The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-16-03 CITY OF HASTINGS 7:00 P.M. Monday June 16, 2003 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. VIII. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: DETERMINATION OF QUORUM: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Approval of Minutes for the Regular Meeting on June 2, 2003 COUNCIL ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED: CONSENT AGENDA: The items on the Consent Agenda are to be acted upon by the City Council in a single motion. There will be no discussion of these items unless a Councilmember or citizen so requests, in which event the items will be removed from the Consent Agenda to the appropriate department for discussion. 1 . Pay Bills As Audited 2. Resolution-Exempt Gambling Permit: Hastings Family Service on September 20, 2003 Approve Renewal of Elevator Maintenance Contract Authorize Advertisement for Bid-2003 Sealcoat Program Authorize Assessment of Sewer Repair-203 15th Street West Pay Estimate #5-2002 General Sieben Drive Reconstruction: McNamara Construction ($468,711.88) Pay Estimate #2-2003 General Sieben Drive Extension: A-1 Excavating ($499,459.40) Pay Estimate #8-2002 Improvement Program: Three Rivers Construction ($93,698.83) Pay Estimate #4 Louis Lane Ponding Basin: Pember Construction ($3,567.75) 2003 Budget Adjustments Main Street Festival Road Closing Authorize Advertisement for Wallin Park Hockey Rink Approve 2003/2004 Liquor License Renewals Resolution-Approving On-Sale Liquor License-The Red Feather Restaurant 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. AWARDING OF CONTRACTS & PUBLIC HEARING: 1. Award Contract-Highway 61 and 10th Street Intersection Improvements REPORTS FROM CITY STAFF: A. Public Works - r IX. X. XI. XII. XIII. 8. Planning 1. Resolution-Site Plan #2003-28: 30-Unit Condo Building: 875 Bahls Drive (Lawrence Builders) Resolution-Variance #2003-40: 1009 East 3rd Street (Haas) Resolution: Variance #2003-43 - 502 West ih Street (Mancino) First Reading-City Code Amendment #2003-38: Downtown Master Plan Zoning Authorization for Request for Proposals-Riverfront Redevelopment 2. 3. 4. 5. C. Administration 1 . Approve Plans & Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids-City Hall Roof Repair 2. Annual License Renewal-Old Mill Pawn Shop License COMMENTS FROM AUDIENCE: UNFINISHED BUSINESS: NEW BUSINESS: REPORTS FROM CITY COMMITTEES, OFFICERS, COUNCILMEMBERS: ADJOURNMENT: Next Regular City Council Meeting on Monday, July 7, 2003 - T City Council Minutes Hastings, Minnesota June 2, 2003 The City Council of the City of Hastings, Minnesota met in a regular meetin~ on Monday, June 2, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers, 101 4 Street East, Hastings, Minnesota. Members Present: Councilmembers Hazlet, Moratzka, Riveness, Schultz, and Yandrasits Mayor Werner Members Absent: Councilmember Hicks Staff Members Present: David Osberg, City Administrator; Shawn Moynihan, City Attorney; Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk; John Hinzman, Planning Director; Marty McNamara, Parks & Recreation Director Lori Webster, Finance Director; Approval of Minutes Mayor Werner asked if there were any corrections or additions to the minutes of the regular meeting of May 19, 2003 or the special meeting of May 27, 2003. There was a minor change to the May 19 minutes; the minutes were approved with that change. Proclamation-June 15, 2003 as Gordy Grossman Day Mayor Werner read the proclamation honoring Mr. Grossman Consent Agenda Moved by Councilmember Yandrasits, seconded by Councilmember Riveness, to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. 6 Ayes; Nays, None. 1. First Pay All Bills As Audited 2. Schedule Public Hearing for July 7, 2003 on proposed Liquor License fee increase 3. Schedule Special city Council Meeting for 5:30 PM on Monday June 23, 2003 4. Order Public Hearing for July 7, 2003 for Consideration of Historic Preservation Site 5. MLBA Children's Fund Lawful Gambling Permit at River's Bar and Grill 6.- 2003 Budget Adjustments 7. SA Fireworks License 8. Eagles Club Fundraiser 9. Request to Serve 3.2 Beer and have Charitable Gambling during 63rd Annual Booya 10. Order Traffic Study Whispering Crest Villas Copy of resolutions on file. -- r Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 2, 2003 Page 2 of 3 Public Hearing-Excess Property at Highway 316 in Marshan Township Mayor Werner opened the public hearing at 7:02 p.m. Hearing no comments, the public hearing was closed at 7:02 p.m. Second Reading-Excess Property at Highway 316 in Marshan Township Moved by Councilmember Moratzka, seconded by Councilmember Yandrasits to approve the action as presented. 6 Ayes; Nays, none. Presentation-Mississippi River Clean-Up . Anne Hunt provided some information to the Council about the 2003 Mississippi River Clean-Up, which will have its kick-off on June 14,2003 at Jaycee Park. Volunteers are encouraged to call 651-739-1127 or go to www.rivercleanup.orq. Resolution-Minor Subdivision: 300 West 33rd Street (D&L Inns of Hastings) Planning Director Hinzman provided background information on this request, including the Planning Commission's recommendation that the request be denied as the parcel to be created would be largely unbuildable. Leon Fisher, the property qwner, provided some background on the issue and the reason for the request. City Attorney Moynihan stated that the legal aspects of this property may not be resolved until the end of 2003 and that there remain concerns with fire separation on the encroachment wall. Moved by Councilmember Moratzka, seconded by Councilmember Hazlet to deny the request for a minor subdivision with the findings of fact as approved by the Planning Commission. 6 Ayes; Nays, none. First Reading and Order Public Hearing-Ordinance Amendments to Chapters 10.23-10.24, Relating to Industrial Park Uses Moved by Councilmember Hazlet, seconded by Councilmember Riveness to table this issue to the Planning Committee of the Council for further discussion. 6 Ayes; Nays, none. Glendale Heights Traffic Evaluation Moved by Councilmember Yandrasits, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to proceed with the project as planned. 6 Ayes; Nays, none. Presentation of 2002 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and Audit Report Report accepted by the City Council. - r Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 2, 2003 Page 3 of 3 Roadside Park Tennis Courts-Rename to Bud Zeien Memorial Tennis Courts There were several actions to consider: Renaming the courts after Bud Zeien; If approved, The signage for the renamed courts will be funded privateli; Ordinance amendment limiting the court use to tennis only. Moved by Councilmember Schultz, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to rename the courts as presented, for staff to pursue private funding sources for installation of a new sign, and for discussion of the future of the courts, as well as its uses, to be referred to the Parks & Recreation Committee of the Council 6 Ayes; Nays, none. Annual License Renewal for Pawn Shop City Administrator Osberg stated that the applicant still has not paid $613 in APS fees. All other renewal paperwork and fees have been submitted. Moved by Council member Yandrasits, seconded by Councilmember Hazlet to deny the license renewal until all fees have been paid. 6 Ayes; Nays, None. Authorize Extension of Leave Balance for IT Director Moved by Councilmember Schultz, seconded by Councilmember Riveness, to approve the extension request as presented. 6 Ayes; Nays, None. 2003 Police Officers Union Contract Moved by Councilmember Hazlet, seconded by Councilmember Yandrasits to approve the 2003 contract as presented. 6 Ayes; Nays, None. Adjournment Moved by Councilmember Riveness, seconded by Councilmember Moratzka to adjourn the meeting at 7:58 p.m. 6 Ayes; Nays, None. Mayo r ATTEST City Clerk ,,- T' Date: 06/12/2003 Department Time: 08:58:42 BECKY KLINE Page: 1 Operator: CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description Amount -------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------ 100.00 100.00* ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CITY CLERK FINANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE M.I.S. POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE REGINA MEDICAL CENTE JUNE WELLNESS Total for Department 000 AT&T LONG DISTANCE CHARGES MN CITY/CTNY MANGEMN MCMA MEMBERSHIP NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONE SERVICE UNITED STATES POSTAL POSTAGE Total for Department 105 MN CI TY / CTNY MANGEMN MCMA DUES Total for Department 107 HASTINGS AREA CHAMBE MAY LODGING TAX Total for Department 120 LIFEWORKS SERVICES I MAY SERVICE REIS,INC NIPPLE/BUSHING R & 0 ELEVATOR CO. I MAY SERVICE SKC COMMUNICATIONS BATTERY PACK STATE SUPPLY CO WATTS REPAIR KIT Total for Department 140 VECTOR INTERNET SERV WEB HOSTING Total for Department 160 AT&T LONG DISTANCE CHARGES BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES BATTERY CABLE/TOWING BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES CK BRAKES BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES OIL CHANGE BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES OIL CHANGE/LUBE/TIRES BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES OIL CHANGE/TUNE UP/WIPER BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES REPLACE STARTER BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES REPLACE TIE ROD END BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES TIRES BIRCHEN ENTERPRISES VALVE CORES/TIRES BOUND TREE/NORTH AME MEDICAL SUPPLY ITEMS COFER, MARY UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMERGENCY VEHICLE SU REPAIR RADAR EQUIPMENT GRAPHIC DESIGN BUSINESS CARDS - NOWLAN JACK I S UNIFORM EQUI BADGES - RESERVE UNIT MN DEPT OF ADMINISTR MONTHLY USAGE - STATE LI ARCH WIRELESS MONTHLY PAGER LEASE PETERSEN, ROXANN BOOK REIMBURSEMENT PETERSEN, ROXANN REIMBURSE APPAREL Total for Department 201 BUILDING AND INSPECT TOENJES, JANE MILEAGE Total for Department 230 PUBLIC WORKS ANDERSEN, E.F. & ASS SIGNS PUBLI C WORKS AT&T LONG DISTANCE CHARGES -129.36 98.90 35.84 2,009.50 2,014.88* 80.00 80.00* 4,494.84 4,494.84* 250.44 5.62 165.37 55.92 97.72 575.07* 34.95 34.95* 144.15 97.50 27.00 41. 24 154.06 76.04 267.19 86.06 386.99 253.26 38.05 157.75 239.30 143.78 591. 45 37.00 472.84 18.03 37.06 3,268.75* 16.56 16.56* 131. 37 7.62 VI-1 r Date: 06/12/2003 Department Time: 08:58:43 Operator: BECKY KLINE Page: 2 CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description -------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------ Amount PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS BDM CONSULTING ENGIN 18TH &: EDDY LOT REGRADE BDM CONSULTING ENGIN CENTERPOINT ENERGY BDM CONSULTING ENGIN COMCAST BDM CONSULTING ENGIN DAKOTA ELECTRIC BDM CONSULTING ENGIN GENERAL CITY CONSULTING BDM CONSULTING ENGIN SPRINT BDM CONSULTING ENGIN XCEL ENERGY BOYER FORD TRUCKS CLAMPS/FREIGHT COUNTRYSIDE IMPLEMEN STARTER REPAIR FARMERS UNION CO-OP OIL FIELDWORKS RGR DOWNLOAD BDL GOODIN CO. FITTINGS GORDY'S GLASS LABOR/GLASS HASTINGS TIRE & AUTO LABOR/NEW VALVE STEM/MOU MIDTOWN FOOD CENTER VINEGAR/DISTILLED WATER MOSENG, PATRICK DAVI KEYS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE BITS/LAMP MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CLEARANCE MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CLEVIS/PIN/FITTINGS/FUSE MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CORD MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CORE CREDITS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FILTERS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FITTING/CARTRIDGE MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FITTINGS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FLOW SEAl MOTOR PARTS SERVICE HOSE MOTOR PARTS SERVICE SEALS/SPECTRA/SHOE/DRUMS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE SUPERSTAT/CAP/ROTOR/PLUG MOTOR PARTS SERVICE V-BELT SCHUTT, MARK FUEL TOENJES, JUSTIN SAFETY BOOTS TWIN CITY STRIPING STRIPING Total for Department 300 PARKS AND RECREATION FIRST NAT'L BANK JULY LOAN 0320243279 Total for Department 401 MISCELLANEOUS MISCELLANEOUS LEAGUE MN CITIES INS 3RD INSTALLMENT CMC 2316 MAGUIRE AGENCY AGENT FEES/3RD QTR Total for Department 600 Total for Fund 101 PARKS AND RECREATION AT&T PARKS AND RECREATION MOTOR PARTS SERVICE PARKS AND RECREATION NORTHWEST LANDSCAPE PARKS AND RECREATION RENT 'N' SAVE PORTAE LONG DISTANCE CHARGES LIGHT BULBS IRRIGATION/PARTS/SERVICE TOILET RENT LINE MARKER - HYAA PARKS AND RECREATION TESSMAN SEED INC Total for Department 401 259.00 333.00 37.00 37.00 148.00 185.00 111. 00 35.06 66.00 174.81 40.96 549.87 246.06 125.98 8.41 6.39 9.05 8.12 56.27 2.23 -24.80 83.40 13.71 4.39 8.49 1. 03 164.59 80.94 14.16 5.00 34.97 - 4,648.93 7,613.01* 1,527.35 1,527.35* 53,557.50 3,200.00 56,757.50* 76,482.91* 6.50 33.79 465.00 225.78 214.11 945.18* T- Date: 06/12/2003 Time: 08:58:43 Operator: BECKY KLINE CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Department Vendor Name Description -------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------ 945.18* Total for Fund 200 CARBOY CREDIT POOL CHEMICALS CONCESION SUPPLIES CONCESSION SUPPLIES CANDY for Department 401 PARKS AND RECREATION AQUA LOGIC, INC. PARKS AND RECREATION AQUA LOGIC, INC. PARKS AND RECREATION FIRST LINE BEVERAGES PARKS AND RECREATION FIRST LINE BEVERAGES PARKS AND RECREATION FRITZ CO. INC. Total Total for Fund 201 CABLE HASTINGS ACCESS CORP ACCESS SUPPORT Total for Department 420 Total for Fund 206 HERITAGE PRESERVATIO MN HISTORICAL SOCIET MEMBERSHIP Total for Department 170 Total for Fund 210 REGINA MEDICAL CENTE JUNE WELLNESS Total for Department 000 FIRE AT&T LONG DISTANCE CHARGES Total for Department 210 Total for Fund 213 PARKS AND RECREATION RILEY, DETTMANN & KE EVAL ASST PARK/REC POSIT Total for Department 401 Total for Fund 401 HOUSING AND REDEVELO BRADLEY & DEIKE PA BAILLY'S LANDING HOUSING AND REDEVELO BRADLEY & DEIKE PA JUNG LOAN HOUSING AND REDEVELO DAKOTA COUNTY CDA MISSISSIPPI TERRACE ANNU Total for Department 500 Total for Fund 402 EQUIPMENT REVOLVING INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTO OS & MEMORY UPGRADES/BLD EQUIPMENT REVOLVING NELSON DODGE-GMC INC PICK UP TRUCK Total for Department 800 Total for Fund 403 HOUSING AND REDEVELO BRADLEY & DEIKE PA HOUSING AND REDEVELO BRADLEY & DEIKE PA HOUSING AND REDEVELO BRADLEY & DEIKE PA BURR LOAN GENERAL MATTERS MULLER LOAN Page: 3 Amount -90.00 1,914.34 1,563.28 1,002.71 1.008.00 5,398.33* 5,398.33* 25,000.00 25,000.00* 25,000.00* 20.00 20.00* 20.00* 270.00 270.00* 29.46 29.46* 299.46* 225.00 225.00* 225.00* 87.50 125.00 15,000.00 15,212.50* 15,212.50* 478.31 18,296.00 18,774.31* 18,774.31* 37.50 25.00 125.00 T Date: 06/12/2003 Department Time: 08:58:43 Operator: BECKY KLINE Page: 4 CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description -------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------ Amount HOUSING AND REDEVELO BRADLEY & DEIKE PA SHERMAN HOUSING HOUSING AND REDEVELO HOISINGTON KOEGLER G MASTER PLAN DRAFT PRINTI Total for Department 500 Total for Fund 404 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JOHNSTON CULVERT CO. INDUSTRIAL PARK CULVERTS Total for Department 180 PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLI C WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLI C WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLI C WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLI C WORKS PUBLI C WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS Total for Fund 407 BDM CONSULTING ENGIN 2002-9 MCNAMARA CONTRACTING GS DR EXT PAY PEMBER EXCAVATING IN PAY EST #4 THREE RIVERS CONSTRU WESTWOOD Total for Department 300 EST #5 Total for Fund 492 A-1 EXCAVATING GS DR EXT/BRIDGE PAY EST ARCHEOLOGICAL RESEAR PH 1 SURVEY/GS DR PROJEC BDM CONSULTING ENGIN 2003-6 GS DR AND BRIDGE BDM CONSULTING ENGIN 2003-6 GS DR LAND SURVEY BDM CONSULTING ENGIN RlVERWOOD SOUTH OAKS DES LHB ENGINEERS & ARCH CONSTRUCTION ASSISTANCE/ Total for Department 300 Total for Fund 493 APWA MEMBERSHIP SAN DIEGO CONF - HEUSSER AT&T LONG DISTANCE CHARGES BARR ENGINEERING CO. WELLHEAD PROTECTION DELI BUMPER TO BUMPER BELT BUMPER TO BUMPER CHARGE KIT BUMPER TO BUMPER FREON/RECHARGE KIT BUMPER TO BUMPER FUEL INJECTION CLEANER GOPHER STATE ONE-CAL CREDIT GOPHER STATE ONE-CAL LOCATES HEUSSER, JAMES AIRFARE - SAN DIEGO HEUS MINNCOMM PAGING PAGER SERVICES MORRIS STEVEN SAFETY BOOTS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE CAR END MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FILTER MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPL PAINT OTTO EXCAVATING, INC REPAIRS 816-820 TYLER REGINA MEDICAL CENTE JUNE WELLNESS TWIN CITY WATER CLIN BACTERIA ANALYSIS Total for Department 300 Total for Fund 600 12.50 746.32 946.32* 946.32* 758.71 758.71* 758.71* 2,516.00 468,711.88 3,567.75 93,698.83 568,494.46* 568,494.46* 499,459.40 810.00 7,190.00 10,400.00 12,451. 00 211.00 530,521.40* 530,521.40* 500.00 .14 2,485.10 20.22 35.13 25.53 14.89 -7.00 334.80 296.50 14.45 31. 65 10.09 16.60 42.13 4,536.00 40.00 160.00 8,556.23* 8,556.23* r Date: 06/12/2003 Department Time: 08:58:43 Operator: BECKY KLINE Page: 5 CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description -------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------ Amount PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS CITY CLERK CITY CLERK MCES JULY WASTEWATER SERVICE OTTO EXCAVATING. INC SEWER MAIN REPAIR REGINA MEDICAL CENTE JUNE WELLNESS Total for Department 300 Total for Fund 601 MOTOR PARTS SERVI CE BEAM / MARKERS MOTOR PARTS SERVICE FILTER Total for Department 107 Total for Fund 610 PARKS AND RECREATION AT&T LONG DISTANCE CHARGES PARKS AND RECREATION REGINA MEDICAL CENTE JUNE WELLNESS Total for Department 401 PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PLANNING PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLI C WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS Total for Fund 615 AT&T BRAUN PUMP & COUNTRY INN COUNTRY INN LONG DISTANCE CHARGES æmmOLE~I~ENTRENT~ & SUITES LODGING ALTENHOFEN & SUITES LODGING FORMAN COUNTRY INN & SUITES LODGING KREUSCHER COUNTRY INN & SUITES LODGING PRITZL/HEINSKE DUBE, DAVID K.R. WEST CO. INC. MAGUIRE AGENCY MN PIPE & EQUIPMENT MN PIPE & EQUIPMENT MN PIPE & EQUIPMENT MOTOR PARTS SERVICE PORTABLE BARGE SERVI SHARP MACHINE INC WASTE MANAGEMENT O-RINGS HOSE/SWIVEL/FITTINGS/SEA HYDRO BOILER COUPLINGS PIPE/COUPLINGS/CEMENT/CL PIPE/COUPLINTS/PRIMER/CE CABLE TIES DEMOBILIZE BARGE/LABOR LABOR/PINS ROLL OFF RENTAL Total for Department 300 Total for Fund 620 BDM CONSULTING ENGIN SOUTH OAKS 2ND PLAN REVI Total for Department 150 BDM CONSULTING ENGIN CENTURY SOUTH BDM CONSULTING ENGIN CENTURY SOUTH 2ND BDM CONSULTING ENGIN CENTURY SOUTH 4T PLAN RE BDM CONSULTING ENGIN CENTURY SOUTH 4TH ADD PL BDM CONSULTING ENGIN CENTURY SOUTH 4TH ADDN BDM CONSULTING ENGIN CENTURY SOUTH 5TH ADDN BDM CONSULTING ENGIN FORD GARAGE BDM CONSULTING ENGIN HASTINGS SENIOR APT 62,053.33 5,704.50 10.00 67,767.83* 67,767.83* 26.00 77.70 103.70* 103.70* 1.98 30.00 31. 98* 31. 98* 61. 90 4,579.50 216.24 72 .08 504.56 504.56 15.00 64.34 26,130.00 50.23 854.88 229.31 47.93 26,884.00 2,539.00 71. 05 62,824.58* 62,824.58* 250.00 250.00* 890.00 148.00 62.50 1,037.00 37.00 259.00 37.00 37.00 T """""",""......",.......,.".".......--....,....-...,.....,...,"".,..'. ".,>",..>....,,'>"""-"""""""" ..', ,,',..""""""""."'-""""" Date: 06/12/2003 Department Time: 08:58:44 Operator: BECKY KLINE . ..",' ."""",.",,'.. """",,',".'.'.,"" '..>", """"_""""~_,""",>""""",.."",,,,"",""',,~....,,,~.~_."~--'--~-",-'»Ü"""~'".",".."",~""""", Page: 6 CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description -------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------ Amount PUBLIC WORKS PUBLI C WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC .WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS BDM CONSULTING ENGIN HIGH VIEW EST PLAN REVIE BDM CONSULTING ENGIN MARKETPLACE WEST INSPECT BDM CONSULTING ENGIN PLEASANT ACRES BDM CONSULTING ENGIN RIVERDALE BDM CONSULTING ENGIN RIVERWOOD INSP BDM CONSULTING ENGIN SIEBEN'S CREST INSP BDM CONSULTING ENGIN SOUTH OAKS BDM CONSULTING ENGIN SOUTH PINES 4TH BDM CONSULTING ENGIN SUMMIT HEIGHTS INSP BDM CONSULTING ENGIN VELLEY MANOR II LOT 2 BL BDM CONSULTING ENGIN WALLIN 10TH ADDN BDM CONSULTING ENGIN WALLIN WEST BDM CONSULTING ENGIN WALMART BDM CONSULTING ENGIN WESTVIEW COMMONS - WENDY Total for Department 300 Total for Fund 807 Grand Total 125.00 185.00 1,886.00 148.00 1,295.00 111. 00 111.00 979.00 37.00 559.50 11,752.00 1,332.00 37.00 148.00 21,213.00* 21,463.00* 1,403,825.90* r June 16, 2003 Mayor Werner CITY OF HAST I NGS 1 01 4TH Street East Hastings, MN 55033-1955 651/437-4127 Memo To: City Council From: Becky Kline Finance Department. Date: 06/10/2003 The attached Department Report itemizes vouchers that were paid on June 10, 2003. Thank you. - r """"""""""""""""'-""'W Date: 06/10/2003 Department Time: 10:13:18 Operator: BECKY KLINE Page: 1 CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description -------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------ Amount COUNCIL AND MAYOR ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY CLERK POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE POLICE CONTROLLED AIR REFUND PERMIT OVERPAY MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT CONNELL/ CS 001435452601 MN CHILD SUPPORT PMT PUCH/CS 00138614701 & 00 Total for Department 000 SALVERDA, DONALD E COUNCIL/DEPT GOAL SETTIN Total for Department 102 GRAPHIC DESIGN ENVELOPES IKON OFFICE SOLUTION COPIES / QUARTERLY Total for Department 105 HASTINGS HASTINGS HASTINGS HASTINGS STAR GAZETT LEGAL/ PLANNING COMM STAR GAZETT LEGAL/MARSHAN TOWNSHIP STAR GAZETT LEGAL/ SO OAKS 2ND STAR GAZETT LEGAL/VARIANCE HAAS 1009 Total for Department 107 AT & T WIRELESS MDT MONTHLY SITE LEASE GERRY'S FIRE PROTECT FIRE EXTINGUISHER RECHAR GRAPHIC DESIGN STATIONERY IKON OFFICE SOLUTION COPIES / QUARTERLY MID-AMERICAN SPECIAL BIKE SAFETY BOOKS UNIFORMS UNLIMITED MCMENOMY UNIFORMS Total for Department 201 BUILDING AND INSPECT MCES APRIL SAC BUILDING AND INSPECT O'BRIEN, JOE CHEVROL 7 MONTHS VEHICLE LEASE BUILDING AND INSPECT STATE OF MN BOARD OF 2 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION Total for Department 230 PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLI C WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLI C WORKS BAHLS SERVICE FITTING CARLSON TRACTOR & EQ SWITCH CHESLEY TRUCK & TRAI AXLE SHAFT CHESLEY TRUCK & TRAI HOSE DOERER' S GENUINE PAR BELT G & K SERVICES MAT / TOWEL RENTAL N. W. ASPHALT MAINTEN CRACK SEAL RADKE ELECTRIC REPAIR STREET LIGHT SOLBERG AGGREGATE CO RI P RAP Total for Department 300 Total for Fund 101 PARKS AND RECREATION DOERER I S GENUINE PAR ANTENNA PARKS AND RECREATION DOERER I S GENUINE PAR BATTERY/ CABLE PARKS AND RECREATION GRAPHIC DESIGN WAIVER CARDS PARKS AND RECREATION IKON OFFICE SOLUTION COPIES / QUARTERLY PARKS AND RECREATION LEEF BROTHERS, INC. LAV / SHOP TOWELS PARKS AND RECREATION MTI DISTRIBUTING COM IRRIGATION REPAIR PARTS PARKS AND RECREATION MTI DISTRIBUTING COM MOWER REPAIR PARTS 40.00 230.73 633.13 903.86* 2,811.82 2,811. 82* 177.86 1,619.76 1,797.62* 29.60 8.00 24.00 32.00 93.60* 355.00 34.45 123.54 275.37 406.85 148.35 '1,343.56* 95,931.00 4,786.18 50.00 100,767.18* 5.30 48.24 153.52 58.48 27.16 123.70 15,000.24 125.00 785.30 16,326.94* 124,044.58* 23.84 50.25 20.24 40.50 44.51 118.40 126.67 r ,-,.,.',"",'.."" '.."",,",."'~""""'_""_'_""""""""'" ,...-..-....--.-'- Date: 06/10/2003 Time: 10:13:18 operator: BECKY KLINE CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice payment - Department Report Department Vendor Name Description -------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------ Amount PARKS AND RECREATION NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONE SERVICE PARKS AND RECREATION NINE EAGLES PROMOTIO CLOTHING PARKS AND RECREATION RADKE ELECTRIC INSTALL GROUND WIRE PARKS AND RECREATION REIS,INC WATER SPRINKLERS PARKS AND RECREATION SUPERIOR WIRELESS OF BATTERY Total for Department 401 Total for Fund 200 PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS PARKS AND RECREATION COMARK GOVERNMENT & PORTABLE DRIVE AND RECREATION GRAPHIC DESIGN DAILY ADMISSION CARDS AND RECREATION NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONE AND RECREATION NINE EAGLES PROMOTIO STAFF UNIFORMS AND RECREATION SANCO CLEANING SUPPL CLEANING SUPPLIES AND RECREATION STATE SUPPLY CO REPAIR PARTS Total for Department 401 Total for Fund 201 HERITAGE PRESERVATIO IKON OFFICE SOLUTION COPIES / QUARTERLY Total for Department 170 Total for Fund 210 FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE FIRE AMERIPRIDE LINEN & A LINEN SERVICE CHESLEY TRUCK & TRAI AMBULANCE REPAIRS H & H INDUSTRIES INC LIGHT BULBS HASTINGS FORD-JEEP-E AMBULANCE REPAIRS IKON OFFICE SOLUTION COPIES / QUARTERLY MIDTOWN FOOD CENTER STATION SUPPLIES TROPHIES PLUS CERTIFICATE MOUNTING Total for Department 210 AMBULANCE AMBULANCE SODERGREN BETTY ZOLL MEDICAL CORP REFUND OVERPAY CALL 2003 EKG PAPER Total for Department 220 Total for Fund 213 EQUIPMENT REVOLVING HASTINGS VEHICLE REG 2003 CHEV TRUCK/ TITLE & EQUIPMENT REVOLVING SUPERIOR FOAM WATER RIDER SPRING Total for Department 800 Total for Fund 403 HOUSING AND REDEVELO COMMERCIAL PARTNERS LOAN/ REHAB COSTS/ GUARD Total for Department 500 Total for Fund 404 Page: 2 236.30 240.00 161.15 12.76 31.90 1,106.52* 1,106.52* 40.99 7.99 125.23 1,717.75 171. 89 200.10 2,263.95* 2,263.95* 40.50 40.50* 40.50* 26.63 214.54 175.86 265.51 275.37 26.76 30.00 1,014.67* 25.00 95.06 120.06* 1,134.73* 1,039.15 472.50 1,511. 65* 1,511. 65* 150,000.00 150,000.00* 150,000.00* r ,'" :,:", ",'\', :. ,:' ' Date: 06/10/2003 Department ,',' " : "" "C' ,"',: , ", Time: 10: 13: 19 Operator: BECKY KLINE Page: 3 CITY OF HASTINGS FM Entry - Invoice Payment - Department Report Vendor Name Description -------------------- -------------------- ------------------------ ------------ Amount PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS. PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL TECH LABOR DPC INDUSTRIES, INC. HYDROFLOUR. ACID IKON OFFICE SOLUTION COPIES / QUARTERLY KLEINSCHMIDT VERONIC REFUND OVERPAY FINAL WAT KRANZ MARTY TED KRANZ NAT'L WATERWORKS NAT'L WATERWORKS NAT'L WATERWORKS Total REFUND OVERPAY FINAL WAT MXU CREDIT METERS / CONNECTIONS MXU'S / BRACKETS PLUGS for Department 300 Total for Fund 600 PARKS AND RECREATION NEXTEL COMMUNICATION CELL PHONE Total for Department 401 PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS PUBLIC WORKS Total for Fund 615 CONNELLY INDUSTRIAL TECH LABOR K.R. WEST CO. INC. REPAIRS REIS,INC SUPPLIES Total for Department 300 Total for Fund 620 Grand Total 354.52 523.58 68.82 86.50 18.90 138.45 917.75 656.56 27.21 2,792.29* 2,792.29* 167.80 167.80* 167.80* 4,375.44 2,106.00 24.16 6,505.60* 6,505.60* 289,567.62* ,:'"" ,è,,',..,":::,:'O:":,',',:':':'::':::':"(::::::\:',:':',:',-:,,:,:::::,::',:,:::,::,:,::: ,',~..o:,::':':,"',,:::; ,.. I ... MEJ",tORANDLJM.. , VI-2 To: From: Date: Re: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk June 12, 2003 Application for Gambling Premises Permit-Hastings Downtown Association at Hastings Family Services, located at 108 East 2nd Street Recommen~ City Council Action: Approve the attached Resolution, waiving the 30-day waiting period for the Hastings Downtown Association and authorizing the Hastings Downtown Association to conduct a raffle on September 20. 2003 at Hastings Family Service, 108 East 2nd Street. ~: Application has been received from the Hastings Downtown Association to conduct a raffle for their organization on September 20, 2003 at Hastings Family Service, 108 East 2nd Street. in Hastings. If Council should approve this application, the attached resolution will be sent to the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Board showing the City's approval to allow the raffle and also to waive the 30-day waiting period. The Gambling Control Board allows up to 5 licenses of this type to be issued to a nonprofit organization per year. The Council last approved a license for the Downtown Business Association in August 2000, June 2001 and May 2002. Should you have any concerns or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Attachment: Resolution-Waiving the 30 day waiting period for the Hastings Downtown Association at Hastings Family Service, 108 East 2nd Street. "- T" CITY OF HASTINGS CITY OF HASTINGS RESOLUTION NO. 06- -03 EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA HELD:JUNE 16,2003 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Hastings, Dakota and Washington Counties, Minnesota, was duly held at the City Hall in said City on the 16th of June, 2003 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. for the purpose in part of authorizing Resolution No. 06- -03, waiving the 3 O-day waiting period for the Hastings Downtown Association, and authorizing the Hastings Downtown Association to conduct a rame on September 20,2003 at Hastings Family Service, 108 East 2nd Street. The following Councilmembers were present: And the following Councilmembers were absent: Councilmember its adoption: introduced the following resolution and moved RESOLUTION NO. 06- -03 RESOLUTION WAIVING THE 30 DAY WAITING PERIOD FOR THE HASTINGS DOWNTOWN ASSOCIA TION TO CONDUCT A RAFFLE WHEREAS, the Hastings Downtown Association has presented an application to the City of Hastings to conduct a rame on September 20, 2003 at Hastings Family Service, 108 East 2nd Street in Hastings; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Lawful Gambling Board requires a Resolution be passed to waive the 3 O-day waiting period; and WHEREAS, the application for Exemption from lawful Gambling license has been presented; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hastings that the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized and directed to sign this resolution and forward to the Minnesota Department of Gaming, Gambling Control Division, showing the 30-day waiver and the approval of this application for an Exemption ITom Lawful Gambling License. '-r The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember and, after full discussion thereof and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Michael D. Werner, Mayor ATTEST: Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk (SEAL) - í VI-3 MEMO To: Mayor and City Councilmembers From: Tom Kusant, Facilities Maintenance Re: Elevator Maint. Contract The elevator maintenance contract is up for renewal. This is typically a three year contract. The elevators at City Hall and the Police Station are in excellent shape due to regular maintenance and minimal usage. The only contract change I am recommending is to go from a monthly service to a quarterly service due to the minimal usage the elevators get. This will save the City $648 dollars a year or $1944 dollars over the course of the contract. R&O Elevator has maintained the City's elevators since the City moved into these buildings in December 1993. There has never been problem with either elevator and they have been kept in excellent shape. The proposed contract from R&O Elevator is for quarterly service at $300 a quarter. I would recommend this contract with R&O Elevator to the City of Hastings. Sincerely, Tom Kusant - Facilities Maintenance æn~ ~~ - r VI-4 MEMO To: From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Tom Montgomery June 10,2003 2003 Sealcoat Program Authorize Advertisement for Bids Council is requested to authorize staff to advertise for bids for the 2003 Sealcoat Program. Enclosed are drawings illustrating the areas proposed for sealcoating - Sunset West development, mid-90s Wallin development, South Pines development, and East Hastings. The sealcoating work is planned for late July/early August. - - em oF HASTIN6S - r .. . . ... 0 0 CD § z+ g N 0 0 0 N I ~~-. i , - , ' ., ..........................,....... i f........(-",......(.>r','<~..) .' ./.....~ f-<>«:?- ......7; ,. - : ""," \\1........,............, " r"',~ ,',.. '....\" ..y'- '."<'<:.~.~,..'..., I........Q'/ i.~"'.::.::=~.ì;,. :.~,.... '!,».:;~~:~:~~~~:..:.......j "-)................. c..............., '\ '................, . '. ",""" T" ;... """""" ' . . :"""""""'1"""""""i , ¡"""""""'1"""""""1 r=l"..:n,:.t..., . . . , , """"""".......l... "" """"" ¡""""""""""'! ,.....,.............., ;"""""""""", i """""""""'1 -"""""""""""'--, ........................- -,......"......,...- """"""""""- ...........,......; ,..,.......... "".""""-""7"""'lf{:..{~[Y ..-., ¡""""""""j ;""""""""j ,... ........" ;"""""""", [::::::::::~::::1 t..---, .............. ,-...' l_....-.....--............,.,..... l_-- i I ¡ i i ,...............¡ ,/ ,/ ./ / L¡ 0 H .1 ",~~,,:,:I^Y SYIN ,......,.....,.. l................ ¡"""""""'\ / / / r""""""'¡ ... / / ........ !................, ..!-.."...-....-................-........ ........."............ Q) at e CI c:» ~ ... ~ II ',¡ ,~ a 1 I I I I e ~ 0 I.~ ~ m ';CI) þS ü~ ""-""T e ~ 0) .. e r~ ! ~ ~ ca 1~ þS .- C) CC'I CD ~ e II e ~ ... ~ g¡ ,i I~ 5 va .. Ct . I e ~ -..... - --.-. ........ - ........ -..-.--.-....... ._. -.... - .-.........-. -'-"'-'-- ... I I I I ¡ i I - --..-'" .-......... - ----I. ...-... .....-"'" -..... -.... .-.... ..._..,. . -.. LAKE LpCUST ~:tr r~~j ¡-:~~j WASH I Ii 1::=1 [=~i ..............."............. :..............1 j j . . . . [::::::::.:Jt.:::::::::.J ;...:::..ì:.:Jf::.:.:::::::::J f...............; ~..............., \...1\....... [::::::::::~l ['.=~~..~'i ,"""""""', r""""""""" L.............! L..............! ; [""""": f.........! I ¡ i """"""""'1 ; r""""""" , I It i / l I .J . ¡......../"" L""""'h'..I\.. F=I r~:3 \...............JL ,""""""""" ."""""""'" Jl.__: ¡"""""""'; [.~:.~~:::~::::¡ ¡"""""""1 ¡..-.........j L..............J [~:.::.~J [ 1- [==1 f=¡ l...............Jl................i ,................,...........""'" . .' . r~J E=}{ [ I I L I' ¡:::~~:":~~J ¡:":::'.:~~::';: ¡...............; ¡.............. ,¡ 'I ,................! L..............! j ""'."""'] :""""""""i ¡""""""""j ~'.":::::::] [:.:.::::==::.1 f.................! ¡............., r"""""""'" 8--..............................u) YLE R ...ST..........; ~ ~ 8 ..,. z+ ~ ~ 0 ~ '...............' \................! ,.............., .....-.....,.... 1""""""""1 t::::j~.j.:::j ,................! riE~~EJ r"""""""" ,................, i ¡I ¡ [::.:.:'.:~::=] !::::::~::~:::! ,................, ,..-..."...... [~:::::] t~:::~:::~;,: : ,: . C:I::J t~::::::::::.J . .' ,...........i...i ,_..L.h.) .,.1""""""""': :"""""""'"] Ii :................1 I................! ¡::~:::I:::T'."'."'" r"""¡""""¡""""L.......¡ [ i L . .' . . . . . ,........,.................L.....' 'h"""""'! """h.; ,. '" , L:~~:.r::.::.j l....1.11....\ t""'h""""'¡ L~::::.'~.:::::::! . .' . ¡,f."..'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'" ¡"""""""j .i L...............! ,-.......,.......;,................, . . . . ¡.......j I' , ", . :::::::..~:::~::¡ ¡"""""""h! f""""""" 1""""""'1 ¡:::::::::::::::1[:::."::::::': [:::.:::.::::~J t::U::~:J [ I... i"""""""".! L::::~:::] L.............J ................! [................, ,....................................' ~¥f~~:~ ¡T"""'" ; ,................, ,..............; ri:::~~:~~:J 1"",,""'1 t..."."h"'.! t................1 ¡...................................; ,"""""""" ,................, I ¡............! ...i !- f.....t"""i I [ :......1........1 L........L....! """"",h"," h""""'" T "----'.-"""""""""""""""""'T""""'---"'" i I I I I i I I !............................. i ! , j ¡ , Ie¡) 1m /' Z m ~ r¡ fir - m ..............................\ m" !m :~ ,.,r"""""""""""','"i ... ' ...,..... .....¡...",....,....,' .\',""'-"-.'-"--'---"-'-- . .., <......".. ' ......................."..................... .' , ... / . -, .....",...- "\ \". ¡\ . / ".. // -,t""'" > :.~~~.~~~........................................ \.. ..............................,.,' ......." " , ".,.,...,..,.,..............,.....-/ '- "... . / / /.." " \ !:~::..~:::::::::;;~;:;/":::::;:..,..> I j , """""'" \\ \ "....'¡- -'r --rT-rr-T'-"'--'--"'TJ!,!ii,~f/;t~,~~:~,:~'..:':'>,...... ~,:~:<.. ,'r""--------' --.........--- """"'r~f:.I~~ti~~_}\~-~:~~~= , ' 14TH ST' W' , ' ' ,'" ' .""f::"~=""""-"""-' -- T ' '",,\ \T:"/ ~g: l"=~~~=A ~:~.fj\~~ä~~ ~R¡j:;;"¡;;{~j~ji(~.._....;:~;,;:\~~t;;!:~~j;l~~;~ ~~~!;~l ¿:}~:{~~";~~":::.;:\ \,:\-:5 ["'-"""r"""¡-"""T"""'¡"""T""'T"'",...,..!"", ,.... \ ""'r ~......~"~:.L:':::L:::::::t'-"~'T.L""i..!"""/""'+""""\ \...........t-; ..... [~~':::~~J"-""'" ¡....../....< j-.- r""">...../ ! ! \ : ' l::::"!.,.,.-,,.!,......t .........-,..........'- "...'...' ,...., . . ,TRL " ""'+""'+""".r i \ ! /~ ,( í .h 'J STQN"..,n"l ¡ ; 'v . //-,....,::::::=~;a~~_L_~ \ :~~J~-~'.::~/): (>¡~Ç~!f RD:--tLLLL\ FFFf \ . ~ ,-< ^ " -" - "",,'_...---- I ~ -'<" . /\ 1----\ ,--C:J C=\ ---TT ,,;f:t- . Y /, \,"""""""'l,i ,...."..",.. '1,' ,.., ' '1\ ~N "'-"'\"'/\" t.,........., , :"""-""""'l:,....,.....--i" r"""""""; ""'¡"'¡'r""'T""""¡""""'fT"""r"""""""r""""'""""\ ,;i:¡,',',',-,',',',',4..Î;:'"",','.',',',4..:",:',',',",,',',',~I_i" . .~.. i"""'-""'" L...,oo,.....,i..oo,..loo.....,L.......ooL......L..,.....U........i....oo,l.........L....,l.........,j'. ! $¡: \ '\/' 'j-..,_....,...,:, (""""""'¡,""" , ¡"""""'T""'.""] , ......."..... \1 ,:". " ,','.:,':,', \",:,"~,~.,-',',;~,.......",. \"""""'~...,.,.........,: r""""""""','" ¡,i: ""r-""""""""')""""'" . .. .' !"........"'!.............~ ,.....", .. ! ; 1\ i /\/\ \ \ '\"':'~=:.".,;:,:,: (~:,~ (~=t,,'~,j .,,~L.-.l,./~~./';,:\.;'.è,',:.~,;l,:;~.."",...,..j,.',."':..L......J I 1\""",,/«\,,\;:;:\ ," ;" '~. I'. ,/ . . . I \ .." , / . . '\;oo, .. ..,. " -" .' .' . ,>. ....." .. " . .. .. :::, '/" { , , I ¡ \""",,,..{",'.l." '" ,/ ' ,....",................,...,....".. i I \ \L\>;~: ,j.l,:/f-:~>;;<:~tI;~f . L=I N + i I j 1 City of Hastings 2003 Sea/coat Program 0 400 Feet Public Works Garage 200 , 200 ¡ I i i ¡.-"."---,,...,......--.....-. I "....--.------...l........! '.., .../ ealcoat Area. ern' OF 11AST11116S ......................L~~ 55 ¡,........"............... .i,! E:::J \ ,"", ! I if:;}}:] \ if"""! ' \ \~\ [~~¡ ["""""""'!""'\' ,r""""""".l \ ;...........:1 r"""""'" ,................, ¡..............,; :.".".......,,; \""""""j ,.... ,..-1,,"""""":,/ \ ' i "i .."..,.........' , ' i ""n.., i t:::::::\ L .."...",...., ! : !""""'!""""!""""', ["""T"""';""'1' ...' i ¡"""'I : I........' ;,..,........".."....,.........;.".."...........,.............,........[,............... """""""""""""""""""""""""",,""""""""""""""""""', ,"""""""""""""""""""'-""""""'" , ¡.....".................,......,..,....,.................: C ARLETØ "-,ORin ;............."......",;......,..L. ..................,........".. ,.........,.......,;:::::;:",:;.................,..,.............., i[]IV~;ç~'¡ ", r:::::::! ¡,.............., L.....! ...,............!................, ,..,.... ....,......i ¡............¡-........-".....¡ \.....".....,..: \.......,L..~...L..L....,;........, i.".........".; j....".........! \..............\ ! ! ! ' ¡ ¡ \ \ ! ! ¡......""...... :,.....,........~.. :'::::..::::,::::\ , ì r""""""""""'\ ¡.............".........\ , ì ,..........."....,....".....\ ¡...."....",..,: L.......,....) ;................ ;"....-...,..\ (""""""""1 r"""""""" ; , \,.............¡ . ' ¡"......,....,,""""""" \....,..,....,..\"""""""'1 \"..........,\""""""'1 , ¡ j (""""""'1"""""""'\ ,.......,......,.. ¡......".. t............,r"-'-""1 ¡:",:':::\..',..:'¡':::::'[ L........L.......L..,...L ¡"""'1"""'1""""\"""'1 ¡"-""'\""r....\....,..1 r-~-1L..... \ \ \ T VI-5 MEMO To: From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Tom Montgomery June 10, 2003 Authorize Assessment of 8 ewer Repair- 203 15th 81. W. Enclosed is a request from the property owner at 203 15th 8t. W. requesting City funding of their sanitary sewer service repair within the 15th 81. right of way and assessing the cost back to the homeowner. The City Council has approved a number of sanitary sewer repair assessments in the past, and is requested to approve this request. - em' oF HASTIN 6S ._- r June 2, 2003 To whom it may concern: I reside at 203 15th Street West, and need to hire a contractor to come in to excavate and repair my broken sewer service. I am requesting that you defer the total cost of the repairs by assessing the charges against my property. I agree to waive all rights to appeal this assessment. ~ - ~ /..(} / -~ ~ --- T Ø> \ Request For Payment Date: June 09, 2003 Project: 2002 General Sieben Drive Contractor: McNama~a Contracting Request Number: 5 Payment Period: 5/1/2003 - 5/31/2003 ITEM I ORIGINAL BID I I CO l\lP LET ED I This Period II To D~\te I I Unit I Quantit)" I Unit Price III Qunntit,. I Amount II Quantit)'" I I Amount I L 2002 General Sieben Drive 1.5" non-metalic conduit LF 500 $3.50 300 $1,050.00 600 $2,100.CO 10" gate valve & box Each 2 $1,645.00 I 0 $0.00 2 $3,290.00 10" waterrnain ductile iron cI 52 LF 547 $37.50 I 0 $0.00 515.5 $19,331.25 10" wet tap Each 1 $5,180.00 0 $0.00 1 $5,180.00 12" FES with trash guard Each 1 $1,015.00 0 $0.00 1 $1,015.00 12" RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 CL V LF 696 $37.10 0 $0.00 720 $26,712.00 15" FES with trash guard Each 3 ; $1,107.00 0 $0.00 4 $4,428.00 15" RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 CL V LF 775 $39.20 0 $0.00 764 $29,948.80 18" FES with trash guard Each 1 $1,200.00 0 $0.00 1 $1,200.00 18" RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 CL V LF 173 $41.90. 0 $0.00 197 $13,254.30 I 21" RC pipe sewer des 3006 cl v LF 336 $52.oo! 0 $0.00 333 $17,316.00 I 24" FES with trash guard Each 2 $1,730.00; 0 $0.00 2 $3,460.00 24" RC pipe sewer des 3006 cI v LF 224 $69.85 0 $0.00 196 $13,690.60 36" FES with trash guard Each 1 $2,760.00 0 $0.00 1 $2,760.00 36" RC pipe sewer des 3006 cI v LF 81 $162.10 0 $0.00 372.2 $60,333.62 < - 4" Concrete Walk SF 17000 $5.85 17166.17 $100.422.09 17166.17 $100,422.09. en 4" gate valve & box Each 1 $720.00 0 $0.00 1 $720.00 4" perf pipe drain LF 85 $15.00 0 $0.00 90 $1,350.00 4" ridged steel conduit LF 441 $15.75 0 $0.00 556 $3,757.00 4" watermain ductile iron cl 52 LF 39 $31.00 0 $0.00 8.6 $266.60 5' Concrete Sidewalk SF 4827.95 $5.35 4827.95 $25,829.53 4827.95 $25,829.53 6" Concrete Driveway Pavement SY 16 $50.00 0 $0.00 181.46 $9,073.00 6" ductile iron pipe sewer cI 52 (0-8' depth) LF 36 $60.80 0 $0.00 11.5 $699.20 6" gate valve & box Each 1 $835.00 0 $0.00 2 $1,670.00 Page 1 of 7 '""1 ITElVl I ORIGINAL BID I II COl\fPLETEU Th is Pc riot! II To [)atl~ I I Uni~ ¡-Quantit)' IllInit Price IIII Quantit)' II Amount II Quantity II Amount I 6" PVC Scb 40 Sanitary Sewer Pipe 0' - 8' depth LF 86 $21.50 0 $0.00 86 $1,849.00 6" Watermain Ductile Iron CL 52 LF 58 $31.70 0 $0.00 56.75 $1,798.98 8" DIP Sanitary Sewer Pipe CI 52 LF 35.5 $64.00 0 $0.00 35.5 $2,272.00 8" gate valve & box Each 4 $1,143.00 0 $0.00 3 $3,429.00 8" Outside Drop Sanitary Manhole LF 5.9 $350.00 0 $0.00 5.9 $2,065.00 8" PVC Pipe sewer sdr 35 (0-8' depth) LF 95 $27.20 0 $0.00 39[) $1 O,82~)(O 8" PVC pipe sewer sdr 35 (10'-12' depth) LF 50 $31.90 0 $0.00 1435 $4,57765 8" PVC pipe sewer sdr 35 (16'-18' depth) LF 335 $75.55 0 $0.00 2 $151.10 8" PVC SDR 35 Sanitary Sewer Pipe 8' - 10' depth LF 289 $29.55 0 $0.00 289 $8,539.95 8" Watermain Ductile Iron CL 52 LF 461 $33.10 0 $0.00 422 $13,968.20 8.0' Bury Hydrant Each 1 $1,450.00 0 $0.00 1 $1,450.00 Adjust Frame & Ring Casting Each 4 $450.00 6 $2.ïOOOO 6 $.',700 CO Adjust Gate Valve Boxes Each 1 $350.00 0 $0.00 1 $350.00 Adjust Gate Valves Ea 10 $350.00 10 $3,500.00 10 $3,500.00 Aggregate Base cI 5 (cv) Cy 5875 $21 .50 96.95 $2,084.43 7(365 1:, :f;¡ en 1 OO.!3 B--624 Curb & Gutter LF 308 $20.00 308 $6,160.00 308 $6,160.00 Bituminous Material for Tack Coat Gal 1799 $2.50 0 $0.00 250 $625.00 Bituminous Non-wear course (Iv3) Ton 2300 $35.60 150.7 $5,364.92 3172 Ie $ ì ¡:;',9~:Ó:;O Bituminous Non-wear course (mv3) Ton 2328 $35.60 0 $0.00 971 .4 $34,581.84 ... Bituminous Wear Course (mv4) Ton 1920 $39.20 32.88 $1,288.90 130.48 $5,114.82 bollard Each 32 $545.00 32 $17,440.00 32 $17,440.00 casting assembly (r-1642) each 3 $700.00 0 $0.00 3 $2,100.00 casting assembly (r-2501) Each 1 $590.00 0 $0.00 1 $590.00 casting assembly a-7d (storm) Each 1 $710.00 0 $0.00 1 $710.00 catch basin casting assembly r-3067-v (storm) each 22 $690.00 0 $0.00 22 $15,180.00 Clearing Tree 2 $250.00 0 $0.00 3 :¡;75UCO Common Excavation (ev)(p) Cy 8308 $12.10 149.85 $1,813.19 ¿;.19/ 11 í U.:,<31 ~)C'j Concrete curb & gutter b618 LF 9215 $8.30 120 $996.00 7793.5 $64,686.05 Concrete Walk Revised SF 5302 $8.55 5302 $45,332.10 5302 $45,332.1 0 connect to exist storm sewer Each 9 $1,267.00 0 $0.00 13 ';,1 C,:fi'I.CO consruct drainage structure des 66-4020 Each 1 $4,426.00 0 $0.00 1 $4,426.00 construct drainage structure des 48-4020 Each 9 $2,120.50 0 $0.00 1 1 ~¡;23,3~ì5.50 Page 2 of 7 i I i lTElVl ORIGINAL BID ... construct drainage structure des 60-4020 construct drainage structure design s-10 Construct Sanitary Manhole deciduous shrub #2 cont deciduous tree 2.0" cal B&B Disk Anchoring erosion control blanket category 2 Extra #1 Extra #2 F&I sign panel type c geotextile fabric Granular Borrow(cv)(2)(3) Grubbing handhole Incentive Bonus (per addendum) inlet protection filter aggregate install lighting system (7 lights) install salvaged 24" end section install salvaged casting install salvaged hydrant insulation irrigation system Kentucky Coffee Trees landscape edger Manhole overdepth Mill Bituminous Surface (full depth) Mobilization Mulch ornamental tree 1.5" cal B&B Overlay Trail-Spec Pavement Marking Removal (SF) Pedestrian curb ramp I Unit II Quantit~'11 Unit Price I Each 3 $3,390.00 Each 12 $1,349.40 Each 5 $3,600.00 shrub 362 $42.00 Tree 113 $300.00 Acre 2 $240.00 SY 25 $4.20 Each 1 $22,623.00 Each 1 $4,097.67 SF 307 $25.50 SY 100 $5.00 CY 600 $10.25 Tree 2 $250.00 Each 6 $895.00 LS 1 $25,000.00 Each 14 $200.00 LS 1 $40,500.00 Each 2 $435.00 each 2 $200.00 Each 3 $1,297.00 SY 20 $25.95 LS 1 $8,300.00 Ea 19 $325.00 LF 400 $5.25 LF 40 $156.60 SY 5773 $2.50 lump sum 1 $85,000.00 Acre 2 $240.00 Tree 24 $273.00 LF 760 $4.77 SF 3050 $2.35 Each 5 $300.00 CO¡VIPLETED I This Period II To Oatc I I Quantit~'11 Amount II Quantity II Amount I 0 0 0 3ïO 120 0 600 0 0 133.75 0 0 0 6 0 0 0.85 0 0 0 0 0.7 19 329.5 0 0 0.15 0 24 760 0 4 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15.54000 $36,000.00 $0.00 $252000 $0.00 $0.00 $3,410.63 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,370.00 $0.00 $0.00 $34,425.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $5,810.00 $6,175.00 $1,729.88 $0.00 $0.00 $12,750.00 $0.00 $6,552.00 $3,625.20 $0.00 $1,200.00 4 1 -f 5 T70 120 2 600 1 1 320.:25 131 3 159.01 :3 20 1 1 0.85 2 2 3 3.57 0.85 19 329.5 14.46 C¡(:;,éj') 1 2 24 760 180 4 :\)GOCO :~1 d.89i .CO $18,000.00 $1 ~:;,~J4()CO 't,:::.::) ,000 Co $480.00 ~.:::,:)20CO $22,623.00 $4,097.67 1 Öi3:3Ò :[C~-j6.!: 0 $1,629.85 S750.CC) 'f;1ï.900CO $25,000.00 $200.00 $34,425.00 $870.00 $400.00 $3,891 .00 $92.64 $7,055.00 $6,175.00 $1,729.88 $2,264.44 T 1~,707.50 $85,000.00 $480.00 $6,552.00 $3,625.20 $423.00 $1,200.00 Page 3 of 7 ITEIVI I ORIGINAL BID "I COl\1PLETED This Period II To Date I I Unit II Quantit)' II Unit Price II I Quantit),11 Amount II Quantity II Amount I perennial #1 cont Pit 398 $21 ,00 397 $8,337.00 397 $8,337.00 Protective Ramping of Concrete Curb LF 7943 $2.75 0 $0.00 7943 $21,843.25 random riprap clill Cy 46 $145.00 0 $0.00 45 $6,525.00 Reinforced Concrete Cross Gutters SF 1184.4 $6.75 0 $0.00 1184.4 $7,994.70 Remove Bituminous Pavement (full depth) SF 914 $5.00 430.44 $2,152.20 778.11 $3,890.55 Remove bituminous trail SY 245 $10.00 170.67 $1,706.70 Ö72.<39 i;Ó,72i3S0 Remove catch basin Each 3 $475.00 0 $0.00 3 $1,425.00 Remove Concrete Curb & Gutter LF 3527 $5.50 413 $2,271 .50 3951 :Þ21 ,7JO.SO Remove concrete walk SY 3205 $9. 00 198.76 $1,788.84 658.1 $5,922.90 Remove Culvert LF 90 $23.75 0 $0.00 50 $1,187.50 Remove Loop Detectors Each 4 $130.00 0 $0.00 9 '[;1 ,170CO Remove Sewer (Storm) LF 156 $23.75 0 $0.00 23~~ 5i D.uO Remove Sign Each 16 $25.00 1 $25.00 18 $450C) revised signal system signal 1 $147,000.00 0.75 $110,250.00 1 $147,000.00 Rock Excavation (ev)(1 )(2) CY 10 $140.00 0 $0.00 5 $700.00 Salvage 15" end section Each 2 $102.00 0 $0.00 2 $204.00 Salvage 24" end section Each 2 $142.10 0 $0.00 2 $284.20 Salvage casting each 2 $142.10 0 $0.00 1 $142.10 Salvage hydrant each 3 $475.00 0 $0.00 3 $1,425.00 Sawing Bit Pavement (full depth) LF 1577 $4.50 61 $274.50 221 $994.50 -! seed mixture 80B acre 2 $2,550.00 0 $0.00 2 $5,100.00 Select topsoil borrow (cv) CY 760 $27.50 518.8 $14,267.00 518.8 $14,267.00 Sodding Type Lawn SY 3000 $2.35 2235.75 $5,254.01 2235.75 $5,254.01 sodding type salt resistant SY 694 $4.20 520.5 $2,186.10 520.5 $2,186.1 0 Subgrade excavation (ev)(2) CY 1180 $12.10 0 $0.00 1 '1')0 (jÎ . . eçe c:'- 1 I .,J,),).",,] temp 24" solid line white paint LF 195 $2.35 0 $0.00 2(),) ~:W()Cj temp 4" broken line white paint LF 1785 $0.10 0 $0.00 624 $62.40 temp 4" double solid line yellow paint LF 170 $3.15 0 $0.00 707 Z~7.C5 temp 4" solid line white paint LF 650 $1.60 0 $0.00 ",¡:,'-c ~A,2C)400 -,;C<'J temp pavmt message (left arrow) paint Each 5 $53.00 0 $0.00 5 $265.00 temp pavrnt message (left thru arrow) paint Each 1 $80.00 0 $0.00 to ~¡,400.CO 'J temp pavmt message (only) paint Each 1 $80.00 0 $0.00 ¡) :Þ640C'O " Page 4 of 7 ITEM temp pavmt message (right arrow) paint temp zebra crosswalk white paint temporary signal system Topsoil Borrow (cv) Traffic Control watermain fittings -I ORIGINAL BID ~itl L Quanti!)' II Unit Price I Each 3 $53.00 $1.90 $154,500.00 $23.50 $11 ,500.00 $4.50 SF 1278 sys 1 Cy 780 LS 1 LB 2400 Subtotal CO]VIPLETED I This Period II To Date I I Quantit)'I! Amount II Quantity II Amount I 0 $0.00 6 :;;31 d 00 0 $0.00 414 $786.60 0 $0.00 1 $154,500.00 247.45 $5,815.08 247.45 $5,815.08 0.1 $1,150.00 0.9 $10,350.00 0 $0.00 2190 $9,855.00 $504,566.78 $1,860,325.74 Page 5 of 7 CITY OF HASTINGS 2002 General Sieben Drive Payment Summary 5/1/2003 through 5/31/2003 PROJECTS: 2002 General Sieben Drive TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE: -1 I This Period II Total To Date I $504,566.78 $1,860,325.74 $504,566.78 $1,860,325.74 Page 6 of 7 PayEst..~ Period Retainage Payment 1 9/1/2002 - 9/30/2002 $0.00 $687,282.10 2 10/112002 - 10/27/2002 $10,490.33 $492,819.13 3 11/1/2002 - 11130/2002 $6,090.43 $115,718.14 4 12/1/2002 - 4/26/2003 $2,699.63 $51,292.93 5 5/1/2003 - 5/31/2003 $25,221.17 $468,711.88 [ $44,501.56 . $~,815,824.18 I í , i , City of Hastings 2002 General Sieben Drive Application for Payment Number 5 Period Ending: 5/31/2003 Contractor: McNamara Contracting 5001 160 St. W. Rosemount, MN 55068 Contractor 4~ ../... Engineer --d m/ Approved by Owner PAYMENT. SUM MARY: -1 TOTALS TO DATE: Date '//0/0..3 Date Date Total Completed to Date: Less Retainage: Less Previous Payment: Total Amount Due: $1,860,325.74 $44,501 .56 $1,347,112.30 $468,711.88 Page 7 of 7 . Date: June 09, 2003 Project: 2003-6 General Sieben Drive Ex Contractor: A-1 Excavating, Inc. Request Number: 2 Payment Period: 5/1/2003 - 5/31/2003 ITEM """1 2003-6 General Sieben Drive Extension & Bridge 1" CORPORATION STOP 1" CURB STOP AND BOX 1" TYPE K COPPER 12" GV AND BOX 12" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V 12" WM DUCTILE IRON CL 52 12" WM DUCTILE IRON CL 52 (PIPE RIVER CROSSING) 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V 16" GV AND BOX 16" WM DUCTILE IRON CL 50 18" FES WITH TRASH GUARD 18" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V 21" RC PIPE SEV\JER DES 3006 CL III 21" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V 27" FES WITH TRASH GUARD 27" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III 30" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V 4" C-900 FORCEMAIN 4" C-900 FORCEMAIN, (PIPE RIVER CROSSING) 4" INSULATION 4" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 26 (SEWER SERVICE) 42" FES WITH TRASH GUARD 42" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL 111 48" DIA. DRILLED SHAFT (EARTH)' Request For Payment ORIGINAL BID COl\tPLETED I This Period II To D~\tl~ J I Quantit~'11 Amount I Quantit)' I Amount] I Unit II Quanti!)-II Unit Price I EA 4 $60.00 4 $240.00 4 $240.00 EA 4 $85.00 4 $340.00 4 $340 . 00 LF 190 $15.50 192 $2,976.00 192 $2,976.00 EA 9 $1,300.00 6 $7,800.00 9 $11,700.00 LF 638 $22.00 631 $13,882.00 631 $13,882.00 ! LF 4000 $26.00 I 2290 $59,540.00 3588 $93,288.00 LF 100 $89.00 98 $8,722.00 98 $8,722.00 I LF 1187 $20.00 1184 $23,680.00 1184 $23,680.00 EA 1 $3,600.00 0 $0.00 1 $3,600.00 LF 45 $41.50 0 $0.00 40 $1,660.00 EA 3 $675.00 1 $675.00 1 $675.00 LF 262 $22.00 213 $4,686.00 213 $4,686.00 LF 55 $26.00 55 $1,430.00 55 $1,430.00 LF 205 $26.00 129 $3,612.00 129 $3,612.00 , EA 1 $1,160.00 1 $1,160.00 1 $1,160.00 < - LF 361 $36.00 ;. 374 $13,464.00 374 $13,464.00 I LF 33 $46.oo ! 24 $1,104.00 24 ~ $1,104.00 LF 730 $11.75 268 $3,149.00 268 $3,149.00 LF 100 $76.00 ¡ 98 $7,448.00 98 $7,448.00 ¡ Sy 20 $32.00 28.44 $910.0ß 28.44 $910'('3 LF 200 $14.oo ! 218 $3,052.00 21ß $::1,052.00 I I EA 1 $1,975.00 1 $1,975.00 1 $1,975.00 LF 125 $73.00 i 96 $7,006.00 96 $7,008.00 LF 98 $202.17 17.3 $3,497.54 63.7 $12,878.23 Page 1 of 5 IT EJ\rl I ORIGINAL BID I I I CO!\') PLETED This Period II Tn Date I ~~!~ Quantity IlJnit Price I I Quantit~'11 Amount II Quantity II Amount ] 48" DIA. DRILLED SHAFT (ROCK) LF 88 $317.88 33.9 $10,776.13 67.3 $21,393.32 6" GV AND BOX EA 4 $655.00 3 $1,965.00 4 $2,620.00 6" HYD EA 4 $1,700.00 3 $5,100.00 4 $6,800.00 6" WM DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LF 80 $22.50 59 $1,327.50 71 $1,597.50 8" C-900 PIPE SEWER LF 354 $57.00 282 $16,074.00 282 $16,074.00 8" C-900 PIPE SEWER, (PIPE RIVER CROSSING) LF 100 $98.00 98 $9,604.00 98 $9,604.00 8" GV AND BOX EA 13 $840.00 7 $5,880.00 13 $10,920.00 8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (0-12' DEPTH) LF 447 $13.25 0 $0.00 447 $5,922.75 8" PVC PIPE SEWER SDR 35 (16-18' DEPTH) LF 295 $20.50 120 $2,460.00 '}i:;() { }9U CD 8" Wrvl DUCTILE IRON CL 52 LF 1020 $23.50 343 $8,060.50 897 $21,079.50 8" X 4" WYE EA 4 $55.00 0 $0.00 4 $220.00 AGG BASE CL 5- STREET TON 18940 $7.65 4304.9 $32,932.49 4304.9 $32,932.49 CONNECT TO EX STORM SEWER EA 6 $550.00 5 $2,750.00 5 $2,750.00 CONNECT TO EX WM EA 6 $100.00 1 $100.00 5 $500.00 CaNST 8" OUTSI DE DROP LS 2 $1,000.00 1 $1,000.00 2 $2,000.00 CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES. 4020-48 EA 1 $1,075.00 1 $1,075.00 1 $1,075.00 CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES. 4020-60 EA 2 $1,750.00 1 $1,750.00 1 $1,750.00 CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES. 4020-72 EA 1 $2,225.00 1 $2,225.00 1 $2,225.00 CaNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES. 4022-48 EA 7 $1,075.00 7 $7,525.00 7 $7,525.00 -1 caNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES. 4022-60 EA 4 $1,750.00 4 $7,000.00 4 $7,000.00 caNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DES. 4022-72 EA 1 $2,225.00 1 $2,225.00 1 $2,225.00 caNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN S-10 EA 19 $550.00 19 $10,450.00 19 $10,450.00 caNST DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN S-10A EA 7 $550.00 7 $3,850.00 7 $3,850.00 CaNST SANITARY MH (0'-10') EA 9 $1,350.00 3 $4,050.00 7 $9,450.00 EROSION CONTROL LS 1 $2,500.00 0.2 $500.00 0.2 $500.00 GR.ANULAR BORROW FROM STOCKPILE (LV) Cy 6360 $3.25 1250 $4,062.50 1650 $5,362.50 INSTALL PRIVATE UTILITY CONDUIT LF 4450 $4.00 3720 $14,880.00 3720 $14,880.00 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $51,021.57 0.5 $25,510.79 0.7 $35,715.10 PILE TIP PROTECTION 12" EA 24 $31.91 24 $765.84 24 $765.84 REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPOXY COATED)(P) LB 135430 $0.67 0 $0.00 4043 $2,708.81 REMOVE STORM SEWER LF 400 $7.00 366.5 $2,565.50 'Joe;::, ~~ :),(34~) :: C) ROCK EXC (EV) Cy 2735 $29.00 1535.16 $44,519.64 1631 .5 $47,313.50 Page 2 of 5 ITEM SANITARY LIFT STATION Sl-\NITARY MH OVERDEPTH (>10') SPIRAL REINFORCEMENT BARS (EPOXY COATED)(P) STEEL H-PILING DELIVERED 12" STEEL H-PILING DRIVEN 12" STEEL H-TEST PILE 30' LONG 12" STRUCTURALCONC(3X4~ STRUCTURAL CONC (3Y 43)(P) STRUCTURE EXC TRAFFIC CONTROL \NM FITTINGS Subtotal ... ORIGINAL BID I COl\'lPLETED I This Period II Tn Date I I UnitcJ I Quantit), II Unit Price II I Quantit)' II Amount II Quantity II Amount I LS 1 $83,500.00 0.75 $62,625.00 0.75 $62,625.00 LF 55 $123.00 22.49 $2,766.27 38.84 $4,777.32 LB 2480 $2.78 0 $0.00 1860 $5,170.80 LF 800 $11.63 262 $3,047.06 262 $3,047.06 LF 800 $1.15 218 $250.70 218 $250.70 EA 2 $4,033.75 2 $8,067.50 2 $8,067.50 Cy 86 $170.61 33.1 $5,647.19 57 $9,724.77 Cy 269 $373.54 6.8 $2,540.07 6.8 $2,540.07 LS 1 $2,267.20 0.5 $1,133.60 0.5 $1,133.60 LS 1 $4,800.00 0.2 $960.00 0.4 $1,920.00 LBS 11875 $2.50 4435 $11,087.50 7470 $18,675.00 $499,45940 $638,415.94 Page 3 of 5 , CITY OF HASTINGS General Sieben Drive Extension & Payment Summary 5/1/2003 through 5/31/2003 PROJECTS: I This Period II Total To Date I 2003-6 General Sieben Drive Extension & Bridge $499,459.40 $638,415.94 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED TO DATE: $499,459.40 $638,415.94 Page 4 of 5 I, .' <. City of Hastings 2003-6 General Sieben Drive Extension & Bridge Application for Payment Number 2 Period Ending: 5/31/2003 Contractor: A-1 Excavating, Inc. P.O. Box 90 Bloomer, WI 55068 Approved by PAYMENT SUMMARY: 1 TOTALS TO DATE: Contractor ~.~ Engineer .~. ---. Owner Pay Est. # -- -- - --- --n_-- 1 2 L-z "'7'.:..-. - / Period 4/15/2003 - 4/26/2003 5/1/2003 - 5/31/2003 Date c l/ð/'ó:J Date Date Retainage $0.00 $0.00 I $0.00 Total Completed to Date: Less Retainage: $638,415.94 $0.00 Less Previous Payment: Total Amount Due: $138,956.54 $499,459.40 Pa yment $138,956.54 $499,459.40 $638,415.94 J Page 5 of 5 Pay Request #8 Dated June 9, 2003 02-2 18th st reconstrution Item Unit Unit Price Partial Estimate Total SAP 130-127-05 Quantity May,2003 Pay Request Clearing Tree 3000.00 0.00 $0.00 Grubbing Tree 2750.00 0.00 $0.00 Remove Sewer Pipe LF 8.00 0.00 $0.00 Remove Concrete curb and gutter LF 3.00 0.00 $0.00 Remove Bit Curb LF 1.00 0.00 $0.00 Remove Concrete sidewalk SY 10.00 0.00 $0.00 Remove concrete drwy pavement sy 1.50 0.00 $0.00 Remove bit pavement sy 1.50 0.00 $0.00 Remove catch basin Imanhole Each 300.00 0.00 $0.00 Common excavation cy 6.00 0.00 $O.O() Subgrade excavation cy 5.00 0.00 $0.00 Granular borrow-Iv cy 5.80 0.00 $0.00 Topsoil borrow-Iv cy 8.00 0.00 $0.00 Salvaged Aaa from stockpile-millinas- cy 4.50 0.00 $0.00 Salvaged topsoil from stockpile cy 2.00 0.00 $0.00 Salvaged topsoil -ev cy 4.50 0.00 $0.00 Agg Base CI-5 ton 6.95 0.00 $0.00 Mill Bit Surface SY 1.50 0.00 $0.00 Type mv4 mix-wear course ton 30.00 0.00 $0.00 Type mv3 non-wear course mix ton 26.50 0.00 $0.00 Irregular width paving sy 10.30 0.00 $0.00 Bituminous material for tack coat gal 1.75 0.00 $0.00 Connect to exist storm Each 325.00 0.00 $0.00 Adjust gate valve box Each 75.00 0.00 $0.00 Adjust curb box Each 110.00 0.00 $0.00 l' gate valve box sect. Over curb box Each 76.00 0.00 $0.00 Adjust frame & rino casting Each 225.00 0.00 $0.00 Connect to exist mh or cb Each 750.00 0.00 $0.00 4 U concrete walk sf 2.70 0.00 $0.00 Concrete curb & gutter b618 LF 7.10 0.00 $0.00 68 concrete drwy pavement sy 31.00 0.00 $0.00 Xsplant tree 2-68 CAL Decid. Tree 300.00 0.00 $0.00 c::::: - I CO i' I' r " I 1 Tree Protection Each 100.00 0.00 $0.00 Root barrier LF 20.00 0.00 $0.00 Inlet protection Each 50.00 0.00 $0.00 Sodding type lawn sy 2.50 0.00 $0.00 Modular Block Retaining Wall SF 25.30 0.00 $0.00 1211 rc pipe sewer des 3006 III LF 21.00 0.00 $0.00 15" rc pipe sewer des 3006 III LF 24.10 0.00 $0.00 1811 rc pipe sewer des 3006 III LF 26.86 0.00 $0.00 2411RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 CL III LF 29.00 0.00 $0.00 54 II RC Pipe Sewer Des 3006 CL III LF 109.85 4.00 $439.40 Construct drainage structure des 48"-~ Each 1180.00 0.00 $0.00 Construct drainage structure des 108" Each 8478.00 0.00 $0.00 Sprinkler Repair LS 1008.86 0.00 $0.00 construct drainage structure des 24 x Each 746.00 0.00 $0.00 Total May,2003 18th reconstruct SAP $439.40 02-2 18th St. Remove curb stop & box ea 50.00 0.00 $0.00 Non-participating Remove mh-san sew ea 300.00 0.00 $0.00 May 2003 Pay Request Salvage CI pipe If 5.00 0.00 $0.00 Salvage gate valve ea 200.00 13.00 $2,600.00 Salvage hydrant & valve ea 300.00 0.00 $0.00 Connect to ex san sew ea 350.00 0.00 $0.00 Reconnect san sew services ea 135.00 0.00 $0.00 811 X 4" pvc wye ea 25.30 0.00 $0.00 411 pvc sdr 26 If 10.80 128.00 $1,382.40 811 outside drop If 195.00 0.00 $0.00 811 DIP CL-52 0-1 Oldepth If 56.00 0.00 $0.00 8" pvc sdr 35 10-121 depth If 49.00 56.00 $2,744.00 8" pvc sdr 35 12-141 depth If 54.00 20.00 $1,080.00 8" pvc sdr 35 14-161 depth If 54.00 196.00 $10,584.00 811 pvc sdr 3516-181 depth If 64.00 61.00 $3,904.00 connect to ex wm ea 369.00 10.00 $3,690.00 reconnect water service ea 216.00 0.00 $0.00 hydrant 81 bury ea 2380.00 0.00 $0.00 3/4" corp stop ea 26.00 0.00 $0.00 81'av ea 704.00 0.00 $0.00 "1 6" gv ea 501.00 14.00 $7,014.00 3/4" curb stop box ea 56.00 0.00 $0.00 3/4'. type "KIt coper pipe If 9.15 0.00 $0.00 611 wm ductile iron cl-52 If 18.10 262.50 $4,751.25 au wm ductile iron cl-52 If 20.50 101.00 $2,070.50 construct san mh ea 2727.00 0.00 $0.00 extra depth mh over 0-10. depth If 82.00 0.00 $0.00 rock excavation cy 21.00 0.00 $0.00 Tota; May 200318th St. non-participating $39,820.15 02-3 21st & Eddy May, 2003 Pay Request Clearing Tree 3000.00 0.00 $0.00 Grubbing Tree 2750.00 0.00 $0.00 Remove bit. Curb LF 1.00 0.00 $0.00 Remove Conc Sidewalk SY 10.00 0.00 $0.00 remove concrete drway pavement SY 1.50 0.00 $0.00 remove bit pavement SY 1.50 0.00 $0.00 remove curb stop & box Each 50.00 0.00 $0.00 remove drainage structure Each 500.00 0.00 $0.00 salvage cl pipe LF 5.00 0.00 $0.00 Remove MH(San Sew) Each 300.00 0.00 $0.00 salvage gate valve Each 200.00 0.00 $0.00 salvage hydrant & valve Each 300.00 0.00 $0.00 common excavation CY 6.00 0.00 $0.00 Rock Exc(Hammering) CY 21.00 325.70 $6,839.70 granular borrow CY 5.80 0.00 $0.00 a regate base cl 5 ton 6.95 0.00 $0.00 topsoil borrow CY 8.00 0.00 $0.00 Mill Bit Surf SY 1.50 0.00 $0.00 salvaged random rip rap. CY 35.00 0.00 $0.00 aggregate base cl 5 ton 6.95 0.00 $0.00 type mv4 mixture wear course ton 30.00 0.00 $0.00 type mv3 non wear course mix ton 26.50 0.00 $0.00 Irregular width paving SY 10.30 0.00 $0.00 Bit Material for tack coat Gal 1.75 0.00 $0.00 Rec San Sew Services Each 135.00 0.00 $0.00 .... 12" rc pipe sewer des 3006 clill LF 21.00 0.00 $0.00 15" rc pipe sewer des 3006 clill LF 24.10 0.00 $0.00 1811 rc pipe sewer des 3006 clill LF 26.86 0.00 $0.00 connect to ex mh Each 1052.50 0.00 $0.00 reconnect san sew srvc Each 135.00 0.00 $0.00 8x4 PVC Wye Each 25.30 0.00 $0.00 4" PVC Sdr 26 LF 10.80 32.00 $345.60 6" pvc sdr 35 0-10" depth LF 13.70 0.00 $0.00 8" PVC SDR 3510-12 LF 49.00 0.00 $0.00 8U PVC SDR 35 12-14 LF 54.00 166.00 $8,964.00 8" pvc sde 35 14-161 depth LF 54.00 295.00 $15,930.00 hydrant 7' 6" bury Each 2357.00 0.00 $0.00 8" outside drop LF 195.00 0.00 $0.00 connect to ex wm Each 369.00 6.00 $2,214.00 Reconn Water Serv Each 216.00 0.00 $0.00 8u dip cl 52 0-101 depth LF 56.00 150.00 $8,400.00 3/411 Corp Stop Each 26.00 0.00 $0.00 1 .5" Corp Stop Each 89.00 0.00 $0.00 6" gate valve Each 501.00 1.00 $501.00 111 GV box section over curb box Each 76.00 0.00 $0.00 4" concrete walk sf 2.70 0.00 $0.00 concrete curb and gutter b618 LF 7.10 0.00 $0.00 cone curb & gutter d418 mod. LF 12.00 0.00 $0.00 6" cone drwy pavement sy 31.00 0.00 $0.00 Deciduous Tree 2U CAL B&B Tree 325.00 0.00 $0.00 3/4" curb stop box Each 56.00 0.00 $0.00 1 .5" curb stop and box Each 105.50 0.00 $0.00 adjust curb box Each 110.00 0.00 $0.00 1.5" type k copper pipe LF 12.50 0.00 $0.00 3/4" type "K" copper pipe LF 9.15 0.00 $0.00 6" wm ductile iron cl -52 LF 18.10 51.00 $923.10 construct drainage structure 48" 402C Each 1180.00 1.00 $1,180.00 Const San Mh Each 2727.00 0.00 $0.00 const drainage structure 24" x 36" Each 746.00 0.00 $0.00 xtra depth mh over 0-10" depth LF 82.00 9.00 $738.00 Tree Prot Each 100.00 0.00 $0.00 Lower Water Serv LF 15.35 0.00 $0.00 -1 1811FES Each 613.63 0.00 $0.00 outfall structure Each 20500.00 0.00 $0.00 1811 flapgate Each 3400.00 0.00 $0.00 cl-5 rip rap ton 31.50 0.00 $0.00 Sodding type lawn sy 2.50 0.00 $0.00 Lower Ex 611 watermain (incl611 DIP) LF 78.40 0.00 $0.00 Const Drainage Structure 5.51 Diam. Each 2306.00 1.00 $2,306.00 Total May,2003 21 st& Eddy $48,341.40 02-4 19th ST May,2003 Pay Request Clearing Tree 3000.00 0.00 $0.00 Grubbing Tree 2750.00 0.00 $0.00 remove dewer pipe (storm) LF 8.00 0.00 $0.00 remove conc drwy pavement sy 1.50 0.00 $0.00 remove bit pavement sy 1.50 0.00 $0.00 salvage cl pipe LF 5.00 0.00 $0.00 common excavation cy 6.00 0.00 $0.00 topsoil borrow (Iv) cy 8.00 0.00 $0.00 agg base cl 5 ton 6.95 0.00 $0.00 type mv4 mix wear course ton 30.00 0.00 $0.00 type mv3 non wearing course mix ton 26.50 0.00 $0.00 irreg width paving sy 10.30 0.00 $0.00 bituminous material for tack coat gal 1.75 0.00 $0.00 concret curb and gutter b618 LF 7.10 0.00 $0.00 611 conc drwy pavement sy 31.00 0.00 $0.00 deciduous tree 211 CAL B&B Tree 325.00 0.00 $0.00 Rem Bit Curb LF 1.00 0.00 $0.00 Mill Bit Surf SY 1.50 0.00 $0.00 Tree Prot Each 100.00 0.00 $0.00 remove manhole (san sew) Each 300.00 0.00 $0.00 remove cb or mh Each 300.00 0.00 $0.00 salvage gate valve Each 200.00 0.00 $0.00 rock excavation (hammering) cy 21.00 22.20 $466.20 1211 rc pipe sewer des 3006 cl III LF 21.00 0.00 $0.00 1811 rc pipe sewer des 3006 cllll LF 26.86 0.00 $0.00 2411 rc pipe sewer des 3006 cllll LF 29.00 0.00 $0.00 -1 30" rc pipe sewer des 3006 clill LF 43.60 0.00 $0.00 connect to existing san sew Each 350.00 0.00 $0.00 reconnect san sew srvcs Each 135.00 0.00 $0.00 811 X 4" pvc wye Each 25.30 0.00 $0.00 411 sdr 26 LF 10.80 0.00 $0.00 fill & abandon vc pipe sewer LF 1.25 0.00 $0.00 8" pvc sdr 35 0-101 depth LF 49.00 0.00 $0.00 8" pvc sdr 35 10-12' depth LF 49.00 0.00 $0.00 8" pvc sdr 3512-14' depth LF 54.00 0.00 $0.00 connect to existing wm Each 369.00 0.00 $0.00 reconnect water service Each 216.00 0.00 $0.00 hydrant 7-6" bury Each 2357.00 0.00 $0.00 hydrant 81 bury Each 2380.00 0.00 $0.00 3/411 corp stop Each 26.00 0.00 $0.00 6" gate valve Each 501.00 0.00 $0.00 lower ex 6" wm (incl 6" dip) LF 78.40 0.00 $0.00 6" wm ductile iron cl 52 LF 18.10 0.00 $0.00 const drainage sturcture des 48" 4020 Each 1180.00 0.00 $0.00 const drainage structure des 60" 4020 Each 2132.00 0.00 $0.00 const drainage structure des 8411 4020 Each 3385.00 0.00 $0.00 const drainage structure des 24x3611 Each 746.00 0.00 $0.00 const san mh Each 2727.00 0.00 $0.00 xtra depth mh over 0-1 01 depth LF 82.00 0.00 $0.00 sodding type lawn sy 2.50 0.00 $0.00 modular block retaining wall sf 25.30 0.00 $0.00 3/411 type UKII copper pipe LF 9.15 61.00 $558.15 . Total May,2003 19th 5t 0.00 $1 ,024.35 02-5 Ashland May 2003 Pay Req. Remove Bit Curb LF 1.00 0.00 $0.00 remove sewer pipe - storm LF 8.00 0.00 $0.00 remove conc drwy pavement Sy 1.50 0.00 $0.00 common excavation (p) cy 6.00 0.00 $0.00 topsoil borrow (Iv) cy 8.00 0.00 $0.00 remove bit pavement Sy 1.50 0.00 $0.00 - remove drainage structure Ea 500.00 0.00 $0.00 remove mh-san sew Ea 300.00 0.00 $0.00 remove catch basin or mh Ea 300.00 0.00 $0.00 salvage cl pipe LF 5.00 0.00 $0.00 salvage gate valve Ea 200.00 0.00 $0.00 salvage hydrant and valve Ea 300.00 0.00 $0.00 rock excavation (hammering) cy 21.00 0.00 $0.00 i granular borrow (Iv) cy 5.80 0.00 $0.00 salvaged agg from stockpile millings cy 4.50 0.00 $0.00 agg base cl 5 ton 6.95 0.00 $0.00 Clearing Tree 3000.00 0.00 $0.00 Grubbing Tree 2750.00 0.00 $0.00 bituminous material for tack coat gal 1.75 0.00 $0.00 Mill Bit Surface SY 1.50 0.00 $0.00 type mv4 mix wear course ton 30.00 0.00 $0.00 type mv3 non wear course ton 26.50 0.00 $0.00 irregular width paving SY 10.30 0.00 $0.00 concrete outlet structure (incl rebar) Ea 20500.00 0.00 $0.00 flap gate for 42" rc pipe Ea 4100.00 0.00 $0.00 1211 rc pipe sewer des 3006 cl III LF 21.00 0.00 $0.00 4211 rc pipe sewer des 3006 cl III LF 70.75 0.00 $0.00 connect to ex mh (san) Ea 1052.50 0.00 $0.00 reconnect san sew services Ea 135.00 0.00 $0.00 8" X 411 pvc wye Ea 25.30 0.00 $0.00 411 pvc sdr 26 LF 10.80 126.00 $1,360.80 811 pvc sdr 35 0-10' depth LF 49.00 0.00 $0.00 811 pvc sdr 35 101-121 depth LF 49.00 0.00 $0.00 811 pvc sdr 35 121-141 depth LF 54.00 16.00 $864.00 connect to existing wm Ea 369.00 0.00 $0.00 hydrant 7-611 bury Ea 2357.00 0.00 $0.00 concrete curb & gutter b618 LF 7.10 0.00 $0.00 611 drwy pavement SY 31.00 0.00 $0.00 Deciduous tree211 GAL B&B Tree 325.00 0.00 $0.00 sodding type lawn SY 2.50 0.00 $0.00 611gv Ea 501.00 0.00 $0.00 6" hyd ext Ea 350.00 0.00 $0.00 lower water service LF 15.35 36.00 $552.60 -; 111 type k copper pipe LF 11.50 0.00 $0.00 6" wm ductile iron cl-52 LF 18.10 38.00 $687.80 lower ex 12" wm (incI12" dip) LF 127.00 0.00 $0.00 const drainage structure des 66" 402( Ea 2306.00 0.00 $0.00 const drainage structure des 24 x36" Ea 746.00 0.00 $0.00 construct san mh Ea 2727.00 0.00 $0.00 ramdom rip rap cl 5 ton 31.50 0.00 $0.00 inlet protection Ea 50.00 0.00 $0.00 lower 6" wm LF 78.40 0.00 $0.00 Tree Protection Ea 100.00 0.00 $0.00 Traffic Control LS 19830.00 0.00 $0.00 Extra depth MH Over 0-101 depth LF 82.00 10.00 $820.00 Total May 2003 Ashland $4,285.20 02-6 Southview May,2003 Pay Req Clearing (1) Acre 5000.00 0.00 $0.00 Grubbing(1) Acre 5000.00 0.00 $0.00 Rem Sew Pipe (storm) LF 8.00 0.00 $0.00 Rem C&G LF 3.00 0.00 $0.00 Rem Conc Dwy Pavement SY 1.50 0.00 $0.00 Rem CB or Mh Each 300.00 0.00 $0.00 Salv CI Pipe LF 5.00 0.00 $0.00 salv Wooden Fence LF 30.00 0.00 $0.00 Salv Hyd & Valve Each 300.00 0.00 $0.00 Comm Ex (P) CY 6.00 0.00 $0.00 Subg Excv CY 5.00 0.00 $0.00 topsoil borrow-Iv CY 8.00 0.00 $0.00 A Base CL 5 Ton 6.95 .0.00 $0.00 type mv3 non wear course mix Ton 26.50 0.00 $0.00 Itype mv4 mix wear course Ton 30.00 0.00 $0.00 type Iv4 bit wear course Ivwe45030b tl Ton 35.00 0.00 $0.00 type Iv3 bit wear course Ivwe35030b tl Ton 30.50 0.00 $0.00 bit material for tack coat ¡gal 1.75 0.00 $0.00 Mill Bit Surf SY 1.50 0.00 $0.00 18" RC pipe apron w trashgrd Each 613.63 0.00 $0.00 30" RC pipe apron w trashgrd Each 1212.48 0.00 $0.00 -! 12" RC Pipe Sew des 3006 clV LF 21.00 0.00 $0.00 15" 18 LF 22.10 0.00 $0.00 1818 II LF 24.86 0.00 $0.00 3011 II LF 43.60 0.00 $0.00 reconn San sew serv Each 135.00 0.00 $0.00 Conn to Ex MH (san) Each 1052.50 0.00 $0.00 10x4 PVC Wye Each 79.15 0.00 $0.00 41' Pvc Sdr 26 San serv pipe LF 10.80 12.00 $129.60 10'1 pvc sdr 34 10-12 LF 50.25 0.00 $0.00 II 12-14 LF 55.25 0.00 $0.00 18 14-16 LF 55.25 0.00 $0.00 II 16-18 LF 65.25 0.00 $0.00 18 18-20 LF 75.25 61.00 $4,590.25 411 insulation board SY 15.15 0.00 $0.00 hyd 81 bury Each 2380.00 0.00 $0.00 611 gate valve Each 501.00 0.00 $0.00 const drain structure 4818 EAch 1180.00 0.00 $0.00 II 5411 Each 1392.00 0.00 $0.00 II 6011 Each 2132.00 0.00 $0.00 const drain structure 24x36 Each 746.00 0.00 $0.00 random rip rap Ton 31.50 0.00 $0.00 concrete c & g b618 LF 7.10 0.00 $0.00 611 concrete drwy pavement SY 31.00 0.00 $0.00 R1642 Casting Assembly Each 350.00 0.00 $0.00 Salv A from stockpile (mill) (Iv) CY 4.50 0.00 $0.00 41' dbl side yellow line w/epoxy beads LF 0.00 350.00 $0.00 Adjust GV Box Each 75.00 0.00 $0.00 Adjust frame ring and casting Each 225.00 0.00 $0.00 Conn to Ex WM Each 369.00 0.00 $0.00 111 Curb Stop & box Each 67.50 0.00 $0.00 111 type k copper pipe LF 11.50 0.00 $0.00 11' corp stop Each 33.50 0.00 $0.00 Lower 818 wm LF 115.00 0.00 $0.00 6" Dip CI52 LF 18.10 0.00 $0.00 8" dip CI 52 LF 20.50 0.00 $0.00 inlet protection Each 50.00 0.00 $0.00 6" hvd extension Each 350.00 0.00 $0.00 ., sod SY 2.50 0.00 $0.00 Sprinkler Repair LS 2760.99 0.00 $0.00 Erosion Control LS 2500.00 0.00 $0.00 deciduos tree 211 CAL B&B tree 325.00 0.00 $0.00 02-6 Southview Pay req $4,719.85 Total Work This Pay Estimate $98,630.35 5% Retainaae of Work over 50% $4,931.52 Total Earned Less Retainage $93,698.83 Amount of Pay Estimate #1 $367,777.40 Amount of Pay Estimate #2 $281,730.55 Amount of Pay Estimate #3 $441,101.96 Amount of Pay Estimate #4 $536,757.19 Amount of Pay Estimate #5 $448,235.18 Amount of Pay Estimate #6 $243,446.68 Amount of Pay Estimate #7 $29,391.10 Amount of Pay Estimate #8 $93,698.83 Total Payments to Date $2,535,837.72 Total Payable for Pay Estimate #8 $93,698.83 3 Rivers Construction Signature Date ..~,~ -"" -- "" /. " ,- ~~ --/ "'//¿;/è~ City of Hastings / Engineer,Si'Qnature Date m:\construction projects\2003\Pav reQuest\Mav 2003 Jun.10. 2003 11:~5AM -!fñ ~~ PEMBER EXCAVATING VI-9 Pember Excavating, Inc. No./oLI p. 1/1 - Grading. Utility In.stallation . Curb and Gutter. Sidewalk Phone: 715-235-0316 FAX: 715-235-9006 'vW{W. pem berexcavati ng.com CITY OF HASTINGS Engineering Dept.-Attn: S. Schmidtke 101 4th Street Hastings, MN 55033 Pay Request # 02-555-4 Re: Hastings, 2002 Trail Improvements UNIT PRICE TOTAL STORED BID NO. BID UNITS QUAN. BID DESCRIPTION 10 MOBILIZATION LS 1.00 4,500.00 20 REMOVE C & G LF 70.00 5.00 30 COMMON EXCAVATION CY 1,500.00 8.05 40 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY 50.00 11.75 50 TOPSOIL BORROW CY 175.00 14.00 60 GRANULAR BORROW CY 2,150.00 3.25 70 AGG BASE CLASS 2 (DRIVEWAY) TON 45.00 6.85 80 AGG BASE CLASS 5 (TRAIL) CY 520.00 12.75 90 BIT MAT FOR TACK COAT GAL 215.00 2..00 100 TYPE LV4 BIT WEAR CRS (TRAIL) TON 390.00 36.40 110 TYPE LV3 BIT BASE CRS (TRAIL) TON 390.00 38.40 120 15 IN RC PIPE APRW/TRASHGUAR EA 4.00 850.00 130 15 IN RC PIPE SWR DES 3006 CL V LF 120.00 35.00 140 CaNST DRAINAGE STRUC DES 5-1 EA 2:00 1.650.00 150 RANDOM RIP RAP CLASS III CU' 13.00 60.00 160 8618 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 70.00' 25.00 170 GIN CONC PAVE (DRWJ & PED RM SY 35.00 41.00 180 CHAIN LINK FENCE LF 1,000.00 13.78 180'" Costs Incurred with demobiliatian and restocking materials fee (see attached) 190 WOOD.EN BOLLARDS EA 40.00 102.00 200 SILT FENCE LF 1,700.00 1.50 210 SEED, MULCH, & FERT ACRE 1.00 1,225.00 add REM CONC APRON/SIDEWALKS SY 6.30 Ext(as See Attached Worksheet LS 1.00 1,438.13 1,438.13 N 4449 - 469rh St. Menomonie, Wisconsin 54751 6-Jun-O3 Fax: 651-437-7082 QUAN. COMPL. 1.00 44.00 1,500.00 50.00 175.00 1,727.77,* 45.46 942.23 391.02 6.00 144.00 2.00 60.00 44.00 21.05 41.00 1,941.00 2.94 15.55 1.00 TOTAL WORK COMPLETED: LESS PAYMENT #1 : City paid for 63Öcy granular borrow @3.25 LESS PAYMENT #2: '. in Nov. 200.2. This balance due represents the LESS PAYMENT #3: agrèed u n increase granular borrow 1o_97.77 X 13. 25/cy= I ~ Rosemary Web... Contract Admin rater Equal Opportunity Employer - r 4,500.00 220.00 12,075.00 587.50 2,450.00 5,615.25 311 .40 12,013.43 15,245.57 5,100.00 5,040.00 3.300.00 3.600.00 1.100.00 863.05 2,757.89 4.182.00 2,911.50 3,601.50 97.97 87.010.19 77.568.17 3,116.38 2.757.89 $3,567.75 f VI-10 MEMO TO: FROM: RE: DATE: Honorable Mayor and City Council members Lori A. Webster, Finance Director 2003 Budget adjustments June 11, 2003 The City Council is asked to authorize the following budget adjustment request received by the Police department: $ 100.00 adjustment to DARE donations (101-201-2013-5815) and the Misc Exp account (101-201-2013-6450) for the expenditure of these funds. $ 559.30 adjustment to Restitution account (101-201-2010-5520) and corresponding expenditure account (101201-2010-6354) for repair costs to squad. $180.00 adjustment to Revenue (101-201-2010-5416) and Expenditures (101- 201-2012-6450) for Crime Watch - multi- housing class and cover related expenses. $25.00 adjustment to DARE Donations (101-201-2013-5815) and related DARE expenditure account (101-201-2013-6450) As always, should you have any questions on this information, please feel free to contact me. Council Action Requested Authorize the above 2003 budget adjustments and as indicated. -- r VI-11 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION HA:~1~NG:5, .M.\NNE50T/\ 550:):) May 29, 2003 CITY OF HASTINGS 101 4TH STREET EAST HASTINGS, MN 55033 Dear City Council Members and Mayor Mike Werner, The Downtown Business Association and Main Street Festival committee requests the closing of two blocks on East Second Street on September 20th from 7:00AM to 5:00pm for a craft show, flea market and farmer's market during Main Street Festival. The area being requested is the first and second block between the bridge and Ramsey Street. The cross streets would remain open to traffic and parking. Please direct any questions or comments to: Pam Holzem 114 East Second Street Hastings, Mn 55033 651-480-3562 Home 651-437-5000 ext 15 Star Realty P AMHOLZEM@YAHOO.COM Sinc~~~ The Main Street Festiva~ Committee -. r VI-12 MEMO TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Marty McNamara SUBJECT: Wallin Park Hockey Rink DATE: June 11, 2003 REQUEST COUNCIL ACTION Authorize Staff to advertise for the construction of a lighted hockey rink for Wallin Park. The proposed rink will be permanent, but have no bituminous surface. The City Council in the 2003 budget designated $100,000 for the construction of the rink. -,- .Il_- VI-13 To: From: Date: Re: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk June 11, 2003 Annual Renewal of 2003/2004 Liquor Licenses On Sale, Sunday On Sale, Off Sale, Club & 3.2 Beer RECOMMENDED CllY COUNCIL AcrION: Approve the list of all liquor-related licenses (attached), due for renewal on July 1, 2003, some contingent upon receipt of necessary insurance paperwork. Following Council approval and final paperwork (as needed), the renewal paperwork will then be forwarded to the Minnesota Liquor Commissioner for final review and approval. Renewal notices were sent out, and with some minor exceptions, our currently-licensed establishments have returned their paperwork to the City in full and are ready for a renewal of their liquor license. There are a few establishments that are missing an item or two; they have been notified and this approval is contingent upon receipt of all necessary paperwork. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thank you. - r .. .. : : .. : .. : : : .. .. : : : .. : .... ......" : : ::: : : : : : : : : : : : : : M'~~~hi~ : """"""""""" ' : : : : : : : : : : : : : " : : : : : : : : : " " : : : : : : : : : : ................ : : : : : : ::::::::::::::::::::::: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ........"..,. I~ ~e.ÇC¡Ve.df: "l" rm.$fþJQ : : N~)ti~ Qf ~:$1i.~:Þn €311 mcn~: : : : :1\1 r : : :1\d.dltJÞh?I :I n.:Q h ... ." : :::: : : : : ::: . .. .... ... .. ..".."...... ... .,........ . .. .. . ... . .' .......... ........ ....... .....' "........ Am ~rica n L~g ion Y~ø Appl~b~~' s Y~s Bi~rstu b~ Y~6 ~R#2 UIS?JIÝ~:~:~:~:~:~: ~II:~. r::~:~:::~:) ¡} ~I:~. [II:~: [.~:~.~:) ¡.~. [: [III :::::::::'::"::::':':"":"".':,":;""0"::;:-":'::':""'r:::""'6;$.::::::::: ~:~.::~::.~.::~:~: ¡::.:: ¡: ¡. ¡::. ¡: ¡: ¡: ¡. ¡: H t- ¡I: ¡: ¡I: ¡If: ¡! if: ¡I: ¡: ¡!~: ¡: ¡! ¡: ¡: ¡: ¡. ¡: ¡. ¡: ¡! ¡: ¡: ¡:~: ¡: ¡! ¡.:: ¡! H ¡: ¡t.:. ¡: ¡! ¡: ¡':::.:::: ¡: ¡t1::: ¡: ¡: ¡: ¡! ¡: ¡:::~! ¡: ¡: ¡! ¡: ¡! ~t! ¡!~: ¡! ¡! ¡!~! ¡!¡ :,:".:-CÞOB.ED.ffi. ¡<).:f>U$. NE... ...;.:.:.: ::.::::::.:.:.:...:.:..:.:.:..:::.:...:..::::::'.:::::.:':,:,,'::::.::.....:::..:::.....::.:..::.:.....:......::......::::::::: DuGa r~I'ø Y~s Eag I~s Y~s Co lia~u m Y~6 Hasti ng6 Co u ntry CI u b Y~s Ho us~ of Wi n ~s Y~s Kn Ig hts of Col um bus Y~s Lion6 Y~ø Liq uo r Lock~r Y~s MG M Liquors Ye6 M i66i66ippi Bel Ie Ye6 01 ' ' Grove Ye6 Ivera Papa Cha rrito' s Yes Pizza H ut Yes R~g i na M~d ica I C~nt~r Y~6 Rivers Grl II & Ba r Yea Rivertown Li~.uo rø Ye6 ,.,........,.......,......,.........,.....""...,...,........,....,...."... :1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 !lllil1~11'¡IiÎiIIRII~IIII¡lill ...,~,.,.,.....,."..........,......."..,......,.....,...,...,.....,.'.',..'..,'..,'...'.....','..,',','..,'.'..........,'..,','","', " " ""..............".",.,.."..",................,.....""""" .., .. . .........................................,...................,... 1!11¡¡¡'¡¡i¡¡¡¡'¡:¡~:IIIII'I¡lilll:III:IIIIII¡i:!:I¡:::::\,¡IIII:I:¡¡¡¡¡i¡:¡:¡![¡¡I:l"I¡I'¡:¡¡I:lil¡¡¡¡'¡l¡:li¡I\!:ill¡':!'¡li¡¡:¡¡¡I:¡¡:l¡:\:¡::!: S h ort Stop Yes S u n Moon Buff~t Yes S uper America Yes fa ma lea Yes Th ~ Ba r Yes .....,............"....,.....,.,....""... ... "...........,............. ,..........".....,." .....,'...."'" ,.............., ..... IIIttJI1:4tiflili IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII¡III\IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII :1111111111111[111111'11111111111111111111111111111111III Th ~ R~d Feath er Yes Applying fo r fu I I, 0 n -sa Ie liCi1uor I icens~ Verm illion Bottl~ S h op Yes VFW Yes W~stvi~w L iCi1.uoro Y~ø r VI-14 10: From: Date: Re: Mayor Werner and City Councilmembers Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk June 12, 2003 Approval of Full On-Sale Liquor License at The Red Feather, 118 2nd Street East Approve the issuance of a full, on-sale liquor license at The Red Feather (118 2nd Street East), owned by James & Tracy Murray. ~ Mr. and Mrs. Murray applied for, and were granted, 3.2% on-sale, a Sunday on-sale, a "strong beer" and a wine liquor license at the April 7, 2003 City Council meeting. They are planning on opening June 16, 2003. As you are aware, state law limits the number of full, on-sale liquor licenses a City can issue. This last legislative session, the City applied for, and was granted, the ability to issue three additional licenses above our statutory limit. Additionally, one of the former on-sale license holders has closed for business, thereby making four full, on-sale liquor licenses available for issuance. The Murrays have submitted the additional paperwork for a full on-sale liquor license. Staff is recommending approval of the full, on-sale liquor license for the full license period of July 1, 2003 through June 30, 2004. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to let me know. Attachment6: 1. Resolution Application materials on file - r ----------- - .--.------.-- -'-- - -----.--------.-...-.- CITY OF HASTINGS DAKOTA COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 06- -03 RESOLUTION APPROVING APPLICATION FOR FULL ON-SALE LICENSES TO HAMBONE, INC. D/B/A THE RED FEATHER RESTAURANT WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. James and Tracy Murray (Hambone, Inc.) have presented an application to the City of Hastings for a full on-sale liquor license at The Red Feather Restaurant, 118 East 2nd Street, Hastings, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, The Red Feather has previously been issued a "strong beer" and wine license at this location; and V\JHEREAS, the City of Hastings now has full, on-sale licenses available for issuance; and VVHEREAS, all necessary paperwork has been received and a successful background check has been conducted by the Hastings Police Department. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Hastings that the Mayor and Administrative Assistant/City Clerk are authorized and directed to sign this resolution approving the full, on-sale liquor license at The Red Feather, 118 East 2nd Street to Mr. and Mrs. James and Tracy Murray (Hambone, Inc). ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS THIS 16th DAY OF JUNE, 2003. Ayes: Nays: Absent. Michael D. Werner, Mayor Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk (SEAL) ---- r- _____H____- -------------------------------- VI'-1 MEMO To: From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council Tom Montgomery June 11, 2003 Award Contract - Hwy 61 & 10th St. Intersection Improvements A bid opening is scheduled for Friday, June 13th for the Hwy 61 and 10th St. intersection improvements. A resolution for awarding a contract for this project will be prepared after the bid opening and given to the Council prior to the June 16th Council meeting. .,. . ,:1:,\1" ".{~~A"---'-":'~ :,', Î~ .'~\' ~ .:~¡;;,;;;;:¡. .-¿:~""'::;;:;;¡.:!i,,!1 -, ,~~ -- ~:~<I~~~))' ,.,. ':""~' ~- ~ '. ,': -- _7 --' '~ ,~~fH --"'è~' . h~, - ern" OF 1lASTlN6S -- T MEMO To: From: Date: Re: Honorable Mayor and City Council T om Montgomery June 16,2003 Hwy 61 & 10th St. Intersection Improvements The following bids were received on Friday, June 13th for the Hwy 61 and 10th St. intersection improvements: Bidder Pember Excavating, Inc. McNamara Contracting, Inc. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. Engineer's Estimate Amount $173,237.44 $189,566.50 $211,259.60 $144,335.50 The project bids came in almost $30,000 over estimate. The project was to be funded by $72,000 ofMnDOT Municipal Agreement funds with the remainder to come from the City's Municipal State Aid account. STAFF RECOMMENDATION I am recommending that award-of contract be tabled until the June 23rd special Council meeting to provide staff an opportunity to pursue additional MnDOT funding. If additional funding is not available, the higher project cost could be funded with an additional $30,000 from the City's Municipal State Aid account. - cm oF HASTINGS - r VIII-B-1 Memo To: Mayor Werner and City Council From: John Hinzman, Planning Director Date: June 16,2003 Subject: Lawrence Builders - Site Plan Review #2003-28 - 30 Unit Condominium Building - 875 Bahls Drive. REQUEST Lawrence Builders seeks Site Plan Approval to construct a 30 unit condominium building on 1.71 acres located at 875 Bahls Drive. RECOMMENDED ACTION The Planning Commission voted 5-0 (1 abstention) to recommend approval of the Site Plan at the April 14, 2003 meeting, subject to the conditions of the attached resolution. Commissioners discussed green space separation between the site and future office construction to the north. ATTACHMENTS . Resolution . Location Map . Site Plan . Building Elevations . Landscape Plan . Application - r . / Lawrence Condominium Building - 875 Bahls Drive - Site Plan Review City Council Memo - June 16, 2003 Page 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Comprehensive Plan Classification The subject property is guided U-III- Urban Residence (8+ units per acre) in the Hastings Comprehensive Plan. The proposed residential density of 17.5 units per acre is consistent with the plan. Zoning Classification The site is zoned R-4 - High Density Residence. Multiple Family residential structures are a permitted use. Adjacent Zoning and land Use The following land uses abuts the site: Direction Existing Use Zoning Comp Plan North Vacant\Lawrence Offices 0-1 - Gen Office 0 - Office East 30 Unit Condo R-4 - High Density U-III - Res 8+ South Dakota Valley Apts R-4 - High Density U-III - Res 8+ West Bahls Drive Vacant C-4 - Reg Shopping C - Commercial Oak Ridge Asst Living R-4 - High Density U-III - Res 8+ History Valley Manor 2nd Addition was originally platted during the mid 1980's as a six lot subdivision. A 46 unit building was originally proposed for the subject property, with 192 units proposed for the entire site. Three of the planned six buildings have been constructed. Existing Condition The existing site is generally flat and treeless. Existing trees and brush exist along the slope down from Bahls Drive. Proposal A 30 unit condominium building and 3 garages (8, 8, and 14 vehicles) are proposed. The condominium building would be 3 stories and contain 36,229 square feet. Units would be 1-2 bedrooms ranging in size from 700 to 1,100 square feet. - T Lawrence Condominium Building - 875 Bahls Drive - Site Plan Review City Council Memo - June 16, 2003 Page 3 SITE PLAN REVI EW Building Setbacks The condominium building and garages meet the minimum R-4 setback requirements as follows: Setback Front Yard Setback Side Yard Setback Rear Yard Setback Accesso Structure Side & Rear Setback R-4 Re uirement 20 . 19.5 1/2 the buildin 20 5 Access and Circulation Access and circulation is adequate. One entrance will be provided to Bahls Drive. Internal circulation is orderly. Parking The site meets minimum parking requirements. Parking is provided as follows: Site 30 Condo Units All parking areas must be constructed of bituminous surfacing and concrete curb and gutter. Parking Lot Setback The Parking lot meets minimum setback requirements. However staff strongly suggests a larger setback along the north property line. The existing 5 foot setback provides a limited area for planting, and reduces the viability of required shrub plantings. A ten foot setback would significantly increase viability for plantings in the area. Pedestrian Access No new sidewalks or trails are proposed. A sidewalk presently exists along the west side of Bahls Drive. Architectural Elevations Architectural elevations are similar to the newly constructed 30 unit building located south and west of Lyn Way and South Frontage Road. Lap siding would be the predominate exterior material. Brick would be incorporated at the building entrances and quoined. Windows and deck projects break up the exterior façade. - T Lawrence Condominium Building - 875 Bahls Drive - Site Plan Review City Council Memo - June 16, 2003 Page 4 Architectural elevations for t he garages including materials and colors will be submitted at the meeting for Council review. Waste Enclosure A waste enclosure has been identified at the southwest corner of the property. The location of structure appears adequate; however the following information is needed: Architectural elevations for the waste enclosure building including materials and colors will be submitted at the meeting for Council review. Landscape Plan The Landscape plan provides for a variety of plantings adjacent to building and throughout the site. Planting beds have been incorporated into the building design. The following additions are needed to comply with minimum requirements: 1) Shrub plantings are needed directly south of western drive aisle terminus (between the two 8 unit garages) to shield headlight views. Shrubs must be planted at a density great enough to provide for a continuous plant mass. 2) Deciduous trees (minimum 2.0 caliper inches) must be planted along the north property line every 50 feet. The zoning ordinance requires the incorporation of major trees in each landscape element. Lighting Plan Lighting will be incorporated into the site. A preliminary lighting plan has been submitted. The following information is needed to complete the review: 1) A photometric lighting plan showing foot-candle illumination of the parking area must be submitted prior to issuance of the building permit. Illumination must not exceed 0.5 foot-candles and the property line. Signage Signage is not proposed. One monument sign not to exceed 50 square feet is allowed under the zoning district, subject to sign permit approval. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan & Utility Plan The City's consultant engineer has reviewed the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control, and Utility Plan. T he Plans must s till receive a pproval by the Public Works Director including resolution of the following issues: 1) The sanitary service line proposed beneath the 14 stall garage building must be cased. -- r Lawrence Condominium Building - 875 Bahls Drive - Site Plan Review City Council Memo - June 16, 2003 Page 5 2) A drainage and utility easement must be obtained for the portion of the sewer service pipe crossing Lot 5, Valley Manor 2nd Addition that is outside of the platted drainage and utility easement. 3) A second fire hydrant location is needed, subject to approval by the Fire Marshall. u- r HASTINGS CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS APPROVING THE SITE PLAN FOR LAWRENCE BUILDERS FOR A 30 UNIT CONDOMINIUM BUILDING AND GARAGES LOCATED AT 875 BAHLS DRIVE, HASTINGS, MINNESOTA Council member moved its adoption: introduced the following Resolution and WHEREAS, Lawrence Builders, owner of property located at 875 Bahls Drive have requested approval to construct a 3 story, 30 unit condominium building and garages on property legally described as Lot 2, Block 1, VALLEY MANOR 2ND ADDITION, Dakota County, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, on April 14, 2003, review was conducted before the Planning Commission of the City of Hastings, as required by state law, city charter and city ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Site Plan subject to the conditions of the attached resolution. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOL YED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS AS FOLLOWS: That the City Council hereby approves the site plan request of Lawrence Builders to construct a 30 unit condominium building and garages subject to the following conditions: 1) Adherence to the Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Architectural Elevations as presented to the City Council on June 16, 2003. 2) All disturbed areas on this property shall be stabilized with rooting vegetative cover to eliminate erosion problems. .~~- r 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) 9) The disturbed areas of the site shall be maintained to the requirements of the City's property maintenance ordinance. Final approval of the Grading, Drainage, Erosion Control, and Utility Plans by the City of Hastings, including, but not limited to resolution of the following issues: a) The sanitary service line proposed beneath the 14 stall garage building must be cased. b) A drainage and utility easement must be obtained for the portion of the sewer service pipe crossing Lot 5, Valley Manor 2nd Addition that is outside of the platted drainage and utility easement. c) A second fire hydrant location is needed, subject to approval by the Fire Marshall. The applicant shall be liable for any costs involved in consultant review of plans. All rooftop equipment shall be screened by a parapet wall. All waste enclosure areas shall be constructed with materials matching the primary building. Shrub plantings must be planted directly south of west em drive aisle tenninus (between the two 8 unit garages) to shield headlight views. Shrubs must be planted at a density great enough to provide for a continuous plant mass. Deciduous trees (minimum 2.0 caliper inches) must be planted along the north property line every 50 feet. 10) Expansion of the planting area on the north side of the parking lot from 5 feet to 10 feet to increase planting viability. 11) All parking and drive aisle areas shall be constructed to city standards including concrete curb and bituminous surfacing. 12) A photometric lighting plan must be submitted prior to issuance of the building pennit showing foot candle illumination of the property. illumination levels are limited to 0.5 foot candles at the property line as required in the Zoning Code 13) Any monument signs shall be architecturally consistent with the buildings on site and incorporate similar materials into their construction. 14) Submission of an electronic copy of all plan sets (TIF, PDF, or similar fonnat) prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy. -- T 15) Approval is subject to a one year Sunset Clause; if significant progress is not made towards construction of the proposal within one year of City Council approval, the app~oval is null and void. 16) Any uncompleted site work (including landscaping) must be escrowed for prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The escrow amount shall be based upon 125 percent of the developers estimate. Council member vote adopted by moved a second to this resolution and upon being put to a present. Ayes: Nays: Absent: ATTEST: Michael D. Wemer, Mayor Melanie Mesko Lee Administrative Assistant/City Clerk I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and COITect copy of resolution presented to and adopted by the City of Hastings, County of Dakota, Minnesota, on the 16th day of June, 2003, as disclosed by the records of the City of Hastings on file and of record in the office. Melanie Mesko Lee Administrative Assistant/City Clerk ( SEAL) This instrument drafted by: City of Hastings (JWH) 101 4th St. East Hastings, MN 55033 --r "1 , ""'-------.- .. tJÇJÇ}i....:.... .' . , , .. ' ,J~~~~~~::::::~:::::',,~'n. L..n ~ 11 ¡ .,....,..,........,i[ :u...."oo.....-¡ :.. \,::~::: :::::~;::::::::;.~:: 11 ~ i .... .:'.:' i 1">::::::::>" ¡'...'....-¡ :......u..: ,"" ¡'oo.....-- :i : .::::::::::""""" Lawrence Builders 30 Unit Condominium 875 Bahls Drive Legend C) @ 0 0 0 - R-5 R-e City Umits Water COMMERCIAL 0 C-1 48 - - - City Parcel. Township Parcels Co2 Co3 C-4 Zoning NATURAL RESOURCES 0 A - F-W ~ WA RESIDENTIAL 0 R-1 0 C) 0 0-1 WAT INDUSTRIAL 0 1-1 - 1-2 OTHER 0 0 pol ROW R-2 R-3 R-4 N I I ., '. Iv~E -'. .' CITY 01' HIISTlNflS S - Site Location .,~:' ¡J\ \ \ '¡ \ \ I ~ j '! , \ ,¡If, \ .. /'/////" " " ' .. " , ~ \ ' /~;II ".,..' "",,!f;'.1 . "<, , '< -- ,,~WN""-- / ~ " 1/' I ""'......, , ,.ë"",-^"d~ ; :'.1 ;' ¡ .'(-<',"'- .""-'~. /~, ,j I / ;' J '\ \ ' .// // /1/ ;' ..1UtT)">'\ ' ""j" ,,/' / //t; ¡ r: ,,1'1:' \ p; .' I f \ ' , "," / / Ii! ""', \ \ ,/ J;~': J (' ( l ! \ \ / .. '" ~"j! . I I ! " , '\'.. i ,/ , (6 ill," ¡ ¡ ,I \ .. j < / M '4- ¡ : ..., '\]'! f /' I' .) ,2.. j~~ ,,( \ ,-':"- / / " iff j \ r.. \ . ; ~~'- ,f ,'¡ I " .. ¡~<" ., ,!:i!"'¡¡ ~ ¡ I / ' ",,"' .<iT' f ¡ , ! . :..., .".1 ,. ' I / ¡ \ f / i \ . \ ',. / j i ',.,..,.. ~j.~-~,..._--,~...._...,.~..-"..... f .....,' . - ' "".'~'#_' ¡ ! ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ i r,.,..., "~'ff'^--~7¿::"':""~'."""".>-""""""""""""".,m'-~"""'" ~I.. ../'f"" i</'h," "¡;;' \it.". ../ .., f"-> > "..,.' \, \. '!W".::::~ .. -,~~'.." ""... .. t;i, ã#-I". " \ , \. " ¡ -~"99,fjB \ . \ \ 6. /' í \ i ~ wl ø\ < \ 0::\ < / ø / ¡ 0::1 <: Of '. -11"\ OJ ". , i " '\ \ " """"'."--.....,,,. ""'" \, \ 38' , ~ \30 UNIT CONDO /-"""'~"" ~ -"<,.. .".,."., ""."".~.:gl"-, """"1"92L- ff~(. ., <:~ """" w "ø «".., 0:: < ø 24' 0:: « () v ""...1\ ¡ \ I 10',1,\ , \ \ '¡ \ ',.~\>. d W 0:: ::> en 0 ..J u z34' "", 0:: « 0 24' ,..",-.. """'" "" "'" "\ w~' ØW),Jø \ OJ ',,',,- ".. , " , '~J' ¡;;'1~H%i ,..."",""""_""'" """ ¡:;Ü1f.,-".. ,- ~,ff~ fJ1ø;:U;',~j' fk~ itM!/iS , 1~~~ÌBtt2..:~, :',¿ J-, "'I':øW"t¥.~J .t::..:;,~...,f;..".........,....__,_.:h._- .....,., .'-""'---~-""."""""'""'~""'-""""""""ãf;¡!-:7i~:1~..,;;:-" """""""""" ""-,,....,,^_._~,."_WM..,_, ¡ mk'f1¡ ~tl',.)~¡¡ [I ! .. '.w"'.',"""'" "...... ....,'w"'"","""""""""""",,, '....'.,'........'.....~. ..,,-,.. ..-...-. ",',-"'" ,,-,,' ""'" .." -,'-"- ¡¡jiq¡¡$llJ ..' ,y"V""" ..,w"',,',,"'.., "'¡'U{;iW~rt".. ;¡ , t\"/' I '"\ , 1, V' -,," '.:;;~:"':""""""":""""'>""" JO¿ t..1 M¡L.~J ¡ ,i;JL,,:'" ¡ , j , , ' ! ¡ I ¡ I " ... \. " 't' ~wr*B¡r; '\ 't '1 BM:,P 1 ¡ ¡ , \ ì \ \ , ¡ ¡ \ ì \ i. \ \ OIW'HIC BeAU: p......_~ i I. -, ,_.. .. GGG Engineering Surveying Planning I HEREBY CERNY lHAT THIS I'LAN, SPEC!- r1CA1ION. OR REPORT WAS PR£PAJI[) BY lIE 011 UND£R MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND I "II " DillY LICENSED PROfESSIONAL EIIGIHEER UNDER THE LAWS Of THE STATE Dr' IoIIHNESOTA. ... :8 JOHNSON & SCOFIELD INC, LAND SURVEYORS LA TEST REVISION: Prepared Far: Don Lawrence 2-6-2003 CONCEPT PLAN OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1 VAu.£Y MANOR 2ND SUBDIVISION Lawrence Construction and Reali y Hasting".. loin 55033 241 North Winona Street Chatfield. Mn, 55923 Ph. 507-282-2683 DAlE REG. NO.- 1203 MQln Street, Red \v'ing, Mn 55066, 651-388-1558 SHEET OF 1 ' SHEETS FILE NO.: 02088 > \. ---~--~-'^ \ æ , < -'~ u ~ ..... -'l-- ¡o,h:\!HJ9 ., -- GIW'HIC SC.uJ: ~........A.J.-1' T ..-1 ,_.. .. " $' tì1ì~::,tn , \. i'1iHÙ4. \. \ >l.' ... ~-'~f: :t-T,::- - _rAU. M.T "'0", , -- '" ,'" . -... ....... "- . 'uu:"-.. M.T ~~' " - LM, -""C"" ø:ftIIW '-.........- .............- 110 ...... ..... 1M ...' - -, l.~o ':F...."t..&T-". . -- ., ..~ .. u c .. I! ;: .. C O. , Ü ' 2 t; c 0 u if 0 II: BALE - "PITCH ,CHECK \ . . \fI~ {! e I ¡¡¡.~ \\~ .... PREAS SEMBLED SILT' 'FENCE SLOPE CHECK ~ I ...C 2 .----- CGGG Engineering Surveying Planning I HEREBY CERNY 1)IAT TItS PLAN. SPEQ- IlCATKIN. OR REPORT WAS Plt[PARED BY liE DR UNDER \lY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND I All A DUlY UCENSED PROf'ESSlONAl ENGINEER UNDER 1)IE LAWS Of' 1)IE STATE Of' MINNESOTA. 2~1 North Winona Street Chatfield, loin. 55923 Ph, 507-282-2683 DATE REO, NO. - 801 w " (!) -';C(-' æ < .._~"- k~ , "\~ ;~.,11Lc799.5'" ". I:¡N p ~..~.. 0:: 0 0 -I 1L.. .,"-~,...._~".<,,<^;..-.,'- ',.\,-, '30 UNIT CONDO _/,..~.~.,.,.,^-..-",. 1 5T FLOOR ELEV. ... 801 :5"""~~~,.." -..'._~..,....--._. -»-t\1}"" .. "',-,'. -""""- ~;;;.",-"-,-",,, ~... CONSTRUCTION NOTES. 1'> CONTRACTOR MUST APPLY FOR STREET OPENING PERMIT. 2.) ONE \lEEK NOTICE TO fIRE, STREET, POLICE, DEPT'S INCLUDING BUS CO. AND AMBULANCE CO. FOR STREET CLOSURE. . 3'> MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC TO BE IN ACCORDANCE TO MnDOT AND THE LATEST MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES MMUTCD. 4'> ALL \lORK SHALL COMPLY \lITH THE CITY OF HASTINGS 2003 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR STREET AND UTILITY \lORK. 5.) ALL YARD S\lALES SHALL BE 2.0;: MIN. GRADE. A .ð..ð!i. ENTRAHŒ TH!IU CONCRETE. CUIIIi a GUTTER- . .-. . .-~- BENCHMARKJ PER ENGINEERS OFFICE, CITY OF HASTINGS Top Ring Hydra.nt a.t Ba.hls Drive a.nd South Fronto.ge Rond, Elevo.tlon 811.'}4 feet. SECTION AA ." Q.-. IUCD ...... '"""'""""...... . o' CL-I IUŒO UH'" cøa£TE ..- ....-- TÝPICAL DRIVEWAY - ENTRANCE TYPE RE (RADIUS ENTRANCE) WARNING BUOR£ DICCINQ C4U. IXJPH£R STA/I" ONE C4I.L fOR L0C4T/ONS. 1I.5'-4Sf-OOOZ 01' /-/100-2"2-/ IISIS RCOIJIRCD I1'f lAW REV J-I-n EC 3 R 2 ------.- -. -.-. ..8 :8 LATEST REVISION: 2-6-2003 GRADING AND Prepared For: EROSION CONTROL PLAN Don Lawrence lOT 2. BLOCK 1 Lawrence Construction and Realty VAillY MANOR 2ND SUBDIVISION Hostlng~. I.In 55033 JOHNSON & SCOFIELD INC. LAND SURVEYORS 1203 MClin Street, Reel \.ling, Mn 55066, 651-388":'1558 SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEETS FILE NO.: 02088 . ./. ""r-;-:-/ I ' \ . ,; J" \ II/!;I ¡ t ~.,oN^ " f ¡ II í I \. ,p,"",""N.,.~ // / í: / " '.. \ ,..,'.d._', ,/!¡.f" l " """""..\, 4fi"'/'/ /,/~,' ~,ONf\}ECT )0 EXISTING 8 WM ","(:,\ç-'^//,..r/, //6" GATE :VALVE - WET TAP .,\ . ///('i ' f " .1..ØV9,;~,~'\. ßJ~$':.;'.I. f.' 1 E,A 1/8 - 6 BEND J\ '. \ / (~ fiw.', .' ( . ' \, \' // /'<¡Mr1~. ¡.I ;' \ \, f ./ / ~) 'f' .&' i í \ \\ J ( / / ' ¡~ 4> j i . 'L-.i L-.L-L.:.--~. ¡ \~ ¡ '/ f;' r ,ip '\\) :' / Ii ~ ;' / .., 9ß, !J-_._,-,,-~~.~.,_.~.....- .0"'" "":;;- 0"" ,.0. . ---'-=m" - ,'" ..... "" -- . L 'lo:¿.'=; . ." ¡þþJi¡. .-.. ,r;¡;¡...--""': l' ~)f: .,'" -' '----4.ít.1¡...,............[. ./ l1I í /// / ( / .rW' " ,( \, '<, \. \. \ " . .:.. w¡'. ::",{¡.; il::.~\~:/3ì . . .",,< " "" , \, ; ; .' on'M<t GJI.U'HIC BCALII ~.........LJ-1' T ..-1 ...... .. ., "1- úiA\j~ .. \, + ;¡.14~~h¡'¡ =.r::f&.":. n- -. f.-m:~' _.UTI_""" r==~~t':. -... ,.....' '1 ..IIIIL._v/£w. . , - -=-i~ )'--1 ... w " < ~ < " ~ < 0 )~v f f j ,/ ~ I , OJ CB 6 .@t,k ""'-:;I.."", ¡ '¥J:% """'...n.~ '^.,"'~~m..~'.-.--.,..w.",.^'_'" "'",.' ¡ "".,~.,. ! Ip.!,..", , ¡ r.. ----. - . j t I l . , 2 , I I '_nE ...-. -"8JOO'. .D<IIIL..:..1Dt.. HYDRANT INSTALLATION ßÐ" STANDARD VAUIE BOX SErnNG GGG Engineering Surveying Planning I H£REBY CEJI'IIrY _1 lHlS PlAN. SPECI- ~~~.œR~l~S~PAAmBY~ 011 UNDeR "Y DIRECT SUPEJI\IISION AND I "., " D\JI. Y UCENSED PROfESSIONAl. ENGlNEE UNDER 1H£ lAWS Of lHE ST" IE or IAINNESO1A. 241 Norlh WU1ono Sireet Chatfield. Mn. 55923 DATE Ph. 507-282-2683 REG. NO, - WATER METERS ""'- 4" WATER SERVICE W /G\/'-,. -.J ..."..,.,..,-",." 6x6x6 TEE AND 6x4 REDUCER """1 " "'" 6" SPRINKLER SERVICE AND STAQJD p'fþ 30 UNIT CONDO //...,..,.~,.,. """'.' , ,.""","""'" ...,.,......,.,..,.,,-: """"~.,",. B!~« CLEAN OUT' INV. 794.2 346 LF-6"DIP WM 40 LF-6"DIP \, r'h.'~~"" I \ \ \. ) ",....,--.,...",.Y , \, " ". "..... -""'" CB 5 ...0"""'--"""'" 5V;1..oo.Çß ~ ..Cd> ""-'" .c~'" "".'.ü' .:1\1~.46 ["""'J "';'1 ~"'.¡~b¡, '~'",",.-"", ;. <ft'"".." . ""I.,.hf1l:U'ff . '~'.""--'_""__M"'U."--"-'--""-'-""'- a,.,,:r'J:;r+ . . '. ' . ..,.-...,.--.-,.".--t <r'.'l'..n,d..--.. ~.'" _'m........,......-...."... "-'I." "~1 rHÀ?,~1¡) ç' 1'->.< iI' ,¡" CB 1 RIM 79B.5 NE INV 794.4 NW INV 794.5 S INV 794.5 75 LF - 15" PVC @ 0.407. CB 2 RIM 798.5 (NY 794.57 1 TlF - 15" PVC @ 0.40% ~~.n*,::" ....... -. -,""'" ., _. CB 3 RIM 798.5 N. INV 795.04 W. INV 795.1 135 LF - 15" PVC @ 0.407. CB 4 RIM 799.0 E. INV 795.5 W. INV 795.6 100 LF - 15" PVC WATERMAIN WET TAP ~ ~ ... :8 JOHNSON ~ SCOFIELD INC. LAND SURVEYORS 1203 Mo.in Street, Red \ling, Mn 5501:>6, 651-388-1558 .~._,. """""""'-"""""""."W "'N>o'r"-"."""""'."""N""""w"-'""""""",-"",,..,. j :r: \ ~ \ \ \ r-: (/) X w w u > a::: w (/) a::: w 3: w (/) >- a::: « t- :z « (/) 0 t- , t; w , z \ z , 0 , 0 1 -., J \ '! ¡ ". "\\i w ,..~..oo ~ ~ ..," ',., "... ..,.-..,....'"'"""",,,! I CB5 RIM 799.0 E. INV 796.2 W. INV 796.3 N. INV 796.3 135 LF - 15" PVC @ 0.40% CB 6 RIM 800.8 'NV 796.5 50 LF - 15" PVC @ 0.40% 0 0.407. WARNING BCFrJfI£ 0iCCINC ~ DOPH£R STAlE' ONe ÓUL fDR LOCATIONS. .5 I -454-0002 or I-tJOO-25Z- /l1S1S REOIJIRClJ BY tAW LATEST REVISION: 2-6-2003 SITE AND UTILITY PLAN Prepared for: Of Don Lawrence LOT 2, BLOCK I Lawrence Construction and Realty VALLEY MANOR 2ND SUBDIVISION Hasting~, loin 55033 fiLE NO,: SHEET 1 SHEETS 02066 OF 1 ¡ i ¡ i , . I , i / . ".","^"",..".,:>,~("""".""",,~y,¡,,+,..., .' "", ",y"",..", .'" ,-'" Y' '""t""", """~--'-'Y'_'_~M"'- ,"""", "" "~..>.~ ""N"J:....~"':,~,", ," "~~u,':=~"...,'.,.,....""""" j \ 6~6 \ ¡ ¡ " i ¡ , .. w """~"."""" ¡ 0:: \ « \ " , "', "'" """ \ 24' "10' \ I ,.I 0:: ' « u -.:t- I i1 ", , ' , , ; ( I , ! i? f / i~ ! /- )' "\ ., " \ \ \, ..' \:j¡, r"^ >, rh~Àf,;'?', ,~r:j",;,~' , , , ¡IP / /' ( '\, '. \ , "h "" d ", N ", ", 1 \ \ \ \. \ '-. } '........_-~",,>/ """'" ". "';'" :\" ""~. "..,m,y"""""",.". " . r-. '39 UNIT CONDO /""'--'~~~"....~",~ "".".,~/ 101"'.' '~~'~192t.- Bf1.,-(v" , "J"""25' 38' .,'.....,,'._,.... , ..t', \. {!~~û.ß9 (Fe) \, .' ømWí .ill; -.'" , , 7-'< ,""""~:,;~"""'~:-" ~~~"'.., ...,.,1 """ H1 fíW",jillJe.65 i.H}1~,3~ ~ am?.4~' t ".~" Øl!" ";,;,'}','.h' "1,. m",""""", , .' ,', f£¡;:¡ " >"" 'N .f'""---""';"Y""~--""" '-"'-'-'-"~'-'W""-""'"'*'Y_"~> , ' , ú¡;).s!, " ' 'Oft!, ~r"','"ï,~ ' , " ' ," "'" " " ',', €'\íCAi 1W¡~A~, amt5ú ---"_'yV"M'_~_~"'-+¡~¡;;~;¡~; .. ""'."""""'"1 ' n<¡¡l}t!l",\J. ¡ ¡ , ¡ ¡ , "'" """",""yV..."""""Y','y.."'",wy',,"',',,"""',", 'W""yY",,",....-....~-,,--,..,,-,..., ",..Y"'""""""'",,,,, Bfí{>,;<, ¡rs'i::¡fizi"""¡'Ì¡h"i&~' ;t; AC2425-M ¡ i ¡ ¡ ! ¡ I ¡ ¡ , ¡1 I' I ! , ¡ ¡ , ! ¡ '""" ',""'.. "I "1 ILLUMINANCE VALUES A VERAGE= 1.80 MAXIMUM=5.2 MINIMUM=0.3 AVG/MIN RATIO=6.00 MAXiMIN RATIO=17.33 hf.t\ 9H '1" aflf,j,Hfi LIGHTING PLAN 6" DIRECT MOUNT POLE HEIGHT=19' ADDITIONAL REQUIRED EQUIPMENT (4)-PAEH (BOLLARD PANEL FORECT. FIXTURES) (5)-PS3S19C1BZ (19'x3" SQUARE STEEL POLES) HEIGHT TO BOTTOM OF FIXTURES - AC: 21' AFG HEIGHT TO BOTTOM OF FIXTURES - E3: 9' AFG HEIGHT TO BOTTOM OF FIXTURE$ - E8: 3' AFG PROPOSED POLES MEET 120 MPH SUSTAINED WINDS BASE HEIGHT=2' LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE QTY LABEL 'ARRANGEMENT 5 AC250 ~NGLE 4 E8 70 SINGLE 9 E4 70 SINGLE LUMENS 19100 5040 5040 LLF 0.650 0.650 0.650 DESCRIPTION AC2425-M (250W MH) E8407-D (70W MH) E4407-D (70W MH) -Q- DENOTES PROPOSED LIGHT I HERE8Y CERNY 1HAT lHS PLAN. $PEa:- ncA1ION. OR REPORT WAS PREPAIIED BY liE OR UNDER IIY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND I All A DUlY UCENSED PROfESSIONAl ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STAT[ Of IIINNESOTA. \ ¡ , \ í¡ 1 ì \ I, \ 1 ¡ ¡ f-.;Fli ! \ !"i'J.,¡i,:þ P ;, \ """j ;è$>,tn ~. ' ,"":,-,~"""",, ¡~j""""X '~" ~,t~~ìJ;' , i GIW'IUC BCAU }.......-LU' i .--,' ...... .. JOHNSON 8c 'SCOFIELD INC. LAND SURVEYORS LATEST REVISION: 2-6-2003 CONCEPT PLAN Prepared for: Of Don Lawrence LOT 2. BLOCK 1 Lawrence Construction and Realty VALLEY MANOR 2ND SUBDIVISION Hastings. Mn 55033 ..8 ::8 Engineering Surveying Planning GGG 241 North Wlnana Street Chatfield. loin. 55923 Ph, 507-282-2683 1203 MQln street, Reel \¡,ling, Mn 55066, 651-388-1558 I fiLE NO,: 02088 DAT[ REO, NO, - SHEET 1 Of 1 SHEETS ". LA,. 61DING ITY,.) .... . r.r ""- ~ ,q I ".. ". 9 f-:y,...,..,. .. ~ "'1 ~' ,<¡ ,""". 9 f~"...,...- ~ ~ ~ .. '~, Af<C~ITECTURAL &l-<INGLE ITY,.) '" LAP 61DING ITY,.) - ~I'U " re,,"" 1.1. r~."'. .Q8'- -_.'" ~ .--- "' o, -' ;¡ I""'" Ú rco".. Q8.. ----~! ~ ~' '" EAST ELEvATION WEST ELEvATION V.'. r.e' ...' . r... .., '"~ LAP &lDIIÖ ITY,.) sou T ~ ELEvATION W'. r.r ~I ,""". 1.1 r~". c:oeTa '" ,. ---. - '" ~ ~ ,i IC>I"'" \J f~".. CleTa --~ ~ ~I ;? õ i.\ ~ .'1 'C>I"ø 9 f':Y". CIOI!!T8 '" s: "',- ~' .<i '"",ø 9 r-:".. CtOmI '" s: - ,. ~I :: õ .. Ilrl il'ili I i '-I'r-t!1 I i I r 1¡~I"liil r' I- i : .IUfhflhH I I z ~.. ~ 01 l} Z l :::J G:II æ 01 J- ill ~ tl) O~ z . C) Z i l} ill ~ I 3 ~~ I1J <t: f z .-J,.¡ ...... " ........ .. Ilor Il prOject no. R-Ø2-~12 \ ;~< - Label \ \ , \ \ \. \. '- "\, ,. \ '" \ <, \ "t^ , (¡(ì!tB3 ilií\;¡,9~\ Planting Schedule QUANTITY Common Name A C L M S F 3 7 5 6 15 G 123 GGG 241 North Winona Street Summit Ash Amur Choke Cherry Imperial Honey Locust Norway Maple Black Hills Spruce Planting Beds to consist of 10 Plantings ( I.E. Savin Juniper, Hughes, Winged Enonytious, Froebel Spirea, Jdpanese SP. Yeli) Chinese Lilac Engine e ring Surveying Planning I HERlBY C[R1!FY THAT TIllS PlAN. SPEC!- ncAlIOH. OR REPORT WAS PREPIJIED BY 11£ Oft UNDER IIY DIIIECT SUI'U'II5IDH AND I All A DUlY UC[N$[D I'ROf£S5IDHAl lANDSCAPE IJICIGTECT UNDER THE LAWS Of THE STATE or MINNESOTA. ..8 ::8 ~ ?-j~'_Y~'--'W'-"-_Y~---- 1 J nun . n'~' ' '~>"'~L,'m~~~~~"~",'"=~~~~~=Y~~:~~~,~~~> i i ,.w"-"'.~'^,"Y:7/"--."-~¡' .,..~"~.,y,,,,--,,~"Y"^""."" :~;'. ,.,. H",.r"" '1 /" ""- ,," ,~'tf' { ,I "1~=::~~' ~ n_", '..., \ " '", '\, 0 , " ( ~.C '"1.lt.l\, " \ \ """ \ '; "".,) '.~;\, I W ',> ""'" C> ,.«,.. æ < C> . "..Ii \ \ , \ \ \ i , \ ,.."""'>...,.,'_...~".^',.,.o_, -', '0, -, 30 UNIT CONDO /,.-.""",- ,."'~,.^,.,""',...>'" :' ....",,/// y"~--~.....,.,,-,, -,... fjtfJ -"" , t ¡1\" ,::..:::wo "'oX, ~t ,0" ! \' ;¡;l, "f" \ LANDSCAPE NOTES: Size 1.) INDIVIDUAL PLANTS SHALL HAVE WOOD CHIP MULCH. 2.) PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE EDGING WITH 3/4" WASHED RIVER ROCK WITH WATER PERMEABLE BARRIER. Mature 2" B-B 2" B-B 2" B-B 2" B-B 4' B-B #2 Pot 60' 40' 45' 50' 50' GRAPHIC SCALE )0 0 II >0 00 120 ~--.~ I I ( IN TEET ) 1 Inch a 30 IL 36" D.C. JOHNSON ~ SCOFIELD INC. LAND SURVEYORS LATEST REVISION: 2-6-2003 LANDSCAPE PLAN Prepared for: Of Don Lawrence LOT 2, BLOCK I Lawrence Construction and Realty VALLEY IAANOR 2N0 SUBOI\l1S1ON Hastings. !.In 55033 Chatfield. Mn. 55923 Ph. 507-282-2683 DATE REO. ND, ~ 1203 MQln Si:reet, Red \oIing, Mn 55066, 651-388-1558 I FILE NO.: 02088 SHEET 10ft SHEETS ;fF õ< Ou 3 -,;)25 LAND USE APPLICATION CITY OF HASTWGS 101 4th Street East, Hastings, NIN 55033 Phone (651)437.4127 Fax (651)427.7082 Address of Property Involved: Legal Description of Property Involved: Applicant: \ r , <L -...\ Name UMJJ rev, ~ \ II -ùCS Address 11 2 ~ <,() - 1'r\ ~ ~~~\'\ ~s m!\J ~~ ~ ~'? Phone . ,(0 LP I J - LL~~-__--- ----- F&y: Official Use Only, Date Rec'd ~ ? \ File No. Fee Paid Rec'd by Ordinance # Section Owner (If different from Applicant): - ~ am e S ChrY1 e..... Address - P-€~W Ol~~ Phone ~JCD~ Special Use: Subdivision: Vacation: Other: TOT AL: Request: Rezone: Comp Plan Amend: Site Plan: 'f Variance: Description of Request (include site plan, survey, and/or plat if applicable): 3 Date Signature of Owner Date - r ú) 2= ~ z 2= C) D z C) () ill () Z 2X6 I"\.A 12 ill ..AJNrI!D f'\ I =~T1!P ~ LN"5IØtN&TO ~ "'" TGIII!IUILD1N6 « ~ 1RIM ..AItC1"eD -1 ASf'H,A.L T SHIN6LES ON 112" I' 0VEII2HNIIS W O><E!OARD r ÞUMIMJM FASGIA !;t£ATHlN6 ON . SOFFIT MF6 . T1'aJ55E5 . 2". O.c,. t =~. t 6" VlN"fL LAP 5IDINIt GHAlN UNC 1M 12 W VIN'I1.. !!LA 1'5 - 51DE ELEV. OF GARAGE (TYP.) I/ð" '" 1'-0. ~T SHlN6LE5 ON 112. O><E!ONtD 5I-E!Å THlNIt ON H"6. 11IIU5!!!I!!5 . 2... O£'. 1/". . "-0- TRA5H ENc,LO5URE FRONT ELEV. OF ð CAR GARA6E (TYP.) I/ð" = ('-0" ~T SHIH6l.e5 ON 112" o>œo~ SHEA '""'NIt ON MF6 . TRJSeE5 . 2... O£'. I'~Þ'V ..a.LIJMINJM FA5GI,.. . 9OFf"IT = _I ....¡ FRONT ELEV. OF ð c,AR GARA6E (TYP.) 1\ II II U U u TRA5H ENCLO5URE - ELEVATION I/ð" = 1'-0" v... . 1'-0. D /2M WtJ/Oj . ". ... ".. . . .' VIII-B-2 M. Steven Haas Variance/Shoreland Variance -1009 3rd St E City Council Memo - June 16 2003 Page 1 Memo To: Mayor Werner and City Council From: Kris Jenson, Associate Planner Date: June 16,2003 Subject: M. Steven Haas - Variance #2003-40 to vary from the required front yard setback at 1009 3rd St E. REQUEST M. Steven Haas seeks to place a porch on the front of his home located at 1009 3rd Street East. The home currently meets the required front yard setback. The applicant is seeking a 5' variance to the 20' front yard setback to construct a front porch. This request involves 2 variances. Section 10.26 District Lot Regulations of the Zoning Code states that all structures within an R-2 District have a minimum front yard setback of 20'. The second variance is to the Shoreland Ordinance. Section 16.05, Subd. 2.1 Placement, Design, and Height of Structures (B) Additional Structure Setbacks (4 ) states that structures must be setback 20 feet from the right-of-way line public streets. The Shoreland Ordinance requires a public hearing for any variance request. RECOMMENDATION Denial of the request is recommended. Staff does not feel the applicant has demonstrated sufficient hardship to warrant approval of the variances. A resolution for denial of the variances is attached. The existing home currently meets all required setbacks. If the variance is approved and the porch constructed, the home will become a legal non-conforming structure. Any future proposed additions to the home would require a variance prior to construction. "."- r . ..,.." "~.. ." " M. Steven Haas Variance/Shoreland Variance - 1009 3rd St E City Council Memo - June 16 2003 Page 2 Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this request at the June 9, 2003 meeting. No one spoke for or against the variance at the meeting. The Planning Commission recommended denial of the variance by a 3-2 vote, citing lack of an applicable hardship as a reason for the denial. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Comprehensive Plan Classification The use conforms to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. The property is designated U-I - Urban Residential. Zoning Classification The subject property is zoned R-2 - Medium Density Residential. Single family dwellings are a permitted use in the R-2 District. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use The following land uses abut the property: Direction North East Existing Use Zoning Single Family HomeR-2 - Med Dens Res. Single Family HomeR-2 - Med Dens Res. 3rd Street East Single Family HomeR-2 - Med Dens Res. Single Family HomeR-2 - Med Dens Res. Comp Plan U-I - Urb Res. U-I- Urb Res. South U-I - Urb Res. West U-I - U rb Res. Existing Condition The existing home was built in 1890. It currently meets all setback requirements. Proposed Condition The proposed porch would be 6' deep and run from the west edge of the front of the home over to the garage. This would leave a 15' front yard setback. The zoning code does include a provision for a reduction in the front yard setbacks, which states: Where adjacent structures have front yard setbacks different from those required, the minimum front yard setback shall be the average setback of such structures, but in no case shall the front yard setback be less than 10 feet. The house to the east of the applicant's has a setback of about 16', but the home to the west faces Washington St, and is setback from 3rd Street about 37'. The average òf these 2 setbacks is 26.5'. - ,.. M. Steven Haas Variance/Shoreland Variance - 1009 3rd St E City Council Memo - June 16 2003 Page 3 VARIAN C E REVI EW Minimum Setback Requirements Minimum setback requirements for the R-2 District are: Area Setback Front 20' Interior Side 7' Rear 20' DNR Notification The DNR was notified of the public hearing on May 30,2003. To this date, Staff has not received any comments from the DNR regarding this variance request. Review Criteria The following criteria have been used as findings of fact in granting variances to zoning provisions: A. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. B. The literal interpretation of the City Code would deprive the applicants of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of Chapter 10. C. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from actions of the applicant. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by Chapter 10 to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. No non-conforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same district, and no permitted or nonconforming use of lands, or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance. Notification of Adjoining Property Owners Notification was sent to all property owners within 350'. One neighbor stopped in to City Hall to question what the effects of the variance would have on her property - but indicated that she did not live next to Mr. Haas. No other comments have been received at this time. -- ... M. Steven Haas Variance/Shoreland Variance -1009 3rd St E City Council Memo - June 16 2003 Page 4 ATTACHMENTS . Location Map . Site Plan . Application --- T HASTINGS CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 06- -03 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS DENYING VARIANCES FOR 1009 3RD STREET EAST HASTINGS, MINNESOTA Cou ncil member adoption: introduced the following Resolution and moved its WHEREAS, the M. Steven Haas has initiated consideration of two variances for the following legally described property: All of lot 6 and the west half of lot 7, Block 117, Town of Hastings Blocks 100 Thru 199 Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota Containing 13,799 square feet, more or less. WHEREAS, on June 9th, 2003, a review of these variances was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Hastings, and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS AS FOLLOWS: Those variances from the following ordinances: . Section 1 0.26 District Lot Regulations of the Zoning Code states that all structures within an R-2 District have a minimum front yard setback of 20'. . Section 16.05 of the Shoreland Ordinance, Subd. 2.1 Placement, Design, and Height of Structures (B) Additional Structure Setbacks (4) states that structures must be setback 20 feet from the right-of-way line public streets. are hereby denied based on the following findings of fact: 1. No hardship exists for the property. 2. The existing home complies with current setback requirements. The granting of a variance to the front yard setback would change the structure from legal conforming to legal non-conforming. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution shall be filed with the Dakota County Recorder's Office by the Hastings City Clerk. Council member moved a second to this resolution, and upon being put to a vote it was unanimously adopted by all Council members present. Adopted by the Hastings City Council on June 16th, 2003 by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: ATTEST: Michael D. Werner, Mayor Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk (City Seal) ---- r I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of resolution presented to and adopted by the City of Hastings, County of Dakota, Minnesota, on the 16th day of June, 2003, as disclosed by the records of the City of Hastings on file and of record in the office. Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk (SEAL) This instrument drafted by: City of Hastings (KKJ) 101 4th St. East Hastings, MN 55033 --- T LAND ¡;UJ5Ç APPLICATION CITY OF HASTINGS - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 101 4th Street East, Hastings, MN 55033 Phone: 651.480.2350 Fax: 651.437.7082 Address of Property: ! 00 c¡ f!. 3 Æ.d. ~ -l if Legal Description of Property: Applicant: Name Address Phone Fax' Email ., I / iþ¡ . Owner (If different from Applicant): Ç!l, 3I~ vef) CI 5 Name . " 0 9 " " 3 A:?c/ . - Address 1/11"5-!- /<ý) ~ c:;./ if/I/):I 65633 . u (ðS/- 437 - /.3;¿g Phone Fax Email. Description of Request (include site plan, survey, at:ld/or plat if applicable): " 7Í? "" Check applicable box(es): ~ ., Note: All fees and escrow amounts due at time of. application. Final Plat Minor Sub." Rezone Spec. Use Variance Annexation EAW Prelim Plat ,; Site Plan $600 $500 $500 $500 $250 $500 plus legal expenses $500 plus $1000 escrow $500 plus escrow:' - Under 10 acres: $3000 ($500 Planning + $2500 Engineering) - Over 10 acres: $6000 ($1000 Planning + $5000 Engineering) $500 plus escrow: - 0 - 5,000 s.t.: $1500 (Engineering) . - 5,000 - 10,000 sJ.: $2500 ($500 Plar:1ning + $2000 Engir:1eering) - 10,000 - 50,000 sJ.: $3250 ($750 Planning + $2500 Engineering) " - 50,000 sJ. +:.$4000 ($1000" Planning + $3000 Engineering) Administrative Lot Split Comp Plan Amendment House Move Lot Une Adjustment Vacate ROW/Easement $50 $500 $500 $50 $400 TOTAL: "-.frf . Signature of Applicant Date f~ Date ~~~~ -- Signature of Owner ~-/6 -0;3 Applicant Name and Title - Please Print h. Owner Name - Please Print .:.s-r E ¿/ ¿::- rt/ ~A5 4/23/2003 Official Use Only I , File#~ Fee Paid ,'" r~J~ . Rec'd By: ~ Receipt # ' , 'O~ Date Rec'd App. Complete - T CD gw -eftS... :ü mE: en )-CU-c ..,>'" C~M OCJcn ....cao u..cO ... ~ CD en ~ C Z 00 .2 - to 0 0 ~ ......I CI) - .- en IIJ c m = ,~ ~ -c en C) ~ c: .5 () "C CD (J) :2 (,) ca L0- t» "5 0 ro m a: a.. (J) ...J 0 : , " , '" moo .,.m.n..""'--- """"_'00""'-"'-"""""""'00'-" . . , . . . L..,i ...-. "'0000'" r"""----"'--' .'\ """", ¡ . U"""" \, ; ", .. ""'00 .,. .,...:.........00""""""""""""".00......"""",,'" ....., ¡ ¡ ¡ : ¡ : : ¡ ¡ j ¡ ! ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ \ ¡ ¡ ¡ . ':::::::::::::::::::::::::"" . , \ I ! kDÄMSmST.__.._2~..../ ."'" '-"" 00"""- ....-.. .__"'00 _'00 00'-'" .-... '" - I ~ -\] ..... ¡ \ II \ i I , Ln..,i ,..,........---..._m.............WAS H I N.GIQ.~..,.S.I.---.....--m.. i...".. < I::~:~="~~~=C~_"=:~7"::=:C~\ f¡ r~::===~-~c=~===~-~~;_. .) , \ \ ","""~.:::: ./ ; : ' ';"'::1"",\", [-1 . . . . ~;'(";';; ..~,;.~.: '0..,0.. """'" ...-' : , '. """ "00""""'-" .... ....,... 00'-'- -.....-......... .. 00 .. ..., 00"""" . . f' ..' ......"'00""-""""""'" """,,"", ", \ ("""00""" "'" ;.1 0""'00'00 .....-....-........ ""_"'00' nn--_"'" ""'00""_---""" '["""1 \ I i:¡: I,:: l.:::::::::~:~:~~.._..........~:n: ~..._..._..._".."._._......_.... ,,[L,..I """00'" "",_,'_"00""'- Wi,=-\. I-j cnL.._m. -......-,.......¡ 0 C~~~~~~~. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~n- (::k: ¡-...nn.. ""'00'_"""""" ('t) I . '" j:::::::::::::::::: ¡"'-""~r---""'~ ry . . c..-..-..... L:J \ r""""',,:::::": ¡ i.---...- ~....-.. '0...... ( \ '\ '\ , I \ \ -~J\ {\,,\ \ \ : \ \ \ \\ <:) 0 \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \\' , \ \\, \ \ \\ \ \\ \ . \ '. \ \ :'. \ ì \ . \ \ / ,. " " ~. . ,,' \ 1 .'.~--,>"". .,..---..'--.:......' \ -....-- .- ---¡ I . t '\ ".. , \ \ .,..-".....- .-...- '.,:.r-- ...-.',... ,--~ M'~"; ". , . ...."" " i '. I . \ : \' " \ ~ , ' . ' .- ......,.. ,.! \ .. - - --"- '-- -, ¡ , , , ' \ I II II Of I II I ï. / .. '/ '-0 ( f. ; ¡- \ f; " , \ ... - \~.' \ ' \ t , \ I \\ ! I . : i \ F I I J .. I " f r---" ! \ . '1 ¡ V i \ :J .l \ , ( ; .! , . " " \ , \ " \, ! , I !--- ._""- Î / I / ! , / ! . // 1/ LL I / ; J / /Æ I I I L1 ...- T . \ I ., ' ~ 1/ . --..-IL...... j- 1-;' .' f . ' / ,.-' r //- /- . ,...._...1."..,_..-......--.-....,..,....--.....------ I . . FEE OWNER: PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 19-32151-o7~17 M STEPHEN & SUSANNE HAAS 10093RDSTE HASTINGS MN 55033-1408 PROPERlY ADDRESS: 1009 3RD ST E HASllNGS MN 55033 PAYABLE 2002 TAXES NET TAX: NIA SPECIAL ASSESSMEN1S: NIA TOTAL TAX & SA: NIA PAYABLE 2004 ASMNT USAGE:RESIDENTIAL ¡ i . ¡ -Í ..- ." " \, t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ¡; [ t ~ ~ r ,; ~ l ¡: [ f I I { ¡ ¡ ; t ! ì ¡ , " ~ r ¡ ¡ t : l 1 , I' ¡ l [ , r i i ~ ¡ i. r , " 11 ,,/ t r ~ ~ \ '--....=: . ~ C I. ~ ! f r I \ \ ..... "- " r , . . \ i \ í. ~ í. SITE MAP 2003 ESTIMATED MARKET VALUES (pAYABLE 2004) LAND: BUILDING: TOTAL: SCHOOL DISTRICT: 37,000 118,100 155,100 200 lOT SIZE (EXCLUDES ROAD EASEMEN1S) 13,799 sa FT 0.32 ACRES LOCA110N: NW1/4 NE1/4 SECTION 27-115-17 PAYABLE 2004 HOMESTEAD STATUS: FULL HOMESlEAD WATERSHED DISTRICT: VERMILLION RIVER LAST QUALIFIED SALE: DATE: AMOUNT: " ~ I ¡ I ~ i ! t . . ¡ ~ I !J ¡¡ . : Jï / 2003 BUILDING INFORMATION (pAYABLE 2004): TYPE S.FAM.RES YEAR BUILT 1890 ARCHIS1YLE 1-314 SlRY FOUNDAll0N SQ FT 977 FINISHED SQ FT 1462 BEDROOMS 3 BATHS 1 FRAME WOOD GARAGE SQ FT 727 OTHER GARAGE MISC BLDG 'i ~ ; g i r ~ i ----......J t ~ ~ \, "\ " ...---- l ,- [. r r ~ f ~ r n Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡ r ¡ r I i \ \ \- " \. "'. "". "", ./-- .- r- 1 f [ ~ ~ '\ ",. \'\ t . ! '\ I \ g 221 , E h f t ~ ¡ J ! i ~.~~ It) NOTE: Dimensions rounded to nearest foot. Copyright 2003, Dakota County- ~~(!f-l f . , " " ~ ~ : , Th~s dra~ng ~s neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing IS a compilation of records, information and data located in various city, county, and state offices and other sources. affecting the area shown. and is to be used for reference purposes only. Dakota County is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained, If discrepancies are found. please contact Dakota County Survey and Land Information Department Map Date: April 2, 2003 Aerial Photography. 1991 Parcels Updated: 2/1312003 0 ... '.' I 1023 , . l . ~.--- ~ t t , L- - . r-¡. i ~ ,; . , . ; : ' ¡ i i f = . ., . " ; : , ~ .. ~ l " : ¡: ,: \ ¡ ; ì r-rr-r- ¡ , t I' I : ; , ~ i ~ i' 5 ¡ t n n . " p ---- ~ { ; " , ¡ . ~ 1 h N PLAT NAME: TOWN OF HASTINGS BLKS 100 THRU 199 TAX DESCRIPTION: ALL OF LOT 6 BLK 117 & W HALF OF 7117 T VII'-B-3 Patrick Mancino - Variance - 502 ih St w City Council Memo - June 16, 2003 Page 1 Memo To: Mayor Werner and City Council From: Kris Jenson, Associate Planner Date: June 16,2003 Subject: Patrick Mancino - Variance #2003-43 to enlarge a non-conforming structure located at 502 7th Street West. REQUEST Patrick Mancino seeks to place an attached garage at the rear of 502 7th Street West. The existing home is a legal non-conforming use. RECOMMENDATION Approval is recommended. The home was constructed well before any zoning regulations were in place, and the addition is in line with the existing sides of the home. The proposed addition itself meets all required setbacks. The variance is required due to the fact that the current front yard setback is approximately 8' - 10'. The Zoning Code states that a non-conforming structure may not be enlarged, thus a variance is required in order for any construction to take place. Planning Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed this item at their June 9, 2003 meeting. They unanimously (5-0) recommended approval of the variance, based on the fact that the home was built prior to the adoption of zoning regulations, and the new addition would not encroach into the required setback. Heritage Preservation Candidate An application has been submitted to have the home added to the local Heritage Preservation List. A certification by the Planning Commission that the home is in compliance with the uses allowed in the R-2 Zoning District and the Comp Plan was on the agenda for the same meeting. .~~-,_~~'"d_.,___, ,-,-,','"."",.,.,',.., ,~ "r , . .~~...."'",.......,.""~,,.,.~~~-,.._.._,,.~,~,~,.._,~.~~=, Patrick Mancino - Variance - 502 th St w City Council Memo - June 16, 2003 Page 2 Comprehensive Plan - Heritage Preservation Plan The Heritage Preservation Plan is included as Chapter 3 of the Comprehensive Plan. Goal 4 of the Heritage Preservation Plan states the following: The City shall protect those sites, structures, districts, areas and objects (properties) which have been nominated by the HPC and designated by resolution of the City Council. The City also recognizes that an endangered property which has not yet been designated but may qualify for designation should be protected until a recommendation has been made by the HPC. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Comprehensive Plan Classification . The use conforms to the 2020 Comprehensive Plan. The property is designated U-I - Urban Residential. Zoning Classification The subject property is zoned R-2 - Medium Density Residential. Single family dwellings are a permitted use in the R-2 District. .. . Adjacent Zoning and Land Use The following land uses abut the property: Direction North East ExistJ!!g Use Zoning Single Family HomeR-2 - Med Dens Res. Forest Street Single Family HomeR-2 - Med Dens Res. 7th Street West Single Family HomeR-2 - Med Dens Res. Single Family HomeR-2 - Med Dens Res. Comp Plan U-I- Urb Res. U-I - Urb Res. South West U-I - U rb Res. U-I- Urb Res. Existing Condition The existing home was built in 1845. It sits at the front of the lot, with many mature trees on the east side of the lot. There is an existing carriage house/garage at the rear of the property, which the property owner plans to keep. It should be noted that were the property owner to request a detached garage, the existing carriage house would have to be removed per ordinance that only allows 1 detached structure over 120 square feet. A variance would not have been required had a detached garage been requested. ..- r Patrick Mancino - Variance - 502 7th St W City Council Memo - June 16, 2003 Page 3 Proposed Condition The applicant is proposing to remove a lean-to at the rear of the building and add a garage and living areas above. Because the property slopes down from the front of the lot to the rear, the applicant is proposing to construct the garage in such a way that the living area above the garage is at the same level as the existing first floor of the home. The proposed driveway indicated on the site plan will need to be hard surfaced (concrete, asphalt, or like material) and must be no wider than 24' at the rear property line. The maximum driveway width is a requirement of the parking section of the zoning code. VARIAN C E REVI EW Minimum Setback Requirements Minimum setback requirements for the R-2 District are: Area Setback Front 20' Corner Side 10' Interior Side 7' Rear 20' Review Criteria The following criteria have been used as findings of fact in granting variances to zoning provisions: ' A. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. B. The literal interpretation of the City Code would deprive the applicants of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of Chapter 10. c. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from actions of the applicant. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by Chapter 10 to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. No non-conforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same district, and no permitted or nonconforming use of lands, or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance. -, T' Patrick Mancino - Variance - 502 ¡th St w City Council Memo - June 16, 2003 Page 4 Notification of Adjoining Property Owners Notification was sent to adjoining property owners. No comments have been received at this time. ATTACHMENTS . Location Map . Site Plan . Application .-T. HASTINGS CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 06- -03 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR 502 7TH STREET WEST HASTINGS, MINNESOTA Councilmember adoption: introduced the following Resolution and moved its WHEREAS, the Patrick Mancino has initiated consideration of a variance for the following legally described property: East 10 feet of Lot 3 and all of Lot 4, Block 58, Town of Hastings Blocks 1 Thru 99 Addition, Dakota County, Minnesota Containing 10,616 square feet, more or less. WHEREAS, on June 9th, 2003, a review of this variance was held before the Planning Commission of the City of Hastings, and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS AS FOLLOWS: That a variance is approved for Section 10.06 Subd. 4 Non Conforming Structures to enlarge a legal non-conforming structure by the addition of a garage at the rear of the house at 502 7th Street West, based on the following findings of fact: 1. The existing structure was constructed prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance. 2. That literal interpretation of the code would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by others. 3. The proposed addition would not further encroach into the required setbacks. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution shall be filed with the Dakota County Recorder's Office by the Hastings City Clerk. Council member moved a second to this resolution, and upon being put to a vote it was unanimously adopted by all Council members present. Adopted by the Hastings City Council on June 16th, 2003 by the following vote: Ayes: Nays: Absent: ATTEST: Michael D. Werner, Mayor Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk (City Seal) .-r I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a true and correct copy of resolution presented to and adopted by the City of Hastings, County of Dakota, Minnesota, on the 16th day of June, 2003, as disclosed by the records of the City of Hastings on file and of record in the office. Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant/City Clerk (SEAL) This instrument drafted by: City of Hastings (KKJ) 101 4th St. East Hastings, MN 55033 -> i LAND ~lJJ~ APPLICATION CITY OF HASTINGS - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 101 4th Street East, Hastings, MN 55033 Phone: 651.480.2350 Fax: 651.437.7082 Address of Property: Legal Qesc~i9ßon Qtfrqp~rty: ;...:.,r '-jh;";r"('. (:3 Tt- -i.., ~~ ':( ,~,i- ß.¿t..c:/:, ;---JF'?";/- Eic-:"I"/ ,')-j-).oor: ì~'-o",/("':/7'/1 ;./~",ú f'\ (....~..; ,,^-Co ~ .' l.c:, j ""/'" r'T~i!::-t.:'-r- ~"..., r-I fC- or-;;: ( "<'.,"-,",,.:,-:'7 i~;... I fIco C;"-r;-":~ <F'O..- ,TOh"" c._o_,-,r-y!"c.c:.....zoJ.',::..."" ..q ¡<.ü ,-7-1 :_o:;..,.o.....ì"";' 1.¡¡,' e."t ('-o¡1:.~/.f~' ',T"I"r."!.~:Z'o"", "rNT" ":-V"-- ;-l/c./-'.';-SJ,~'"",,:-"!,~'-'o.,-ç'f': ~/rJ ¿.:.~~-r),..,,".I'...C"(...." c::)...¡.- Ó l ,:.. c-.<. F I pr"-/- £. ¡ (..: /'7"/ ( S- 8-") ß ¡=ë-, I.!-r S',fl! ¿J o_y Applicant: Owner (If different from Applicant): Name Pr177Z.iCK 1--1 þl",:C./!'I.. GO Name Address PfJ. 8c~0 ¿I'o~ / Address f-.-1 '/~°l'v' c:,'l Pelt. i ~ I--:l.,v <." ~;,é ~ 1..;2... 7.-;2. if ~¿;J (.~ 3 Phone Fax .-Efflail Ir~~/¿ :;-~:::. ;,.;;" 7Ti+ ¡iN- :; ¡-¡ A.. , (~ r- s-/ (,'-',j Phone Fax Email ~- J:'.). - ",,-1 '/0- i S-5-:;)... Description of Request (include site plan, survey, and/or plat if applicable): ¡/.4.P-.; (~ ,~jC c'o Check applicable box(es): /. Final Plat Minor Sub. 0 Rezone Spec. Use Variance Annexation EAW Prelim Plat Site Plan TOTAL: Signature of Applicant Note: All fees and ,escrow amounts due at time of application. Administrative Lot Split Comp Plan Amendment House Move Lot Line Adjustment Vacate ROW/Easement '" '"_0- $50 $500 $500 $50 $400 $600 $500 $500 $500 $250 $500 plus legal expenses $500 plus $1000 escrow $500 plus escrow: - Under 1 0 acres: $3000 ($500 Planning + $2500 Engineering) - Over 1 0 acres: $6000 ($1000 Planning + $5000 Engineering) $500 plus escrow: - 0 - 5,000 sJ.: $1500 (Engineering) - 5,000 .. 10,000 s.f.: $2500 ($500 Planning + $2000 E!1gineering) - 10,000 - 50,000 sJ.: $3250 ($750 Planning + $2500 Engineering) - 50,000 sJ. +:.$4000 ($1000 Planning + $3000 Engineering) Date Signature of Owner Date //1) ,~~../_.."/ /'//0:":7.'1 '-"~ ""'. '*o --""'"00('-"'-0 :{,.. .,,:.,-c;.. ,o_,,",""~ _/ \ s. "':)(; ~) "... '~ .. I( _J Applicant Name and Title - Please Print Owner Name. Please Print P I~ '¡r:~ ;( Ie:. ',-,,71" . 1'- I;"-~ f, y ;1....' "-... ',' ,~, C 1.-....,1- r:'< 4/23/2003 Official Use Only J I File # 2003-'-1 ~ Fee Paid 'LSO . Ot) S/d4/0'? Rec'd By: ~ Receipt # 1 CfJO(PO Date Rec'd App. Complete -- T roo " "'" "'it""""""""""""" if' :J1 r"""') .. -1 :::.::::.:-:~...." . , ï ::::::::::::::::::::::::! r:::. '::::. .:::::::::::::::::\ ~..,.................,.....~ ([;; ~;~~ ;~~~;;;;;; ~; ;;;;; ~;;;;;;;] r:~~ ~':~': ~ ~':':':~':~~~~':':~ ~':~':~~~ 1r ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~'I i i \ \ .~-_\ \ ¡¡ ¡ ! ' ........'t....;:: ¡¡ \ ¡¡ ¡¡ :"" ¡! ¡¡ 'q .: """"1\ ' Ii ..II ! !. ; .,...,.....................,......::'....:::::::::::::::~::::::::"ìj ...""".~'.'.~':"'-'-'.'.','.'.'.'.'."'" ! tTI ¡¡ Ie! H I !! ! j:;o ¡¡ 1m: II ! !i !(J) i¡ i . ': ' iH' \i ! !, Ii I !, Ii ¡ I: ¡: I 1~1\ I! ¡ IU/" I !i-l !\ ¡ " LJlJ I -. I II 11 ¡¡ !i I II II: ~ ¡I:::I II: ',', I : I ' , ,I II II ", " '" ¡ ¡: u ............I! ¡ \""""""""".I""""""",""""""""""'~I"""""""""""'I L",",.."",; ",,;JL "'" :::" :",: \J t:":,, ;:",,;; :"" "" ;" L¡:;;;;:;;;::;;;;:;;;;;; ;;;;:::: ;.' \\;;;;;;;; ;; ;:;Jt.:,~:;,~,:;,:;::::;~;:;,:;,:;;,:;;;,~;Jt;;;;;;;;;;;;; ::; :I 7TH aT W C~~~~:~:~~"lT ::::,,:::::,,"~: ::,,:,,"1 C"~",,:':':'::' :'t:'""j'! ",,',,',,',,':,,: """;""':"",,'::,,';;,,,,,,:¡ 1 \" \ \ \ ¡ ¡ II \\. , \: : ¡¡ , , , , \ ! ! ¡, ! I /", iit,.." ii ! '<"""'\" Ifi;'¡"::::':!' ......m." I:i , , , , , , , t-'{ ~ .r .' , ./..j ",,<,,""'/\ ¡/ /' I \ r I \ \ . , 3¡ I !T ~ : ! I ¡ L:::::::: ::::: :::':: f:::::::.~ , , , , . . , , . , , . '........."" ............ .......... ........ ,...- , . I",.¡ ':If,:: <f.)¡~ r¡:;~;: ;;;: :::::::::::: r::::: ::::~: :::::: ::::::::: ::: :~::ü :::: :::. :.:: ::. II ¡ \ II ¡i Ii ¡¡ Ii ¡! ¡i ¡i ¡¡ ¡¡ ¡¡ !! U. Variance Req uest Addition to Non- Conform i ng Strùctu re 502 7th St W Legend Buildings .../ \.....,/: Roads 0 Parcels N - I ! '.'IW~E crrt or II/&&11NOS I S Site Location ~ '-.Ç ~ ~ ~ ~ --- \S' - U! ~t- 11\~ 11\-[ I ~~ n.. a t- - ~:I~ ~ Qt:Q -Q3Q N -1z-1 -' 11.. \911.. G ~ <t! ~ ¡:: ~ x ill ~. ~ \-D d) -w -J ~ :I d) I- <l :J: .~ """- T" 1:- r .' , .;. /. .':\ .. ¡ ~ þ ...... . i--: ..:" ~ ..,~.~ .~ . ~ ,. ~ Q cO ~ ): ~ r - - --"7 ... - --!,.:...t 1-- r I I . I.. 1 I ~.J. r ."'. I I .:.~, I . F..'ot' ~ I ,,~, .~ I I ] !4 ~ I I I I I I I I I I .J I I I ~ I I I "" I I I I I I I I I I~ I II ~ II I " I " I II .1 I, I II I II I II I I, I 'I I II I II I II I I, I II I II I JJ--i - - - ~ -:'". I I =-----~LJ ( I1J <iI-x u~õ o..zïtf ÇOw U ) .--...-.--- ---...---..--.-- ".m.._- ----- rl -----=~ I I ~-I ,I I ,I I ,I I " I I I ,I , " , I' , " I II I ,I I ,I I II I ,I I I' , I I ~ :' ~ !~ I ~ I ~ij I I I o..~ I 'I -~~ 111-/ I 'L I L I II I I I I I I I I , I I I I I L I L -1 I I I I I I I LJ ==--1 I -1- ,0 I ~ ~ I, o~ ~ ( ~~~ ~git ) ,/ c ~ f5ß -() a: a: 8~ -,::I :Ci!~ :x: ~8uj a:~ ./ J ,/ ~ ~.~ . \.J ~ (1),- ;? --\-.~ J\~ ~ ~ r ~ NlW ,9-.' o~ ~ ~ ~ ( t "C - 1 õ 1 ¡: ã 1 Q ( ( ( 1 (; - . - 1 { :.. t- ill ill ~ t- to t- ill ill (l () 1.L II '" , - . , ~ ~ . REMOVE EXISTING LEAN-TO STRUCTURE ----1 41'-21 NEW ADDITION I ." IØØI-ØI - ffiQEE.RTY ~ EXISTING ALLEY -- r ~ I 151-ØU 231-61 ill Z --1 >- I-- œ ill I~ (L . ~ I N ..q- J' - "" I ï ú) -... s r T. E F Ilbl . 1'-ø' viNYL SIDING, GJ GJ l::.. l::.. 18:-3 ;/8' ~ TOF OF FLATE, 16' - ~ (¡)~ \ 1AtJ,~' ---- rw y, ~ I yJ .. E BEYOND, . (YA~IES) \ DDDDDf:~ 00000 00000 00000 00000 DDDDD 00000 00000 "1 I I I I I I I I I I I I ~~T---------------~-------------------T~~ L_~____-------------------------------~-~ .~-E.~~~I~ED REAR ELEVATION IØ'-2 114' ~ FIRST FLOOR ALIGN WIT'" E><ISTlNa, J.IOUSE FLOOR rGRADE BEYOND (VARIES) Nov-t\'\ ç lcll {; \fN {):J:1- OYJ 0'-Ø' ~ (:JARAGE FLOOR . ""0 "" '~. '0"", VII'-B-4 Memo To: Mayor Werner and City Council From: John Hinzman, Planning Director Date: June 16,2003 Subject: City of Hastings - First Reading - City Code Amendment #2003-38 - Chapter 10 (Various Sections) - Downtown Master Plan REQUEST The City Council is asked to consider first reading of the attached amendment to Chapter 10 of the City Code (Zoning Ordinance) relating to adoption of the Downtown Master Plan. Upon approval of first reading, second reading and final adoption would occur on July 7, 2003 The proposed amendments are changes to the text of the Zoning Ordinance only. Changes to the zoning map (rezonings of properties) would be considered at a later date upon adoption of the language. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval of the changes at the June 9, 2003 meeting. The Commission previously reviewed the changes on May 12, and held a public hearing on May 27 (please see attached minutes). PUBLIC NOTIFICATION The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the changes at the May 27, 2003 meeting. A post card outlining proposed changes was sent to all residents of the City within the limits of the Downtown Master Plan. The card gave notice of this meeting, and directed citizens to the City's web site where proposed code changes, and future meetings are posted. ATTACHMENTS . Zoning Code Amendment . Planning Commission Minutes - May 27, 2003 . Downtown Master Plan land Use Map . Downtown Hastings Master Plan Proposed Code Modifications - í :".',"""'.'.,'",,, ,',,;;: C',':,::",,','. :" ::.. :':,',',':"",,';',,; "',C':.,,,,:,',,:,....;;:..:, '",','::,"', , " ".,', ,,;'.. ".-" ";'" ",:,:"",:,:,..,'..', '::"..',.. ','," " ,',' .' ""c":,'::"",;"',::""",','>,,,, "..,,",:'::,::,';c.'..':,;'::! 1st READING DRAFT June 16, 2003 ORDINANCE NO. , SECOND SERIES AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HASTINGS, MINNESOTA AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 10 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE HASTINGS CITY CODE PERTAINING TO: ADOPTION OF THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Hastings as follows: SECTION 10.05. APPLICATION OF DISTRICT REGULATIONS sueD. 5 ACCESSORY BUILDING AND STRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS 8) The sidewall height of accessory structures shall be limited to 10 feet, unless architectural elements are incorporated such as exterior materials chanae or buildina offset to reduce the massiveness and starkness of the wall. 9) The heiqht of any accessory structure shall not be taller than the primary structure SECTION 10.09. PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS. SUBD. 7. MINIMUM AND MAXIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS. a) General (6) Existina structures and uses within the DC and RMU Zoning Districts ~ to the adoption of the Downtown Master Plan (May 5. 2003L§ball be considered in conformance with the minim.JillL..Parkina and loading mguirements of this section. provided the use and intensity is unchan~ Parking and loadina requirements for any intensification of an existinq buildina or use. or construction of a new buildinq shall be determined by a proof of parking study. When a stu,gv is required. the Urban Land Institute's 1983 publication. Shared ParkinQ Standards. the Institute 0 f Transportation - T .. , feåuced---üRless in conform3nce v..'itA-aJ.I requirement-s--ef Section 10.08. Council may, at----it&--åiscretion, Qf8At exceptions wit.ßiA--the "Do'..vntov/n" . . . . . SECTION 10.10. DISTRICT USE REGULATIONS. sueD. 1. ZONING DISTRICTS. The City is hereby divided districts: a) A Agriculture. b) R-1 Low Density Residence. c) R-2 Medium Density Residence. d) NC Neighborhood Conservation e) OSR Open Space Residence f) R-3 Medium-High Density Residence. g) R-4 High Density Residence. h) . . . RMU Residential Mixed Use. i) R-6 Manufactured Home Park Residence. j) C-1 General Commerce. k) C-2 Highway-Auto-Specialized Commerce. I) C-3 Community Regional Commerce. m) DC Downtown Core District n) C-4 Regional Shopping Center. 0) 0-1 General Office. p) 1-1 Industrial Park q) 1-2 Industrial Park Storage/Service r) P-I Public Institution. s) VSO Vermillion Street Overlay District into the following use SECTION 1 0.13A. R-2 - MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENCE. (Section unchanged, except for numbering) SECTION 1 0.13B. NC - NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION. sueD. 1. INTENT. The intent of the NC District is to provide standards that protect the residential character of single family areas surroundina the downtown. This District ..- r ~""",.-.""""--""",,,,',,,""""""-'-'--"""-'-"""'""-"""",-""""-",--"""""",,,--,',,",-,,,""""--'--"""'--'" ".-'" ""'--""--"'-""""""'" "'., .., ,."""",~-"__""'h""""h""U"'."""~""""",'"""",,"..."~_.,,.~ is intended to provide reaulations that promote traditional neiQhborhood desiQ11 Residential neiÇ1hborhoods surroundinq the downtown incorporate many traditional ~hborhood desiQn features such as alleys. carriaQe houses. front porches. period sensitive housinQ desiQn. sidewalks. and traditional street liqhtinq. Preservinq and enhancina traditional neiahborhood desian is the qoal of this District. sueD. 2. USES PERMITTED. a) Same as permitted in the R-1 Low Density Residence District. b) Two family/multiple family dwellinqs. includinQ both new construction and conversions of existinq sinqle family dwellinqs. c) Fire Stations and Library. d) Bed and Breakfast lodalng facilities subject to the following criteria: (1) That the facility shall be part of a formally desiQnated local. state. or national historical structure. (2) That a maximum of ten bed and breakfast units may be established in a stru ctu re. (3) That the facility shall have a minimum size of 2.500 gross square feet. (4) That all bed and breakfast units shall be established within the princi~ structure. (5) That one off street parkin(l§pace shall be provided for the home plus one §Pace for each bed and breakfast unit. (6) That not more than one identification siQ!) not exceedinq two square feet in area may be attached to each wall that faces a street. (7) That the lot on which a bed and breakfast facility is l2rQPosed shall have a minimum area of 7000 square feet plus 1000 square feet for each unit in excess of five units. e) Accessory livinCLguarters in accordance with the City of Hastings Building Code. SUBD.3. USES BY SPECIAL PERMIT. a) Residential Care Facilities - dependent and semi-independent subject to the conditions listed at Section 10.12. Subd. 3B. b) ~hborhood Commercial subject to the site plan review requirements of Section 10.27. c) Towers as re~ulated bv Section 10.05 Subd. 12 of this cha~ SUBD. 4. BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN wrovals Qranted through buildin(lpermit. site plan, special use permit. or planned residential development shall require conformance with the ~hborhood Conservation ,District Standards of the Oriainal Hastings Desian Guidelines as adopted by the City Council. SECTION 1 0.13C OSR - Open Space Redevelopment District - r sueD. 1. INTENT. The intent of the OSR District is to provide standards that allow existinQ sinqle and two family patterns to continue. but anticipate larQer scale redevelopment 0 f areas t hat may bet he result 0 f public i mprovement ~ such as commuter rail. street systems. and storm water treatment facilities. Attached housinq areas that result from redevelopment should be desiqned in a manner to connect open spaces to adjacent qreenway\preserve areas alonq Lake Isabel. SUBD. 2. USES PERMITTED. a) Same as permitted in the R-1 Low Densitv Residence District. b) §lngle and multiple family dwellinqs when developed as a Planned Residential Development. c) Fire Stations and Library. d) Bed and Breakfast lodq!ng facilities subject to the following criteria: (1) That the facility shall be part of a formally desiqnated local. state. or national historical structure. (2) That a maximum of ten bed and breakfast units may be established in a structure. (3) That the facility shall have a minimum size of 2.500 gross square feet. (4) That all bed and breakfast units shall be established within the princi~ structure. (5) That one off street parkinÇL§pace shall be provided for the home plus one §Pace for each bed and breakfast unit. (6) That not more than one identification siQn not exceedinQ two square feet in area may be attached to each wall that faces a street. (7) That the lot on which a bed and breakfast facility is QIQPosed shall have a minimum area of 7000 square feet plus 1000 square feet for each unit in excess of five units. sueD. 3. USES BY SPECIAL PERMIT. a) Residential Care Facilities - dependent and semi-independent subject to the conditions listed at Section 10.12. Subd. 3B. b) ~hborhood Commercial subject to the site plan review requirements of Section 10.27. c) Towers as regulated bv Section 10.05 Subd. 12 of this cha~ SUBD. 4. BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN ðQprovals qranted through buildinÇLPermit. site plan. special use permit. or planned residential development shall require conformance with the Open Space Redevelopment District Standards of the Oriainal Hastinas Desian Guidelines as m!Qpted bv the City Council. SECTION 10.16 USE DISTRICT RMU - RESIDENTIAL MIXED- -- r sueD. 1. INTENT. The intent of the R-á RMU zone is to encourage the development of higher density multiple family dwellings and limited commercial activities adjacent to the downtown area to suQPort the activities in the Downtown Core District, to serve as a transitional district from commercial to lower density residential districts, provide an area for restricted commercial activities and to provide a variety of housing types to satisfy individual preferences and financial capabilities. SUBD. 2. USES PERMITTED. a) Multiple family dwellings. . b) Library, public and private schools, and similar uses of a public service nature. c) Accessory uses incidental to the foregoing principle uses including, but not limited to, garages, and recreational facilities. d) Home Occupations in accordance with Section 10.12, Subd. 2. e) Planned Residential Developments in accordance with Section 10.14, Subd. 2 f) Commercial activities a re permitted but limited to the first floor of the buildinQ.¡ and shall not exceed 50 percent of the entire structure. Sec. 10.16, Subd. 2 (e) was approved on 10/21/02 SUBD. 3. USES BY SPECIAL PERMIT. a) Multiple family dwellings greater than 40 feet in height as measured by the Uniform Building Code. b) Neighborhood Commercial subject to the site plan review requirements of Section 10.27. sueD. 5. BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN 8Qprovals Qranted throuQh buildinÇLPermit. site plan. special use permit. or planned residential development shall require conformance with the OriQinal HastinQs DesiQfl Guidelines as adopted by the City Council. SECTION 10.20A. C-3 COMMUNITY-REGIONAL COMMERCE. (Section unchanged, except for numbering) SECTION 10.20B. DC Downtown Core District SUBD. 1. INTENT. The intent of the Downtown Core District is to create a vibrant mixed -use core with an aesthetic character that is distinctly different than other areas of the community and mix of uses arranaed in a manner that encoura~edestrian movement and accessibility. The Downtown Core District focuses on the vertical intearation of uses requirinq certain uses to inteQrate residential housinQ above street level businesses. These hjgh density residential developments have historically - T contributed too the life-cycle housinQ mix available in and around the downtown. Maintaining historical residential housinq densities is also a contributor to downtown commerce and street level activity. Maintaininq the historic distribution of business and density of housinQ is essential to protect municipal and private investment. Planninq efforts to secure a transit center in the downtown will further the objectives maintaining and enhancinÇLgßedestrian scale core. Careful desiqn of buildin9§.&..Public, and private §Paces is also a primary focus in the Downtown Core District which shall be Quided bv the Oriqinal Hastinqs Desiqn Guidelines as adopted by the City Council. The quidelines establish desiQn criteria for buildinQ fronts that are bases on street tv~ sueD. 2. USES PERMITTED. a) Commercial retail and service establishments that have floor areas of less than 15,000 square feet on any sinQle level includinq, but not limited to, the followin(t. (1) Retail and service establishments excludinq automobile rel2.êJL. (2) Offices. ~ (3) Entertainment and amusement services. (4) Lodglng services includinQ hotel and motel. b) Public and semi-public buildin~ c) frivate Clubs. d) Residential dwellinQ§,provided they are located above the first floor level. e) Automobile parking lots subject to followinq conditions: (1) ParkinQ lots shall not have frontaqe or driveway access points on streets with an east\west orientation, if an alternate access to the Q[Qpertv is available. (2) Parkina lots may front on street with a north\south orientation when a landscape buffer is provided along the perimeter of the parkina areas in accordance with Sect. 10.09. (3) Every attempt shall be made to locate parking lots internally within a block to allow buildinQ to front on street corridors. (4) ExistinQ alleys should be utilized whenever practical to facilitate orderly access and use of land. f) Churches g) Accessory uses incidental to the foreaQillg,principal uses. SUBD. 3. USES BY SPECIAL PERMIT. a) Outdoor patio areas for entertainment. dininQ, and recreational activities - b) Small animal clinics, excludinQ establishments with outside runs and non-patient overnight boardinQ:. c) Towers as reaulated bv Section 10.05 Subd. 12 of this cha~ d) Residential dwellinQs on the first floor level provided the dwellinQ is accessory to a commercial use, less than 50% of the first level floor area and is located in the rear of the buildinq with a separate outside entrance. --¡ SUBD. 4. BULK STANDARDS 22 feet 80 feet 47 feet 14 dwellinq units per acre a) Minimum Lot Width b) Minimum Lot Depth c) Maximum Buildinq HeiQht d) Minimum Residential Densitv e) Minimum Floor Area Ratio for Non-Residential Uses (verticallv mixed buildinq§) 1.5 SUBD. 5. BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN ßQprovals granted throuqh buildinQ....Permit. site plan, special use permit. or planned residential development shall require conformance with the Oriqinal Hastinqs Desiqil Guidelines as adopted bY the City Council. SECTION 10.25A. PI - PUBLIC INSTITUTION. - (Section unchanged, except for numbering) SECTION 10.25B. VSO - VERMILLION STREET OVERLAY DISTRICT. SUBD.1. INTENT. The intent of the Vermillion Street Overlay District is to preserve the character of existinq residential and reliQious buildinqs while allowinq conversions of their use to accommodate residential.. institutional. and commercial activities. Preservation of buildinq and site character elements are critical to ensure this corridor maintains its vitality. and traditional character. Conversions of structures to uses other than the oriqinal are based on performance criteria as defined in this section. This District recoqnizes that because each buildinQ and site has its own unique design characteristics. some structures will have greater conversion potential than others. SUBD. 2. USES PERMITTED 8!!..Permitted uses identified in the underlvinq zoninq district shall be permitted uses in the VSO District. SUBD. 3. USES BY SPECIAL PERMIT All uses bv special permit identified in the underlvinq zoninQ district shall be uses bv §.Decial permit in the VSO District in addition to the followin~ a) Commercial activities in residential buildinqs. Use conversion shall meet all rn.guirements of the adopted BuildinQ Code. b) Commercial activities in buildin9§....Previouslv used for institutional or reliQious purposes. c) Professional Offices in Residential Districts. d) Mixed residential use of commercial structures. T' Limited disruption or change to the inherent character of the building, site, and corridor shall be predominant criteria in determininQÆQ,Proval of a special use permit in the VSO District. SUBD. 4. USES PROHIBITED The foliowinQ uses shall be prohibited in the VSO District: a) Assemblv. storage. and manufacturinQ activities. b) Outside sales SUBD. 5. SITE PLAN REVIEW Any buildinQ site construction or alteration shall be subiect to the Site Plan Review Procedure as stipulated in Section 10.27 (as amended). In addition to the requirements of Section 10.27. review of site plans within the VSO District shall be subject to the following~ a) The existina buildinQ and site character shall be maintained consistent with the Qrjginal HastinQs DesiQn Guidelines. as adopted bv the CitvCouncii. b) ~e shall meet the requirements of ~- T SECTION 10.26. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOT REGULATIONS. I is unlawful to erect or alter any building within the City unless the following minimum lot and yard areas are provided and maintained in connection with such building. DISTRICT A R-l R-2.. NC & R-3 R-4 R-S- RMU R-6 OSR MINIMUM LOT AREA 10 9000 7000-one 5000 2500 áQO 2500 acres other* 9700-two 12 d.u. other * per acre WIDTH AT 150 75 50-one SETBACK 66-two FRONT 20 20 20 20 20 5 15 INTERIOR 10 10 7 7 1/2bldg. 1/4bldg. 5 SIDE-b height height-g CORNER 10 10 10 10 10 5 10 SIDE-c & d REAR-b & d 20 20 20 20 20 1/2bldg. 5 height-g HEIGHT 25-e 25-e 25-e 25-e 25-e 40-f 25-e * Minimum lot area requirements for other uses and all other districts not listed above shall be determined by the City during site plan review. The Community Development Director may, at her/his discretion, determine setbacks for accessory structures. FOOTNOTES: a. Where adjacent structures have front yard setbacks different from those required, the minimum front yard setback shall be the average setback of such structures, but in no case shall the front yard setback be less than 1 a feet. b. In the R-1 District, an accessory structure (garage, shed, open deck, etc.) shall be - no closer than five feet to the rear or adjacent interior side lot line. c. In the R-2 District, an accessory structure (garage, shed, open deck, etc.) shall be no closer than five feet to the rear or adjacent interior side lot line. d. Garages facing the street/alley R. O. W. shall be setback at least 20 feet. e. Buildings over 25 feet in height shall require one-half (1/2) foot additional setback for each additional one foot of building height on the required minimum side yard. f. Except as allowed by Section 10.15, Subd. 3. g. The maximum setback required shall be 15 feet but in no case less than five feet. -- T """""""'""""""""""".,..,^"",."".",....",..,"^""""""",'"','"",'..,.."""""""'~""""""",,,, "."""..,.n~.-'-"""-""-""""""",..""""""."","""-""""""""""""""""""""""-""""""""""..','",""","."',",.",',',".:'L""","""'U~M_'-_~-U4""""""~."",;:,""',:\.',.".:\""""""",-,,',I",,"U ALL OTHER SECTIONS SHALL REMAIN UNCHANGED ADOPTED by the Hastings City Council on this day of 2003. Michael D. Werner, Mayor ATTEST: Melanie Mesko Lee, Administrative Assistant! City Clerk Document Drafted By: City of Hastings (JWH) 1 01 East 4th Street Hastings, Minnesota 55033 ,_. T' ::;.~"."':,.,\::.,'""""....,,,,'."...::,' :";";,:,'"X"":"':'\"."""'\"'.h',",.,',,"',,",~,,,,""'~""""""""'" ',',"','.",""""-"""""",,, ----- .-,-_..... .... 2 3. Hastings City Code, Chapter 11, Section 11.100 states "A minor subdivision is generally not intended for outlots nor commercial\industriallands." Upon vote taken: Ayes: 3 (Alongi, Greil, Hollenbeck), Nays: 0, Abstentions (Truax). Motion passed. Twedt Arrived 4. City of Hastings - City Code Amendment #2003-38 - Chapter 10 (Various Sections) - Downtown Master Plan. Director Hinzman provided a summary of the proposed changes to the language since the last meeting. He also gave background information on the process - that changes to the language of the code would be considered first. Only upon Council adoption of language changes, would rezoning of property be considered. Commissioners discussed the following changes to the draft: Accessory Buildings and Structures - allow sidewalls in excess of 10 feet regardless of whether a residential unit is located above the structure or not. Commissioners sought a revision that ensured the overall height and design of the building were compatible to the house. Residential Mixed Use District - Allow commercial activities on the entire first floor of the structure, but not more than 50 percent of the structure. Vice-Chairman Greil opened the public hearing at 7:22 pm. Greg Schmitt, 109 Bass Street - Suggested limiting garage door heights as a way to limit accessory structure heights. Had concerns about the OSR district designation for East Hastings, would it lead to greater density than is there at present? Director Hinzman stated that the OSR district would allow for clustering of units, which could exceed the existing limit of a two unit dwelling, provided open space and green space is provided to ensure the density would not exceed 3.0 units per acre (the existing R-2 density limit). Ryan Berg, 703 East 2nd Street - Had concerns about greater density in East Hastings, and the potential for low income residences. Clarence Chapman, 614 East 3rd Street - Questioned the movement of the greenway from along the railroad tracks adjacent to downtown, further east to link Lake Isabel Park and the . Mississippi River. He also questioned how the zoning changes would affect additions to homes. Director Hinzman stated that the greenway along that the Lake Isabel greenway was in addition to the one along the railroad. Pastor, Our Saviour's Church, 400 West 9th Street - Questioned how the changes would affect the ability of the church to expand - would existing structures be protected. Director Hinzman stated the new ordinance speaks to building standards, not protection of older properties. - r ".<,.,,_,,"'"h"'"'""'"".,"" " ""'""h""' "--u"--'--'----""'"'"'""-""'-'"""'"'"'"'--" "" -n__,"_"",""' "," 3 Cyndi Mollick, 623 East 1 st Street - Her property is designated as park land in the Downtown Master Plan - would she be allowed to construct an addition, or would the city condemn her property . Director Hinzman stated the OSR district would allow for both single and two family structures to be constructed. Further research would need to be done on the affects before any rezonings to evaluate the consequences. James Fowlkes, 312 West 2nd Street - Questioned how his property would be designated in the future. Ryan Berg - Doesn't understand the need for additional park land. He is concerned that the property owners of East Hastings will be burdened by this plan - they like things they way they are now. Commissioner Twedt stated the intent of the changes seems OK, but the application appears to be muddy. Commissioner Alongi stated if their were other ways to obtain green space other than the plan - he questions the value of the OSR district on East Hastings. Cathy Maynard, 920 Vermillion Street - Asked if the Schoolhouse Square project would be affected by the changes. Director Hinzman stated that the Schoolhouse Square property is within the Master Plan District, and would be subject to the plan. Public Hearing was closed at 8:35pm Planning Commission Action: Commissioner Hollenbeck moved and Commissioner Alongi seconded a motion to table the proposed zoning changes until the next Planning Commission meeting to allow staff to incorporate changes discussed at the meeting. Upon vote taken: Ayes: 5 (Alongi, Greil, Hollenbeck, Truax, Twedt), Nays: O. Motion passed. 5. Other Business Director Hinzman provided an update of City Council actions and upcoming planning items. , Adjournment With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 8:47pm. Respectfully submitted, John Hinzman Recording Secretary - T .. ...................... ........'............- ..... ",---""",-,-""""""",,~~.'.' ... ..'....~.. ...................,.. ...........-..,........ .... . ,.." .. ... .. . .. .... .." . ""'.""""""""""""" '.on"" "--'_"'_"...o"'--'--_'_--'-_'_-_'_'_------'_"_"~"'_"'" Q) ~ ~ M <=> <=> ~ ...... ...... -- \0 ...... ~ 0 ...... ~~"""~""""""".'.""'" -!' .' t'{1" . . ,¿~ ., ~."."'.'...'."'..'. ... !\ ..'.. ",'" .;~ .'j,\ .. ~ .;...,.."., " Ik'" ,. .,~ .\ ...... .', ,. .~ ,.,., 0 e:: ] p... 0 N ';t( t 1;) ~ <=> N ~ O~ 0 ~ 0 e rn :Ë ~ ~ rn ::s ~ rñ .Sf ] .~ C,) I -- . . ~ .:d T Recommended city code revisions The Zoning Code revisions address the following: This section provides a review of Zoning, Critical Area, and Shoreland Management Chapters of the City Code, suggesting revisions ne~ded to implement the Land Use Map and the Original Hastings Design Guidelines. The intent of these recommendations is to offer ways to work within the existing City Code, without overhauling or rewriting substantial portions of it. The uniqueness of the Design Guidelines creates the need for new approaches to zoning implementation. New and adapted zoning districts are proposed to the Zoning Regulations that are necessary to provide the consistency with the Land Use Map. The recommendations are structured in a manner that they may be transferred directly into ordinance language. As a tool for City Staff, it does not necessarily provide a large amount of background detail the proposed changes. Therefore, review of the proposed changes with. the Planning Commission and City Council may require some additional insight as Staff feels may be necessary. Recommended revisions to chapter 10 ... zoning i i ! i ! The Zoning Code is the primary means of implementing many of the land use aspects of the Design Guidelines. . Recommended revisions are needed in a number of areas in the code including districts, parking, and review process s~ctions. The majority of these revisions are needed in the zoning districts section to subsections such as intent statements, use charts, and bulk standards. j i ¡ i : I i ! 1. Modifying those existing zoning districts where llÚnimal changes are needed. 2.Create new res~dential zoning districts to distinguish them from others in the community. 3. Develop bulk standards to respect historical platting and development character of the downtown area. 4. Require llÚnimum densities of certain multi,family residential projects. 5. Necessary references to the Design Guidelines. The proposed revisions are indicated on the following pages by section in a table format. The first column in the table identifies the subdivision within each Section proposed for revision. The second column identifies the proposed text in bold. \ Code Modifications >- CM . 1 i ¡ i í I L f Improving on the Original 1-"",- l ..~ AAa1b'1he . Jmt d RJsti~ Úre&t~';i;¡~~'d6\i¡,ittô~ a¡~íi4~t bÃ~ed öõ'SÈctiQN 10:20. Òj,t~aiiffißült~Iij.egfti;¡il CbmÎij~ii:g;/JjiitHd wbtiiiJ bê'iliÜièd tÍl~ ù¡)OWNTOWN cditt tjISt¡ijtTS;äñtib~ ~ê~iihite t-:-ó1i1 ,tG~n'~tMg ,c~j ö~itièt aÎóíÌg VèHriiíiíó~ str~L '., t '~" 'c,:"':, ., 'c. .. -'."",":ì$."".;,"'-:':. ' , ..'".,'., c.). . . . " c' c ". 8. b. SECTION Rename Ihe C-3 District: Rewrile the inlent statemenl as follows: c:.. Modify Ihe U!!e 1i!!1s as follows: . PROPOSED REVISION (IN BOLD SECTION 10.xx. DC - DOWNTOWN CORE DISTRICT. SUBD: I. INTENT. Tlie intent or the Downtown Core District is 10 create a vibranl mixed-use core with an aeslhetic chaucter that Is distinctly different Ihan other areas of the community and mix of uses arranged in a manner th.t encourages pedes Irian movement Rnd accessibility. The Downtown Core District focuses on the vertical integration of uses requiring certain uses 10 inlegrate residential housing above street level bu!!lnesses. These high density residential developments have hi!!torically contributed to the life-qc:le housing mix available in and around Ihe downtown. Maintaining hlslorical residential housing densilies Is also a contrlbulor to downtown commerce and street level ac:tlvlty. Maintaining the historic dl!!tribution of businesses and density of housing Is essential to protect municipal and private Investment. Planning errort5 to !!ecure a transit center In the downtown will further the objecllves maintaining and enhancing a pedestrian scale core. Careful design of buildings, public and private spaces Is also a primary focus in the Downtown Core Distric:t which shall be guided by the Original Hastings Design Guidelines. The guidelines eslablish design criteria for building fronts that are based on the street type. SUBD. 2. USES PERMITTED. a. Commercial retail and service establishments that have noor areas of less than 15,000 square feet on any single level including, but not limited to, the following:... Automobile parking lots with the following conditions: I. Parking lob shall not have frontage or driveway access points on street5 with an east/west orienlation. 2. Parking 1015 may front on streets with a north/south orientation when a landscape buffer is provided along the perimeter of the parking area. 3. Every attempt should be nude to locate parking lots internally within a block to allow buildings to front on street corridors. 4. Existing alleys should be utilized whenever practical to facilitate orderly access and use orland. e. SUBD. 3. USES BY SPECIAL PERMIT. a. Automobile service stations and motor vehicle repair and wash. (Delete this itemle. Towers as regulated by Section 10.05 Subd. 12 of this chapter. IDelete this item) Outdoor patio areas for entertainment, dining, and recreational activities. d. SECTION PROPOSED REVISION (IN BOLD) a. Create District Lot SUBD. 4. BULK STANDARœ. Regulations as follows: Minimum Lot Size: none Minimum Lot Width: 22 feet Minimum Lot Depth: 80 feet Maximum Building Height: 47 feet (height of the Finch Building) or 4 stories Minimum Residential Density: 14 dwelling units per acre Minimum Floor Area RAtio for non-residential uses/vertiCAlly mixed buildings: 1.5 Building setbacks: no requirement but based on Design Guidelines b. Create a tie to the Design SUBD.5. BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN. Approvals granted Standards by so noting In through Building Permit, Sile Plan, Conditional Use Permit or a new subdivision: Planned Residential Development processes shall require conformance with the Original Hastings Design Guidelines. {ode Modifications >- l j l I.' ¡ ~ ~ . r , I Improving on the Original AAalb'the JmtdK1sti~ CM.2 \ ¡ ,., , ":'," !¡' Code Modifications t, :i{~'~~ ~¡;: iìöd ' ',' ,teVisè, ŠEè~ ~N,;'{~!L ,~3~;~~W~[w~~§~W~~,~~¡¡ji¡'ik ':~~iWfJ:t~ 'd1tÊsíôËNìtALM' IXED US' Dl'striH:'~.T"'H"ê':""":,., """,""'1" ,.,~),:.' ,""'L"h:.:.',, "',~:",/~,;.:"", ': :M.,,'>t..' ", ;. E " 1U;-\,,"' .'\:;~:¡;f~/';:!'>"':">:':'" ',:"' ,"'" f~. ,J':,>:;~"<":;~':11t';:¡';;i~t~,~~:¡t:::l"..t£"~~1;~:~:~~~¡;lt "¡'i\ . ~I , i~ a. SECTION Rename the R-5 District: b. Rewrite the intent statement as follows: . c' t 1 f iJo, !, c. Modify District Lot Regulations as follows: .. L [Y., d. Create a tie to the Design Standards by so noting in a new subdivision: . ' ,i .. . PROPOSED REVISION (IN BOLD SECTION 10.16. RMU - RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE DISTRICT. SUBD: 1. INTENT. The intent of the RMU District is to encourage the development of higher density multiple family dwellings and limited commercial activities adjacent to the downtown area to support the activities in the Core District, to serve as a transitional district from commercial to lower density residential districts, provide an area for restricted commercial activities and to provide a variety of housing types to satisfy individual preferences and financial capabilities. SECTION 10.26. DISTRICT LOT REGULATIONS. Minimum Residential for multifamily Density: 12 dwelling units per acre Commercial activities are limited ,to 25 percent of the gross Door area with any project. SUBD. 4. BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN. Approvals granted through Building Permit, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit or Planned Residential Development processes shall require conformance with the Original Hastings Design Guidelines. \ ... improving on the Original AJmb-1he I-mtdl-bstl~ CM.3 Code Modifications " ~ j ŒWÎ~~~ ~h ~ ~,~~:,~:~~~~~~*" SÐ:nrn ~ REvIsIrn INOCW 1. Create a new JJstrid for the single-fanily SECI1<N IO.xx. R-xNElGHIQUDJDUl'SERVAlICNIXSIRICf. area 511000 as Neiglbl"bood Omervatim IIstrict by ampmg the existing &2 mtrict: 2. Create a new intmt sblterœnt as follcMS: 3. Mxify &2 üe Gmt by adIng: 4. G-eate Wl<lng am ~ IØgn sediœ to tie to the Jkcii~ ~dmls by so niing in a new StbIvisim: 1 ,¡ " 1 :, :J ~ " .í " .' SLBD. l. 1NIENf. The bUnt of the Neighborl1ood COOsemdim Dstrict is to provide stmdmJs tbat pttect the resideWal d1arader of q~ranily areæ sunwrdng the mootomJ. 11is Dstrid is intmŒd to provide regula6œfi that pUilkAe todtimal neighIxJrùxxI œsq,¡. Residential ~ sunwrdng tbe mmt<Ml1 incorporate nmy tndtimal neighborbood ~ features sW1 as alleys, ~ hcmes, ftmt prches, period sensitive Inång design, am tndtimal *M ~ ~ and enhaŒing tndtimal nešgIfumod dl'sign is tlJe gool of tis Dstrid. SlBD. 2 lEES ÆRMTIID: a. AaeæoIy living ~ mth tlJe aDSideratim of ~ ßRÜcaUe code sedims SUBIl 4. BUIlIING AND SITE DEi Œ a. A¡puvaIs grmted tbrœgh ~ Plan, OnI6œal üe Ptmit or Planned Rtsidential ~ ~ shall reqW-e cmf\JIIIÜlIœ Wth tlJe Oiginal HtstitQ; I8gn ill drJines. h The NeigIinbood Cbmervafim Dstrict illdelines shall wy to alIJanœ Wthin tis ~ as ~ by the PIanDng <::bnnmiœ. M cmtained in the Gddelines, item; for miew indŒle Wt are Jrt ~ linitedto: str'ŒCscape; site design; am IIIIidIE mraI!\5 and ~ JDldœs: am new amstna:tkn ~ ... CM.4 ;, Improving on the Original I A AéI1 it f1e .~ tmt rt RIs1I~ ,. Code Modifications SECTION a. Create a new District for tIle single-family area shown as Open Space Redevelopment by adapting the existing R-2 district: b. Create a new Intent statement as follows: c. Modify Use Chart: d. Create Building and Site Design section to tie to the Design Standards by so noting in a new subdivision: ,', PROPOSED REVISION (IN BOLD SECTION lO.xx. OSR - OPEN SPACE REDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. SUBD. 1. INTENT. The intent of the Open Space Redevelopment District is to provide standards that allow existing single and two family patterns to continue; but anticipate larger scale redevelopment of areas that may be the result of public improvement projects such as commuter rail, street systems and storm water treatment facilities. Attached housing areas that result from redevelopment should be designed in a manner to connect op,en spaces to adjacent reenway/preserve areas along Lake Isabel. SUBD. 2. USES PERMITTED: a. Existing single and two family dwellings. b. Single and multiple family dwellings when developed as a Planned Residential Development subject to... [Sèction 10.27] and [Chapter 1 1].... SUBD. 4. BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN. 1. Approvals granted through Building Permit, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permit or Planned Residential Development processes shall require conformance with the Original Hastings Design Guidelines. 2. Driveways shall only be allowed from alleys except for corner lots which may have separate driveway access. No new drivewav shall be located in a front or side vard. " .. :¡ CM.5 ..1n1JIUVIn, ' g on the Original " AAmb"f1e : ,'Jmt d 1tI5ti~ . .,. .. ,. .-...,"" -. .......,". ~""'_,~~~-~-,-.. . ',' -",-.-' -.- -,.-- ,-_no'"~ Code Modifications Crute an Overlay District to address the Vermillion Street corridor Associated Standards Performance 'r ~ ; ,. ;. Intent. The intent of the Vermillion Street Overlay District is to preserve the character of existing residential and religious buildings while allowing conversions of their use to accommodate residential, institutional, and commercial activities. Preservation of building and site character elements are critical to ensure this corridor .maintains its vitality. Conversion of structures to uses other than the original is based on performance criteria as defined in this section. This District recognizes that because each building and site has its own unique design characteristics, some structures will have greater conversion potential than others. Review use conversions as Conditionally Permitted Uses (CUP) when the inherent character of the building, site and corridor is not disrupted: a. " . Commercial activities in residential buildings provided that less than 2000 square feet of noor area is dedicated to such activity. Use conversion shall be acceptable to all building code issues as determined by the Building Official. b. Commercial activities in religious buildings. c. Professional Offices. d. Mixed Residential use of commercial structures. Prohibit: 1. Assembly, storage and manufacturing activities. 2. Outside sales. Building Architecture: The existing building character shall be maintained consistent with the Original Hastings Design Guidelines. Parking: 3. Parking shall comply with requirements as stated in Subd. 7 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements. Sign age (make a reference to the following provisions to be added to Section 10.08 Sign Code): 4. One sign per business not larger than 4 square feet that may be a wall or freestanding sign for residential buildings. 5. One sign per business not larger than 40 square feet that may be a wall of freestanding sign for converted religious buildings. 6. Freestanding signs are limited to 6 feet in height and shall be setback a minimum of 10 feet from front and side lot lines. 7. No internal illuminated shms are allowed. CM.6 / ~b¡JpmvIn, g on the Original , ' , ,A Aa1 ir the ~. - tmt d KisII~ ot'. , ,'" '..i-= ,', ". - _._.,--_.~._. Code Modifications Êxistiiìg Section 10.09 ParkingaíidJH~di~if~~qûitêfu~Üfš' ,,:"',.. " ': L ..,',', ,',"," "",; "",,' ,t'". .. , ." ,,"""""'..""; ;'.,~, ..' SECTION Subd. 7 Minimum and Maximum Off-Street Parking Requirements - Table 10.09-3 PROPOSED REVISION (IN BOLD Parking requirements for uses located in the Downtown Core and Residential Mixed-Use Districts shall be determined by a proof of parking study. When a study is required, the Urban Land Institute's 1983 publication, Shared Parking Standards, the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Shared Parking Standards Planning Guidelines (1995), or equivalent shall be used to determine the number of spaces needed for a use or shared between uses. " j. i I I I ì I i I I I i I I ¡ j , ¡ j , ¡ j I ¡ I ] 1 ~ , Æ j Î j ~ " 1 [ CM.7 >" Other Zoning Code items for further Staff review: . Accessory Living Quarters - The. Plan recommends modifying the zoning code for single~ fal1Úly zoned areas to allow accessory structures designed and used as residential living units. Accessory Living Quarters can offer increasingly important 1ifestyle options (own/rent, maintenance/ maintenance~free) within a single~family lot. Traditional Neighborhood Design (TND) codes often haveidetailed criteria for this situation that could act as precedents for Hastings. in detemúning specific code modifications that will work for Hastings, City staff may want to consider treating requirements for accessory living quarters such as setbacks and height restrictions differently than either principal structures or other accessory structures (garages). Locally, the City of Chaska recently adopted accessory living quarters regulations that are recognized as successful in addressing zoning and building code issues" for accessory living quarters. . Residential Structure Bulk/Mass - Although the allowable building area on a lot is guided by yard setbacks, building out to the maximum. amount may give a property the appearance that it is overbuilt. There are a couple of approaches the City may wish to consider. A maximum impervious surface limit would control the amount of building and other hardsurface area. This is typically used as a surface - , .; ", Improving on the Original " AAa1b'the ~L Jmt d .bciti~ > (òde Modifications water management technique but would also control building mass. Another approach would be to limit the foundation size of principal and accessory structures. Although either approach would prevent overbuilding, further analysis of existing conditions is needed to understand what currently exists. . Landscaping Provisions - As areas of the Downtown area redevelop, the opportunity to enhance building character with landscaping should not be overlooked. Each of the Districts has its own character and landscaping standards should be developed to help accentuate each project. More than just typical type, caliper and number provisions should be considered in drafting new provisions. . Lighting - The parking provisions discuss lighting of parking areas, but not in great detail. Parking lot lighting often involves balancing the need to provide adequate lighting to ensure personal security with the concerns of neighboring property owners about glare and overlighting. The use of unnecessarily high wattage lights can actually lead to a less secure environment, by creating very dark pockets just outside the range of the lights. Lighting is an especially important concern when commercial projects adjoin residential areas - and when very tall lighting poles are proposed to be used. While taller poles can illuminate larger areas they are more likely to cause light to spill over onto adjacent properties. Low~angle cutoff light fixtures can be " ~ CM.8 , Code Modifications used to better direct the light to those areas where it is needed, minimizing glare, spillover effects and light pollution. . . Fencing/Screening - In some areas in the core, fencing may be appropriate. Other areas like the Open Space Redevelopment District may not be enhanced with fencing unless properly designed or designed in conjunction with landscaping provisions. . Green Buildings and Site Design - Use LEED (leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) or other comparable ratings, Buildings with approaches to save energy could receive flexibility in other code areas. . Stormwater Credits - By reducing the amount of surface water on a site, credits cold be gained and used for other items. " ~ Recommended revisions to Chapter 16 ". S h.oreland Management Ordinance The City's Shoreland Management Ordinance regulates some of the land area within the Downtown Master Plan area. More specifically, those lands within 300 feet of the Mississippi River and 1000 feet of Lake Isabel. ,; :, The Shoreland Management revisions address the following: .i ~ c! L The need for flexibility for with in the Downtown to address the existing built conditions. CM.9 Improving on the Original A f1æ fa- f1e ..1. t-mt d t-m1I~ VIII-B-5 June 11, 2003 TO: The Honorable Mayor and Council Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority FROM: John Grossman lIRA Director RE: Request for Proposals - Riverfront Redevelopment The attached draft request for proposals has been prepared by Jim Prosser and Jessica Cook of Ehlers Assoc. incorporating comments and additions from Bruce Chamberlain ofHKGI. Your comments from the joint meeting of May 27 have been considered and when possible incorporated in this language. Ehlers will present the draft at the meeting. Additional comments or directions you may have can be incorporated in the fmal draft. It will be proofed for typos and other errors. The properties to be included in the RFP are shown on the enclosed maps. The Zoning Code and Design Guidelines attachments are not enclosed. The attached process update shows completed and future steps. The proposed schedule: Release RFP Pre-proposal conference Proposals due Review and interview Developer selection June 23 Week of July 7 July 30 August September As the first step in the communication plan, a neighborhood meeting, including property owners, is proposed for June 25. The need for, goals, schedule and competitive nature of the redevelopment process would be covered. Another neighborhood meeting could be scheduled after proposals are received. Recommendation: Authorize the publication and distribution of the RFP (with additions or revisions if any). ---r Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. mil æo MEMO Date: June 11, 2003 To: John Grossman, Hastings HRA Director cc: Jessica Cook, Ehlers & Associates From: Bruce Chamberlain Planning Consultant Re: Developer RFP. Enclosed are my comments and additions to the developer RFP. My comments focus on expressing the community's vision for the Heart of Hastings through the RFP text and helping the readers begin to embrace that vision. I believe the Design Guidelines, code modifications, Levee Park Plan and Plan for the Heart of Hastings will provide developers with a great deal of important detail so you will see that the RFP text tries to identify the basic critical points that the City wants to express but also makes strong reference to the other documents. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. M: IHASTINGSI/evee redeve/opmentlRFP comment memo.doc 123 North Third Street, Suite 100, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Ph (612) 338.0800 Fx (612) 338.6838 - T I. Introd uction . Hastings, Minnesota is a vibrant, historic river town in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area. This charming community is oriented along the shores of the Mississippi River, just twenty minutes from downtown 81. Paul, and 40 minutes from downtown Minneapolis. The City offers a traditional main street, tree-lined Victorian neighborhoods, beautiful scenery plus the diverse amenities of a city. The Mississippi River park and trail system is just footsteps away from an array of stores and restaurants. We proudly welcome and encourage you to visit our website at ci.hastings.mn.us. The City of Hastings and its is Housing and Redevlopment Authority (HRA) are initiating the redevelopment of its downtown in order to retain its small town charm and historic downtown features, while providing a business and shopping environment which will draw visitors and appeal to its growing cosmopolitan population. This is the mission of Improving on the Original: A Plan for the Heart of Hastings, a program undertaken to reawaken the spirit and vibrance of downtown. The vision for the Heart of Hastings is to be an inspiring, vital, and stable community always striving to protect its rivertown history, deepen its traditional character, and enhance its environment. There are three general areas the City/HRA are considering for redevelopment for this RFP. They include the Levee Area and the Historic Depot Block within the downtown core. This redevelopment will expand the viable, existing downtown core. The Plan for the Heart of Hastings calls for reoriented, newly designed, and attractive structures, which will maintain an individual identity, yet complement the historic architectural theme. To assist you with this proposal, the HRA has scheduled a Pre-Proposal Conference for: ,2003 at Hastings City Hall 1014tb Street East 651-437-4127 The Goals of the redevelopment are to: 1. Assure long term viability of the historic downtown area. . Provide uses that complement and support existing businesses. . Provide new uses that draw people to the downtown area via land and river. . Create structures that complement the historic character of downtown. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP Page 1 -- T 2. Connect downtown Hastings to the Mississippi river. . Maintain and enhance public access to and recreational use of the river. . Coordinate redevelopment with the Master Plan for Original Hastings, which calls for a continuous open space link along the Mississippi River between Lock and Dam #2 and the Hastings Marina. 3. Enhance downtown as focus of the community's historic, river-town identity. 4. Enhance stability of adjacent residential neighborhoods. 5. Replace obsolete land uses in the downtown area. The City is seeking a creative, qualified developer to acquire privately held sites and develop the targeted area with a mixture of retail, housing types, and/or restaurant and hospitality uses. .:. The intent of the redevelopment is to increase the intensity of commercial activity in downtown Hastings and enhance access to and enjoyment of the Mississippi River by the general public. Therefore, some retail use along the main street is strongly encouraged. .:. Three parcels are currently used as ftee public parking lots. Replacement of public parking will be key in maintaining a commercially viable downtown and public access to the River. .:. Some of the existing structures that have historic character may be rehabilitated as part of the redevelopment. .:. The City is open to consideration of proposals that address anyone of the three sites or proposals that provide a team approach to redevelopment. At this time, the City will not consider developing a portion of one site without a comprehensive plan for improvmg the whole site. The City expects the private development firm to incorporate and support the principles demonstrated by the Plan -for the Heart of Hastings (copy is enclosed/available). In turn, the City is committed to a public/private partnership -and win/win relationship. The City has been plamring and preparing for redevelopment for several years. The Hastings HRA has already acquired and cleared 5.08 acres of the 7.12 acre sites. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP Page 2 -- T II. Description of Sites .:. Location There are three general areas the City is considering for redevelopment through this RFP. They include the Levee Area and the Historic Depot Block within the downtown core and the 4th Street Site two blocks south of the downtown core. Levee Area The Levee redevelopment area consists of2Y'2 city blocks that are oriented to 2nd Street (historic main street) and/or the Mississippi River. The Levee redevelopment area is adjacent to a National Register Historic District but not within it. This redevelopment area contains roughly 4.9 acres of potentially developable land. North half of Block 3 is oriented to the Mississippi River and is bounded by Sibley and Ramsey Streets, Character Lane and Levee Park. The area is owned by the City. The site is currently used for public parking (roughly 85 stalls), which is seen as critical to the downtown area not only for the capacity it provides but also for its strategic location near the center of the downtown district. Redevelopment proposals should suggest how convenient, public parking will be accommodated within the proposal. Block 2 is bounded by Ramsey and Tyler Streets, 2nd Street and Levee Park. The City owns what is roughly the NE quarter of this block with the remainder owned by four parties, all of whom have expressed an interest in selling. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP Page 3 -- r The north half of the block contains a brick house, an out-building and some stone ruins (all under one private owner). The site does not have official historic designation. The house has some architectural interest although its structural integrity is in question. First Street (unimproved) extends along the north perimeter of the block and currently provides river-view parking valued by the community. The south half of the block contains three privately held properties housing active businesses. We believe the buildings are structurally adequate in their current form but contain little architectural interest. Block 1 is bounded by Tyler Street and the Railroad line, 2nd Street and 1 st Street. The City owns the full block. The north half of this block is vacant. The south half of the block contains 65 spaces of public parking. The bulk of this parking accommodates the businesses on Block 2. HistoriC Depot Block The Historic Depot Block (Block 16) consists of roughly 1.8 acres and is slightly less than a full city block. The block is located between Tyler Street and the rail line, 2nd Street and 3rd Street. The site is fully owned by the HRA. The depot itself is sandwiched between the rail mainline and a spur line, all ... of which are owned by C.P. Rail at the eastern edge of the site. The Plan for the Heart of Hastings suggests that the Historic Depot Site is the best location for a commuter rail transit station if and when the Red Rock commuter rail line becomes a reality. To facilitate the flexibility needed for station design, the City intends to hold the block open (undeveloped) up to five years in order to let the commuter rail debate run its course. In the meantime, the City would like to see some aesthetic improvements made to the block as part of the Levee area redevelopment and is open to using, on an interim basis, some portion of the block for uses such as short-term parking, farmers market, etc. that could help support successful redevelopment of the Levee area. Ideally, early investments made to the property could be done in a way that allows their continued use once full redevelopment occurs (we also recognize the difficulty in this prediction). At this time, the City will not consider subdividing the Historic Depot Block, and will keep the site in public ownership. 4th Street Site The 4th Street Site is 0.55 acres on the southwest comer of the intersection of 4th Street East and Sibley Street. The site is owned by the Hastings HRA. On the western parcel of this site stands a historic home. The HRA would encourage the rehabilitation of this home to preserve its historic character. It is anticipated that the remainder of the site would be cleared for new housing development. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP Page 4 ..-r .:. Zoning All three of the sites are currently zoned C-3. However, the City is in the process of rezoning downtown including the Levee area and historic depot block to "Core Multi-Use District" and the area surrounding downtown including the 4th Street site to "Residential Mixed-Use District". The City is making these zoning changes to support the community's vision of celebrating the broader downtown neighborhood as a vibrant, walkable town center that contains a mix of uses, attractions and living options. The proposed zoning ordinance is attached. Final adoption of a new zoning ordinance is anticipated by .:. Design Considerations Part of the strategy in strengthening downtown Hastings is to diversify the reasons people use it. The City is focusing on weaving recreational opportunities into the downtown by improving pedestrian links to the Mississippi River, enhancing the Levee Park ~ and trail syste~ and providing better access to the downtown for. boaters. In regard to private development, the City believes that I downtown's long-tenn success relies upon creating a mix of uses including retail, destination-oriented commercial, hospitality, and housing. Other elements the City desires include: .:. Recreational and aesthetic enhancement of the downtown riverfront, and improved public access to it. Please review the Levee Park Master Plan (available / attached?) to understand how development proposals can celebrate the riverfront and accomplish Plan components (even if in different forms) including riverfront gardens, promenade and a market plaza space. .:. Continuous retail storefronts on 2nd Street is a high priority, especially west of Tyler Street. .:. Housing, if it is included in the proposal, should have sufficient "critical mass" so residents feel like they are part of a neighborhood rather than like pioneers. .:. Underground parking for higher density residential development. .:. Placement of buildings up to public sidewalk to provide a traditional downtown character as opposed to a suburban character. .:. Stonn water management at the source. Space for stonn water ponding is limited, therefore developers are encouraged to suggest techniques such as rainwater gardens, rooftop gardens and pervious pavement to manage storm water in small spaces. The City will also consider storm water ponding in Levee Park. .:. The City will consider the vacation of Tyler Street and replacement with a new street near the rail alignment that links the downtown and the Mississippi River. a astings Downtown Redevelopment RFP Page 5 .- .r . ...H. .........--......H'_____---- +:+ A trail link will be needed in the Levee redevelopment area near the rail alignment between Levee Park and 2nd Street. The City expects the developer to provide a creative, urban design that encourages and incorporates the use of high quality, durable building materials. Architectural detailing is highly encouraged and landscaping and streetscape design should be used to enhance pedestrian circulation and create a sense of unity and identity. The Heart of Hastings Design Guidelines are attached. The City is in the process of adopting these guidelines. These guidelines are simply a tool for expressing the community's design vision. Developers may deviate from the specific guidelines to the extent that the proposed development remains consistent with the architectural integrity of historic Hastings and the stated goals for redevelopment. III. IV. V. Desired Developer Commitments/Contributions .++ + The developer must demonstrate an understanding and commitment to the City of Hastings concept for redevelopment. ... . The developer must demonstrate the experience necessary to organize and deliver a high quality project of the type and scale proposed. .+. . The developer is expected to provide private capital to fund 100% of the fair market value of the project. City of Hastings Commitments .:. The City will consider requests for gap financing as appropriate to assure the desired level of quality for development. ... + The City will assist in land assembly if the. developer is unable to acquire the properties through direct negotiation. ... . The City will coordinate public improvements with private redevelopment. Desired Qualifications .+. . Experience in development of the type of housing, hotel, entertainment and hospitality, retail and/or office redevelopment proposed. ... . Experience in land assembly in fully developed areas where businesses and residents are currently located. .+. . Proven organizational and project management capabilities. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP C"""--~---""._"..._._....._. Page 6 --r VI. .:. Demonstrated experience in obtaining debt and equity to finance the proposed type of development. ... . Experience in public/private development work. ... . Commitment to collaborate with City staff, HRA, and elected officials. Submission Requirements Please submit twelve (12) copies with thefollowing information: 1. A development program including type, size, estimated market value, pad size and use for each project component. A sample form is attached and available electronically at 2. A site plan that indicates how the developments will be situated on the site(s). The site plan may be a simple "bubble diagram." This RFP does not anticipate and discourages architectural drawings with elevations specific to the site. However, pictures of similar work done for other communities are welcomed. 3. A general description of the public improvements, which may be required to support the new development. Potential improvements to consider may include streetscapes, water and sewer, etc. The City understands that engineering has not been initiated as yet and that an environmental review would be undertaken if the project would proceed. However, the City would appreciate preliminary information of the type of improvement, which will be considered. 4. Proposed sale prices/rents of residential units and rental rates for the commercial space. 5. Generalized development proforma, detailing sources and uses of funds (including proposed cost of land) 6. A description of the project team including, but not limited to the lead developer, development planner, architect, engineering consultant, attorney, etc. All principals and partners must be disclosed and pertinent information provided. Any future changes in principal partner(s) will be considered by the City. 7. Background summary of related development experience, financing capacity and references :fÌ'om city officials in at least two (2) communities where you have completed similar developments. 8. Detail of unique characteristics and design elements that would be incorporated into the project. 9. Process for acquisition of private property and relocation of existing businesses. 10. Proposed timeline for development. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP Page 7 -- T All RFP packages shall be submitted to the City of Hastings, no later than 4:00 p.m., July 30. Responses should be addressed to: Hastings Downtown Redevelopment Attention: John Grossman HRA Executive Director 101 4th Street East Hastings MN 55033-1944 651-437-4127 VII. Selection This information will be reviewed and evaluated by the HRA and City and they will make the selection of developers for final proposals and interviews. Thank you again for your interest in developing within our community. We look forward to receiving information regarding your proposal. VIII. Preliminary Project Schedule Issue RFP Developer Information Session RFP Due HRA/City Developer Review June 23, 2003 week of July 7 July 30, 2003 August, 2003 Approval of Developer Development Appro val Start of Construction September 15, 2003 Fall, 2003 - Spring, 2004 Spring 2004 Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP Page 8 -- T Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP ite ite s n eatures - T Overview - Proposed Redevelo ment Areas r,,", . . [:g c:IJ .~ a [ ~i~ .918 [ ~~ G:illill~1 ~T E¡ i ITm Q I em ~~ [IT] .8 ¡\~ \,'!D [Q~ ~ m !, \, ~ ~, r;;ì~ D rnLjl\! ~ ~ w ~~ô[J\ L-18~~)\ ~ ÖSTE ~ WI'11 Legend N . W E ern' OF 1IASTIlI6S S Rail road 0 Parcels 0 Buildings Water Map prepared by City of Hastings Planning Dept. Copyright 2003 - T Proposed Redevelopment Areas .... I '\~~ - -:: ",:"" "" "" ","""" "" """"'" """" ",:"",," -":,: ,-: \",)', 0 .- 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 , ,-----""",--,,-,"---j---'-'--' ,.,-,---'-"'--"'-""'~, 0...1 0 , 0 0 , 0 0 , .;-;::<,-,'¡:::::¡'i:': :,~ .,0 " " " t;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:J ::u » ~ en m -< en --f a 00 00 00 0' 00 00 00 00 00 n" 0, 00 00 00 00 '0 00 00 00 " 00 0, 0, \:e 00 ,um,n___-- ,--nmmn,_,_J 0 0 0 0 0 0 :,m,u_"u,u,nnu,o 0,_..: \ ---Lmnn.........n_,..,mI] l uur,m,m,----------,m----,u , , , , , , , , , , : : ~ .-- .. ." om n, n nu n'nn-- m, ---, m, nmu --n'..'.. -.. --- ---- ,m,... -- n,- _ml.r< /0 ¡'(I :¡m ¡ ¡ "'T'1 ::AJ Hen ¡1-1 H :0: ,-- . , ,> -' ,'-': ::::,'::::: :,',-:::::,':,': ::::: :,-:: ,--',' ,',': ,',': ,': :,' ::,',': ,':: :: :,':: ,',-,',- :,': :,','::- . ,"" ",", """""""'T:::: :::: ::: ::::: ::: :::: ::::::: ::::'" : .;::::::::::::::: ::::::::::!(.:: ::: :::: ::::¡ :(:~::~:::~:~:) ", li>:' :nm~, ,m,U--u; uun..-"..u.m,u--'--"'-"'--- "..m.._.._- :o:::::::::::::~ cr':.. ---,..,-,: ,u--un"-- ('\ \ \ : : \ \ 'j Legend Private land Buildings .'~.; . , ""'. ~ , - ' N W+E .. . . .. Public Land ~ ~ Water ," c::> c::> C) lake Isabel Shoreland Area /.. ,.' ... ",/ Roads Mississippi River Shoreland Area Railroads ern' OF HItSTlN6S s Parcels Map prepared by City of Hastings Planning Dept. Copyright 2003 'r ....--.......-.-. - -- ...-.---..-.-.-...------.- Proposed Redevelopment Area i1 ii :¡ - :_-::::::: --: --:: --: ::::::: : --:_- :_- :_- ---- --:: ::: -- ----::::::::::: -- --:: :_---: -- ::: /' 2ND ST E ----------------_---_-000-_-"_-__"000_----------__--_000__-' - 000 -- --.. - -- - -- - - u- u.. - -.u- uu. - -.. --.- - -- -. - - - 0000.- ----- -------_.uu.uh"__"---- " " i1 :: i~ \Iirm :_J --_------_m__.m-----m-T11::O : ::,^ ¡ ¡iu ,,-1 ¡ :: : ¡: ¡ Ii : :: : :: ------..---.._0. . , i"""" "", "",i),\ .Q.i . -""""""':::"":::::::::::::::':::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ~ .~::; .:.:;---...---: :--'--"'_"__'h'_'----~-:'--~,-- ::::-----r=-===-;"-'--'-':-""'", C) C) Legend C) ~ I I " Parcels Buildings ", , ..-... ..- :' \..- .. . . . .. Roads _----m-_uu-_muu_- ¡_--mm..m--"'h'----- '~,~': i :,:'\ u.--------m-.i--mu,."--_u_u__u'--'-' --.., ,,: ""'" "'" "" 'I: "":"",::,, ,,: """ "",:",.. ,;::::::::::::::\\ ,- :.:,,_:.:-,::> '::::-. :: --::::::::::,. ( ',~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !~~~~~ ~~~~~~~1 ;~~:~~~~~-~-~~~~:::. :: , -'-..-..u' \\ : .-u: , : ¡ \",\, : \ \ : : ii ' : : :: ¡ ¡ ¡i;ooo "'0 :1\ ~ . of b~.',~~:~- -"-"-.- 'ii! \ :: :~ : :: '-, , , '-"':,'--" - -"" ' d \\ ¡j \,Cj-"- !, ':\ :: '::' ~ ~\ ¡¡ , 1 ¡¡ ,',--() ¡¡ 0_<_'_--.: :: \~".uh...m_i : \,mUh"",-,,__U_Uh; 3RD ST E ~~ F~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~Z-'-- : -+:: ::: :::::.000 - 000 000 m.m... . .. --... 'f . Oq :I : -uu..--- Lake Isabel Shore land Area Private land Public land ~ "---/ , ' , ' 0 . , . 0 ' , ' , ---.--- ...., L - 000 t- -.. - 0. - -- - - -.. -:- -.. --- -:::::::::::. " " " " " " " " " " " " , '. , , , , , . ...~;::::: : :-:- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:' ~ ~ ::- ~:- ~:':::: :-::: :-:-:-:::: ::::::':-:::-: :: ,/ ,0.--- I I ' i ". Ii. r- - T----' - ..-m_"- \,m\,u :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::;;:: ..,,_--.....m...u-"-"-'--., . ' !~"":,, ,,: ,,::: ,:::: :::::::::: :::: i , i I [] [ """"'--"'" , -"""uumm " \ \, \ ì \ , I \ \\ \n \ "., .. ,'I i\l) \ \ " \: \ ' ! ' , \ ill i \ : \ \ i II \, \ :uuuuu, : :: , ," , , , ", , ", on::::::::::::::: :::::::.:::::::: -~,---:;: \ii- -- \_n ,1-n\ - -\n- n- --- n...- -: ""'¡:"'~"ì-",,\-"'i.,'\-, ---""\,,--'~"-----\: ' ' ~--..----..--.._._u__m_""'_'h--____..__...._m_____" \ :\ \ :\ , : " II \ \ '! \ \\1,,; \ '\ : ' I \ 000",' , ..."'0._000_000- ì\ "",,000"""""" ',. r------------------J .- , , , : .-:'..------u_----...--¡ N ,~~ ~~~ E w ern' oF 1l.ASTlR6S s Map prepared by City of Hastings Planning Dept. Copyright 2003 r Proposed Redevelopment Area --""--"-, , ' , ' :,...,.....----t "__m--..,,, ;--,--...".--~ [ ,,- ..-' " -. -- --.., m.....,""" ,..l.-.ooo'~- \",::::,.,/ . . . , , , '....' >, --...m..m_.. , ---~ - """"::::::::::::::.._,...~.-....._,-,,,.,>..,.,.....,...""_"...._, j! :IJ 1: 1::1-1\ 1 :1' ~i (n______----______n___n______~::::::::::::::::-_~\'n,~¡ ',_n______n______-- :: n::: ..m': :::;00::: \\ 4: ~ L.m.mm.m.m.......; : ¡ ¡H: ¡ ¡ - .. - ,. '0""""""""'-' """'.m, --:::::: ", L..-- ~ ""'" D c;J ....- u....'..., . ....-.. mm ,m m",'" ......... ......- ,.. -,' 'h..... ..--..-.." ............._..m..m..""""'-"""" J D 0 ......., -..........".... en -I ....... m. ....-...... m.""', F'::: :-,: :.:, -::::.: '::.: '.: ':'::':'1 i.',~~-.~~~~~ ~ ~~'.~',~',~'-~~:'. ~'.'-~ ~ ; '_"'_h"'_"'_"""" ,-....-.....-.....-..--- ;::::::::::"",...",... Ii]! .." 5TU SI E ,--' (ç;.tl""""'~"""'_J ¡~ \IS"'i""",']II ~,:~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~T~~~~~~~~~~~~¡ I ¡ -f------------ --------- -- ---,,----------' f::::::::::: ~::::::::::: ;""""""f"""";"" \] n !i N Legend '" w ~J~ ~~ E C) .. Parcels " Roads , ' ,,: 0 Buildings ... Public Land . . . . .. ern' OF 1lASl'DT8S s Map prepared by City of Hastings Planning Dept. Copyright 2003 T' Site Features Levee Area and Historic Depot Sites Utilities .:. Parcels north of the alley need increased water capacity probably via a new main along the north side of the parcels. .:. Sanitary sewer is available on the north side of the parcels. .:. Private utilities are in the alley running east and west. Regulations .:. The buildings between Sibley and Ramsey Street are in a Historic District. .:. The Shoreland Areas boundaries are shown on the map. The major impact is runoff mitigation. .:. The Critical Area boundary is in the same general area. The major impact is landscaping. .:. The 100-year flood area is roughly along the north property line from Sibley to Tyler Street. The north end of the area east of Tyler is assumed to be in the 100 year flood area. Oth er .:. The CP Rail mainline runs north-south along the east side of the map. .:. The elevator buildings shown on map southeast of 2nd and Tyler are demolished. .:. The elevator block would be a commuter rail station if/when a line to Hastings is authorized by the State .:. There is a power transmission line running east-west between the site and the river. .:. The HRA completed a Voluntary Response Action on Block 1 in 1997 to address soil and ground water contamination known as the Northeast Hastings Ground Water Plume Site. The former owner of the north end of Block 1 completed a Voluntary Response Action and a Petroleum Release Clean-Up prior to the HRA acquisition of the property. .:. A Phase I Environmental Review completed on the Historic Depot Block and a Transaction Screen on the 4th Street Site showed no evidence of hazardous materials. .:. In areas a limestone bedrock is close to the surface. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP ar et n ormation T" MEMORANDUM To: Bruce Chamberlain, Rusty Fifield, HKGi From: Dick Paik, Bonz/REA, Inc. Re: Downtown Opportunities Date: August 7, 2002 This memorandum presents a general summary of potential development opportunities in downtown Hastings. Attached Housing: Downtown Hastings offers opportunities for attached housing development. Such opportunities face substantial challenges. These will most likely limit the scale of prospective developments, with few if any projects including more than 40 dwelling units. In genera~ the most attractive opportunities would target: . Small projects on high-amenity sites offering river views, ample building amenities and convenient proximity to recreational and retail amenities; and . Rental projects in and around downtown targeting moderate price tiers (e.g., $650- $850/month rent for two-bedroom units). This general finding draws support from the following: Performances of current condominium developments. Various duplex and townhouse developments have achieved reasonable absorption rates (e.g. 2-2.5 du/mo.) at prices ranging from $150,000 to $225,000; one project has achieved similar absorption rates with homes priced from $285,000 to $325,000. Non-local builders have begun targeting Hastings: these include Sherman Associates, one of the Twin Cities' major residential condominium developers, as well as nationally prominent home builders Centex and DR Horton. These companies have achieved rapid initial absorption rates at the Guardian Angels (Sherman, rental) and South Oaks (Centex) projects. , "':L'.c>' - r Downtown Hastings Redevelopment Plan August 8, 2002 Page 2 Downtown living alternatives have become increasingly popular. This has been reflected in the recent or ongoing successes of downtown multi-family projects in smaller communities such as Stillwater, Hopkins and Robbinsdale. Notwithstanding these positive indications, downtown residential development will face substantial challenges. To date, among recent developments, only Guardian Angels is located downtown. At the other projects, marketing success has driven in part by affordability issues, with homes selling well below $200,000 in many cases. Downtown land costs, along with ample competition from these ongoing developments, will drive at least some downtown residential developments into the higher-priced niches. Such developments will need to offer high-quality units, building amenities and proximity to recreational and retail amenities. Retail Overview and Business Environment: Downtown Hastings maintains consistently high occupancy rates. Downtown businesses include a mix of specialty retailers, restaurants, and businesses providing everyday goods and services (e.g., hardware, hair care, copying, unprepared food). Most retailers operate independently; many originated in or otherwise maintain ties to the Hastings community. Sales are derived from a mix of local residents and visitors; interviewed store owners estimated that visitors account for more than half of their sales. Under these generally healthy conditions, opportunities for new stores focus on visitor-oriented niches. Such niches involve gifts, unique furnishings/accessories, eating and drinking, antiques, and other such goods and services. Field surveys of other downtown districts reveal a number of retail store types that may be under-represented in downtown Hastings. These store types include businesses selling goods and services such as: hobby items (various), books, luggage, cookware/kitchenware, apparel stores, fitness centers and restaurants (diverse cuisines). While not all of these store types will necessarily prove viable in downtown Hastings, they nonetheless provide a useful list of the types of tenants that occupy space in similar downtown settings. Given prevailing lease rates below $10 per square foot, new businesses can support lease obligations with relatively modes sales volumes (e.g., $100-$125/square foot). BaiZlv's Landing: The proposed Bailly's Landing project features a wide-ranging mix of retail, restaurant, brewery, residential and lodging uses. While market analyses would not likely identify an opportunity for this project, the project provides an example of the possibility for investment from various . parties possessing unique insights, passions, creativity, and other such personal and professional resources. If this project is developed, it will: (1) exert substantial visual impacts; (2) attract overnight as additional "daytrip" visitors; and (3) help downtown capture increased local visitation and spending; and (4) enhance downtown's overall stature and contribute to new residential as well as business growth prospects. ..- T Downtown Hastings Redevelopment Plan August 8, 2002 Page 3 Other Retail Development Prospects: While downtown Hastings will continue to offer opportunities for new retail tenants, the potential for substantial new retail development faces substantial challenges. These include: . Prevailing lease rates along Main Street occupy a wide range; higher-quality store space achieves lease rates of approximately $8 to $10 per square foot on a gross basis. In comparison, gross-equivalent lease rates in the Mid-Town or Westview areas range from approximately $10 to as high as $20 per square foot in some cases. Developers seeking to maximize returns on new construction investments will identify the higher revenue potential that can be derived from standard shopping center formats as preferable to the potential from new downtown investments. . Retail businesses typically seek opportunities generated by rapid growth. Over the next five years, projected growth rates in Hastings and its surroundings anticipate growth at 1 percent to 1.3 percent per year. Such growth is respectable but lags behind the corresponding growth rates for Dakota County. H- T Downtown Hastings Redevelopment Plan August 8, 2002 Page 4 Demographic Trends and Projections: 1990-2006 A vg. Ann. Change A vg. Ann. Change 1990 2001 it % 2006 it % Hastings Population 15,445 18,096 241 1.5% 18,994 180 1.0% Households 5,403 6,702 118 2.0% 7,146 89 1.3% 3-mile Radius Population 17,999 21,116 283 1.5% 22,158 208 1.0% Households 6,254 7,726 134 1.9% 8,227 100 1.3% 5-Mile Radius Population 21,581 25,564 362 1.6% 26,893 266 1.0% Households 7,407 9,212 164 2.0% 9,829 123 1.3% Dakota County Population 275,227 361,958 7,885 2.5% 392,465 6,101 1.6% Households 98,293 133,796 3,228 2.8% 146,451 2,531 1.8% {:\?iJ Source: Claritas, Inc. """:.":";' , "'-.i,::,'.\') . Absent rapid residential growth, retailers will seek locations in locations that provide high visibility due to: high visitation levels, local employment concentrations, proximity to anchor destinations, and/or access to major highways. At this time, downtown Hastings derives much of its retail sales from visitor traffic, but downtown does not offer the auto- or pedestrian traffic sufficient to drive sales volumes that will in turn support higher rent levels. . Where the Hastings market is able to attract new retail development, downtown Hastings will face competition 1Ì'om alternative locations near conventional and large-format retail centers elsewhere in the City. Ongoing development of such retail centers will influence the mix of uses in the downtown area: while many businesses will be able to maintain their customer bases and draw upon visitor spending, others (typically those providing utilitarian goods such as drugs, groceries, hardware, etc.) will face increasingly formidable competition. . Established franchise retailers generally prefer conventional shopping center formats, which offer easily perceived parking, anchor destinations, and uniform store hours. Such tenants, while not necessarily suitable for Main Street, typically pay higher lease rates, offer greater stability, and are more easily contacted by leasing agents. Most developers will seek opportunities to target these tenants rather than unique 'businesses seeking Main Street retail space. ...- T Downtown Hastings Redevelopment Plan August 8, 2002 Page 5 . Developers and business owners seeking opportunities in historic downtowns can identify several alternatives in the Twin Cities area. Despite the constraints discussed above, certain types of investors seek opportunities in downtown settings. Such investors, however, can consider opportunities in other small downtowns such as Excelsior, Stillwater, Anoka, White Bear Lake and Chaska. In comparison with Hastings, these settings generally offer larger demographic concentrations, higher income levels, and comparable or more rapid growth prospects. Thus, in seeking to attract investors seeking opportunities in small downtown settings, Hastings faces difficult competition. COMPARATIVE DEMOGRAPHIC INDICATORS WITHIN 5-MILE RADII OF COMPARABLE DOWNTOWN DISTRICTS Median Household Income Total Households m2 2001 Change 2001 2006 Change Hastings $36,806 $55,835 51.7% 6,702 7,146 1.3% Anoka $41,837 $70,590 68.7% 41,367 45,158 1.8% Chaska $36,264 $58,958 62.6% 15,355 17,502 2.7% Excelsior $52,146 $97,727 87.4% 30,666 32,722 1.3% Stillwater $41,530 $59,147 42.4% 33,276 34,654 0.8% White Bear Lake $43,537 $76,016 74.6% 30,327 31,586 0.8% Source: Claritas, Inc. Office Development Prospects: - Office development will seek proximity to (1) other office concentrations, which furnish a supply of potential tenants and (2) professional labor. Downtown Hastings cannot satisfy either criterion. The general surroundings do not contain any large office parks. In regard to labor, the Hastings community features a relatively industrial character. In comparison with surrounding communities, the Hastings labor force features relatively low indices in regard to educational attainment and executive/professional occupations. -- r Downtown Hastings Redevelopment Plan August 8, 2002 Page 6 SELECTED LABOR FORCE INDICATORS SELECTED AREAS: 2000 Stillwater 4-yr. Exec/ college Man 'genal degree+ Professional 20.2% 30.9% 37.5% 40.2% 34.9% 39.5% 34.3% 39.9% 33.9% 41. 0% Hastings Dakota County Ramsey County Washington County Source: u.s. Census Office space will be required for household-serving (as opposed to corporate-serving) professional service providers. Such providers include firms and individuals involved in legal, health, financial, insurance, real estate, and other such fields. Most of these businesses, however, will occupy small offices, and will not demand space in excess of the supply in existing storefront spaces, second-floor spaces and other small office buildings. - -T- Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP r - "T . Olllll . lnance e art 0 Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP astin s . eSl.ll . . UI e IlleS --.,. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP eve 0 ment ra ram or s eet ..-- í EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC City of Hastings Project Development Worksheet -1 Target Estimated Volume Estimated Component Description Market Assessors (# of Units Land Payment Taxes Property Component Valoe Market or SqlFt) (For Pad) (PerlUnit or Identification Project Area . Valoe SqlFt) Number (Pad Size) Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC Project Development Worksheet Sample -1 Target Estimated Volume Estimated Property Component Assessors Land Payment Taxes Component Description Market (# of Units Identification Project Area Market (for pad) (per unit or Value or Sq/Ft) Number (pad size) Value square feet) Town Two story owner, Homes occupied quad town $250,000 $210,000 60 units $10,000IUnit $3,000IUnit XXXXXXXX 5.3 Acres homes Neighborhood convenience (Dry Included in Retail cleaner, coffee shop) $100 Sq/Ft $100 Sq/Ft 7,500 Sq/Ft $4.00 Sq/Ft $4.50 Sq/Ft XXXXXXXXXX T own Homes lower level of town homes Retail Walgreens Drug store $87 Sq/Ft $87 Sq/Ft 8,750 Sq/Ft $8.00 Sq/Ft $4.25 Sq/Ft XXXXXXXXXX 43,760 Sq/Ft Office Three story class "B" $125 Sq/Ft $115 Sq/Ft 45,000 Sq/Ft $3.50 Sq/Ft $3.75 Sq/Ft XXXXXXXXXX 1.5 Acres office Hastings Downtown Redevelopment RFP EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 0 I To: :Ii I From: W I Date: :IE I Subject: John Grossman, Hastings HRA Jim Prosser & Jessica Cook, Ehlers & Associates June 10, 2003 Updated Redevelopment Process Provided below is a description of the major activities which will be required to complete the redevelopment of targeted areas in downtown Hastings. There are two changes since the Council and HRA last reviewed this document. First, we have clarified that the Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. (HKGi) is involved at many key points in the redevelopment process. Second, we have added a column to document the steady progress the City and HRA have already made. , ..' ',' " ~~,~ Frame Date ,.,Completed ' May 27, 2003 Establish Redevelopment Process Review how redevelopment process helps achieve community goals. 1.) StaffÆhlers prepares process for review with HRA Board and City Council. April - May 2003 2.) Process refined to meet local needs and concerns. -; 3.) StaffÆhlers prepare public participation and communication plan for HRA and Council . reVIew. Communication plan in progress. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment - Ehlers & Associates Development Management Services Page 2 Affirm Redevelopment Goals Clearly established goals are key to gaining community support and assuring target results. -1 1.) HRA Board and City Council lead establishing goals, communicating to public and seeking feedback. 2.) The development goals should reflect the purpose of development (increase vitality of downtown, eliminate blighted buildings, etc.) as opposed to the particular form of the development. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment - Ehlers & Associates Development Management Services i~~~~~~ ... CQ~:~:ted April-May 2003 HRAlCouncil will consider refined goals June 12 and 16 Page 3 Development Concept Review Irefinement -1 T~ùfitc ~~, ' Staff/planners prepare concept plan including development programs for project sub-areas (including target redevelopment areas). 2.) Project team seeks feedback on concept plan from qualified developers including feedback on feasibility of attracting national retailers and housing components. 3.) Based on the completed Master Plan, staff/HKGi identify target redevelopment components (i.e. 'x' units of senior housing, 'x' square feet of retail space) for each project sub area. Components are identified by use and density, not by architectural style. For example, the concept may call for 30 units of housing and 10,000 sq. ft. of retail, but would not specify whether the housing is constructed above the retail, nor whether the retail is a restaurant or an office. 4.) Ehlers assesses project financial feasibility. 5.) Refine concept to enhance market and financial feasibility. 6.) Present refined concept to HRA Board (June meeting) and City Council. 7. ) Seek community feedback on refined concept plan through a press release or newsletter. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment - Ehlers & Associates Development Management Services April - June 2003 April, 2003 May, 2003 May, 2003 N/A N/A June 25, 2003 Page 4 Public Improvements Development RFP/Q Concept Review Developer Selection (competitive) - Public improvements required or desired are identified and cost estimates prepared. HRA Board reviews RFP/Q prior to soliciting! accepting proposals. Qualified developers are selected to redevelop targeted project areas. 1.) Concept plan is reviewed by staff/engineers/HKGi determine requirements for public improvements to service new development, such as parking, utilities, sidewalks, etc. 2.) Cost estimates are prepared and funding options reviewed. 3.) Project feasibility assessed. 1.) StafflEhlers/HKGi prepare development phasing, targeted development programs and selection criteria for HRA Board and City Council to . reVIew. 1.) Qualified developers are identified and solicited for RFP/Q in competitive process. 2.) Development proposals are evaluated based on - developer experience, financial capacity and the proposal's alignment with targeted development goals. 3.) StaffÆhlers/HKGi and project team prepare analysis of development proposals for review by HRA Board and City Council. 4.) Hold a community open house for public to review proposals and provide feedback (optional). 5.) HRAlCity Council select firms for final interviews. 6.) HRAlCity Council make developer selection. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment - Ehlers & Associates Development Management Services . ,.'. ',':<' ..,"" ',i.,,' ,,-' I " TiJòeFrame . ' , '" ' },' ;::;}:~,:. May-June 2003 June 2003 July - August 2003 May, 2003 HRA/Council to review RFP in June for distribution on June 23, 2003 Page 5 Preliminary Development Phase 1.) Site plans prepared (interactive process with project team, developer and community). . . ~ :-,:': .\>." . .:'" ,,' ..',.'. :"'. Time Frame: . . . . :,::':'.', '>:"'\:.'}/}: .' Site plan, project financing and related issues are refined and final development agreement issues are identified. September 2003 - May 2004 2.) Project financial costs estimates are refmed and reviewed by project. 3.) Open House held with community to receive feedback on developer's concepts (optional). Community issues identified. 4.) Land acquisition issues and estimated costs identified. 5.) Project financing issues reviewed, preliminary commitments secured. 6.) Project timetable prepared. 7.) Proposed option shared with the community at an open house and through newsletter. '1 8.) Final development agreement issues, including final project components, financing, level and types of assistance, timing, and site control are identified for policy review by HRAlCity Council. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment - Ehlers & Associates Development Management Services Page 6 Evaluate the Need for Financial Assistance ..¡ Land Use Approvals and Environmental Review It is likely that financial assistance will be required in order to complete the revitalization project. The HRA and City will need to determine the level and form of assistance (i.e., tax increment and/or land write-down) it will provide. Establishing a tax increment district will permit, but does not require, provision of assistance Identify and review all land use and other regulatory approvals required for development. These land use approvals are separate and independent from Development Concept Review and Developer Assistance Agreement. I.) Determine potential need for assistance. 2.) Identify and iterate public goals that would be accomplished if assistance is provided. 3. ) Identify and evaluate potential sources of assistance, including CDBG, land write-down, tax increment, Met Council grants, and assistance available through the Dakota County CDA such as tax-exempt housing bonds. 4.) If the Council/HRA approves, in concept, the use of tax increment, prepare "but for" analysis and tax increment plan. (This level of analysis is related to the potential need for assistance and is not tied to a specific project). 5.) Conduct public hearing. 6.) Approve district. (Timing of establishing district will depend on project schedule since there are disadvantages to starting district before new value is created.) 1.) City staff/HKGi to identify land use and other regulatory approvals. 2.) Planning Commission and City Council to review land use as required. 3.) City staff to determine if development concept triggers any environmental review requirements. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment - Ehlers & Associates Development Management Services !~;iJ)~~31:. tCl::~:ted Fall 2003 - Spring 2004 Spring 2004 Page 7 Developer Assistance Agreement This agreement outlines the level and form of assistance to be provided to developer including financial and land assembly. It also specifies developer performance for type and timing of development. Final development concept is part of final development agreement (subject to land use approval). The level of assistance required is determined by an independent analysis of developer project financial plan (pro forma). The final decision regarding the use and level of assistance is made by the HRAICity Council Land Assembly and Relocation Once a Developer Assistance Agreement is approved, the developer will begin land assembly. If the developer needs HRA assistance with land assembly, it will be initiated at this time. 1.) Developer submits pro forma if financial assistance is required. 2.) Ehlers reviews developer pro forma to determine required level of assistance. 3.) Staff /Ehlers drafts a memo outlining terms of the Development Agreement. 4.) Terms are reviewed by the HRA Board/City Council. 5.) Agreement is drafted as legal document. 6.) Agreement is considered by HRA Board for approval. 1.) Ideally, the Developer will have obtained purchase agreements from willing sellers prior to this stage. The purchase agreements would have been contingent upon' approval of City /HRA assistance and financing. 2.) Relocation consultant is retained and prepares relocation estimates as needed. 3.) Mediation to assist with land assembly if needed. 4.) HRA to consider request for assembly assistance, if needed. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment - Ehlers & Associates Development Management Services "" ,',,', " " ""," 'TillÌeFrame ,,' ,> , ," .. Spring 2004 Spring- Summer 2004 Page 8 Project Initiation After approval of developer assistance agreement and land use approvals developer will proceed with project implementation steps. "1 1.) Developer secures financing. 2.) Developer/ authority purchases land. 3.) Relocation initiated. 4.) Developer initiates site prep. 5.) Construction initiated. Hastings Downtown Redevelopment - Ehlers & Associates Development Management Services i~~i,~~' k: a:::ted Spring- Summer 2004 VIII-C-1 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Dave Osberg, City Administrator June 12, 2003 City Hall Roof Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Bids RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL ACTION It is recommended that the City Council take action approving the plans and specifications for the replacement of the roof on the historical part of the City Hall, and authorize the receipt of bids for the project. . BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting on Tuesday January 21, 2003 action was taken authorizing the hiring of Setter, Leach and Lindstrom (Leo Daly) as the architect/engineer to prepare the plans and specifications for the roof repair at the City Hall. During the course of routine inspection of the City Hall Roof, Facilities Maintenance Operator Tom Kusant discovered hail damage and received authorization from the LMCIT to have it replaced. SLULeo Daly have been working the last several months with City Staff, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City, and received comment and Review from the State Historic Preservation Office, and they have granted approval to solicit bids. The HPC approved the design and asked if tin-zinc coated copper was available, rather than tin-zinc coated stainless steel. The architect located the material and will call for it in the specs. The HPC will approve of this material when the building permit is requested, and SHPO will be sending a letter approving the design and material. A full set of plans and specifications is available in my office if you would like to review, and I will bring them to the meeting on Monday night. The schedule will call for bids to be received on July 9,2003, with an award by the City Council scheduled for the meeting on July 21, 2003. Construction would be completed by about eptember 19, 2003. ~ I I I I I I I r AD VER TISEl\1ENT FORBIDS HASTINGS CITY HALL ROOF REPAIR 101 4th Street East Hastings, MN 55033-1955 The City of Hastings, MN will accept sealed bids to furnish all labor, materials, tools, pennits, machinery, equipment and services necessary for the Hastings City Hall Roof Repair, per plans and Project Manual, until 2:00 PM local time on July 9, 2003 in the Community Room of the Hastings City Hall, at which time bids will be publicly opened and read. The City reserves the right to reject any and/or all bids and to waive any informalities in the bids. Refer questions regarding the project documents to Walter J. Daniels, SLULeo A Daly, 1100 US Trust Building, Minneapolis, MN 55402-2454 (612 341-9521) WJDani els @ leoadaI y.com Bids must be received by the City on or before the due date and time. No late bids will be accepted. All bids are to be submitted in a sealed envelope, with the envelope clearly marked "Bid - Hastings City Hall Roof Repair". . A pre-bid meeting for this project is scheduled to be held at the Community Room, Hastings City Hall, Hastings, MN at 2:00 PM on June 26,2003. This bid requires a 5% bid bond. June 16, 2003 Advertisements for Bids - 1 Com. 212003-00 -- .r -_.__._._..._~..._._------ ..---...-...---..... ._.... --~---~ r I I i ;! i i i i ,I \ . j , ). ~~ "' " ì . ., .~"í'"": '"oR) .if '. '¡, \: ,,'" " , j f~ .\ .~ .', c" " ~ J~ .\ 't. f ' !é ~~~ " ~......--T , I , , I ! i 11 Hastings City Hall Roof Repair Proj ect Description June 11,2003 SLL/Leo A Daly The project consists of the removal of the existing metal roof, excluding the center dome and four cupolas, and replacing the roof with one similar in appearance to the existing roof. The existing metal gutters will also be replaced at this time. The new roof will use a copper metal coated with a zinc/tin alloy. This will preserve the existing gray appearance while providing the long-tenn durability of copper. The new roof will also be similar in construction to the existing roof. Standing seam metal panels will be replicated on sloping areas and flat seam panel construction used on the flat area near the center dome. These techniques, in addition ,to preserving the appearance, are still in use today and are common to metal roof construction. The existing lights, which light the central dome, will be reinstalled. The existing roof hatch will be replaced with a hatch approximately 18" larger and safer to operate. In addition, a safer ladder to the roofhatch will also be provided as part of this proj ect. -- r VIII -C- 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers FROM: Dave Osberg, City Administrator DATE: June 12,2003 SUBJECT: Old Mill Pawn Shop License Renewal Recommended Cit Council Action It is recommended that the City Council take action approving the annual Pawn Shop license renewal, effective 2003-2004. Background At the meeting on Monday June 2, 2003 the City Council took action denying the application for the 2003-2004 Pawnbroker'slPrecious Metal Dealer License for Old Mill Pawn. The reason for denial was due to failure to make current payments for the APS fees that were outstanding. After a meeting on Wednesday June 11, 2003 that included Sergeant Valerie Scharfe, Police Chief Mike McMenomy, Bob Bohn and myself, the fees and charges due were reconciled. Payment of $800.00 was received on Thursday June 12, 2003 and all payments are current, thus warranting the recommendation that the annual license be renewed. ..- T . .--....... ... ..._.._.n'-_',',--"-"-'----""'------.,-"--,,,,