HomeMy WebLinkAbout4 - Street Project
Memo
To: Planning Commission
From: Justin Fortney, Associate Planner
Date: February 25, 2008
SubjectCity of Hastings
: – Original Hastings Design Guidelines Review
#2008-05 – North Vermillion Area Improvements
REQUEST
The Planning Commission is asked to review and comment on the following actions:
North Vermillion Area Improvement Plan
1). The City of Hastings is preparing to
th
reconstruct most streets and utilities from Spring St. east to Tyler St. and 6 St.
th
south to 10 St as part of the North Vermillion Area Improvements Plan. The
area falls within the study area of the Original Hastings Design Guidelines study
area as established under the 2003 Heart of Hastings Plan.
St John’s Church Parking Request.
2)St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church
has requested that as part of the street reconstruction project the City provide
th
angled parking adjacent to their property on the north side of 8 St W and both
sides of Eddy St. The proposal will provide 10 to 11 additional parking spaces
more than the current parallel spaces. This proposal will require the removal of
8 mature boulevard trees and require Eddy St to be widened from 32 feet wide
to 66 feet wide.
ORIGINAL HASTINGS DESIGN GUIDELINES
Original Hastings Design Guidelines were adopted by the City Council in 2003 as part of
the Heart of Hastings Master Plan. The Design Guidelines list four functions that the
plan should be used for. One of which is to:
Guide the design of public improvements (streetscape, public buildings, etc.)
within Original Hastings.
Design Guidelines establish different criteria for street and streetscape improvements
based upon the land use and character. Streets within the improvement area are
termed “neighborhood” streets and described as follows:
NORTH VERMILLION AREA IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
The Engineering Department is currently developing plans for street and utility reconstruction for
the North Vermillion Area Improvements project. Streets proposed for reconstruction include
thththth
6, 7, 8 & 9 Streets between Vermillion Street and Spring Street, Eddy Street from halfway
thththththth
between 5 and 6 Streets to 10 Street, Spring Street between 6 and 10 Streets, on 7 and
ththth
8 Streets between Vermillion Street and Bailly Street, and on Sibley Street between 6 and 8
Streets. The proposed improvement area consists of 26 ½ blocks of street and utility
reconstruction, along with the reconstruction of three alleys.
About half of the street segments in the proposed project area are within the Neighborhood
Conservation District as defined by the Design Guidelines for Original Hastings portion of the
Heart of Hastings Plan that was adopted by the City in 2003. The remaining streets are within
the Historic District, for which the Hastings Preservation Commission has reviewed and
provided comments. The Engineering Department has worked to accommodate most of the
design guidelines for neighborhood streets, which include:
32 foot street width to accommodate parallel parking
Boulevard tree placement and preservation
4 foot minimum width sidewalks
4 foot minimum width boulevards
Ornamental street lighting fixtures
Please see attached memorandum from City Engineer Nick Egger for more detailed
information about proposed street improvements.
ANALYSIS
The City has carefully planned improvements to be consistent with the Original Hastings
Design Guidelines. Staff finds the North Vermillion Area Improvements to be consistent
with the Original Hastings Design Guidelines.
ST JOHNS CHURCH REQUEST
th
St Johns Evangelical Lutheran Church located at 208 West 8 Street seeks to amend
th
the North Vermillion Improvement Plan to allow for on street diagonal parking on 8
Street W and Eddy Street.
HISTORY
In 1988 the HPC recommended that the church consider curb cuts to increase the on
street parking rather than relocating a historic house to build a parking lot. The church
had the Engineering Department develop a parking diagram to determine if it was
feasible to do so. At this time the church did not want to bear the expense of the curb
cut parking and the City would not because the streets were not scheduled for
replacement. Now the City is replacing the streets and the request has come-up.
Please see memo from City Engineer Nick Egger for further information.
RECOMENDATION
Staff does not support St John’s parking request finding it inconsistent with the Original
Hastings Design Guidelines as follows:
th
Street width along Eddy St and 8 Street would be extended beyond the 32
1)
foot limit.
Along Eddy Street the width would be nearly 66 feet, more than
double the 32 foot width limit.
Removal of existing mature boulevard trees.
2) All of the mature boulevard
trees along Eddy Street would be removed which would significantly alter the
character of the roadway.
Removal of landscaped boulevard.
3) The landscaped boulevard between the
sidewalk and Eddy Street would be removed; the widened street would be
located directly behind the existing sidewalk with no transition or buffering.
Limited increase of parking.
4) Conversion of existing parallel parking spaces to
diagonal parking would achieve a net increase of only 10-11 parking spaces.
Limited use of parking.
5) Parking spaces would remain vacant at most times.
Parking use would likely be limited to Sunday mornings and Wednesday
evenings.
ATTACHMENTS
Map of street and utility replacement
Design Guideline street type map
1988 parking analysis study
Site photos
Memo – Nick Egger - North Vermillion Area Improvements
Memo – Nick Egger - St John’s Church parking request
Above is the project area by jurisdiction
Original Hasting Design Guideline street type map
1988 Parking analysis study
Eddy looking north
HPC to make a
recommendation on this
portion
Church
th
8 St W
Looking East
Spring Street
MEMO
To:Hastings Planning Commission
From:
Nick Egger – City Engineer
Date:February 22, 2008
Re:
North Vermillion Area Improvements (NVAI)
The Engineering Department is currently developing plans for street and utility reconstruction
for the North Vermillion Area Improvements project. Streets proposed for reconstruction
thththth
include 6, 7, 8 & 9 Streets between Vermillion Street and Spring Street, Eddy Street from
ththththth
halfway between 5 and 6 Streets to 10 Street, Spring Street between 6 and 10 Streets, on
ththth
7 and 8 Streets between Vermillion Street and Bailly Street, and on Sibley Street between 6
th
and 8 Streets. The proposed improvement area consists of 26 ½ blocks of street and utility
reconstruction, along with the reconstruction of three alleys.
About half of the street segments in the proposed project area are within the Neighborhood
Conservation District as defined by the Design Guidelines for Original Hastings portion of the
Heart of Hastings Plan that was adopted by the City in 2003. The remaining streets are within
the Historic District, for which the Hastings Preservation Commission has reviewed and
provided comments. The Engineering Department has worked accommodate most of the design
guidelines for neighborhood streets, which include:
32 foot street width to accommodate parallel parking
Boulevard tree placement and preservation
4 foot minimum width sidewalks
4 foot minimum width boulevards
Ornamental street lighting fixtures
The following sections summarize the design features that are currently incorporated into the
plans for this project and how they apply to the criteria listed above.
S&BW
TREETOULEVARDIDTHS
Wherever possible, streets that are currently less than 32 feet wide have been designed to be
reconstructed to a 32 foot width. This configuration is ideal in accommodating parallel parking
with two-way traffic, and preserves adequate space for the maintenance of emergency access. In
some cases, topography and the presence of boulevard trees or other obstructions in close
proximity to the existing street edges prohibits street widening. When these conditions are
present, streets have been designed to achieve the maximum width possible.
S
IDEWALKS
Existing sidewalks in the District would be replaced in as close to their current locations as
possible to the City standard of five feet in width, with some areas remaining if they are found to
be in good condition. There are several areas in which physical constraints, such as slopes and
trees, prohibit widening of sidewalk segments. Although the City adopted standard sidewalk
width is five feet, these situations will require compromise to maintain the continuity of sidewalk
corridor.
There are also several areas in which at least a portion of the existing sidewalk is located on
private property. City staff will be approaching the affected property owners to discuss these
situations and to pursue easements in order for these sidewalks to be replaced.
BT
OULEVARDREES
The project area contains many mature boulevard trees. Accordingly, staff has made diligent
efforts during the design process to preserve existing trees to the maximum extent possible while
still maintaining the infrastructure improvement goals of the project. Engineering Department
staff worked closely with the City Forester and Parks Superintendent to determine conditions of
existing trees, and whether project design features have potential in harming existing trees. Staff
is also determining tree species that will be planted in boulevard areas in need of populating and
in cases where trees must be removed due to poor health or where removal is unavoidable. A list
of 10 trees recommended for removal has been developed by City Forester Paul Mahoney and
Parks Superintendent Kevin Smith. Eight of the trees listed are considered risk trees due to poor
health, decay, or concerns about long term stability such that these trees pose a threat to public
safety in the event that they would fall. Two other trees obstruct sight lines at intersections and
also present a concern to public safety. Staff will take a further look at these trees to see if
measures such as trimming for sight clearance may be possible.
OL
RNAMENTALIGHTING
The Neighborhood Street Design Guidelines of the Original Hastings Design Standards indicate
that ornamental lighting fixtures be implemented as part of the streetscape, at a concentration of
four per block. With block lengths within this project area consistently between 250 and 300
feet, this would result in light pole spacing of approximately 100 feet assuming lights at each
corner. It is staff’s opinion that this will produce lighting concentration far in excess of what is
reasonably necessary and tolerable for street lighting in a tight neighborhood setting. Staff’s
recommendation is that a light at each intersection, and one mid block will suffice. An example
ndth
of this spacing interval can be found along Eddy Street between 2 and 5 Streets. It is also
important to point out that such lighting has not been incorporated into recent projects other than
the aforementioned section of Eddy Street.
In addition, a system of lighting meeting the design guidelines would require the installation of
approximately 75 new ornamental poles and carry an exorbitant price on the order of $500,000
or more, not including continual operation and maintenance costs. This is well beyond the
City’s budget for project costs this year, and therefore this feature has not been included in the
plans. Instead, City staff is seeking feedback from the HPC, Planning Commission, and Council
Operations committee to ascertain their desires regarding this item. If ornamental street lighting
were desired, staff would recommend that there be an annual street lighting project on a much
smaller scale, until the areas within these districts met the guidelines for street lighting.
ODF
THERESIGNEATURES
Some sections of retaining walls will be necessary to support slopes within boulevards in a few
areas. In these cases, modern modular block retaining wall materials will be used for
construction. The block material design specified for this project will match what was
previously approved by the HPC for use in conjunction with the Vermillion Historic Wall
project. It is anticipated that walls constructed in this project area will be a maximum of 3 feet
high, thereby not requiring any sort of protective fencing or railings above them. If fencing were
to be necessary, it would be of a compatible design and materials. Photos of these materials will
be available at the Planning Commission meeting.
C
ONCLUSION
In summary, staff has taken care in laying out the configuration of the proposed improvement
area with consideration for the design standards of the Conservation District. This has resulted
in plans that will allow the character and features of the neighborhood streetscape to remain
while carrying on the goals of the City for improvement of the public infrastructure.
The Department appreciates the opportunity to present this information to the Commission and
the Commission’s feedback. Recommendations that the Commission may have will be
combined with comments from affected property owners received by staff at the neighborhood
meetings and forwarded to the City Council for their consideration at the upcoming Public
rd
Hearing for this project on March 3.
MEMO
To:Hastings Planning Commission
From:
Nick Egger – City Engineer
Date:February 22, 2008
Re:
St. John’s Lutheran Church Parking Request
City staff met with representatives of St. John’s Lutheran Church several weeks ago to discuss
their request to incorporate angle parking into Eddy Street as part of the North Vermillion Area
Improvements project. The italicized information below was sent by Public Works Director
Tom Montgomery to the City Council shortly after to summarize the request and staff’s
recommendations regarding the matter.
Mayor and City Councilmembers,
th
As part of the proposed 2008 Street and Utility Reconstruction Program, both 8 Street
and Eddy Street would be reconstructed, affecting St. John’s Church located at the NW corner of
th
8 and Eddy along with the church offices located across Eddy Street from the church, behind
the historic Smith-Atwood house. The draft plans call for reconstructing the project streets at
the existing 32 ft. width and preserve the existing angled parking in front of St. John’s Church on
th
8 Street.
St. John’s Church has requested that the City construct angled parking in front of their
property on both sides of Eddy Street and extend the existing angled parking on the north side of
th
8 Street west to their west property line (see enclosed drawings and pictures). The proposed
additional angled parking would generate a net 11 or 12 parking spaces. City staff met with
representatives from the church and explained that staff would not be recommending
construction of the additional angled parking for the following reasons:
The properties are within the Conservation District or the Old Hastings Historic District.
Neighborhood Design Guidelines note that the character of existing neighborhood streets
should be maintained, with 32 ft. wide streets, sidewalks and boulevard trees. The
addition of angled parking would effectively pave the entire 66 ft. wide right of way on
Eddy Street south of the alley, converting the street into a parking lot. The angled
parking would not fit in with the existing character of Eddy Street and would not meet the
Conservation District’s design guidelines.
Six mature trees would be removed from the boulevard on Eddy Street; two trees would
th
be removed from the north side of 8 Street.
Snow removal would become an issue as the entire Eddy Street right of way is parking or
sidewalk, leaving no place to push snow.
Background
In 1988, St. John’s Lutheran Church purchased the historic Smith-Atwood house, whose
property extended back to Eddy Street. St. John’s Church initially proposed moving the house
and utilizing the property for their office and church parking. The Historic Preservation
Commission opposed moving the historic home. The HPC and St. John’s Church reached a
compromise under which the property would be subdivided, separating the Sibley St. frontage
from the rest of the historic property. Under this proposal, the existing carriage house was
converted to an office with a smaller parking lot and variances were recommended to allow
fewer parking stalls than ordinances required. As part of the analyzing overall parking needs,
the Engineering Department prepared the enclosed drawing illustrating the maximum number of
parking stalls that could be created on street to address the additional parking needs generated
by the office conversion and planned addition to the church. I have also enclosed 1988
correspondence and Planning Commission minutes on this issue for your information.
The St. John’s Church representatives asked how they could further pursue their angled
parking request. I asked them to send me a letter explaining their request, noting that I would
thth
forward it to the Council along with other comments staff receives from the February 5 and 6
neighborhood meetings. I also mentioned that they have the opportunity to address the Council
directly on this issue at the public hearing on the proposed 2008 North Vermillion Area Street
Reconstruction Project, which will be held in March.
Additional information included with this memo:
Planning Commission and City Council minutes from meetings in 1988 in which parking
variances were approved in order to accommodate the Church’s acquisition and change
in use for the carriage house on the Howes-Graus property.
A letter from St. John’s Lutheran Church explaining their position on this matter.
Representatives of the Church are also planning to attend the meeting and speak on this issue.