HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-19-05
CITY OF HASTINGS
COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 PM
~onday,SepteD1ber19,2005
I. CALL TO ORDER:
II. ROLL CALL:
III. DETERMINATION OF QUORU~:
IV. APPROVAL OF ~INUTES:
Approve of Minutes of the Regular Meeting on September 6, 2005
V. COUNCIL ITE~S TO BE CONSIDERED:
VI. CONSENT AGENDA
The items on the Consent Agenda are to be acted upon by the City Council in a single motion. There will be no discussion
on these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the items will be removed from the Consent
Agenda to the appropriate Department for discussion.
1. Pay Bills as Audited
2. Pay Estimate # II-Project 2004-1: Westwood Area Reconstruction to Rivers
Construction ($12,956.69)
3. Pay Estimate #2-Project 2005-1: Dakota Hills to Pember Companies
($568,378.86)
4. Pay Estimate #2-Project 2005-2: Zweber Lane/Oak Ridge Drive to Pember
Companies ($113,278.93)
5. Authorize Execution of License to Encroach #2005-61 - 2310 Westview Drive -
Dan Owl
6. Approve Investigation for Potential "Quiet Zone" in Downtown Hastings
7. Approve Temporary Liquor License-DuGarels Bar & Grill on October 29, 2005
8. Resolution-2006 TRAC Management Report for MnDOT
9. Authorize Use of City Property and City Resources for Commercial Production
10. Approve Amendment to the Audit Policy
11. Approve Budget Adjustment-Parks and Recreation
12. Utility Billing Waiver of Penalty
13. Development Agreement #2005-57-Williams 3rd Addition (Whispering Lane)
14. Resolution-Approve Site Plan Modification #2005-50: Wal-Mart (1752 North
Frontage Road)
15. Resolution - Approve Renewal of Gambling for Hastings Lions Club
16. Approve 2005/2006 TRAC Drug & Alcohol Testing Policy
17. Resolution - Approve Massage License for Dwayne Collis
VII. AWARDING OF CONTRACTS AND PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Public Hearing-Ordinance Amendment #2005-59: R-2 Residential
Development Moratorium in Heart of Hastings
VIII. REPORTS FROM CITY STAFF
A. Public Works
Hastings, Minnesota
City Council Minutes
September 6, 2005
The City Council of the City of Hastings, Minnesota met in a regular meeting on
Tuesday, September 6,2005 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers at the Hastings City
Hall, 101 East 4th Street, Hastings, Minnesota.
Members Present: Mayor Werner, Councilmembers Hicks, Alongi, Hazlet,
Riveness, Schultz and Moratzka
Members Absent: None
Staff Members Present: City Administrator Dave Osberg
City Attorney Shawn Moynihan
Planning Director John Hinzman
Public Works Director Tom Montgomery
Parks & Recreation Director Barry Bernstein
Assistant City Administrator Melanie Mesko Lee
Approval of Minutes:
Mayor Werner asked if there were any corrections or additions to the minutes of
the regular meeting of Monday August 15,2005. Hearing none, the minutes were
approved as presented.
Council Items to Be Considered
City Administrator Osberg stated that a request by the SteLuTec Foundation to
reconsider their gambling permit has been made. Staff currently does not have enough
information from the State Gambling Control Board or other relevant agencies to
recommend that the item be added to the agenda. Councilmember Hicks stated that the
City should wait until adequate information has been received before considering this
item.
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Riveness to deny
the request by SteLuTec to be added to the agenda.
7 Ayes; Nays, none.
Consent Agenda
Councilmember Alongi requested that Item #7: Resolution-Approving a
Proposed 2006 HRA Special Tax Levy, be moved to #3 under Administration.
Moved by Councilmember Alongi, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to
approve the Consent Agenda as amended.
- City of Hastings September 6, 2005
City Council Minutes Page 2 of5
Pay Bills as Audited
1. Acceptance of Fire Grant Donation from the Metropolitan 911 Council
2. Acceptance of Donation from CF Industries for the Fire Department
3. Natural Resources and Recreation Commission Resignation
4. 1 st Reading and Schedule Public Hearing-Utility Ordinance Amendment
5. 2005 Budget Transfers and Adjustments
6. Res.-Selecting dates for the Year 2006 City Budget & Tax Levy Truth In
Taxation Public Hearing
7. Res.-Approving a Proposed 2006 HRA Special Tax Levy-moved to #3
under Administrator
8. Citizen Request for Waiver of Utility Billing Penalty
9. Auditing Services Request for Proposals
10. Res.-Final Plat #2005-57-Williams 3rd Addition (Whispering Lane)
11. Res.-Adopt Proposed 2006 City Property Tax Levy
12. I st Reading/Order Public Hearing-Ordinance Amendment #2005-54-
Landscape Ordinance
13. Res.-All Way STOP, Southview Dr. and Westview Dr. Intersection
14. Consent Agenda Item Excess Property Declaration-Police Dept.
15. Res.-Adopt Proposed Year 2006 City Budget
7 Ayes, Nays, None.
Copy of resolutions on file.
Resolution-8ummit Point Drive No Parking Request
Public Works Director Montgomery stated that a request from eleven property
owners on Summit Point Drive has been made for No Parking between the hours of7:00
a.m. and 3:30 p.m. on school days along Summit Point Drive between Glenlou Way and
4th Street West. Previously, the City Council prohibited parking on Glenlou Way during
the same time, and those students have begun to park on Summit Point Drive.
Mayor Werner questioned at what point will the requests for no parking in this
neighborhood will stop.
Councilmember Hicks stated that the Council should have supported a parking
prohibition during these hours for the entire neighborhood when initially approached with
the request this past spring.
Montgomery stated that initial proposal brought to the Council earlier this spring
was for the entire neighborhood, but that some residents on Summit Point Court did not
support the parking limits, so the Council approved No Parking on Glenlou Way only.
Councilmember Hazlet stated that it is the behavior and its impacts on the
neighborhood that is prompting this request for an expansion of the No Parking area.
Councilmember Riveness expressed support for the request before the City
Council.
Mayor Wemer requested that the City discuss the parking issue with the school
district to try to resolve this problem.
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Hazlet to prohibit
parking on Summit Point Drive between Glenlou Way and 4th Street West between the
hours of7:00 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. on school days. Staff was also directed to coordinate a
City of Hastings September 6, 2005
City Council Minutes Page 3 of5
meeting between the Planning Committee of the Council and representatives from the
school board to try to resolve this issue.
7 Ayes, Nays, None.
Copy of resolution on file.
Resolution-Variance #2005-56: Garage Size/Setback at 1302 Maple Street
(Schlosser)
Planning Director Hinzman stated that two variances are being requested: one for
a 10 foot variance to the 20 foot setback variance and another for a variance to enlarge a
garage to exceed the 1,000 square feet maximum. The Planning Commission and City
Staff both recommend approval of the setback variance and denial of the variance to
exceed the 1,000 square foot limit on detached garages because it does not meet the
hardship criteria.
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to
approve the 10 foot variance to the 20 foot setback requirement.
7 Ayes, Nays, None.
Copy of resolution on file.
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to deny
the variance to enlarge a detached garage to exceed 1,000 square feet with the findings of
fact outlined in the resolution.
7 Ayes, Nays, None.
Copy of resolution on file.
First Reading/Order Public Hearing-Ordinance Amendment #2005-59:
Residential Development Moratorium-R-2/Heart of Hastings
Planning Director Hinzman stated that the moratorium that would prohibit new
construction, additions, movement of existing structures within areas of the R-2 Zoning
District as identified in the adopted Design Guidelines for Original Hastings. This is
being requested to allow the City time to review amendments to bring the City code and
requirements consistent with the Design Guidelines.
Hinzman also stated that Council is being requested to include detached garages,
decks, and porches as part of the moratorium.
The Council discussed notification of this proposal to affected property owners.
Councilmember Alongi requested that lot splits be included as part of the
moratorium.
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to
amend the proposed moratorium to include garages, decks, porches and lot splits.
7 Ayes; Nays, none.
Moved by Councilmember Hicks, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to
approve the first reading as amended and order a public hearing on the moratorium for
Monday, September 19, 2005.
7 Ayes; Nays, none.
Approve Stormwater Plan-SUP #2005-23: ConAgra FloodwaU at 2005 Vermillion
Street (SACC Group)
. City of Hastings September 6, 2005
City Council Minutes Page 4 of 5
Planning Director Hinzman stated that Council is asked to approve the stormwater
management plan for the construction of the ConAgra floodwall at 2005 Vermillion
Street. Review of the plan was required as part of the Special Use Permit approval of
August 1, 2005. Staff recommends approval of the plan subject to the conditions of the
August 30, 2005 memorandum from the City's Engineering Consultant John Stewart.
Mayor Werner stated that other alternatives must be available and that he would
like the stormwater runoff to be reviewed more comprehensively.
Councilmember Hicks stated that approval for the floodwall has already been
given and that it would be improper to deny the plan at this point.
Councilmember Alongi stated that the report does not represent what the City has
requested.
Councilmember Moratzka stated that it is her understanding that the watershed
organization does not have a problem with the design of the floodwall or the stormwater
plan.
Councilmember Hazlet said that it was his understanding that the stormwater plan
was to address the entire site, not just by the floodwall.
Planning Director Hinzman stated that the floodwall construction project is not
increasing the impervious surface nor the flow of water on the site, thus a comprehensive
analysis is typically not required.
Councilmember Hicks stated that the site is not changing; a floodwall is being
added as a result of natural erosion on the site.
Councilmember Alongi stated that the erosion is a result of both natural and
manmade actions and he would support a review of the entire site.
Moved by Councilmember Moratzka, seconded by Councilmember Hicks to
approve the plan as presented.
2 Ayes, nays 5. Voting against: Mayor Werner, Councilmembers Alongi, Hazlet,
Riveness and Schultz. Motion denied.
Moved by Councilmember Alongi, seconded by Councilmember Hazlet to request
a stormwater management plan for the entire ConAgra site.
7 Ayes, nays, none.
Resolution-Approving the Joint Powers Agreement Establishing the Dakota
County Communications Center and Authorizing Appointments to the Board of
Directors, Executive Committee and Operations Committees
Moved by Councilmember Schultz, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to
approve the appointments as presented.
7 Ayes, nays, none.
Lions Park Parking Lot
Parks and Recreation Director Bernstein stated that City staff have been working
with Hope Lutheran Church, located on 5th Street to the north of Lions Park regarding a
request for a parking lot in Lions Park that the church will be able to use as it expands
and to fulfill its off-street parking requirement.
The NRRC has expressed an interest to proceed with the project, taking under
consideration the City's obligations regarding cost of construction, plowing, and other
issues. The NRRC approved the concept at its August 9, 2005 meeting. In addition, this
City of Hastings September 6, 2005
City Council Minutes Page 5 of 5
subject was discussed at a Parks and Recreation Committee of the Council meeting on
August 15, 2005, and the committee also supported the concept. Bernstein stated that a
formal agreement would be brought before the Council for formal approval once the
details have been worked out.
Mayor Wemer questioned whether the City is being too accommodating and
whether it is an appropriate site for a church to expand if they do not have the ability to
accommodate their own parking requirements.
Councilmember Hazlet stated that this concept appears to be a win/win situation
for both the church as well as the City and its park users.
Councilmember Riveness stated that the parking lot would help alleviate some
existing parking issues at Lions Park.
City Administrator Osberg stated that staff is requesting Council approval of this
concept prior to expending additional resources on a formal agreement.
Moved by Councilmember Alongi, seconded by Councilmember Hazlet to
approve the concept as presented.
7 Ayes, nays, none.
Resolution-Approving a Proposed 2006 HRA Special Tax Levy
Councilmember Alongi clarified that this is a renewal of an existing tax levy and
not an increase.
Moved by Councilmember Alongi, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to
approve the resolution as presented.
7 Ayes, nays, none.
Reports
City Administrator Osberg presented the City Council with a plaque from the
National Association of Counties that was given to the City of Hastings for participating
in the Dakota County High Performance Partnership Project.
Adjournment
Moved by Councilmember Schultz, seconded by Councilmember Riveness to
adjourn the meeting at 8:34 p.m.
7 Ayes, Nays, None.
Michael D. Werner Melanie Mesko Lee
Mayor City Clerk
Q1yof Hlrtigs
Nemtrd.m
To: City Council
From: Becky Kline, Finance Department
Date: 9/13/2005
The attached Department Report itemizes vouchers that were paid on
September 13, 2005.
Thank you.
Date: 09/13/2005 Time: OB:14:30 Operator: BECKY KLINE
Page: 1
CITY OF HASTINGS
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
MCES/FINANCE DEPARTM AUG SAC CHARGES/GARDNER -7,250.00
MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CASE 00138614701 & 00007 460.54
MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CASE 001435452601 23B.57
Total for Department 000 -6,550.89*
CITY CLERK U.S. POSTMASTER FALL NEWSLETTER 1,176.32
Total for Department 107 1,176.32*
FINANCE HASTINGS AREA CHAMBE JULY LODGING TAX 6,658.44
FINANCE WORK CONNECTION INC WK END B/2B KAISER 308.00
Total for Department 120 6,966.44*
MAINTENANCE GRAPHIC DESIGN BUS CARDS 68.16
MAINTENANCE LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 9.00
MAINTENANCE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT/ CH 20.11
Total for Department 140 97.27*
M.I.S. MATERIALS PROCESSING EQUIP RECYCLING 3B2.65
M.I.S. NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONES 133.55
M.I.S. SPRINT REPAIR PHONE/FAX LINE 200.00
M.I.S. UNITED PARCEL SERVIC EQUIP RETURN 50.10
Total for Department 160 766.30*
POLICE KDWA RADIO SAFETY MESSAGE 49.99
POLICE LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 1,201.00
POLICE OFFICE MAX - A BOISE OFFICE SUPPLIES 92 .18
POLICE UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM/ GALLAND 27.64
POLICE UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNI FORM/ MCMENOMY 32.54
Total for Department 201 1,403.35*
BUILDING AND INSPECT JACQUELINE MOES OVERPAY ON RENTAL LICENS 10.00
BUILDING AND INSPECT GRAPHIC DESIGN 15 STAMPS 268.81
BUILDING AND INSPECT GRAPHIC DESIGN CUSTOM STAMP 61. 72
BUILDING AND INSPECT LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 208.00
BUILDING AND INSPECT MCES/FINANCE DEPARTM AUG SAC CHARGES 21,605.00
Total for Department 230 22,153.53*
PUBLIC WORKS BOYER FORD TRUCKS BOLSTER 371. 09
PUBLIC WORKS BOYER FORD TRUCKS COVER/ D-2 58.50
PUBLIC WORKS BOYER FORD TRUCKS SUPPLIES 190.9B
PUBLIC WORKS COMMERCIAL ASPHALT C HOT MIX 4,B67.04
PUBLIC WORKS DOERER'S GENUINE PAR SUPPLIES 47.46
PUBLIC WORKS GERLACH SERVICE, INC. SWITCH 53.98
PUBLIC WORKS HASTINGS VEHICLE REG 2006 STERLING TRUCK/ TIT 3,766.34
PUBLIC WORKS LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 1,35B.00
PUBLIC WORKS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CABLES 3B.29
PUBLIC WORKS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FILTER 4.88
PUBLIC WORKS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FILTERS 152.39
PUBLIC WORKS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FLASHER 10.74
PUBLIC WORKS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FORMULA 4.04
PUBLIC WORKS NEXTEL COMMUNICATION WIRELESS CHARGES B30.BB
Date: 09/13/2005 Time: 08:14:30 Operator: BECKY KLINE
Page: 2
CITY OF HASTINGS
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
PUBLIC WORKS ROO EQUIPMENT / POWE SUPPLIES 337.23
PUBLIC WORKS UNIVERSITY OF MINNES BIRK & MEIER/ CONCRETE R 200.00
PUBLIC WORKS WERNER IMPLEMENT CO TIRES 149.33
Total for Department 300 12,441.17*
PARKS AND RECREATION LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 81. 00
Total for Department 401 81.00*
MISCELLANEOUS LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 23,273.00
MISCELLANEOUS MAGUIRE AGENCY PROF SERV/ 4TH QTR 3,200.00
Total for Department 600 26,473.00*
Total for Fund 101 65,007.49*
PARKS AND RECREATION CHEMSEARCH LUBE/ OIL 846.77
PARKS AND RECREATION CUSHMAN MOTORS REPAIR PARTS 62.31
PARKS AND RECREATION GRAPHIC DESIGN BUS CARDS/ PAUL & KEVIN 93.72
PARKS AND RECREATION LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 3,849.00
PARKS AND RECREATION MEYER COMPANY CERNOHOUS/ CLOTHING 243.97
PARKS AND RECREATION MN RECREATION /PARK FALL SOFTBALL/ REGISTRAT 120.00
PARKS AND RECREATION MTI DISTRIBUTING COM BELT 99.75
PARKS AND RECREATION MTI DISTRIBUTING COM PULLEY 197.94
PARKS AND RECREATION SPIRAL FENCE SKATE PARK FENCE REPAIR 302.50
PARKS AND RECREATION VERMILLION ELEVATOR LAWN MIX/ HERBICIDE 4,667.36
PARKS AND RECREATION WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN IN MOBILE OFFICE/ DOORS LES 316.25
PARKS AND RECREATION WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN IN MOBILE OFFICE/ FREIGHT 154.42
Total for Department 401 10,953.99*
Total for Fund 200 10,953.99*
PARKS AND RECREATION LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 3,165.00
PARKS AND RECREATION NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONE SERVICE 91. 08
PARKS AND RECREATION SHERWIN-WILLIAMS PAINT 397.49
PARKS AND RECREATION SPIRAL FENCE POOL FENCE REPAIR 2,334.00
Total for Department 401 5,987.57*
Total for Fund 201 5,987.57*
FIRE ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS PAGER REPAIR 212.18
FIRE LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 836.00
FIRE MEDICAL DISPOSAL SYS HAZ WASTE COLLECTION 69.13
FIRE WALMART COMMUNITY STATION SUPPLIES 542.96
FIRE WHITEWATER WIRELESS, REPAIR/ DISPATCH RADIO P 121.95
FIRE WHITEWATER WIRELESS, REPAIR/ OVERHEAD SPKR SY 735.25
Total for Department 210 2,517.47*
AMBULANCE BOUND TREE/NORTH AME MED SUPPLIES 711. 67
AMBULANCE INNERLINK TECHNOLOGY DATA CABLE 184.22
AMBULANCE LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 145.00
AMBULANCE MEDTRONIC PHYSIO-CON MEDICAL SUPPLIES 939.75
Date: 09/13/2005 Time: 08:14:30 Operator: BECKY KLINE
Page: 3
CITY OF HASTINGS
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
AMBULANCE MOORE MEDICAL CORP. MED SUPPLIES 265.22
AMBULANCE PAGE WOLFBERG & WIRT SCHULDT/ CONFERENCE FEE 280.00
AMBULANCE PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION OXYGEN 204.25
AMBULANCE WALMART COMMUNITY STATION SUPPLIES 61. 84
AMBULANCE WALMART COMMUNITY STATION SUPPLIES/ETREX L 1,850.49
Total for Department 220 4,642.44*
Total for Fund 213 7,159.91*
PARKS AND RECREATION BRAUN INTERTEC PROF SERV/ LAKE ISABEL 950.00
Total for Department 401 950.00*
Total for Fund 401 950.00*
PARKS AND RECREATION PAINTING BY NAKASONE 2ND PAYMENT/ CONTRACTED 1,377.00
Total for Department 401 1,377.00*
Total for Fund 403 1,377.00*
HOUSING AND REDEVELO GARDNER HOUSE LLC FACADE IMPROVEMENT GRANT 500.00
HOUSING AND REDEVELO LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 304.00
Total for Department 500 804.00*
Total for Fund 404 804.00*
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BARR ENGINEERING CO. IND PARK/ STORMWATER ENG 638.00
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT YAGGY COLBY ASSOCIAT IND PARK 7/ PLATTING & E 4,224.00
Total for Department 180 4,862.00*
Total for Fund 407 4,862.00*
PUBLIC WORKS BRIAN ERICKSON REFUND OVERPAY ON FINAL 83.85
PUBLIC WORKS PAUL VAN HORN REFUND OVERPAY ON FINAL 4.20
PUBLIC WORKS CHRISTIAN KERNO REFUND OVERPAY ON FINAL 94.81
PUBLIC WORKS STOTKO SPEEDLING CON WATER METER RETURNED 319.50
PUBLIC WORKS ATLAST ROOFING CO I REPAIR ROOF 200.00
PUBLIC WORKS AUTO VALUE HASTINGS BOOSTER PAC 163.03
PUBLIC WORKS BERRY COFFEE COFFEE 24.00
PUBLIC WORKS DOERER'S GENUINE PAR FILTER 14.05
PUBLIC WORKS LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 2,068.00
PUBLIC WORKS MOSENG, PATRICK DAVI KEY BLANKS/ SUPPLIES/ LA 57.33
PUBLIC WORKS MOSENG, PATRICK DAVI KEY BLANKS/LABOR 114 .17
PUBLIC WORKS NEXTEL COMMUNICATION PHONES/ ACCESSORIES 227.87
PUBLIC WORKS NEXTEL COMMUNICATION WIRELESS CHARGES 317.79
PUBLIC WORKS ZEE MEDICAL SERVICES MED SUPPLIES 196.45
Total for Department 300 3,885.05*
Total for Fund 600 3,885.05*
PUBLIC WORKS LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 4,253.00
Date: 09/13/2005 Time: 08:14:30 Operator: BECKY KLINE
Page: 4
CITY OF HASTINGS
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
Total for Department 300 4,253.00*
Total for Fund 601 4,253.00*
CITY CLERK LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 340.00
Total for Department 107 340.00*
Total for Fund 610 340.00*
PARKS AND RECREATION BECKER ARENA PRODUCT SHEET HDPE 242.19
PARKS AND RECREATION BUMPER TO BUMPER W BRAKE GREASE 5.52
PARKS AND RECREATION DALCO MOTOR/ 2 STAGE TANGETIAL 110.49
PARKS AND RECREATION DALCO PAPER SUPPLIES 413.70
PARKS AND RECREATION DOERER I S GENUINE PAR GREASE GUN 30.97
PARKS AND RECREATION GRAINGER, W.W. INC. RECIP SAW 200.33
PARKS AND RECREATION AMANDA TRUAX KOROBKO REIMBURSE ADVERTISING/SK 259.00
PARKS AND RECREATION LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 2,800.00
PARKS AND RECREATION MN DEPT/LABOR & INDU BOILER INSPECTION 10.00
PARKS AND RECREATION NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONE SERVICE 55.06
PARKS AND RECREATION R & R SPECIALITIES, LIFT BAR YOKE 321. 63
PARKS AND RECREATION SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CONCRETE SEALER 74.08
Total for Department 401 4,522.97*
Total for Fund 615 4,522.97*
PUBLIC WORKS GLENWOOD INGLEWOOD C COOLER RENTAL 7.46
PUBLIC WORKS LEAGUE/MN CITIES INS 4TH QTR PREMIUM 1,337.25
PUBLIC WORKS L & SELECTRIC REPAIR LABOR 595.50
Total for Department 300 1,940.21*
Total for Fund 620 1,940.21*
PLANNING TOM / CAROL SERRES LANDSCAPE REIMBURSEMENT 793.41
Total for Department 150 793.41*
Total for Fund 807 793.41*
Grand Total 112,836.60*
Date: 09/15/2005 Time: 12:00:13 Operator: BECKY KLINE
Page: 1
CITY OF HASTINGS
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
VI-I
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
COUNCIL AND MAYOR LEAGUE OF MN CITIES LMC MEMBERSHIP DUES/WERN 20.00
COUNCIL AND MAYOR LEAGUE OF MN CITIES MEMBERSHIP DUES 12,585.00
Total for Department 102 12,605.00*
ADMINISTRATION AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 18.01
ADMINISTRATION IDENTISYS ID BADGE EQUIP 8,071.94
ADMINISTRATION LASERSHARP, INC. TONER CARTRIDGE 83.07
ADMINISTRATION NEOPOST LEASING MAIL MACHINE RENTAL 233.58
ADMINISTRATION OFFICE MAX - A BOISE OFFICE SUPPLIES 365.06
ADMINISTRATION OFFICE MAX - A BOISE SUPLIES -183.23
ADMINISTRATION OFFICE MAX - A BOISE SUPPLIES 464.55
ADMINISTRATION OSBERG, DAVID M. LUNCH 1'1/ P HICKS 15.78
ADMINISTRATION OSBERG, DAVID M. PARKING APWA WORKSHOP 7.00
Total for Department 105 9,075.76*
FINANCE AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 4.64
FINANCE WORK CONNECTION INC WK END 9/4 KAISER 308.00
Total for Department 120 312.64*
MAINTENANCE AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 1. 72
MAINTENANCE DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- JULY DAKOTA CO FUEL MONT 25.51
MAINTENANCE DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSN ELECTRICITY/AUG 21.11
MAINTENANCE MUSKA ELECTRIC CO ELECTRICAL REPAIRS/ LD 265.65
Total for Department 140 313.99*
PLANNING AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 16.11
Total for Department 150 16.11 *
M.I.S. AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 12.48
M.I.S. DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- JULY DAKOTA CO FUEL MONT 24.23
M.LS. NORNES, STEPHANIE STATE ELECT BOARD LICENS 35.00
M.I.S. WOLF, KURT STATE ELECT BOARD LICENS 35.00
Total for Department 160 106.71*
POLICE AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 56.88
POLICE BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES VEHICLE MAINT 798.00
POLICE DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- AUG DAKOTA CO FUEL MONTH 2,843.89
POLICE DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- JULY DAKOTA CO FUEL MONT 3,173.89
POLICE DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSN ELECTRICITY/AUG 11.33
POLICE HASTINGS VETERINARY K-9 DOG FOOD 37.68
POLICE LEXIS NEXIS ONLINE RESEARCH MONTHLY 110.00
POLICE MOBILE VISION INC REPAIR / SQUAD VIDEO SYS 110.04
POLICE NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONE SERVICE 786.31
POLICE ON SITE SANITATION GUN RANGE SANITATION SER 97.75
POLICE ARCH WIRELESS PAGER LEASE 255.62
POLICE SCHARFE, VALERIE CONFERENCE FEES 65.00
Total for Department 201 8,346.39*
BUILDING AND INSPECT AT&T AUG LONG DI STANCE CHARGE 19.33
BUILDING AND INSPECT DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- AUG DAKOTA CO FUEL MONTH 264.94
BUILDING AND INSPECT DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- JULY DAKOTA CO FUEL MONT 346.72
Date: 09/15/2005 Time: 12: 00 : 13 Operator: BECKY KLINE
Page; 2
CITY OF HASTINGS
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
Total for Department 230 630.99*
PUBLIC WORKS ANDERSEN, E.F. & ASS BRACKETS/ SIGNS 1,473.36
PUBLIC WORKS ANDERSEN, E.F. & ASS SIGN PLATES/ POSTS 782.26
PUBLIC WORKS ANDERSEN, E.F. & ASS SIGNS 89.30
PUBLIC WORKS ANDERSEN, E.F. & ASS STREET SIGN PLATES 174.06
PUBLIC WORKS AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 19.78
PUBLIC WORKS DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS - AUG DAKOTA CO FUEL MONTH 3,847.99
PUBLIC WORKS DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- JULY DAKOTA CO FUEL MONT 2,742.01
PUBLIC WORKS DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSN ELECTRICITY/AUG 1,946.77
PUBLIC WORKS MEIER,TERRY CONFERENCE 7.75
PUBLIC WORKS PAGE, GREG CONFERENCE 55.50
PUBLIC WORKS SCHUTT, MARK CONFERENCE 41. 75
PUBLIC WORKS SEARS COMMMERCIAL ON FILTER/ SCREWDRIVER SET 39.37
PUBLIC WORKS TESSMAN SEED INC SEED 111.83
PUBLIC WORKS WINGFOOT COMMERCIAL REPAIR LABOR/ PARTS 188.27
PUBLI C WORKS WINGFooT COMMERCIAL TRADE IN TIRES -105.00
Total for Department 300 11,415.00*
Total for Fund 101 42,822.59*
PARKS AND RECREATION DAWN SHAVER SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION LORETTA DIEDE SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION ROBERT DAWSON SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION MICHAEL GRAHAM SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION MAUREEN QUAM SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION JIM OLESEN SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION SHARLENE NAGLE SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION ERIC SALEM SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION LISA REINARDY SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION JEFF LUCAS SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION SONA MURPHY SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION JOHN MATSCH SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION AMANDA WOODS SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION SUSAN BEER SKATE PARK PASS 15.00
PARKS AND RECREATION AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE .41
PARKS AND RECREATION DOERER'S GENUINE PAR FILTER RETURN -16.82
PARKS AND RECREATION GERLACH SERVICE,INC. TRIMMER LINE/ OIL 23.43
PARKS AND RECREATION MINNESOTA SPORTS FED SOFTBALL TEAM MEMBERSHIP 66.00
PARKS AND RECREATION MOTOR PARTS SERVICE EQUIP BINDER 106.48
PARKS AND RECREATION MOTOR PARTS SERVICE SPARK PLUGS 3.92
PARKS AND RECREATION TREE HOUSE SOD STAPLES/ SOD 17.99
PARKS AND RECREATION XCEL ENERGY ELECTRICITY/ AUG 2,225.02
Total for Department 401 2,636.43*
Total for Fund 200 2,636.43*
PARKS AND RECREATION AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 10.22
Total for Department 401 10.22*
Date: 09/15/2005 Time: 12:00:13 Operator: BECKY KLINE
Page: 3
CITY OF HASTINGS
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
Total for Fund 201 10.22*
CABLE HASTINGS ACCESS CORP ACCESS SUPPORT 45,000.00
Total for Department 420 45,000.00*
Total for Fund 206 45,000.00*
HERITAGE PRESERVATIO AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE .62
HERITAGE PRESERVATIO SMITH, CYNTHIA PRINTING DIGITAL PHOTOS 5.07
Total for Department 170 5.69*
Total for Fund 210 5.69*
FIRE AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 12.56
FIRE 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER DUES/ 2006 50.00
FIRE DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- AUG DAKOTA CO FUEL MONTH 604.80
FIRE DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- JULY DAKOTA CO FUEL MONT 767.73
FIRE DOERER'S GENUINE PAR SUPPLIES 235.43
FIRE EMERGENCY APPARATUS FIRE TRUCK 1482 REPAIRS 510.63
FIRE GREEN, THOMAS D DROP TANK/ REPLACEMENT 911.43
FIRE GROSSMAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS / TAHOE 1498 483.50
FIRE GROSSMAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS/ TAHOE 1499 483.50
FIRE MIDTOWN FOOD CENTER STATION COFFEE 59.43
FIRE MINNESOTA SHREDDING SHREDDING SERVICE 46.00
FIRE ORDERPOINT BOOKS 2006 CODE BOOK 90.41
Total for Department 210 4,255.42*
AMBULANCE BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES TIRE REPAIR 34.00
AMBULANCE DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- AUG DAKOTA CO FUEL MONTH 808.64
AMBULANCE DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- JULY DAKOTA CO FUEL MONT 743.21
AMBULANCE EMERGENCY APPARATUS AMB 1462 REPAIRS 119.47
AMBULANCE PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION OXYGEN 11 7.66
AMBULANCE REGINA MEDICAL CENTE AMBULANCE MEDICATIONS 200.59
Total for Department 220 2,023.57*
Total for Fund 213 6,278.99*
PARKS AND RECREATION POLARIS GROUP PROPOSED PUBLIC DOCK/ CO 4,593.16
Total for Department 401 4,593.16*
Total for Fund 401 4,593.16*
CITY CLERK INCODE / CMS DIVISIO CR2DIT MEMO -1,194.93
Total for Department 107 -1,194.93*
FINANCE INCODE / CMS DIVISIO UTILITY BILLING TRAINING 5,lS7.32
FINANCE INCODE / CMS DIVISIO UTILITY BILLING TRAINING 5,037.72
Total for Department 120 10,195.04*
Total for Fund 403 9,000.11*
Date: 09/15/2005 Time: 12: 00: 13 Operator: BECKY KLINE
Page: 4
CITY OF HASTINGS
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 5.65
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BDM CONSULTING ENGIN IND PARK #7 250.00
Total for Department 180 255.65*
Total for Fund 407 255.65*
PUBLIC WORKS THREE RIVERS CONSTRU PAY EST #11 12,956.69
Total for Department 300 12,956.69*
Total for Fund 494 12,956.69*
PUBLIC WORKS PEMBER EXCAVATING IN 2005-1 DAK HILLS 568,378.86
PUBLIC WORKS PEMBER EXCAVATING IN ZWEBER LANE 2005-2 113,278.93
Total for Department 300 681,657.79*
Total for Fund 495 681,657.79*
PUBLIC WORKS AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 11.40
PUBLIC WORKS DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- AUG DAKOTA CO FUEL MONTH 1,625.81
PUBLIC WORKS DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- JULY DAKOTA CO FUEL MONT 1,228.47
PUBLIC WORKS DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSN ELECTRICITY/AUG 40.26
PUBLIC WORKS ECOLAB PEST ELIM.DIV ODOR UNITS 13.31
PUBLIC WORKS GOPHER STATE ONE-CAL LOCATES 558.90
PUBLIC WORKS HASTINGS TIRE & AUTO TIRES 366.90
PUBLI C WORKS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FILTER 9.76
PUBLIC WORKS OTTO EXCAVATING, INC DEMOLITION WELL #1 8,365.00
PUBLIC WORKS PEINE MARK CONFERENCE 86.75
PUBLIC WORKS TWIN CITY WATER CLIN BACTERIA ANALYSIS 8/05 160.00
PUBLIC WORKS XCEL ENERGY ELECTRICITY/ AUG 11,791. 68
PUBLIC WORKS ZGODA, JOHN CONFERENCE 54.75
Total for Department 300 24,312.99*
Total for Fund 600 24,312.99*
PUBLIC WORKS COLT ELECTRIC INC. BREAKER 326.11
PUBLIC WORKS DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- AUG DAKOTA CO FUEL MONTH 373.38
PUBLIC WORKS DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- JULY DAKOTA CO FUEL MONT 46.78
PUBLIC WORKS DAKOTA ELECTRIC ASSN ELECTRICITY/AUG 116.30
PUBLIC WORKS MCES WASTEWATER 10/05 71,824.59
Total for Department 300 72,687.16*
Total for Fund 601 72,687.16*
CITY CLERK CHOICEPOINT SERVICES YOUNG/ PRE EMPLOYMENT 53.C8
CITY CLERK DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS- AUG DAKOTA CO FUEL MONTH 1,882.73
CITY CLERK DAKOTA COUNTY TREAS C;_.~Y DAKOTA CO r:;:::L MONT 1,6C7.
CITY CLERK HASTINGS TIRE & AUTO REPAIR TIRES 107. n
CITY CLERK HASTINGS BUS CO 8/10 BACKUP DRIVER 113.75
CITY CLERK HASTINGS BUS CO 8/11 BACKUP DRIVER 105.00
CITY CLERK HASTINGS BUS CO 8/12 BACKUP DRIVER 253.75
._.....-.~.
Date: 09/15/2005 Time: 12:00:14 Operator: BECKY KLINE
Page: 5
CITY OF HASTINGS
FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report
Department Vendor Name Description Amount
-------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------
CITY CLERK MN BODY & EQUIPMENT DOOR PLATE 25.59
CITY CLERK MN BODY & EQUIPMENT WIDE ANGLE MIRROR 74.16
CITY CLERK MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FILTER 33.18
CITY CLERK MOTOR PARTS SERVICE TOOLS 14.77
Total for Department 107 4,275.87*
Total for Fund 610 4,275.87*
PARKS AND RECREATION AT&T AUG LONG DISTANCE CHARGE 1.80
PARKS AND RECREATION ELLIOT, JEFF MILEAGE 218.25
PARKS AND RECREATION TOP SHELF ATHLETICS TAPE FOR RESALE 888.00
Total for Department 401 1,108.05*
Total for Fund 615 1,108.05*
PUBLIC WORKS XCEL ENERGY ELECTRICITY/ AUG 3,844.03
Total for Department 300 3,844.03*
Total for Fund 620 3,844.03*
PLANNING BDM CONSULTING ENGIN CONAGRA RETAINING WALL R 472.50
PLANNING BDM CONSULTING ENGIN DAK CTY JAIL EXPANSION 756.00
PLANNING BDM CONSULTING ENGIN DAKOTA SUMMIT 2ND ADD 125.00
PLANNING BDM CONSULTING ENGIN PRAIRIE RIDGE/CENTEX 490.00
PLANNING BDM CONSULTING ENGIN UBC 1,086.00
PLANNING BDM CONSULTING ENGIN WILLIAMS ADDN / MARKUSON 125.00
Total for Department 150 3,054.50*
Total for Fund 807 3,054.50*
Grand Total 914,499.92*
-..............-
September 19, 2005
Finance Dlrecto~r
t/~~
o~c . mbe . ~ Wet
~~-; ~ '1-
Co ilmem r
-.-."~-,.,.,.:_".",-~=,.,, -"",-.,., - ,""-= ~_"~._"'>C""'_'__"'''''''''''''''''''~_'''''''_'_>c:<<<,,,.,--,<,,,,.,_:,,,_:,,,>,,,0"
Request For Payment
Date: September 12, 2005 VI-2
Project: Westwood Area Reconstruction
Contractor: Three Rivers Construction
Request Number: 11
Payment Period: 8/1/2005 - 8/31/2005
""""'."'-''''~''''--'~- ,,>_,,,,,,.,___,,,_,,~_,,,,,,,,,",,_,__:,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,:.,,,,,,_,-w_,:.",,,,,:''''''''' ",,,,,,,,,,,,_,,,,,."__',,,,,_,~,,,,,,"',,.,.;-.-.<,,w:<<<<<""M'''<<W___''''~,., ~,=-"""""""""""""_""",_..=,,,,,,~_-,__"'",e<,,__''__<<_''-'-'''''''''''''''''''''''''''___:_'''"''''*''*''-''--'''''''''-'''':<<-'<<':'-_:'''''-'''''''_-''''''''''''''''.'''''''-'''''''""",,,,'''~A'''''","-.'",-
ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED
L This Period -j ~-To Date---:
~_ L-------~__...._____._________._.~..J
,--------, ,------- 1Th-~ I Quantity II-Amount---rQua-;'tity! [-A-Il1ount---J
LEnit J Lguantity I , Unit Price I
ff~"~~ &.~,~---_:"":'-'--":'---'":""---_.,,:~-,-,-,.,>,,,.,,
CLEARING (TREE) TREE 15 $618.00 0 $0.00 24 $14,832.00
GRUBBING (TREE) TREE 15 $103.00 0 $0.00 11 $1,133.00
REMOVE CONC CURB AND GUTTER LF 250 $2.00 0 $0.00 49 $98.00
REMOVE BIT CURB LF 500 $1.00 0 $0.00 13986 $13,986.00
REMOVE CONC SIDEW ALKlDRIVEW A Y SY 3625 $1.00 925.34 $925.34 1554.22 $1,554.22
MILL BIT PAVT SY 42100 $1.27 0 $0.00 40945 $52,000.15
.
TRANSPORT MILLINGS CY 1500 $4.50 0 $0.00 908 $4,086.00
REMOVE BIT PAVT SY 2500 $1.00 471.08 $471.08 1041.19 $1,041.19
COMMON EXC (EV) CY 15710 $4.00 0 $0.00 20254 $81,016.00
SUBGRADE EXC (EV) CY 3850 $4.00 254 $1,016.00 744 $2,976.00
TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 5950 $6.57 0 $0.00 689 $4,526.73
GRANULAR BORROW (LV) CY 5100 $6.30 0 $0.00 33.4 $210.42
AGG BASE CL 5 TON 18450 $7.55 0 $0.00 15193.19 $114,708.58
BIT MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 1950 $1.29 0 $0.00 2552 $3,292.08
BIT WEAR COURSE (LV 4) DRIVEWAY SY 2250 $13.13 0 $0.00 615.65 $8,083.48
BIT WEAR COURSE (MV 3) STREET TON 4450 $29.77 0 $0.00 4436.8 $132,083.54
BIT NON WEAR COURSE (MV 3) STREET TON 4900 $28.58 0 $0.00 4936.57 $141,087.17
CONC CURB AND GUTTER B618 LF 23200 $7.88 0 $0.00 21545 $169,774.60
ADJUST EX FRAME AND RING CASTINGS EA 5 $314.25 0 $0.00 6 $1,885.50
ADJUST EX GV BOX EA 6 $138.33 0 $0.00 9 $1,244.97
4" CONC WALK SF 400 $3.25 0 $0.00 152.82 $496.67
6" CONC DRIVEWAY PAVT (SY) SY _ 6175 $29.72 0 $0.00 3608.16 $107,234.52
SILT FENCE LF 100 $4.12 0 $0.00 200 $824.00
-,~ ~
Page 1 of 6
>>>>:< ,..,..;<<- ".-,-=.,...,---,.",...._,."",,
ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED
I This Period ! LU To Date -l
1-- Unit --ll Q~antity-1IUnit Price I I Quantity II Amount II QuantitYl r ... Amount---=i
INLET PROTECTION (FILTER AGG) EA 61 $100.00 0 $0.00 30 $3,000.00
EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $2,575.00 0 $0.00 1 $2,575.00
SOD SY 40950 $2.71 0 $0.00 21995.25 $59,607.13
SEED LB 10 $103.00 0 $0.00 8 $824.00
BUR OAK 2" TO 2-1/2" B&B EA 10 $267.80 4 $1,071.20 4 $1,071.20
BLACK ASH 2" TO 2-1/2" B&B EA 10 $257.50 0 $0.00 3 $772.50
AUTUMN BLAZE 2" TO 2-1/2" B&B EA 10 $267.80 0 $0.00 11 $2,945.80
COMMON HACKBERRY 2" TO 2-1/2" B&B EA 10 $260.59 0 $0.00 4 $1,042.36
GLENLEVEN LINDEN 2" TO 2-1/2" B&B EA 10 $260.59 0 $0.00 1 $260.59
CONNECT TO EX MH EA 2 $1,314.13 0 $0.00 3 $3,942.39
CONNECT TO EX SAN SEWER EA 4 $589.88 0 $0.00 10 $5,898.80
4" ON 8" PVC WYE EA 170 $29.16 0 $0.00 170 $4,957.20
4" ON 10" PVC WYE EA 43 $69.96 0 $0.00 36 $2,518.56
4" PVC SDR 26 (FOR SERVICES) LF 6900 $11.07 0 $0.00 4168.5 $46,145.30
FILL AND ABANDON EX SAN SEWER/FORCEMAIN LF 1440 $1.79 0 $0.00 1768 $3,164.72
6" DIP CL 52 FORCEMAIN W/ FITTINGS LF 40 $35.15 0 $0.00 97.1 $3,413.07
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (0-10' DEPTH) LF 2300 $15.20 0 $0.00 3631 $55,191.20
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (10-12' DEPTH) LF 3600 $16.80 0 $0.00 3220 $54,096.00
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (12-14' DEPTH) LF 3090 $18.95 0 $0.00 1844 $34,943.80
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (14-16' DEPTH) LF 280 $23.95 0 $0.00 70 $1,676.50
8" OUTSIDE DROP LF 5 $240.69 0 $0.00 10.1 $2,430.97
8" DIP SAN SEWER (ALL DEPTHS) LF 20 $38.60 0 $0.00 40 $1,544.00
10" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (0-10' DEPTH) LF 450 $16.86 0 $0.00 220 $3,709.20
10" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (10'-12' DEPTH) LF 550 $18.47 0 $0.00 469 $8,662.43
10" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (12'-14' DEPTH) LF 1070 $20.61 0 $0.00 1115 $22,980.15
10" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (14'-16' DEPTH) LF 90 $30.61 0 $0.00 90 $2,754.90
10" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (16'-18' DEPTH) LF 10 $30.61 0 $0.00 10 $306.10
2" THICK 4' X 8' INSULATION SHEET SHEET 190 $32.71 0 $0.00 29 $948.59
REMOVE EX SSMH EA 46 $300.00 0 $0.00 38 $11,400.00
48" DIA SSMH EA 47 $1,750.37 0 $0.00 47 $82,267.39
EXTRA DEPTH MH OVER 10' LF 142 $88.16 9.5 $837.52 94.15 $8,300.26
TELEVISE SAN SEWER 11400 $0.62 0 $0.00 6107.1 $3,786.40
.li___>.<<.w;,,;_~_~;i~:::~"""~~~~_~>i<~~ .....!:lt~~--._<>>_!!,,:""_:>i<~.,. ~ r ~~1 "';'_"o/;-'~"'~"W_:AA_~_~,__
Page 2 of 6
'..:<<_* <<':<<-<.",...._;-,>>~'''-,_:<<''''',;",:.,,'-,,=,-<,'_-.~-~ k.' ....--..,"'''''*''''*''~_."...'''___...........
ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED
I This Period ii---To Date I
'L ..
1--- Unit~ I Q~~tity J [Unit Price I I Quantity II Amount II QuantitY] L --
Amount i
CONNECT TO EX WM EA 7 $699.38 0 $0.00 9 $6.294.42
REMOVE EXHYDANDGV EA 20 $150.00 0 $0.00 20 $3,000.00
REMOVE EX GV EA 27 $100.00 0 $0.00 20 $2.000.00
REMOVE EX WM LF 9640 $2.00 341 $682.00 12011 $24,022.00
6" DIP CL 52 WI FITTINGS LF 340 $20.40 0 $0.00 366.7 $7.480.68
8" DIP CL 52 WI FITTINGS LF 11655 $21.60 0 $0.00 11485 $248,076.00
8" GV AND BOX EA 23 $791.10 0 $0.00 30 $23.733.00
8" LIVE TAP ON EX 12" WM EA 2 $2.106.08 0 $0.00 1 $2.106.08
1" TYPE K COPPER WI FITTINGS LF 6470 $12.34 0 $0.00 6119.7 $75.517.10
1" CORP STOP EA 209 $26.13 0 $0.00 209 $5.461.17
ABANDON EX CURB STOP BOX EA 27 $300.00 0 $0.00 10 $3.000.00
1" CURB STOP AND BOX EA 176 $65.72 0 $0.00 209 $13.735.48
CURB STOP COVER CASTING EA 11 $158.17 0 $0.00 7 $1.107.19
HYD 7.5' BURY WI GV EA 20 $2.370.20 0 $0.00 20 $47.404.00
6" HYD EXTENSION EA 6 $326.97 0 $0.00 1 $326.97
12" HYD EXTENSION EA 5 $367.44 0 $0.00 1 $367.44
REMOVE EX STORM SEWER LF 5350 $5.00 76 $380.00 5123 $25.615.00
15" RCP DES 3006 CL III LF 1634 $30.63 0 $0.00 1637 $50.141.31
18" RCP DES 3006 CL III LF 1244 $32.65 32 $1,044.80 1376 $44,926.40
21" RCP DES 3006 CL III WI BENDS LF 66 $34.48 0 $0.00 60 $2.068.80
24" RCP DES 3006 CL III LF 520 $30.68 0 $0.00 523 $16.045.64
30" RCP DES 3006 CL III LF 270 $41.70 0 $0.00 269 $11,217.30
36" RCP DES 3006 CL III WI BENDS LF 415 $57.91 0 $0.00 410 $23,743.10
54" RCP DES 3006 CL III LF 485 $105.38 56 $5.901.28 486 $51.214.68
54" RCP LONG RADIUS BEND, 7.5 DEG. EA 2 $978.24 0 $0.00 3 $2,934.72
26-5/8" X 43-3/4" RCP ARCH PIPE LF 420 $73.45 0 $0.00 354 $26.001.30
36" X 58-1/2" RCP ARCH PIPE WI BENDS LF 360 $104.33 0 $0.00 401 $41.836.33
45" X 73" RCP ARCH PIPE CL III WI BENDS LF 360 $139.82 0 $0.00 339 $47.398.98
54" X 88" RCP ARCH PIPE CL III LF 1300 $160.00 0 $0.00 1302 $208.320.00
62" X 102" RCP ARCH PIPE CL III LF 290 $222.00 0 $0.00 208 $46,176.00
REMOVE EX DRAINAGE STRUCTURE EA 63 $300.00 1 $300.00 57 $17.100.00
CONST DOUBLE BUNCHED CATCH BASINS EA 14 $2,409.90 0 $0.00 13 $31.328.70
_""_~___MO_;_""_~**_)< ';<t'l' rT _'~~J.~ ~"'"~"*'-""~- ~-~~=:';""'"-_:":<>"".--...."".,:,;~,*-,::-""
Page 3 of 6
"",.>- "----->>>"-""=<<-,.,._/,"'-,-"-",''''--,'''-~<<<<,''''''-,.'..,, ""-"""",,.,..., -~"_~__^'<00'______ Xw.<<<<<,_'_""'-''''''''"_;'''''''''<<_~'''''''__'''':''''''''''''''''''''~~''''''''''''''''''''''''''N''''-''_>>>:_>-'''___""->:."__"..,:,=-,<-=".x._*"..._"""__~"':"/."_:"""'_'_',,,,,_,:<,>>:-;.x.,.,,,,,,:.;,.:,
ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED
1- -.----..--~---, ,...-- ..-------..----.---
i This Period ! L____To Dat~ I
["Unit j [QuantitYl ! Unit Price I I Quantity II Amount J[Quantityl L . Amount -J
I
J
-- ,,__~,"""'~"'.;'ll_~.;" x_,_",^_':'>"<=-d'M<"", ",.~::_"._"""":i_~_';('~""""'_'" -;-~"",,:;~:"~""',"'f""- ~-,,~,
CaNST TRIPLE BUNCHED CATCH BASINS EA 4 $3,682.04 0 $0.00 4 $14,728.16
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-48 EA 29 $1,568.60 0 $0.00 33 $51,763.80
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-60 EA 6 $2,282.31 0 $0.00 6 $13,693.86
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-66 EA 1 $2,658.77 0 $0.00 1 $2,658.77
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-72 EA 4 $2,749.32 0 $0.00 4 $10,997.28
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 4020-78 EA 1 $3,625.32 0 $0.00 2 $7,250.64
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-96 EA 1 $5,409.27 0 $0.00 2 $10,818.54
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 4020-102 EA 4 $5,525.06 0 $0.00 3 $16,575.18
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 4020-120 EA 7 $10,279.05 0 $0.00 7 $71,953.35
CaNST SPECIAL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE #1 LS 1 $34,712.17 0 $0.00 1 $34,712.17
CaNST SPECIAL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE #2 LS 1 $46,234.00 0 $0.00 1 $46,234.00
CaNST SPECIAL DRAINAGE STRUCTURE #3 LS 1 $44,168.46 0 $0.00 1 $44,168.46
CaNST HEADWALL STRUCTURE LS 1 $44,407.96 0 $0.00 1 $44,407.96
OUTLET FLAP GATE (STEEL) LS 1 $26,294.50 0 $0.00 1 $26,294.50
RIPRAP (ALL SIZES) (LS) LS 50 $33.62 0 $0.00 74.6 $2,508.05
GEOTEXTILE FILTER MATERIAL TYPE IV SY 200 $1.60 0 $0.00 67 $107.20
TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $5,047.00 0.2 $1,009.40 1 $5,047.00
CONSTRUCT & REMOVE TEMP WM LF 1200 $8.00 0 $0.00 620 $4,960.00
MOBILIZATION LS 1 $3,000.00 0 $0.00 1 $3,000.00
REPLACE EXISTING TRANSITE SS SERVICE EA 9 $1,200.00 0 $0.00 9 $10,800.00
__.."^"m~~...m"__"~_,,,,,,,,__,,,,,,,.,.'''_',,'''~_''~''n''''~,"_~_'"'_mm,,_'~_""M","_W"''''~'_~_'_ w'~"",,"m"~_ """'.."~_ ..n" $2,827,690:03
Subtotal 3,638.62
- ~",,_"I)J: --""~
Page 4 of 6
City of Hastings
Westwood Area Reconstruction
Application for Payment Number: 11
Period Ending: 8/31/2005
Contractor: Three Rivers Construction
15001 Hudson Road POBox 206
Lakeland, MN 55043
___.,________u ___+_________._. _._____.__ ______u______ _____u_______..__.________________~____u_________________-------.--~------------- ______________H__+___n______ ..___.___
Contractor Date
_.,---~-_..._- .._-~-_..._~---- .-..-_.-
Engineer Date
-------
Approved by: Owner Date
~ r T ~""""'_~:~.C$I..;<..~'w_~"""''"M'''____~:m:WAA~__,.. ~H ~ 'ij:. #>'_;.r .3.<>" ':"*",,,~ -- i ~~~~~_;l~..;;_'~'_,,_~_:::::~.. ~""';~::~~"">iil;W"
Page 5 of 6
PAYMENT SUMMARY:
~ay E~~~________ Period Retainage Payment
1 5/1/2004 - 6/30/2004 $0.00 $161,383.48
2 7/1/2004 - 7/30/2004 $0.00 $748,059.19
3 8/1/2004 - 8/31/2004 $0.00 $540,787.88
4 9/1/2004 - 9/30/2004 $2.103.54 $172,605.91
5 10/1/2004 - 10/31/2004 $22,648.41 $430,319.79
6 11/1/2004 . 11/30/2004 $20,043.34 $380.823.45
7 3/1/2005 . 3/31/2005 $926.43 $17,602.08
8 4/1/2005 - 5/31/2005 $7,215.69 $137,098.14
9 5/27/2005 - 6/5/2005 $6,192.98 $117,666.64
10 6/1/2005 - 6/30/2005 $2,428.72 $46,145.73
11 8/1/2005 - 8/31/2005 $681.93 $12,956.69
TOTALS TO DATE: I $62,241.04 $2,765,448.98 I
Total Completed To Date $2,827.690.03
Less Retainage: $62,241.04
Less Previous Payment: $2,752,492.29
Total Amount Due: $12.956.fil!r
~=- ~~ _.~--'~-i>~~~:'",,>;:;m,_,'~:=_:*''''''''''''~'':'''''''' ~ \-*""~""'fr"l(r ~m~~""'_'_:l~:m""',,~:=== w'<< <=>.v..,':O<l't<
Page 6 of 6
<<=<<<<-",,<<=< '*"--''''.,''=....'-<<<*'',<<--'''~''':._,_.~.;.>;".:."=-'''''->,-- _,-<<<<'''''~<<<<<_.,..-.<<-,_,...-.->__,_..:.x<.,_~__.,.''''_:.:.>:.,:_>>-=--,,:_",<.,,>:,_,,.:,,<<,,,.,,,<._,_:__",,,,,,,,,*,,,-~_,,_<.,....,
Request For Payment
Date: September 13, 2005 VI-3
Project: DAKOTA HILLS AREA IMPROV
Contractor: Pember Excavating Company
Request Number: 2
Payment Period: 8/1/2005 - 8/31/2005
.".=-,,>,--, """_",_""~,_<,:,,,,:,:,,,:,,_:,,_,,,,_,,__,,,,,,,:_~~_"","O"":'''''''.M'':'''''''X''':W'':<<OX<<'~'',,,,->,",,_,,,,,,,,,,,/,<<-;,>;,,,,,,_,,,,,:,,,,,,,<<"""*<'_-'-"<<_"'__,'l<<_;.vN_:.'''''-,'_'_'l<<':':''"""",''''''':<<<<<<,,*,,,_;'>;<'''''''''''''''_"""-",,,x,,_,,'__~_'=--_'W""_'__:'M"'->_''''''_'''''''.''_'''''''.m'0:"'~'""",.:.,.--"<<.:_.,...:._,,,<<.-.-.-,
ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED
L This Peri~d--_l [==-__!~ ~~~~e~==~=-J
1--- --------------, c-----------. ,--~----------, ,--------- ::-:li -I 1<).-----1 r--------n~
I Unit i i Quantity i l Unit Price i I Quantity J i Amount I Quantity I ~mount .J
C'::_ ',<<;<"''''.''0l~''''''''''''<'_'''''W''*''_>>'''''::'W::"___:::,*,,*~:''''''''''''4~':::::'W'_~-..:;,.."Y/_'::"':::_;"',;,"<<<
REMOVE CONC CURB AND GUTTER LF 13200 $3.50 1165 $4,077.50 9750 $34,125.00
REMOVE BIT CURB LF 15600 $2.00 2535 $5,070.00 7790 $15,580.00
REMOVE CONC SIDEW ALK/DRIVEW A Y SY 2655 $4.50 1060 $4,770.00 1239 $5,575.50
MILL BIT PAVT SY 53190 $1_62 7550 $12,231.00 36250 $58,725.00
REMOVE BIT PAVT SY 2310 $3.00 812 $2,436.00 935 $2,805.00
COMMON EXC (EV) CY 21030 $6.00 4880 $29,280.00 10440 $62,640.00
COMMON EXC (TRAIL) (EV) CY 1050 $7.00 615 $4,305.00 615 $4,305.00
SUBGRADE EXC (EV) CY 3825 $8.00 42 $336.00 262 $2,096.00
TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 3880 $16.17 419 $6,775.23 419 $6,775.23
GRANULAR BORROW (LV) CY 4675 $3.00 0 $0.00 15 $45.00
AGG BASE CL 5 (STREET) TON 23000 $10.00 6773 $67,730.00 18128 $181,280.00
BIT MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 2540 $2.30 100 $230.00 100 $230.00
BIT NON WEAR COURSE (MV 3) STREET TON 6435 $28.76 3466 $99,682.16 3466 $99,682.16
CONC CURB & GUTTER B618 LF 30125 $8.10 6861 $55,574.10 15446 $125,112.60
4" CONC WALK SF 8200 $3.40 95 $323.00 95 $323.00
6" CONC DRIVEWAY PAVT (SY) SY 3495 $34.87 1733 $60,429.71 1970 $68,693.90
CHIMNEY SEAL EA 83 $290.00 8 $2,320.00 18 $5,220.00
SALVAGE & REINSTALL EX CASTING EA 83 $50.00 5 $250.00 15 $750.00
REPLACE EX STORM SEWER CASTING EA 21 $200.00 5 $1,000.00 5 $1,000.00
EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $2,500.00 0.2 $500.00 0.2 $500.00
SIL T FENCE LF 500 $2.50 30 $75.00 295 $737.50
INLET PROTECTION (FILTER AGG) EA 10 $75.00 4 $300.00 4 $300.00
CONNECT TO EX SAN SEWER (MHS) EA 4 $930.38 1 $930.38 3 $2,791.14
Page 1 of 5
--<-"'<, ><. ~"___~.,.,,,.,,,,_,>>>>>>>>:<<,:._,,.,,,,,.",,,,,,",,,"''''''''''~.:."<.,.,.,,.,,..:.c<." ""~'v",m,_,.,-__"w".".m=-__' _"-"",_",,,,,,,,,,_,,,<,~_-<,;_'_":""'V_"'''''''''''''''''''''''mm:_''''''>>~.'''_'_''''-'''>_'~_<__""':"">'-W"""_:_~"""_'_"v'-><m~',,_ ",..."'-".>'.:,.-,,..v...._,
ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED
i--~----~ ,-~---------_._-~- --,
L_ This Period [___To ~ate ___ ~
L-Unltj i Qua~ti_tyJ [Unit Price I ~iliYll Amount~[Qua~tityl CAmo~~t=_nl
CONNECT TO EX SAN SEWER (PIPE) EA 2 $305.62 2 $611.24 2 $611.24
4" ON 8" PVC WYE EA 26 $25.00 0 $0.00 26 $650.00
4" PVC SDR 26 (FOR SERVICES) LF 680 $27.00 575 $15,525.00 809 $21,843.00
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (0-10' DEPTH) LF 370 $22.00 0 $0.00 255 $5,610.00
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (10-12' DEPTH) LF 520 $23.50 182 $4,277.00 566 $13,301.00
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (12-14' DEPTH) LF 490 $26.50 235 $6,227.50 558 $14,787.00
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (14-16' DEPTH) LF 130 $31.00 130 $4,030.00 130 $4,030.00
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (16-18' DEPTH) LF 135 $38.00 135 $5,130.00 135 $5,130.00
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (18-20' DEPTH) LF 220 $50.00 217 $10,850.00 217 $10,850.00
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (20-22" DEPTH) LF 170 $60.00 168 $10,080.00 168 $10,080.00
CONSTRUCT 8" OUTSIDE DROP LF 5.6 $275.00 5.6 $1,540.00 5.6 $1,540.00
48" DIA SSMH EA 7 $2,150.00 3 $6,450.00 7 $15,050.00
EXTRA DEPTH MH OVER 10' LF 31 $125.00 25 $3,125.00 32 $4,000.00
CONNECT TO EX WM EA 25 $3,175.00 2 $6,350.00 9 $28,575.00
REMOVE EX HYD AND GV EA 27 $600.00 4 $2,400.00 17 $10,200.00
REMOVE EX GV EA 27 $275.00 3 $825.00 13 $3,575.00
CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY WM & SERVICES LF 2500 $1.00 0 $0.00 2470 $2,4 70.00
6" DIP CL 52 WI FITTINGS LF 370 $39.00 85 $3,315.00 230 $8,970.00
8" DIP CL 52 WI FITTINGS LF 1160 $37.00 0 $0.00 1150 $42,550.00
10" DIP CL 52 WI FITTINGS LF 25 $60.00 30 $1,800.00 30 $1,800.00
12" DIP CL 52 WI FITTINGS LF 10 $65.00 0 $0.00 4 $260.00
6" GV AND BOX EA 24 $850.76 0 $0.00 6 $5,104.56
8" GV AND BOX EA 7 $1,050.00 0 $0.00 4 $4,200.00
10" GV AND BOX EA 6 $1,270.00 3 $3,810.00 4 $5,080.00
12" GV AND BOX EA 1 $1,700.00 0 $0.00 1 $1,700.00
6" LIVE TAP ON EX 10" WM EA 6 $1,950.00 4 $7,800.00 4 $7,800.00
1" TYPE K COPPER WI FITTINGS LF 600 $21,00 616 $12,936.00 736 $15,456.00
1" CORP STOP EA 26 $60.00 22 $1,320.00 26 $1,560.00
1" CURB STOP AND BOX EA 26 $135.00 22 $2,970.00 26 $3,510.00
CURB STOP COVER CASTING EA 51 $99.91 14 $1,398.74 14 $1,398.74
HYD 7.5' BURY WI GV EA 29 $2,550.00 4 $10,200.00 19 $48,450.00
6" HYD EXTENSION EA 15 $315.00 0 $0.00 10 $3,150.00
Page 2 of 5
-'* '_""""__""_'<<":"*'*W<"<"_":_"""~<<<-'''-''''''-_.""","''''_ '_"~""_'~__"""""_..,,,,_:.,,'''''''_''''',_''w___''''.>;.:.,~'''''',.'''=,_,~,
ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED
I This Period 11-----~__n_~._ _ _
I' To Date ;
L-_"_.____._~_____ n_
lUnit --I r Quantity II Unit Price I I Quantity II Amount lfQuantit~ [_-Amount- -i
__':""""->>.<>i<~R''''''''''m,_=__w""",:"w..-....._:;,_",,,,_..m____, - r_ ~~""""=<- ~
12" HYD EXTENSION EA 5 $355.00 0 $0.00 4 $1,420.00
CONNECT TO EX STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EA 7 $580.00 3 $1,740.00 4 $2,320.00
CONNECT TO EX STORM SEWER EA 32 $435.00 6 $2,610.00 11 $4,785.00
BULKHEAD EX STORM SEWER EA 11 $375.00 0 $0.00 2 $750.00
12" RCP DES 3006 CL III LF 238 $32.00 260 $8,320.00 304 $9,728.00
15" RCP DES 3006 CL III LF 700 $33.30 381 $12,687.30 381 $12,687.30
18" RCP DES 3006 CL III LF 303 $35.25 304 $10,716.00 304 $10,716.00
42" RCP DES 3006 CL III LF 160 $79.00 95 $7,505.00 95 $7,505.00
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 24"X36" EA 17 $1,370.00 8 $10,960.00 12 $16,440.00
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-48 EA 8 $2,000.00 2 $4,000.00 3 $6,000.00
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-60 EA 2 $2,300.00 2 $4,600.00 2 $4,600.00
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-72 EA 3 $2,765.00 2 $5,530.00 3 $8,295.00
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-84 EA 2 $4,240.00 2 $8,480.00 2 $8,480.00
CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-90 EA 1 $4,600.00 1 $4,600.00 1 $4,600.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $14,200.00 0.3 $4,260.00 0.5 $7,100.00
1 1/2" CORP STOP EA 1 $180.00 0 $0.00 1 $180.00
1 1/2" CURB STOP AND BOX EA 1 $200.00 0 $0.00 1 $200.00
1 1/2" TYPE K COPPER W/FITTINGS LF 40 $27.00 0 $0.00 40 $1,080.00
CUT 4" ON 8" WYE EA 15 $155.00 5 $775.00 8 $1,240.00
Subtotal $568,378.86 $1,090,709.87
f~rr,',"Iimii<<>_~~:~:~'~:'=~_z'''''''''_""",,''''''''::''''__~~_.''M._~'/'';MMM'''''ii:!#,;.,<!4<'i{#$';'!;W'!'M"';.;o."'~__~~~M"':"'_"<<=_:--'~~'''l:_-=:,;""'~#....._'*'''''''':
Page 3 of 5
City of Hastings
DAKOTA HILLS AREA IMPROVEMENTS
Application for Payment Number: 2
Period Ending: 8/31/2005
Contractor: Pember Excavating Company
N 4449 - 469th Street
Menomonie, WI 54751
---.--.- .-.-----. .__ ____ _____ _ ___.._~_ ____.__d_______'_.__n~___n___________.___..___._______.._______________ _____.______.n_n_ ________u____________
Contractor Date
...- ---_..-. .-..-.. --.- .-.---...------- ~----_. ..._---_._---------~- ---._-~----,-------
Engineer Date
.-.---- - .~.._-_.- --~_._-~------_._- .._._--~ - ----- ----~-,.,_.,._-_.-
Approved by: Owner Date
- <1'~ --""l-~.~::"'_>~::~_,::,::~~,~__<i< \'''--~'-''''"''-$>.~ rw<~__:_ _~~_~'::"*":m"'\_"",:,~:~::w::"",:_::~::,~~_~'@~'"'
Page 4 of 5
PAYMENT SUMMARY:
_u~Clru~~~_~___~_____ _~~ri~d Retainage Payment
1 7/1/2005 - 7/31/2005 $0.00 $522,331.01
2 8/1/2005 - 8/31/2005 $0.00 $568,378.86
TOTALS TO DATE: I $0.00 $1,090,709.87 I
Total Completed To Date $1,090,709.87
Less Retainage: $0.00
Less Previous Payment: $522,331.01
Total Amount Due: $568,378.86
Page 5 of 5
-..--.. ,-, "',.:__V____~,.,.,'".',_~'_h"*'<._""* -. __"'_-=*'__""-:->-"''''''O_'''''__''''''_"~""",.....,>~=,,,_
Request For Payment
Date: September 12, 2005 VI-4
Project: ZWEBER LANE AREA IMPROV
Contractor: Pember Excavating Co.
Request Number: 2
Payment Period: 8/1/2005 - 8/31/2005
ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED
I__n_~'___ m~_____'____ '--'------'1 -.-..----
L. This Period .~ To Date
,...."'--" ....., , .........-..,... 'I C ... ._~......'-, I QuantitY'll' Amo~n't 1 i'Qu~~tityl i Amount
L.. Unitj I Quantity I i Unit Price I
"""__%",<<>~:",_.:.::>>>=""",,,:<<<<:.,.,. o"";,,,,,,,,,,,,,""':'''~'''-':'' >>""""_W"'"".-,:,,,,~~,,,,,:::,,:,,,:::.:.~:>,,,,,,,.
CLEARING (TREE) TREE 3 $325.00 1 $325.00 1 $325.00
GRUBBING (TREE) TREE 3 $325.00 1 $325.00 1 $325.00
SALVAGE FENCE LF 50 $18,00 0 $0.00 20 $360.00
REMOVE BIT CURB LF 2200 $2.00 0 $0.00 1488 $2,976.00
REMOVE CONC SIDEW ALK/DRIVEW A Y SY 200 $6,00 179 $1,074.00 179 $1.074.00
MILL BIT PAVT SY 4100 $2.50 0 $0.00 3600 $9,000.00
SALVAGED AGG FROM STOCKPILE Cy 200 $8.00 0 $0.00 540 $4.320.00
REMOVE BIT PAVT Sy 100 $3.00 24 $72.00 24 $72.00
COMMON EXC (EV) CY 5300 $7.00 -805 ($5.635.00) 0 $0.00
SUBGRADE EXC (EV) Cy 300 $8.00 0 $0.00 414 $3.312.00
TOPSOIL BORROW (LV) CY 275 $16.50 176 $2.904.00 176 $2,904.00
AGG BASE CL 5 (STREET) TON 1150 $10,00 0 $0.00 1270 $12,700.00
BIT MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 175 $2.65 210 $556.50 215 $569.75
BIT WEAR COURSE (MV 3) STREET TON 360 $37.00 438.69 $16,231.53 438.69 $16.231.53
BIT NON WEAR COURSE (MV 3) STREET TON 360 $38.00 420.15 $15,965.70 471.82 $17.929.16
CONC CURB & GUTTER B618 LF 2300 $9.25 1903 $17,602.75 1903 $17.602.75
6" CONC DRIVEWAY PVMT (SY) SY 235 $54.00 238 $12.852.00 238 $12,852.00
CHIMNEY SEAL EA 2 $300.00 3 $900.00 3 $900.00
SALVAGE & REINSTALL EX CASTING EA 2 $75.00 5 $375.00 5 $375.00
SIL T FENCE LF 600 $2.40 0 $0.00 803 $1,927.20
WOOD FIBER BLANKET TYPE REGULAR Sy 1000 $1.35 3370 $4,549.50 3370 $4,549.50
SOD SY 2100 $3.00 1707 $5,121.00 1707 $5,121.00
SEED LB 10 $21.00 85 $1,785.00 85 $1,785.00
__;_AA-~;_:=:__,,,:_,:;_:,,~::<,,;;""";;:_"~'0:"=.-i<';:;;:;:"'m;:_,:.-,-0'-""'~>;':'Wi::~::'''i':'_'>_,_':_",~~>'i:'i;;;:~~::,,::,;:;*;,;;;;(t:>>>:_""""'l>I';:_>""_'_-=~:~:"'_'_WY&;":~_",=.,",,,_~;:::;:\..,--,,,.,,__@._\",_=-;_:<~~~:_;;;",;~;":''''''m:~~:;::,:::_<=~ .. ~~_\';:l-
Page 1 of 4
___"""*""_",~,,,,,_w.'>"'''''V''''''__'''''''"''_Z'~'"''___''*'< >>:<'-,..,,-<"""--.<< ",=_-""""""""",;"X"",="_Y;,W",*,,,_,,,:,,,~~,,,,,,,,:.,.._:,,,.-.,,,,,",<<<._...,,<~,___,,<<_,
ITEM ORIGINAL BID COMPLETED
1--~-'-1 c--------' ,----, I This peri~__~ C~=~_!O ri~te =~=J
I Unit i I Quantity i I Unit Price I I Quantity I i Amountll Quantity! i--A~OU~t-~j
L--- -' ..:......JL
~ "'~___~=->:<.:;"'"__>>=_o{.._ __'>W.-..-~ 5 Y ""'. --'~I:_"'~-:<,;
FERTILIZER TON 0.2 $1,050.00 0.1 $105.00 0.1 $105.00
CONNECT TO EX SAN SEWER (PIPE) EA 3 $600.00 0 $0.00 1 $600.00
4" ON 6" PVC WYE EA 2 $90.00 1 $90.00 1 $90.00
4" PVC SDR 26 (FOR SERVICES) LF 250 $25.50 9 $229.50 41 $1.045.50
6" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (0-10' DEPTH) LF 20 $42.25 11 $464.75 11 $464.75
8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (0-10' DEPTH) LF 20 $65.00 0 $0.00 16 $1,040.00
2" THICK 4' X 8' INSULATION SHEET SHEET 7 $64.00 0 $0.00 6 $384.00
48" DIA SSMH EA 1 $3,000.00 0 $0.00 1 $3.000.00
CONNECT TO EX WM EA 1 $3,100.00 0 $0.00 2 $6,200.00
REMOVE EX HYD AND GV EA 1 $650.00 0 $0.00 1 $650.00
6" DIP CL 52 WI FITTINGS LF 455 $34.25 0 $0.00 455 $15,583.75
6" GV AND BOX EA 2 $875.00 0 $0.00 1 $875.00
6" LIVE TAP ON EX 8" WM EA 1 $1,400.00 0 $0.00 1 $1.400.00
1" TYPE K COPPER WI FITTINGS LF 300 $27.00 15 $405.00 210 $5,670.00
1" CORP STOP EA 4 $80.00 0 $0.00 6 $480.00
1" CURB STOP AND BOX EA 4 $135.00 0 $0.00 4 $540.00
CURB STOP COVER CASTING EA 3 $65.00 3 $195.00 3 $195.00
HYD 7.5' BURY WI GV EA 4 $1.930.00 0 $0.00 4 $7,720.00
6" HYD EXTENSION EA 2 $345,00 1 $345.00 1 $345.00
12" HYD EXTENSION EA 1 $390.00 1 $390.00 1 $390.00
15" RCP DES 3006 CL III LF 365 $30.50 0 $0.00 308 $9,394.00
18" CORRUGATED HDPE PIPE SMOOTH INTERIOR WAL LF 250 $30.00 232 $6,960.00 232 $6.960.00
18" GAL V STEEL APRON W ITRASHGUARD EA 1 $450.00 1 $450.00 1 $450.00
CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 24"X36" EA 4 $1,460.00 0 $0.00 3 $4,380.00
CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-48 EA 1 $2,020.00 0 $0.00 1 $2,020.00
CONST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES 4020-54 EA 2 $2,425.00 0 $0.00 1 $2.425.00
TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $4,500.00 0.5 $2,250.00 1 $4,500.00
COMMON EXC (REVISED) CY 5300 $12.85 2296 $29,503.60 2296 $29,503.60
Subtotal $116,391.83 $223,621.49
-- _K_____"'-m:,""~,;";:~~>>''''~w~~<>'>>''';>>~:~":'_;:'_",~,:_,,~,,''::~",,','~,,=""'..,=~;"%-.-,..=M,~""""''>>-=~,~::____<o'''''''_.,.I:.',:;':~m~_....,'.w~,=-"">:"''*'=_.,'_,,, ~-~"~~ ""'_':IlI""_-,,,;,,:~:::=,,>~,,_,_~,,,;,;;"-',+'M!;:;_:;_;'N'=;~'\<'<:'"''''~=>>>:=';;::;'~N_",___'''';'''''''
Page 2 of 4
City of Hastings
ZWEBER LANE AREA IMPROVEMENTS
Application for Payment Number: 2
Period Ending: 8/31/2005
Contractor: Pember Excavating Co.
N 4449 - 469th Street
Menomonie. WI 54751
_ .._____._.__.-___ __________n____.___.______n_..,_.._____ .*n _____un____ -- ------
Contractor Date
--- ----------....-.------ ~._._._---
Engineer Date
_. ---- ___.. u..___.___ ---- -...-.----- ------~.,- '.. ,__no. .__.__.,_____~_.. _...._ ---_..,.--.--
Approved by: Owner Date
,."" ~--";~~="",,,~~,~~<*,,:_:,,,,~ -~ W~~~= *"" - ,~ I ~s,-""'>~"""^""''''~!;.~~'''--~'''~~~:~~<'ii~;''''
Page 3 of 4
J~AYMENT SUMMARY-.:.
__!~~~~_!. tJ_____u _______~_~~i!?d - -- ------- Retainage ___ _u~~~~!n~_
1 7/1/2005 - 7/31/2005 $0.00 $107,229.66
2 8/1/2005 - 8/31/2005 $3,112.90 $113,278.93
TOTALS TO DATE: I $3,112.90 $220,508.59 I
Total Completed To Date $223,621.49
Less Retainage: $3,112.90
Less Previous Payment: $107,229.66
Total Amount Due: $113,278.93
tiiS. I.. -~~ --<<,,:~+ -
Page 4 of 4
Memo VI-5
To: Mayor Werner and City Council
From: John Hinzman, Planning Director
Date: September 19, 2005
Subject: Authorize Execution of License to Encroach #2005-61 - 2310
Westview Drive - Dan Owl
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to authorize the City Attorney to draft a license to allow
continuation of a +/- 3 foot encroachment of a garage owned by Dan Owl on the 23rd
Street Well Site (Well No.4). The license would allow for limited use ofthe
encroaching garage, with the underlying fee title remaining with the City. Please see
the attached map for further information.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval is recommended. The encroachment is located at the very rear, and downhill
from the well site building.
SITE MAP
PROPERTY /D NUMBER: 19-18350-020-05 2005 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES (PAYABLE 2006) 2005 BUILDING INFORMATION (PAYABLE 2006):
FEE OWNER: DANIEL J & DINA J OWL LAND: 101,600 LOT SIZE (EXCLUDES TYPE S.FAM.RES
2310 WESTVIEW DR BUILDING: 247,400 ROAD EASEMENTS) YEAR BUILT 1976
HASTINGS MN 55033-3418 TOTAL 349000 ARCH/STYLE SPLIT LEVL
. , 57931 SQ FT FOUNDATION SQ FT 1568
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2310 WESTVIEW DR SCHOOL DISTRICT: 200 1.33 ACRES FINISHED SQ FT 2696
HASTINGS MN 55033 BEDROOMS 4
LOCATION NE1I4 SE1/4 SECTION 32-115-17 BATHS 2.5
PAYABLE 2005 TAXES FRAME WOOD
PAYABLE 2006 HOMESTEAD STATUS: FULL HOMESTEAD GARAGE SQ FT 1692
NET TAX' 360202 OTHER GARAGE
SPECIAL'ASSESSMENTS: 0:00' WATERSHED DISTRICT: VERMILLION RIVER MISC BLOG
TOTAL TAX & SA: 3,602.02
LAST QUALIFIED SALE:
PAYABLE 2006 ASMNT USAGE: RESIDENTIAL DATE: 9/1997 AMOUNT: 214,000
~ " _ _~l" l ~-----,~,--- \ ,,~-IJ :I'=-_H_-===~--:;-m-
~~. - - \ (=
I
I
\
I
I
100 I
!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
[r;:~.-~____
/ I / '-
'I I
~L_J
'--~-------=:~-.
fl,;
-, ",'
~~(:,/
~ II
NOTE: Dimensions rounded to nearest foot PLAT NAME: COUNTRY ESTATES ADDITION N
TAX DESCRIPTION: 2 5 ~
Copyright 2005, Dakota County -
This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one.
This drawing is a compilation of records, infonnation and data located in various city, county, and
state offices and other sources, affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes
only. Dakota County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. If discrepancies are
found, please contact Dakota County Survey and Land Information Department
Map Date: September 14, 2005 Parcels Updated: 8/25/2005 Aerial Photography: 2002
VI-7
To: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers
From: Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator
Date: September 19, 2005
Re: Liquor License Amendment for October 29, 2005 for DuGarel's
Reauested Action
Approve the attached resolution approving a request to amend the liquor license of
DuGarel's for October 29,2005 contingent upon all requirements being met.
Backaround
Attached is a request from Jessie Ritter, manager of DuGarel's, for an amendment to
their liquor licenses and to allow for a tent on October 29. The amendment is to allow
the sale of liquor in a temporary site (in this case a tent), on the same property adjacent
to the permanent structure.
Access to the tent will be through the building of DuGarel's, and no alcohol will be
allowed outside of either the permanent or temporary site. Ms. Ritter has provided a
drawing of the site as well as Proof of Insurance from his insurance agent for the
temporary liquor sales. Ms. Ritter will work with both the Fire and Police Departments
for final approval of safety issues. Ms. Ritter still needs to remit the $5.00 City fee for
this request.
CITY OF HASTINGS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 09- -05
RESOLUTION APPROVING LIQUOR LICENSE AMENDMENT
FOR DUGAREL'S
WHEREAS, Ms. Jessie Ritter has presented application to the City of Hastings to
amend the liquor license to allow for a tent at DuGarel's on October 29,2005; and
WHEREA.S, a written request has been submitted; and
WHEREA.S, Ms. Ritter has presented the City with a site plan as well as Proof of
Insurance of the temporary liquor sales and will work with the City's Fire and Police
Departments for final approval
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Hastings that the Mayor and Administrative Assistant/City Clerk are authorized and
directed to sign this resolution amending the liquor license to allow a tent at DuGarel's
on October 29, 2005, contingent upon all requirements being met and all fees being
paid.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS THIS 19th
DAY OF September, 2005.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Michael D. Werner, Mayor
Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk
(SEAL)
AUG-22-05 MON 03:00 PM FAX NO.
P. 01
"
,
DlA.gayeLs -gay .5 L{ytLL
:YI F; vel'VVl.LllioV\. stl'at, HClShV\.0s, Mt-~ 5S'03.3
~~5:1.-4<;;t)-(l(J()3 felX:: ~,.51-4:'~T-1:rOp.
FCiX
To: City of Hastings Date: August 22, 2005
.._-~._..,_..-._,-------"
Fax: 651-437-'1082 Pages: 3
....--.......--. ..-....--.----.---...-
Attn: Melanie From: Mike Recer
-,..---.-.....----....
_.,--~_..,--,~-~-_.....
e-
n Ul'gent o For Review o Please Order o Reply
.--....--..- .--......----
_~~ I~t)os- -_._J.f<';$~ (. R; J.M W\" ...
fb..'f nuV U)M,^~
fM -ftl1lJ --2!-h1Y\A wtt \ t-t((t~ Yl-H L
_..--~-'-
____.------..lMM A~ '/1 VJti.t ~(.()jU.
-t s iu Ln Ovw
--------~----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FAX SENor --
....... .--.......... ----.-.
AUG-22-05 MON 03:00 PM F AX NO. P. 02
~'\-'-)0U"(~[?-_.~ c~ ~
J:')}4{2... (~G el L-L-
. .,_.... - - .J:./ .'~
". 1. () Y; '30,.. CL-C:6~
()C-T" /.1
)..!t9 l'.- t...Ot.....j et;"-:/l,"';) CQSTU/2.1G ?4't2:ry
~7 - <8'30- le-'06
t)1-~I\Jl)'~ U^:c.(:~& C,J...IU!lJCI<
.'r/~~~.) -T' /.;f() x ?c>
I ff'")I.--./ C b (S~;.0 I (...B-2
('0 .....- "; r'" )21065
-... ~-E&:. J~) .:)
q:S:J-, ?-o <?Z
...__........"'.._~.. -..... ~-.....,--~ , ""'- -'"
AUG-22-05 MON 03:00 PM FAX NO.
P. 03
I
. I
.--~"'--""'.-r---
I
I
, ~O
OC
~cO
X,
..---- (D
OJ--
a \,.b
(J)
~
----1m
I ([) 0
:J ~
r+
I .V
I
I
. .
I
'-UJ(,J .f i --- -
(,Q r+ 01 . t=l t:::::j
()l. i
t3bS I ----- 0 -
<0 ~ <II! I .......-- .
-. '
Nen .
N..O:C I ---- 0---
~~~ fIR ! _u
-.
NA_..). I
~ I .-.,.,.
I (.1-l -... 0
, 0J~O \
I --- --~
I ~ I
I
I -. --
-~
-). I -.-- ..
cr} !
I I
....- --- ---~
I
:
I
!;':/~:d t7l~H~l>'tS.,l :01 rbL(2Z62SG l~~~3d Al~~d 33J~~:~~ 0S:~t S002-St-~
4- . --.- . --- -
- ,-- - -'~ ' ,.'- -"~"~. '
~ I
: \
I
,
~
-4
;)
]
~ _ _.__-~~. _'- '-Ceftlficate-of-Ffame'Resistance' ---~--,.- ~- ,,------- --.-
~ i ~VJ'r~
t -
:J t .......... '
_ ".dI [ ""i'tm-~....l !
d I ..,... annbruster ~AllUfaeturing eOJDpaBY I ' , I
:' .... o'd route" .oulh . ..rlnolleld, 111I"";' 82707 '. I
<C ,,' -- '
'-'- , ThIs I, to cerllfy 'hal ',.e prod "CIS de>crlbOd herein have ~,labrlcaled ticm ",a.erla! s trea,eil .lor lI8me \
M ~tardai1~ ,whIch will not be TemoVed by washIng as spec\Ued by the fabrk: m,anufaclurer: .',-
-.r . . ' . . - .' .
!;j __ ~.. .-...'...--. e'';'';'; . . -- . ", _Jio,;...;.;p.;W. ::s....:.~ . 1
m _~.,~:..". .~ '00' ,-;.--.;"...' ' , "'.-';.;;"';~~- '
ill '; .....:;~...M_,... u~~ ;;'....,;;.;,it- ~ Yinvi . · -- .:: ," ,,' ,',: ,,: ,: ., .
J -~-i .-. ..: ........ -'~ .;,-. . .; '.- "-..' ...... ';'. ..,. ,'" ,..
go i.__.....'''';".:~". ,--,~,--' . .' ..,(__.........~nur.cote .-." ; , ' , . . "': -- .
z -:....~.,:~. '. .. . , .; ',' '..; . - -.. ..' .' .' .... . - I .: . '. .
l.;,! .............. .,..~ . It!lv'~;: '._ . ..~~.~ ,10132-.'. . .:i--,;._. .
~"" ,~~"~' .; :'-cf" ';S. ,':' ~':f "0 ..,; --"< .{"t~ -,;.,;.,-; : ~ " ,--, ~~.;.~: ~ ~~;;;:'rl~.- .
ii~~~I~ :i;;;":',;'.~f*!-C .-.-' w16m,. , . .' ~... '. ".' '> --::., ,":;"
~ ~:~a.ri-~ r:e.tardancy trea',ment 3 ~5 019 not e1~9C~iY& for lHe otm~leria.i a!ld r'
i'2 ;: n_ry. -- . .. .
-~ --" . .~
<::;) u.. .
8 ~ '2ft " . ' , .
:z: I"'l ~'km Slip.r."'~ . ' .
~ ~ ;
U"> ~
<::;) 'SI
I ~; ".
N \
N U'")
I .....
d I
::::> (<~
<C 2, -
.
mj Du ~.elS RECEIVED
~ ~ Uesl -fbtJ SEP 0 6 2005
CX;1Dblj2.
~ i
~
i ~~II
w
>
0:::
0
W
f-
<t
>
0:::
Q
L9 ---{ 17
!VI f.;;) If.;
); IV f) 2:lJ
:/J V"Js
VI-8
CITY OF HASTINGS
RESOLUTION NO. C - -05
Resolved that City of Hastings (TRAC) enter into an Agreement with the State of
Minnesota to provide public transportation service in the City of Hastings.
Further Resolved that City of Hastings (TRAC) agrees to provide a local share
of 20% of the total operating cost and 20% of the total capital costs.
Further Resolved that City of Hastings (TRAC) authorizes the Administrative
Assistant/City Clerk and the City Administrator to execute the aforementioned
Agreement and any amendments thereto.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Hastings, this 19th day of
September, 2005.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Michael Werner, Mayor
Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution is a true and correct copy of the resolution
presented to and adopted by the City of Hastings at a duly authorized meeting thereof
held on the 19th day of September, 2005 as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my
posseSSIOn.
Melanie Mesko Lee
Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk
Notary:
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers VI-9
FROM: Dave Osberg, City Administrator
DATE: September 15, 2005
SUBJECT: Authorize Use of City Property and City Resources for
Commercial Production
RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION
It is recommended that the City Council take action authorizing the use of City Property
and City Resources as spelled out in the attached letter for the production of a
commercial on Wednesday September 21st, with Thursday September 22nd as a rain date.
BACKGROUND
Staffhas included in the packet a copy of a letter from Harder-Fuller films outlining
information regarding a proposed production of a commercial in Hastings on Wednesday
September 21St, with Thursday September 22nd as a back-up date, in the event of rain, or
other production problems. I have also enclosed in the packet a copy of a Resolution
adopted by the City Council on January 16th, 1996 establishing procedures for such
productions. Mr. Mark Har has a copy of these procedures. In addition to the information
outlined in the letter, Mr. Har indicated that he may need to hire an Police Officer for a
short period of time for traffic control in the event they choose film the main street
looking east, in the area near the Post Office. That decision will likely be made either
Friday or day.
HHRDER-FULLIR FILIJIS I.~ 311 Rrst Ave. N., 1405, Mpls., MN 55401
PHONE: (612) 338-3288 FAX: (612) 338-3289
&maD: hrtiIms@bilstre&m.net Web: www.harderfuller1ilms.com
-!: f:
, '. ,:; .~
\ \,\ 1 ..
/ I
. '. , //
. ~ Sept. 13, 2005
... ....... ~.r .,r
'.... ---... .),-
.~
............ ,.-:"..".."..
Dave Osberg
City Of Hastings:
401 4th 81. E-
Hastings, MN 55033
Dear Mr. Osber~
Harder Fuller Filins, a production company located. in Minneapolis, is producing a
series of three television commercials for Great Clips, a hair salon franchise
headquartered in :Edina. The commercials are a collection of vignettes, when Great
Clips customers share moments with other customers or stylists.
The vacant storefront located at 301 2nd St E. was chosen becalL'\e oflts proximity to
the downtown area. Weare interested in creating a small town Great Clips, and
unfortunately, most salons are located in strip malls. By using the vacant storefront and
creating our own:Great Clips, and using the downtown as a backdrop, we are able to
create a small-town, Americana setting for our store.
About 50% of the filming will take place inside the store. We are going to assemble an
artificial store in~or and lobby, complete witb styling chairs. We would like to film
the other 50% of the commercial at the following locations:
1) On the sidewalk outside 301 2nd. St. E.
2) On the sidewalk in front of the Gardner House / .Beauty School.
3) In the smaIl park located at the comer of2Dl1 St. and Ramsey St.
4) On the set of stairs located along the rivemont, at the end of Sibley St. just past
the American Legion.
:
We would create!"lifestyle moments" at each of the locations. Examples include a man
walking out our Great Clips store, a couple walking up the stairs at the riverfront, or a
girl walking a dog through the small park.
Disruption will ~ kept to a minimum. Lighting equipment will be sparingly used, and
we will never attempt to do any kind of traffic control or deny pedestrian traffic access
to any building. We may occasionally ask people to wait a moment while we are
filming so that they don't unintentionally walk. through a shot. The wait would never be
for more than a n)inute.
;
;
<:00 III IVd t<::Ll SOO<:/Cl/60
HHROER-FUlliO FILDIS lie. 311 Firs1 Ave. N., ...os. Mpls.. MN 55<<11
PHONE: (612) 338-3288 FAX: (612) 338-3289
E-maU: hffHrns@bitslr8am.net Web: www.harderfulJerfilms.com
;.: ,. ~
\\ if
\,\'.. .__/ / All the businesses near our filming locations will be notified with a flier. The flier will
.'.....~."'....__ -".r-.~,....I' include contact iriformation so that business owners can contact us with any questions
........._L.--- or concerns. We iwill never shoot in front of or near a business without first requesting
permIssion.
Harder Fuller Fitins has been producing television commercials'for over ten ye~ and
past clients include Target, the Gap, and Sears. I have worked in film production for
over 12 years, coordinating locations for movies such as "Joe Somebody," "rmgle all
the Way" and ""A; Simple Plan."
Thanks for taking the time to consider this request. Please contact me at 612-210-4055
if you have any questions or concerns.
I
j
i
COOIi'1 IVd t~:Ll SOO6/Cl/60
TA'/LOR g TAYLOR fax:310-B26-SJOO Sep 13 2005 10:04 P.04
..
J A CORDTM CERTIFJCATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE J DATI!.....DI7m1
'/J.J/os Oiln
PAOIllJCER THIS CERTlACATE IS ISSUED AS A NATTER OF INFORMATION
. Ta.ylor 1: . raylor, Ltd. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERnFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTlRCATE DOES NOT AYEHD. EXTEND OR
12100 W:l.1shi.re Bou1eTard AL"!ER n-e COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POUCIES BE1.OW.
Los ADge1eG, CA ,OD25 INSURERS AFFORCING COVERAGE
(3U) 826-7200 INSURER A: Viailant. J:.nau.ra:a.ce C!omc:aJ1V {Chu])bl
.$URED
:Harder Pu11e:r Pi.l.m.&, ::D1C- INSURER B: J'edera1. :In6Urance Cn1llT\aD.V (ChUb:b)
311. first ATenue, J(orth INSURER C: pii.cific Indem:p.ty COJII1)iUlY { Chubb}
suite ~os INSURER D:
V-lnneanQli.s JDl' 55401 INSURER E:
COVERAGES
Ttie POUC1E8 OF INSURANCE USTED BELDW HAYE seeN I~SOED TO THE'INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POUCY peRIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING
AN'( REQUIREIIlEttT, TERM OR colllomON OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMI:NT Willi RESl"eCTTO WHICti THIS CERTIFICATE MAT BE !$SUED OR
MAT PERTAIN. THE IN&uRANCE AFpORDED SYTHE POLICIES DESCRIBED H:RBH!~ SUBJECT TO AU THE TERMS, EXCl.USlOHS Alm t:iONDtnoNS OF SUCH
POUCJI$. AGGReGATE UNITS SHOWN M.Y HAVE BEEN REDUceO a~ PAlO C~~S.
JICj "NPE OF MURAMCE "OUCT NUIlIIIEJ{ PDUC\' EFFEC'TlVi: POUCY OtPlRA11DN LI1'tIm>
ATE
GaIMAL LIA!IIUTY
AX COMMEAClAl GBEIW.. Ut.8ItnY
ClAIMS MI'.DE Ii] OCCUR 7953-68-4' 5/13/05 5/13/06
AUTOM::lIllLE UADLtlT COMBINED Sl/lIGl.E LlMrt S 1,000,000
B ~IIIY N.ITO (EB _llIen)
AU. OWrEO AUT'OS BODILY l~lJRY S
$CPfEQl.A.liio AI1T03 (per PGfMl")
X HIRED AvmS HS3 -68-50 5/1.3/05 5/1.3/06 80DIL Y INJURY
$
% NO...owllElJ IoLJ'iOS !Per lllXldenl)
X }lired PhYZiicaJ. PROPEl'CTYDAMAGE s
. (Pllr ::Jccfden:)
CARAC:E1..IAilILJN I
AMY AUTO OTHER THAN !
AIJ'TO ONLY;
EXCESS UABlUTY EACH OCCURRENCE I
OCCUR 0 CUJMS WDe T~
DEOUC11~
III $
lIIItIRIlalS CONI'ElGAllON NIO
eMPLO't"EltS l.lA8II.Irt
B 7'5)-6"8-51. 5/1.3/05 5/1.3/06 000
000
E.1. aD
o~ Third part.y Pro ert:y na:lllage $1.,000,000 L~t:J $1.,500 Ded
C props/sees/Wardrobe 7953-68-48 5/13/05 5/13/06 $ 125,000 LiJDi.t:; $1.,000 Ded
Kiscal.1aJ1.eQ'Uu B~i t- $1.,OOO,OOD L~t1 $~,5DO Deli
t>spec1.al. POl:m, WoZ':L i.cie , 1ep1acement CO&t 1
,
DE3CIUPT1OH OF CJPERA11ONM.OCATlOIoI$IVEHJl:I.E5IS(CLU3IONS ADDEO 8'1' 91DORlSEIlIIEICTJ5PCcw. PRlTt/l$lClNS
cert1f1.cate :HoJ.deJ:' is :iDcJ.uded a.s aD Addit::LcmaJ. :Dlsured on the Gczlcra,1 LiahiJ.iey poUc::y ri~
~lSpect to cJ.a.iJu ari.sing ou~ of tlhe llegJ.i.gtmCC of the !famed :rn..ured.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER ADorn KeD-IN CANCEllATION
:lHClt/tol APt"" GF nfi!.oIOilClIIiO 0ESCR1Ba:I PC~ BE CANCEUED Be~TlfE E:ICI'IM.TlON
~TE. THE ISSUIHG INSUREIl. WU, ENOe..VOR TO lid. 10 IlA"t3 WRITTEN
City of Bastags NOTICE TO THE CEmFlCA,", ~ 1VIlIlIiI)'Ttl"nlE LEFT, Bur FAlI.\IRE,.O DO :10 $hALl..
J.01 ~th street E. IMPOSE NO OSUGAnaN OA I.IAIIlUTY 01' NN IlINIl UPON lllE IICSUlER, ITS JoGENTS OR
xasting&, .. 55033
Att:n: DaTe Osbe:t:g'
ACORD 2s.s (7/97) @ ACORD CORPORATION 1988
ZOO/ZOO ~ IVd lO:Sl SOOZ/Cl/60
. ~ ,
RESOLUTION No. 1-9-96
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS
ESTABLISHING CERTAIN PROCEDURES AND STANDARDS
FOR USE OF CITY PROPERTY AND CITY RESOURCES
FOR FILM OR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTIONS
WHEREAS, The City of Hastings has periodically been asked to provide
resources to allow for the recording of certain commercial and film productions;
and
WHEREAS, recording of commercial and film productions may result in the
use of City property such as parks and parking lots; and
WHEREAS, recording of commercial and film productions can result in the
use of, and blocking of public rights-of-way and city sidewalks; and
WHEREAS, The Hastings City Council seeks to establish certain procedures
and standards for use of City property and City resources for film and commercial
productions;. and
~
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY
OF HASTINGS, that the City Staff is hereby directed to use the following
procedures and standards for the use of City property and City resources for film
and commercial productions:
1.) A certificate of insurance naming the City of Hastings as an additional
insured, in the amount of $2,000,000 (general aggregate) and $1,000,000 (single
limit) must be provided before any filming or set up work is initiated.
2.) The City of Hastings must be identified in a hold harmless and
indemnification certification from the film company responsible for conducting the
commercial or film productions.
3.) The City Council must approve any blocking or closing of City Streets
for any time period in which film or commercial is going to take place.
Furthermore, traffic shall be stopped only during the actual filming activities.
Should the scheduling of the commercial or film recording not allow for the review
by the City Council of those streets to be blocked off, the City Staff must advise
the film production company that no such streets will be blocked off, and no
administrative permission can be granted.
. 1
4.) Recording will take place during the hours in which the least disruption
will take place to the residents and the business owners in the City of Hastings.
Any restriction to a place of business or a home, must include a signed
written consent agreement from the owner, provided to the City of Hastings.
5.) Access to pharmacies, the post office, medical and dental offices,
banks, restaurants (during meal times) must be avoided, and delaying of
commuters, buses, and children must also be avoided.
6.) The film company must notify every owner, tenant and resident in the
area of the recording within 72 hours in advance of the schedule, and the film
company must also provide the telephone number of a contact person who will be
on site during the recording of the film or commercial.
7.) Use of hazardous materials requires receipt of a appropriate permit from
the Hastings Fire Department.
8.) Contract security shall be required as approved and/or provided by the
Hastings Police Department, with the recording company charged the current rate
for this security; and normal charges for use of Fire and Ambulance Department
equipment and personnel shall be in addition to those charges indentified in item
#9.
9.) There shall be a charge of $150.00 for every day, or prorated fraction
thereof, in which City property and/or City resources are used for the recording of
a commercial or film.
Adopted by the Hastings City Council this 16th , day of January ,
1996.
Ayes: Counci.l.naIiJe Riveness, Plan, Johnson, Hicks, M:>ratzka and Mayor Werner
Nays: None
Absent: Counci.lIrentJer Simacek
~LY->~
Michael D. Werner
(Attest) Mayor
1: - . .~ (seal)
~~'c./d-f"L4,;..~.4'~}'--
Barbara C. Tompson
City Clerk-Treasurer
VI-10
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council members
FROM: Charlene A. Stark, Finance Director
RE: Amendment to Audit Policy
DATE: September 13, 2005
In April of 1998 the City Council approved a policy for audit services. The policy
indirectly prohibits the City from asking the current auditors to rebid for the next three to
six years. I request to make an amendment to the policy to allow the current auditors to
submit a proposal if they so choose to.
Amended Policy:
Contracts for audit services for the City of Hastings will be for a three year period - with
the option of renewing once for an additional three - year period. They City .....ill not
retain an audit firm for a period longer than a consective six year period.
The City shall bid for audit services every three years unless the option to renew services
has been exercised. The City must, at minimum bid for audit services after a six year
period with the same audit firm. This policy does not preclude the CUlTent audit tinn to
be denied from the process of renewal f()r audit services.
Council Action:
Approve the amended audit policy.
VI-11
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council members
FROM: Charlene A. Stark, Finance Director
RE: Budget Adjustment
DATE: September 13, 2005
Parks department has started a fall softball program and the
revenue received is an addition to the 2005 budget.
The expenses for the program will run about $ 1,928.
A budget adjustment is requested to adjust the revenues for
$2,100 and the expenditures for $1,928.
Council Action:
Approve the 2005 budget adjustment requests.
VI-12
MEMO
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council members
FROM: Charlene A. Stark, Finance Director
RE: Utility Billing-request for waiver of a penalty.
DATE: September 13,2005
Attached is a letter received by the Finance department requesting the removal of the
$7.59 penalty.
We have received isolated cases, such as this relating to claims of placing payment in the
mail but never to reach the City, however the penalties have not been waived in the past.
This letter does indicate a problem that as unfortunate as it is is still out of the hands of
the City.
All of the utility bills received by mail or in the drop box are receipted the same day
received via the post office or when staff goes and collects daily in the morning from the
drop box. The only exception to this is on the penalty cut off days (usually the 20th ofthe
month) when staff works until 5:00 pm to assure same day receipt of any bills deposited
in the drop box during that day, as recommended by City Council.
The City does not accept post marks, but rather the funds must be received in the office
by 4:30 pm that day. The City is not in the practice of removing penalties unless there
has been an error on the part of the City.
Request for council action:
For the above stated reasons, staff recommends for denial of the waiver of penalty.
..
..
From: Leon Wirth
3600 Malcolm Ave.
Hastings, MN
651-437-6893 (Home) 651-480-5554 (work)
.
8/29/05
Attn. City of Hastings Bill Payment for Utility Bill Department
On 7/8/05 my wife, Cindy Wirth, put a check in the mail to the City of
Hastings for $75.85 for our utility bill. A few weeks later I found a bill from the City
of Hastings for Utility Bill and I paid it like any other bill. I did not know that this
was an overdue notice and that you did not receive our initial check so I paid the
$83.44.
We have since found out that another check that we mailed that same day
did not get to it's intended recipient and we also had 9 fraudulent checks written
on our checking account since. Apparently our mail was stolen and someone
copied our account number to use for the fraudulent checks. We have since
straightened out everything with the bank and we have closed our old checking
account and opened a new one.
I am enclosing the stop payment confirmation from the bank on the
original check we wrote to you. In light of all of this I think it is only fair that you
, credit us for late charge that you charged us for $7.59 since it was not our fault
. that the mail was stolen.
Please let me know what you decide.
Thanks,
Leon Wirth
..(\~~~-
PREVIOUS BAL. -
~ .
.
..
PREV BILL 3/31 71. 50
PAYMENT 4/04 71.50
PREVIOUS BALANCE .00
USAGE " BI!-L1NG CHA!'lGES
,
.
WA RESIDENTIAL 954 935 19 33.55
SW RESIDENTIAL 16 42.30
TOTAL CURRENT CHARGE 75.85
TOTAL SALES TAX .00
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE NOW 75.85
**AFTER DUE DATE** 83.44
() r ('J('~'J~ ( Pi If
f <<-.J 7/5/0J - p, C L'f J{ lu:;+~
.'
.
. .
.00 8/10/05
. . . . . .
1419200000 83.44
. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CODE EXPlANA liON WIRTH LEON
LOCATION: 3600 MALCOLM AVENUE 3600 MALCOLM AVENUE
HASTINGS MN 55033
MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: il i IJ If illl H Ifill ii U I UIIIH I'U If I } I,ll i fil Jilt ,II f Illli,! i
CITY OF HASTINGS
~; ~, f . f tJ '( L C20~ LJ:<J-1- S
~( v
Y/ f/ 6~-
Memo VI-13
To: Mayor Werner and City Council
From: John Hinzman, Planning Director
Date: September 19, 2005
Subject: Development Agreement - WilLIAMS 3RD ADDITION
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to approve the attached Development Agreement between the
City and the Duane Markuson for WILLIAMS 3RD ADDITION, a 14 lot detached townhome
development consisting of 14 units located on Whispering Lane
The City Council granted Final Plat approval on September 6, 2005. As a condition of
approval, the developer was required to enter into a development agreement with the city
to memorialize conditions of approval.
ATTACHMENTS
. Location Map
. Final Plat
. Development Agreement
Final Plat
Williams Third
Addition -
Duane Markuson
Legend
- Buildings
Roads
0 Parcels
+--------,-.-+-_.- Map Date: August 22, 2005
N
.:::::::::::-:::' . W*E
!II' co,..
, ,
, , em' OF IIAS11II8S
, ! " S
' --- I
L___..___ _ ,
, :
, '
, ' Site Location
WilliAMS THIRD ADDITION
I h.reby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as WlLUAMS
THIRD ADDITION: that this plat Is I; correct representation of the survey, th.t ,II dlnances .re
\ \ correctly shown on the plat In f..t and hundredths of a foot; that all monuments havII been
:,,1 ' ac.vw;t WJ .. \ correctly placed in the ground as shown: t!,at the outside boundary IIn.s are corr.ctfy
,I." .' =.". _ \ designated 0f1 the pl.t; and that ttaer. ar. nO wet lands IS defined In Minnesota Statutes 505.02
~ ~__ .' 'I ') S8:~~~~~1 "w 50 \ Subd. 1 or public highways to b. designated other than.s shown.
I"g' ( $I n.", $I' 01. g 4f" U,()D $I "-00 Sl n,tI
! r------ \ .,'" ----- ----- ----- ----- \
.. III 1 ,....' -----------------
f~ ~ I ; .;.;...... ~ "" /" ~ ... ~ \ Daniel L Thurm.s. land Surveyor, Mlnnuota \.Icensa No. 25718
\- ~: S ~ ~~ ~ ~ = I I~ ~ ~; ..-...,
:~., ~i 4 ~ I 3 ~ I 2 I;:! to 1." ~~~" .l', \ '" STATE OF MINNESOTA
~:~~"W ,: $<<JW'OO"( \ ~.:\ COUNTY Of DAKOTA
~:: 415.00 4',1JO 46.00 ".00 \ "i The fOr1lgolng Surveyor', Certificate was acknowledg.d before me this .___.. day
:~: ~ 8 6 8 '.Ja.ClO".. '\: of______. 2005. by Daniel L. Thurmn. Land Surveyor,
;~: g:'4 i ~ ;', H ra'\!7'Jn ''1:lo \ '.
::: 8'; "." ;~ .' ,. BLOCK 1 ""..,1,,.5.., \ ';: ---------------
:i~ g l't 15 ~"( -I... t) ~; =-' ~~ 'IS '" \' , Notary Public. Dakot. CountY. Minnesota,
::; G/) 8 8' 5II'5a'01"" My Commission Expires __'
;..~ , 7 i ~AN' .-.~oo :: ....00 -. \
~ -'~ ./ 1taz ~~ .'> \ PLAHN'NC COMMISSION Of HASTINGS. MINNESOTA
~!r ( $tO"O(YOO-W LOT e ~ ~ ~ .~~ \ Approved by the Planning Commission of the City of Hastings. Minnesota. at a regular meeting
ii~U =1 9 "I 10 · ~ 11 th...of, on th. -- d.V of -------. 200__.
'9~~; 8' ~ ~ ~ ~ \
~ ~ ~
J J \ By__.____._, Chair. By________. Secretary
\ " L______ 60
51 11,01 51 51,if 51 ".110 "',00 41.00 51
'- / 439,65 \
---- ..........., ___../ N99"53'5/"6 \ CITY COUNCIL OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA
=..,. S:':.i-F..,'MACfiHH :mr.: ADDiTION \ \ We do hereby certify that on the __ day of __________.200_ the Cltv Counc:1I
of Hastings, Minnesota approved this plat,
\
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That DUAne l. Markuson and Marcella ly________.____,Mayor. By________, Clerk
. PEli!.NC . M. Markuson. husband and wife. f.. ownelJl. of the following described property
fi;:...n'EilS"Ot<.E- 12.0"'0 ~ situated in the County of P"kota. St.te of Minnesota. to wit: DAKOTA COUNTY SURVEYOR
1- - - T -. W Pursuant to Section 383D. 65 Minnesot. Statutes, this plat has been .pproved this _....__. d.y
: I'" sIn:. NOIffit Lot 1. Block 1. W1LlIAMS FIRST ADDiTION. according to the recorded plat 0'.___._____..__, 200.._.
\ ~\ VI. ."... ''''1'' 0 40 80 thereof. Dakota County, Minnesota.
, ,<>' ~'~ ~ ~ I
~ T 1 f ~ I ~ ....... Have caused the same to be surveyed and :)Iiltted as WILLIAMS THIRD ADOmON :;ddUoil.f;~~~o;;';;c;u:;;~;;yor
, " SCALE. IN FEET and do hereby dOflate and dedicate to the public for the public Ute forever the
I' \' I' ,\~ I' eu.mlnts as shown on this plat for d~l"age And utility purposes.
I ...' ,+ I DAKOTA COUNTY TRfASURER-AUDITOR
L i -.J DftAINAGEANDUT1UTYEASOlENTS In witness whereof said DUoIne L. Markuson and Marcella M, Markuson. husband I hereby certify that the taxes for the year of 200___. for the land described on thIs plat as
--um"" ~- AQSHQWNASTHUS: and wife. fee ownen. hive hereunto set their hands this_day WIUIAMS THIRD ADDITION have been paid and no deU"quent taxes are due and tr.nsfer
~A~~"~~ 17 o,_____.200S. entered on thlJ ____ day 0'__._.._.____.....___. 200_.
lN05CAlIl lOl [10 ________________
- - - t - - - - t -.. By: ___________________ .________...____ County' Treasurer-Auditor . Dakoa County. Minnesota
IQK; IOntTtNWKml. UHUSSOTHEAWlSf Duane l. Markuson Marcella M, Markuson, DAKOTA COUNTY RECORDER
=~.~D~IHC;QNl.LOTUNfSAS Oocument Number______.
STATE OF ________ I hereby certify that this instrument was filed in the offlc. of the County Recorder for record on
DIWNAGCAHDUTlUTYWfM!NTOWRALLf11 COUNTYOF____ this ___._ day of______ 200__. at__._ o'clock __,M. and wa, duly
LOT15.1LOCK 1 The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me thls____day recorded In Book ____ of ..._._.... on pag.......___.
0'-____. 2005. by Jon Duane l. Markuson and Marcell. M. Markuson.
husband and wife. ______....___w_________.__..__
. OENOTU 1/2lNCH MONU,.OlTI'OUNO County Rec:order, Dakota County. Mlnn.sota
... 0 ::~.I~~~~~l':~~~:::: _____________________
Notary Publlc.______.County. _ _____I
CORNERSTONE ~W=C:~~~I\~~ MyCommlnlonExplres_____
LAND SUPt.VEVING. INC onOQ"tIO'OO"E
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR
WILLIAMS THIRD ADDITION
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _dayof ,2005, by and
between the City of Hastings, a Minnesota Municipal Corporation ("City") and Duane Markuson,
("Developer"); and
WHEREAS, Developer proposes to undertake the development and construction of a
residential development on property proposed to be platted as "WILLIAMS THIRD ADDITION'
(hereafter referred to as "Subject Property"); and
WHEREAS, public hearings have been held providing the opportunity for input by the
neighbors and all interested persons; and
WHEREAS, the Hastings City Council has approved Developer's proposed plat of the
Subject Property, subject to Developer signing this Development Agreement and otherwise
complying with all conditions of city council approval.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed between the parties as follows:
1. Application of Development AJ!reement. This Development Agreement shall apply to
the following property proposed to be platted in the City of Hastings, Dakota County,
Minnesota, legally described as:
1
Williams Third Addition, according to the plat
thereof, to be filed in the Dakota County Recorder's Office.
This property hereafter shall be referred to as "Subject Property". All references in
this Development Agreement to a lot, block or outlot, shall refer to a lot, block or
outlot contained in the plat of Williams Third Addition.
2. Parties Authoritv to Si1!n. Developer warrants to the City it has full authority to enter
into this Development Agreement and perform the conditions herein contained.
Developer further warrants that this Development Agreement will be recorded against
the Subject Property before any ofthe Subject Property is transferred or encumbered in
any way.
3. Densitv. The Subject Property has been approved for total density of 14 townhome
units to be constructed within 14 - one unit buildings.
4. Park Dedication Fees. The park dedication fees for the Subject Property have been
previously satisfied.
5. Sewer Interceptor Fees. The sewer interceptor fees for the Subject Property have been
previously satisfied.
6. Declaration of Coven ants, Conditions and Restrictions. Developer shall prepare and
submit to the City for its review and approval, a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions
and Restrictions or an equivalent document. This document shall be submitted and
approval must be given by the City before the City will release the final plat of the
Subject Property. The purpose of the declaration or equivalent document will be to
ensure maintenance of common open space, common drives and common utilities on-
2
site and off-site drainage areas. Furthermore, this document shall include, but not be
limited to, the following:
A. A statement requiring the deeds, leases or documents of conveyance affecting
buildings, units, parcels, tracts, townhouses or apartments to be subject to the
terms of the declaration.
B. A provision for the formation of a property owner's association or
corporation and that all owners must be members of said association or
corporation which will maintain all properties and common areas in good
repair and which may access individual property owners a proportionate share
of joint or common costs. The association or corporation must remain in
effect and may not be terminated or disbanded.
C. Membership in the association shall be mandatory for each owner and any
successive buyer.
D. Any open space restrictions must be permanent and may not be changed or
modified without City approval.
E. The association will be responsible for liability insurance, local taxes and the
maintenance ofthe open space facilities that are deeded to it.
F. Property owners will be responsible for their pro-rata share ofthe cost of the
association by means of an assessment to be levied by the association which
meets the requirements for becoming a lien on the property in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes.
G. The association may adjust the assessment to meet changing needs and costs.
3
7. GradinJ!. DrainaJ!e and Utilitv Plans. No construction or grading of any type shall take
place on the Subject Property until Developer has received final approval from the City's
Public Works Director for Developer's grading, drainage and utility plans. Furthermore, no
construction shall take place until Developer has reimbursed the City for all fees incurred by
the City in reviewing Developer's grading, drainage and utility plans. Developer assumes all
risks if Developer proceeds with any grading or utility replacement before receiving final
approval from the City's Public Works Director.
8. LandscapinJ! Plan. Before the City will sign the final plat, Developer must submit and
receive approval of Developer's landscaping plan_ This landscaping plan shall include, but
not be limited to, identifying the size, species and method of installation for all required
boulevard and front yard trees, as well as all cul-de-sac islands.
9. Tree Preservation FencinJ!. Before any grading is commenced on the Subject Property,
Developer shall install tree preservation fencing around all trees that are not to be removed.
This tree preservation fencing must remain in place and be maintained throughout all
development in the vicinity of the trees.
10. Tree Replacement. Developer shall replace all removed trees as specified in the Tree
Preservation Guidelines. These guidelines can be obtained from the City Forester.
11. Site GradinJ!. The entire Subject Property, i.e. all platted lots and all outlots, shall be
graded at the same time. All site grading on the Subject Property shall be completed
according to the grading plan approved by the City. All disturbed areas on the Subject
Property must be stabilized with a rooting vegetative cover to eliminate any erosion
problems. All disturbed areas on the Subject Property shall also be maintained so as
4
to comply with all City of Hastings property maintenance ordinances.
12. As-Built Gradinl! Plan. Upon completion of site grading, the Developer shall
submit to the Public Works Division for review, an as-built grading plan in a type and format
specified by the Public Works Division showing the newly graded elevations at all lot
comers, critical elevations in drainage ways, one foot contours at ponding and sedimentation
basins, and at ponding level control points for ponding basin emergency overflow swales.
13. Letter of Credit and Inspection Escrows.
A. Before Developer begins any grading on the Subject Property, Developer
shall post with the City a letter of credit or escrow in the amount of 125% of
the grading cost.
B. Before the Developer begins any street and utility construction, Developer
shall post with the City a letter of credit or cash escrow in the amount of
125% of the street and utility improvement costs. Additionally, before any
grading or street and utility construction commences, Developer shall also
post the cash escrow in an amount determined by the City's Public Works
Director to reimburse the City for inspection fees that incur for the grading,
street and utility construction inspections. Before Developer begins any
grading or any street or utility construction, Developer shall provide City with
proof ofliability and insurance in an amount of at least one million dollars.
City shall also be named as an additional insured on all liability insurance
policies used to satisfy the requirements of this paragraph.
C. All letters of credit required by this Agreement shall be in a form acceptable
5
to the City and issued by a company licensed to do business in Minnesota.
D. Maintenance Bond - Prior to accepting or approving the completed
Developer financed and constructed grading and/or street and utility
improvements, the Developer must submit a maintenance bond from
Developer's contractor in the amount of 20% of the improvement costs,
covering a period of one year after City acceptance of the improvements.
E. Privately Constructed Improvements - In the event the Developer elects to
pay one hundred percent (100%) of all costs incurred for installation of the
improvements outside of the normal assessment procedure, Developer may
do so provided Developer complies with the following requirements:
1. All construction shall be in accordance with plans and specifications
approved by the Public Works Division.
2. The Developer must retain a registered civil engineer to design and
inspect the improvements and to certify that the improvements were
constructed in accordance with the approved plans.
3. Complete the required improvements within a two-year period.
4. Provide the City with reproducible as-built drawings of the
improvements within two months of completion of the
improvements.
14. Svecifications - Insvections.
A. Unless otherwise stated, all of the required improvements shall conform to
engineering standards and specifications as required by the City. Such
6
improvements shall be subject to inspection and approval by, and shall be
made in sequence as determined by the Public Works Division. Plans and
specifications for the required improvements shall be submitted to the Public
Works Division in a type and format specified by the Public Works Division
for review and approvaL The required improvement plan review fee as
established by City Council resolution shall be paid at this time.
R Inspection of Public hnprovements - Construction of all subdivision street
and utility improvements and other required subdivision improvements shall
be inspected by a City designated inspector for compliance with City
standards, and the approved improvement plans and specifications. The
Public Works Director shall determine the estimated cost of inspection
services. The City will pay all improvement inspection costs incurred from
these escrowed funds, and furnish the Developer with copies of all invoices
received. The City will also charge 10% ofthe consultant fees to cover City
overhead and administration costs connected to the inspection services.
Excess funds will be returned to the Developer upon completion and
acceptance of the improvement project. If the funds deposited with the City
are insufficient to cover the inspection costs, the Developer will be required
to deposit additional funds with the City to cover the estimated overage.
C. As-Built hnprovement Plan - Upon completion of the required public
improvements, the City inspector shall prepare a record as-built drawing of
the constructed improvements.
7
15. Electronic CODies of Required Documents. Before the City will sign the final plat,
Developer shall submit to the City, electronic copies of the plat, plan set record
drawings and grading plan in an electronic format which is acceptable to the Hastings
Engineering Department.
16. ProDertv Monuments. Steel monuments shall be placed at all block comers, lot
comers, angle points, points of curves in streets and at intermediate points as shown
on the Final Plat. Such installation shall be the developer's expense and
responsibility. All U.S., state, county, or other official benchmarks, monuments, or
triangulation stations in or adjacent to the property shall be preserved in precise
position. The Developer shall replace all monuments displaced, damaged or removed
during grading operations. The monuments shall be installed after the final grading
has been completed. The Developer shall provide required certification of
installation to the County. A copy ofthis certification shall also be sent to the City.
17. Requirements for a Buildinl! Permit.
A. No building permits shall be granted on the subject property until such time
as a certified copy of the recorded plat has been filed with the City and
production of proof that all conditions of plat approval have been met. fu a
case where the City of Hastings is a party to the platting, a copy ofthe plat,
certified by the City Clerk as true and correct, shall satisfy the requirements
of this section.
B. No building permits shall be granted on the Subject Property until such time
that the Developer provides the City with a certified survey indicating that the
8
entire site as shown on the preliminary and final plats has been graded
pursuant to the approved elevations shown on the preliminary and final plats.
C. No building permits, except for approved sales models, shall be granted on
the Subject Property until the bituminous base course has been constructed,
sod behind the curb and gutter installed, and sanitary sewer, water main and
storm sewer improvements tested and accepted.
18. BuildinJ! Permit Submittal Requirements. An original certificate of survey from a
licensed surveyor is required for all new development, including expansions of
existing buildings. The Building Official may for accessory structures or minor
additions (decks, porches, attached garages), waive the Certificate of Survey
submittal requirements in favor of an approved site plan indicating the location of
existing and proposed structures in relation to lot lines.
A. The Certificate of Survey shall reference and be based on an approved
grading plan.
B. The Certificate of Survey shall include at a minimum the following
information:
1. Property boundaries.
2. Existing structures.
3. Proposed structures (including driveways).
4. Existing and proposed lot corner elevations.
5. Proposed drainage flow (arrows).
6. Proposed garage floor elevation.
9
7. Proposed lowest floor elevation.
8. Proposed lowest foundation opening.
9. Proposed top of foundation elevation (front and rear).
10. Proposed finish grade elevations at building corners.
11. Street right-of-way (to centerline).
12. Existing property monuments.
13. Detailed spot elevations for drainage swales based on the approved
grading plan.
14. Existing and proposed midpoint elevations on side lot lines.
15. Existing top of curb elevations at the extension of side lot lines and at
the midpoint of the lot.
16. On-site sewage treatment system location and potable well location, if
applicable.
C. Survey benchmarks shall be identified on certificate of survey.
D. Field hubs shall be placed onsite by a licensed surveyor to show top of
foundation elevation and setbacks.
19. Erosion Control Plan Requirements (Mav be identified on Certificate ofSurvev).
A. Silt Fence - A silt fence shall be identified on the erosion control plan. The
silt fence shall be located along the front yard (3 feet from curb or behind
sidewalk), along existing developed yards, and where needed for erosion
control as determined by the City's Engineering Department_
B. Rock Driveways - A rock driveway shall be identified on the erosion control
10
plan. The rock driveway shall be constructed ofCAlICA2 Course Aggregate
1-2" rock - 6" deep per MPCA Manual.
20. Successors and AssiJ!ns. This agreement shall be binding upon the successors and
assigns ofthe parties hereto and shall run with the land.
21. RecordinJ! of AJ!reement. An original executed copy of this Agreement shall be filed
with the Dakota County Recorder's Office, which shall give notice to all subsequent
purchasers of the property within the Subject Property of the provisions of this
Agreement. All recording fees shall be paid by Developer.
22. RecordinJ! of Final Plat. The final plat of the Subject Property, as approved by the
City, shall be recorded with the Dakota County Recorder's Office, before any
building permit is issued.
23. Other Conditions. Nothing in this Development Agreement shall limit or modify in
any way the conditions imposed by the Hastings City Council as part of its approval
ofthe preliminary plat and final plat ofthe Subject Property, which conditions are on
file at Hastings City Hall and which are incorporated in full into this Agreement by
reference.
24. Miscellaneous.
A. It is agreed that any breach of the terms ofthis Development Agreement shall
be grounds for the denial of any building permit, certificate of occupancy or
any other required city approvals with respect to the lot or lots to which the
breach directly relates. Developer shall be provided with notice of any breach
of the terms ofthis Development Agreement in accordance with the notice
11
provision hereafter and shall be provided a period of30 days in which to cure
the breach. During this 30 day notice, the City shall be allowed to withhold
any required pennits, certificates of occupancy or any other City approvals,
unless the City is given assurances in an amount and a form deemed
appropriate in the sole discretion of the City that the breach will be
eliminated.
B. If any portion of this Development Agreement is held in valid for any reason,
that decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this
Development Agreement.
C. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment
to the provisions of this Development Agreement. All amendments or
waivers to this Development Agreement must be in writing, signed by all
parties and approved by written resolution of the city council.
D. All parties to the Development Agreement have participated freely in the
negotiations and preparation hereof. Accordingly, this Development
Agreement shall not be construed more strictly against anyone of the parties
as a result hereof.
E. Any notice required by this Development Agreement shall be sent to the
parties as follows:
12
TO THE CITY:
City of Hastings
Attn: City Administrator
101 E. Fourth Street
Hastings, MN 55033
TO THE DEVELOPER:
Duane Markuson
13496 Hillary Parth
Hastings, Minnesota 55033
Dated this _ day of , 2005
.
CITY OF HASTINGS, A MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
By:
Michael D. Werner, Mayor
(SEAL) By:
Melanie Mesko-Lee, Assistant
City Administrator/City Clerk
Dated this _ day of ,2005.
Duane Markuson
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
13
.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SSe
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2005 by
Michael D. Werner and David M. Osberg, the Mayor and Deputy City Clerk of the City of Hastings,
Minnesota.
NOTARY PUBLIC
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
) SSe
COUNTY OF DAKOTA )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2005
by Duane Markuson, a single person.
NOTARY PUBLIC
THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY:
FLUEGEL & MOYNIHAN P.A.
1303 South Frontage Road, Suite #5
Hastings, MN 55033
651-438-9777
(SMM)
14
VI-15
To: Mayor Werner & Councilmembers
From: Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator
Date: September 14, 2005
Re: Resolution-Application for Premise Permit Renewal by Hastings
Lions Club for Lawful Gambling at the Bierstube, 109 11th Street
West
Council Action Reauested:
Adopt the attached resolution that approves a Lawful Gambling Premises Permit
Application by the Hastings Lions Club for a renewal of their gambling permit at the
Bierstube, contingent upon receipt of license fees.
Backaround:
The Lions Club has applied for a gambling license renewal to conduct lawful gambling
at the Bierstube. They have complied with reporting and donation requirements for
2005.
The license will be in effect from January 1,2006 to December 31,2007.
CITY OF HASTINGS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 09- -05
RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION OF A
PREMISES PERMIT RENEWAL FOR LA WFUL GA~BLING
BY THE HASTINGS LIONS CLUB AT THE BIERSTUBE
WHEREAS, the Hastings Lions Club currently has a license to conduct lawful gambling
at the Bierstube, 109 West 11th Street, Hastings, MN 55033; and
WHEREAS, they have applied to renew their gambling permit for the period of January
1,2006 through December 31,2007; and
WHEREAS, the Hastings Lions Club shall continue to comply with all applicable laws
governing lawful gambling, including the requirement for 50% of lawful gambling expenditures
to be used for lawful purposes with the City of Hastings trade area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hastings
that the Mayor and Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk are authorized and directed to sign
this resolution and forward it to the Minnesota Department of Gaming, Gambling Control
Division, showing approval of this renewal application for a Premises Permit to the Hastings
Lions Club at the Bierstube, 109 West 11th Street, Hastings, MN 55033.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS THIS 19th
DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2005.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Michael D. Werner, Mayor
Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk
(SEAL)
VI-16
TO Mayor Werner & City Councilmembers
FROM: Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator
DATE: September 14, 2005
RE: Approve 2005/2006 TRAC Drug & Alcohol Testing Policy
Council Action Requested:
Approve 200512006 TRAC Drug & Alcohol Testing Policy as attached.
Back2round Information:
As part of our annual TRAC management report to both MnDOT & Met Council, the City reviews the
drug and alcohol testing policy in place for transit drivers, to ensure compliance with state and federal
regulations. Attached is the 200512006 policy; there are no significant changes from the last policy
adopted in July 2004.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 2 of 17
CITY OF HASTINGS
TRANSIT PROGRAM
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION (FT A)
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE POLICY
Effective: September 20, 2005
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy-TRAC Page 2 of 17
INTRODUCTION & OVERVIEW
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Federal Transit Administration (FT A), an
agency within the DOT, have issued regulations (49 CFR, Parts 40 & 655, hereinafter referred to
as "DOT regulations") which govern the use of drugs and alcohol by mass transit employees.
The FT A requires employers that receive financial assistance from the FT A for mass transit
services, and contractors of such employers, conduct drug and alcohol testing at the times and
under the conditions described in this policy. The regulations apply to every covered employee,
including an applicant or transferee, who performs a "safety sensitive" function as defined herein
and to all employers who are recipients or subrecipients of funding under 49 U.S.C. 995307,
5309, or 5311, as amended or 23 U.S.C. 9103(e)(4). Please direct all questions regarding this
policy to Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk, Hastings Transit System's
Designated Employer Representative (DER).
PURPOSE
The purpose of this policy is to assure worker fitness for duty and to protect employees,
passengers, and the public from the risks posed by the misuse of alcohol and use of prohibited
drugs. This policy is also intended to comply with all applicable Federal DOT regulations
governing drug and alcohol testing programs in the transit industry. Redrafting will not be
necessary in order to reflect and be in compliance with DOT regulations. The City of Hastings
reserves the right to apply the amended requirements immediately, without giving prior notice to
covered employees and/or applicant or other persons covered by City policy, unless the DOT or
other applicable law requires such notice.
The goal of the City of Hastings' policy and the testing of covered employees is to ensure a drug
and alcohol free transportation and work environment, to reduce and eliminate drug and alcohol
related accidents, injuries, fatalities, and damage to City property. For the purpose of this policy,
any employee performing under the definitions described below will be referred to as "covered
employee. "
CRITERIA FOR EMPLOYEES SUBJECT TO TESTING
Under the City of Hastings Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy and DOT regulations, a covered
employee is a person, including an applicant or transferee, or an employee of a contractor who
performs or will perform a "safety sensitive" function for a recipient or Subrecipient of FT A
funding. All such covered employees are subject to the DOT drug and alcohol regulations. All
applicants for position as a covered employee will be notified of the City's Drug-Free Workplace
Policy (DFWP) at the time they apply for the position.
DEFINITION OF "SAFETY SENSITIVE"
For the purpose of this policy and the City's drug and alcohol testing policy, employees of
recipients, sub-recipients, operators or contractors who perform the following safety-sensitive
duties are subject to drug and alcohol testing and the terms and conditions of this policy:
./ Operating a revenue service vehicle, including when not in revenue service.
./ Operating a non-revenue service vehicle, when required to be operated by a holder of a
Commercial Drivers License (CDL);
./ Controlling dispatch or movement of a revenue service vehicle;
./ Maintaining (including repairs, overhaul, and rebuilding) a revenue service vehicle or
equipment used in revenue service
./ Carrying a firearm for security purposes.
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy-TRAC Page 3 of 17
A covered employee is considered to be performing a safety sensitive function (and subject to
drug and/or alcohol testing) during any period s/he is actually performing, ready to perform, or
immediately available to perform such duties.
DEFINITIONS
Drug: Drugs prohibited in this policy mean a controlled substance, as defined in
Schedules 1-V of Section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. 9812. The term
includes prescribed drugs not legally obtained, prescribed drugs not being used for prescribed
purposes, and any prescribed drugs not taken in accordance with a prescription. In other words,
medications prescribed for someone other than the covered employee will be considered
unlawfully used under any circumstances. Pursuant to DOT regulations, all DOT -required drug
tests must test for the following substances identified in 49 CFR 910.85: marijuana, cocaine,
amphetamines, opiates, (e.g. opium, heroin, morphine, codeine) and phencyclidine (i.e. PCP or
"angel dust"). The City of Hastings reserves its independent authority and discretion to prohibit
and test for other drugs, within the limits of applicable state law.
Confirmation Test:
Alcohol: A second test, following a screening test with a result of 0.02 or greater,
that provides quantitative data of alcohol concentration.
Druas: A second analytical procedure to identify and quantify the presence of a specific
drug or metabolite that is independent of the screening test.
Contractor: A person or organization that provides a safety-sensitive service for the recipient,
sub-recipient, employer, or operator consistent with a specific understanding or arrangement.
The understanding can be a written contract or an informal arrangement that reflects and
ongoing relationship between the parties. Providers of such services (e.g. maintenance service)
on an ad hoc or one-time basis are specifically excluded by the FT A and are not require to
comply with the testing requirements.
Covered Employee: Any employee, including an applicant or transferee, who performs or will
perform a safety-sensitive function for an entity that receives federal financial assistance under
49 U.S.C. 995307,5309, or 5311, as amended, or 23 U.S.C. 9103(e)(4). A volunteer is a
covered employee if:
a. The volunteer is required to hold a Commercial Drivers License (CDL) to operate
the vehicle; or
b. The volunteer performs a safety-sensitive function for an entity subject to Part
655 and receives renumeration in excess of his or her actual expenses incurred
while engaged in the volunteer activity.
DISABLING DAMAGE. Damage that precludes departure of any vehicle from the scene of the
occurrence in its usual manner in daylight after simple repairs.
Includes:
a. Damage to a motor vehicle that could have been operated but would have been
further damaged if so operated.
Excludes:
a. Damage which can be remedied temporarily at the scene of the occurrence
without special tools or parts;
b. Tire disablement without other damage (even if no spare tire is available);
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy-TRAC Page 4 of 17
c. Headlight or taillight damage;
d. Damage to turn signals, horn, mirrors, or windshield wipers which make them
inoperative.
REFUSAL TO SUBMIT: A refusal to submit to a required drug and/or alcohol test (also
"refusal to test") means any circumstance outlined in 49 CFR ~~ 40.191 and 40.261, including
circumstances in which a covered employee:
a. Fails to appear for any test (except a pre-employment test) within reasonable time, as
determined by the City of Hastings, consistent with applicable DOT-agency
regulations, after being directed to do so by the City of Hastings. This includes the
failure of an employee (including an owner/operator) to appear for a test when called
by the City of Hastings' ConsortiumlThird Party Administrator (CITPA);
b. Fails to remain at the testing site until the testing process is complete;
c. Fails to provide a urine specimen for any drug test, or fails to provide an adequate
amount of saliva or breath for any alcohol test, required by Part 655 or other DOT-
agency regulations.
d. In the case of a directly observed or monitored collection in a drug test, fails to permit
the observation or monitoring of the covered employee's provision of a specimen.
e. Fails to provide a sufficient amount of urine, saliva or breath when directed, and/or,
with respect to urine or breath, it has been determined through a required medical
evaluation that there was no adequate medical explanation for the failure;
f. Fails or declines to take a second test the City of Hastings or collector has directed
the covered employee to take (see 49 CFR ~40.197(b));
g. Fails to undergo a medical examination or evaluation as directed by the MRO as part
of the verification process, as directed by the DER pursuant to 49 CFR ~40.193, or as
directed by the City of Hastings as part of the insufficient breath procedures pursuant
to 49 CFR ~40.265 @;
h. Fails to sign the certificate at Step 2 of the ATF;
i. Fails to cooperate with any part of the testing process (e.g. refuse to empty pockets
when so directed by the collector, behaves in a confrontational way that disrupts the
collection process); or
j. Is reported by the MRO as having a verified adulterated or substituted test result.
Any covered employee who refuses to submit to a required drug and/or alcohol test or otherwise
fails to cooperate with any part of the testing process is in violation of this policy. Any covered
employee who refuses such a test will be subject to the consequences described in the
"Consequences for Policy Violations" section, including but not limited to removal from safety-
sensitive functions.
TESTS REQUIRED: In general, DOT regulations require the City of Hastings conduct, and
covered employees submit to drug and/or alcohol tests at the following times and under the
following conditions.
4. EDUCATION AND TRAINING
Every covered employee will receive a copy of this policy and will have access to the
corresponding federal regulations, including 49 CFR Parts 40 and 655. The educational
component shall include display and distribution to every covered employee of
informational material and a community service hotline telephone number for employee
assistance, if available In addition, all covered employees will undergo a minimum of 60
minutes of training on the signs and symptoms of drug use including the effects and
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 5 of 17
consequences of drug use on personal health, safety, and the work environment. The
training includes manifestations and behavioral cues that may indicate prohibited drug
use.
All supervisory personnel or City officials who are in a position to make reasonable
suspicion determinations will receive at least 60 minutes of training on the physical,
behavioral, and performance indicators of probable drug use and at least 60 minutes of
additional training on the physical, behavioral, speech, and performance indicators of
probable alcohol misuse.
Information on the signs, symptoms, health effects, and consequences of alcohol misuse
is presented in Attachment A.
5. PROHIBITED SUBSTANCES
Prohibited substances address by this policy includes the following.
A. lIIeaallv Used Controlled Substances are prohibited at all times in the workplace
unless a legal prescription has been written for the substance. This includes, but
is not limited to: marijuana, amphetamines, opiates, phencyclidine (PCP), and
cocaine, as well as any drug not approved for medical use by the U.S. Drug
Enforcement Administration of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Illegal use
includes use of any illegal drug, misuse of legally prescribed drugs, and the use
of illegally obtained prescription drugs. Also, the medical use of marijuana, or the
use of hemp-related products, which can cause drug or drug metabolites to be
present in the body above the minimum thresholds, is a violation of this policy.
Federal Transit Administration drug testing regulations (49 CFR Part 655) require
that all covered employees be tested for marijuana, cocaine, amphetamines,
opiates, and phencyclidine as described in Section 7 of this policy. Illegal use of
these five drugs is prohibited at all times and thus, covered employees may be
tested for these drugs anytime that they are on duty.
B. Leaal Druas: The appropriate use of legally prescribed drugs and non-prescription
medications is not prohibited. However, the use of any substance which carries a
warning label that indicates that mental functioning, motor skills, or judgment may
be adversely affected must be reported to the TRAC supervisor. The employee is
also required to provide a written release from their doctor or pharmacist
indicating that the employee can perform their safety-sensitive functions in a safe
and unimpaired manner.
C. Alcohol: The use of beverages containing alcohol (including any mouthwash,
medication, food, candy) or any other substances such that alcohol is present in
the body while performing safety-sensitive job functions is prohibited. An alcohol
test can be performed on a covered employee under 49 CFR Part 655 just
before, during, or just after the performance of safety-sensitive job functions.
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 6 of 17
6. PROHIBITED CONDUCT
A. All covered employees are prohibited from reporting for duty or remaining on duty
any time there is a quantifiable presence of a prohibited drug in the body above
the minimum thresholds defined in 49 CFR Part 40, as amended.
B. Each covered employee is prohibited from consuming alcohol while performing
safety-sensitive job functions or while on-call to perform safety-sensitive job
functions. If an on-call employee has consumed alcohol, they must acknowledge
the use of alcohol at the time that they are called to report to duty. The covered
employee will subsequently be relieved of their on-call responsibilities.
C. The City of Hastings will not permit any covered employee to perform or continue
to perform safety-sensitive functions if it has actual knowledge that the employee
is using alcohol.
D. Each covered employee is prohibited from reporting to work or remaining on duty
requiring the performance of safety-sensitive functions while having an alcohol
concentration of 0.04 or greater, regardless of when the alcohol was consumed.
E. No covered employee shall consume alcohol for eight (8) hours following an
involvement in an accident or until they submit to the post-accident drug/alcohol
test, whichever occurs first.
F. No covered employee shall consume alcohol within four (4) hours prior to the
performance of safety-sensitive job functions.
7. TESTING REQUIREMENTS
Analytical urine drug testing and breath testing for alcohol will be conducted as required
by 49 CFR Part 40. All covered employees shall be subject to testing prior to
employment, for reasonable suspicion, following an accident, and random as defined in
Sections 10, 11, 12 and 13 of this policy. All covered employees who have tested
positive for drugs or alcohol on a random, reasonable suspicion, or post-accident will be
tested prior to returning to duty after completion of the Substance Abuse Professional's
recommended treatment program and subsequent release to duty. Follow-Up Testing
will also be conducted following return-to-duty for a period of one to five years, with at
least six tests performed during the first year. The duration and frequency of the follow-
up testing above the minimum requirements will be at the discretion of the Substance
Abuse Professional.
A drug test can be performed any time a covered employee is on duty. An alcohol test
can be performed just before, during, or after the performance of a safety-sensitive job
function.
All covered employees will be subject to submit to drug and alcohol testing in accordance
with Part 655.15. Failure to submit to drug and alcohol testing is a condition of
employment and a job requirement. Failure to submit to a test as requested is in
violation of this policy. Any safety-sensitive employee who refuses to comply with a
request for testing shall be removed from duty and subject to discipline. Employees who
are suspected of providing false information in connection with a drug test, or are
suspected of falsifying test results through tampering, contamination, adulteration, or
substitution will be required to undergo an observed collection. Verification of the above-
listed actions will be considered a test refusal and will result in the employee's removal
from duty and discipline. Refer to the City of Hastings' Personnel Policy Sections 3.70
and 3.75 for ramifications of policy violations. Refusal can also include an inability to
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 7 of 17
provide sufficient urine specimen or breath sample without a valid medical explanation,
as well as verbal or written declaration, obstructive behavior, or physical absence
resulting in the inability to conduct the test within the specified time frame.
The City of Hastings will inform each covered employee if it implements elements of an
anti-drug use or alcohol misuse program that are not required by Part 655.
8. DRUG TESTING PROCEDURES
Testing shall be conducted in a manner to assure a high degree of accuracy and
reliability and using techniques, equipment, and laboratory facilities which have been
approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). All testing will
be conducted consistent with the procedures set forth in 49 CFR Part 40, as amended.
The procedures will be performed in a private, confidential manner and every effort will
be made to protect the employee, the integrity of the drug testing procedures, and the
validity of the test result.
The drugs that will be tested for include marijuana, cocaine, opiates, amphetamines, and
phencyclidine. After the identity of the donor is checked using picture identification, a
urine specimen will be collected using the split specimen collection method described in
49 CFR Part 40, as amended. Each specimen will be accompanied by a DOT Chain of
Custody and Control Form and identified using a unique identification number that
attributes the specimen to the correct individual. The specimen analysis will be
conducted at a DHHS certified laboratory. An initial drug screen and validity test will be
conducted on the primary urine specimen. For those specimens that are not negative, a
confirmatory Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) test will be performed.
The test will be considered positive if the amounts of the drug( s) and/or its metabolites
identified by the GS/MS test are above the minimum thresholds established in 49 CFR
Part 40, as amended.
The test results from the DHHS certified laboratory will be reported to a Medical Review
Officer (MRO). An MRO is a licensed physician with detailed knowledge of substance
abuse disorders and drug testing. The MRO will review the test results to ensure the
scientific validity of the test and to determine whether there is a legitimate medical
explanation for a confirmed positive, substitute, or adulterated test result. The MRO will
then attempt to contact the employee to notify the employee of the non-negative
laboratory result, and provide the employee with an opportunity to explain the confirmed
laboratory test result. The MRO will subsequently review the employee's medical
history/medical records, as appropriate, to determine whether there is a legitimate
medical explanation for a non-negative laboratory result. If no legitimate medical
explanation is found, the test will be verified positive or refusal to test and reported to the
Drug and Alcohol Program Manager (DAPM), the Administrative Assistant/City Clerk or
City Administrator of the City of Hastings. If a legitimate explanation is found, the MRO
will report the test result as negative to the DAPM and no further action will be taken. If
the test is invalid without a medical explanation, a retest will be conducted under direct
observation.
Any covered employee who questions the results of a required drug test under
paragraphs 11 through 15 of this policy may request that the split sample be tested. The
split sample test must be conducted at a second DHHS-certified laboratory with no
affiliation with the laboratory that analyzed the primary specimen. The test must be
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 8 of 17
conducted on the split sample that was provided by the employee at the same time as
the primary sample. The method of collecting, storing, and testing the split sample will
be consistent with the procedures set forth in 49 CFR Part 40, as amended. The
employee's request for a split sample test must be made to the Medical Review Officer
within 72 hours of notice of the original sample verified test result. Requests after 72
hours will only be accepted at the discretion of the MRO if the delay was due to
documentable facts that were beyond the control of the employee.
If the analysis of the split specimen fails to confirm the presence of the drug(s) detected
in the primary specimen, if the split specimen is not able to be analyzed, or if the results
of the split specimen are not scientifically adequate, the MRO will declare the original test
to be canceled and will direct the City of Hastings to retest to the employee under direct
observation.
The split specimen will be stored at the initial laboratory until the analysis of the primary
specimen is completed. If the primary specimen is negative, the split will be discarded.
If the primary is positive, the split will be retained for testing if so requested by the
employee through the MRO. If the primary specimen is positive, it will be retained in
frozen storage for one year and the split specimen will also be retained for one year.
Consistent with 49 CFR Part 40, as amended, collection under direct observation (by a
person of the same gender) with no advance notice will occur if:
A. The laboratory reports to the MRO that a specimen is invalid, the MRO reports to
the City of Hastings that there was not an adequate medical explanation for the
result;
B. The MRO reports to the City of Hastings that the original positive, adulterated, or
substituted test result had to be canceled because the test of the split specimen
could not be performed;
C. The City of Hastings may order a collection under direct observation of an
employee if the drug test is a return-to-duty test or follow-up test.
D. The collector, must immediately conduct a collection under direct observation if:
1. They are instructed by the City of Hastings to do so; or
2. The collector observes materials brought to the collection site or the
employee's conduct clearly indicates an attempt to tamper with a
specimen; or
3. The temperature on the original specimen was out of range; or
4. The original specimen appeared to have been tampered with.
9. ALCOHOL TESTING PROCEDURES
Tests for breath alcohol concentration (BAC) will be conducted utilizing a National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)-approved Evidential Breath Testing
Device (EBT) operated by a trained Breath Alcohol Technician (BAT). Alcohol screening
tests may be performed using a non-evidential testing device, which is also approved by
NHSTA. If the initial test indicates an alcohol concentration of 0.02 or greater, a second
test will be performed to confirm the results of the initial test. The confirmatory test must
occur on an EBT. The confirmatory test will be conducted at least fifteen minutes after
the completion of the initial test. The confirmatory test will again be performed using an
NHTSA-approved EBT operated by a trained BAT. The EBT will identify each test by a
unique sequential identification number. This number, time, and unit identifier will be
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 9 of 17
provided on each EST printout. The EST printout, along with an approved alcohol testing
form, will be used to document the test, the subsequent results, and to attribute the test
to the correct employee. The test will be performed in a private, confidential manner as
required by 49 CFR Part 40, as amended. The procedure will be followed as prescribed
to protect the employee and to maintain the integrity of the alcohol testing procedures
and validity of the test result.
A safety-sensitive employee who has confirmed alcohol concentration of 0.04 or greater
will be considered a positive alcohol test and in violation of this policy. For the
consequences of a positive alcohol test, refer to the City of Hastings' Personnel Policy
Sections 3.70 and 3.75 for ramifications of policy violations. Even though an employee
who has a confirmed alcohol concentration of 0.02 to 0.039 is not considered positive,
the employee shall still be removed from duty for at least eight hours. Refer to the City of
Hastings' Personnel Policy Sections 3.70 and 3.75 for ramifications of policy violations.
An alcohol concentration of less than 0.02 will be considered a negative test.
The City of Hastings affirms the need to protect individual dignity, privacy, and
confidentially throughout the testing process. If, at any time, the integrity of the testing
procedures or the validity of the test results is compromised, the test will be canceled.
Minor inconsistencies or procedural flaws that do not impact the test result will not be a
canceled test.
10. PRE-EMPLOYMENT TESTING
All applicants for covered transit safety-sensitive positions shall undergo urine drug
testing prior to hire or transfer into a covered position that requires the performance of a
safety-sensitive function.
A. All offers of employment of covered positions will be extended conditional upon
the applicant passing a drug test. An applicant will not be hired into a covered
position unless the applicant takes a drug test with verified negative results.
S. A non-covered employee will not be placed, transferred, or promoted into a
covered position until the employee takes a drug test with verified negative
results.
C. If an applicant fails a pre-employment drug test, the conditional offer of
employment will be rescinded. Evidence of the absence of drug dependency
from a Substance Abuse Professional that meets with 49 CFR Part 40, as
amended, and a negative pre-employment drug test will be required prior to
further consideration for employment.
D. When an employee, being placed, transferred, or promoted from a non-covered
position to a covered position, submits a drug test with a verified positive result,
the employee will be subject to disciplinary action. Refer to the City of Hastings'
Personnel Policy Sections 3.70 and 3.75 for ramifications of policy violations
E. If a pre-employmenVpre-transfer test is canceled, applicant will be required to
take and pass another pre-employment drug test.
F. In instances where a covered employee is on extended leave for a period of 90
days or more, regardless of reason, the employee will be required to take a drug
test under 49 CFR Part 655 and have negative test results prior to the conduct of
safety-sensitive job functions.
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 10 of 17
G. Applicants are required to report previous DOT covered employer drug and
alcohol test results. Failure to do so will result in the employment offer being
rescinded.
11. REASONABLE SUSPICION TESTING
All safety-sensitive employees will be subject to a reasonable suspicion drug and/or
alcohol test when there are reasons to believe that drug or alcohol use is impacting job
performance and safety. Reasonable suspicion shall mean that there is objective
evidence, based upon specific, contemporaneous, articulable observations of the
employee's appearance, behavior, speech or body odor that are consistent with possible
drug use and/or alcohol misuse. Reasonable suspicion referrals must be made by at
least one supervisor who is trained to detect the signs and symptoms of drug use and
alcohol use, and who reasonably concludes that an employee may be adversely affected
or impaired in their work performance due to possible prohibited substance abuse or
alcohol misuse. A reasonable suspicion alcohol test can only be conducted just before,
during, or just after the performance of a safety-sensitive job function. A reasonable
suspicion drug test can be performed any time the covered employee is on duty.
Examples of reasonable suspicion include, but are not limited to, the following:
A. Physical signs and symptoms consistent with prohibited substance use or alcohol
misuse.
B. Evidence of the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of
controlled substances, drugs, alcohol, or other prohibited substance.
C. Occurrence of a serious or potentially serious accident that may have been
caused by prohibited substance abuse or alcohol misuse.
D. Fights (to mean physical contact), assaults, and flagrant disregard or violations of
established safety, security, or other operating procedures.
An employee who refuses an instruction to submit to a drug/alcohol test will not be
permitted to finish his or her shift and will immediately be placed on administrative leave
pending disciplinary action. Refer to the City of Hastings' Personnel Policy Sections 3.70
and 3.75 for ramifications of policy violations.
A written record of the observations which led to a drug/alcohol test based on reasonable
suspicion shall be prepared and signed by the supervisor making the observation prior to
the release of the test results. This written record will be submitted to the City of
Hastings management and shall be attached to the forms reporting the test results.
12. POST-ACCIDENT TESTING
All safety-sensitive employees will be required to undergo urine and breath testing if they
are involved in an accident with a transit revenue service vehicle that results in a fatality,
regardless of whether or not the vehicle is in revenue service. This includes all surviving
covered employees that are operating the vehicle at the time of the accident and any
other whose performance cannot be completely discounted as a contributing factor to the
accident. In addition, a post-accident test will be conducted if an accident results in
injuries requiring immediate transportation to a medical treatment facility; or one or more
vehicles incurs disabling damage, unless the operator's performance cannot be
completely discounted as a contributing factor to the accident. The accident definition
may include some incidents where an individual is injured even though there is no vehicle
collision.
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 11 of 17
A. As soon as practicable following an accident, as defined in this policy, the transit
supervisor investigating the accident will notify the TRAC employee operating the
transit vehicle and all other covered employees whose performance could have
contributed to the accident of the need for the test. The supervisor will make the
determination using the best information available at the time of the accident.
S. The appropriate transit supervisor shall ensure that an employee, required to be
tested under this section, is tested as soon as practicable, but no longer than 8
hours after the accident for alcohol, and within 32 hours for drugs. If an alcohol
test is not performed within two hours of the accident, the supervisor will
document the reason(s) for the delay. If the alcohol test is not conducted within 8
hours, or the drug test within 32 hours, attempts to conduct the test must cease
and the reasons for the failure to test documented.
C. Any covered employee involved in an accident must refrain from alcohol use for
eight (8) hours following the accident, or until they undergo a post-accident
alcohol test.
D. An employee who is subject to post-accident testing who fails to remain readily
available for such testing, including notifying a supervisor of their location if they
leave the scene of the accident prior to submission to such test, may be deemed
to have refused to submit to testing.
E. Nothing in this section shall be construed to require the delay of necessary
medical attention for the injured following an accident, or to prohibit an employee
from leaving the scene of an accident for the period necessary to obtain
assistance in responding to the accident, or to obtain necessary emergency
medical care.
F. In the rare event that the City of Hastings is unable to perform an FT A drug and
alcohol test (Le., employee is unconscious, employee is detained by law
enforcement agency), the City of Hastings may use drug and alcohol post-
accident test results administered by state and local law enforcement officials in
lieu of the FT A test. The state and local law enforcement officials must have
independent authority for the test and the City of Hastings must obtain the results
in conformance with state and local law.
13. RANDOM TESTING
All covered employees will be subjected to random, unannounced testing. The selection
of employees shall be made by a scientifically valid method of randomly generating an
employee identifier from the appropriate pool of safety-sensitive employees.
A. The dates for administering unannounced testing of randomly selected
employees shall be spread reasonably throughout the calendar year.
B. The number of employees randomly selected for drug/alcohol testing during the
calendar year shall be not less than the percentage rates established by Federal
regulations for those safety-sensitive employees subject to random testing by
Federal regulations. The current random testing rate for drugs established by
FTA equals fifty percent (50%) of the number of covered employees in the pool
and the random testing rate for alcohol established by FT A equals ten percent
(10%) of the number of covered employees in the pool.
C. Each covered employee shall be in a pool from which the random selection is
made. Each covered employee in the pool shall have an equal chance of
selection each time the selections are made. Employees will remain in the pool
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 12 of 17
and subject to selection, whether or not the employee has been previously tested.
There is no discretion on the part of management in the selection and notification
of the individuals who are to be tested.
D. Random tests can be conducted at any time during an employee's shift for drug
testing. Alcohol random tests can be performed just before, during, or just after
the performance of a safety-sensitive duty. Tests can occur during the beginning,
middle, or end of an employee's shift.
E. Employees are required to proceed immediately to the collection site upon
notification of their random selection.
14. RETURN- TO-DUTY TESTING
All safety-sensitive employees who previously tested positive on a drug or alcohol test or
refused a test, must test negative for drugs, alcohol (below 0.02 for alcohol), or both and
be evaluated and released by the SAP before returning to work. For an initial positive
drug test a return-to-duty test is required and an alcohol test is allowed. For an initial
positive alcohol test a return-to-duty alcohol test is required and a drug test is allowed.
Following the initial assessment, the SAP will recommend a course of rehabilitation
unique to the individual. Before scheduling the return to duty test, the SAP must assess
the employee and determine if the required treatment has been completed. The SAP
should schedule the return-to-duty test only when the employee is known to be drug- and
alcohol-free and there is no risk to public safety.
15. FOLLOW-UP TESTING
Safety-sensitive employees will be required to undergo frequent, unannounced drug and
alcohol testing following their return-to-duty. The follow-up testing will be performed for a
period of one to five years with a minimum of six tests to be performed the first year. The
frequency and duration of the follow-up tests (beyond the minimums) will be determined
by the SAP, reflecting the SAP's assessment of the employee's unique situation and
recovery progress. Follow-up testing should be frequent enough to deter and/or detect a
relapse. Follow-up testing is separate and in addition to the random, post-accident,
reasonable suspicion and return-to-duty testing.
16. RESULT OF POSITIVE DRUG/ALCOHOL TEST
Any covered employee who tests positive for the presence of illegal drugs or alcohol
above the minimum thresholds set forth in 49 CFR Part 40, as amended, will be referred
for evaluation by a SAP. A SAP is a licensed or certified physician, psychologist, social
worker, employee assistance professional, or addiction counselor with knowledge of and
clinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of alcohol and drug-related disorders.
No employee will be allowed to return to duty requiring the performance of safety-
sensitive job functions without the approval of the SAP.
A positive drug and/or alcohol test will also result in disciplinary action as specified
herein.
A. As soon as practicable after receiving notice of a verified positive drug test result,
a confirmed alcohol test result, or a test refusal, the Drug and Alcohol Program
Manager will contact the employee's supervisor to have the employee cease
performing any safety-sensitive function.
B. The employee shall be referred to a SAP for an assessment. The SAP will
evaluate each employee to determine what assistance, if any, the employee
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 13 of 17
needs in resolving problems associated with prohibited drug use or alcohol
misuse.
c. Refusal to submit to a drug/alcohol test shall be considered a positive test result.
Refer to the City of Hastings' Personnel Policy Sections 3.70 and 3.75 for
ramifications of policy violations. A test refusal includes the following
circumstances:
1. A covered employee who consumes alcohol within eight (8) hours
following involvement in an accident without first having submitted to post-
accident drug/alcohol tests;
2. A covered employee who leaves the scene of an accident without a
legitimate explanation prior to submission to drug/alcohol tests;
3. A covered employee who is suspected of providing false information in
connection with a drug test, or who is suspected of falsifying test results
through tampering, contamination, adulteration, or substitution of a urine
specimen;
4. A covered employee who provides an insufficient volume of urine
specimen or breath sample without a valid medical explanation;
5. A verbal or written declaration, obstructive behavior, refusal to sign the
required DOT drug and/or alcohol testing forms, or physical absence
resulting in the inability to conduct the test within the specified time frame;
6. A covered employee whose urine sample has been verified by the MRO
as substitute or adulterated;
7. A covered employee fails to appear for any test within a reasonable time,
as determined by the City of Hastings, after being directed to do so by the
City of Hastings;
8. A covered employee fails to remain at the testing site until the testing
process is complete;
9. A covered employee fails to provide a urine specimen for any drug test
required by CFR Part 40 or DOT agency regulations;
10. A covered employee fails to permit the observation or monitoring of a
specimen collection;
11. A covered employee fails or declines to take a second test the City of
Hastings or collector has directed you to take;
12. A covered employee fails to undergo a medical examination or evaluation,
as directed by the MRO as part of the verification process, or as directed
by the DER as part of the "shy bladder" or "shy lung" procedures; or
13. A covered employee fails to cooperate with any part of the testing process
(e.g., refuse to empty pockets when so directed by the collector, behave in
a confrontational way that disrupts the collection process);
14. An alcohol test result of >0.02 to <0.039 SAC will result in the removal of
the employee from duty for eight hours.
17. GRIEVANCE AND APPEAL
The consequences specified by 49 CFR Part 655 for a positive test or test refusal are not
subject to arbitration.
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 14 of 17
18. INFORMATION DISCLOSURE
Drug/alcohol testing records will be maintained by the Drug and Alcohol Program
Manager and, except as provided below or by law, the results of any drug/alcohol test will
not be disclosed without express written consent of the tested employee.
A. The employee, upon written request, is entitled to obtain copies of any records
pertaining to their use of prohibited drugs or misuse of alcohol including any drug
or alcohol testing records. Covered employees have the right to gain access to
any pertinent records such as equipment calibration records, and records of
laboratory certifications.
B. Records of a verified positive drug/alcohol test result shall be released to the Drug
and Alcohol Program Manager, Department Supervisor and Professional
manager on a need-to-know basis.
C. Records will be released to a subsequent employer only upon receipt of a written
request from the employee.
D. Records of an employee's drug/alcohol tests shall be released to the adjudicator
in a grievance, lawsuit, or other proceeding initiated by or on behalf of the tested
individual arising from the results of the drug/alcohol test.
E. Records will be released to the National Transportation Safety Board during an
accident investigation.
F. Records will be released to the DOT or any DOT agency with regulatory authority
over the City of Hastings or any of its employees.
G. Records will be released if requested by a Federal, state, or local ~afety agency
with regulatory authority over the City of Hastings or the employee.
H. If a party seeks a court order to release a specimen or part of a specimen
contrary to any provision of CFR Part 40 necessary legal steps to contest the
issuance of the order will be taken.
I. In cases of a contractor or sub-recipient of a state department of transportation,
records will be released when requested by such agencies that must certify
compliance with the regulation to the FT A.
19. DRUG AND ALCOHOL PROGRAM MANAGER CDAPM) AND DESIGNATED
EMPLOYER REPRESENTATIVE COER)
FT A regulations require that a single contact person be identified to answer questions for
this policy. Any questions regarding this policy or any other aspect of the substance
abuse program should be addressed to the following City of Hastings TRAC transit
system representatives:
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 15 of 17
Drug and Alcohol Pro
Name:
Title:
Address:
Tele hone number:
Fax Number:
Secondary Contact
Name: David M. Osbero
Title: City Administrator
Address: 101 Fourth Street East
Hastinas MN 55033
Telephone number: 651-480-2350
Fax Number: 651-437-7082
A complete copy of regulation 49 CFR Part 40, as amended is available for review.
20. MEDICAL REVIEW OFFICER
Name: Dr. Stuard Hoffman
Address: PO Box 48709
Los Anoeles CA 48709
Telephone number: 1-923-936-3806
21. SUBSTANCE ABUSE PROFESSIONAL
Name: Dr. Gerald Peters
Address: 570 Asbury Street, Suite 300
St. Paul MN 55104-1849
Telephone number: 651-645-7558
22. CONSORTIUM
Name: Choice Point Health Services Division
Title: Attention: Barb Hurley
Address: 565 Braund Street
PO Box 67
Onalaska WI 54650
Telephone number: 1-800-523-5447. ext. 4600
Fax Number: 1-608-782-7794
23. DHHS CERTIFIED LABORATORY
Name: Quest Dia nostics
Address: 506 East State Parkwa
Schaumbur IL 60173
Tele hone number: 1-800-949-0163
09/14/05
2005 City of Hastings Drug Testing Policy- TRAC Page 16 of 17
25. SAFETY-SENSITIVE FUNCTIONS *
List the job titles of those that perform safety-sensitive job functions:
1. ClericallDispatch (2)
2. Full-Time Transit Driver (3)
3. Part-Time Transit Driver (2)
* or any others who operate a revenue service vehicle (whether or not the vehicle is in
revenue service), dispatch (anyone who controls revenue service vehicles'movement),
maintenance of a revenue service vehicle or equipment used in revenue service, security
personnel who carry firearms, and any other employee who holds a Commercial Driver's
License.
26. POLICY MODIFICATION
The City of Hastings has the right to modify this policy as changes in regulation or law
occurs.
Approved by the City Council of the City of Hastings this 19th day of September, 2005.
Michael Werner, Mayor
Melanie Mesko Lee
Assistant City Administrator
09/14/05
VI-I 7
TO: Mayor Werner and City of Hastings Councilmembers
FROM: Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator
DATE: September 14,2005
RE: Massage Therapist License
Council Approval Reauested:
Approval of a Massage Therapist License for Dwayne Collis to operate as a licensed
massage therapist at Hastings Family Chiropractic, 1266 North Frontage Road.
Backaround Information:
Dwayne Collis has made application for a massage therapist license, to be operated out of
Hastings Family Chiropractic, 1266 North Frontage Road. All application materials have
been submitted and a background check has been conducted by the Hastings Police
Department.
This approval will be contingent upon the successful completion of a site inspection by the
Fire Marshal, which is required by City Code, and payment of all applicable fees. If
approved, the license will be in effect through December 31, 2005.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to let me know.
CITY OF HASTINGS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 09-_-04
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS
APPROVING MASSAGE LICENSE FOR
DWAYNE COLLIS
WHEREAS, Dwayne Collis has made application for a massage therapy license;
and
WHEREAS, Mr. Collis proposes to work at Hastings Family Chiropractic, 1266 North
Frontage Road, Hastings; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Collis has had a complete background investigation conducted by
the Hastings Police Department.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HASTINGS AS FOLLOWS;
That the Mayor and the City Clerk be authorized to sign a license authorizing
Dwayne Collis to operate as a licensed massage therapist for the period of September
20-December 31, 2005 at Hastings Family Chiropractic, 1266 North Frontage Road,
Hastings, upon successful inspection of the site by the Fire Marshal and payment of all
applicable fees, unless revoked by the City Council.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA, THIS 19th DAY OF
SEPTEMBER, 2005.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Michael D. Werner, Mayor
ATTEST:
Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator/ City Clerk
(SEAL)
-' Page I ofl
. ~18
Melanie Mesko Lee
From: Melanie Mesko Lee
Sent: Monday, September 19,20054:13 PM
To: Mayor Werner (michael.werner@nmcco.com); 'alongihastings@comcast.net'; Danna Elling Schultz
(danna.elling@senate.mn); 'Tumey Hazlet (E-mail 2)'; 'Danna Elling Schultz (E-mail)'; 'Ed Riveness
(E-mail)'; 'Lynn Moratzka (E-mail)'; 'Paul Hicks (E-mail)'
Cc: Dave Osberg; Mike McMenomy; Mike Schutt
Subject: Green MiII--Agenda Addition Request
Attached is a memo & resolution for a tent at the Green Mill to be permitted for this Friday, September
23, 2005. The Green Mill is holding a one-year anniversary party this weekend, and has made request
to have a beer tent with music and food this Friday. They are requesting that this be added to tonight's
agenda for City Council action.
Hard copies of this memo & resolution, along with the site plan provided by the Green Mill, will be at
your seats prior to tonight's meeting. If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks.
MelaVlie Me5~o Lee
Assistant City Administrator
City of Hastings
phone: 651.480.2350
fax: 651.437.7082
website: www ~Ll}astingsJ"1'J}~lJ~
9/19/2005
To: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers
From: Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator
Date: September 19, 2005
Re: Liquor License Amendment for September 23, 2005 for Green Mill
Reauested Action
Approve the attached resolution approving a request to amend the liquor license of the
Green Mill on Friday, September 23,2005, contingent upon all requirements being met.
BackGround
Attached is a request from Tim O'Brien, manager of the Green Mill, for an amendment
to their liquor license to allow for a tent on September 23, 2005 (this Friday) as part of
their one year anniversary celebration. The site and condition of the amendment is the
similar to that which was approved earlier this year for Rivertown Days. Food and
beverages will be served, and music will be playing from 5:00 p.m. to Midnight.
Mr. O'Brien has provided a drawing of the site and they must provide private security for
the event (City policy is that the Police Department will not provide private security by
City officers when alcohol will be served, with the exception of during Rivertown Days,
which is a City-sanctioned event), as well as proof of insurance from his insurance
agent for the temporary liquor sales. The Police and Fire Departments must also review
the request to ensure all safety issues and any concerns are satisfied.
Mr. O'Brien still needs to remit the $5.00 City fee for this request.
.
CITY OF HASTINGS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 09- -05
RESOLUTION APPROVING LIQUOR LICENSe AMENDMENT
FOR THE GREEN MILL
WHEREAS, Mr. Tim O'Brien has presented application to the City of Hastings to
amend the liquor license to allow for a tent at the Green Mill on Friday, September 23,
2005; and
WHEREAS, a written request has been submitted; and
WHEREAS, Mr. O'Brien must present the City with a site plan as well as Proof of
Insurance of the temporary liquor sales and will work with the City's Fire and Police
Departments for final approval
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Hastings that the Mayor and Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk are authorized and
directed to sign this resolution amending the liquor license to allow a tent at the Green
Mill on Friday, September 23,2005, contingent upon all requirements being met and all
fees being paid.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS THIS 19th
DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2005.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Michael D. Werner, Mayor
Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk
(SEAL)
: e~~rl/J3/0S
........ r....... f/~n L Q:?S
I
,
..., . ,............
. i
I
QA~t MILL I J &;114/ j' set:el1ni ftl'eq
~ \ &;01 X 72/ S/JtJW f{lJc,e
" .. .... ... \ .......2. E IYJ e'/"rj'J) C V ex j ts I ),. f\J W Cdrl')~r 0 J= CCJrntIt J
..' ....' ( ;2. - s~ E to/'nt1.,r (j r- Cd~/
OfIFICB ......................... ,............................ \ ..... S e (JA f /fV qt.t4 r d @., ex i t z- ('6, m t2. ex rr ,)
~~L . 1 I I 't /
................_.... ..... ..........................j . f}4,sji~ 9' Cq,/} J (Cf4 ~IIJVS 0 /) Iv / /j Ct:I rilft
He I /
;.~/ :........... ~ C(, reP{ , (
..../.. /.j .~' . S ..J.,ll&12 *' ,SU"Ve J/ltl'1l,umtf{'5
~.s..._......_........_.....--;.~;(f.......I.....;' tJu t J~()r -?&I'VI' {"(, ~ .. . I
. I 1 i I1I1 I I I 131Y1of.-( J II)fJtjS I't /Jera., 01"1 /} k5
. " r I I I I I .,1.,.... ,.,....."....... [ I VI<..J (/V I v ~ . ;'
I ' . . I I I .. I . .. 'I
, . \ I.
:6 ,. .~ }';';:;::~~\"" ~ - _ . ::\ i\ t i.:.. $j tr) 9- e"Ld5 ~~/r}Jnl1hf
.:" """,; ". . \ " :;''' J PlUSI'- s1l1.rts @ f
: ...
! t FUTURE
I . t '. .." I
" ',' ...... COMMEflC",-, I
~. \ . ..' flETJUL : I \........
\ '
::'.:'. F . I' I ~ Ii: ~~.. \. ;.. '... ......! .,,','i ... '....... .~... n", <\ .m:.r.
. ......1.....,. ", . (;I ~ 7 .........', . .,' ....
'. . ". : i \ :. . 0" ~ ." :. : i
I r--...'. i : . He tIC; 11 A I' .
)\J1 \
Creel} ffU! Jlclst/Ikj5' '
~ '
\ b
:f )Jet7~bf5 ICe sldMte . ", " ....
~;reif,;eJe7/' ,fwtl1 b~ ....... ... ,,' ........
f ..........................
10'\' - o'
GREEN MILL
~ ....,.....
: ,-
.. ... ... "" ..... \ '......."..: ...
. '...... ,.' .
. _,.f " ..
o I"1'1C II i \ .
~AJL \ .......,........,....... ............................ .....,.....'::
i .
j;, .::' !..................... .....................
<~r ~,~ ' . . . . . . . \ :/,',., . .. . .... i d',
He'- ... Pu.... .-. l!"'" ....,.. ~ J ,,'
,. ...... - ~"
. . ~ '
.} . . ., .......-_.,.~..,... .... .-....... ... . .
_ \..\ :-...-'---..... ,~ \, '.,'5'::
. ' ~' ,. .! I ! ill \ i I . . 1 . ! .. ::
I \ ., "I I : 1 1 I I I . . I I I I I I I I . ! I ! I .,,~'...... ...1......, .
, .... .. ....:.."...,;.... ..' ....: ..:.... : _' ..' .... "1"" i" .
,6 "... ., ..... . . \ It' ...
: : / ".' . ,._,,~ : ,1.' _ ' :
i . ~- j..l II i'. ..,
r;:1 ~~. .~..,.. .....:,'..'..IIIIII.II.!II.;:II;I;'; 1\'. ..,
. . : I ..' . .. .' \. ..
. -
. ' ." i\ : :,:"'('i':'
~ . ..... FUTURE . , , ' ,5,
, fr::T 'ej;tq,U{1:l/}U. Zl/c., i, :.: COMMERCIAL I r" . , ! ! '.,
.ea/ -6/2. 237.nllf, 'I . RETjUL i '. .. \
UP <"7- ,,('I" . ~m"""""""-"-"-.'
.. -~~frEJ"I1 ' " ... .. , .' ,
'" :c.f'F? ,. ~
. . . 'r. rn 7 7
Page 1 of 1
Melanie Mesko Lee
From: Melanie Mesko Lee
Sent: Monday, September 19,20054:13 PM
To: Mayor Werner (michael.wemer@nmcco.com); 'alongihastings@comcast.net'; Danna Elling Schultz
(danna.elling@senate.mn); 'Tumey Hazlet (E-mail 2)'; 'Danna Elling Schultz (E-mail)'; 'Ed Riveness
(E-mail)'; 'Lynn Moratzka (E-mail)'; 'Paul Hicks (E-mail)'
Cc: Dave Osberg; Mike McMenomy; Mike Schutt
Subject: Green MiII--Agenda Addition Request
Attached is a memo & resolution for a tent at the Green Mill to be permitted for this Friday, September
23, 2005. The Green Mill is holding a one-year anniversary party this weekend, and has made request
to have a beer tent with music and food this Friday. They are requesting that this be added to tonight's
agenda for City Council action.
Hard copies of this memo & resolution, along with the site plan provided by the Green Mill, will be at
your seats prior to tonight's meeting. If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thanks.
MelaVlie Me5~D Lee
Assistant City Administrator
City of Hastings
phone: 651.480.2350
fax: 651.437.7082
website: wvyw,ci__hastlng$.mn. u~
9/19/2005
To: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers
From: Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator
Date: September 19, 2005
Re: Liquor License Amendment for September 23, 2005 for Green Mill
Reauested Action
Approve the attached resolution approving a request to amend the liquor license of the
Green Mill on Friday, September 23, 2005, contingent upon all requirements being met.
Backaround
Attached is a request from Tim O'Brien, manager of the Green Mill, for an amendment
to their liquor license to allow for a tent on September 23, 2005 (this Friday) as part of
their one year anniversary celebration. The site and condition of the amendment is the
similar to that which was approved earlier this year for Rivertown Days. Food and
beverages will be served, and music will be playing from 5:00 p.m. to Midnight.
Mr. O'Brien has provided a drawing of the site and they must provide private security for
the event (City policy is that the Police Department will not provide private security by
City officers when alcohol will be served, with the exception of during Rivertown Days,
which is a City-sanctioned event), as well as proof of insurance from his insurance
agent for the temporary liquor sales. The Police and Fire Departments must also review
the request to ensure all safety issues and any concerns are satisfied.
Mr. O'Brien still needs to remit the $5.00 City fee for this request.
CITY OF HASTINGS
DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 09- -05
RESOLUTION APPROVING LIQUOR LICENSe AMENDMENT
FOR THE GREEN MILL
WHEREAS, Mr. Tim O'Brien has presented application to the City of Hastings to
amend the liquor license to allow for a tent at the Green Mill on Friday, September 23,
2005; and
WHEREAS, a written request has been submitted; and
WHEREAS, Mr. O'Brien must present the City with a site plan as well as Proof of
Insurance of the temporary liquor sales and will work with the City's Fire and Police
Departments for final approval
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Hastings that the Mayor and Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk are authorized and
directed to sign this resolution amending the liquor license to allow a tent at the Green
Mill on Friday, September 23,2005, contingent upon all requirements being met and all
fees being paid.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS THIS 19th
DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2005.
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent:
Michael D. Werner, Mayor
Melanie Mesko Lee, Assistant City Administrator/City Clerk
(SEAL)
-
i
,
........ ..........
.
I
, .... .,............
. i
a' ...,
ID"'.O' I ~/(4/ j' set~tlili Ifr~q
OREItN MILL I
....TlfoIMIoH1' \ ,'f) I X 7Z I Sl7tJW Ft /}Ce,
_. '2 €.1>lVtfM1 ex its, I ~ tV W CtJr~e.r oJC C(}tn1.1
.' .' ". .. \
. . . ..... ;2. - Sf E Co/"n~.1' (j r Cd~/
OfI'F1OB _-H' ___ .____-.-- \ S e "" f/ 7y f41.t r J ~ e{ i t 2. ( ~ III ~ ex. T I)
IUETAlL.
._'- . ......_..- wI' I' l4.St it, 9- &:1.'1 J ((}It '/"l.11/er.:! 0 I) I,Y ,Ii (rI mtl
HC I
.' /. C/,rePt
'>/........... ~ /
... ..(.. /../ ". . . . s t4h r/) * syve JllJhJbt.Vftt;S
e.. _.-. .---.... --.:-;~;r-. '1-'. ',. rJu t JtJt)r ~NW1rj ~ ,
. I 1 i 1111 I I I 13 t.s /)I)~ /Jeer,. Or//) k5
, I j . I I II I I , " I -. W .r [ (Ct ,
I .. .\ ; :. 'I I
. . ." ,II ~'.t' .
( ~'U.\ :' ..~\,,)\ : - _ . :i. ""\i I;', }- Pi - s~rts @ Sfm 9- e'l.d5 ~f/);;"I!fhf
\ ." USlt
;' '1 "
: ...
, . .
; ., '. ...... FUTURE I
, ., ..... ...... COMMERCIJA.L.! . I
. ~ \ .... ...- 11ET~L. J " .. : i ,
I I..........
. . .: ........ ' '~
. '. . . . . '.' . : . ~ c.=n"-: ,If
. . .. . II \ .,
. I.... .
'. f" 1'1' II .: . :.. .... ....... ...' . ... ........
.... ....;...., . ,'.. ......., M '. J' 7
, r--.,' . . \ ~ : 'He' tiC \ h A
)\J/p -
D~
ereefJ fi/;11 IIQs1-/!kj5' .~
;
--'- .
, 9
f )Jel7~bf5 /CesldMCe - ' "
f)rrveWtif5 Re/fltj/~ optl') @
4J) times ftJ ,J';'; 6/'-
f ..........................
10'\'.0'
GREEN MILL .. ., .., .., ..,....
........... ..,
~
.............
. ..'
01"1'1011
R&TAlL ... .............. ....... ...........
...t.i.c...j............. " ...!
^
- ,.J
.... . ........ ' . ",
6 ( :i' ,:.' :: ..~\'.~ : -- .. ::~
..- ,.
~ l.... ....
\ 1;1 ~ · I =.
'.. ". I 1 I I , .
j. I' . . 1
i ":. :'. ~ ::.:
. ...... FUTUREt 't 'I"" i' . . I ,
f7:.J ~s"fqlt n:z/)~ 7J/C., ~ I ," COMMERCIAL I""'" ,"" ,
,;~(~ _ 6/2- 237. 73 Iff, . '1 RETAIL. \,............"...........--.-
'les.'t 6S1-lf3g-5JJQj , ..'",.. a;;;
I , . ' .. !,' ,If'f? T
_ -10-'" lli'l'
Memo VII-l
To: Mayor Werner and City Council
From: John Hinzman, Planning Director
Date: September 19, 2005
Subject: Public Hearing: R-2 Development Moratorium Ordinance #2005-
59.
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to hold a public hearing to consider the attached six month
Interim Moratorium Ordinance. The Moratorium would prohibit new construction,
additions, relocations, and minor subdivisions within areas of the R-2 Zoning District as
identified in the adopted Design Guidelines for Original Hastings.
CITY COUNCIL REVIEW
The City Council considered 1 st reading and scheduled a public hearing at the September
6, 2005 City Council Meeting. The following issues were discussed at the meeting:
. Accessory building and garages requiring a building permit should be included in the
moratorium.
. Porches and Decks should be included in the moratorium.
. Minor subdivisions should be included in the moratorium.
. The moratorium shall be effective for any complete building permit submitted
(instead of issued).
. Notification should be sent to all effective property owners
The attached ordinance reflects the above changes. Notification was sent to all effective
property owners (- 430 properties).
BACKGROUND
In 2003, the City Council adopted the Design Guidelines for Original Hastings as part of the
Heart of Hastings Master Plan. The Guidelines included certain design standards for the
construction of new structures and additions in and around the downtown area. The
Moratorium would allow the city to review amendments to the City Code consistent with the
Guidelines.
AREA
The Moratorium would effect portions of the R-2 District as indicated below. Areas
zoned R-2 outside the Moratorium Area are not affected. Parcels within the Moratorium
Area that are not zoned R-2 (C-3, DC, etc.) are not effected.
-
\}
EFFECT
The Moratorium would prohibit new construction and additions to existing structures
with the following exceptions:
(a) Any complete building permits submitted before the effective date of this
ordinance;
(b) Any building permits for the repair or replacement of siding or roofing
materials;
(c) Any building permit that does not enlarge the foundation of an existing
building
(d) Any zoning permit for the placement of structures or fences.
ATTACHMENTS
. Moratorium Ordinance
ORDINANCE NO. - SECOND SERIES
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING
A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF NEW STRUCTURES,
ADDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES, MOVING IN OF AN
EXISTING STRUCTURE, OR GRANTING OF MINOR SUBDIVISIONS
IN THAT PORTION OF THE R-2 ZONING DISTRICT INCLUDED
WITHIN THE DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR ORIGINAL HASTINGS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HASTINGS AS FOLLOWS:
HASTINGS CITY CODE IS HEREBY AMENDED BY ADDING THE FOLOWING
ORDINANCE:
Puroose.
The Hastings City Council is concerned about the continued issuance of building permits for the
construction of new structures, additions to existing structures, moving in of existing structures,
and minor subdivisions in that part of the R-2 Zoning District which would have the effect of
defeating the stated goals of the Design Guidelines for Original Hastings ("Guidelines") as
adopted by the City Council. The City Council is concerned that the continued issuance of
building permits for structures or improvements that are not consistent with the Guidelines will
defeat the purpose of doing the Guidelines, The City Council believes an interim moratorium is
needed to maintain the status quo until such time that the Council can evaluate the Guidelines and
implement, by ordinance, those recommendations of the Guidelines the Council deems
appropriate. The Hastings City Council further believes an interim moratorium is needed to
protect the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Hastings while the Council passes
appropriate ordinances. This interim moratorium ordinance is adopted pursuant to the authority
granted by Minn. Statute 462.355.
A. Aoolicabilitv. This interim ordinance shall only apply to and govern that part of the
R-2 Zoning District within the following described area:
Beginning at the intersection ofthe Mississippi River and the Canadian Pacific (CP)
Railroad Tracks; thence southerly along the Canadian Pacific (CP) Railroad Tracks to
the intersection with 10th Street; thence westerly along 10th Street to the intersection
ofTH 55; thence westerly along TH 55 to the intersection with Pine Street; thence
northerly along Pine Street and its northerly extension to the intersection with the
Mississippi River; thence southerly and easterly along the Mississippi River to the
point of beginning.
B. Scooe of Reeulation. During the time this interim ordinance is in effect:
1. Application. No building permits shall be issued for the construction of a new
structure or addition to an existing structure; or the moving in of an existing
structure on property within the area subject to the terms of this interim
moratorium ordinance. No minor subdivisions of property within the area
subject to the terms of this interim moratorium ordinance.
2. Exceptions. This interim moratorium ordinance shall not apply to:
(a) Any complete building permits submitted before the effective date of
this ordinance;
(b) Any building permits for the repair or replacement of siding or
roofing materials;
(c) Any building permit that does not enlarge the foundation of an
existing building
(d) Any zoning permit for the placement of structures or fences.
C. Effective Date and Term of Moratorium. This interim moratorium ordinance shall be
effective 7 days after passage and publication and shall remain in effect for six months
after the effective date or until this interim ordinance is repealed by the city council
whichever occurs first. The duration of this interim ordinance may be extended for an
additional 18 months as provided by Minn. Stat. 462.355.
D. Waiver of Moratorium Provisions. Any person who is proposing to build a structure
that they believe is consistent with the recommendations made by the Design Guidelines
for Original Hastings may apply to the city's planning department for a waiver from the
provisions of this moratorium. The planning department shall not apply the provisions
of this moratorium to any building permit application that is consistent with the
recommendations in the Guidelines. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Planning
Department may appeal to the City Council as provided by Chapter 2 of the City Code.
E, Penalties. Any person, firm, entity or corporation that violates any provision of this
interim ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be subject to any additional
legal or equitable remedies available to the city.
This ordinance was adopted by the Hastings City Council on this _day of September,
2005.
CITY OF HASTINGS,
A MINNESOTA
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Michael D, Werner, Mayor
ATTEST:
Melanie Mesko Lee, City Clerk
(SEAL)
MEMO VIII-A-1
To: Honorable Mayor and City Council
From: Tom Montgomery
Date: September 14, 2005
Re: Groundwater Testing Results
PESTICIDES IN GROUND WATER
On Monday, August 29th, I forwarded the enclosed email to the Council that contained
results from Dakota County's testing for pesticides in our City municipal wells. As noted
in the email, Well #3 test results showed levels of Cyanazine at 0.46 parts per billion
(ppb), which exceeds the Minnesota Department of Health's existing Health Based Value
of 0.4 ppb. (A Health Based Value (HBV) is a concentration of a groundwater
contaminant that poses little or no risk to health, even if consumed daily over a lifetime.
HBV s serve as interim advice issued for specific sites where contamination has been
detected and no standard has been set. The existing HBV for Cyanazine was developed in
1995. The MDH is currently revising the Health Risk Limit Groundwater Rule and
earlier this year developed a draft value, which raised the level to 1 ppb for Cyanazine.)
However, as a precautionary measure, Well #3 has been shut down and removed from
service until we know more.
WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS PLANNING
On Thursday, September I S\ City staff met with TKDA, the engineering consulting firm
that is assisting staff in developing a concept plan to address the City's water supply
needs and to address nitrate contamination issues. At that meeting, a draft concept plan
was developed to address immediate concerns about pesticide levels at Well #3; nitrate
levels at Wells #3, #5, and #6; and the construction of a new well to meet existing water
supply needs created by new development in the City,
Briefly, the concept plan involves three primary areas;
1. Drilling a new well at Vermillion Falls Park
2. A connection between Well #3 and Well #5, allowing blending of the water from
the two wells
3. A treatment facility for nitrate relief in Well #5.
First, by drilling a new well at Vermillion Falls Park this fall and
winter we would be able to meet our peak season water demand
by May of 2006 and not need to depend on Well #3 until we are
satisfied that the water is safe and well below all MDH standards. -
ern' OF HASTINGS
Second, Well #3 would remain shut down until a watermain could be constructed along
the North Frontage Road connecting Well #3 and Well #5, allowing blending of the water
from the two wells, which would lower the cyanazine contaminant level below the
existing 0.4 ppb Health Based Value (HBV). (A drawing illustrating the existing City
municipal well locations and the draft proposed water system improvements is enclosed.)
Finally, since Well #3 and Well #5 also contain the highest levels of nitrate
contamination on our water system, (with Well #3 showing a peak of9.0 parts per
million of nitrates and Well #5 peaked at 8.2 ppm.) The proposed improvements would
include construction of a treatment facility at the Well #5 site to remove nitrates from the
well water. This treatment system would remove nitrate from water in Well #5 before the
water is blended w/water from Well #3. However, the water treatment system for nitrate
would not remove pesticides.
MEETING WITH COUNTY & STATE AGENCIES
On Wednesday, September 7th, City staff met with staff from Dakota County
Environmental Management, Minnesota Department of Health, and Minnesota
Department of Agriculture to discuss the pesticide contamination results and their
ramifications to the Hastings water supply. At that meeting, City stafflearned the
following:
. The pesticide test results include the parent pesticide and its degradates -
chemical compound remnants created as the parent pesticides breaks down.
. Testing for the pesticide degradates which are a concern in Well #3 is cutting
edge science; the USGS lab in Lawrence Kansas appears to be the only lab in the
US that has the ability to test for these pesticide degradates.
. Cyanazine is a herbicide used for com and soybean that was introduced in 1970,
removed from the market in 2000, with its license lapsing at the end of 2002,
making it illegal to use after that date. However, groundwater seeps down for a
number of years before being taken up by a well, so old contaminants may be
found in well water years after they are no longer used on the surface.
. Only Cyanazine degradates were detected in the Hastings municipal wells, not the
parent compound. Degradates are generally thought to be less toxic than their
parent compound.
. The Health Based Value for Cyanazine of 0.4 ppb was developed by the
Minnesota Department of Health in 1995 and is thought to be outdated. The
MDH is in the process of revising the Health Risk Limits for Groundwater Rule.
A draft value of 1 ppb for Cyanazine has been proposed as part of this process.
The proposed Rule changes will be undergoing review by an external review
panel this fall. The MDH anticipates that the revised Rule will be publicized
sometime next year.
. Additional testing of Well #3 is recommended as only a single pesticide sampling
has been taken. Verification of the test result is needed to confirm the presence
and level of contamination.
. MDH has responsibility for testing municipal water, and does so regularly in
Hastings, but its tests are not able to pick up the Cyanazine degradates found by
the USGS lab.
PLAN OF ACTION
The meeting with Dakota County and State agencies resulted in the following actions to
be taken:
. City staff will update the Hastings City Council as soon as possible with
information learned from the September 1 st meeting with TKDA and the
September 7th meeting with Dakota County and State agencies. An informational
presentation about pesticides in the groundwater and resulting City actions,
including planning for water system improvements, will be included on the
agenda for the September 19, 2005 Council meeting.
. City staff is working with Dakota County, Minnesota Department of Health and
Minnesota Department of Agriculture to prepare a news release about the
pesticide contamination for dissemination on September 15th, when Council
packets are distributed.
. City staff is working with Dakota County, Minnesota Department of Health and
Minnesota Department of Agriculture to prepare common answers to expected
questions from the public about the pesticide contamination for use by elected
officials and staff at the city, county and state agencies.
. A draft concept plan for water system improvements will be developed and
presented first to the Operations Committee on the week of September 26th, and
then to the entire Council at the October 3,2005 Council meeting.
. City staff will work with Dakota County and the Minnesota Department of
Agriculture to sample and test Well #3 for pesticides this fall, winter, and next
spnng.
. Well #3 will remain out of service until such time as an interconnecting
watermain is constructed and water blended with Well #5 or the pesticide test
results are sufficiently below the Health Based Value (existing or revised as
appropriate) as to provide a reasonable assurance that the Health Based Value will
not be exceeded.
Memo VIII-B-l
To: Mayor Werner and City Council
From: John Hinzman, Planning Director
Date: September 19, 2005
Subject: 2nd Reading\Ordinance Amendment - R-2 Development
Moratorium Ordinance #2005-59.
REQUEST
Please see the Public Hearing Staff Report for further information.
Memo VIII-B-2
To: Mayor Werner and City Council
From: John Hinzman, Planning Director
Date: September 19,2005
Subject: Approve Stormwater Management Plan - SUP #2005-23 ConAgra
Floodwall - SACC Group (2005 Vermillion Street)
REQUEST
The City Council is asked to approve the stormwater management plan for the construction
of the ConAgra f100dwall at 2005 Vermillion Street. Review of the plan was required as
part of the Special Use Permit approval of August 1, 2005.
The City Council voted to table this item at the September 6, 2005 City Council meeting in
order to receive drainage information for the entire ConAgra Site. CONAGRA WILL BE
SUBMITTING THE INFORMATION UNDER A SEPARATE COVER PRIOR TO THE
MEETING.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the plan is recommended subject to the conditions of the August 30, 2005
memorandum from City Engineering Consultant, John Stewart (attached), including:
1) The location and installation methods for a silt fence must be indicated on the
plan to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director.
2) The three-quarter inch crushed rock within the drainage swale shall be replaced
by rip-rap similar to that in the proposed slope above the wall for a least a fifty
foot section above the proposed outlet area.
ATTACHMENTS
. John Stewart Memo - August 30, 2005
. SACC Group Memo - August 22, 2005
. Stormwater Drawings
fPBMl
CONSULTING ENGINEERS, PLC
MEMORANDUM
Date: August 30, 2005
To: John Hinzman Planning Director
Subject: Storm Sewer Review
ConAgra Site
Hastings, Minnesota
From: John B Stewart P.E.
As requested, we have reviewed the storm management plan for the proposed
retaining wall project at ConAgra in Hastings Minnesota. The report and
drawings provided by Paolo Sacchetti of the SACC Group Inc. show the drainage
patterns of the pre-construction, construction, and completed site.
The sediment and erosion control plan labeled "Plan During Construction Phase"
show proposed best management practices (BMP's) for the site. Specifically, the
protection of the riverbank is critical and the plan shows an "Erosion Control
Barrier" but does not include any detail pertaining to the specific make-up of the
barrier. Please require a detail or note be shown on the plans detailing the type
of barrier and brief installation requirements. (In our opinion appropriately
maintained Silt Fence would suffice).
Although the drainage swale may improve the drainage conditions of the existing
site it should not be completely made up of three-quarter inch crushed rock
placed on top of geotechnical fabric. A better option would be to use rip-rap
similar to that in the proposed slope above the wall for at least a fifty foot section
above the proposed outlet area. This should reduce the erosion potential of the
swale significantly. A Mn/DOT Type II Rip-Rap or higher would be sufficient.
The rip-rap/crushed rock layer should show a thickness of at least 6-inches.
Although no drainage calculations were included in the submittal, there is no
increase in impervious area and similar drainage patterns are retained.
Therefore, it doesn't seem likely that the proposed site would generate an
increased post development flow.
Please call if you have questions.
August22,2005 51 rc. ... p
Civil. Industrial
Project Managers
City of Hastings & Constructors
Community Development Division
101 4th Street East
Hastings, MN
55033
Attention: John Hinzman
Planning Director
Re: Storm Water Management Plan
Proposed Retaining Wall
ConAgra Flour Milling Co. - Hastings, MN
Dear Mr. Hinzman:
As requested during the previous council meeting, outlined below is our application for the proposed storm
water management plan for our retaining wall project. Jim Stremel of BDM Consulting has provided our firm
with the Storm Water Management Guidelines from the City of Hastings Code Book to ensure our submission
is compliant.
The intent of this storm water management plan was to address future deterioration of the rock face
(downstream from the new wall) so additional bank stabilization work could be minimized. This storm
management plan is not an entire review of the ConAgra site. This would be a separate issue and should not
affect this application,
Existina Site Plan
Under Section 15.06 - Subd. 2 a) - Existing Site Map, there are eight points to address:
1) Name of Applicant etc. - This information was previously submitted with the Special Issues Permit
2) Location of Property - Information was previously submitted with the Special Issues Permit
3) Existing Topography - see Drawing 0-1 Plan of Existing Drainage Conditions)
4) Streams in Immediate Area (see Drawing 0-1 Plan of Existing Drainage Conditions). The depth of
the Vermillion River varies significantly depending on rain water etc. Our firm has completed a survey
of the gorge to determine the water flow for a 100-year flood. This drawing was previously submitted
with the Special Issues Permit (see Drawing P-2 Retaining Wall- Stream Flow).
In the gorge, there is some vegetation beside the rock shore line that slopes up toward the limestone
rock face (see Photo P-1). At the existing Plant grade elevation, there is asphalt between the rail tracks
and building (see Photo P-2) and a combination of ballast and gravel between the rail tracks and rock
face (see Photo P-3).
Seaway Building - Suite 103 T: (218) 727-5200
802 Garfield Avenue F: (218) 727-5202
Duluth, MN 55802 saccgroup.com
9 rc>>... p
Civil. Industrial
Project Managers
& Constructors
5) Existing Storm Water Drainage System - There are two buried culverts (see Photo P-4) that run below
the rail tracks and discharge near the rock face (see Drawing 0-1 Plan of Existing Drainage
Conditions for location). It appears that these culverts collect storm water on the parking lot side of
the Plant.
6) Soil Types - There is no soil in the work area. There is ballast from around the rail tracks and some
course gravel over the existing limestone.
7) Vegetative Cover - The only area is a sloped section near the rock shore line. There are three trees
present near the shoreline (up on the bank). Because rock existing below the sloped area, the roots
are shallow. One tree has fallen (within the last month) and the other two trees are leaning toward the
river.
8) 100 year floodplain - see Drawing P-2 Retaining Wall- Stream Flow.
Site Construction Plan
Under Section 15.06 - Subd. 2 b) - Site Construction Plan, there are five points to address:
1) Proposed Land Disturbing Activities - The area between the rail tracks and rock face would be partially
backfilled with gravel and graded in order to mobilize I setup the crane (see Drawing 0-1 Plan During
Construction Phase for proposed crane location).
2) Temporary Soil or Dirt Stockpiles - The area behind the proposed retaining wall would be backfilled
with gravel. Gravel would be stockpiled east of the crane location in between the rail tracks and rock
face (approx. 40').
3) Site Erosion Control - A silt barrier I curtain would be installed along the rock edge to contain silt etc.
from flowing over the rock face and entering the watercourse. This barrier would protect the graded
and gravel stock pile areas. A silt barrier would also be installed along the rock shore line in between
the proposed wall and Vermillion River (see Drawing 0-1 Plan During Construction Phase).
4) Schedule - Erosion controls would be installed prior to grading I stockpiling of any material. These
measures would be installed as soon as our firm mobilizes on the site and would remain in place until
the project is completed.
5) Maintenance of Erosion Controls - The silt barriers would be checked on a weekly basis.
Seaway Building - Suite 103 T: (218) 727-5200
802 Garfield Avenue F: (218) 727-5202
Duluth, MN 55802 saccgroup.com
9 rc:>> .... p
Civil. Industrial
Project Managers
& Constructors
Plan of Final Site Conditions
Under Section 15.06 - Subd. 2 c) - Plan of Final Site Conditions, there are six points to address:
1) Finished grading - The majority of the existing topography will remain the same. The new storm
drainage plan includes for a swale to divert the storm water to the new outfall area (see Drawing 0-3
Final Drainage Plan). Any storm water behind the retaining wall would filter through the rip-rap I
geotextile fabric and be collected in drainage tile wI sock. This storm water would eventually be
discharged through weep holes at the base of the retaining wall (see Drawing P-1 Retaining Wall -
Section)
2) Landscaping Plan - N/A
3) Drainage Plan - see Drawing 0-3 Final Drainage Plan
4) Erected Structures - The new retaining wall (see Drawing 5-1 & 5-2)
5) New Paved Areas - N/A
6) Other Information - N/A
A representative from ConAgra will attend the September 6, 2005 meeting at 7:00 pm to answer any
questions. Should any questions arise from this storm management plan, please contact me ASAP at (218)
727-5200,
Sincerely,
SACC Group Inc.
Paolo Sacchetti, CEC
Project Manager
Seaway Building - Suite 103 T: (218) 727-5200
802 Garfield Avenue F: (218) 727-5202
Duluth, MN 55802 saccgroup.com
EXISTING CATWALK
I
f I I I
h'~ I I I
RIP-RAP ARMOUR STONE WITH SLOPE ./V""rl....f [Jl "'L >........ J
GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ~ 4 ~ "\ I J
.-<H...f[ll~ I
11~~ 1111
~ ~~ /0 I II
~ /T 1111'
~ J....'= I
CONCRETE BLOCKS 2'x2'x6' ~. rx ~. / I T I'
2#8 DOWELS EA BLOCK
[':'7 ~ "I II
";"': GEOGRID' ..--rI I
nONe, "" r ' - - n ~.. ~ ~ n -- A"111 I 1 111~ BEDROCK SURFACE
2' '):: J1 vrrl
cr LEVEL OF WATER-lOO '" STORM ~ r ': - - - ~ - - ~ - ~ - - - -- - - - ~..-11--- T I I
~ 24" CONCRETE RETAINING WAL~:';,~' T I /l111 I I'
8 EXTRA #7 & #4TIES @12" ~ ,.:... GRAVEL FILL /1 I I J
#5@lTEF ,.... 6'11 DRAINAGE TILE W/SOCK ...1 ~ I 1 J TII II II
~ ~. WEEP HOLES IN WALL AT 6'-0" /11 I II I
#7@12"EF :.' CENTERS
'.,' I -, COUPLING NUT
o .'.:-: ./ I I -'
N ~,~ 1111'
..q- 6"x12"KEY IN BEDROCK ~ ", t ;r V' DEFORMED THREAD RODS DRILLED AND GROUTED INTO BEDROCK,
f.- ':; AJ EMBEDMENT 10 FT, OR MORE - TO BE ESTABLISHED BY PULLOUT
,,' ' ...{ I TEST,
Via DOWELS@24"EF .;'. _ ~ I
EMBED 24" INTO BEDROCK:':,' \D ~ r~ I V -I
LEVELLING CONCRETE ',:: 'J .LI L ~ .--f I
v', ~'- 'l --111I11 I T I I ~ ~ I J
-of TT LJ Ill\ III III ~ I II IIII ! IT II1I I; I, ,1 II II IJ J ,I" I, I I T III I II I
SECTION THROUGH RETAINING WALL
[ J Retaining Wan Section : ""0",
Sacc Group Inc. ..... ...
ConAgra - Hastings &<.
NO. RE""'S/ONS BY DATE OWG No_ P-1 ro
fit
I
;r.:; ,p
..t.... ....,........."",...", ,::..."..,..", '::.: "::::::::'::::"::::'::::::":::'::::::'::':':::'~'f.:.:, ."..,
...... ....... .......... .............. ........... ...................... ....... ..........
'" ",-r ..... ....... .~.. ......... ....
/? ,-
#.;- ~ ..J
rJ ,,,,<i'
..J :I'?
, ,
,I
"
--s--
t .".""
-- .".""
IIEllRoa< SlClPE \
\ t.... :,,'"
I
, "
l,
l -----
t
~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ==-= ~~- ~: -==
~~ ~
--::::::= ::::::::- ---- -,-"....v"_....
ICM.( ,"....,.-0" EJCITNC DR_
PA1H (TO REMAIN,
.,~
EJCISllNQ ElEVA1KlNS
LEGEND
( J 0'"
PLAN OF EXISTING DRAINAGE CONDITIONS 21 Au 05
Sacc Group Inc, pun
ConAgra - Hastings Facility N~
NO. R(V1SlQNS .V 0'" OW< No. D-1 v'O
tl1
1 I
[]
~ ~
~l'~.!!.:!..:.",."."t!.nll~~=]..,.*~li..l.m;b., ... ..... .......
"" >If... ZT-r
#"~
(Y
/~
'"
;4>-
\ \
(, tI'
C ,"" ",t
. '.e . ...:..........:..... : ..~ '.~: ....:....:.:,;.. '-':', ......... .:t...........v..:! : ...:'._:~"~ 't"".. .........
.... " ';"#1 ..
,..
~ L IQP HOlD Af ,'-0" CDnPI1MlCIUGH WALL
;; ~. o:3~J~ ~~ ~ --=:::: -=- ;~ - ::::::~ "'----
=-
~MJS ~ ICM!: ,,,...,'-0- -"""./"'..,"~
..--
.....1H(lV__)
ROOF WATER " ~
- I I
WA1ER ~TlD FROIl ROOf AREAS ill IS llRAlNMROUQl (2) 0_ $POUtS DNlO TIlE ASHPHAlT ~ BETWEEN TIlE 8UIUl1NOS AND TIlE RAl. TRAO<S. TIlE ElCISTltC WATER llRAlNS ~L ...1IUIIWlE.....lM
INTO AREA.3 AND OVER THE ROCK FACE INTO AREA A NEW SWALE VIU. BE CONSTRUCTED 10 DtVERT OOF WATER AROUND THE RAI. TRAO<$ TOWARD tHE EXlSnNG OUTFALL [!J
_JaR~ ~__ ~
SUARf'ACE WATER DISlIG anA1KlNS
,aEr
WATER COLLECTEO ~ n-IE 90E OF SUILOINC ~ DURING A RAIN STORM DRAI\IS OVER lHE EDGE INTO AREA ~THERE IS NO ROOF WATER ALONe AREA[2I n-tAT DRAINS INTO mr. ONlY :l:- GUIHID II:lC\lC W1l4 LECENO
1OI1U ._
SURFACE WATER. SURFACE WATER WI.L DRAIN tHROUGH tHE ARMOUR STONE/GEOlEXTI..E FABRIC AND BE CQlUC N THE DfWNAGE TIlE ANO E\lENlUAU.Y BE OISQiARGED THROUGH THE KD' SWALE SECllON IIWlI: 10 QA.'<OT WlFIlU.
HOLES IN THE BASE Of' THE RETAINING WAlL ... tLCPE 'tr NJIl "
WATER SEEPAGE THRQUQi ROQC
EXlSTlNO WATER THAT SEEPS THROUGH tHE EXlSnNG ROCK FACE ALONG ~~ AREA~ BE COUEAClEO WITH ORAlNCAGE 11LE BURIED .. THE COMPACT GRAVEL BDlINO THE NEW
wALL. WA 1ER MLL BE COlLECTED IN 1HE DRAINAGE lILE AND OISQlARGEO HOLES THE OO-'STREAW END Of THE wAl OR AT THE BASE Of THE WAU..L
( J 0'"
FINAL DRAINAGE PLAN 21 Au 05
Sacc Group Inc, PlO'
ConAgra Hastings Facility No.
-
'0. REVISIONS ., 0'" ... No. 0-3 0
- I
t ~
~ '
'W ..... ~ %1"-7" ::::/::::::-:.:.:.::-:.~ ::.:. ::::::: :":':':',:::::::::::::. '::. '::::-:::: :::::; ..::::':':-:':-:':::::... -:-: ....... f{t'"
~~
#, ;. """""""""""""""1""""""""""1""""'1"""""" """"""""""""""""""."""""""1"'I""""""""""""""""""""'"
",.~ ~,.~,:,"":"'.~:~~~.?~~,;:}~:~~;,.;}~~.;.\ r,' t. I I I
. J..~,,:,...t'~'t'~4.r~.,.f."':r~~~"~"~1~~i...\..~,r:;:...~.p ADDCMAWLlONO'I1DI: I I I
,.;. ..~,..." ,".: -. ~'1"".. '"' . 0:. /_ #' ,.....""!\.'O\ '''r. ~ ... .'\ ....1'........ uva... MIlA
_",,""',.,,<.~',n.',\., , , ,
f;:j:"~~~~y'~~:'J,.r~~~~:f~~~~~i~~~ :~'.~~;" ,.... i i i DCIST1NO TMN CUl't9l$
~{;i~~~"'i'=",,!:i;~-~~f::'i;~:~~~-i'~~"";J"i~' J" ..~ cfI: I V ZI..I~O
. " _ u (::~'~i:~~i;~.i:~$;.!!:~!tj~~:ja;k:.:' :~., ~~\ .,,,. : : I
)0,,- ,~,,,oI.e~. . ~ .........' ,;~~~. .....'\:.c!..t".ro..,. e.-J. ..... ~~- '-"'l I 1 zr
. ~.,..".'"I';'-.:.~, :'''','>..,~'' ",:'10;/" :;"""~O;, ........~:... tti~\, ''', 11,Io, -J ~
....,~'l.#.lPt. ..'v.,;:a. ~~.",_...... f.'~\~l cI!' ...
~ '. :ilim~;~..::~:~:;:~..:~r~ 7'~;:;l~:~~';u~"r~ ~ f:':~ r' ~ ~ -
.. rfJ' ..... CClIlQ. IUMDI
.'-: .........":o:...::.:.....~~~....:.......oi..o!:'.-~.... .".:t....:.........;::.~ ,...:.!.:.,.~..~..':....~~...:. -II. ."
LIED' MCUI AT "-0" UI Cc.1IOE.S ItlO
~~~ ~ ~~ ~ :::c = - ::::~= =::: ~---=
~ :::=: ~ :::: - -
._"',......./''-oC>
ICALE ,~...,'....o" DlTWC DRAINAGE
PAnt (TO IWWN)
~
EXISTING ELEVAlICWS
~
[ J PLAN DURING eONs,"uellON PHASE : ,,~ ~
Sacc Group Inc. OJEC ..
ConAgra - Hastings Facility '''''.
NO. RE'flSlOf\lS BY DATE 0-1 0
,
ID#
MS Word Template
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)/State Disposal System (SDS) .
General Storm Water Permit Application
for Industrial Activity (MN G610000) - -.-,..
Minnesota
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Pollution
REM Division, Industrial Storm Water Permit Program Control
520 Lafayette Road North, St Paul, MN 55155-4194 Agency
Please refer to the application instructiolls as you complete this form.
Use tlte "tab" key to move through the fields of tltis form. Enter respotl!;eS using check boxes and text as indicated.
Use the "save ro'''featllre ill MS Word to .'Jave tltis template as a document.
A. Site or Facility Information
1. Municipally Owned or Operated Facilities All others skip to part A. 2.
For municipally owned or operated industrial facilities, designate single or multiple site pennit coverage. Single site permit
Ifmultiple sites, number of attached application forms:
For municipally owned or operated industrial facilities, such as vehicle maintenance garages, you must attach a complete application, properly filled out, for
each site. An authorized person with overall responsibility or an officially delegated representative must sign each application form,
2. Site or Facility Location
ConAgra Grain Processing Company A Subsidiary of ConAgra Foods Inc.
Name of Site or Facility
One King Midas Park
Site Street Address (Actual location. Indicate fire # for a rural site, if no fire # indicate location on a road and distance to nearest municipality. Do not use a P. O. box.)
Hastings MN 55033 Dakota
City or Township State Zip Code County
Clark Todd Plant Manager
Site Contact Last Name First Name Title
One King Midas Park Hastings, MN 55033
Site Contact Mailing Address City State Zip Code
651-437-3161
Telephone ((nclude ar(!{l code) E-Mail Address
Site Mailing Address (if different from the street address indicated above) City State Zip Code
Public Land Survey (legal description) information for the site. Refer to property tax statements, the county auditor's office or
county plat maps to obtain this information. The site is located in the SW quarter of the NW quarter of section 34 in Hastings
township. Township # 115 Range # 17
3. OWner Information
Is the site's owner information different from the site information provided above? If yes, provide owner IZIYes DNa
information,
ConAgra Grain Processing Compnay
Owner Name
Yount Anthony Safety Director 402-
595-7388
Owner Contact Last Name First Name Title Telephone (include area code)
Eleven ConAgra Drive Omaha NE 68102
Owner Mailing Address City State Zip Code
wq-strm3-S2w MPCA Industrial Storm Water Permit Application 10[6
PAGE 117. RCVD AT 9/13/20054:04:07 PM [Central Daylight Time]. SVR:CEPFAX02/10. DNIS:9432239. CSID:651 437 0133. DURATION (mm-ss):01-48 I
wq-strm3-J2w MPCA Industrial Storm Water Permit Application 20f6
PAGE 2/7' RCVD AT 9/13/20054:04:07 PM [Central Daylight Time]' SVR:CEPFAX02/10' DNIS:9432239' CSID:651 4370133' DURATION (mm-ss):01_-48
B. Storm Water Discharges
Does storm water (storm water and snow melt runoff, surface runoff, and discharge resulting from [giVes DNo
precipitation) drain off the site?
If yes, provide the name of the nearest water body (lake. river, stream, unnamed wet/and) storm water first drains
into, Vermillion River
C. Non-Storm Water Discharges and Permits
1. Does the site or facility have any other NPDES/SDS permit (for discharge of wastewater), a [8JVes DNo
Hazardous Waste Generator 10 # or any other type of MPCA permit?
If yes, indicate: Type of permit:Non Contact Cooling Permit or identification number:
Water MNG250013
Type ofpermit:Hazardous Waste Permit or identification number:
Generator for VSQG MND981099021
Type of permit:Air Quality Permit or identification number:
Type of permit: 03700020-001
Type ofpennit: Permit or identification number:
Permit or identification number:
2. Does the site or facility discharge noncontact cooling water (e.g. water used in power generation [8JVes DNo
and refrigeration, etc.)?
If yes, where does noncontact cooling water discharge to? (check all that apply)
o Municipal storm sewer 0 Sanitary sewer 0 Septic tank/drain field 0 Other
If other, please indicate where water discharges to (e.g. ditch. detention pond, etc). Vermillion River
3. Does the site or facility discharge process wastewater (e.g. water used in an industrial process - DVes [8JNo
food or other product washing)?
If yes, where does process wastewater discharge to? (check all that apply)
o Municipal storm sewer 0 Sanitary sewer 0 Septic tank/drain field 0 Other
If other, please indicate where water discharges to (e.g. ditch, detention pond, etc).
D. Prerequisites for Applying for a Permit or No Exposure Certification
1. Describe the primary activity at the site or facility (what are the principal products or services). The facility
mills hard wheat, durum grain, rye grain into flour with millfeed by products.
Indicate the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code for that activity Primary: 2014
(see application instructions for a list of all activities and SIC codes). Secondary:
(if applicable)
2. Is the primary activity or SIC code you Indicated in question 0.1. listed under the list of Listed
primary activities and/or SIC codes in the application instructions?
If not listed, permit coverage is not required for your site. Skip to part H and sign the Owner or Operator Certification.
E. No Ex osure Exclusion from NPDES Storm Water Permit
1. Was the site or facility previously covered under an NPDES storm water permit? DVes I8lNo
If yes, enter NPDES permit identification number (i. e,A OOOOOOOJ)
2. What Is the total size of site associated with industrial activity? 12.52 Acres
3. Have you paved or roofed over a formerly exposed, pervious area in order to qualify for the no DYes I8lNo
exposure exclusion?
Responding yes to this question does not disqualify you for the no exposure exclusion, However, the MPCA may use this
information in considering whether storm water discharges from your site are likely to have an adverse impact on water
quality, in which case you could be required to obtain permit coverage.
If yes, please indicate approximately how much area was paved or roofed over, Less than one acre
wq-strm3-52w MPCA Industrial Storm Water Permit Application 30f6
PAGE 317' RCVD AT 9113120054:04:07 PM [Central Daylight Time]' SVR:CEPFA1C02110 . DNIS:9432239' CSID:651 437 0133' DURATION (mm-ss):01-48
wq-s/rm3-51w MPCA Indus/rial Storm Water Permit Application 40[6
PAGE 4/7' RCVD AT 9/1312005 4:04:07 PM [Central DaYl!!!hl Time]' SVR:CEPFAX02110' DNIS:9432239' CSID:651 4370133' DURATION (mm-ss):01-48
4. Are any of the following materials or activities exposed to precipitation or storm water runoff, now or in the
foreseeable future?
a) Using, storing or cleaning industrial machinery or equipment, and areas where residuals from using, (gIYes DNo
storing or cleaning industrial machinery or equipment remain and are exposed to storm water
b) Materials or residuals on the ground or in storm water inlets from spills or leaks [gIYes DNo
c) Materials or products from past industrial activity DYes IZINo
d) Material handling equipment (except adequately maintained vehicles) DYes [ZINo
e) Materials or products during loading or unloading or transporting activities I'8JYes DNo
f) Materials or products stored outdoors (except final products intended for outside use, such as new DYes ~Na
cars, where exposure to storm water does not result in the discharge of pollutants)
g) Materials contained in open, deteriorated or leaking storage drums, barrels, tanks and similar DYes ~No
containers
h) Materials or products handled or stored on roads or railways owned or maintained by the discharger [gIYes DNo
i) Waste material (except waste in covered, non-leaking containers like a covered dumpster) I8JYes DNa
j) Application or disposal of process wastewater (unless otherwise permitted) DYes IZINo
k) Particulate matter or visible deposits of residuals from roof stacks and/or vents not otherwise !8JYes DNo
regulated (i.e. under an air quality control pennit) and evident in the storm water outflow
If you checked yes to ANY ofthe items in question E. 4, a - k, you are not eligible for the no exposure exclusion. Skip to
part G.
If you checked no to ALL of the items in question E. 4. a - k, you are not required to obtain permit covemge. Continue to
part F and sign the No Exposure Certification.
F, No Exposure Certification
I certify under penalty of law that I have read and understand the eligibility requirements for claiming a condition of "no
exposure" and obtaining an exclusion from NPDES storm water permitting. I certify under penalty of law that there are no
discharges of storm water contaminated by exposure to industrial activities or materials from the industrial facility or site
identified in this document (except as allowed under 40 CFR 122.26(g)(2)).
I understand that I am obligated to submit a no exposure certification form once every five years to the MPCA and, if requested,
to the opemtor of the local municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) into which the facility discharges (where applicable). I
understand that I must allow the MPCA, or MS4 operator where the discharge is into the local MS4, to perform inspections to
confinn the condition of no exposure and to make such inspection reports publicly available upon request. I understand that I
must obtain coverage under an NPDES permit prior to any point source discharge of storm water from the facility.
Additionally, I certify under penalty oflaw that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or
supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the
information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly
responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate and
complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and
imprisonment for knowing violations.
Authorized Signature Date
Last Name First Name Title
Skip to part H.
wq-strm3-52w MPeA Industrial S/onn Water Permit Application 50[6
PAGE 5/7' RCVD AT 9/13/20054:04:07 PM [Central Daylight Time] 'SVR:CEPFAX02l10' DNIS:9432239' CSID:651 4370133' DURATION (mm.ss):01-48
G. Certification of the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan must be developed to meet the requirements of the permit and to address the
specific conditions at the site or facility, The applicants' failure to complete the SWPPP prior to submitting the application will
result in the application being returned and the storm water discharges associated with the industrial activity will not be
authorized by the permit. Municipalities applying for permit coverage for multiple sites must develop a SWPPP for each site.
1. Have you developed a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan for your facility or site? IZIYes DNa
2. Who Is responsible for implementing the SWPPP?
Clark Todd Plant Manager
Last Name First Name Title
One king Midas Park Hastings MN
55033
Mailing Address City State Zip Code
3. Where should the annual permit fee invoice be mailed?
Site contact indicated in A. 2.
Continue to part H.
H. Owner or Operator Certification
I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attaclnnents were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information
submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person, or persons, who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I
am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of civil and criminal
_~al~~ ~ ~ Jlc;-/t; '3
.. ~~ ..
Authorized Signature Date
Clark Todd Plant Manager
Last Name First Name Title
Mail your application to Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, REM Division, Industrial Storm Water Permit Program,
520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, MN 55155-4194. Do not enclose any application fee payment. You will receive an
invoice from the MPCA, if applicable.
wq-strmJ-52w MPCA Industrial Stonn Water Permit Application 60/6
PAGE 617' RCVD AT 911312005 4:04:07 PM [Central Daylight Time]' SVR:CEPFA.l<02110 . DNIS:9432239' CSID:651 437 0133' DURATION (mm,ss):01:48
September 14,2005
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Council VI-6
FROM: John Grossman, HRA Director
RE: Approve investigation for Potential Quiet Zone in Downtown Hastings
SUMMARY:
The Federal Railroad Administration has adopted rules for train horns at public
grade crossings. The rules allow cities to enact local Quiet Zones provided that a series of
conditions are met. The rules pre-empt state and local legislation and basically require
local governments that want to eliminate horn noise to install safety equipment at their
own expense or close the crossings.
The downtown developers asked the HRA to look into the feasibility of a Quiet
Zone. The HRA believes that a Quiet Zone will promote the redevelopment of the
downtown area and enhance the quality of life on the east side of town. The work
requires an engineering consultant to provide the data for an application. The HRA is
willing to fund the study, with contributions from the developers, if the Council approves
taking this first step. The study would be completed in 2 to 3 months and provide
recommendations and estimated costs to meet FRA criteria. During the study period staff
will research funding options for improvements.
BACKGROUND:
There are two crossings on the main line in downtown See the attached map.
Each day 30 or more trains on the main line blow their horns at each crossing. A Quiet
Zone on the main line would make a noticeable difference within 3,000 feet
(approximately 8 blocks) of the tracks.
The process to establish a quiet zone requires installing crossing gates and signals.
The 2nd Street crossing meets the minimum level of safety, but the 3rd Street crossing
does not. The estimated cost of gates and signals is $250,000 per crossing.
An estimate of the consultant costs to prepare an application is $6,000 for the
downtown crossings. Sherman Associates and Three Rivers have agreed to share the cost
of the consultant with the HRA.
The spur line to Con Agra would re~uire a separate application.. There is one train
each way daily and five crossings: 6th 7th, 8 ,10th and 18th, Knowing that the cost of
making each crossing compliant would be $250,000, and the low number oftrains per
day, an engineering study of the spur track is not recommended. That study would cost
between $5,000 and $10,000.
REQUESTED ACTION:
Approve taking the first step by having the HRA contract for a Quiet Zone
engineering study of the Main Line by a qualified consultant, with the report to be made
to City Council. The Council would then consider whether to submit the formal
application.
SITE MAP
~~
MMt..J UN~
NOTE: Dimensions rounded to nearest foot, N
CopyIighl2005, Dakota County - i
This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one,
This m-ing is a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, and
state oIIices and other sources, affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes
only, Dakota County IS not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained, If discrepancies are
found, please contact Dakota County Survey and Land Information Department,
Map Date: September e, 2005 Parcels Updated: 812512005 Aerial Photography:
Memo VI-14
To: Mayor Werner and City Council
From: John Hinzman, Planning Director
Date: September 19, 2005
Subject: Resolution - Site Plan Modification #2005-50 - Supercenter
expansion of existing Wal-Mart - 1752 North Frontage Road - MFRA
(Wal-Mart).
REQUEST
McCombs Frank Roos Associates (MFRA) on behalf ofWal-Mart seeks to amend their site
plan approval to construct a +/- 72,000 sJ. "Supercenter" Addition consisting of groceries,
and liquor to the west side of the existing Wal-Mart located at 1752 North Frontage Road
as follows:
1) Approve a +/- 1,853 sJ. addition to the liquor box area along the west side of the
building.
2) Approve a +/- 6,922 sJ. addition to the stockroom\storeroom area along the north
side of the building. The addition would remove the need for off-site or external
storage.
The City Council approved the Superstore Site Plan at the August 15, 2005 meeting. Total
store size would be +/- 230,000 sJ. with the above changes.
RECOMMENDATION
Approval of the amendment is recommended. The changes have very little effect on the
overall parking and expansion of the building and do not change ingress or egress to the
site. The architectural elevations and landscaping are unchanged.
ATTACHMENTS
. Resolution
. Location Map
. Site Plan - Approved by City Council August 15, 2005
. Site Plan - Proposed Changes
HASTINGS CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS
MODIFYING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 08-09-05 GRANTING SITE PLAN
APPROV AL TO CONSTRUCT A +/- 72,000 S.F. ADDITION ONTO THE EXISTING
WAL-MART STORE LOCATED AT 1752 NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD, HASTINGS,
MINNESOTA
Council member introduced the following Resolution and
moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, McCombs Frank Roos Associates Inc. on behalf ofWal-Mart Stores, Inc. has
petitioned to amend City Council Resolution No. 08-09-05 granting Site Plan approval to enlarge
the building square footage of the proposed Wal-Mart Superstore Addition as follows:
1) Approve a +/- 1,853 s.f. addition to the liquor box area along the west side of the building.
2) Approve a +/- 6,922 s.f. addition to the stockroom\storeroom area along the north side of the
building.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF HASTINGS AS FOLLOWS:
That the City Council hereby approves the amendment to City Council Resolution No. 08-09-05 as
presented to the City Council subject to the following conditions:
1) All conditions of City Council Resolution No. 08-09-05 shall remain effective.
Council member moved a second to this resolution and upon being put to a
vote adopted by _ present.
Ayes: _
Nays: _
Absent:
ATTEST:
Michael D. Werner, Mayor
Melanie Mesko Lee
City Clerk
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of resolution presented to and
adopted by the City of Hastings, County of Dakota, Minnesota, on the 19th day of September, 2005,
as disclosed by the records ofthe City of Hastings on file and of record in the office.
Melanie Mesko Lee
City Clerk
(SEAL)
This instrument drafted by:
City of Hastings (JWH)
101 4th S1. East
Hastings, MN 55033
~
~ Wal-Mart
0 ~
,.
Supercenter
~
r l
r Legend
_ Buildings
Roads
. .
Legend Site Location 0 Parcels
o Parcels
. Water
Zoning
OA Map Date: July 21,2005
C-1 N
. C-2 . W*E
. C-3
. C-4
. F-W
crn'OV_S S
1-1
. 1-2
. 0-1 Site Location
. P-I
o R-1
o R-2
. R-3
. R-4
. R-5
. R-6
o ROW
. WAT
j I - - ~ -- : ~ = ~ pr~D~~e~I~~ki~: ~n~IYSiS "'
I - ~ = ~ - - BUILDING AREA 149,623 SF l'
e:; e:; - I BUILDING AREA 71,906 SF '" u
Ie:; e:; I TOTAL AREA AFTER EXPANSION 221,529 SF ~ a; ~
~ ~~~~
C I STANDARD SPACES 937 SPACES .... iil ~ I!!
I PROOF OF PARKING 29 SPACES 15 I 12 '"
I ACCESSIBLE SPACES 26 SPACES Ii; I'f ~ ~
r TOTAL PARKING 992 SPACES >- i ~ >;
- - - --+- - - - - - + - - - RATIO 4,5/1,000 S,F, ~;! ~ a
I "(PAltKllG RAllO EXa..UOlNC PROOf Of PARDta - "'/1,000 5.;.) ::IE ~ CI::
l.w !, ~a..
I 1......CIlCUl.A_...CIIltoT.....GIIOIi'.".fIOO'IAGI..--. -<
I :t...._fl'lDllD'_ru./l_u.) 3t:
~_'_..IIlUI 1Irt.... ',*11.
,'" 00\1< J"'~
\.__-..--'-c:........ ./' I 1~-=:..=l::r.-'Sf___=;__f'lNa_
I ...___IOfH.._...._.1oCItI.
1Woll..........,...........U' J'I'Ol<m'__ ........
1 ==_=ll. :?....=llll'. f~
: ...,-- ...,au ~ Un
I ACREAGE SUMMARY i 1111
C-195E-SGR-OR I PARCELS ACREAGE I iE I~
EXISTING WAL*MART STORE I I
-.~~_1lt)o14U2J. WALMART _ LOT 1 . BLOCK 1 21.59% If
I WALMART - LOT 1 , BLOCK 2 O,7U .
TOTAL 22,3H
~
::!; 'P GAS LEASE AREA 0,8;'
Oz I
a:: < c.nNO__~_ C-41llC1Ci11M..._cona
!~ O?: ==:~~DI~;:TA ~~!~~
~ ~ _IMDNOAIlAo 21t.DlU.
~ Z Z I 1WJIMO.-..-s1lllD(C-4): "",MAfIDI'~~DUlJI[O .
< W IYDl'lIl..Ol'tCIdN:lEEllOlT
~ ~ 0 I "=.."'1'1.... d' 1111
F=-~ ....._~.... hI
r;:: ~ ~ ~ ~--=...... - :tl'
r !;i 0 z I Iii
II z~ffi Jhl J
I - 0 > I tJ'i ...,
II ~g I fl~ J
I I !i~1 II
I I
I I
I
I I
I _ ... I
I ~.~~~_ ,I I LEQEHOFOI\ I
I ' , I I PROPOSED 'MPIIOVEMEHT$ ~;
I COMMERCIAL III I ---' ~__ I
I I I I (VACANT) ~ II I I I ---' -.;.._ ,
I I I I OUllOT A II \ ~I: I I == ::::a.UIC.....1I
I (4053110 CUlINlDCUT1III
I ".>T~ ~"'" Itilll R I I . ~w~n
I' I I I vnll!i . :=~~-'
I iLl lilu' \' I rm ._.._,
.- -. _ -=".~=" -. _ IIIII'L._ . .:. ~w_ !
- _I-h. .-L - - -- - - - - - - -/ - - - - - - II I "= - - - -y 0 ...... .._,
.I f'\" """':_"~"";""_~__ / '''l:~~t~tdNOOT PARCEl 258F" --=- ' D -""TllfII(Al.COAT
--=-"" ~-~'-=--~=~=~-~=~=--~'~'':'-::'~=.:o<=-_-_::::_-=-_-_::::_-=-_-_::::_-=-_-_::::",- - _~___~_-_~_~'0-_~_~~_ Ei3 I
.-------+--------------------------------------~ (~' :.,.,~:==:.IlO. J
TRUNK HIGHWAY-fio,--ss------ -'-1_ --~_....... ,
I MN /OOT RW PLA T NO 79-87 . - - .~ '" C-20-'
I /t. t8: c....,~(:aottlMlrU) ----JI.
SCAU: .. fEET - IU: , 141"
--.-
6(i~in.1 /tPPffAJtJd P1M
~ liS- Jotr
..._~ -,,--""..'- ; i
NV1d 31IS rrno-at.AWMI' WIll_ _1'_ -., 10 ;
'~Nl 'S3~OJS U:N~.'YM ::.:;~~ WU .~- ~ C'
'I1CS:JNNi"'StlNUIlYM ,.,_-r__. YQ '_. ......lie!, I
SO-~Ltl* 31101S l~Vr'i'lVM ..........-.-...., ..- ,.". . .,. i
. I , -'. I Ii' · I ~II
;!Ji! !!,!; i' ; jl, i I ~ I: ,i I}. I _' I ~ i
!I!!!j"i!!jj. d I Ill!; !: d;i lij HIli, I h ill I 8 '"
l iill',! ill 1'1 ! ! Ill! II ill' ! Ii n n ~1 ! 1\: P !I~i I I 11', i i Ii I n !i i I . ~ 1!
a i 'It i ~;i 1 J t ;; e (~ ~ I s ~ I ~i! ~ ~ p!l ~ lit, ~ a ;. ~ It ~ ~ :1 r ~ 11 l i f i .
'l!'!::I"l'i,ll!ld d! illoK:! ~i ilr1ill lill;! I !I'II'II:.!!!1 !"ll,:l,lh!!i \,1,;,111,1
. ~I ~~1I 11,_ J ; ~ I' l!' ~ a - l! II t ~,l ~ -: ~ } 1/ I'~~ b i 's! !i Ii Ji It 11 Ii x i y ~ . c" i .
! jl:b/ I!i I! i., ~! '! I !:.! :, : / 11111 il l jl ,;,; :11 I' I I il:l, i': ; : Iii II i 11 i I iil l! ..... ~ "11"""" I>-:l'
Illl!!! I!ll!, ill ill! ill I I I'll I I !i j! d I ~I! Ii III il Ill! ~mi III ~III i ili ! i i II : Iii ill; I i ill! II ! i 1
j 11:1<1 ~!ll. 'I'. I!, . !' i -! . '!l I Ii 1 II IIi ! '1 i 'I i i.-! ~ I'" '" "G@""e"'.""""'''''''''''''''(l)'''IO.''''''i'-III-,
il"!.I' 1\':11 !I !I",lsl, rll! ' 11.!il!!! t, ' '11" ; III "i! i i
I; i!!li! I;l n i (' i II :,l III Hi!; l ; i: d I Ii 1l~'I' .!l i I:! lill 'II l" ',','j , " !II! ! HI Ii: m I i
II .~.~I rl! I Ii! ~ = r ; 'i 1:r ~. u toO ~.. ! . j. t j t .
lillli!!!I'I!! ill! i Ii ij i ! i II i ! 11 !Ill i I !. i! I ill! Ii ! !; ill!! I ~il!!: I~ i: l:ll Ii III ill is! ~il' 11 III i ! I ~ I @ ~ H
I 'ii'illll j' 'i ' 'i III :; I" I "II ! I " , ' 'II! I ,I I III PI; pi .', I' , I j. I 'I . I! II I Il
Iflll!',.I!I,1l dill ;1 oil ! ! l'l! I II H d j! ',' ! ! I!! n:.! : ill;l! j II Pili ;1 /!ql! I : 'II!' HII~1 i! I! !
~2 'lI:r1 l~ . I ! ,_ -1 Iii I t tit. RU t ~,,~ Iw " I, f 11 1 ~I. j;1! "'ill 1~ <I" ~ = t 1
Illi!!!:Uii!!Il!ii!l!!iII!l lli!lilll!li!l~IlI!!i Iii II!! i...!: II il!! ill!!!r.l i!liilllin~ i! Ii: :iill i! lIJi II
~ Ii lilm~llllli I!I ! i :, l!llll! I! Ihl!lill h II !I~ II 11 iil! I i',I, Ii ;1 iidHl1 ~! u!? : ! ~ !~H IIi II dH~ ~i!Hi R !nilh, l ! ! !I; IIDfl~hJl lrm
l~i:J:',; ~I/~~..!f~'~!;~~;~a~r~ ;::~~~'il"~~U~~ ~~=~ili~h dt i !~0 ee e 900 000e0€ e @€l@G ~mmgn1ilttij_.m
- , . !! ~ I,.,
I il'tp ~!~lq! II I!,l '!,..:,
~&13"&';~ itli'~ ,~.qIP <illll
im Hi!~a.J1i!mi.a Illl!!
i IIII II !~ : !llrnm~m" ': .. , : . jl!lhl
iiiliii lil:~ ' 'i'."";" Ill!!!
. ~ ~ ~~~l\~
r~!l' 'I' i~J.~1!
J F " v ~l'! _ e'
1 (l:I31N3:J lN3VlNl:I3A01l x Iii t 'll ~ ..,1;; ~, 'l H l,t I
-I i 't.. "d~ ~I!I iL . ~
I A1NnO:J V10~Va) ~.~I~~~~~!~~!III~~!ll !ll
ii lVNOIln.J.IlSNI .o.r..t..oo".'""" J~"
'\...~ E~ I: j I
~ ~ /
I
I "
I 4h
I a
I ..c,
I U ~
:' <~ I l~
...:J -e ~
....u ~ 5 ~~
-!S' <:> "'~"
() () 99~ ffi.,. a;!.~ \ ..
..~ ::l;'-" g ....
::l;:~ ~_
8'! ~
I ~.
--: ~
- - - -I
I
I
I
I
I
: I
~cs-
~~
II
MEMORANDUM VIII-C-l
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers
FROM: Dave Osberg, City Administrator
DATE: September 15, 2005
SUBJECT: Stelutec Foundation Raffle Permit
Mr. Anthony Price has requested City Staff to place on the agenda the reconsideration
of his raflle permit that was previously rescinded by the City Council. Staffhas advised
Mr. Price to reapply for a "new" permit through the State and City, as the earlier permit
application had certain complications, resulting in the suggestion he apply for a totally
"new" permit. As of this writing, the City Staffhas been unsuccessful in convincing Mr.
Price to submit such an application, and he will likely appear before the City Council
asking that the earlier permit be reauthorized. Representatives from the Police
Department will be present at the meeting on Monday September 19th, to provide further
information. There may be further developments on this topic leading up to the City
Council me ing on Monday night.
HASTINGS RECEIVED
SEP 1 9 Z005
POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMO
TO: Mayor Mike Werner & City Council Members
CC: Police Chief Mike McMenomy, City Administrator Dave Osberg &
Assistant City Administrator Melanie Mesko Lee
FROM: Lt. Kegley
DATE: September 16, 2005
SUBJECT: Ste Lu Tec Foundation Raffle Investigation
As you all are aware resolution number 04-09-05, the Charitable Gambling Resolution, was
rescinded on August 1lth, 2005, An investigation was conducted into the gambling
practices of the Ste Lu Tec Foundation; the investigation was conducted by the State of
Minnesota Gambling Control Board Agents, Agents, from the Alcohol & Gambling
Enforcement, and the Hastings Police Department.
The investigation consisted of reviews of the original applications for the foundation to
conduct a lawful gambling raffle, the practices of the foundation during the raffle and the
foundations record keeping practices. Interviews were conducted with the President ofthe
Ste Lu Tec Foundation Mr. Anthony Price and the Vice President of the Ste Lu Tec
Foundation Anna Modeo-Price.
Through this investigation we have learned that a house is not being given away in this
raffle as it appears in the web page for the Ste Lu Tec Foundation. It is actually the grand
prize in a different Ste Lu Tec Foundation fundraiser. Please see the attached web pages
for the description of the prize and the photo of the house, We did learn that the Ste Lu
Tec Foundation was giving away a new 1996 Harley Davidson Road King XL Tor $15,000.
As this investigation progressed we learned that the motorcycle had been parked outside
of several businesses in town, one including the Old Mill Pawn Shop. The motorcycle was
parked on a trailer attached to a vehicle. On the trailer was a sign advertising raffle tickets
to win the motorcycle. While interviewing Mr Price about the ownership ofthe motorcycle,
as the prizes need to be owned by the Ste Lu Tec Foundation in order to be used as
prizes, we learned that there is no title for the motorcycle. He was unable to provide us
with the owner's name and contact information for the owner of the motorcycle and did
inform us that the motorcycle has never been registered in any state that he knows of.
Gambling rules do require that prizes are owned by the group having the raffle. During this
investigation we learned that the motorcycle was not a prize for the raffle, Mr. Price, Ste Lu
Tec President advised us that the actual prize for the raffle was $15,000 and if you
happened to be the grand prize winner you could elect to purchase the motorcycle for the
$15,000.
Through this investigation and numerous places we learned that raffle tickets could be
purchased on-line using credit cards, This is a violation of the state gambling laws. When
interviewed about this, Mr Price advised that he had no idea how many raffle tickets had
been purchased on-line or by credit card, Mr Price advised they have only sold several
hundred tickets for the raffle, Price stated he and two part-time people are the ones selling
tickets, Investigation showed 30,000 tickets were printed for the raffle. The original raffle
was 53 days long, the drawing being held on July 9th. Further interviewing of Mr Price, we
learned that the organization's raffle was not being conducted in compliance with
applicable statutes and rules including the log of tickets dispensed to members for sales
and how many tickets were returned or sold to date. Mr. Price was also unable to provide
if and how the public and the ticket purchasers were notified of the raffle drawing date
extension.
The state Gambling Control Board required the Ste Lu T ec Foundation to respond to ten
items that were found not to be in compliance after Mr, Price advised that he did not have
them. There were several other requests made by the Gambling Control Board specific to
the accounting and accountability of both tickets and funds for the organization. It is my
understanding at this time that some of the financial matters are still in question as to the
tax status of the Ste Lu Tec Foundation, As Mr. Price advised us he still has not applied
for a non-profit tax except status for the foundation.
Based on the investigation which is briefly stated above, I believe that the City of Hastings
at this time should not reconsider the previous raffle permit due to the integrity issues. The
Ste Lu Tec Foundation has given the Minnesota Gambling Control Board a plan to notify
individuals of a cancellation and reimbursement of the participants.
If you have any questions regarding the investigation, please feel free to contact me.
ft.
,'itelutec,org Page 2 of 3
global community with
help for parents when your
children are hospitalized.
Feel free to email us any questions.
WEARE GIVING AWAY A
HOUSE!!!!!!
(SEE THE SEMI CLASSIC GOLF SHOOT OUT PAGE FOR DETAILS ON THE HOUSE)
CALL OUR TOLL FREE NUMBER FOR YOUR
RAFFLE TICKETS!
(YOU CAN'T WIN IF YOU DON'T PLA Y)
RAFFLE TICKETS ARE $10.00 EACH, AND CREDIT CARDS ARE ACCEPTED*
1.866.867 .6296
The SteLuTec Foundation does not make decisions on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national
origin, disability, or age.
$,75 SHIPPING AND HANDLING CHARGE APPLIES PER TICKET
Maintained by Friendly 'Puters, LLC
Copyright @ 2005 The SteLuTec Foundation, All rights reserved,
http://s93396271,onlinehome.us/ 7/2912005
stelutec.org Page 3 of5
GRAND PRIZE.
One (1) Grand Prize will be awarded consisting of a newly remodeled house;
complete with new walls, floors, electrical, plumbing, appliances, windows,
siding, and roof. Artists are working to complete the finished drawing of the
house which will be posted on this website. Carpenters are working to finish
building the house. Floor plans for the house will be posted on this website as
soon as they become available.
he house is described as a two story, three bedroom, two and one half
bathrooms, fenced yard, two car garage, open porch, formal dining room, formal
living room, family room, kitchen and half bath on the main floor.
pstairs is described as Master Bedroom with Master bathroom, including a door to
an open porch and staircase to the backyard, laundry room, two smaller bedrooms,
and a full bath.
ore information about the house will be made available as it becomes available.
SECOND PRIZE:
Second Prize will be made known as soon as a sponsor commits to a non-cash
prize. (We are negotiating for a car.)
HIRD PRIZE:
hird Prize will be made known as soon as a sponsor commits to a non-cash
prize. (We are negotiating for big screen TV's.)
dditional prizes may be added during the course of the contest based on
corporate sponsorship and contest interest.
I~.l
. BUY NOW ..
Click here to use your credit card and securely order your entry forms.
3. ELIGIBILITY:
OU MUST BE A L~GAL U.S. RESIDENT RESIDING IN THE FIFTY UNITED STATES
OR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THROUGHOUT THE CONTEST PERIOD to be eligible
to win. Potential winners will be required to provide proof of legal U.S. residency
to The SteLuTec Foundation to determine eligibility and as a condition of prize
award. Employees of The SteLuTec Foundation, Friendly 'Puters, LLC, their
respective parents, subsidiaries, divisions, affiliates, suppliers, printers,
distributors and advertising, promotional and judging agencies (collectively
"Sponsor and its Administrators"), are not eligible to win. Limit one prize per
name and/or address and/or household.
Click here to use your credit card and securely order your
entry forms.
. WINNER SELECTION AND NOTIFICATION:
Potential winners will be selected from among all eligible entries received. Odds
of winning depend on the number of eligible entries received. Potential winners
will be notified by email via the email address provided at the time of
http://s93396271.onlinehome.us/Rules%200fl,lo20golf.html 8/1/2005
-' !
'<!t', t
.. ,
~.~ ... ,,' ;
,......" '
,.,JIf-J
f,"' Ii
r l. "
.~. f~i'
, .
.. ' 4;1
~!'
"
I
.:
:\
, .,,---.
~
tl~"" ~~" i - - ,,;)i'
. ~,.-.,.. f.
~~ .r ." t dJ
, l~
-.;;" '; _ ~ r. I
~_, r W
"'I
""'r
.e '4 \,
I L'"
<!1'., I
';., ~ i' I
........,'" 4 ....~ ,
,-.>;H;._ . I
,-
,.~t '.
~tl;;lUtl;;".Ul 0 '-'
( BuyNow ]
( Make a Donation )
The SteLuTec Foundation
Click the "Buy Now" button to purchase your raffle tickets on
line (a 75 centfee applies)
Click the "M ake a Donation" button to malee a donatio II wiIlIolII
purchasing a raffle ticket.
WE'RE GIVING Awa}'
a (newl_1996 Harley-_Davidson
Road king xlt
Or $15,000.00 CASH, winner's choice
September 15, 2005
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: John Grossman, HRA Director
RE: Access agreement between HRA and Sherman Assoc.
The HRA will consider an access agreement at the request of Sherman Assoc. to permit
them to demolish the former local oil buildings on block one at their expense.
The agreement will cover the financial and liability issues related to working on HRA
property. Funds will be escrowed with the HRA to cover the cost ofthe work.
There are several reasons for the request: demonstrating to prospective buyers that work
is starting on the condominiums; opening the views to the river; getting a head start on
clearing and grading the site preparatory to construction.
Provided the HRA approves, work could begin the week of September 26.
M.H ----
~ ~~..... o~~~'"
#' 'll~ ~\\.;\-\l
\lo~~ ~~
N
0 ~."
'\
\ SITE PLAN s
CONAGRA - HASTINGS, MN
SCALE: 1"=50'
~
[ ] "'"
PLAN OF DRAINAGE CONDITIONS 21 Au 05
Sacc Group Inc. PLOT
ConAgra - Hastings Facility PROJECT No.
NO. REVISIONS BY O"TE OWG..., D-1 REV. 0