Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutII. b. 05-03-11 HEDRA Special Meeting MinutesHastings Economic Development and Redevelopment Authority 7:30 am Hastings City Hall SPECIAL MEETING Minutes of May 3, 2011 HEDRA Commissioners Dennis Peine, Ron Toppin, Danna Elling Schultz, Michael Kelley, Kurt Keena, and Tony Alongi present HEDRA Commissioners Pam Holzem absent Staff present: Community Relation Specialist Shannon Rausch. Guests Present: Greg Stotko and Jeff Carlson Q: UORUM A quorum was established and the special meeting was called to order, by Chair Toppin at 7:35am with 6 members present. I.B USINESS A.Block 29 Concept Plan Greg Stotko and Carlson Capital Management met with HEDRA to provide more detailed information about the proposed construction of a new office building located south of City Hall on Lots 1 and 3, Block 29. As discussed at the regular April 21, 2011 HEDRA meeting, this new development would be a single story building with 3,770 s.f. of office space and would include around 14-18 parking spaces. Mr. Stotko discussed the various minor changes they have made to the plans since it was first presented to HEDRA two weeks ago. These changes were made in an effort to better protect and preserve the mature trees currently on the property that HEDRA has required any development to leave untouched. Other modifications have been made to the originally presented plans for parking, but still the number of stalls will exceed the requirements. The meeting was then opened to questions from the Commissioners. Commissioners asked for better clarification as to why the originally agreed upon development of a two story, 6,500 s.f. office building is no longer being considered and why this new, single story, 3,700 s.f. building should be accepted. Reasons given included that fact that the market isn’t today what it was a few years ago. Also that this project would be a step up from what was offered in the Development Agreement, (this project would include a lot of brick and stone in the façade which was not in the original project.) It would be owned solely by one company which anticipates growth in its company’s future, rather than having rental space which can end up sitting vacant for long periods. This business fits the location in not 1 Minutes – Hastings EDRA – 04/21/11 Page needing great visibility as it is a destination type business. It would move 5-6 new jobs to Hastings which currently are not in town, as well as bringing 4-6 high-end clients to town daily (who would not otherwise be likely to come to town.) All this, plus the added fact that the client would like to work with as many local contactors and tradesmen as possibly to build this project in their opinion justify the smaller scaled building for the same priced land. Discussion was had on the large amount of office/commercial space currently available throughout Hastings and why it wouldn’t be better to fill one of those vacancies rather than building yet another office building. The Client has rented/leased his past six locations and is tired of not being in control. He would like to own his own building and by building, rather than remodeling he can get exactly what he wants without settling or spending as much. Conversation were also had regarding the fact that HEDRA needs to justify selling the land to the developer for $1, rather than a price more in line with the market value, which was last assessed at $140,000. When compared to the Industrial Park projects where land is sold per acre, with requirements of staying in business for 5 years and bringing a certain number of jobs at a certain pay rate and HEDRA typically invests about 5-7% into these projects. This project HEDRA would be a much bigger investment for HEDRA with the total investing somewhere between 15 – 19%. How does HEDRA justify this when future project come forward asking for assistance? Discussions continued, and it was pointed out that HRA acquired this property to get rid of blight, control the site and keep the trees. HEDRA entered into the Development Agreement with Stotko Speedling in 2009 to help HEDRA find someone who would work within the commissions parameters. HEDRA put tougher restrictions on this property than typically seen in the Industrial Park where HEDRA sells then empty land with no restrictions. The commissioners agreed that with this project HEDRA would be getting high paying professional jobs in town, not just your average $12 - $18/hr positions. The developer and his client are working within the parameters and keeping the trees, which is not and easy task. And the proposed building is higher quality than what was initially proposed in the Development Agreement, even if it’s smaller. Commissioners also agreed that they currently own a lot of property, it’s time to start developing some of it. If HEDRA denies this project which has many positives (listed above) what exactly is it that the Commission is holding out for? After further discussions Commissioner Keena motioned to approve the concept plan and grant staff the authority to prepare the purchase agreement, motion was seconded by Commissioner Kelley. Motion passed 6 - 0 A: DJOURNMENT Commissioner Keena moved to adjourn at 8:35 am, Commissioner Keena seconded. Motion Passed 6-0 Next meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 12, 2011 at 6:00pm in the Council Chambers. Shannon M. Rausch 2 Minutes – Hastings EDRA – 04/21/11 Page