service Area . Expand WWTP to 24 mgd and consider alternative discharge options . Vermillion River (All. 1) . Mississippi River - Pool 2 (Alt. 2) . Mississippi River - South of Hastings (Alt. 5M) WWTP Alternatives J ~oo~ e r!,..-,;,-J...- . "Drivers" for Wastewater Treatment .Single Plant Operation .Build large plant to minimize impacts of industrial waste and septage .Optimize use of existing infrastructure .Large site adaptable to meet changing growth patterns and regulatory requirements .Minimize length of raw sewage forcemains and raw sewage pumping capacity Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 312001 page 6 RosemouIllfEmpire Master Plan & Facility Plan A1tomlllive No.1 - Malfofied Sfpl1f'l.tt SetVi~ Arel18' Legend . IntWC-,R.. ..""V:E:nse_i~ NF,rGpQ'*i . r"'< ( ~ ~ I ".viPropo... OuIJaI ( ~ ~~.' ~4i.~ l.~~~--_.._..__.-:--._.r-.-~;i:; '.....) j j_H...mg-_ . ':.. .^ -~l ~.r.~I\\!I. ~:..+ ! =.::~~ ". ~f'utq..D"'lIlcIpment I / "Heotings,( ..i'''.' :'-'-~ ""L_~ ....~~?;f; : :"". :~. : '" _fit'll;:;..... ~ <\'f.: i J '-i .__........J c] ;, "" I ,oj j Alternative No. 1 ~ Benefits/Advantages . Opportunities for partnerships · Defer capital expenditures for outfall and direct money to river improvements Roadblocks/Disadvantages · Opposition to increased flow to Vermillion River Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 312001 page 7 RosemouutfEmpire Master Plan & Facility Plan Alternative No.2 SlIpal'lt. SG'\ioe Arell! Legend Int.rupto.. /"VExill:ing /'./Prl)posed .~ .----.--~_..i---~k~=d Cum' 1':U~ '1 ! nliIDl HlMlingl "\ I : ;,..... . . ~.. C.:':HfII'. 01';';'. ~= ROIemounl ~ s-n_ ~Futu,. DweklpmeRt snngs( 1~ ....~.:..;'.~ I h~:~ri:'l "...h." "" i '''' -<i ! i , 1 _....1-...m...........I rh'::i \ Alternative No. 2 .Jl Benefits/Advantages . Flow to Vermillion River capped at 12 mgd . Some flow to Vermillion River may be beneficial Roadblocks/Disadvantages . Public perception . Energy requirements to pump effluent - Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 3f2001 page 8 RosemountfEmpire Mastel" Plan & Facility Plan Altem.ave No, ~ - Modified Legend ""'U.l;"~ !'...,.. D tl [''''-J i Alternative No. 5 - Modified ... Benefits/Advantages . Ends flow to Vermillion River Roadblocks/Disadvantages . New discharge location required - interstate waters . Public perception Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 312001 page 9 Summary ... Treatment Plant Alternatives Expand Empire WWTP to 24 MGD . Outfall Ootions - Mississippi River - Pool 2 - Mississippi River - below Hastings - Vermillion River Rosemount WWTP phase out Strategy ... . Make treatment plant location decision . Service areas remain as they are . Rosemount to be treated at Metro WWTP . Expand Empire capacity to 24 mgd . Continue to evaluate discharge location options . Opportunities for greenways and environmental enhancement . Opportunities for partnerships to optimize public investment Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 312001 " page 10 Schedule - Master Plan ;0 · Environment Committee Briefing - February 27 . Public Focus Groups - March 16-28 · Dakota County Board Presentation - April 10 · Environment Committee Briefing - April 1 0 . Public Meeting - May/June 1+'1 Metropolitan Council AA BnWt'onnwntal S......u... Schedule ..... May 2001: Complete Phase I: Master Plan September 2001: Council adopts Facility Plan October 2001: Initiate Design September 2002: Complete Design January 2003: Initiate Construction June 2004: Complete Construction December 2004: Complete Start-up Empire/Rosemount Master Planning Update: Focus Groups 312001 page 11 RosemOlUlVEmpn:e Master Plan & Facility Plan Alternative No.1 Separate S""ice Arels Legend Alternative No. 1 ... Benefits/Advantages . Minimal siting considerations . Opportunities for partnerships . Optimizes use of existing infrastructure Roadblocks/Disadvantages . Opposition to increased flow Vermillion River . Difficult to stay on schedule . Two treatment plant operation or long forcemains RosemOlUltfEmpire Master Plan & Facility Plan ,lllt..,eIive No.2 Legend s.para~ ~<<\'iC<l Areas ~.r'Jh.J'o T",~ ,,"t-><\\I::E~"" r.... (] )] I ~. Alternative No. 2 .. Benefits/Advantages · Flow to Vermillion River capped at 12 mgd . Minimal siting considerations . Preserves existing outfalls . Optimizes use of existing infrastructure Roadblocks/Disadvantages · Public perception regarding expansion of Empire WWTP · Two treatment plant operation or long forcemains ROSelllOlmtfEmpire Master Plan & Facility Plan AltcllIalit'e No, 3 Combiue sen,ice Are.. . Two Plant _.IJ t.m.1i ,'e Legend t .;; .. " / 'i 16,5 MGb Captcly "'1 Diama,.;. 10 b~ ~.~";Exisiig~'iir'''''''''r''; :~::::~...t l"'~.t""'I!'. Tv.." ,,'d';;/ !!:.Sfl:4 't"M:'; ,..-1..,/ I I j'l. I .r.......... j ,..- I .....:d. I M+''th.r, T'hl). Empire vvViff5'....;: "....fo\....t.... I 12 MGO Capai:i!y . . Oisch.rge to i I ...."."">mII1iml'Riv~".:,'r-. CJ D [""J Alternative No. 3 --* Benefits/Advantages . Flow to Vermillion River capped at 12 mgd . Minimal siting considerations . Preserves existing outfalls Roadblocks/Disadvantages . Two treatment plant operation . Greater impact of industrial waste and septage on smaller plants RosemouutlEmpire Mastel' Plml & Facility Plan AIlelllalive No.4 Olmmne Sen'i<:e.Areas . One Plant Allernath-e Legend t:CJl1_,c- Oro\l~ 'f R ,": ~..dan ~"-""''''''''''''''''''''" ,- ~1$:lHl'!:n t..,. . ; 16.5 MGD Du',. ppj ; 10 Ros""'....tQIOfllIl I7i .. ..~. .~. ...f__l . ,'" .~...' ~...... .....r. ~...' :.v....y.ocfSl:.... "'.:."'.n 1"YI\II>. CJ ~ r"] 1 Alternative No. 4 ... Benefits/Advantages . Flow to Vermillion River capped at 12 mgd . Preserves existing outfalls . Greater flow capacity minimizes impact of industrial waste and septage . Single Plant operation Roadblocks/Disadvantages . Public perception regarding expansion of the Empire WWTP ROllemOlD.ltfEmpire Master Plan & Facility Pl"Ul Altemative NO.5 (Uulall~ Seni~ Ar~as - On~ Plant Alto-native Legend 1I".lciIP'Ctra /'v' Existing ~ PrDpond rV Propolld 0uIfa1 WWTP ::::'::,'Empi.. llllm HOItingl illilill, Ro.I...... _ Son... ~ Fu.,.. D...lopmlnl astings "'(I'ol-:l:~;.-: .. 26.5 0 Outfall . ...r:''']' ~.~~~. ~~.~:i R;.r.f ':. . :"..' L...,./ Sout of Hastings .... i;~..../ EmpreWNT~ ; ;I.u.:;*:': !'"~. h...;!!l,~..!!!g,Q,~,~~~~.r... I Iii ~ i""'"]j Alternative No. 5 . ... Benefits/Advantages . . Ends flow to Vermillion River . Greater flow capacity minimizes impact of industrial waste and septage . Single Plant operation Roadblocks/Disadvantages . New discharge location required - interstate waters . Public perception regarding expansion of the Empire WWTP RosemOlUlt/Empil'e Ivloster P10n & Facility Plan A1lefilllti,,'e No.6 Scpml~ Senice..ue.. SeneCll Dh-e,'lIon ,tJterualin Legend ',' 'l ....~,.... /V exi8ling ";1 I' ( ' ' ! t /'..I Prop_ S $),' l~ . !..-..-.-......---..--...... ......-.......A' Prop_ 0uIr.1 <c . '"5,: '\..,1 WNI'P . ;::ac~1 i . .. - ""1 ( 1 Rl- h)~:; O~ ;< ~"l' c.cUag. ~r.". i :::::::: Empire .:MJ\ta '; f ~ _ SIlnecl " j illlllll Holfillgl ! ~ FUtlN o..llopmo.1 "=r:( "...:;.~~ :. I ...\; .'~ ~.~ ! .....".,., I, 1'"""" .~. :,..... "".f"",h.a ":'wr. 1 ! .....i-...........J r'''~:.1 ~ ,......., L...J ~1 Alternative No. 6 ... ,Benefits/Advantages . Flow to Vennillion River capped, at 12 mgd . Preserves existing outfalls . Delays capital expenditures to expand WWTPs Roadblocks/Disadvantages . Opposition of current Seneca service area customers . Questionable ease of Seneca WWTP expansion . May impede long -tenn growth in SW metro area - Uses Minnesota river capacity . Long forcemain will exacerbate odor problems in plant area RoselllOlmt/Empire Master Plan & Facility Plan Altcmati\'e No. : ('anlllne Set\'ice Areas. Olle P1allt Alternative Legend Cc,'1f1..* Gf"''''' In..Joe........ /'v' Existing A/ Proposed r""'../ Proposed Outfal WWlP ;,,;; [mpill @~M Huling. ~~mm: Roc.mounl _ Son.co I ~ FUlJrI Oenlopmenl ---'Hastings (. '.WWTP . Ji. ~rr ~.r~~':1:'l l~. Vl:f.,!i,:!;:';J~ l'WP. Cl I r"mJ j Alternative No. 7 .. Benefits/Advantages . Ends flow to Vermillion River . Greater flow capacity minimizes impact of industrial waste and septage . Single Plant operation . Preserves Rosemount outfall Roadblocks/Disadvantages . Abandons 12 mgd existing infrastructure . Increases discharge to Pool 2 . Long high capacity raw sewage forcemain . Construction phasing difficulties en CI) > .- .. ca c .. CI) .. - C A- I- ....- s::: CI) E ....- m CI) .... I- .... CI) ....- cu 3: S CI) .- ....- +' fn f! cu (1) 3: ~ .... +' ~ ; - a.. (1) - C') s: .- t/) . '"' '"' ~ CI) > "- .... C ... ... . 'I- o J!l o eu Q. E .- (1) (1) .!::! C') EJ! .- Q. .E (1) E U) o"'C +' s: +' eu c (1) eu+' _ U) Q.eu CP ~ C')- ... eu eu .- - ... +' "'CU) == ::::J ~"'C m .E . J: l o ... C') (1) C') :; .5 J!J +' C') C g C (1) ... eu E ~ J: (1) U) 0'" eu .- .:- G) ~ c c- ._ (1) (1) E ... o~ +' 0 (1)+' :co!! eu ~ +'tn e..(1) eu ... "'C"'C eu c (1) eu +' .- U) o c (1) ... e'! eu eu ...JQ. . tn C .- +' U) .- >< (1) "I- o CP U) ~ CP N I- E I- +' e.. o . "'C C eu U) c l- eu E (1) o ... .E (1) tn~ eu .- ~ 0 (1) eu U) ~ ~ 0 eu tn ... C 'I- .- Oe.. .cE +' ~ tne.. C (1) ..!tn CP eu N ~. 1- (1) .5 U) .E ~ :iEf! . RoselllOlmtiEmpire Master PlcUl & Facility Plan Alternative No. 1 - Modified Le9l!nd Int...ceptOnl: rv:~~n~ ~:~o.poUd. jf ': I"' t 'X i t ^' Prop.nil O"U..I """/11 s}., )f"':. r...--...........-........;.-....... ........"'SwV:uA..... ~ ~.~ Empn l.>'lft'. : hrx 1 i fmlllli Hastings '~ ~ 'l'7'O\!, ( l. mm~:, Ronmouri ('~~t~,~ 'O~.'..f '! ! .SO..... 1.. I ro2.7'" D...I.....~t ....Hesting~'1'~,,' . ROsen1lunl ., .~ /1 Tr......pcit ~d Trut ':, .- /.- ..if l et Melr~ . ....L..:..;... '~~l'J ':~~..m..........f?~:.:::...::::~..~:=....m...T.': ' ! ~.'1 i i la~:~~M~_~:1 en~r~.~l........... i[L.. I ~"'...,.~ : '~'<'1 m~::;!~~ ~r I .......L..._.........J I C::J 1.1 I r"':'.'}j Sepal'"t. s..:l'ieo= An,as Alternative No. 1 ... Benefits/Advantages . Opportunities for partnerships . Defer capital expenditures for outfall and direct money to river improvements Roadblocks/Disadvantages . Opposition to increased flow to Vermillion River ROllemOlUlt!Empire Master Plan & Facility Plan A1temetive No.2 SclplU'lte Sen"ice Areas Legend :r.t.r~:':"A 'l'~ t- ,.">...... L..i ~l ,': Alternative No. 2 -'* Benefits/Advantages . Flow to Vermillion River capped at 12 mgd . Some flow to Vermillion River may be beneficial Roadblocks/Disadvantages . Public perception . Energy requirements to pump effluent ROSemOl.nlt/Empire Master PlcUl & Facility Plan Alternative No. :5 - Modified Legend ..."IC..'.... /'V Existing I A./ Proposed l ~ Proposed Outfat I ~ F..,.. O...lopmonl ".,''.' Gt... I = Empi.. I ~mm~~ Hidings 'I 3~~~~~~ Ros.mount , _ Son... _JHastings{ WWTP . ~'.,"~ ! A ..",., ..........1. ' ,., .' ";::>',/1 ;'t ...c~"4:tlj;.ol :" . 2.4 DOu!lall / ~ f':.lf40l:'<\'":~'.~.. ......LJ/;~..:;::~:..'./ !"., ''*r <., ~.f:l\.:''':1 !'...,.. " D ["....] ~ Alternative No. 5 - Modified .. Benefits/Advantages . Ends flow to Vermillion River Roadblocks/Disadvantages . New discharge location required - interstate waters . Public perception INFORMATIONAL MEMO To: From: Subject: Date: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Tom Montgomery Street Maintenance Operations March 28,2001 POTHOLES The large amount of snow this winter and spring temperatures hovering around the freezing point have created a bumper crop of potholes this year. Street Department crews have been patching potholes for the past three weeks and have used close to 40 tons of patching mixture so far. A normal spring pothole repair would use 10 to 15 tons of patching mixture. We are down to our last 8 tons of patching mixture and are eagerly awaiting warmer temperatures and the opening ofthe hot mix bituminous plants. As with salt supplies this past winter, the patching mixture suppliers have run out of product. The patching mix is a combination of oil and gravel that is produced by a select number of hot mix plants before they close operations in late fall. The high oil content in the mix allows it to be placed cold and be less susceptible to deterioration from moisture in the pothole. The high demand for patching mix resulted in our Street Department crews driving to Rochester to purchase most of our mix as the metro area plants have used up their supplies. The Rochester supplier is now also out of product. Earlier this spring, Street Department crews were busy opening storm drains and channeling the snow melt runoffto the storm drains. We want to direct the runoffto the gutter as much as possible to keep water out of cracks and opening in the street. Water in street cracks and openings weakens the road base and freezes and expands, creating potholes. The City of Saint Paul Public Works Department operates its own hot mix plant which has already started production this spring. The Street Department will check with Saint Paul to determine if we can purchase some hot mix product for repair of potholes. However, the weather has to warm up above 40 degrees to make use of hot mix, given the hauling distance and rapid cooling of the mix. STREET SWEEPING Street sweeping operations will commence when the snow has melted from curbs and first few feet of the boulevards. Street sweeping operations will begin on the stronger, high volume streets. Sweeping on the weaker residential street will begin once the supporting base beneath the pavement surface has dried out and firmed up enough to support the sweepers. Our two street sweepers can carry up to 2 tons of water, which combined with the vehicle weight and street sweepings load, can easily damage the residential streets if the street base is still soft. The initial round of sweeping involves the use of the two street sweepers, three dump trucks for hauling sweepings, and a flusher truck for wetting down the street and sand for easier pick up. The initial round of sweeping takes two to three weeks to complete. A second round of sweeping is then made for cleanup of areas where the sand load was too heavy to get fully cleaned on the first round. The second round of sweeping takes one to two weeks to complete. In residential areas, Street Department crews will post cardboard no parking signs a day or two in advance of sweeping operations to alert homeowners to remove the cars from the street. FLOOD OPERATIONS If a flooding situation occurs this year, pothole patching and street sweeping operations will be delayed. During past floods, the Street Department crews have been fully committed in hauling sand and sandbags, coordinating and directing volunteers, closing streets and storm drains, monitoring flooding, and cleaning up after flooding.