HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-07-00 CITY OF HASTINGS
Monday
COUNCIL MEETING 7:00 P.M. DATE: August 07, 2000
1. CALL TO ORDER:
II. ROLL CALL:
III. DETERMINATION OF QUORUM:
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Approval of Minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 24, 2000
V. COUNCIL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED:
VI. CONSENT AGENDA:
The items on the Consent Agenda are to be acted upon by the City Council in a
single motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a
Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the items will be removed
from the Consent Agenda to the appropriate department for discussion.
1. Pay All Bills As Audited
2. Authorize Advertisement for Bids—Outdoor Hockey Rink Civic Arena
3. Resolution—Appointing Election Judges for 2000 Primary Election
4. Resolution—Setting 2000 Election Judge Salaries
5. Set Special Council Meeting for Thursday, September 14, 2000 to Canvass
2000 Primary Election Results
6. Approve Liquor License for Oliver's Grove Pizza & Pasta, 1223 Vermillion
Street
7. Repair of Street Lights in Industrial Park
8. Amendment to Miller Electric Development Agreement
VII. AWARDING OF CONTRACTS & PUBLIC HEARING:
VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY STAFF:
A. Public Works
1. Planning Committee Recommendation—General Sieben Drive
Extension
B. City Planner
1. Minor Subdivision -295 Crestview Drive
2. EAW Record of Decision - Barton Sand and Gravel
3. 1st Reading/Order Public Hearing - Guardian Angels Block Rezone
4. Site Plan - Guardian Angels Block Redevelopment
C. Administrator
IX. COMMENTS FROM AUDIENCE:
X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
XI. NEW BUSINESS:
XII. REPORTS FROM CITY COMMITTEES, OFFICERS, COUNCILMEMBERS:
XIII. ADJOURNMENT:
Next Regular City Council Meeting on Monday, August 21, 2000
Hastings,Minnesota
July 24,2000
The City Council of the City of Hastings, Minnesota met in a regular meeting on
Monday, July 24, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 101 4 h Street
East,Hastings, Minnesota.
Members Present: Councilmember Riveness, Simacek, Johnson, Hicks,Moratzka,
Yandrasits&Mayor Werner
Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: David Osberg, City Administrator,
Shawn Moynihan, City Attorney;
Matt Weiland, City Planner;
Lo.~;Webster, Finance Director;
Mark Holmes, Fire Chief,
Stephanie Nornes, MIS Director;
Charlene Stark, Assistant Finance Director;
Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk
Approval of Minutes
Mayor Werner asked if there were any corrections or additions to the minutes of
the regular meeting of July 10, 2000 and hearing none approved the minutes as presented.
7 Ayes;Nays,None
Approval of Consent Agenda
Moved by Councilmember Riveness, seconded by Councilmember Johnson to
approve the Consent Agenda as presented.
7 Ayes;Nays;None
1. Pay All Bills As Audited
2. Item was removed from Agenda
3. Resolution-Application for Premise Permit for Lawful Gambling for the
Minnesota Jaycees Charitable Foundation at Eagles Aerie#2212, 1220 Vermillion
Street
4. Request for Payment, RKI-2000 Street&Utility Improvements: $407,534.68
5. Resolution—Waiving the 30 Day Waiting Period for Hastings Fire Department
Relief Association
6. Approve Changes in Joint Powers Agreement
7. Resolution—Mail Balloting for Washington County Registered Voters in
Hastings
Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of July 24,2000 Page 2 of 5
Resolution#7-10-00 Set 2000 No Obligation Improvement Bond
Bob Thistle, Senior Vice-President of Springsted was available at the meeting to
present recommendations for the issuance of$3,380,000.00 General Obligation
Improvement Bonds.
Moved by Councilmember Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Yandrasits, to
approve Resolution 7-10-00 providing for the sale of$3,380,000.00 in General obligation
Improvement Bonds.
7 Ayes;Nays,None.
Wide Area Network Needs Study
MIS Coordinator Stephanie Nomes requested Council approval for a proposal for
an Integrated Voice and Data Wide Area Network Analysis at a cost of$4.600.00.
Moved by Councilmember Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Riveness to
approve the appropriation of$4,600.00 for a Wide Area Network Needs Study.
7 Ayes;Nays,None.
Minor Subdivision Variance 295 Crestview Drive
City Planner Matt Weiland stated that the City has received an application for a
minor subdivision in order to subdivide an existing lot into two separate lots. This
request is being made because when the house was built in 1987, it was mislocated on the
lot. The applicant is requesting approval of a 1.12 foot variance to the required 50 foot
lot width minimum at the building setback line. The applicant is proposing to construct a
single family home on the lot.
Weiland also stated that the Planning Commission reviewed this item at the July
17, 2000 meeting and the Commission at that time voted unanimously to deny the lot
width variance as they did not feel it met the variance criteria.
The applicant, Arthur Krueger of 1603 Forest Street was present and stated that
he was making this request for a development project that is consistent with the rest of
the neighborhood.
Paul Hendriksen, 290 Crestview Drive stated that if the original house would have
been located correctly in the first place, this request wouldn't be before the Council,
because two homes would not normally sit on this size lot.
City Planner Matt Weiland stated that if the request for a 1.12 foot variance is
denied, the applicant could still build a duplex on this lot which is consistent with the
zoning of the property. The applicant would only need a building permit for the
construction of a duplex.
Council had discussion over reconfiguring the location of the proposed house,the
appropriateness of a single family versus a multi-family structure on that lot, and the
precedent that could be set with this issue.
Moved by Councilmember Simacek, seconded by Councilmember Riveness to
table this issue
7 Ayes;Nays,None
Minutes of the Reeular City Council Meetine of July 24.2000 Paee 3 of 5
Moved by Councilmember Simacek, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to
extend the timetable an additional 60 days for consideration of this request.
7 Ayes;Nays, None
Site Plan House Move 517 East 7th Street
Moved by Councilmember Johnson, seconded by Councilmember Yandrasits to
approve the site plan and house move from 517 East 7m Street, with the additional
condition that the applicant try to preserve as many of the mature trees on the site as
possible.
7 Ayes;Nays,None
Preliminary Plat Site Plan Hastings Market Place West
Cowlcit was presented with a preliminary plat and site plan for this project and
discussed reevaluating the parking lot configuration to accommodate the volume of
traffic in this development. That item was added as a condition.
Moved by Councilmember Simacek, seconded by Councilmember Hicks to
approve the preliminary plat for Hastings Marketplace West.
7 Ayes,Nays,None
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Riveness to
approve the preliminary site plan for Hastings Marketplace West.
7 Ayes,Nays,None
Site Plan Miller Electric for the Industrial Park
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Simacek to
approve the site plan for Miller Electric, with the condition added that no Certificate of
Occupancy be issued until all the conditions associated with the building have been met.
7 Ayes, Nays,None
Presentation and Acceptance of 1999 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and
Audit Management Letter
Joe Rigdon, the Audit Manager from Kern, DeWenter, Viere was present to
review the report and related audit comments with the Council. Rigdon stated that the
City had received an unqualified opinion, which is the most desirable opinion to receive.
Moved by Councilmember Simacek, seconded by Councilmember Hicks to
accept the 1999 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and Audit Management Letter.
7 Ayes, Nays,None
Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of July 24,2000 Page 4 of 5
Residential Solid Waste Collection RFP
City Administrator David Osberg stated that Council requested to approve a
residential solid waste collection request for proposal and authorize the distribution of the
RFP with a deadline for submittal for September 1, 2000. Osberg also asked for Council
clarification on three items prior to RFP being approved and distributed.
1. Whether the RFP will require that the successful hauler provides double
collection during the week in which solid waste items are not collected on a holiday.
Moved by Councilmember Riveness, seconded by Councilmember Simacek to
add that the language to double collection be submitted in the proposal.
7 Ayes,Nays,None
Moved by Councilmember Yandrasits, seconded by Councilmember Simacek to
reconsider the language of double collection to be included in the RFP.
7 Ayes,Nays,None
Moved by Councilmember Yandrasits, seconded by Councilmember Simacek that
the language regarding double collection be stated in the RFP that proposals are
encouraged but not required to submit cost for double collection, but are not required to
submit cost for double collection, for the contract.
7 Ayes,Nays,None
2. Whether the Council desires the requirement for a one pass system which would
allow for the collection of garbage and recycling materials in one truck.
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Riveness to
include language in the RFP that states applicants are encouraged but not required to
submit information about the opportunity for the one pass system.
7 Ayes,Nays, None
3. Whether the RFP should include a requirment that the recycling containers
provided by the collector have a hinged top.
Moved by Councilmember Riveness, seconded by Councilmember Simacek to
remove that item from consideration or inclusion in the RFP.
7 Ayes;Nays,None
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to
include language in the RFP that allows for future discussion of the possibility of using
the option of processed waste during the life of this contract.
7 Ayes;Nays,None
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Riveness to
approve the RFP with the changes as approved by the Council.
7 Ayes;Nays,None
Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of July 24,2000 Page 5 of 5
The Assistant Fire Chief Position
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Johnson to authorize the
posting and advertising for the position of Assistant Fire Chief as a closed promotional
process, approving the job description for the Assistant Fire Chief, and authorize staff to
utilize Personnel Decision Inc. to assist with the testing process for Assistant Fire Chief
Candidates.
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Johnson to begin
the process of hiring an Assistant Fire Chief.
7 Ayes;Nays, None
Mayor Werner noted that effective August 1, 2000 the Vermillion River Watershed
Management Organization will go under the authority of Dakota County, as the members
of the Vermillion River Watershed Management Organization were unable to agree on
the Joint Powers Agreement.
Adjournment
Moved by Councilmember Simacek, seconded by Councilmember Riveness to
adjourn at 9:07 p.m.
7 Ayes,Nays, None
ATTEST
Mayor City Clerk
1
VI - 1
Date: 08/03/2000 Time: 13:42:38 Operator: LYNNE BENSON
Page: 1
City of Hastings
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
CITIES TWO REFUND 80= OF PERMIT FEE 40.40
HASTINGS AREA CHAMSE LODGING TAX - JUNE 6,853.56
MN STATE TREASURER QUARTERLY SURCHARGE END 5,032.99
MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 662.15
REGINA MEDICAL CENTS WELLNESS - JULY 598.00
REGINA MEDICAL CENTS WELLNESS - JULY OVERPAYM -280.00
Total for Department 12,907.10*
COUNCIL MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 50.63
COUNCIL SPRINGSTED PUBLIC FI GOLF COURSE STUDY 11/24/ 8,141.55
Total for Department 6011 8,192.18*
ADMINISTRATION CORPORATE EXPRESS ADD MACHINE TAPE 8.77
ADMINISTRATION CORPORATE EXPRESS BINDERS 55.31
w11111q_eTrf.T1OP CORPORATE EXPRESS STAPLER 34.91 - •.
r. IISTRATION CORPORATE EXPRESS TAPE, POSTAGE METER 24.40
ADMINISTRATION CORPORATE EXPRESS TRAY/INDEXES/FILES/PENS/ 72.11
ADMINISTRATION FARMER BROS CO. COFFEE 23.92
ADMINISTRATION FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 59.84
ADMINISTRATION IKON OFFICE SOLUTION CH COPIER 7/12-8/12/00 410.14
ADMINISTRATION IKON OFFICE SOLUTION FAX MAINTENANCE 171.43
ADMINISTRATION MN CITY/CTNY MANGEMN MCMA MEMBERSHIP-OSBERG 86.86
ADMINISTRATION MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 18.75
ADMINISTRATION SPRINT JULY PHONE 1,082.21
Total for Department 6020 2,048.65+
CITY CLERK FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 17.85 .
CITY CLERK HASTINGS STAR GAZETT PROPOSAL-WASTE HAULER 20.70
CITY CLERK HASTINGS STAR GAZETT SP USE PERMIT-PARK PLACE 20.70
CITY CLERK MN CITY/CTNY MANGEMN ANNUAL MCMA MEMBERSHIP 77.00
CITY CLERK MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 4.95
Total for Department 6040 141.20-
1 .'IONS MESKO, MELANIE ELECTION MILEAGE 27.30
Total for Department 6041 27.30*
FINANCE FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 74.66
FINANCE MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 30.00
FINANCE WELLS FARGO BROKERAG JUNE SAFEKEEPING FEES 43.25
Total for Department 6050 147.91*
CITY FACILITIES DRUMMOND AMERICAN CO COLD FOGGER TRI JET 190.50
CITY FACILITIES FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 13.37
CITY FACILITIES GLEWWE DOORS, INC. CITY HALL KEYS 22.00
CITY FACILITIES GORDY'S GLASS HEAT TEMPERED GLASS 41.92
CITY FACILITIES GRAINGER, W.W. INC. BALLASTS 49.97
CITY FACILITIES GRAINGER, W.W. INC. LATEX GLOVES 16.40
CITY FACILITIES MID CON SYSTEMS INC WOOD RESTORER 60.57
CITY FACILITIES MINNEGASCO,ACCT'S PA JULY GAS 126.93
CITY FACILITIES MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 7.50
CITY FACILITIES NORTHERN STATES POWE JULY ELECTRIC 1,253.06
Date: 08/03/2000 Time: 13:42:39 Operator: LYNNE BENSON '
Page: 2
City of Hastings
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- ------------------- ------------------------ -----------
CITY FACILITIES ORKIN PEST CONTROL JULY SERVICE 82.05
CITY FACILITIES SCHILLING PAPER CO. CAN LINERS 53.09
CITY FACILITIES T.D.'S CLEANING JULY JANITORIAL SVC-POLI 1,118.25
CITY FACILITIES TOWER CLEANING SYSTE CITY HALL JANITORIAL JUL 1,150.20
Total for Department 6080 4,185.81*
CITY FACILITIES LIGH DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSN JULY ELECTRIC 17.70
CITY FACILITIES LIGH MINNEGASCO,ACCT'S PA JULY GAS 47.42
Total for Department 6081 65.12*
PLANNING FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 33.68
PLANNING MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 17.25
Total for Department 6090 50.93*
POLICE ANDERSON GORDON C FIREARM TARGETS 123.54
POLICE BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES RIVERTOWN DAYS SUPPLIES 169.32
POLICE BOISE CASCADE OFFICE INK CARTRIDGE/STAPLES 191.47
POLICE BOISE CASCADE OFFICE PAPER/BINDERS/TAPE' 165.48
POLICE COLOR LAB INC.(PHOTO DEVELOPING 18.06
POLICE DAKOTA CNTY TREAS-AU DAKOTA CO FUEL CHGS MAY- 3,160.94
POLICE EMERGENCY VEHICLE SU REPAIR SIREN & SQUAD EQU 51.83
POLICE EVANS, LARRY MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 8.78
POLICE FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 377,72
POLICE GALLS, INC. SHIRT-WUOLLET 41.99
POLICE GALLS, INC. TROUSERS-WUOLLET 85.98
POLICE HOESCHEN, JAMES B. BOOTS-SCHARFE/PUCH/NOWLA 293.50
POLICE LASERSHARP, INC. INK CARTRIDGE 85.20
POLICE MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 270.00
POLICE NAT'L CAMERA EXCHANG DIGITAL CAMERA EQUIP/VID 2,027.59
POLICE NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONE SERVICE 720.54
POLICE RGNONTI, JAMES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 210.00
POLICE SPRINT JULY PHONE 1,664.82
POLICE TECH PARTNERS ARCSERVET 486.75
POLICE TECH PARTNERS HP STORAGE SYSTEM 2,838.90
POLICE TECH PARTNERS ON SITE SERVICE 297.00
POLICE TECH PARTNERS TRADE PEMTIUM COMPUTER -607.05
POLICE UNIFORMS UNLIMITED CAUTION/POLCE LINE TAPE 190.90
POLICE U.S. INTERNET AUGUST MONTHLY FEE 59.95
POLICE U.S. INTERNET JULY MONTHLY FEE 59.95
POLICE WAL MART STORE #01-1 BATTERIES 8.35
POLICE WAL MART STORE #01-1 BUG SPRAY 25.37
POLICE WAL MART STORE #01-1 COFFEE 46.34
POLICE WAL MART STORE #01-1 FILM/BATTERIES 42.34
Total for Department 6210 13,115.56*
CRIME WATCH/PREVENTI HASTINGS BUS CO CROSSING GUARD PICNIC TR 121.44
Total for Department 6215 121.44*
BUILDING BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES TIRES/OIL CHANGE/AC RECH 418.39
BUILDING DAKOTA CNTY TREAS-AU DAKOTA CO FUEL CHGS MAY- 178.51
Date: 08/03/2000 Time: 13:42:39 Operator: LYNNE BENSON
Page: 3
City of Hastings
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
BUILDING FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 69.43
BUILDING HOESCHEN, JAMES B. BOOT RUBBERS-WILBUR 29.95
BUILDING MESAROS, WILLIAM MTG REIMBURSE-MESAROS 117.43
BUILDING MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 31.50
BUILDING NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONE SVC 120.59
Total for Department 6240 965.80*
HOUSING INSPECTION BLACK BEAR SYSTEMS, PTWIN32 UPGRADE 485.00
HOUSING INSPECTION EMERGENCY VEHICLE SU INSTALL RADIO/ANTENNA 91.44
Total for Department 6245 576.44*
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT ASSN OF MN EMERGENCY AMEN FAL CONF REG 80.00
Total for Department 6255 80.00*
A. AL CONTROL SHAMROCK ANIMAL CLIN ANIMAL CONTROL/BOARDING 899.16
Total for Department 6270 899.16*
ENGINEERING BOLTON & MENK INC GSD EXTENSION STUDY 1,827.21
ENGINEERING DAKOTA CNTy TREAS-AU DAKOTA CO FUEL CHGS MAY- 398.33
ENGINEERING FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 60.50
ENGINEERING MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 30.50
ENGINEERING MONTGOMERY, THOMAS AIRFARE-MONTGOMERY 140.00
Total for Department 6311 2,456.54*
STREETS ANDERSEN, E.F. & ASS STREET SIGNS 217.05
STREETS BAHLS SERVICE COUPLER 12.14
STREETS BAHLS SERVICE REPAIR TIRE 65.71
STREETS CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO SILA SAND 54.53
STREETS COMMERCIAL ASPHALT C BLACKTOP 1,532.55
STREETS DAKOTA CNTY TREAS-AU DAKOTA CO FUEL CHGS MAY- 2,789.32
STREETS ENVIRONMENTAL EQUIPM SWEEPER BROOM 319.50
ST-ETS FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 113.21
6 :TS G & K SERVICES MATS & TOWELS 81.26
STREETS MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT, STROBE LIGHT SWITCH 53.15
STREETS MEIER,TERRY SAFETY BOOTS-MEIER 150.00
STREETS MINNEGASCO,ACCT'S PA JULY GAS 39.27
STREETS MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 52.50
STREETS NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONES 440.15
STREETS PINE BEND PAVING, IN BLACKTOP 596.31
STREETS PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SUPPLIES 142.27
STREETS SHERWIN-WILLIAMS FILTER 10.54
STREETS SHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT 1 165.98
STREETS SHERWIN-WILLIAMS TRIM 8.67
STREETS SPRINT JULY PHONE 277.06
STREETS SWANSON PLBG. & HEAT SHEET METAL 66.70
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE .83
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE BARACADE TAPE 6.17
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE BINDER LOAD 18.09
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE CHALKLINE/POWDER 10.49
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE DRILL 248.25
Date: 08/03/2000 Time: 13:42:40 Operator: LYNNE BENSON '
Page: 4
City of Hastings
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE HACK SAW/GLASS 5.95
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE PAINT BRUSHES/GLOVES 13.39
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE PWR CORD/FASTENERS 9,02
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE ROLLER TRAY 3.08
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE RULE TAPE/BRUSH/KEY 19.21
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE SPRAYER 33.63
STREETS TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 12.79
STREETS UNLIMITED SUPPLY INC ADAPTOR 20.66
STREETS WAL MART STORE #01-1 PAINT ROLLER/TRASH BAGS 16.31
Total for Department 6312 7,605.74*
STREET LIGHTING CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO 12 BATS CILA SAND 81.79
; STREETLIGHTING GRAYBAR ELECTRIC FUSE HOLDERS/WIRE STRIPP 99.83
._ ._. .._
STREET LIGHTING MENARDS SAND/PAINT ROLLERS-ST LI 84.84
STREET LIGHTING MILLERBERND PAINT FOR LIGHT POLES 110.76
STREET LIGHTING RADKE ELECTRIC BUCKET TRUCK W/ ELECTRIC 125.00
STREET LIGHTING RADXE ELECTRIC BUCKET TRUCK W/ ELECTRIC 125.00
Total for Department 6313 627.22*
.Senior Center FIRST NAT'L BANK SR CENTER SEPT 2000 PMT 1,527.35
Senior Center HATTICK GLASS GROUP SIDE LITH-SR CENTER 311.20
Total for Department 6521 1,838.55*
RETIREE'S HEALTH INS MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 20.30
Total for Department 6922 20.30*
INSURANCES LEAGUE/IMI CITIES INS WORK COMP PREMIUM ADJUST 24,991.00
Total for Department 6923 24,991.00*
Total for Fund 101 81,063.95*
PARKS/RECREATION BAHLS SERVICE TUBES 32.50
PARKS/RECREATION CUSHMAN MOTORS RIM/VALVE 23.17
PARKS/RECREATION DOERER'S GENUINE PAR CLEANER 35.53
PARKS/RECREATION DOERER'S GENUINE PAR D EARTH 10.42
PARKS/RECREATION DOERER'S GENUINE PAR FITTING/HOSE 27.45
PARKS/RECREATION DOERER'S GENUINE PAR HEATER HOSE 6,77
PARKS/RECREATION DOERER'S GENUINE PAR HEATER HOSE/ANTIFREEZE 23.77
PARKS/RECREATION DOERER'S GENUINE PAR OIL 5.50
PARKS/RECREATION DOERER'S GENUINE,PAR PART 3.18
PARKS/RECREATION DOERER'S GENUINE PAR U-BOLT 6.52
PARKS/RECREATION ERICKSON LEE MPSA MTG EXP-ERICKSON 100.98
PARKS/RECREATION FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 105.48
PARKS/RECREATION MIDTOWN FOOD CENTER TREE TRUST OPEN HOUSE LU 69.26
PARKS/RECREATION MINNEGASCO,ACCr'S PA JULY GAS 48.90
PARKS/RECREATION MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 60.00
PARKS/RECREATION MTI DISTRIBUTING COM NEEDLE VALVE/TURF LABOR/ 872.41
PARKS/RECREATION MTI DISTRIBUTING COM RECTANGULAR LIGHT 165.30
PARKS/RECREATION MTI DISTRIBUTING COM TUBE 46.26
PARKS/RECREATION MTI DISTRIBUTING COM WHEEL SPINDLE/BRG CONE/S 222.54
Date: 08/03/2000 Time: 13:42:41 Operator: LYNNE BENSON '
Page: 5
City of Hastings
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
PARKS/RECREATION MTI DISTRIBUTING COM WHEEL/TIRE/SEAL KITS/HEA 481.38
PARKS/RECREATION NORTHERN STATES POWE JULY ELECTRIC 744.47
PARKS/RECREATION RADKE ELECTRIC BALLFIELD LIGHTS 374.80
PARKS/RECREATION RADKE ELECTRIC BASE LAMP 45.00
PARKS/RECREATION RADKE ELECTRIC GFI OUTLET-BALLFIELD 68.95
PARKS/RECREATION RADKE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 459.00
PARKS/RECREATION SHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT 165.08
PARKS/RECREATION SHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT/SUPPLIES 274.39
PARKS/RECREATION SOLBERG AGGREGATE CO AGGREGATE 85.16
PARKS/RECREATION SPRINT JULY PHONE 188.81
PARKS/RECREATION TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE BATTERIES 3.60
PARKS/RECREATION TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE CABLE TIES 18.09
PARKS/RECREATION TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE GLUE 3.93
2" i j iiE'3c'-niniivar TERRi�6 Ai:z xi nLiRARE GLUE CONST a.,.
P. /RECREATION TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE NUT LOCK/SCREW 2.94
PARKS/RECREATION TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE OIL 7.60
PARKS/RECREATION TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE SCREWS/ANCHOR/SOCKET 15.22
PARKS/RECREATION TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE SCREWS/ANCHORS 2.77
PARKS/RECREATION TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE SILVER SPRAY PAINT 10.20
PARKS/RECREATION TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE TERINAL BATTERY POST 1.27
PARKS/RECREATION TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE WASHER/HOLT .22
Total for Department 6520 4,827.10*
Total for Fund 200 4,827.10*
AQUATIC CENTER JOHNSON, DARBIE A.D REIMBURSE POOL SUPPLIES 72.24
AQUATIC CENTER METROCALL PAGER SERVICE 11.25
AQUATIC CENTER MILLER ELECTRICAL I REPAIR POLE LIGHT 263.68
AQUATIC CENTER MILLER ELECTRICAL I WIRE A/C CONCESSIONS 477.44
AQUATIC CENTER MINNEGASCO,ACCf'S PA JULY GAS 6,260.66
AQUATIC CENTER RIVER VALLEY CLINIC HEP B - FILKINS 65.00
Ad"TIC CENTER RIVER VALLEY CLINIC HEP B - SHOEN 32.00
A .IC CENTER RIVER VALLEY CLINIC HEP B - WITTNEBEL 60.00
AQUATIC CENTER RIVER VALLEY CLINIC IMMUNIZATION - SHOEN 9.00
AQUATIC CENTER RIVER VALLEY CLINIC . IMMUNIZATION - WITTNEBEL 9.00
AQUATIC CENTER WAL MART STORE #01-1 DISPOSABLE CAMERA 7.21
AQUATIC CENTER WAL MART STORE #01-1 POOL SUPPLIES 58.60
Total for Department 6511 7,326.08*
Total for Fund 201 7,326.08*
FIRE BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES TIRE 55.68
FIRE CHRISTIANSON, MICHAE 64 MG RAM 208.22
FIRE CHRISTIANSON, MICHAE PAPER SHREDDER 311.40
FIRE CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUI FIRE EQUIP 64.00
FIRE CLASSY'S SAFETY EQUI HELMETS 520.85
FIRE DAKOTA CNTY TREAS-AU DAKOTA CO FUEL CHGS MAY- 975.11
FIRE DELTA INDUSTRIES MFG HOSE TESTER 3,385.12
FIRE DOERER'S GENUINE PAR BULB 9.90
FIRE DOERER'S GENUINE PAR HOSE ENDS 54.03
Date: 08/03/2000 Time: 13:42:41 Operator: LYNNE BENSON '
Page: 6
City of Hastings
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
FIRE EMERGENCY APPARATUS REPAIRS - 1480 2,252.39
FIRE FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 182.20
FIRE GATEWAY COMPANIES IN PERSONAL COMPUTERS 7,459.40
FIRE GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPP CABLE . 16.16
FIRE GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPP PORTABLE PROJECTOR/DESK) 3,924.01
FIRE GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPP SCANNER 488.94
FIRE H & H INDUSTRIES INC LIGHT BULBS 144.05
FIRE MINNEGASCO,ACCT'S PA JULY GAS 90.26
FIRE MN STATE FIRE CHIEFS ANNUAL CONFERENCE-HOLMES 135.00
FIRE MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 97.50
FIRE P.E.R.A. EMPLOYER SHARE/LIABILITY 742.53
FIRE PRIMEDIA WORKPLACE L TRAINING INFO 581.49
FIRE SPRINT JULY PHONE _ 639.53
FIRE - WAL MART STORE p01-1 CUPS 12.40
FIRE WAL MART STORE $01-1 CUPS/CARD/CLEANING SUPPL 20.46
FIRE WAL MART STORE #01-1 TISSUE PAPER/LEGAL PADS 102.43
FIRE XEROX CORPORATION MONTHLY MAINT AGREEMENT 144.87
FIRE ZOLL MEDICAL CORP DEFIBRULATION PADS 470.00
Total for Department 6220 23,087.93*
AMBULANCE DAKOTA CNTY TREAS-AU DAKOTA CO FUEL CHGS MAY- 675.39
AMBULANCE MCGOON, DONNA OVERPMT CALL 20000071 313.81
AMBULANCE ORION INDUSTRIES, IN AMBULANCE SLED 3,212.03
AMBULANCE PARR EMERGENCY,INC AMB SUPPLIES 62.78
AMBULANCE REGINA MEDICAL CENTE AMB SUPPLES 7/20 STMT 253.84
AMBULANCE REGINA MEDICAL CENTE SUPPLIES 6/20/00 168.21
AMBULANCE REINARDY, HERBERT OVERPMT CALL 20000710 274.99
AMBULANCE ROTHER, FLORIAN OVERPMT CALL 20000363 276.74
AMBULANCE WAL MART STORE #01-1 COMFORT CURV 37.48
Total for Department 6230 5,275.27*
Total for Fund 213 28,363.20*
OTHER SERVICES/CHARG BOLTON & MENK INC L/D ROAD 4,004.83
Total for Department 6700 4,004.83*
Total for Fund 400 4,004.83*
VETS BIKE TRAIL P.E.R.A. EMPLOYER SHARE/LIABILITY 60.92
Total for Department 6788 60.92*
Total for Fund 401 60.92*
ADMINISTRATION FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 12.95
Total for Department 6631 12.95•
Total for Fund 402 12.95*
OTHER SERVICES/CHARG EMERGENCY VEHICLE SU CONVERT EQUIP TO NEW SQU 3,086.92
Total for Department 6700 3,086.92*
Date: 08/03/2000 Time: 13:42:42 Operator: LYNNE BENSON '
Page: 7
City of Hastings
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
Total for Fund 403 3,086.92*
ADMINISTRATION MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 6.75
Total for Department 6631 6.75*
OPERATIONS COLOR LAB INC.(PHOTO PROCESS FILM 26.59
Total for Department 6632 26.59*
REHABILITATION FIRST NAT'L BANK LOAN-705 VERMILLION-GRIE 20,000.00
Total for Department 6633 20,000.00*
Total for Fund 404 20,033.34*
U` 6antiiC85�.:iievcJ sok IS a..a FryJ 1rvS AUGUST PREMIUM 11.70
O'. SERVICES/CHARG MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 1.50
Total for Department 6700 13.20*
Total for Fund 407 13.20*
WATER AMERICAN WATERWORKS AWWA MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 105.00
WATER COLOR LAB INC.(PHOTO DEVELOP FILM 13.72
WATER DAKOTA CNTY TREAS-AU DAKOTA CO FUEL CHGS MAY- 1,230.48
WATER DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSN JULY ELECTRIC 25.83
WATER ELECTRO WATCHMAN, IN FIRE ALARM REPAIR 136.82
WATER FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 83.74
WATER GOODIN CO. REPAIR FOUNTAIN 146.26
WATER GRAYBAR ELECTRIC SPLICE CONNECTORS 152.39
WATER HEAD LITES CORPORATI SAFETY VESTS 211.06
WATER HEUSSER, JAMES PARKIING 4.00
WATER MINNEGASCO,ACCT'S PA JULY GAS 123.91
WATER MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 38.75
WA-R NORTHERN STATES POWE JULY ELECTRIC 23.44
W. SHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT & SUPPLIES 121.87
WATER SOLBERG AGGREGATE CO RIP RAP 704.21
WATER SPRINT JULY PHONE 277.06
WATER T.D.'S CLEANING JULY JANITORIAL PUBLIC W 319.50
WATER WAL MART STORE #01-1 MISC SUPPLIES 41.93
Total for Department 7100 3,759.97*
Total for Fund 600 3,759.97*
WASTEWATER DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSN JULY ELECTRIC 23.64
WASTEWATER FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 34.47
WASTEWATER HOESCHEN, JAMES B. BOOTS-WOHLERS 110.00
WASTEWATER HOESCHEN, JAMES B. REPAIR BOOTS-ZGODA 59.00
WASTEWATER MN POLLUTION CONTROL CLASS SC OPERATOR CERT-P 23.00
WASTEWATER MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 16.25
WASTEWATER NINE EAGLES GOLF CO. SHIRTS-RUEDY 84.10
WASTEWATER NORTHERN STATES POWE JULY ELECTRIC 394.56
WASTEWATER QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS PUMP REPAIR 282.75
Date: 08/03/2000 Time: 13:42:42 Operator: LYNNE BENSON
Page: B
City of Hastings
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
Total for Department 7300 1,027.77*
Total for Fund 601 1,027.77*
TRANSIT AT&T WIRELESS SERVIC TRAC CELL PHONE 11.36
TRANSIT FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 22.10
TRANSIT MN BODY & EQUIPMENT SWITCH FOR TRAC BUS .77
TRANSIT MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 6.30
TRANSIT SPRINT JULY PHONE 107.61
TRANSIT TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE TRAC KEYS .94
TRANSIT WHITEWATER WIRELESS, REPAIR TRAC RADIO .32
Total for Department 7500 149.40*
TRANSIT-OPERATIONS FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 12.27
TRANSIT-OPERATIONS PINKERTON SERVICES G PRE EMPL DRUG TEST-HOESL 68.00
TRANSIT-OPERATIONS PINKERTON SERVICES G QUARTERLY DRUG TESTING 94.50
Total for Department 7501 174.77*
TRANSIT-MAINTENANCE DAKOTA CNTY TREAS-AU DAKOTA CO FUEL CHGS MAY- 1,213.76
TRANSIT-MAINTENANCE MN BODY & EQUIPMENT SWITCH FOR TRAC BUS 15.38
TRANSIT-MAINTENANCE TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE TRAC KEYS 14.45
TRANSIT-MAINTENANCE WHITEWATER WIRELESS, REPAIR TRAC RADIO 745.99
Total for Department 7502 1,989.58*
Total for Fund 610 2,313.75*
CIVIC ARENA BECKER ARENA PRODUCT RED & BLUE LINE BOARDS 49.08
CIVIC ARENA DOERER'S GENUINE PAR BAT TERMINAL 4.03
CIVIC ARENA FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM 33.59
CIVIC ARENA LET'S PLAY HOCKEY LET'S PLAY HOCKEY SUB 490.00
CIVIC ARENA MINNEGASCO,ACCT'S PA JULY GAS 2,870.52
CIVIC ARENA MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 15.00
CIVIC ARENA SHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT 10.11
CIVIC ARENA SPRINT JULY PHONE 164.04
CIVIC ARENA TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE ANCHOR NAILS 5.81
CIVIC ARENA TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE CABLE 19.01
CIVIC ARENA TERRY'S ACE HARDWARE ELBOW - PVC 1.98
Total for Department 7700 3,663.17*
Total for Fund 615 3,663.17*
HYDROELECTRIC FORTIS BENEFITS INS AUGUST PREMIUM + 14.08
HYDROELECTRIC MASTER MECHANICAL IN SERVICE CALL 302.00
HYDROELECTRIC MINNESOTA MUTUAL AUGUST PREMIUM 7.50
HYDROELECTRIC MOTOR PARTS SERVICE PARTS 16.57
HYDROELECTRIC NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONE CHARGES 398.22
HYDROELECTRIC SPRINT JULY PHONE 48.15
Total for Department 7900 786.52*
Total for Fund 620 786.52*
Date: 08/03/2000 Time: 13:42:43 Operator: LYNNE BENSON '
Page: 9
City of Hastings
FM Entry - invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
Grand Total 160,343.67*
August 7, 2000
APPROVED:
City Administrator
Finance Director
Councilmember Simacek
Councilmember Riveness
Councilmember Johnson
Councilmember Moratzka
Councilmember Hicks
Councilmember Yandrasits
Mayor Werner
VI - 2
MEMO
Date: August 3, 2000
To: Mayor City/C�Pouncilor hers
From: cN a
Subject: Authorize Advertisement for Bids Outdoor Hockey Rink Civic Arena
Staff is asking permission to advertise for bid for the construction of an outdoor hockey rink
behind the Civic Arena. The advertisement to solicit bids would be published in the Hastings Star
Gazette on August 10*& 171e, 2000 and in the Construction Bulletin on August 11te& 18te,
2000. Sealed bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. Friday, August 25 , 2000. All work is to be
completed by October 15, 2000.
The construction of the proposed outdoor hockey rink at the Civic Arena was approved under the
Joint Powers 2000/2001 Budget. The City will be responsible for 70%of the costs of the rink
and School District 200 will pay 30%. The outdoor hockey rink will be constructed the same as
the current rink at Lions Park.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call me.
jt
V' V
..:....:;:.:.:.. .....yy... :::
To: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers
From: Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk
Date: August 2, 2000
Re: Election Judges for Primary and General Elections
Recommended City Council Action:
Approve the attached list of election judges at the Primary and General Elections and
authorize the polling places listed below.
As In 1998,the three churchoo-and Armory will be used as polling places. ,
1"Ward National Guard Armory 3050 Red Wing Boulevard
2"d Ward Our Saviours Lutheran Church 400 West 9`, Street_
3"' Ward United Methodist Church 615 West 15t' Street
4�' Ward St. Philip's Lutheran Church 1401 West 15"' Street
Because of the requirement to balance Parties in Section 2048.19 of the Minnesota
Election Laws, staff may need to reassign judges as needed to different Wards. All the
judges will not be working the full day of election, as some of them may be working an
afternoon or morning shift only on election days,others will serve as alternates in the event
a backup judge is required. In the event we, receive additional interest by Individuals
interested in serving as electlorn judges prior to election training dates,we will invite them
to serve as judges or alternates.
Staff will most likely be, submitting a similar list that will be finalized for the General
Election before November. Staff will be contacting the Hastings High School for interest
in having students serve as trainee election judges for the General Election.
Please refer to the attachments for the list of judges.
Background:
The City of Hastings is holding a Primary"Election for two of the four Ward Seats.
Therefore,according to the Secretary of State,a Special Meeting to canvass results of the
Primary Election is required no later than two days following the Primary elections of
Tuesday, September 12,2000. Therefore,staff will also be requesting that a Special City
Council meeting be set for Thursday, September 14, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. to canvass the
results.
Attachment:
1. Primary List of Election Judges
2000 Primary Election Judges
Need a minimum of 9 judges for each ward
Ward 1
Head Judge Device Kohn R 437-2241
Assistant Head Judge Vince Tauber R 437-5438
Judge Pat Fox D 437-9250
Judge Ann Stoffel D 437-5724
Judge Carol Scully D 438-3500
Judge Lorraine Tri D 437-8274
Judge Margaret Hicks R 437-9624
Judge Dora Hinton R 437-9316
Judge Nancy%weres D 437-7904
Judge Rose Luckner R 437-4795
Judea Gloria 5toneberg. D 437-5518
Judge Mavis Meiers R 437-1998
Judge Arleen WiIlake R 437-5106
13 total 6 D,7R
Absentees
Janice Niederkorn D 437-9010
Beverly Bacon R 437-5437
Pat Pederson R 437-3456
3 total 11), 2R
Ward 2
Head Judge Mary Tauber R 437-5438
Assistant Head Judge Fern Mjolsnese R 437-3683
Judge Carol Allen D 438-9123
Judge Llewellyn Linde D 437-1646
Judge Helen McDonald D 437-4575
Judge Cindy Towe D 437-2753
Judge Mary Ellen Olson D 437-7033
Judge Patricia'Mathison R 438-3555
Judge Susan Cruse R 437-1767
Judge Iona Holme R 437-6915
Judge Rose Sieben R 437-9766
Judge Katherine Siemens D 437-6765
12 Total 6D 6R
Ward 3
Head Judge Anthony Along! D 438-9320
Assistant Head Judge Janice Niederkorn D 437-9394
Judge Janice Burr D 437-3340
Judge Kahtleen Lee D 437-7275
Judge Patricia Milliren R 437-9388
Judge Shirley Wenig R 438-3837
Judge Dorothy TutewohI R 437-9543
Judge Marge Trautmann R 437-9623
Judge Suzanne Schrader R 437-4193
Judge Wa Rex Metcalf R 437-2106
Judge Janet McNamara D 437-1935
Judge Mary Cedar D 437-7042
Judge Helen Ruedy D 437-3848
Judge Regina Jones D 437-6911
Judge Charle6 Cragoe R 437-1543
Judge Phyllis McConnell R 437-2068
16 total 8D,8R
Ward 4
Head Judge John Schutt R 437-3281
Ass16tant Jeanne McGree D 437-5155
Aoeir,tant Char Rondeau R 437-3621
Judge Joan Moe6 R 437-4005
Judge Ann Knoll D 437-9758
Judge Marlene 5wan6on D 437-9495
Judge Muriel Fletcher D 437-2477
Judge Melva Jane Proechel R 437-3682
Judge Elizabeth Schmitz R 437-7853
Judge 5h!rle Stevens R 437-1392
Judge LaVonne Oloon R 437-6359
Judge Sheila ,.Toner, D 437-6282
Judge Dorie Cragoe D 437-1543
Judge Charlotte A. 5toudt D 437-4302
14 total 71),7R
VI - 4
CITY OF HASTINGS
DAKOTA COUNTY,MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 08- -00
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING ELECTION JUDGE WAGES
WHEREAS,the City of Hastings will be conducting both primary and general elections this
fall for municipal, state, and federal offices; and,
WHEREAS,the City Council recognizes that a wage increase for election judges from 1998
wages is appropriate.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hastings that
the following wages for election judges are effective upon passage of this Resolution:
Election Judges $6.00/Hour;
Assistant Head Judges $6.75/Hour;
Head Judge $7.00/Hour.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA THIS
7'hDAY of AUGUST, 2000.
Michael D. Werner
Mayor
ATTEST:
Melanie Mesko
Administrative Assistant/City Clerk
(SEAL)
VI - 5
�EM��NCJUM
TO: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers
FROM: Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk
DATE: August 2, 2000
RE: Special Council Meeting
Council Action Requested:
Set a Special City Council Meeting on Thursday, September 14, 2000 to canvass the
results of the September 12, 2000 primary election.
Background:
Per State Statute 205.185, subd. 3, cities are required to canvass the returns and
declare the results of the municipal primary election within two days of the primary.
Following the five-day contest period, a certificate of election will be issued to the
top two vote-getters in each of the two wards. Those four candidates (two in each
ward) will then have their names put on the ballot for the general election.
V1 - 6
MEMORANDUM
To: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers
From: Melanie Mcoko, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk
Date: August 2,2000
Re: Approval 3.2% On-5ale, On-5ale 5unday, & Wine Licenses at Oliviceo Grove
Pizza & Pasta,1223 Vermillion Street
Council Action Requested:
Approve the application of 3.2% on-sale liquor,Sunday on-sale and wine liquor licenses at
Oliver's Grove Pizza & Pasta (1223 Vermilion 5treet), owned by Bruce Groshens.
Background:
Mr. Groshen5 has located a restaurant by the name of Oliveeo Grove Pizza & Pasta in the
former Godfather's location. He 15 requesting the issuance of a 3.2% on-Gale,a 5un6lay on-
5ale, and a wine liquor license at Oliver-?o Grove. Mr. Gro5hen5 has completed all
application materials and a succe55ful background check has been conducted.. This license
would be in effect through June 30, 2001.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to let me know.
Attachments:
1. Resolution
Application materials on file
CITY OF HASTINGS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 08- -00
RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR LIQUOR LICENSE
AT OLIVER'S GROVE PIZZA & PASTA
WHEREAS, the Bruce Groshens has presented an application to the City of
Hastings for a 3.2%on-sale, Sunday on-sale, and wine liquor license at Oliver's Grove Pizza
& Pasta, 1223 Vermillion Street, Hastings, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, all necessary paperwork has been received and a successful background
check has been conducted by the Hastings Police Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Hastings that the Mayor and Administrative Assistant/City Clerk are authorized and
directed to sign this resolution approving the liquor license at Oliver's Grove Pizza&Pasta,
1223 Vermillion Street to Bruce Groshens.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS THIS 7`
DAY OF AUGUST, 2000.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Michael D. Werner, Mayor
Melanie Mesko,Administrative Assistant/Ciity Clerk
(SEAL)
V1 - 7
August 2, 2000
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: John Grossman
RE: Repair street lights in Industrial Park
The lights on the north side of Spiral Boulevard are all out because the wires
between the poles are shot. In the 1970s the wires were installed without conduit.
The Street Department has asked for quotes to rewire and install conduit so that all
the lights work. Several companies have been asked but only one was received,
from Radke Electric, for $12,150. Other companies who typically do this work say
they cannot get to it this summer and are not willing to quote. Based on quotes
received earlier to rewire both sides of Spiral, this estimate is realistic.
The Industrial Park Board recommends that the repair be made and paid from the
Industrial Park Construction Fund. Conduit can be installed in other areas when
repairs are needed.
Recommendation: Authorize Radke Electric to do the work at the estimated cost.
C:\WDeTr\Profdes Vosv \PmwnaMPB\11&ftq r.mmo.wpa
RADKE ELECTRIC, INC.
2216 VERMILLION ST
HASTINGS, MN 55033
JULY 59 2000
CITY OF HASTINGS
STREETS DEPT.
101 E. 4TH ST
c/o CAL RUEDY
HASTINGS, MN 55033
RE: INDUSTRIA_ L PARK LIGHTING
REPLACE - REPAIR UNDERGROUND WIRES
INSTALL PVC PIPE
2500 FEET PVC PIPE --------------------------------------EST.
2500 FEET TRENCHING-----------------------------------EST.
10,000 FEET XLP (wire)------------------------------------EST.
LOCATIONS
MISC - FITTINGS - GLUE - TAPE - KEARNEYS-----EST.
BACKHOLE RENTAL---------------------------------------EST.
STATE ELECTRICAL PERMIT
ESTIMATED JOB COST (LABOR & MATERIAL) $12,150.00
Cutting and re lac went pf blacktop by others
jadkHN P. RADKE, ow r
e Electric, Inc.
A - 8
August 2, 2000
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: John Grossman, Industrial Park Director
RE: Amendment to Miller Electric Development Agreement
The City and Arthur"Bud" Miller have agreed to the purchase of a one acre site in
the Industrial Park for a new building for Miller Electric. The agreement includes
the land credit program which provides for the sale of the lot for $1.00 and deferral
of the balance of the value, $43,559, for five years. A building credit and payroll
credit applied against the balance at the end of five years can reduce or eliminate the
balance owned to the City.
The quotes Mr. Miller has received for excavation and new fill include charges
attributed to the soil conditions. Due to the depth of the top soil, more material
needs to be removed beneath floor slabs and parking lots, and replaced with more
fill than would normally be the case. The excavator estimates the additional cost of
excavation and fill due to the conditions to be $13,700 - see the attached quotation.
This has always been a condition in the park. The Industrial Park Board allowed
sand to be taken from the city lot on Commerce Court at no cost to help alleviate the
condition until the fall of 1998. No more material can be taken from that lot.
Mr. Miller asked if the City could help with the excavation and fill costs. It seems
reasonable to reduce the unpaid value of the land to recognize the soil condition.
The effect on the City would be to reduce the amount that Mr. Miller would have to
pay back in the event he did not meet his job goals or the building and payroll
credits did not exceed the unpaid balance.
Although the Park Board has not had the opportunity to consider this request, they
did approve this concept while dealing with Diversified Manufacturing.
Recommendation: Authorize the Mayor and Clerk to execute an amendment to the
Purchase and Development Agreement and the Business Subsidy agreement, to
reduce the unpaid balance due on the land (the subsidy) by $13,700 to allow for the
soil conditions on that specific lot. The balance would be $29,899.
M I L L E IZ ELECTRICS Inc.
ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR
3550 VERMILLION ARTHUR G. 'BUD" MILLER (651)437-8535
HASTINGS, MINNESOTA 55033 OWNER FAX (651)437-2112
August 3,2000
John Grossman
City of Hastings
101 East 0 Street
Hastings,IvLN 55033
John:
Here is the information on the extra cost of soil correction at 2620 Industrial Court.
This number represents the amount of money to remove the extra black dirt and replace it with sand and
compact it.
This cost is above what is considered typical.
Sincerely,
MILLER ELECDUC,INC.
--?W
Arthur G.`Bud'Miller,Jr.
President
QUOTATION
FROM: Date: August 3, 2000
Ginther Excavating, Inc.
Richard Ginther
1930 Oak St.
Hastings,MN 55033
651-437-8922
To:
Miller Electric
3550 Vermillion St
Hastings,MN 55033
We are pleased to quote on your inquiry as follows:
DESCRIPTION
Description of work:
Work to be done at Industrial Park in Hastings
Normally there is 5 to 6 inches of black dirt on a build able lot. There is approximately
2 feet of black dirt on this lot. Quantity of black dirt in building pad approximately 725
yards.
Quantity of black dirt in parking lot approximately 725 yards. Quantity of black dirt in
entrance approximately 110 yards. Sand needed for job approximately 2000 yards
compacted.
Sand is$5.75 per yard hauled in and compacted. Approximate cost of stripping excess black
dirt$2,200.00.
Rich Ginther
S fy6/✓hi�2Gl : 7-1 Z00
Suv�d l , SOo (2000 x
�3, Boa
VIII-A-1
MEMO
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Tom Montgomery
Subject: Planning Committee Recommendations
General Sieben Dr. Extension
Date: August 3, 2000
The Planning Committee of the City Council will meet at 5:30 PM on Monday, August
7`h to review the cost estimates for additional studies of the General Sieben Dr. extension
aliginnent alternatives. The Committee's recommendations willbe forwarded to tho Comicil iGr
action.
MEMO
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
From: Tom Montgomery
Subject: Planning Committee Meeting
5:30 PM,Monday, August 7, 2000
General Sieben Dr. Extension
Date: July 26, 2000
The Planning Committee of the City Council has scheduled a meeting for 5:30 PM,
Mda;iy,August 7t'to review cost estimates for further studyof the two altertiatives'for
extending General Sieben Dr. to connect to CR#48. The Planning Committee met on June 21"
to discuss the two General Sieben Dr. routes, one following the river through the Bauer property
to connect to CR#48, and the other route continuing along the west Wallin property line,
bridging the Vermillion River to connect to CR#48.
Todd Rapp attended the Planning Committee meeting representing the Wallins. Mr.
Rapp noted that the Council had already approved a concept plan for the Wallin development and
a City comprehensive plan that both showed General Sieben Dr. paralleling the river to connect
to CR#48. Mr. Rapp stated that it was not fair or appropriate to put the burden of constructing
General Sieben Dr. on the Wallin development, noting the area wide significance of the road.
Mr. Willard Bauer also attended the meeting. Mr. Bauer stated that he was opposed to
both annexation and development of his property. Mr. Bauer noted that quarry operations nearby
would be continuing for many more years and was concerned about the impact of his quarry
operation towards any housing development along a General Sieben Dr. alignment that would
run through his property.
Questions were raised about the revised cost estimates for the two road alignments.
While some soil boring information is available on the Wallin property, no soil borings have
been taken on the Bauer property. Rock excavation is a large cost item.
The Planning Committee directed staff to get cost estimates for additional soil borings
and updating the alignment cost estimates. In addition, staff was directed to get appraisal costs
for both acquiring the needed right of way for the two General Sieben Dr. alignment options, and
appraisal costs for a benefits analysis for both alternatives in order to determine how much of the
General Sieben Dr. extension project costs can&e assessed.
Proposals have been received from Bolton and Menk, Braun Intertec and BRKW
Appraisers. These additional studies will cost a total of$25,000. The additional soil borings and
updating the cost estimates are expected to cost$7,000. The right of way appraisals for the two
alternatives will cost$9,000. The benefits analysis for the two alternatives will also cost $9,000.
cc: Todd Rapp
Willard Bauer
� nnnnu ►► ii ��� �4�'� ��� tri ��'
,���E�r��� ��o���� m���i� ■11111■�
��'� 11►��1 � � i� uvnp
11 1 300 611 Feet
� i I ill �i it JI i W iIW�
•70
til�5yil � '1i,i�V,� ��u�� .. ��il�� � �I►.r
IN
is
� PI11��
i1° Ali � �d 7111 lil IU,pu V�' If��! � I��y'�(5T ■��
iM�' (
z 16 �J �, Id 1t� it i 'r1 1 •� M��� ��P, 'RC1�1'Y� �� �i� PbS.P l' l�
y k J 1�'i
��N
��I��)��� ���4��I��i���l�ii��V�i�i��i1����� �������� �i� (q�k�� 1 t wl §1��^� ✓Y �'... >Y�7� � �'�u a �1 ,��i I) i��.
11��4U
k.,M'71,
�� '71, EPEE
r E�1i;'�P ,��IAJ�
Il � 9� �� i�1
4?JJill
® ®1
BO I_TON NA;== N K
Consulting Engineers & Surveyors
1515 East Highway 13 • Burnsville, MN 55337-6857
Phone (952) 890-0509 • FAX (952) 890-8065
July 3, 2000
Mr. Tom Montgomery,P.E.
Director of Public Works
City of Hastings
101 East 4th Street
Hastings, MN 55033-1955
RE: Proposal for Additional Services
General Sieben Drive Extension Study
Hastings,MN
BMI Project No. T11.20174
Dear Mr. Montgomery:
In accordance with the request of the City of Hastings'Planning Committee,we are pleased to offer
the following proposal for the above referenced project. This proposal is based upon our discussion
at our June 21, 2000 meeting. As a part of this proposal, we have defined the scope of work and
have included an estimate of fees for our professional engineering and surveying services.
I. Scope of Work
The City of Hastings has been considering extending General Sieben Drive south, to an
intersection with County Road 48. The two alternatives for this extension that the City has
been evaluating include routing General Sieben to the southwest, around the Vermillion
River, or extending General Sieben due south,bridging over the Vermillion River.
A report and a subsequent Addendum No. 1 have been composed by Bolton&Menk, Inc.
(BMI) for the City estimating the initial construction costs and life-cycle costs of each
alternative. The documents were created based on assumptions of existing bedrock
elevations and test pits dug near the proposed alignment alternatives.
This proposal is requested for the preparation of Addendum No. 2. This addendum will
involve soil explorations and bedrock locations by Braun Intertec, and will offer revised
initial construction costs and life-cycle costs of each alternative. The following specific tasks
are proposed to be completed for this Addendum:
A. Alignment Staking
BMI will stake the"cut" sections of each alignment as well as the proposed boring
locations for Braun Intertec. Because no survey work has been completed in this area
by the City, it is anticipated that the staked alignments will have to be tied into City
MANKATO • FAIRMONT • SLEEPY EYE • BURNSVILLE • WILLMAR
AMES, IA • LIBERTY, MO
An Equal Opportunity Employer
monumentation to the north,near the end of the existing General Sieben Drive.BMI
requests that the City furnish any GIS,survey,or control information that may assist
in the'staking of the alignments.
B. Soils Exploration
BMI will acquire a geotechnical report from Braun Intertec as described in their
attached proposal.
C. Coordination with Braun Intertec
BMI will coordinate work with Braun Intertec for the purposes of locating soil
borings and discussing the results of the geotechnical evaluation.
D. Written Report(Addendum No. 2)
BMI will prepare Addendum No. 2 based on the geotechnical report prepared by
Braun Intertec. Addendum No. 2 will reevaluate the initial construction costs and
rife-cycle cosis of eat;h aiginneni alternative.
II. Estimate of Fees
A. Alignment Staking $1,840
B. Soils Exploration(Invoiced Directory to City) $4,050
C. Coordination with Braun Intertec $ 300
D. Written Report, Addendum No. 2 820
Total Estimated Fee $79010
City required meetings will be billed at an hourly rate.
We look forward to providing these professional engineering and surveying services to the City of
Hastings. Your verbal approval of this proposal may serve as our notice to proceed. Please call me
at(952) 890-0509 if you have any questions or are ready to proceed.
Sincerely,
BOLTON&MENK, INC.
�GfA LGA L- X /--7Aow
Marcus A. Thomas, P.E,
Project Engineer
cc: Mark D. Kasma, P.E.,BMI Office Manager
Enclosure
F:\_Civi1\HAS'nT 1120174\montgomery703.wpd
sN Braun tntertec Corporation
BRAUN6950 West 146th Street,Suite 131
N T E RT E C Apple Valley,Minnesota 55124.8520
612,4314493 Fax:4313084
Engineers and Scientists Serving
the Built and Natural Environments''
June 30,2000 Cost Estimate BODX-00-PO45
Mr.Marcus Thomas
Bolton&Menk,Inc.
1515 East Highway 13
Burnsville,MN 55337-6857
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Re: Cost Estimate for Bedrock Depth Evaluation, Proposed General Sieben Drive
Connections to County Road 46,Hastings, Minnesota
-As-you requested in our site meeting on June 28,-2000,we are pleased to provide this cost
estimate to Bolton&Menk and the City of Hastings fora bedrock depth evaluation for:the
proposed General Sieben Drive connection to County Road 46. We will furnish the services
described in our attached scope of services for$4,050.
We anticipate the field work for this project can be started within one and a half weeks of
receipt of authorization to proceed and should be completed in one and a half days.
Approximately one week will be required for laboratory testing and preparation of our
engineering report. Verbal results and recommendations will be reported to you during and
after completion of the drilling program.
We appreciate the opportunity to present this cost estimate. It is being presented in duplicate
so, if acceptable after.your review, one copy may be retained for your records and one copy
may be signed and returned by U.S. mail or faxed in its entirety, including the General
Conditions, to us as authorization to proceed. We have provided a return envelope for your
convenience.
If there are questions regarding this cost estimate, please call James Samuelson at
(952) 431-4493. We look forward to being part of the design and construction team.
Si cerei ,
.v
aures amuelson
Manager/Principal
Attachments:
Project Cost Estimate
Signature Page
General Conditions, 2/1/96
jms:rlb\proposals\OOP045
Bolton &Menk, Inc.
Cost Estimate BODX-00-PO45
June 30,2000
Page 2
Project CQSt Estimate
Description of Project
It is our understanding the City of Hastings is proposing to extend General Sieben Drive south
to County Road 46. Two alternate routes are being considered on the south end of the
alignment. One alignment will be to the southwest through the Bauer property and the other
alignment will be south through the Wallin property with a bridge over the Cannon River.
The purpose of the geotechnical evaluation is to assist Bolton &Menk and the City of Hastings
in determining bedrock depths along both alignments in the cut areas.
Scope of Services
We understand that Bolton & Menk, Inc., will stake the boring locations and determine surface
elevations. Braun Intertec will coordinate the clearing of public utilities.
We are proposing about seven standard penetration test borings along the Bauer property
alignment and five standard penetration test borings along the Wallin property alignment to
assist in evaluating the soil conditions and bedrock surface elevations. We have assumed that
the standard penetration test borings will be taken to a maximum depth of about 15 feet below
existing grade and penetration tests will be conducted at 2'h-foot intervals to a depth of 15 feet.
Power auger borings may be taken to better define the bedrock depths between the standard
penetration test boring locations. If groundwater is encountered, its depth will be recorded on
the boring logs. Based on our site reconnaissance, the boring locations are accessible to a
track or flotation-tire mounted drill rig. The boring locations may be altered by our field crew
to those proposed to facilitate accessibility because of the heavy woods along portions of the
alignment. We estimate the cost of the drilling services at$3,000.
Minnesota Department of Health regulations require us to grout any boring which encounters a
waterbearing stratum and either penetrates a confining layer or is extended deeper than 25 feet.
For grouting, we will charge an additional $2.50 per foot. If it is necessary to extend or grout
borings, we will contact you before we exceed the drilling budget. We reserve the right,
however, to delete borings from the proposed drilling program to offset the cost of deeper
borings or grouting.
Samples will be returned to our laboratory where they will be visually classified and logged by
a geotechnical engineer. Some routine laboratory tests may be conducted to assist in evaluating
the suitability of the on-site soils for use as engineered fill. Potential tests include moisture
content and gradation tests. We have budgeted $50 for laboratory testing.
After our laboratory tests have been completed, a engineering evaluation report will then be
prepared. The report will summarize the subsurface soil and groundwater conditions at the
boring locations and provide estimates of the bedrock surface elevation and general condition
of the bedrock surface. We estimate the cost of the engineering services at $1,000. This fee
also includes coordinating the Gopher State One Call utility clearing service.
Bolton&Menk,Inc.
Cost Estimate BODX-00-P045
June 30,2000
Page 3
One original and one copy of our final report will be submitted to you unless we are directed to
do otherwise.
Utility Clearance
Braun Intertec will contact Gopher State One Call and request they contact the area public
utilities for clearing the underground public utilities. We request you notify Braun Intertec
immediately of the presence and location of any underground private utilities on the property
which are not the responsibility of public utilities. Braun Intertec will take reasonable
precautions to avoid underground objects. In authorizing this contract, you agree to waive any
claims against Braun Intertec and will indemnify and hold Braun Intertec harmless for any
claims or liability due to the injury or Ioss allegedly arising from our damaging of underground
objects that were not called to our attention prior tothe beginning of work.
Bolton&Menk,Inc.
Cost Estimate BODX-00-PO45
June 30,2000
Page 4
Signature Page
Re: Cost Estimate for Bedrock Depth Evaluation,Proposed General Sieben Drive
Connections to County Road 46,Hastings,Minnesota
Braun Intertec appreciates the opportunity to present this cost estimate. It is being presented in
duplicate so, if acceptable after your review, one copy may be retained for your records and
one copy may be signed and returned by U.S. mail or fared in its entirety, including the
General Conditions, to us as authorization to proceed. We will begin the project, in
accordance with our schedule, upon receipt of your authorization.
The estimated cost of$4,050 presented in this cost estimate is based on the scope of services
- described and the assumption that the cost estimate will be ?uthorizPfl -Oebir 30 ciayc and that
the project will be completed within the proposed schedule. If the project is not authorized
within 30 days, we may need to modify the cost estimate. If the project cannot be completed
within the proposed schedule due to circumstances beyond our control, revising the cost
estimate may be required for completion of the remaining tasks.
Payment for services is due upon receipt of invoice, with interest added to unpaid balances
after 30 days, in accordance with the attached General Conditions which are part of this cost
estimate.
Authorization to Proceed:
Please proceed according to the described scope of services and General Conditions:
Date
Client Name
Authorized Signature
Title
j ms:rlb\proposals\OOp045
BETTENDORF ROHRER KNOCHE WALL N
APPRAISALS VALUATION SERVICES
July 14, 2000
Mr. Thomas M. Montgomery, P.E.
Public Works Director
City of Hastings — -----
101 4th Street East
Hastings, MN 55033-1955
RE: Fee Proposal for Appraisal Services
General Sieben Drive Extension Alternatives
Right of Way Acquisition and Benefits Analysis
Dear Mr. Montgomery:
I am writing to present a proposal for providing appraisal services regarding the above
referenced city project in response to your letter of 6/29/00. I understand that the
purpose of the appraisal services will be as follows: 1) to estimate the cost of the right
of way acquisition for each of the two General Sieben Drive extension options south to
County Road 48; and 2) to prepare a benefits analysis for each of the two options to
estimate how much of the project costs can be supported by assessments to the
benefiting property owners (Wallin and Bauer).,Both of-these analyses will require the
before and after valuation methodology to properly measure the It/W acquisition cost
(damages to the owners), and benefits to the owners from the proposed public
improvement project.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide for your consideration this appraisal fee
proposal. Bettendorf Rohrer Knoche Wall;Inc. (BRKW Appraisals) is a full service
real estate appraisal company founded in 1991 and located in the Midway area of St.
Paul. We offer expertise in the appraisal of real estate including commercial,
industrial, multi-family residential, single family residential, vacant land, and special
purpose properties. Additionally, one of my partners has expertise in the appraisal of
machinery and equipment items. BRKW Appraisals has a total of seven appraisers,
three of whom have the MAI designation of the appraisal institute..
SPRUCE TREE CENTRE SUITE 314
1600 UNIVERSITY AVE ST PAUL MN 55104
651.646.6114 FAX 651 646.8086 6rkw@brkw.com
-Page 2-
The Wallin property consists of two parcels - one in Hastings north of the Vermillion
River with a preliminary plat, and one in Nininger Township south of the river with no
immediate development plans. The Bauer property consists of one large parcel in
Nininger Township with no immediate development plans. The approximate fees, with
a 10% +/- adjustment allowance, for my firm to prepare complete appraisals, self-
contained appraisal reports (4 reports total), would be as follows:
Wallin Property
R/W Acquisition: $5,000
Benefits Analysis: $5,000
Bauer Property
R/W Acquisition: $4,000
Benefits Analysis: $4,000
__. Approximate Total Fees: 518,000
The reports should be completed by about mid-October, based on my current work
schedule, which includes another benefits analysis for Hastings. To be formally
engaged to perform the appraisals, please sign one copy of this letter and return it to
me, or you may issue an engagement letter under your own letterhead indicating your
acceptance of this proposal.
Please contact me at your convenience if you have questions or should require any
additional information.
Sincerely,
BETTENDORF ROHRER KNOCHE WALL, INC.
Marc E. Knoche, MAI
Principal
I (we) accept the terms of this fee proposal for the appraisal services to be provided
by BRKW Appraisals on the real estate described herein.
(Signature)
(Date)
VIII-B-1
Memo
To: Mayor Werner and City Council
From: Matthew Weiland, City Planner
Subject: Minor Subdivision 295 Crestview Drive
Date: August 3rd, 2000
CC: Arthur Kruger,Teresa Kruger
Arthur Kruger has submitted an application and a request for a minor subdivision ofproperty located
at 295 Crestview Drive, which is owned by Teresa Kruger, the applicant's daughter. He is
requesting the minor subdivision in order to subdivide an existing lot into two separate lots.Attached
with this memo are copies of a site map,the land use application,and a copy of the proposed survey.
Background Information:
Existing Conditions: The existing lot currently has a single family home.
Proposed Conditions:The property owner is proposing to split the lot into two separate parcels. See
the attached survey for the proposed lot configurations.
Minor Subdivision Criteria:A minor subdivision is a waiver of the platting requirement in the City.
It is allowed for property which will not be subdivided into no more than three lots and these shall
not necessitate any additional public investment. The property in question currently is served by an
existing road and the lots are serviced by City Sewer and Water.
Property Location: The subject property is located at 295 Crestview Drive
Comprehensive Plan Classification: This property is guided U-II Urban Residential. The proposed
use is consistent with this plan classification.
Site Zoning: The subject property is zoned R-3 Medium-High Density Residence. The minimum
lot size is 5000 sq ft. After the subdivision, Parcel A would have 22,352 square feet and Parcel B
would have 17,142 square feet.
Planning Commission
Page 2
June 13,2000
Proposed Public Improvements: There are no public improvements as a part of this project.
Trees: The developer shall plant one"boulevard"tree and one front yard tree per lot. These trees
shall be at least two inches in diameter at the base and the species of the tree should be on the list
of approved trees Created by the city Forester. This requirement is consistent with what the city has
been requiring in other areas.
Subdivision Fees: The applicant would have to pay an $850.00 park dedication fee and a $305.00 sewer
interceptor fee for the creation of the new lot.
Planning Consideration: The applicant has submitted a survey showing a new lot split which
illustrates a 50 ft width at setback on Parcel B and a 51.4 ft width at building setback for Parcel A.
City staff would define the width at setback for parcel A to be 49 ft. City staff interprets the width
at setback is determined at the front yard setback line.
This property is zoned R-3 PRD . Generally R-2 zoning standards are used for single family home
lots in the R-3 PRD zoning district. This was not made a condition of approval for this subdivision
and was not agreed to in the development agreement. The development agreement simply states that
this subdivision is zoned R-3 PRD and shall adhere to those district standards. The City Council
may establish minimum setbacks at width for lots in the R-3 PRD district during site plan review or
lot review in this case, since minium setback at width was not established. Approving the minor
subdivision would approve this width at setback for this lot. The City Council is under no
requirement to authorize this minor subdivision.The concerns of the neighbors should be addressed.
This would be a narrow lot,but no more narrow than the other lot created with a home already built
on it. The applicant has indicated that he will build a high quality home on this lot. . A new home
on this lot would have to meet all the other zoning setbacks for the district including side yard
setbacks.
Applicant's Action Requested:
A motion to recommend approval to the City Council of the minor subdivision subject to the following
conditions:
1. Approval of a resolution waving platting requirements.
2. The resolution waving platting requirements and a certificate of survey shall be recorded
with the County. A copy of the certificate of survey shall also be filed with the City.
3. The applicant shall pay $850.00 in park dedication fees.
4. The applicant shall pay$305.00 in sewer interceptor fees.
5. The developer shall plant one"boulevard"tree and one front yard tree per lot. These trees
shall be at least two inches in diameter at the base and the species of the tree should be on the
Planning Commission
Page 3
June 13,2000
list of approved trees created by the City Forester.This requirement is consistent with what
the city has been requiring in other areas.
cc: Arthur Kruger
LAND USE APPLICATION
CITY OF HASTINGS
101 4th Street East,Hastings, MN 55033
Phone(651)437.4127 Fax(651)427.7082
Address of Property Involved: A 1 r — e K e—s f V t W
Legal Description of Property Involved: '71,,sc FhkTry of- 1„4- $ a,,�_ 9
3L0 c K 2, w
Applicant: 'f// Official Use Only
Name 4tfkur- M. i�V_"te.. DateRec'd
Address _I b,o 3 �& +^rr-I— 54-- File No.
AjwAlSso33 Fee
Phone �_ q_ StS0�1 _ Rec'dby
Ordinance#
Section
Owner(If different from Applicant):
Name T a es n 14 ru.y EP,
Address 2cts- CCres,�-u?ew
14-tFe-7-.'AJ s MA) So S�s
Phone 451- 137 .- R.8 o
Request: Special Use:
Rezone: Subdivision: lea,00
Comp Plan Amend: Vacation:
Site Plan: Other:
Variance: TOTAL:
Description of Request (include site plan, survey, and/or plat if applicable):
$ems �jwrvcy�� 'I�L�r
y
Signature of Applic Date
C4 b 11i I
Signature of Owner Date
Arthur and Marie Kruger
1603 Forest Street
Hastings, MN 55033
June 7, 2000
Hastings Planning Commission
Hastings City Hall
Hastings, MN 55033
Dear Members:
We are requesting an approval of a variance of 1.12 feet for a Minor Subdivision of
Lot 8 and 9 Block 2 Williams First Addition located on Crestview Drive in Hastings,
Minnesota.See Drawing #2000-046 for location and area in question.
The variance is necessary to meet the required 50' at the 25' set back line. As the
drawing indicates, the set back at 25' is 48.88 feet, or short 1.12 feet. This would yield
a lot containing 17,142 square feet.
If approved I plan on erecting a one story home which would be an asset to the area.
This also would allow my wife and myself to reside next to my daughter in our later
stages of our life.
Respectfully submitted,
Arthur Kruger and Marie Kruger
f-
/ P
ftda= A -
,t
abose parte of Lots 0 and 9, Blo-k 2'a R2LLIAMB FIRST Ap Moy, an file nod of
bsvosd is the office of the County Recorder, Dekuta County, Minnesota,
/yil"y." ` i fn - dpseri3Wd as follm
BagLming at the soot southerly[order of said Lot 8; than-- B66''Ss'17'B,
essweed, "nag the sen,heasterly line of sedd Lot 8 a distance of
dd 8` sp • ee Of .21 feet; thenaa
dC'LO / A psrsllsl vita; Chs wuiheaslatly lin of manta-w of 217.33 Eset
O'1b
to the aasterky line or said lot 2, thaA¢a 300'06.15'3, along the east line of
said Leta 8 and 9, a di.tanve or 11e..12 -sat, tAeene 870'10.00'M . distance of
253.90 Vent to the aouthaeateely Ltne or esi8 Lot 9; thence ucrtbaraterly.,
.2,MV mid 9I uthws't, havlmv�g a r"Ine of Z53.use at 20 feet.• °o a noatual ntial4099446 ouzo-, eoucava to the
X161 "F' I ging sof MZ'Pgb'i2'%, a ddatance of 42.30 foot to tAa point t begot in. a chore
heginniari.
k 90
a��_ `� 9 ,q •A, c 10 I O sdajectt no 2wa2weta square e
ef fact, of lass.
� t o \ ° 57
That part Of Lot 9, alpot 2, a2ZLZAa6 v RST-ADumxOB, os file and of p,anta in
tbe€ w r bko County l � D � tya iyia9nonthari9 of
tan o lin
°.i \ 1 / Ceo•enCisJ at tRe'pant nwffierSY corner Of Lot a Of Mid Block 2; thence
\ ; • 1 ig0 i�1T8, bearlog sseuSed, eioag tlu •••°ih•a•tarly line Of said Lot 8, a
,D dieteauoe Of 12.67€anti'fb'-e IN 6 V6'8 a distance of 76.20"East, ttanua
"m E40480I RF9 57"li'8, parailal-*W Ow,uuwbmpl�#y a-* of "Ad Lnt a., a-dfataaw of
YS*7:37.yliet tb stW: aY 140'�ffwit 1a 'bbaade BO0'06'•15'•E. ajang the
sa/t lila of said ion, a aid 9..a#9}tigae of 114 11 feet to the point of
AMgloniaq of toe 11oe to ya:deapailn"i 3Hi4yva S76*%V'08�8 a dLetance of 253..90
270 PLAT .Deet be iris Pen"nes0etW Lisa.Of Said not 9 and theca teratnetinq.
1 4'd 1 23020 NFAS.,GYW I Oontaa'kalue M142 sgeans cuiw. sera ar Mese_
SBY22 I subject to wsseents of revdcd.
` IR8C5rp7Di DHAflpCiPII3
I
1JffVVY $$f ✓INC.
w o 30 w w Ert Bus:(651)= c(a31}.�Ai979
N _
o DENOTES 1/2' IRON PIPE SET, MARKED
BY R.LS. 9294.
a DENOTES FOUND IRON PIPE.
BEARING SYSTEM IS ASSUMED.
'tasty way me uavoq.aa.aEapagvra MINOR LOT SUBDIVISR
p,a.AlgrieLrx�tdela„+akrLo9lnh�maoGmol
IatasiA9a/BhbcMltaAaop:aWvib,lws:p SCALE: 1"=3D' DRAWN
DATE:5/23/001 REVISED'.
ARTHUR KRUGER
DRAWING
HASTINGS, MN. 2000-
295 Crestview
Drive
• Proposed
Lot Split
400
� ,� }•''`: Hvenba on the MissisniPDi
X d
"RE ,
D i
T� ..F. `/A'/
Buildings
Roads
a ,
Structures
#�� ce n�� `� Water
�M
Q Limits
W�E
--- 5
it
Q-
Site Location
This is not a survey
vill-s-2
Memo
To: Mayor Werner and City Council
From: Matthew Weiland,City Planner
Subject: Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW-Barton Sand and Gravel Pit) -EIS
Decision and Findings of Fact
Date: August 3d, 2000
CC: Tiller Uorporation
Background Information
Barton Sand and Gravel submitted a discretionary EAW at the request of City staff to clarify
their existing and future mining operations in the City of Hastings and the adjoining township.
The City issued an initial special use permit to Davies Excavating in early 1984 with several
conditions attached. In 1988 the soil processing permit for the operation was transferred from
Davies Excavating to Barton Sand and Gravel. The City has issued Barton Sand and gravel a
special use permit every year to date for the mining operation. An environmental review was
never completed for the whole mining area which has expanded since the original application in
1984 The City Council ordered a discretionary EAW to be prepared for this project,based on
their findings of fact that this project may have significant environmental impacts. The City
Council voted to release the EAW for distribution at their June 5th, 2000 City Council Meeting.
Pursuant to MEQB Number 4410.4300 Subpart 19A an Environmental Assessment Worksheet
was prepared and submitted to appropriate agencies and the public, and has passed through the
30 day comment period. A few comments were received and will be addressed as part of the
Record of Decision.
EAW Process
The purpose of the EAW is to rapidly assess the environmental effects which may be associated
with the proposed project which will then serve as an aid in determining wether or not a an EIS
(Environmental Impact Statement) is required. City staff has worked with the developer to
prepare the EAW and have verified the accuracy of the information provided by the applicant.
The City Council is required to authorize the publication and distribution of the EAW to the
required parties on the distribution list as determined by the Environmental Quality Board
(EQB). A notice of the EAW will also be placed in the local paper and published in the EQB
Monitor. After the EAW is released for distribution, there is a 30 day comment period in which
EAW-Holst Pit
Page 2
the governmental agencies and citizens may comment on the accuracy of the EAW and ask for
more information. After the 30 day comment period, the City Council will formally vote to
determine if an EIS is needed or not.
Comments
Copies of the EAW were mailed out to the required agencies and also made available to the
General Public. Six written comments were received(letters attached).
EIS Decision Process
The standard for the decision is : Does the project have the"potential for significant
environmental effects?" In answering the question the City must compare the impacts which
may be reasonably expected to occur from the project with the following criteria:
1. Type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects
2. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects;
3. The extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by
ongoing public regulatory authority; and
4. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and
controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public
agencies or the project proposer, or of EIS's previously prepared.
Purpose of EIS if ordered-Th purpose of the EIS is to provide information for
governmental units, the proposers of the project , and other persons to evaluate
proposed projects which have the potential for significant environmental effects,
to consider alternatives to the proposed project, and to explore methods for
reducing adverse environmental effects.
Conclusion
This property was recently farmed and is now being mined with a sand and gravel operation.
There are many natural features on the property. The property includes flood plains, shorelands,
wetlands and is in the MI,4 A Critical Area. The use of the property as a gravel operation is an
appropriate use for the site as the reclamation of the property will leave it as a natural area with
more wetland habitat. Mining operations do have environmental impacts,but they also have a
limited life spanThere is a community need for sand and gravel and there are less opportunities
to site these operations appropriately as the area becomes more urbanized.
The City has adopted many local ordinances to protect its natural features and amenities. These
ordinances include a floodplain ordinance, a shoreland ordinance, and a Critical Areas Ordinance
EAW-Holst Pit
Page 3
(in process of being approved/Executive Order 79-19 enforced in the interim). The City will
address and mitigate where feasible the environmental impacts of this mining operation through
it's Special Use Permit process. This special use permit is reviewed yearly.
Based on the information developed during the preparation of the EAW and the correspondence
received during the EAW comment period, it is felt that although there are various concerns
associated with the development, it would appear that the preparation of an EIS is not warranted.
The environmental issues and concerns raised through the EAW process can be addressed as part
of the local permitting process for the mining operation.
Requested Action:
Motion to recommend approval'of the attached record of decision and resolution
determining a negative declaration on the need for an EIS to be completed for the new
Barton Sand and Gravel Pit.
�NN�r1
Minnesota Department of Transportation
Metropolitan Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
June 28,2000
Mr.Matt Weiland
City Planner
City of Hastings
101 4t'Street East
Hastings,Minnesota 55033
Subject: Tiller Corporation Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW)
De-sr Mr.Weiland:
The Minnesota Department of Transportation(Mn/DOT)has reviewed the above-referenced EAW and
has no comments, as this development does not directly impact state highway right of way.
Thank you for submitting this EAW to our agency. Please address all future correspondence for
development activity such as plats, site plans, environmental reviews, and comprehensive plan
amendments to:
Sherry Narusiewicz
Mn/DOT-Metro Division
Waters Edge
1500 West County Road B-2
Roseville,Minnesota 55113
Please note that Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three(3) complete copies of plats and
two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a
plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay
Mn/DOT's review and response to development proposals. We appreciate your anticipated
cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay
and/or return incomplete submittals.
Feel free to call(651-582-1771)if you should have any questions.
Sincerely,
PauWICkzech 1
Senior Transportation Planner/Local Government Liaison
Copy: Mn/DOT Division File—Control Section:N/A
Mn/DOT LGL File—Hastings
An equal opportunity employer
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE
July 14, 2000
City of Hastings
Attn: Matt Weiland
101 a Street East
Hastings, MN 55033
RE: EAW: Tiller Corporation—Hastings/Ravenna Township Sand &Gravel Mining Operation
Dakota County
SHPO Number: 2000-0136
Dear Mr. Weiland:
Thank you for providing this office with a copy of the EAW for the above-referenced project. It has
been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given to the Minnesota Historical Society by the
Minnesota Historic Sites Act and the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and through the process
outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.1600.
The response to question 25a indicates that there are recorded archaeological properties in the
project area. Because this area has good probability of containing unrecorded sites, we recommend
that an archaeological survey of the project parcel be completed as part of the planning process.
Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800, Procedures of the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation for the protection of historic properties. If this project is considered for federal
assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, it should be submitted to our office with reference
to the assisting federal agency.
Please contact Dennis Gimmestad at (651) 296-5462 if you have any questions regarding our
review of this project.
Sincerely,
Britta L. Bloomberg
Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer
315 KrA,i3O(;(; BOULEVARD vWEST/SAINT 13, UL,MINNESOTA 5:)702-1906/TEI,EI'1iONL:651-29 0-6126
QSMgNT OF Tye'
s$ United States Department of the Interior
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
�4ACH 9 A Mississippi National River and Recreation Area
1N REPLY REFER TO:
111 E. Kellogg Blvd.
St. Paul,Minnesota 55101-1256
L8011(MISS)-3
August 2, 2000
Matthew Weiland
City of Hastings
Hastings, MN 55033-1955
Dear Mr. Weiland:
This letter is in regard to the EAW prepared for Tiller Corporation for the sand and gravel
mining operation in the City of Hastings and Ravenna Township. The project is within
the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area(MNRRA), a unit of the National
Park System. Congress established the MNRRA in 1988 to protect and enhance the
nationally significant historical, recreational, scenic, cultural, natural, economic, and
scientific resources of the river corridor. The boundary of.the MNRRA coincides with
the boundary for the state designated Mississippi River Critical Area as defined in
Minnesota Executive Order 79-19.
The MNRRA and Critical Area designations for the project area should be noted under
questions 14 and 25 of the EAW, as water-related land use management areas and
designated recreation area. The National Park Service has no regulatory authority on
lands not owned by the NPS in the MNRRA. However, the MNRRA Comprehensive
Management Plan, adopted in 1995, incorporates by reference requirements of the state
Mississippi River Critical Area Program, and contains additional voluntary resource
protection policies. Compatibility of the project with state Critical Area requirements
should be discussed in the response to question 27. For more information on Critical
Area requirements, please contact the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Critical Area hydrologist Sandy Fecht at 651-297-2401. We also encourage the city to
conform with the voluntary MNRRA site development policies, where possible.
We offer the following additional comment:
• We would recommend that natural vegetation be restored during the reclamation
process in the areas that would be affected by the proposed mining in order to control
erosion and surface water runoff after mining has ceased.
We believe that the EAW adequately addresses the major impacts of the project on the
area and there is no need for an EIS. If you have any questions regarding these
comments,please contact Daniel Ehrke of our office at 651-290-3030, x235.
Sincerely,
JoAnn A Kyral
Superintendent
Metropolitan Council
Working for the Region, Planning for the Future
July 19, 2000
Matthew Weiland
City Planner
City of Hastings
101 4`h Street East
Hastings,MN 55033
RE: Tiller Corporation—Hastings/Ravenna Township Sand and Gravel Mining Operation
Metropolitan Council District 16
Referral File No. 18292-1
-Dear`Mr,Weiland: ......
_.
Metropolitan Council staff have reviewed this environmental assessment worksheet(EAW)to
determine its adequacy and accuracy in addressing regional concerns,potential impacts that
warrant further investigation,and the need for an environmental impact statement. The project
proposes continuation of an existing,previously permitted mining operation in the city of
Hastings and Ravenna Township and revising permit conditions to remove restrictions on how
mining is conducted below the water table within Ravenna Township.
The proposed project involves an existing mining operation that has been in existence since the
1930's or 1940's. The entire site encompasses approximately 203 acres. The portion of the site
lying within Ravenna Township consists of 55.35 acres that has been permitted by Dakota
County since 1989. The portion of the site that lies within the City of Hastings is 147.60 acres
and has been permitted since 1984. Approximately 95 acres of the Hastings segment and 13.40
acres lying within Ravenna Township have been previously approved to be mined.
The Council is aware of the rapid depletion of aggregate resources through urbanization, and has
expressed the need to ensure that the resources be utilized in an orderly manner prior to
urbanization as a way of promoting smart, economic growth. Staff submits the following
technical comments:
Karen Jensen,Planner,Environmental Services,651/602-1401
Item 10: Cover Types
The table estimated cover types and areas before and after development is confusing. The"after
development"cover types does not include a listing for mining and processing.
Kristina Smitten,River Corridor Planner,Community Development,651/602-1535
The entire site is within the state Critical Area and federal Mississippi National River and
Recreation Area designated boundaries. As defined by Executive Order 79-19,the designation of
the Mississippi River Corridor as a Critical Area means that standards and guidelines are required
to be followed by state and regional agencies for permit regulation. According to Executive
Order 79-19 mining and extraction uses shall be appropriately screened from view of the river by
natural screen devices and existing and future extractive uses shall be required to submit land
reclamation plans. Revegetated land reclamation efforts should be with species native to the area.
AREA CODE CHANGES TO 651 IN JULY, 1998
230 East Fifth Street St.Paul.Minnesota 55101-1626 (612)602-1000 Fax 602-1550 TDD/nY 291-0904 1 Metro Info Line 602-1888
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Matthew Weiland
July 17,2000
Page 2
Except as noted above, staff concludes that the EAW is complete and an EIS is not needed with
respect to regional concerns. If you have general questions,please contact the review
coordinator,Kristina Smitten,at 651/602-1535,or contact staff as noted above regarding specific
areas of enquiry.
Sincerely,
Helen A.Boyer
Director, Enviro ental Services
cc: John Conzemius,Metropolitan Council District 16
L'it Coopci,Dlrectu, !vIC- D,r 141intng,dud Glu W a,iviaiiagoinent Dept.
Keith Buttleman,Director,MCES,Environmental Planning and Evaluation Dept.
Richard Thompson, Supervisor, Comprehensive Planning
Karen Jensen,Environmental Services
Kristina Smitten, Comprehensive Planning
y�P,��OF MINA/FSOrq
0
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
a
W
�oJ 500 Lafayette Road 10
�PrC St. Paul,N9innesota 55155-40
OFNANpP --
July 11,2000
Matthew Weiland, City Planner
101 4" Street East
Hastings,MN 55033
RE: Tiller Corporation-Hastings/Ravenna Township Sand&Gravel Mining
Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW)
Dear Mr. Weiland:
The Department of Natural Resources(DNR)has reviewed the EAW for the Tiller Corporation
Hastings/Ravenna Township Sand&Gravel Mining project. We offer the following comments for your
consideration.
Item 14,Water-related Land Use Management District, should be answered "yes"because the site is
located within the state-designated Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area and within the Mississippi
National River and Recreation Area(MNRRA). The Critical Area was designated in 1976 and MNRRA
was designated in 1988. The purposes of designating the Mississippi River as a state critical area include:
1)protecting and preserving a unique and valuable state and regional resource for the benefit of the
health, safety, and welfare of the citizens for the state,region, and nation; 2)preventing and mitigating
irreversible damage to this resource; 3)preserving and enhancing its natural,aesthetic, cultural, and
historical value for public use; and 4)protecting and preserving the biological and ecological functions of
the corridor.
This site is within a Critical Area district classified as Rural Open Space District,where the lands and
waters shall be used and developed to preserve their open, scenic,and natural characteristics, and
ecological and economic functions.
Local governments are required to incorporate the standards and guidelines of Executive Order 79-19
into local plans and ordinances. Local units of government and regional and state agencies shall permit
development in the corridor only in accordance with those adopted plans and regulations. In addition to
the Rural Open Space District guidelines,applicable required state standards for this project include:
• protection of wetlands;
• protection of bluffs greater than 18%, and conditions for development of bluffs between 12 and
18% slopes; bluffs include all slopes greater than 18%throughout the Corridor; more than one
bluffline may be encountered proceeding landward from the water;
• minimization of runoff and improvement of quality of runoff;
• minimization of site alteration;
DNR Information: 651-296-6157 9 1-888-646-61367 9 TTY: 651-296-5484 • 1-800-657-3929
An Equal Opportunity EmployerPrinted on Recycled Paper Containing a
Who Values Diversity %41) Minimum of 10%Post-Consumer Waste
Matthew Weiland, City Planner
July 11,2000
• site plan review and approval only if minimization of adverse effects;
• conditions for buffering, landscaping, and revegetation;
• ensure that bluffs remain in their natural state;
• retention of existing vegetation; and
• minimization of potential mining and extraction impacts at affected sites; land reclamation and
reforestation for the mining site shall be regulated.
DNR can provide additional information on issues of Critical Area compliance if desired; please contact
Sandy Fecht, Critical Area Hydrologist, at(651)297-2401.
Item 6,Project Description, indicates that the mining limits for Ravenna Township have been revised to
provide a larger setback from the Vermillion River,wooded areas, and wetlands. We recommend
consideration of similar revisions for an increased setback from the Vermillion River for Phases II and III
planned for the northwestern part of the site.
The Permits and Approvals section of the EAW in Item 8 correctly notes that a DNR water appropriation
permit is in place for the project. We recommend consultation with Pat Lynch,DNR Area Hydrologist, at
(651)772-7910 to assure that the unified project does not require a permit amendment.
The description of fish and wildlife resources in Item l la is inadequate. The EAW should indicate that
the Vermillion River contains significant fishery resources, especially in the spring when fish use the
river for spawning. The river contains a high quality walleye fishery,and the state-record black crappie
was taken from the Vermillion River downstream of the project site. Regarding wildlife resources,the
EAW's assertion that"[t]he river valley is a host to a variety of wildlife" is too vague to provide useful
information. The EAW should minimally describe the valley habitat and offer a listing of species likely
to be present. Also, the project results in a 20%reduction in wooded areas that will not be offsetby
creation of wetlands;w en considered in the context o all other development,this_oss is a cumulative
pact that should be acknowledged.
The EAW correctly identifies the presence of significant floodplain forest at the site in Item l lb. In
reality,the area represents the largest block of contiguous floodplain forest in Dakota County; much of
this forest is in state ownership. As such,the project's avoidance of activity in this area is proper.
Item 27,Compatibility with Plans and Land Use Regulations,correctly notes that this project is subject to
the City of Hastings and Ravenna Township Zoning Ordinances. Ravenna Township's Ordinance
requires that no nonconforming use shall be expanded or enlarged except in conformity with the
provisions of this Ordinance. It is our understanding that for compliance with the approved Ravenna
Township Ordinance to be in place, it must be ensured that the use is not expanded or enlarged beyond
the permit that was in effect on June 10, 1999.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. We look forward to receiving your record of
decision and responses to comments at the conclusion of the environmental review. Minnesota Rules part
4410.1700, subparts 4& 5,require you to send us your Record of Decision within five days of deciding
2
Matthew Weiland,City Planner
July 11, 2000
this action. Please contact Bill Johnson of my staff at(651)296-9229 if you have questions about this
letter.
Sincerely,
Thomas W.Balcom, Supervisor
Environmental Planning&Review Section
Office of Management and Budget Services
c: Kathleen Wallace
Con Christianson
Joe Oschwald
iviaryanna Harstad
Sandy Fecht,Critical Area Hydrologist
Pat Lynch,Area Hydrologist
Jon Nelson
Russ Peterson,USFWS
Jon Larsen,EQB
420000238-0002
RAVENNAMPD
3
C O U N T Y
W
Office of Planning July 12, 2000
Lynn Moratzka,AICP
Director
Dakota County Matthew Weiland, City Planner
Western Service Center City of Hastings
14955 Galaxie Avenue
AppleValley,MN 55124 101 Fourth Street East
Hastings, MN 55033
612.891.7030
Fax 612.891.7031 RE: Tiller Corporation Sand &Gravel Mining EAW
w .co.dakota.mn.us
Dear Mr.Weiland:
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this proposal. Our comments follow the
order of items in the EAW. We hope that you will find our comments to be helpful.
Page 7, Number 8: Permits and Aoprovals Required.
The EAW should acknowledge the fact that two other required approvals will be needed. One is a
well sealing permit from Dakota County and the second is registration of the concrete and asphalt
processing operation with Dakota County.
Page 7, Number 10: Cover Types.
All but one of the cover types listed has different before and after totals. The EAW states that if
before and after totals are not equal, an explanation is required. The text prior to the listing of the
cover types states that the numbers reflect existing and final conditions. The EAW should provide
a detailed explanation of the before and after cover types.
Page 9. Number 13,Water Use.
Abandonment of the one well on-site also needs to follow the requirements of Dakota County
Ordinance No. 114.
Page 12, Number 19, Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions.
The last sentence on the page states that`The Jordan Sandstone forms the subcrop in the western
most portion of the site". This should be revised to add"and southeastern"after"western".
Page 15, Number 21: Traffic.
No significant changes in traffic conditions are shown. The existing access to CR 54 appears to be
continued. If new accesses west of the existing access point are petitioned for at some time in the
future or a change in an existing access is proposed,this would require a permit from the County.
Access guidelines require at least 1/8 mile (660 feet) between driveways. The frontage on CR 54
appears to be over 3,000 feet.
Paae 18, Number 27: Compatibility with plans and land use regulations.
The EAW does not mention the fact that the site is in the state-enacted Mississippi River Critical
Area and the federal-enacted Mississippi National River and Recreation Area (MNRRA).
0
WnMed an recycled paper
rth 30 port-consumer wane.
AN EQl OW Ri NR E LOTER
The applicable state agency is the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and the applicable
policy-planning-zoning guidelines are contained in Executive Order 79-19 [3 State register 1692-1697].
The applicable federal agency is the National Park Service, and the applicable goals and policies are
contained in the MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan. Dakota County adopted a Critical Area
Plan in 1999. County authority in the Critical Area is limited to the shoreland and floodplain areas in
Nininger and Ravenna Townships and to County-owned lands in the river corridor. Ravenna Township
has an updated Critical Area Plan and zoning, which would apply this site.
Part B of Executive Order 79-19 establishes corridor districts and guidelines. The mining operation area
in the City of Hastings is located in the"Urban Diversified District";the remainder of the site in Ravenna
Township is in the"Rural Open Space District".
Part C of the Executive Order contains specific standards and guidelines for local units of government for
preparing plans and regulations. Item C.2.a addresses site plans.
The EAW should describe how the proposed project meets the applicable requirements of Executive
Order 79-19 and the MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan.
7_Pne 18, Number Other Potential Environmental Impacts.
Part of the area has been used for sand and gravel mining in the past (e.g., Davies Excavating), but little
or no meaningful reclamation has occurred subsequent to each past use. The following comments focus
only on known and potential environmental and public health and safety impacts not addressed or
inadequately addressed in the EAW by the City of Hastings, and Tiller Corporation's consultant, Sunde
Engineering.
(a) Hastings—Glendale Road Dump
The Hastings—Glendale Road Dump (Site#7057) is a former Superfund (CERCLA and MERLA) site
located 3500 feet south of the proposed site. Although the dumpsite has been taken off the Superfund
list, contaminants released from the dump are still present in the shallow groundwater aquifer. The
contaminant plume is characterized by a number of chlorinated VOCs (volatile organic compounds),
especially TCE or 1,1,2-trichloroethene, as well as heavy metals. The plume has migrated north and
impacted several private residential wells along Glendale Road and Ravenna Trail, near the site.
Some wells were replaced by the residents, but the contaminant plume was not remediated (e.g., pump
and treat). Instead, a cap was placed over the dump to prevent the infiltration of precipitation and the
further leaching of the soluble contaminants in the dump. However, it appears that the cap may have
been compromised by erosion from stormwater runoff and municipal operations (e.g., an access road,
yard waste compost site, and law enforcement shooting range). Because the monitoring wells have been
sealed and the remaining private wells are no longer being tested, the status of the wells in this area is
unknown.
The mining operation proposed will significantly dewater the shallow aquifer, to allow the extraction of the
sand and gravel. Dewatering will also lower groundwater levels in the vicinity, especially south of the site,
due to the south-to-north groundwater flow gradient. For those residential wells completed in the shallow
aquifer and located near the intersection of Glendalta Road and Ravenna Trail,the static water levels will
be lowered (especially during droughts), and the contaminant plume may be further captured and
entrained towards the mining operation's pump-out wells. It is also possible, depending upon well
construction and operational parameters, that deeper wells screened lower in the same aquifer or the first
bedrock(variably the Prairie du Chien-Jordan aquifer or deeper) may be impacted.The proposer has not
addressed any of the above impacts or issues in the EAW.
(b) Davies Excavating Dump L)c0)
The Davies Excavating Dump (Site#7059) is located in several places within the existing sand and gravel
mine now owned by Tiller Corporation, the proposer. The dump consists primarily of public works
demolition debris (concrete, rebar, and asphalt wastes) and wastes generated from the mining operation
(vehicle and mechanical wastes and other refuse). These waste disposals should be removed from the
Tiller Corporation property and either recycled or disposed of in a permitted, licensed landfill. This
includes wastes that have been buried, smeared and covered, or released (e.g., waste oils, lubricants,
and fuels). Tiller Corporation should ensure that no similar prohibited disposals or releases occur,
especially since licensing for waste concrete and asphalt recycling is required by Dakota County.
(c) Other Waste Disposal and Contaminant Release Sites
There several other waste disposal and contaminant release sites in the immediate vicinity that may have
potential impacts on the proposed mining operation.
The Soo Line Fuel Spill (Site#7060) was caused by a train derailment in the late 1980s, and diesel fuel
was spilled in the railroad's right-of-way and adjacent drainageways in the north center of section 36,
which is near the southeast extent of the proposed mining operation. Although diesel fuel contaminated
soil and surface water were excavated and treated (absorbent pads), some residual diesel fuel remained.
No subsequent monitoring was required, but diesel range organic chemicals and their degraded products
may be present in the immediate area.
Also, a small, unnamed dump (Site#7078) is located north of Ravenna Trail on property that appears to
have been purchased by the Tiller Corporation. This dump should be resolved in accordance with County
Ordinance No. 11 u, in a manner simiiar to ine Davies Excavating dump (Site#7059) described above.
(d) Sedimentation Impacts
The mining operation will generate significant quantities of fine to medium-sized sediments, in addition to
overburden stockpiles. The EAW should describe the operational and engineering controls that will be in
place to effectively minimize discharge, erosion, and other impacts to the Vermillion River and floodplain
wetlands.
In conclusion,thank you again for the opportunity to comment on this EAW. Should you have any
questions about our comments, please contact me at 952-891-7030.
Sincerely,
Kurt Chatfield
Principal Planner
Office of Planning
cc: Commissioner Joseph Harris, District 1
Brandt Richardson, County Administrator
Susan L. Hoyt, Director, Physical Development Division
Lynn Moratzka, Director Office of Planning
Don Theisen, County Engineer
Barry Schade, Director, Environmental Management Department
Robert Overby, Physical Development Planner
Tom Berry, County Zoning Administrator
Record of Decision
Barton Sand and Gravel Pit
Hastings,MN
A Discretionary EAW was prepared and sent to the distribution list as required by the Environmental
Quality Board(EQB)Rules. Notice of the EAW was published in the EQB Monitor and in the local
newspaper. The thirty day comment period ended on July 12`h,2000.
The EAW and issues raised during the comment period have been reviewed. It is the decision of the
City Council that an EIS is not necessary. The Hastings City Council acknowledges the issues raised
and has responded to each issue.The potential environmental impacts have been discussed. Permit
requests and approvals will be obtained prior to construction.
`� Ilii-comment letters are briefly descri�„u below. yn r . -zU;
.x.���sues ia,�e �:- A s ., ��� �f�.,� ,on....;..�� -
is provided in a numbered list beginning with the first issue raised in the first letter received and
consecutively numbered. The responses are provided for issues(16)raised in the six letters received
from representatives of six agencies.
July 14th, 2000 letter from Britta L Bloomberg, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer,
State Historic Preservation Office, Minnesota Historical Society
1. Issue "...The response to question 25a indicates that there are recorded archaeological
properties in the project area. Because this area has good probability of containing
unrecorded sites, we recommend that an archeological survey of the project parcel be
completed as part of the planning process."
Response Past uses of the project site include farming,mining, gas pipeline right-of-way
construction, electric power line construction and development and operation of a railroad
line including a second spur line. Because the site has previously been disturbed without
recorded encounter of historic resources, further investigation is unwarranted.
The nearby historic resources are three well-defined items,none of which are thought to be
on the project site. The most proximate is an Indian burial mounds area physically separated
from the site by the Vermillion River. The City will require a condition of the special use
permit that will require the applicant to be sensitive to undisturbed areas on the site
and will require notification if historic resources are encountered.
2. Issue However, if the project is considered for financial assistance or requires
federal permits the applicant must submit the project to the MHS for review under
the requirements of the Section 106 of National Historic Preservation Act.
1
Response The funding for this project will not include federal assistance and federal
permits are not required. Therefore, further review by the Minnesota Historical Society is
not be necessary.
June 28", 2000 letter from Paul Czech, Senior transportation planer/Local Government
Liaison, Minnesota Department of Transportation
Comment The Minnesota Department of transportation has reviewed the EA Wand has no
comments, as this development does not directly impact state highway right of way..
Response The Hastings City Council concurs with this opinion.
August 2"d, 2000 letter from JoAnn M. Kyral, National Parks Service, Department of the
Interior
Comment The National Parks service concluded that the "EAW adequately addresses
the major impacts of the project area and there is no need for an EIS" .Staff provided
several items for consideration...
Response The Hastings City Council concurs with this opinion.
3. Issue "Compatibility of the project with state Critical Area requirements should be
discussed in the response to question 27".
Response The City shall add conditions to the special use permit to adequately address state
critical area requirements. A condition will specifically be added that will require the use
of native and natural vegetation to restore disturbed areas.
July 11"',2000 letter from Thomas W.Balcom,Supervisor,Natural Resources Environmental
Review and Assistance Unit, Office of Management and Budget Services, Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR)
4. Issue The DNR staffprovided comments regarding Critical Area compliance for this
project.
Response The City shall add conditions to the special use permit to adequately address
state critical area requirements. A condition will specifically be added that will require the
use of native and natural vegetation to restore disturbed areas..
5. Issue Item 6 The DNR recommended an increased setback from the Vermillion River
within the City of Hastings.
2
Response The City has established a 75 foot wide shoreland impact zone landward from the
river. The City will require a revised mining plan and will attach a condition to the special
use permit that will not allow any disturbance in these area.
6. Issue Item8 The DNR refers to the water appropriations permit for this project.
Response
The DNR issued its water appropriation permit in 1993. The Company has been operating
its wash plant pursuant to that permit since that time without any known impacts to water
levels. In fact,the DNR has subsequently issued an additional groundwater appropriation
permit to Holst Excavating which would not have been issued if there were an adverse effect
to groundwater resources. The DNR manages water appropriations and has developed a
statutory framework to deal with any conflicts that may arise in water appropriation. The
_DNR has established a hierarchy that prefers domestic supplywells to aggregate wash plants
and accordingly will use the water appropriation permitting process to protect domestic
water supplies.
No modification of the DNR water appropriation permit is requested or needed for this
proj ect.
7. Issue Item Ha The DNR comments suggest that the description offish and wildlife
resources should be expanded
Response These resources are not discussed in detail because the project includes
modification of existing activities so that potential effects to the Vermillion River are
reduced. By eliminating the need for dewatering to extract the mineral resources, facility
development is actually more protective of the river. The DNR's additional information
about the Vermillion River provides a greater basis for acting to protect resources by
eliminating dewatering.
8. Issue Item Ila-The DNR comments that there is 20%reduction in wooded areas and
that this is a cumulative that should be acknowledged.
Response There is a loss of some upland woodland. Of the 45 acres of upland and wetland
wooded areas, 37 acres will not be disturbed by the project.
There is a very small impact to upland wooded areas in Phase IV of the mining operation.
The City will mitigate this impact by requiring a special use permit condition providing for
tree plantings in the area of the shoreland impact zone that has been affected by historic
farming practices (pre-mining). This will help establish a wildlife habitat area.
3
July 19"', 2000 letter from Helen A. Boyer, Director Environmental Services, Metropolitan
Council
Comment The Metropolitan Council Staff has reviewed the EAWand do not recommend
that an Environmental Impact statement be performed. They also passed along comments
and concerns in regards Critical Areas.
Response The Hastings City Council concurs with this opinion.
9. Issue Metropolitan Council staff comments that the cover type totals are not equal.
Response The cover types table is an accurate discussion of the before and after scenarios.
It is important to recognize that the project includes not only mining and processing,but also
site reclamation after completion of mining and processing.
".
Issue "Istrcpolitan Council staff provided cor::-mts about Cr ':.:' "_reps and
MNRRA requirements
Response The City shall add conditions to the special use permit to adequately address state
critical area requirements. A condition will specifically be added that will require the use
of native and natural vegetation to restore disturbed areas.
July 12`h, 2000 letter from Kurt Chatfield, Principal Planner, Office of Planning,
Dakota County
10. Issue Item 8-Dakota County staff comments that two other approvals will be required
including a well sealing permit and registration of the concrete asphalt processing
operation..
Response The City of Hastings passed these comments onto the Mining company who had
the following response.The project is only the reconfiguration of the existing mining limits.
Accordingly, the project does not include establishment of new concrete or asphalt
processing or recycling activities. The current concrete and asphalt processing operations
are registered with Dakota County. When the project extends to the current farmhouse area,
the well will most likely need to be abandoned. As part of that abandonment,the Company
acknowledges that a well abandonment approval will be needed from Dakota County.
11. Issue Item 10-Dakota County staff comments that the cover type totals are not equal
Response The cover types table is an accurate discussion of the before and after scenarios.
It is important to recognize that the project includes not only mining and processing,but also
site reclamation after completion of mining and processing.
4
12. Issue Item 13-Dakota County staff comments that when the on-site well is abandoned,
the Mining Company will follow all requirements of both state and county regulations.
Response The City will add a condition to the special use permit that will require all on-site
wells to be abandoned according to Dakota County Ordinance No. 114.
13. Issue Item 19-Dakota County staff comments that a sentence describing the Geology
of the site should be revised.
Response The sentence in the EAW will be revised to the following:
The Jordan sandstone forms the subcrop in the western and southeastern portions of the site.
Issue Item 21 -Dakota County staff comments that no Significant changes in traffic are
shown and that any new access would require a permit form the county.
Response No changes in traffic patterns are contemplated in the project. The site will
continue to be served by the two existing accesses to County Road 54. No new access is
proposed.
15. Issue Item 27-Dakota County staff comments that the mining operation is within the
Critical and MNRRA areas of the Mississippi.
Response The City will address Critical Area and MNRRA requirements through the special
use permitting process. Conditions will be added to require native vegetation as part of the
reclamation process as well as the protection of existing wetlands on the site. This site can
not be viewed from the Mississippi River.
16. Issue Item 30-Dakota County staff comments that there are more known and potential
environmental and public health impacts that should be addressed including the Following:
A. Hastings - Glendale Road Dump
B. Davies Excavating Dump
C. Other Waste Disposal
D. Soo Line Fuel Spill
E. Sedimentation Impacts
Response The City passed on these comments to the mining company who had the following
response:
Hastings/Glendale Road Dump
5
The Hastings/Glendale Road dump groundwater contamination is not discussed in the EAW
because the site has been taken off the Superfund list. Based upon de-listing,there is not an
environmental hazard requiring further response action. The proposed project would not
involve dewatering for excavation. Groundwater movements from the Glendale Road dump
site would not be affected.
The site was removed from the Superfand list in June of 1996. Contamination hazards have
been mitigated by the city under the supervision of Dakota County and the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency. Both Dakota County and the MPCA raised issues about the wash
plant at the site. We have previously provided you with a copy of an analysis dated July 23,
1987 performed by Dr. Gordon Hess, a consulting geologist. This analysis confines that at
1,500 gallons per minute,the wash plant does not affect the contaminants migrating from the
Hastings/Glendale Road Dump. Accordingly, this issue should not require further
evaluation.
Davies Excavating Dump
We reviewed Dakota County files relating to Dump Site No. 7059. Essentially, it appears
that Dakota County has classified a portion of the site as the "Davies Excavating Dump"
during operation of this pit by Davies Excavating based upon the presence of public works
demolition debris and a waste stockpile from the facility. This is,accordingly,not a discreet
dump site, but rather identifies housekeeping issues that relate to a prior operation. The
Company has, and will continue to operate concrete and asphalt recycling stockpiles as part
of its ordinary operation. These stockpiles are established from concrete and bituminous
roadway, curb and gutter and similar items which are brought on site to be sorted, crushed
and re-processed into aggregates as part of the Company's recycling operation. In the course
of this activity, concrete rebar and other non-recyclable materials are removed. Tiller
Corporation collects that material and either recycles or properly disposes it.
Tiller Corporation does not own the subject property. There is, accordingly, some waste
material owned by the landlord C &D Enterprises which has accumulated in the vicinity of
the abandoned farmstead. It will be necessary for these materials to be removed at the time
the farmstead is removed in order to facilitate mining in that area. Any potential concerns
relating to these materials can be addressed by a permit condition requiring these materials
to be removed before mining occurs in the vicinity of the farmstead.
Soo Line Fuel Spill
The fuel spill occurred as part of a train derailment on Christmas Eve 1989 when twenty coal
cars were derailed. Dick Kable of MPCA reported the spill to Dakota County. Remediation
of this spill is under MPCA's jurisdiction.
Unnamed Dump
6
The unnamed dump (Site No. 7078) is a discreet deposit of construction materials and in
April of 1996 included some other wastes. The main component of this area is the concrete
recycling pile. The concrete recycling stockpile will continue at its current location as part
of its operation. Rebar and other non-recyclable debris will be sorted and properly disposed.
Although this area is on the site mined by Tiller Corporation, it is not owned by Tiller
Corporation. C&D Enterprises owns this site.
Sedimentation Impacts
The mine operation as described in the EAW will contain all surface water within the pit
area. There is no sediment erosion hazard presented. Overburden stockpiles, if any, are
protected by vegetative cover and do not present erosion hazards.
The site is governed by an NPDES permit which requires the imposition of best management
practices to control surface water runoff. These best management practices have been in
place since Tiller Corporation began operating the site. The site is operated by establishing
stockpiles which generally exist over winter and spring and are subsequently removed.
Historically,during spring flood events,the site has not been inundated by moving water,but
rather floods as a consequence of rising water table elevations. Accordingly, Tiller
Corporation has not experienced any significant sedimentation loss of its granular stockpiles.
Current sedimentation occurs from farming practices. During development of the mine,the
fine top-soil materials will be protected by vegetation and thus reduce the potential for
sedimentation
The City will add conditions to the Special use permit requiring the removal of waste from
the phase 1 mining area before mining can occur in this area.
EIS Decision Process
The standard for the decision is : Does the project have the "potential for significant
environmental effects?" In answering the question the City must compare the impacts
which may be reasonably expected to occur from the project with the following criteria:
1. Type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects
2. Cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects;
3. The extent to which environmental effects are subject to mitigation by
ongoing public regulatory authority; and
4. The extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled
as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or
the project proposer, or of EIS's previously prepared.
7
Purpose of EIS if ordered - The purpose of the EIS is to provide information for
governmental units, the proposers of the project , and other persons to evaluate proposed
projects which have the potential for significant environmental effects, to consider
alternatives to the proposed project, and to explore methods for reducing adverse
environmental effects.
Conclusion
This property was recently farmed and is now being mined with a sand and gravel operation.
There are many natural features on the property. The property includes flood plains,
shorelands,wetlands and is in the MNRRA Critical Area. The use of the property as a gravel
operation is an appropriate use for the site as the reclamation of the property will leave it as
a natural area with more wetland habitat. Mining operations do have environmental impacts,
but they also have a limited life span . There is a community need for sand and gravel and
ti:rc c.T6 less Lypo:t.0 tics to site these operations appropriaZc.y as the arca bLt wAiw n c
urbanized.
The City has adopted many local ordinances to protect its natural features and amenities.
These ordinances include a floodplain ordinance,a shoreland ordinance,and a Critical Areas
Ordinance (in process of being approved/Executive Order 79-19 enforced in the interim).
The City will address and mitigate where feasible the environmental impacts of this mining
operation through it's Special Use Permit process. This special use permit is reviewed
yearly.
Based on the information developed during the preparation of the EAW and the
correspondence received during the EAW comment period, it is felt that although there are
various concerns associated with the development, it would appear that the preparation of
an EIS is not warranted. The environmental issues and concerns raised through the EAW
process can be addressed as part of the local permitting process for the mining operation.
Summary: The issues raised in the comment letters have been addressed by by the City of
Hastings and Barton Sand and Gravel. The Hastings City Council has determined that an EIS
is not necessary for this project.
8
HASTINGS CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO.
_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS ADOPTING
A RECORD OF DECISION AND CONCLUSIONS PERTAINING TO THE
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET FOR THE BARTON SAND AND
GRAVEL COUNTY RD 54 GRAVEL PIT AND DETERMINING THAT AN
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED TO BE
COMPLETED FOR SAID PROJECT.
Council member introduced the following Resolution
and moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, An Environmental Assessment Worksheet, hereafter referred to as EAW,
was prepared pursuant to MEQB Rule#4410.4300 Subpart 19a; and
WHEREAS, the availability of the EAW was property published in the E.Q.B Monitor
and the Hastings Star Gazette and was distributed to the required agencies and made available to
the general public; and
WHEREAS, the EAW has passed through the required thirty day review period during
which written comments were received by the city; and
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Hastings , acting as the Responsible
Governing Unit , has reviewed the EAW and all timely comments have been made regarding said
EAW and have reviewed the Record of Decision and Conclusions and recommendations as
related to the EAW and has further reviewed the standards and criteria of MQEB Rule 4410.4300
Subpart 19a;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HASTINGS AS FOLLOWS:
That the Record of Decision is hereby adopted and that a determination has been made that an
Environmental Impact Statement is not required to be completed for the Barton Sand and Gravel
County Rd 54 Gravel Pit .
Council member moved a second to this resolution and upon
being put to a vote it was unanimously adopted by all Council Members present.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
ATTEST:
Michael D. Werner,Mayor
Melanie Mesko
Administrative Assistant/ City Clerk
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of resolution presented to and
adopted by the City of Hastings, County of Dakota, Minnesota, on the 7th of August, 2000 as
disclosed by the records of the City of Hastings on file and of record in the office.
Melanie Mesko
Administrative Assistant/City Clerk ( SEAL)
This instrument drafted by:
City of Hastings
101 4th ST.
Hastings, MN 55033
VIII-B-3
Memo
To: Mayor Werner and City Council
From: Matthew Weiland, City Planner
Date: August 3rd , 2000
Subject: First Reading/Order Public Hearing- Rezone(Guardian Angels Block R-2 to
R-4 PRD)
— St. Elizabeth Ann Seaton Church has reques.,d the r.-Zoning: .�Yerty U'i,y .:. (legally -
described below) from R-2 Medium Density Residence to R-4 PRD Medium High Density
Residence Planned Residential Development. The property proposed for development is 1.8
acres in size and is located along 4th St E and Sibley St(see site location map). The property in
question is legally described below :
All of Block 30 Town of Hastings, according to the recorded plat thereof, situated in
Dakota County,Minnesota
Background Information:
Comprehensive Plan Classification: The subject property is currently classified U-III(High
Density Urban Residential 8+residential units/acre). The proposed R-4 PRD Medium High
Density Residence Planned Residential Development is a consistent zoning for this land use.
The land use for this property will be classified mixed use once the 2020 Comprehensive Plan is
approved. The proposed R-4 PRD Medium High Density Residence Planned Residential
Development is a consistent zoning for this land use also.
Zoning Classification: The subject property is currently zoned R-2 Medium Density Residence.
The Applicants are requesting the property be rezoned to R-4 PRD Medium High Density
Residence Planned Residential Development. This zoning classification allows for a
combination of single and multiple family housing as well as a mixture of uses. The area around
this property is comprised of many housing types and a variety of land uses. This is a good
zoning classification for redevelopment property because it allows for a mixture of densities and
a higher housing density which are goals of the City's Comprehensive plan.
Surrounding Properties: The area surrounding this property is currently zoned R-2 Medium
Density Residence and C-3 Community Regional Commerce. The area around this property is
comprised of many different housing types and a mixture of uses from commercial to
government offices.
Planning Consideration:
The applicant's property is located in an existing historic neighborhood that is filled with many
different uses. The R-4 PRD zoning classification would allow this property to be redeveloped
with a mixture of uses and a higher housing density which would allow for more affordable
housing in the City. This property is identified as a redevelopment property in the 2020
Comprehensive Plan and the proposed zoning is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive
Plan.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning of the property to R-4 PRD
Medium High Density Residence Planned Residential Development and at their 7/31/00
Planning Commission Meeting.
Recommended Action::
Recommendation to approve the first reading of an ordinance rezoning the property to R-
4 PRD Medium High Density Residence Planned Residential Development and order a
public hearing for August 21st, 2000.
ORDINANCE NO. , SECOND SERIES
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA AMENDING SECTION
10.01, SUBDIVISION 1 OF THE CITY CODE HAVING TO DO WITH:
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Hastings as follows:
Subdivision 1. The following described properties are hereby zoned from R-2 Medium Density
Residence TO R4 PRD High Density Residence PLANNED RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
"`rail o£Hiuck 3fi Tuwn of Hastings, according to the recuriled pia'r thereof, dud siiau a in—a cu a`
County, Minnesota
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 21st DAY OF August, 2000.
Michael D. Werner,Mayor
ATTEST:
Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/ City Clerk
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of an ordinance presented to and
adopted by the City of Hastings, County of Dakota, Minnesota, on the 215`day of August, 2000,
as disclosed by the records of the City of Hastings on file and of record in the office.
Melanie Mesko, Administrative Assistant/ City Clerk
(SEAL)
This instrument drafted by:
City of Hastings
101 4th ST.
Hastings, MN 55033
v
r
gq Guardian Angels
Rezoning
s
400
�^ fsw
'. `w �Y : r s•v-i m »+ 'r->�c. kw Q t..uw 1. n i "" "'k
1 U-III U-I i
U-111 Legend
-} ` 2020 wmpOatanc p
FF
�k�yt WD-Wmd Use
_......:.,mil-
.ufii O-Olflee
�1+a
P-Putl
z f i W-UAen RadE 13 uibs'Ua sae
ir. if ^'�- fr. r U-I WI-UOM ReYE 48WW¢ie
i ;t' q R- s Q R-Pw
R '3a e a �'•', iz mei r C-3 ; O
q ' x C n ROW RVtaWey wiehae
777"
Rwd
ero
Rezonin - R-2 to R-4 R-214 1 _
� ��., y"w«w:=...,,.m.• .'+r �.a.-:F.i c ,a.,.,,:: ..avIg,,,,�JI, s.,,.o...,,w;,�m < �, .i.
w E
5 UI
t U
u x a U-I11 I 'i
r _ y
e n P'
R-2 € r : U I Site Location
£}3
.w ..... L. - L 1 .:F-,..: ..3 3� J
E
p wyxivam
� 'Y= 41 l i t iy # t
Y
i
ks f'
This is not a survey
VIII-s-4
Memo
To: Mayor Werner and City Council
From: Matthew Weiland, City Planner
Date: August 3rd, 2000
Subject: Site Plan - Guardian Angels Block
Guardian Angell: Prr ;, act
Sherman and Associates,private developers, have requested site plan approval for a mixed use
redevelopment project of the Guardian Angels Block. The proposed project is a redevelopment
and infill mixed use project located near the City's historic downtown and river front area that
will intensify an existing land use. The project will be a mixture of redevelopment and historic
preservation of an existing historic church, rectory and three story school building as well as new
construction of affordable rental townhomes.
This project fulfills many goals for the City of Hastings Comprehensive Plan, including the
following:
1. This project provides historic preservation of existing buildings
through adaptive re-use of the buildings.
2. This project intensifies the land use of an existing developed
property by creating more and varied housing units in the
downtown area where parks, shopping and jobs are within an easy
walk.
3. This project provides affordable housing in mixture of housing
types designed appropriately to blend in well with the
neighborhood.
4. This project is a redevelopment infill project that would take
advantage of existing infrastructure
This project is a redevelopment infill project that would include a mixture of four different uses.
All of these uses are appropriate for the site and compliment each other. The project would
include affordable housing, an affordable day care center, a battered women shelter, and in the
church, a program and gathering space for public and private uses including arts,performance,
education and services(see Site Plan). The housing part of the project would include two
different housing types. There would be 20 affordable apartments built in the existing school
1
building and there would be 12 new rental town homes constructed(see Site Plan). Six of the
twelve townhomes would be market rate townhomes while the other six would be affordable
townhomes. This would be a mixed income housing project serving a variety of people with
different income levels.
The property proposed for development is a one city block in size (1.8 acres) and is located
northeast of the intersection of 4' St E and Sibley St (site location map enclosed). The property
will also have to be rezoned. Any recommendations for the site plan will be contingent upon the
property being rezoned. There were many concerns from the surrounding neighbors regarding
this project. Their main concerns centered around the building architecture and the rental use of
the property. Their concerns will be addressed in this memo.
Included with this memo is a site location map, land use application, and site plan .
Background Information:
Comprehensive Plan Classification: The subject property is classified U-III (Urban Residential 8
+residential units/acre). The proposed development density for the subdivision is @16 units per
acre. This is a consistent use with the comprehensive plan. The main reason the density on this
project is so high, is because of the apartments being built in the existing three story building.
The average neighborhood density surrounding this project is 4 units per acre.
Zoning Classification: The subject property is currently zoned R-2 Medium density residence.
The proposed zoning is R-4 (PRD) High Density Residence Planned Residential Development .
A mixed use project at this density would be a permitted use in this district as part of a planned
residential development. The setbacks of the buildings will also be adjusted as part of the
planned residential development process.
Surrounding Properties: The subject property is currently located in a mixed use area. The
property was once uses a church , a rectory and a school. The uses surrounding the property
include government offices, single family homes, apartments, and commercial areas.
Site Development Issues: The subject property includes existing buildings in an existing well
established historic neighborhood. There is a desire from the City to preserve the historic
building while allowing the property to be developed to a higher and greater use. Any project in
this area must be sensitive to the existing historic neighborhoods and compliment them.
Site Plan
1. Proposed Uses and Lot Lam
The proposed uses for the site are appropriate for the site and complement each other. A
day care/pre-school will serve not only this project well,but also the neighborhoods and
2
downtown area around it. The shelter will also provide a needed service in this area.
The proposed uses will also allow for the adaptive reuse of the existing buildings which
will serve to historically preserve the buildings. There are a mixture of uses throughout
this area as well as mixture of housing types. The new buildings and parking lot are
located appropriately for this historic area. The new town homes are located close to the
property lines with their parking areas in the rear. The parking area is located behind the
buildings which will buffer it from the road.
2. Zoning Setback requirements: Proposed parking areas meet zoning setbacks. The new
town home units are being placed closer to property lines to match the building setbacks
on the property and in the area. The town home units are being placed 10 - 15 ft off of
property lines instead of the usual 20 ft required by the zoning ordinance. This is
allowed as part of the planned residential development process.
3. Nu nber of Parking S ac.;6: The Zoning 01 diianc; requires at least 2 parking spaces for
every residential dwelling unit. There are 20 apartments, 12 rental townhomes and 4
units in the shelter for a total of 36 units. This would require 72 parking spaces. The
townhomes and the shelter have garages and garage stalls that will meet this 2 parking
space requirement. There are only 26 off street parking stalls for the apartments which
would require 40 parking spaces. This leaves a shortage of 14 parking stalls to meet the
Zoning Ordinance requirement for residential parking. The project also includes a
daycare and preschool. The daycare and preschool would require one parking spot for
every classroom and one parking spot for every 30 children. There would be a total of
two classrooms. The preschool would have 30 kids and the daycare would have 30 kids
for a total of 60 kids. The parking requirement for the preschool/daycare would be 4
parking spots. The preschool/daycare parking spots would be satisfied through shared
parking with the off street residential parking spaces. The need for the parking spots in
the day for the school would be opposite the need for the parking lot at night by the local
residents. The Developer is also proposing to create a preschool/dayeare drop-off area
along Sibley St.
The Zoning Ordinance allows the City Council to allow off site parking if there is
adequate off-street parking available within 400 ft of the project. There would be
adequate parking available at the City's public parking lot. Guest parking would use the
on street parking spaces or the City's lot. The demand for parking from this project
would come at night which is opposite toe City's demand for the parking area during the
daytime. Most of the units in the apartment building would only have one car. A
majority of the residents in the apartment building are predicted to be seniors. 8 units if
the apartments are one bedroom units. The parking issues are a big concern of the
neighborhoods and there are many different options to consider to address the parking
needs of this project as listed below:
3
Option Description
Option A Accept the current proposed site plan with shared parking allowed in
the City's Public parking lot on 4' St E. The need for the apartment's
parking during night time hours would be opposite the City's need for
the parking during the day.
Option B Require the developer to provide off street parking in another location
within 400 ft of the apartment building. City Staff is currently
working with the Developer on this proposal
Option C Require the developer to satisfy the parking requirement totally on
the subject property. This would eliminate some green space. The
Developer is working on reconfiguring the parking areas to gain
parking spots.-
Require
ots..
Option D Require the Developer to eliminate apartment units from the project,
if none of the other parking options are feasible.
There are many ways to address the parking needs of this project. The parking needs are
currently being investigated by the developers and City Staff. The parking issue can be
appropriately addressed.
4. Site Access: Access to the subject property will be provided off of Ramsey St and Sibley
St. These streets provide good access to this site.
5. Traffic Circulation Issues: Traffic Circulation within the site flows well. The two
entrances are connected by a private drive. The private drive and parking areas have been
designed to slow down traffic within the site. The Developer is also proposing a drop off
area along Sibley St for the preschool/daycare.
6. Traffic lssues: There are no traffic issues within the site and the street network around the
property is designed to serve this type of use.
7. Trail Connections: There are existing sidewalks on all four sides of this project that will
remain. Internal sidewalks will also be constructed to connect to the existing sidewalks,
allowing safe pedestrian flow through the site.
8. Streets and Utilities: The Public Works Director has reviewed the streets and utility plans
and has approved them with the following comment:
1. The streets and utilities in the area are old and need to be reconstructed. The
utilities in 4' St E have to be reconstructed and updated in order to serve this
project and the neighborhoods appropriately. A looped water main also needs to
4
be constructed between 4' St E and 5" St E along Sibley St to provide adequate
fire protection in the area. Finally, the roads in the area need to be reconstructed
to solve drainage problems and provide safer parking and traffic circulation. The
roads and utilities in this area needed to be reconstructed at some point. They are
on the City's reconstruction list. It wasn't a matter of if to do these projects, but a
matter of when to do these projects. This is a good time to reconstruct these roads
as part of a new development process. The City would pay for upgrading of the
exiting utilities in the street from existing utility funds. The City would also pay
to reconstruct the center 24 ft of the road. The remainder of the costs would be
assessed to all benefitting property owners. A condition of site plan approval
would require that these road and utility improvements be initiated prior to
building permit approval for this project. The shelter may be occupied prior to the
road projects being completed.
The Public W:,rk; Director is sa�;gc:ting the :g road c:ons::uction to be done in
this area. The road construction work would be proposed for summer 2001.
1. Reconstruct 4"' St E from Sibley St to Tyler St.
2. Reconstruct 5"' St E from Hwy 61 to Tyler St.
3. Reconstruct Sibley St from 40' St E to 8" St E
2. The developer should have separate water meters and water lines installed for all
irrigation systems.
9. Site Grading,& Storm Water Management: The Site is designed to drain correctly through
the use of curb and gutter and a catch basin/storm water sewer system that will connect
into existing storm sewer in Ramsey St.
10. Interceptor Sewer: The developer shall be required to pay$305.00 per lot in interceptor
sewer charges,prior to the city releasing the final plat hardshells. The interceptor sewer
charge for this project totals $12,200.00 for 40 units. The developer shall interceptor
sewer credits for existing buildings.
11. Li tin : Any building lighting will have to have to be focused down with cut off
shields.
12. Site Landscaping: The proposed landscape plan includes large amount and a wide
spectrum of different trees and shrubs. The Landscape plan compliments the site and the
buildings as well as the neighborhoods in the area. The landscape plan includes many
historic landscape features such as daylilies, irises, roses, and lilacs. This is an excellent
landscape plan that enhances this development and the neighborhood around it. Only a
few minor additions to the landscaping plan are suggested. The landscape plan shall be
modified as follows:
5
1. Boulevard trees shall be planted every 50 ft along Sibley St and 5' St.
2. Two trees shall be placed in the front yard of 5 unit building along 5' St.
13. Building Architectural Elevations The developer has worked with the City's Historic
Preservation Committed(HPC)to develop building plans that will compliment the
historic area. The HPC finds that the new buildings are compatible with the
neighborhood in terms of size,materials and general design(letter enclosed). This
property is not in the Historic District,but the developer has been willing to add
historical features and accents to the town home buildings to make them more
compatible with the area and the existing brick school building. The Developer is also
working with the City's HRA on getting a loan to put a brick veneer on the front of the
town home buildings. The City's HRA has given preliminary approval for the loan
(letter enclosed).
14. Building Issues The developer will have to address all fire safety,building safety and
accessability issues as part of the building plan review process.
15. Fire Safety Issues: The site is adequately served with fire hydrants and good access to all
the buildings for fire safety. The developer will have meet the requirements for fire
protection in the existing school building and church. This may require fire sprinklers
and will be addressed as part of the building plan review. The site plan shall be modified
to show a fire protection water line if required.
16. Waste Storage: The developer shall identify how and where waste storage shall be
handled on the site. Any outdoor dumpsters must be completely screened.
Neighborhood Concerns: A neighborhood meeting was conducted June 8th, 2000 to discuss this
project. There were many comments received and concerns raised at the neighborhood open
house for this project. Most of the concerns revolved around the appearance of the new
buildings. City staff is working with the developer on the design of these buildings to make them
more compatible with the existing neighborhood. The Hastings Heritage Preservation
Commission has reviewed the developers building plans. The developers have incorporated
their comments and recommendations into new building design plans. The Developer is also
proposing to use brick on the front of the town home units to make the buildings more historic in
appearance and help them compliment the existing brick school on the site.
There were also concerns raised about this project being a rental project. There are many rental
units throughout the neighborhoods surrounding this project. The City needs more rental
housing. A community is made up of a wide range of people with a wide range of incomes and
needs. It is the City's goal to provide housing for all the people that make up this community, not
just parts of it. The tenants of these rental units are working people. This would be a mixed
income project. There would be affordable housing as well as market rate housing on this
6
property. This project incorporates people into the community,rather than segregating them to
small areas. The City does not have the authority to require this project to be rental or owner
occupied housing. The City is not the owner of the property. How successful these projects are
is determinated by the owners and managers of the project. This would be a private development
and privately managed by the private sector, not the public sector. The developers have a lot of
experience owning and managing this type of project. The City works towards balancing the
concerns of the neighbors with the goals of the project to get the best project possible.
Planning Commission Public Hearing (Minutes Enclosed):
A number of issues were raised at the Planning Commission Public Hearing held 7/31/00. The
main issues revolved around parking issues, playground issues, amount of people, management
of the site, and shelter issues. The parking issues can be addressed through one on the proposed
options previously discussed. The neighbors were also concerned about the amount of kids in
tl. 4: rel;,r:rer.. .�.4-U� s>ze 3rthc playground, as well as the lack of recreztio^.al oYportuni}_=
in the area. City Staff would argue that there are a number of recreational resources in the area
including the following(see map):
Name Distance
St Elizabeth Anne Seaton 2 blocks
School Playground
Wilson Park 2 blocks
Levee Park/River 3 blocks
Kennedy School Playground 6 blocks
Lake Isabel Park 7 blocks
The developer is also proposing to double the size of the play area on site. This play area will
include playground equipment. The Planning Commission also recommended that the City
Council investigate further park creation in the first ward. The existing St Elizabeth Ann Seaton
site and the middle school site offer redevelopment potential with possible park space. This
property is guided for high density housing. This property will have a lot of people on it
regardless of it being an affordable family housing project or not. The Developer has also
indicated that there will be an onsite manger for this project. The onsite manager is responsible
for the maintenance of the project and well as enforcing the rules and regulations of the project.
The Community Action Council(CAC) addressed the concerns about a battered women's
shelter. Unfortunately, there are a need for these shelters in this community and throughout the
county. This shelter will add critical services to this community. The affordable housing and the
affordable daycare linked to this project will also serve to further a women's transition and
opportunity to get away from a domestic abusive situation. One of the biggest reasons women
7
stay in domestic abuse situations is that they have no place to go or can not afford to go
anywhere. The CAC also submitted a letter from the Inver Grove Heights Police Department in
support of the shelter(enclosed).
Planning Consideration: This is a great redevelopment mixed use project that meets many of the
goals of the City's Comprehensive Plan. It is intensifying the land use of an existing area and
adding more housing density to the core of the City, instead of sprawling outside the City. This
project compliments the neighborhoods and mixtures of uses in the area. The project will
historically preserve buildings the community has an interest in saving. The new shelter and
daycare/pre-school will add valued services to the City. The Church will add a unique public
space that may serve a variety of needs. Finally, the affordable housing will help the City address
it's rental housing shortage and provide more life cycle housing in the community. The
developers of the project have a lot of experience building and managing these projects. The site
is well designed with good landscaping and attractive buildings. This redevelopment project will
add'value fo the neighborhoods and areas around it.
Planning Commission Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Guardian Angles Redevelopment
Site Plan at their 7/31/00 Planning g Commission Meeting, subject to the following
conditions:
Recommended Action:
Guardian Angels Block Redevelopment Site Plan
Motion to Recommend to the City Council the approval of the Guardian Angels Block
Redevelopment Site Plan subject to following:
1. That the proposed structure and accessory items including,but not limited
to,the parking lot and landscaping shall be completed pursuant to the
approved site plan. Upon request for occupancy of the building, all
uncompleted items contained within the site plan shall be addressed
pursuant to city code escrow requirements.
2. Site Plan approval is contingent upon the rezoning of the property to R-4
PRD.
3. That the developer shall install separate water meters and water lines
installed for all irrigation systems.
4. That the developer modify the landscape plan to include the following
elements subject to approval of the City Planner:
8
A. Boulevard trees shall be planted every 50 ft along Sibley St. and 5" St.
E.
B. Two trees shall be placed in the front yard of 5 unit building along 5th
Ramsey St.
5. That road and utility improvements for 4th St. E, 5th St. E, and Sibley St.
must be ordered before the issuance of building permits for this project.
6. That the shelter may be occupied before the road improvements are ordered.
7. That the developer will work with the HPC to develop building plans that
compliment the surrounding neighborhoods.
a. Thai ibc uevciopei s pall be required to address all fire safety, buiiding
safety, and accessability requirements for the use of the new and existing
buildings as part of the building plan review.
9. That the developer shall identify how and where waste storage shall be
handled on the site. Any outdoor dumpsters must be completely screened.
10. That parking requirements for this project must be met through one of the
following four options:
Option A- Accept the current proposed site plan with shared parking
allowed in the City's Public parking lot on 4`h St E.
Option B - Require the developer to provide off street parking in another
location within 400 ft of the apartment building.
Option C - Require the developer to satisfy the parking requirement
totally on the subject property.
Option D - Require the Developer to eliminate apartment units from the
project, if none of the other parking options are feasible.
11. That the site plan shall be modified to increase the play area as much as
feasible, subject to the approval of the City Planner.
12. That the Developer shall establish a drop off area on Sibley St and 4" St for
the daycare/preschool.
9
13. That residential parking permits should be investigated for Sibley,Ramsey
and 5' St to control on street parking.
1
10
• :we-a:
�!: ••
i lmiF A
miiie. E
nm��n:anc:c—
OPUMM
raj°
r;r �.a o a+�"►
� •r:a;<: '+i � . mall eF''�'I�° ►.
♦II II I II
III I_i�I'Hill �
0.
tr '✓ } � Y s .,� .: ,�nw.a'°'/ym+'a`ay"`ora��s+C.n�"6 +
• �, Hifi a �.•rl�+w.ir�_r, rr"y "°` w���' �,'.`��a�3da1ffi'• � �4�'..
,� rr rrrr r.x+ Yw ,�wrw rt "� n+rccu..ma�ar.amw ?. '
rrr^rrra , s w i�I� �..+u.�.�.rrw.w.�rrrrrr++r+ww+w.r r+r•rr+.. —w'
'+rr►r rrrr rr� r,.,m MIT
S
6W
�F.• :. i m n'��w a i �t a. 4a;r .b'itid r�
.i a a � �.� � r� "tiy`. �'�;^,�, �•ire� iii.
W77on
"� h� r•-" � �� � xl k£ fir.
it ii F a!
d
1
fY +•Y4
Y.
l
' r r • !h �y�.� ,�. ,s r i ><s sky 1� a
ri pp YDS
�lPY
1 771
t R..,
e,i �i r e r., • g na..
R f,s a n' L�iu�;,y t • � a Y S^� ,.rh �� .\� �.
a w
q rS It�l� I
L—
U.*_, a ,,. �.iTs.:�l4lL�1r _t.H' I�.k:jr� t£.t,,., t�a. ��.ms Fav >o -_ �t i•y„y. a ... .. ..�.�,...-...•...z,.>, _ _ ..
u;
MEW
ae� U 1 k•A dre,Jay •_ " Y ��� Y
r
e � P
r
a3 t■. �rbe.� .i P'S
as ' -I �I^ i.! o;
_ `�
lm-w
MJAm MMIMPMM
a
r a".
Yex. t� I'Ll rrr
s �5 'BMW
t rrrrr_i.r
' I
lam I u16.
wir� �®p
r p� I" 'C + ,
ut�� �.a!�L �g IIi� � i■i e 1 tWFE L V III
rrr _ �v I I ri .. -
F
I H 1 '-�11 I^ "ai I; ui :n J sig: e ® el .,.1 � Ir•� f�ei
jiti
II 'Al a,,
i $ ��d� IN.ffiI—IMM�R ® �jp bnm it ry
r. a it Ir i r= •P
,` sT �I � # III• I p■y I Yb� 09,9" ��`�Ild���l®3,1 IL_ .e� da C.'MM
a i Ji � � 1 i� � � Y . ��i���I�Y i� '®� � �_t. �wi i ,14R�1�-.I��■'�� ����k�� � ®��
EEE
iiim
.., I .; I .: .� -1110■° I
I
1IT I I I I ,I I > i l IPI i 1PI
�f— _f .��
Ill L97��"l�I�� �. � ..
Kill
IJ
rd
I_I CJI d � 1=I Ilii ■I I.-ME
_I Iim.m ;"—".8 ���Cl� i� 'r"
r •� � - ,��a _I
x r
'inn L'L tll C0o't• I �-
#f ��'_ Lima.
hH AN
jm m
1 gff� ..moi "� cRM-'� a..�H.".".' i�� IY'll ?3k.Hd:1 PL 1e H®i x H H
- � .�� �a.+ ll .�a I. ® -�L�, �� e r
FIA �6��
J_J L_
i MMS
' u i t �1�'I jam - _ i j -u �I I-`R� :• I HS I ��( II In ON ai ® '11HMIWi �
'4 I E �i 91 L _ �' - J to H J �, leer it rll_
Iwo „mow. ■� ' NH nI m F155-1119111-1.
MEp , �>S E_ t'6 J i7 d tea a..
E .•'+p' �'.'=.LJ�■I ti in'.�� �offl
e11 I d II a /� QMH u !
II�r9 n .e -lA -� rAH.i = �' Aw■ a .PI bu..' uiR at II
g r«.sl �'LI �ffiui I[-.1.�... I-7�-�'. ®® T_J L Ht 1'I� L l ,-A ERIN at t 011110 i
- J
tCJ . P
1
Hastings Planning Commission
July 31", 2000
Regular Meeting
7:00 p.m.
Commissioner Schultz called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
1. Roll Call
Commissioners Present: Anderson, Greil,Harrington, Schultz, Strauss, and Stotko
Commissioners Absent: None
f Freseui: City'r':anner Matthew Weiland, Associate i iu;iier lu-is Jens:;.:
2. Approve July 17', 2000 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes.
3. Public Hearing-Park Place Special Use Permit
The Public Hearing for this item was canceled as the project also needs to have a rezoning on the
property. The Public Hearing was rescheduled for the August 14`h Planning Commission meeting.
4. Public Hearing- Guardian Angels Redevelopment Block Rezoning
Chairman Schultz reopened the Public Hearing at 7:02 pm.
City Planner Matthew Weiland presented background information on the project.Planner Weiland
discussed issues raised during neighborhood meetings and the previous Planning Commission
meeting. Concerns regarding parking, landscaping, street reconstruction have been reviewed and
addressed as well as the project having been reviewed by the Heritage Preservation Commission and
the Housing and Redevelopment Authority.
Loren Bruggeman, Vice President of Development for Sherman and Associates gave some
background on his company, stating that they manage over 4,000 rental housing units.
The buildings will use red brick and limestone to1ceep the buildings in line with the existing church
and school.The developers are looking at possibly using vines along the rear of the building to give
it an "older"feeling.
This project will have on-site, full-time management. Sherman and Associates recently received
from HUD a Superior rating for their property management.
Joelene Evenson, Director of Violence Prevention for the Community Action Council, currently
operates the Robert B. Lewis House in Inver Grove Heights. She read a letter from Lt. Chuck
Kleckner, Patrol Commander for the Inver Grove Heights Department of Public Safety, regarding
2
police issues with the women's shelter. The letter stated that the women's shelter had no negative
impacts on the neighborhood and has not increased the calls for service in the area. Ms. Evenson
also noted that this shelter was strictly for battered women and their children; it would not be used
as a half-way house or sex-offender residence.
Mr. Bruggeman presented information from Pleasant Ridge townhomes about their typical renter.
Pleasant Ridge serves the same market as the affordable townhomes proposed in the Guardian
Angels project. The average income at Pleasant Ridge is$31,388 for a family of four. Ninety-three
percent of the families (27 of 29) are working families and 70% are from Hastings.
Chairman Schultz asked the audience if there were any comments from the public regarding the
rezoning of the block.
Kathy OBrien,222 E 5`h Street-Ms.O'Brien asked how a family making$31,000 could afford rents
of$900 a month. She expressed concerns that the play area was not large enough to accommodate
the potential number of children living on the block. She also questioned who would be running the
day care center,where the parking for the center employees would be located. She also asked if the
neighbor's really had a say in the project.
Planner Weiland responded the proposed rents are$500 to $900 and include the affordable units as
well as the units renting at market rate. The play area was approximately 30'x 70', and perhaps it
could be increased in size. He also added that Staff can address certain issues with regards to
developments,but issues such as rental versus owner occupied housing was not something the City
can dictate.
Mike McCabe, 804 Ramsey Street-He originally received information on a senior housing project
on this site,and was wondering what was being done to provide senior housing in the area. He also
feels that additional parking is required for this project. He also asked about whether the project
would have on-site management.
Loren Bruggeman responded to the questions, stating that originally this project was looked at as a
senior housing project,but the financing was not available to make the project work. This project
will have full-time on site management.
Chairman Schultz closed the Public Hearing at 7;,52 p.m. and asked Commissioners if they had any
comments or questions.
Commissioner Harrington asked if the current zoning was consistent with the Comp Plan and
Planner Weiland stated that it was not. He stated that the proposed R-4 zoning was consistent with
the Comp Plan.
Commissioner Greil expressed concerns about the rezoning limiting the site's possibilities.
Commissioner Anderson stated that the rezoning is based on the Comp Plan,ofwhich there had been
plenty of discussion. This project saves the church,rectory, and the school. Currently there are no
3
taxes being paid on the property as it is still owned by the church. This will be taxed at a high rate
that single family homes.
Mr. Bruggeman explained that once the sale is complete, the property will be assessed and placed
on the tax rolls. The TIF which is being considered for the site would rebate a portion of the
difference in the tax increase from the developed site to the site undeveloped,privately owned site.
Commissioner Stotko expressed his support for this project while acknowledging that issues such
as parking must be addressed.
Commissioner Greil stated that he joined the Planning Commission after the Comprehensive
Planning process.It is important to him that the church is saved,but he is concerned about how this
r , project,affects the neighborhood and the high density of housing in,thispart of t o
-� .He stated that
higher density housing located in the western parts of town are generally surrounded by open space.
Planning Commission Action:
Commissioner Anderson moved and Commissioner Harrington seconded to recommend to the
City Council to approve the rezoning of the property to R-4 PRD Medium High Density
Residence Planned Residential Development.
Upon vote taken, Ayes, 5;Nays, 1. Motion carried.
5. Site Plan - Guardian Angels Redevelopment Plan
Commissioner Greil verified that the townhome units all have one car garages and asked about
counting the parking space outside the garage.He also asked about where day care center employees
would park, and where the drop off/pick up space for the center would be.
Mr. Bruggeman stated that it is typical, especially in townhome developments to count the space
outside the garage as a parking space for the project.
Planner Weiland stated that it was anticipated the day are center employees would have shared
parking on-site with the residents.
Commissioner Anderson stated that Staff has presented viable options to address the parking issue.
Option A is shared use with the Municipal parking lot across the street. This lot is not full during
the day and is empty in the evenings.He feels that Option B is not viable,nor is Option C,as he feels
it is important to keep the green space north of the rectory. Option D is not a benefit to the site. He
suggested a curb cut area along Sibley Street as a pick up/drop off for the day care center.
Commissioner Harrington added that parking is generally allowed on street,but it is an issue that can
be raised with the City Council.
Commissioner Schultz added that she feels the curb cut along Sibley is the best option.
4
Mr. Bruggeman agreed, stating that the drop off area would be the most viable.
Commissioner Stotko asked for clarification on the parking counts and whether on street spaces
indicated on the plans were included in the totals.
Planner Weiland stated that on-street parking,while available for use by the residents is not counted
in the parking totals. A parking lot island was being eliminated to provide an additional 2 spaces.
Commissioner Greil inquired about park fees for the site.
Planner Weiland responded that the new apartment and townhome units would each pay$850.00
park dedication fee. The NRRC may choose to give the project some type of credit for the
playground area on site. The nev. uni s will also h- p . ng i;TAC.!SAC charges for the water and
sewer connections.
Ms. OBrien asked if the playground area was open to the neighborhood
Planner Weiland stated that it would be, yes.
Pat Handlson, 517 W 5`h Street, stated that he felt this was an exciting proposal,that it will provide
affordable housing which is much needed within the Hastings community.
Paul Kasel, 121 E 6' Street - stated that he has lived in the neighborhood since 1966 and is
concerned with parking. When the site was previously used as a school,many of the children were
bused to the school.
Mr. Bruggeman stated that the units have occupancy standards and residents are reviewed once per
year, to ensure that they comply with occupancy standards.
Mark OBrien expressed concern that this proj ect would have a negative effect on his property values.
Bob Hollenbeck, 212 '/z 2nd Street E stated that bulldozing this site would not be good for the
community and her is in favor of this project.
Mr. McCabe expressed concern over the height of the buildings.
Commissioner Anderson stated that neighbors can petition the City Council to make modifications
to on street parking in the area and possibly establishing a residential permitting system. The play
area is being made larger and that Staff should be trusted to work with the developer to accomplish
the conditions.
Chairman Schultz asked the Commission what their opinions were on the parking options provided.
She would prefer to see something more definite than Option A,shared parking with the municipal
lot.
5
Commissioner Harrington feels that Option B,requiring off-site parking within 400'is not a viable
option.
Commissioner Strauss doesn't like Option C,adding a parking lot in front of the shelter and reducing
the greenspace, isn't crazy about Option B,but feels that residential permits may help the situation
and alleviate the concerns of the neighbors. She reiterated that this project is not subsidized housing,
it is comparable to Pleasant Ridge Townhomes.
Planner Weiland stated that according to the police,calls in the Pleasant Ridge area are comparable
with other areas of the City, and there had been no prosecutable cases before the City Attorney.
Commissioner Greil moved that the Site Plan review be tabled,that the developer redesign the units
to be,two,stories.in height, and creative parking to address all the narking needs. The motion failed _
for lack of a second.
Planner Weiland stated that the steeper pitched roofs were added due to neighborhood concerns that
the units were too "horizontal."
John Grossman, Staff liaison to the HPC, stated that the HPC reviewed the units and felt they were
appropriate,that they were compatible with the neighborhood in size and materials. The verticality
of the units was also compatible.
Commissioner Strauss feels that under the parking options, Option C should be deleted.
Commissioner Greil inquired about waste service for the site.
Mr. Bruggeman stated that the townhomes would have individual waste pick-up while the
apartments would have sort of interior garbage site. If located outdoors it would be fully screened.
Planning Commission Action:
Commissioner Strauss moved and Commissioner Anderson seconded a motion to recommend
to the City Council the approval of the Guardian Angels Block Redevelopment Site Plan
subject to following:
1. That the proposed structure and accessory items including,but not limited to,
the parking lot and landscaping shall be completed pursuant to the approved
site plan. Upon request for occupancy of the building, all uncompleted items
contained within the site plan shall be addressed pursuant to city code escrow
requirements.
2. Site Plan approval is contingent upon the rezoning of the property to R-4 PRD.
3. That the developer shall install separate water meters and water lines installed
for all irrigation systems.
4. That the developer modify the landscape plan to include the following elements
subject to approval of the City Planner:
1. Boulevard trees shall be planted every 50 ft along Sibley St. and 5" St.
E.
2. Two trees shall be placed in the front yard of 5 unit building along 5`h
Ramsey St.
5. That road and utility improvements for 4th St. E, 51h St. E, and Sibley St. must
be ordered before the issuance of building permits for this project.
6. That the shelter may be occupied before the road improvements are ordered.
7. That the developer w.:i'work with tht-�tPetto-JevV UY-1 LLilding flava that
compliment the surrounding neighborhoods.
8. That the developer shall be required to address all fire safety, building safety,
and accessability requirements for the use of the new and existing buildings as
part of the building plan review.
9. That the developer shall identify how and where waste storage shall be handled
on the site. Any outdoor dumpsters must be completely screened.
10. That parking requirements for this project must be met through one of the
following four options:
Option A- Accept the current proposed site plan with shared parking
allowed in the City's Public parking lot on 4`h St E.
Option B - Require the developer to provide off street parking in another
location within 400 ft of the apartment building.
Option C - Require the Developer to eliminate apartment units from the
project, if none of the other parking options are feasible.
11. That the developer shall increase the size of the playground area from the
current approximate size of 30' x 70'
12. That the developer shall add a loading/unloading area along Sibley Street for
the daycare and preschool use.
13. That the developer shall add a loading/unloading area along 4`h Street for the
daycare and preschool use.
6
14. Recommendation to the NRRC to evaluate park options in the area.
15. That other considerations be made for parking in the area, including assigned
parking spaces and residential parking permits for the neighborhood.
Upon vote taken, Ayes, 5; Nays, 1. Motion carried.
6. Updates and Other Business
Planner Weiland reminded the Commission and the public that a neighborhood meeting is scheduled
for August 3`d in the Community Room at City Hall regarding the Dakota County CDA proposed
family/senior townhomes. The meeting will be from 5:30 to 7:00 pm.
Applications have been received for the vacant Planning Commissioner position and interviews are
_ being set up at this time.
7. Adjournment
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 pm.
7
07/17/00 12:05 To:Oays Osbarg FrowCharyl Jacobson 612 423 1273 Page 2/2
Pleasant Ridge Townhomes
Average Income: $31,388
• Percentage of Working Families: 93% (27 of 29)
Examples of positions held by residents:
Working As Where
Stylist Hastings
Sales Associate Walmart- Hastings
Clinic Assistant River ValleyClinic-Hastings
Packer& Shipper Smeads-Hastings
Insurpnce Clerk St. Paul
-_s_ _N.l___ - - --
Auto Bo Painter I New Port
Legal Secretary Government Center-Hastings
Operation Manager St. Paul
Customer Service West Publishing- Eagan
Secretary Citv of Newport
Laborer Work Connection-Hastings
Laborer_. Intek-,Hastings
Support Assistant' Hastih s Middle School
Operator Specialist US Bank St. Paul
Program Assistant Farmington School District
Bookkeeper Title Com an -Hastings
Secreta ,:Y .Ea an . . I.
Cleanef i.' by p lHastin s
Sales Coordinator National Rod Ends- Mendota Heights
Shi "ir1 'Coordinator ASC-Eagan
Operation Manager St. Paul
70%of the residents are originally frofriMastings: The remaining come from
communities such as Cottage Grove, Ihver;GroVe Heights, South St. Paul,
Farmington, &Prescott
; t i
;
. uit
ii 1.fi•,P � r.i,;liinl;. l ( t.:-i I is - —
i. ;o•!. 1:;tI-UIF'f _ . ,;t. f'=a'il
INVER GROVE HEIGHTS Fred Stahl
YE GRO Public Safety Director
�N VF DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Phone: (651) 450-2525
HEIGHTS 8150 Barbara Avenue Emergency Dial 911
F Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 55077-3412 Fax: (651) 450-2543
f
AOLIG
July 26, 2000
Planning Commission
Hastings City Hall
101 East 4h Street
Hastings, MN 55033
Dear Planning Commission members,
I am writing in response to the R r%rert.B. T,ewis IT^. -nd znrie Ponr erR8 tbgf corn ^f
your citizens have expressed over their possible move to Hastings. The Lewis House has
had an Inver Grove Heights location for many years now. When we first received word
that they were opening a location in Inver Grove Heights we also had many concerns.
We had concerns about crime and our call-load going up, calls to the house resulting
from angry husbandstboyfriends, the effects that it would have on the neighborhood, and
on-and-on.
I am writing to inform you that we were extremely wrong in our initial concerns. We
have had a very positive relationship with the Robert B. Lewis I-louse and its' employees
for many years now. The initial apprehension and mistrust have been replaced with
friendly cooperation and respect. They have helped us out many times and hopefully
they have appreciated the help that we have given them. It has had no negative impact on
the neighborhood and has not increased our calls for service in that area. If anything, it
may have decreased problems in the neighborhood because of the extra-patrols that
police officers continue to do in that area.
In closing, I would like to say that we are sad to see the Robert B. Lewis House leave
Inver Grove Heights for another location. Because of circumstances beyond our control,
they have a need to relocate and our loss will be another's gain in this case. I would like
to encourage you to seriously consider all of the positive things that they would bring to
your community. If you do have any questions, please feel free to contact me and I
would be happy to discuss it with you.
Respectfully,
FREDRICK E. STAHL, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Lieutenant Chuck Klec
Patrol Commander
cc: Joelene Evenson
Battered Women's Shelter Standards:
A. Facility Standards.
1. Facility. The facility shall comply with all applicable codes,ordinances and licensing regulations of the state and/or local
jurisdiction in which the facility is located.
2. Policies. There shall be written policies and procedures regarding
a. Measures for securing the facility and its occupants;
b. Security of belongings for residents;
c. Provision of food for shelter residents. Programs shall ensure culturally appropriate food is available;
d. Provision of access for residents to clothing and personal hygiene items,including those which are culturally
appropriate;
e. Available laundry facilities at no charge to the residents;
f. Disaster plans and procedures,for meeting potential emergencies such as fire and severe weather,
g. Designated smoke-free and smoking common areas.
B. Program Standards-
1.
1. Shelter. Programs shall provide temporary emergency housing for battered women and their children.
2. General Advocacy. Programs shall provide assistance in meeting a battered woman's self-defined needs, through
a. General services which must include but are not limited to:a staffed office within the defined service area,24-
hour telephone access so that one telephone call enables a battered woman to speak directly to an advocate,
arrangements for emergency housing,transportation to safety,accompaniment to appointments as appropriate;
coordination of services provided by other agencies;and
b. Information and referral to resources which may include but are not limited to: child care,services for
children,income maintenance,legal services,food,clothing,medical services,transitional housing resources,
and social services.
3. Legal Advocacy. Programs shall provide assistance in pursuing civil,criminal and family court remedies.
4. Group Interaction. Programs shall provide regular,ongoing opportunities for group interaction/gatherings among battered
women through formal support groups and/or informal settings.
5. Safe Homes. If providing safe home services,programs shall screen and train safe home providers and use written agreements
outlining responsibilities of the program and safe home provider(s). Rules for safe home residents shall be provided to residents
in an accessible and understandable manner. Safe homes include any quarters used as a safe home,such as a hotel or motel.
6. Community Education and Professional Training. Programs shall assess the-community's training needs and schedule
training each year to meet some of the identified needs. Programs shall provide training to at least one of the following
audiences: community groups,schools,churches,legal,law enforcement,medical,mental health,social services,court
personnel,etc.
7. Orientation and Staff Development. Programs shall provide orientation for new employees,volunteers and board members as
well as ongoing opportunities for staff(paid and volunteer)development.
8. Systems Change. Programs shall improve the community's response to battered women and their children by assessing the
systems change needs in the area and developing a plan targeting at least one system such as schools,churches,legal,law
enforcement,medical,mental health,social services,courts,etc. Systems change includes such activities as influencing and
developing policies,procedures and practices,as well as community organizing.
A,C T.r?+
v r
Together Nye Make A Difference
05'f9n,
20730 Holyoke Avenue West • P.O.Boz 1256 • Lakeville,MN 55044-1256
(612)985-5300 TTY(612)98511077 • Faz(612)9854015
June 30,2000
Mayor Michael Warner
Hastings City Council
City Hall
101 East 4th,Street.
Hastings MN 55033
Dear Mayor Warner and City.Council Members:
I am pleased to correspond-to you in support of the proposed development of the Guardian Angels Property by Sherman
Associates.
Sherman Associates is proposing a development project that addresses many needs of the Hasting's Community—
affordable housing,child care/preschool,a community center and a shelter for battered women.
Community Action Council(CAC)is extremely grateful that Sherman Associates has agreed to donate the rectory
building to our agency for use as a battered women's shelter as part of their proposed project Over the past several
months we have been searching for a new site for our Lewis House Shelter which is currently located in Inver Grove
Heights. The project being proposed by Sherman Associates affords CAC the opportunity to utilize:the rectory building
to accommodate these needs,as well as enhancing our existing services to battered women,their children,and others in
the Hastings area In 1999 alone,we provided services to 435 individuals:from Hastings through our Lewis House
Shelters,our Domestic Violence Outreach Services and our Violence Prevention.Education presentations.
For over 20 years,CAC has provided quality Services to battered women and their children. The communities in which
our shelters are located have supported our work and have seen us as an asset to the neighborhoods.in which we are
located. CAC maintains highly secure facilities and local law enforcement agencies have expressed that neighbors in
areas surrounding our shelters benefit from our safe environment and our close relationship with their police
departments.
The City of Hastings and Dakota County will greatly benefit from this venture. There is an extreme need for affordable
housing throughout the metropolitan area and Sherman Associates is responding to this need The proposed housing'
would provide families,young professionals and other residents of Hastings.the ability to secure,such necessary
housing. An affordable daycare and a preschool,to be housed in the school building,would further enhance the quality
of life for the young families that are working and living in Hastings.
Residents of Hastings would also gain a community center from this project through the renovation of the existing
church building. Such a center could be.utilized by area schools,youth groups,civic organizations,and other agencies
to provide a space for children,teens and adults to come together for a variety of activities.' Community centers.are
known to.promote cohesiveness and civic involvement,provide positive activities for children and youth,and build
upon the strengd)s that exist within individual communities.
Sherman Associates has'designed.a project that will provide a variety of benefits to the City of Hastings, our agency,
and Dakota County. Community Action Council is in support of this project and the many ways in which it will enrich
this community:
Sincerely,
c;z
Mary Aj elene Evenson
President/CEO irector
Community Action-Council Violence Prevention and Intervention Services -
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
U'//YY/UU LU:94 YAA U1Kj"9:L10 a=AWAS a Aaav�inina kuVV0
CITY OF HASTINGS
1014th Street East•Hastings,MN 55033-1955
651-437-4127 •Pax: 651-437-7082
July 17, 2000
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
400 Sibley St, Ste 300
St. Paul,Minnesota 55101
The Hastings Heritage Preservation Commission(HPC)wishes to express its approval for
Sherman Associates' proposed redevelopment and use of the Guardian Angels buildings
and for the destp. of the new tnL.=�>',nuses�to!be<buitlt�on the property.
Guardian Angels church and school are prominent landmarks in the historic area of
Hastings.. The church represents the Catholic contribution to the community since 1868.
The school is a handsome design using materials such as copper, slate,brick and wood
floors and trim which would be very costly to duplicate. Historic preservation requires a
compatible.reuse for the build n& Sherman Associates willipgness•to take on the :--.
remodeling of these historic buildings is very welcome.
The HPC has reviewed the design of the new townhouses and finds them compatible with
the neighborhood in terms of size,materials and general design. The architecture reflects
the verticality of the nearby housing. The new construction will reflect the brick, stone
and clapboard used nearby.
We encourage MHFA to give the Sherman Associates proposal positive consideration for
these reasons as well as for the community benefits of affordable housing and related
services.
Yours truly,
--'!"I ITI it F'(1{ JTI4.1 lLol', of 0:F 1.'
01
(n i+n built o.1
of
l •:., r
Richard Thorsen
Chairman
r
. 1125dov on the Miasi Vo
VI/LI/VV LVLY !'liY V1iVVi Val- vauaavu[u. w [avwvV a[aauv YyVv-
i
CITY OF HASTINGS
101 4th street East•Hastings,MN 55033-1955
651-437-4127 •Fax: 651-437-7082
July 17, 2000
Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
400 Sibley St, Ste 300
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
The Hastings Housing and Redevelopment Authority supports the application of Sherman
Associates for the redevelopment of the GuardianAngels Block for affordable housing.
We commend Sherman Assoc ldtt for yropc:IZL this cam -retic. ive approach to
affordable housing and services supporting children and families. The HRA has actively
supported the preservation and reuse of historic properties and the redevelopment of the
downtown neighborhood fdr th*Jegii. This proposal is perfectly consistent with our
vision of a neighborhood with homes,jobs, shopping, recreation and access to transit.
The HRA encourages a-variety of inbow6 groups, family sizes and ages to make their
homes in this area, Within four blocks of the Guardian Angels Block are over 100
apartments and about the same number of single family houses, 3 blocks of shopping,
many employers- some with 50 to 100 employees,two banks,two elementary schools,
two parks and several churches. We are planning a transit center at the nearby depot. "
Sherman Associates asked the HRA to consider lending$100,500 to enhance the
appearance of the townhouses with face brick The neighbors asked that materials
compatible with the back school and stone church be used with some architectural
detailing from the neighborhood. At their meeting of July 13, 2000, the Commissioners
voted unanimously to make the loan to Sherman Associates at the appropriate time.
Yotius truly,
Cwt"'
V`j!
Clarence Soleim, Jr.
Chairman
,,._�r< lc �1'; 31fnJ7jijrtr,. �e� ;E•;f`tl
aasHnas oa the milowdPpi
• - ... - _ .•: ___�— - _ -- ;.iaL'rr:i°�...c�:�;.}•F.e-._c:•v a:.:F1a•.�ti: - ri-:�:i.:+M1:�� -�..
- - _ r- ,i-. `:I+Ct�-•+o-q •7i: _ - SS:_ m J. .:1t. =4.-.-1. .[: 4S.f.
.;�.v..'�+ _ >Ia'•yr: - _Y'• •.Jc'+G_'f�:•�^ :fv.'St., �Y_.prys,_.' _ - .:iy. "<�`^`y �y ,�(� +•::
n.J >...;.�:b`' ,i.- _i-::1'.•y_ c.. t...s•_:-'.c?'i-.n: ye• �: a'r,L�s �(`.i•.:"`.^: -•,�f.C:".; ..\'r1: '4 �=i 4.�•=�jSyl��. _ sgqi3 Wit•(•'4q+.,,c`��"F it� ;ti' $.y}�- zi•'t-I:S"_�Yt
-�^>' .•sl .Sti� .3:' .- -5r 1 . . .:J: _ _.,.. .v H •1 n:=' .J ..r=C.S c�T'-� fk`J.L'�
Z•i+ .: - .. .. ... ... v'J'- .- ._- '"l •_ •�-_-''-•:3•"ate=•. - x. �s �+ 1," �y a. -` �1.��
- '•f'`•-�/• .. .r-.P`::L `..•: ;•.:.g.�,..JY- '�w�..-..rLi7!%a.•r: ar_..x'...Y v'3:•S`=V•/• :!SJ�,:.?�Ff�`15"'y.
1 .
U
U
• b�4
Lim EM
EJLJ
® q
-- bJ) —
C
D Soulh Elevation �*
n frw -
n
I PM+A
YW� tiLN�
fW -Tqr
0 6
t I
® ', LU
a
.t
n
n
N
Norfh Elevation
w •.
N E[evatu
o
o
o � �
ti
PROJECT PROFORMA
Guardian Angels Black Redetielopment
USES OF FUNDS DATE_ 6/27/00
TOTAL USES OF FUNDS C$—G—,2 3-5 00,00
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Transitional Housing Grant M
000.0D
MARIF units(4) 000.00
C8DG 000,00
Hastings HRA 100500.00
Livable allss 000 00
Tax Credits 000,000 n^,:+ear? 1,64G.000 09
MHFA aRardauii ity loeniM ET Councg Housing Fund
MORTGAGE MHFA 3650 O.OD
TIF Supparted Mortgage 1,525000.00
TOTAL sou ROES OF FUNDS OD OOD.00
235 Do.00
INTEREST RATE
6.8096 AMORT. ".',30 years
MORTGAGE E AMOUNT 2025D00.00
ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE (combined); S15B,90p.00
DEBT SERV.DOVERAGE 1.15._ $2 760.00
VACANCY 7% 24 500.00
Reserves — 8,752.00
OPERATING EXPENSES (Rectory&Church) "91210 OPERATING EXPENSES
OPERATING EXPENSES Reductiontor'TIF rN00ME REQUIRED
PROFORMA INCOME
2 Townhouse 2 beds 0$683/mo $1b,39200
m
4 Townhouse 3 beds ®$789/ o
$37,872,001t,
8 2beds Apts. 0$583/mo 6 ,56800
8 1beds apts. 4W71/mo
4 2 beds apts.MARIF ®1$400/mo 16 00
2 Townhouse 2 beds @5835/mo 19 200.00
20 040,00
4 Townhouse 3 beds 0$925/ma 4,400-OD
Misc.Income;
0ayrare/preschool 4.50D.00
Shelter 13 60D UO
Community Center 2 000.00
TOTAL INCOME 36,650,00
354,938,00
Page 2 of 4
PROJECT COST STATEMENT
Guardian Angels Block Redevelopment
IN CATS `, DATA_ 6/27100
Remodel Sc oe1 Building 34000 a
Conahuc[ion l (20 units and Daycare/preschool)
I2 Townhouses 000 900.01)
Brick Vwnmn®Townhomes(Match Historic District) 1'2 000.00
Remodel Rectory (RObert Lewis House) l .00
Pathfinders 7. '000.00
Land 60 D0,00
Remodel Church (Community center) 800 000.00
Contingency 596 97 0.00
50 to
tlubiotal Dlrec[casts 00
llrch/E►Ig _' 0100
Su►"y `slsu oouo0
Legal Ms ;' 000.00
Insp.Arch_ a�. StDOD.OQ
AppralseJ. .00
4,000.00
Marketing i a rittliq 0.
Leasing ir.o-. 000,00
Interim In[roast
Underwriter i 0.00
Develapers Fee 80: ;00
Developers ProJectOverhead 6'n 0,0W..-;
Plan&Coordina tion Fees 00000 i
Perm Leen Fees 0 ,00000
Mart.Reglatratioa0D
TRIO Insurance 3r .00
Soli Tests 000,00
SYndicatlon/Tax Credit Sutunission Costs - P0000.00
Soft Cost Contingency 4% BO 0 :00
Inlereat on Contract 0,000:00-
Subtotal Indtract Casts X600:00
1 190100.00
OAP CTC S
5 500.00
Pegs l of 4
LO VU
x
4th Street East
U
J ~
4J
! Cantor
nowilty
Gaoler
int �
Apartment Existing c Q
Bu A •�...t Li
o%w.r�iewq Sheller ' a
1
a L7 d
y '
p
M +A.
__ AnfJ�uTv� /yryy
tiwve
II�IIr— !yy uaan.a
��bry•a• I
Apartment
12 5R
8-1 BR v1
5 Unite }�N.✓t `
Townhomes '
4 Unite 3 Units8-3 BR
a q-2 BR-
Total Units: 32
Parking y S
Garages: 15private
Surface: 36 Spaces
Street Blvd.: 28 spaces
5th Street East Total: 79 spaces Site Plan
n Site Man
Al r.aoa
Al
U
O
r--t
N
a b1J
EH ® ® ® ® ® ® ®EE EE ED PH EE
� o
•p.l .�.F'1"y KK u
-------------------
---- ---_--___------------- I -- _ aQi
i
nth Elevation Elevation
\J ltiltld
vi W
PM +A
AniYUM IIsWq
AV-. �0RI�1-yY
yy`I a1faRA
_ t a itea%mY1 W W(y
® EE ® ® ® ® ® ® n
�J ® ® ® ® EB
0 Ll0
North Elevation
1�.ma
n.. r
Elevation
.-Iv.
A2
ALLIANT
ENGINEERING
GUARDIAN ANGELS
BLOCK ' REDEVELOPMENT
r w.
.wwmr ru
HASTINGS, MINNESOTAfill
i I
fill I
Irn •rlla.T .�.T
PEP -
S S
-I �_1
Ts a St wp G + ma at Z
• St x >nn St Y o
w
T $1 W ]q al
III' 'WrE f .wyl'• ALLEY I I a sl w stn st Ivo
--� .
I . I �uuuaw peto�at w
V
r I v r I I VICINITY MAP a n w
SHEET IN c's u
1) COVER SHEET
a n. s lad.
.A.t 2) SITE PLAN
7) GRADING PLAN
4) U DLITY PLAN
PROPOSED SITE
1'.40' ww n w
wnor n e
un s.o rtnn-xo
oxo un
I C-0
wr s
t
ALLIANT
ENGINEERING
SEE PLAN NOTES:
.._9 ✓ I.xl OlOuncrs wx m rxx as ausx was
a.sow m xxOx[exxx elur,a Ir
- 4'f N 8 T R E E T E A S T molax slOva xmvn m rrrolas
� ••t 1/LL Cp9[I[CA w aNM.NYOR A
� 4• fM1t4x.WI LWtrYaxMx➢fI11/1 xW
I.Y.wLO.JOxf.
„mm.a. aw0as mx,u,xr.xx a001
:alc.rx xds]Csf x
66
dtLJ —_ I rrt.nu rrc.ma A / tif3 I BM wPROVE1.Bdi8;FCEND .snm.0
rrt-mx a aw I r anew anxx sj
I I I '� � i I � aadxrt xwt0on 1 j
I 1 I I I atismw 4 �;=t
rI — anxw.xa 2
I I o0snxo I I` I nc.m.n — I I I o wawYa waw ��_
ST,cuaenx�E I a wx0®emr sur fill.
Nal s[mx
I .,��, I I I I ---�
,� xmrxl.xar
I PROPOSED PAFKNb
.m.r 11:•naa0 �� nrtrx: "sw
I I
VACATE11) . ;.;> AI._L.EY .N MI.r�x�� s
I ..
® I W
W
K
--T 0
I
I W
a02
: �t 5
sr w
65 66
I s wn I � i s n � I rmxo.a
i
I _ x xl:aa•._ I _ r
fill
18 RaE E..I E A 8 T I' I wxxucsa �" wm
I Aa 110. OIM
• -- - -- - - - -- a :P as w
""`"mw Nom Ci-1
WIaI M
ALUANT
VAP(naimcE ENGINEERING
............
4TH 8 T R E E�TE A 8 TI
—M NY'w w
66 EROOMSCHEMLE iaMmmla—
it
7
4
Nal gym
P��E
E.'M
sy.ull,mia
z
VACAT I
0,
w
I I A I i 1—r 1 1 VLN 1 1,4/1 1 1 V1 11
I
z
z
WEEP
D
MMA
m 727.,
66 Im. 40
66
----5TH S ' REE _E X-8 T-- M'M
w My m w
rw C-2
-m' ALLIANT
>w:.a-ak ENGINEERING
�'V$:S A -fps a:�_a �✓ vI :it !. (4AICIp a 10OW1[M4 RY:!
' —'--d'T-H—'-S'T'R"E"E-T—'`E A'-S'T p a wa>r wx•art+m rwK rwnmoa
—I 66 ny I- - I �1 '^'� - 1�' I( ..-� '..a Q I I ujjj�Y
��— ♦
e 60 I —»� IMEID INb IO
------II YLLA >•''—Y /S I�-bSM4 ��� 14®>Y1M1'wY
i -•--->_—_ m>m arr>ra
I wn I EpSTWC BlRDa1E I � ') I 1I- wwY nlaW !
I i o 0KY>Yw>OYwr.( 1 ; I
I I ! In lr lr w I u ae:.a as ra ?i_
�'� w.K q mwo ran f
PM91 YGOIF I [ i
ITS I >
I I :� r� irz•hax a:'i�
o IR.}hM M h..K
—
�••a -_- ��—_•11' �I II[.laY'J-hffN KaY IF I W
YACATELI/. Y^ .\ ._.._I'- 11L.1_L.-1 MVlrq•IA.._.... ...;..�..-- .0 I p
r _ _
4-- iw
I _ Y
m I O
• J
Q I 91�J
IrVwRCI, 1 W
r I s
Iis
I I 1 I w ( I < 1
1 I iunal I t t sir i i I 1
s
66
—�I 1 S • �I__1 .tA_•' _-1---1-•—i ..� ...-_ _ --.1 t-._-__�—J OW,n la
> � .�- 6TH 8>_ R c �- ,_E.A 9 I.__->�—_. �`• > .n®.e .-.cee
an-x»! rri rw
t yy � IK O 11M
w w C-3
v:¢I r
I rnZu.s n�s.s / i
G) aoT r0 sGN.E O
Z PEFCIIAK RM1NlIN6 OEThM. I` ! 51!018 MNlllb OETALL — `.: .•� �••\\ , •� ww„� Ee
I IIOI T05GLE LI 1l7T TO 5L/1E '� I ` � �\..�� �� N aa. �•N L�
..+.�.en�...r..r.... rwr��rr •.� n www!w.6' N�oK W[ naT �^
71
w�
PM +A Ltd.
I..ur aalwv
'AIII..'��..rrr,�a..�i
arvrw.nr`—=r.rrw a.a.r w.n�YM •R$ �� )�i1 _ .'wA.r'�x�4C
.p.wcw Ny..�eY Porva.'
M9Ya.vw IW.sn onNly aa:.iee Nnue
rvaw»
':.xeroma nd�rw
Site Planting Plan
wrw...a.saay.r ws..mnwa. w�s�.�.
rr.
v: I.1
INFORMATIONAL MEMO
Date: August 3, 2000
To: !PGrainttReacquest
Councilmembers
From: a
Subject:
The Hastings Youth Athletic Association is requesting that staff apply for a grant from the
Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission/Minnesota Department of Children, Family Learning.
The application would be to develop a soccer field at Wallin Park. The City has already issued a
contract to grade and seed Wallin Park. If the HYAA is successful with the grant, the money that
the City has already allocated as well as some additional money from the HYAA wouly :rte-as
the match requirement.
Staff will continue to work with the HYAA in preparing the application, but final approval will be
requested from the Council at your meeting on Monday, August 21, 2000. If you have any
questions regarding the application, please contact me.
jt
1
Minnesota Amateur Sports CommISSIon/CFI.
Grant Program Summary
Announcing
The Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission (MASC)in conjunction with the Minnesota Department of Children,Family &
Learning(CFL)is offering a grant program to design,furnish,equip, renovate, replace or construct parks and recreation facili-
ties, school facilities and soccer fields.
Amount Available
$2,500,000 (two million five hundred thousand dollars) is available to be distributed between the eight congressional districts
by the MASC. Grants will range from$2,500, $5,000 to $100,000.
Who Can Annly
Government units such as school districts,cities and counties can apply. Nonprofit organizations such as soccer clubs are
encouraged to partner with local governments.
Eligible Expenses
Funds may be used to design,furnish, equip,renovate,replace or construct parks and recreation facilities, school facilities and
soccer fields. Operating expenses are n2l eligible for funding.
Selection Criteria
1..Geographic equity to all eight Minnesota congressional districts
2. Cost: Projects that develop the most facility for the least cost will be favored.
3. Organizational Capacity:
• The capacity of the applicant to proceed promptly with the improvement of the facility if funded.'
• The experience of the applicant in successfully developing and operating the program with the intent to operate the
facility.
• A plan to operate the program intended for the facility. A private,nonprofit organization that leases or manages the
facility must also demonstrate the ability and a plan to operate the program.
4. Fiscal Capacity:
• The availability and source of funds to pay the ongoing costs of the program(s).
• The availability and source of other funds to pay for the cost of acquisition or rehabilitation of the structure beyond
what this grant will provide and the ability to cover all expenses incurred before the end of the construction project.
• The extent to which the requested funds are to be used in conjunction with committed direct or in-kind contributions
from other public and/or private sector sources. Extent of commitment will be considered: fully committed,commit-
ted contingent upon receipt of state funds, or uncommitted.
5. Collaboration-The extent to which the application involves the local community in planning and implementation.
Collaborative efforts, family resources center models, and "one-stop" models that include more than one program will
receive favorable consideration. Written evidence of meaningful collaboration are recommended. General letters of sup-
port will be viewed favorably but will not carry as much weight as evidence of actual collaboration.
6. Preference must be given to:
• Youth in grades four through eight
• Provide equal access and programming for all children
• Grants that expand the number of children participating in enrichment programs or improve the quality or range of pro-
gram offerings.
• Grants that offer year-round programming.
• To school attendance areas with high concentrations of children eligible for free or reduced school lunch.
Match Requirement
Match requirement for soccer field development
Total project costs up to$20,000-match requirement 1:1 (total up to$10,000)
Total project costs$20,001475,000-match requirement 1:3 (total up to $25,000)
Total project costs over$75,001 - match requirement 1:4(total up to$100,000)
Match requirement for other sport facility development-match requirement 1:1. Applicants will have until September 15,
2000 to provide documentation of matching dollars.
DEADLINE: Applications must be postmarked by August 15,2000.
What other government rules apply?
• Projects must comply with Minnesota statutes 16B.335
• Any public owned facilities leased to nonpublic groups must be documented
• Must comply with ADA
Where can I get the complete information?
1. On the MASC web site at http://www.masc.state.mn.us/programs/masccfl
2. Call (612) 785-5631, and we will fax or send a complete RFP.
NEWS RELEASE
For immediate release: July 7, 2000
MINNESOTA Contact: Barclay Kruse,Associate Director
PiOONAMATESPORTS UR Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission
COMMISSION (763) 7$5-5634
1700 105th Ave N.E. Fax: (763) 785-5699
Blaine, MN 55449
Minnesota Amateur Sports commission Announces
New Grant Program
Blaine, Minn -- The Minnesota Amateur Sports Commission (MASC) announces that
$2.5 million in grant funds are being made available for amateur sports facilities and
athletic fields. While the new program applies to all sports, a special emphasis will be
given to the development of new soccer fields.
The new grant program is intended to fund proposals to design, fumish, equip, reno-
vate, or construct parks and recreation facilities including soccer fields and school facil-
ities to provide youth, with preference for youth in grades four through eight, with regu-
lar enrichment activities during non- school hours.
The deadline for application is August 15, 2000. All applicants must be a governmental
unit, such as a county, city, or school district.
Qualifying enrichment programs include athletic and recreational activities, academic
enrichment, homework assistance, computer and technology use, and arts and cultural
activities. The facilities must be fully available for programming sponsored by nonprofit
groups and community groups serving youth, or school, county, or city programs during
non-school times.
Grant applications will be evaluated by need, reasonableness of cost, ability of the
organization to administer the facility or program, fiscal capability to complete the pro-
ject, and collaboration with other community organizations to provide for multi-uses of
a facility. The grant program is a cooperation between the Minnesota Department of
Children, Families and Learning and the MASC.
For a copy of the RFP, please call the MASC at (763) 785-5631 or log onto the
MASC's web site at http://www.masc.state.mn.us/programs/masccfl.
City of Hastings
Building Department
Building Permit Detail Summary
July],2000 Through July 31,2000
Occupancy R-3
Class of Work: Add
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
2342 Add family Room 7/10/2000 Single Family 20,000
2396 Add family Room 7/25/2000 Single Family 45,000
2326 Addition 7/5/2000 Single Family 27,145
Totals for Class of Work: Add Number of Permits= 3 Total Valuation = 92,145
Class of Work: Remodel ,
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
2278 3 Season Porch/deck 7/3/2000 Single Family 10,000
2236 drywall basement area 7/5/2000 Single Family 500
2331 Finish Basement 7/6/2000 Single Family 8,000
2384 Finish Basement 7/19/2000 Single Family 6,000
2246 four season porch and deck 7/7/2000 Single Family 27,750
2411 Install Patio Door 7/28/2000 Single Family 800
2405 Install Windows 7/27/2000 Single Family 6,500
2370 Re-roof Existing Structure 7/17/2000 Single Family 3,350
2385 Re-side Existing Structure 7/19/2000 Single Family 1,500
2408 Re-side Existing Structure 7/27/2000 Single Family 3,500
2415 Re-side Existing Structure 7/31/2000 Single Family 10,500
Thursday,August 03,2000 Page 1 of 6
Class of Work: Remodel
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
2355 Remodel Existing Garage 7/13/2000 Single Family 1,460
2369 Replace Windows 7/17/2000 Single Family 4,905
2412 sheetrock dining room/replace 1 window 7/28/2000 Single Family 800
2324 Siding&Windows 7/5/2000 Single Family 13,900
Totals for Class of Work: Remodel Number of Permits = 15 Total Valuation = 99,465
Class of Work: New
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
2327 Deck 7/5/2000 Single Family 2,066
2325 Deck 7/5/2000 Single Family 2,400
2336 Deck 7/7/2000 Single Family 2,760
2315 Deck 7/14/2000 Deck 2,800
2378 Deck 7/18/2000 Single Family 3,000
2382 Deck 7/19/2000 Deck 1,077
2395 Deck 7/24/2000 Single Family 4,200
2360 Deck/Addn 7/17/2000 Single Family 6,000
2371 Decks 7/17/2000 Deck 2,000
2373 Decks 7/17/2000 Deck 2,000
2338 Fence 7/7/2000 Single Family 900
2388 Fence 7/21/2000 Single Family 400
2406 Fence 7/27/2000 Single Family 1,300
2274 Install Manufactured Home 7/3/2000 Manufactured Home 37,000
2298 Install Manufactured Home 7/3/2000 Manufactured Home 65,000
2362 Install Manufactured Home 7/17/2000 Manufactured Home 60,000
Thursday,August 03,1000 Page 2 of 6
Class of Work: New
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
2363 Install Manufactured Home 7/17/2000 Manufactured Home 50,000
- --- - --- ---- - — - -
2364 Install Manufactured Home 7/17/2000 Manufactured Home 55,000
2316 Place Modular Home 7/5/2000 Manufactured Home 66,000
2329 Plumbing 7/6/2000 Single Family 118
2337 Roof Repair/Shingle 7/7/2000 Single Family 2,785
2361 Roof Repair/Shingle 7/17/2000 Single Family 1,
000
2392 Roof Repair/Shingle 7/24/2000 Single Family 18,400
2243 Single Family Dwelling-partial finished basement 7/3/2000 Single Family 240,000
2299 Single Family Dwelling-finished basement 7/3/2000 Single Family 115,000
2311 Single Family Dwelling-finished basement 7/3/2000 Single Family 162,538
2280 Single Family Dwelling-finished basement 7/6/2000 Single Family 139,400
2403 Single Family Dwelling-finished basement 7/26/2000 Single Family 115,000
2281 Single Family Dwelling-unfinished basement 7/3/2000 Single Family 120,428
2302 Single Family Dwelling-unfinished basement 7/3/2000 Single Family 124,000
2303 Single Family Dwelling-unfinished basement 7/3/2000 Single Family 179,269
2309 Single Family Dwelling-unfinished basement 7/3/2000 Single Family 65,000
_._.__.__...... .._._._.....
2282 Single Family Dwelling-unfinished basement 7/3/2000 Single Family 173,432
2308 Single Family Dwelling-unfinished basement 7/5/2000 Single Family 65,000
2063 Single Family Dwelling-unfinished basement 7/8/2000 Single Family 203,310
2347 Single Family Dwelling-unfinished basement 7/11/2000 Single Family 160,000
2397 Single Family Dwelling-unfinished basement 7/25/2000 Single Family 210,000
2399 Single Family Dwelling-unfinished basement 7/25/2000 Single Family 183,000
Totals for Class of Work: New Number of Permits = 38 Total Valuation = 2,641,583
Thursday,August 03,2000 Page 3 of 6
Class of Work: Repair
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
- - -- .....
2334 Deck 7/6/2000 S'ngle Family 2,000
2335 Deck 7/7/2000 Single Family 5,000
2344 Re-roof Existing Structure 7/11/2000 Single Family 36,000
2353 Re-roof Existing Structure 7/12/2000 Single Family 3,700
2387 Re-roof Existing Structure 7/21/2000 Single Family 4,800
2389 Re-roof Existing Structure 7/21/2000 Single Family 3,000
2391 Re-roof Existing Structure 7/24/2000 Single Family 3,000
2401 Re-roof Existing Structure 7/26/2000 Single Family 5,900
2414 Re-roof Existing Structure 7/31/2000 Church 21,250
2328 Re-side Existing Structure/Windows 7/6/2000 Single Family 11,000
2341 Reroof 7/7/2000 Single Family 9,000
2383 Residing/Windowst 7/19/2000 Single Family 3,100
2356 sidewalk 7/13/2000 Single Family 900
Totals for Class of Work: Repair Number of Permits = 13 Total Valuation = 108,650
Class of Work: Alter
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
2339 Install Egress Window 7/7/2000 Single Family 250
Totals for Class of Work: Alter Number of Permits = I Total Valuation = 250
Totals for Occupancy: R-3 Number of Permits=70 Total Valuation — 2,942,093
Occupancy U-1
Thursday,August 03,2000 Page 4 of 6
i
Class of Work: New
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
2318 Fence 7/5/2000 Fence 7,312
2345 Fence 7/11/2000 Fence 3,144
2374 Fence 7/17/2000 Fence 3,000
2377 Fence 7/17/2000 Fence 1,000
-------------
2379 Fence 7/18/2000 Fence 675
2276 Garage 7/3/2000 Garage 7,000
2011 Garage 7/8/2000 Garage 6,811
.-
2359 Garage 7/14/2000 Garage 15,000
2376 Garage 7/17/2000 Garage 6,000
-
2386 Garage 7/19/2000 Garage 15,000
2404 Garage & Deck 7/26/2000 Garage 8,300
2366 Garage/Detached , 7/17/2000 Garage 13,000
2297 Shed 7/7/2000 Accessory Building 1,000
Totals for Class of Work: New Number of Permits= 13 Total Valuation = 87,242
Totals for Occupancy_ U-1 - Number of Permits=13 Total Valuation - - 87,242
Occupancy B
Class of Work: New
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
2402 Office Building 7/26/2000 Office Building 250,000
2410 Office Building 7/27/2000 Office Building 450,000
Totals for Class of Work: New Number of Permits= 2 Total Valuation = 700,000
Thursday,August 03,2000 Page 5 of 6
Totals for Occupancy: B Number of Permits=2 Total Valuation 700,000 J
Occupancy M
Class of Work: Alter
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
2332 Interior Remodel 7/6/2000 Mercantile 8,000
Totals for Class of Work: Alter Number of Permits= 1 Total Valuation= 8,000 l
Totals for Occupancy: M Number of Permits=1 Total Valuation 8,000 J
Occupancy
Class of Work:
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building Valuation
2313 7/19/2000
Totals for Class of Work: Number of Permits= I Total Valuation =
Totals for Occupancy: Number of Permits=1 Total Valuation
Grand Total ofAUPermits Issued: Number of Permits 87 Total Valuation = 397372335
Thursday,August 03,2000 Page 6 of 6
City of Hastings
Building Department
Building Permit Fees
July 1,2000 Through July 31,2000
Date Permit# Permit Fee Surcharge Plan Review Other Investigation SAC Fee Sewer Fee WAC Fee Meter Sales Tax
7/3/2000 2243 $1,777.75 $120.00 $1,155.54 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/3/2000 2274 $100.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 ;$605.00 $1,140.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/3/2000 2276 $139.25 $3.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/3/2000 2278 $181.25 $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/3/2000 2281 $1,108.15 $60.21 $720.30 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 '$605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/3/2000 2282 $1,404.97 $86.72 $913.23 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/3/2000 2298 $100.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/3/2000 2299 $1,077.75 $57.50 $700.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/3/2000 2302 $1,128.15 ' $62.00 $733.30 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/3/2000 2303 $1,437.66 $89.63 $934.48 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/3/2000 2309 $748.75 $32.50 $486.69 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $0.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/3/2000 2311 $1,343.96 $81.27 $873.58 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/5/2000 2236 $23.50 $0.25 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/5/2000 2308 $748.75 $32.50 $486.69 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $605.00 $0.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/5/2000 2316 $755.75 $33.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/5/2000 2318 $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/5/2000 2324 $235.85 $6.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/5/2000 2325 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
1/5/2000 2326 $412.91 $13.57 $268.39 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/5/2000 2327 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/6/2000 2280 $1,214.39 $69.70 $789.35 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 3605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
ThurwA y,Augast 03,2000 Page I of 5
City of Hastings
Building Department
Building Permit Fees
July 1,2000 Through July 31,2000
Date Permit# Permit Fee Surcharge Plan Review Other Investigation SAC Fee Sewer Fee WAC Fee Meter Sales Tax
7/6/2000 2328 $195.25 $5.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/6/2000 2329 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/6/2000 2331 $153.25 $4.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/6/2000 2332 $153.25 $4.00 $99.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/6/2000 2334 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/7/2000 2246 $419.03 $13.88 $272.37 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/7/2000 2297 $38.75 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/7/2000 2335 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/7/2000 2336 $50.00 ' $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/7/2000 2337 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/7/2000 2338 $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/7/2000 2339 $23.50 $0.13 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/7/2000 2341 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/8/2000 2011 $136.60 $3.41 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/8/2000 2063 $1,777.75 $120.00 $1,155.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $0""05.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/10/2000 2342 $321.25 $10.00 $208.81 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/11/2000 2344 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/11/2000 2345 $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7%11/2000 2347 $1,329.75 $80.00 $864.34 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 ;;605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/12/2000 2353 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/13/2000 2355 $52.78 $0.73 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Thursday,August 03,2000 Page 2 of 5
t
City of Hastings
Building Department
Building Permit Fees
July 1,2000 Through July 31,2000
Date Permit# Permit Fee Surcharge Plan Review Other Investigation SAC Fee Sewer Fee WAC Fee Meter Sales Tax
7/13/2000 2356 $35.70 $0.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/14/2000 2315 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/14/2000 2359 $251.25 $7.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2360 $150.25 $3.50 $81.41 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2361 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2362 $100.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2363 $100.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2364 $100.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2366 $223.25 ' $6.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2369 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2370 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2371 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 ,
7/17/2000 2373 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2374 $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2376 $125.25 $3.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/17/2000 2377 $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/18/2000 2378 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/18/2000 2379 $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/19/2000 2313 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/19/2000 2382 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/19/2000 2383 $84.65 $1.55 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Thursday,August 03,2000 Page 3 of 5
City of Hastings
Building Department
Building Permit Fees
July 1,2000 Through July 31,2000
Date Permit# Permit Fee Surcharge Plan Review Other Investigation SAC Fee Sewer Fee WAC Fee Meter Sales Tax
7/19/2000 2384 $125.25 $3.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/19/2000 2385 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/19/2000 2386 $251.25 $7.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/21/2000 2387 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/21/2000 2388 $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/21/2000 2389 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/24/2000 2391 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/24/2000 2392 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/24/2000 2395 $50.00 ! $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/25/2000 2396 $593.25 $22.50 $385.61 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/25/2000 2397 $1,609.75 $105.00 $1,046.34 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/25/2000 2399 $1,458.55 $91.50 $948.06 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/26/2000 2401 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/26/2000 2402 $1,833.75 $125.00 $1,191.94 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/26/2000 2403 $1,077.75 $57.50 $700.54 $0.00 $0.00 $1,080.00 $605.00 $1,140.00 $300.00 $19.50
7/26/2000 2404 $182.25 $3.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/27/2000 2405 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/27/2000 2406 $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/27/2000 2408 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/27/2000 2410 $2,953.75 $225.00 $1,919.94 $0.00 $0.00 $6,480.00 $3,630.00 $6,840.00 $740.00 $48.10
7/28/2000 2411 $32.65 $0.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Thursday,August 03,2000 Page 4 of 5
City of Hastings
Building Department
Building Permit Fees
July 1,2000 Through July 31,2000
Date Permit# Permit Fee Surcharge Plan Review Other Investigation SAC Fee Sewer Fee WAC Fee Meter Sales Tax
7/28/2000 2412 $32.65 $0.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/31/2000 2414 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/31/2000 2415 $50.00 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Totals: $31,381.15 $1,677.00 $16,935.52 $0.00 $0.00 $27,000.00 $15,125.00 $28,500.00 $5,540.00 $360.10
Grand Total of Building Related Fees Collected: $126,518.77
Thursday,August 03,2000 Page 5 of 5