Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4 - Variances - MRCCA Trail To: Planning Commissioners From: Justin Fortney, City Planner Date: October 27, 2025 Item: MRCCA Variances #2025-17 – MRG Trail between Lake Rebecca Causeway and the Eagle Bluff Neighborhood – Dakota County Planning Commission Action Requested Review and make a recommendation to the City Council acting as the Board of Zoning Adjstmnet and Appeals on the three requests listed below. These requested variances are related to proposed improvements to the existing MRG (Mississippi River Greenway) Trail. 1. Construction of a hard surfaced trail on the face of bluffs greater than 30% slope. Hastings City Code Chapter 152A.08.G.3.a 2. Construction of a retaining wall within the BIZ (Bluff Impact Zone) for a purpose other than to correct an established erosion problem as determined by the city. Hastings City Code Chapter 152A.10.C2.b. 3. A two-foot height variance for the proposed seven-foot-tall retaining wall. Hastings City Code Chapter 152A.10.C.2.c.(1) Background Information Dakota County is responsible for the design and maintenance of the MRG (Mississippi River Greenway) trail system. They propose reconstruction of this section to meet PROWAG (Public Right-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (ADA)) standards and for improved safety. The existing trail has a slope over 9% and the ADA standard is a maximum of 5% for multi-use trails. To achieve a maximum 5% slope, some of the trail profile is proposed to be lowered. The existing horizontal alignment includes a hairpin curve that is the tightest on the MRG trail system and that curve will be expanded. MRCCA (Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area) The MRCCA Ordinance was adopted by the City of Hastings in 2023, after the State Legislature delegated responsibility to local governments of the state to regulate their subdivision, use, and development to preserve and enhance the corridor. The MRCCA regulations are intended to establish standards that protect primary conservation areas and public river corridor views from development impacts, maintain stability of bluffs, critical and erosion-prone areas, protect water quality, and encourage restoration of natural vegetation. Staff is administratively reviewing MRCCA vegetation clearing and land alteration permits for the project (applications attached). Hastings City Code Chapter 153 Shoreland Management also includes provisions for grading and vegetation clearing for paths that are reviewed administratively with the MRCCA permits. Planning Commission Memorandum Requests The current trail was constructed the BIZ (Bluff Impact Zone, a bluff and land located within 20 feet of the bluff) with a retaining wall and in areas of steep slopes. This was done long before the adopted MRCCA Ordince that limits these improvements. The request is to modify the existing trail the minimum amount necessary to improve safety and meet minimum accessibility standards. The project will also correct existing erosion, removal of invasive plants, and the shortening of a long overlook trail section. The following three variance requests would allow the trail grade to be reduced by lowering some trail elevations. 1. A variance to allow a hard surfaced trail on the face of bluffs with slopes greater than 30%. Approximately 2,125 square feet of the proposed path along 410 linear feet of the hard surface of the reconstructed trail are proposed on existing slopes exceeding 30% within the BIZ. The existing slopes in those areas range from 30% to 42.1%. The remaining bluff is protected from erosion by the proposed retaining wall and gentle grade with vegetation. 2. A variance to construct a retaining wall within the Bluff Impact Zone to avoid creating an erosion control problem from trail alteration, rather than to correct an existing erosion problem. 3. A two-foot variance to construct a retaining wall up to 7-feet tall, to prevent erosion from trail alteration. A retaining wall is limited to 5-feet tall unless an engineer states that a taller one is necessary to correct an existing erosion issue. Typical diagram of requests Variance Definition Variances are a permitted departure from strict enforcement of the ordinance as applied to a particular piece of property. The Board of Adjustment and Appeals may issue a variance upon determination of findings of fact and conclusions supporting the variance as established in Chapter 30.02, Subd. F of the City Code. < Existing retaining wall < Proposed retaining wall Existing trail Proposed trail < Existing bluff slope Board of Zoning Adjustment and Appeals Hastings City Code Chapter 30.02 establishes the Board of Zoning Adjustment and Appeals and appoints the City Council to fill that role with review by the Planning Commission. Applications for variances require review by the Board of Zoning Adjustment and Appeals. Variance Review City Code Chapter 30.02(F) establishes the requirement for granting variances. The City Council acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals considers land use variances including to Chapter 152a Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area that are not contrary to the public interest where owing to special conditions, and where a literal enforcement of the provision of the City Code would result in practical difficulties. Variances may be granted providing the following has been satisfied (staff review appears in bold italics): (1) Because of the particular physical surroundings, shape or topographic conditions of the land involved, a practical difficulty to the owner would result, as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out; if the strict letter of the regulations were to be carried out, the owner would encounter practical difficulties in providing an accessible 28-mile route from St. Paul to Hastings with additional connections. This relatively limited section of the Mississippi River Greenway Trail is preexisting in this location that rises 60-feet in a relatively short distance. These physical surroundings and topographical conditions do not allow for an accessible trail under the strict letter of the regulations. (2) The conditions upon which the petition for a variance is based are unique to the tract of land for which the variance is sought and not applicable, generally, to other property with the same zoning classification; The conditions above are highly unique to the subject tract of land. While there may be other areas with similar elevation changes, they do not have an existing trail traversing them. (3) The purpose of the variance is not based exclusively upon a desire to increase the value or income potential of the parcel of land; The owner is a government organization simply providing a transportation route and does not receive profit or property value from the variances. (4) The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other land or improvements in the vicinity in which the tract of land is located; The granting of the variances will not be detrimental to the public welfare. In fact, without the variances, the existing trail layout with a hairpin curve and 9% grade will remain detrimental to the public welfare. (5) The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to property, or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets, or increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety or substantially diminish or impair property values within the vicinity; The variances would not impair light, air, increase congestion or fire danger, endanger the public safety, or diminish property values within the vicinity. The trail will become more safe, existing erosion control issues will be repaired, and the native vegetation quality will be improved and increased. (6) The variance is in harmony with the purposes and intent of ordinance; Yes, the purpose and intent of the ordinance is to preserve and enhance the quality of important historic, cultural, aesthetic values, and natural systems and provide for the wise use of these areas. The project with the proposed variances will maintain vegetative screening of the trail from the public river corridor views, provide more accessible access to the Mississippi River corridor, repair current erosion issues in the vicinity of the trail, and restoration of natural vegetation using native species. (7) The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan; Yes, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan MRCCA Chapter guides us to provide adequate public trails to and along the river, utilize and maintain this regional trail, repair existing erosion, restoring natural vegetation in riparian areas with native species. (8) The proposal puts the property to use in a reasonable manner; The proposal continues the existing use in a safer way, which has been identified in the MRCCA Comprehensive Plan chapter. (9) There are practical difficulties in complying with the official control. “Practical difficulties”, as used in connection with the granting of the variance means that: (a) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an official control; Yes, as stated in number 8 above. (b) The practical difficulty is caused by the provisions of this chapter and has not been created by any persons presently or formerly having an interest in the parcel of land; The elevation difference and existing location of this regional trail predate the provisions of the chapter, causing practical difficulties. 1. A practical difficulty is not present if the proposal could be reasonably accomplished under the current Ordinance requirements. The proposal could not reasonably be accomplished under the current ordinance requirements because the existing slope and trail location dictate what must be done to lay out a trail with a grade no more than 5%. Under the current ordinance requirements, this layout is not allowed. (c) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposal will continue the existing character of the locality. (d) Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. There are no economic considerations involved in the proposal. (e) Practical difficulties include inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Not applicable. 10. The variance, if granted, will not negatively impact primary conservation areas, public river corridor views, and other resources without conditions to mitigate the impacts. The extent of land alterations is limited to the minimum necessary to properly adjust the trail, repair existing erosion, and replace invasive vegetation. The areas impacted must be graded and revegetated consistent with the grading and revegetation plans. These plans consider erosion, bluff stability, and public river corridor views. NOTIFICATION Property owners within 350-feet of the subject property were notified of the requests along with the Minnesota DNR and National Park Service. Staff has not received any comments. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the variance is recommended based on the preceding findings of fact and subject to the following conditions. Conditions 1. Conformance with the Planning Commission Staff Report dated October 27, 2025 and all attachments. 2. Approval is subject to a Sunset Clause; if progress on the proposal is not made within 18- months of City Council approval, the approval is null and void. 3. City of Hastings Planning Department approval of both MRCCA vegetation clearing and land alteration permit applications under review and conformance with all approvals. 4. Conformance with Hastings City Code Chapter 153 Shoreland Management, including grading, vegetation clearing, and erosion protection provisions. 5. Amend the existing trail lease agreement to include the slight trail layout changes. ATTACHMENTS • Aerial map • Proposed Conditions map • Application materials and construction plans Aerial Map 0.02 acres 0.02 acres0.01 acres 2550 University Avenue W. | Suite 400N St. Paul, MN 55114 Main 651.644.4389 + Fax 713.965.0044 HRGREEN.COM May 29, 2025 Justin Fortney, City Planner City of Hastings 101 4th Street East Hastings, MN 55033 Sent via email to jfortney@hastingsmn.gov Re: MRCCA Vegetation Clearing and Land Disturbance Applications 5/28/25 Updates Dear Mr. Fortney: Please see the attached revised MRCCA Vegetation Clearing and Land Disturbance permit applications. This response dated May 29, 2025 includes responses to comments received in May 2025. The project will improve the condition and access of the Mississippi River Greenway (MRG) trail within the MRCCA corridor. The purpose of the project is to improve safety, resiliency, and accessibility for all MRG users accessing the MRCCA system through a trail reconstruction area and trail resurfacing. The trail reconstruction is needed to address non-compliant vertical grade, horizontal curve, and sight distance around the curves as detailed in the following applications. The project will involve grading and vegetation removal within the bluff impact zone (BIZ). However, it will mitigate land alteration and vegetation clearing impacts by restoring 2.3 acres of degraded habitat with invasive species to a managed 2.6-acre habitat restoration area of native tree, shrub and savannah prairie plantings. The project will improve the quality and quantity of adjacent vegetative communities. The goal of the replanting is to sustain and improve the natural character within the construction area to match existing and historic native communities. The project will incorporate wildlife friendly fencing and erosion control. Additionally, heavy construction will be timed to limit open cut conditions exposure to torrential rain events and limit closure impacts during the trail’s popular summer months. The applications show minimization efforts to reconstruct a section of the MRG trail and resurface adjacent sections for this important city and regional resource. We believe the preferred alignment shown represents the least amount of impact while obtaining the grades and sightlines needed for safe use of the trail. We understand the tree clearing and temporary closure of the trail is a concern for the project’s neighbors. Mailers have been sent regarding the tree clearing and project schedule to adjacent neighbors and the project website includes details on the proposed tree clearing at the project website. Variances We understand the project will require three variances for the MRCCA Vegetation Clearing and Land Disturbance permits. You requested additional detail on: a. What particular physical surroundings, shape or topographic conditions of the land involved, create a practical difficulty in this reasonable proposal?, b. Why can’t the proposal be reasonably accomplished under the current Ordinance requirements? and c. Why would these proposed variances not alter the essential character of the locality. These are answered below for each of the three variances. Page 2 of 3 May 29, 2025 1) Construction of a retaining wall in the BIZ for a purpose other than to correct an established erosion control problem as determined by the City. a. The trail needs to be lowered to meet trail grade and turn radius needs. To accomplish this a retaining wall offset from the existing retaining wall is required to limit further impacts to the BIZ. b. The purpose of the retaining wall is not erosion control and not allowed under the Ordinance requirements. c. The retaining wall will allow for an existing retaining wall to remain, allow for a tiered wall aesthetic, and the area will maintain a natural area character with native plantings. 2) Construction of a retaining wall greater than 5 feet in height for a purpose other than to correct an established erosion control problem as determined by the City. a. The height of the new wall is necessitated by the offset from the existing retaining wall and the elevation of the proposed trail. To keep separation between the existing and proposed retaining wall greater than 10 feet and to keep the slope between the walls at 1:6 or flatter, the wall height is 7 feet for portions of the wall. b. The purpose of the retaining wall is not erosion control and its required height is over 5 feet which are not allowed under the Ordinance requirements. c. The retaining wall will allow for an existing retaining wall to remain, allow for a tiered wall aesthetic, and the area will maintain a natural area character with native plantings. 3) Construction of a hard surface trail on greater than 30% slopes a. The project is in the location of an existing trail. The reconstructed trail needs to be in the same general location for the trail system to maintain its current function and connectivity to other trails. b. The Ordinance requirements do not allow paved trail construction on BIZ areas with greater than 30% slope. c. The general character of a trail through a natural area will be maintained. Schedule A proposed schedule for the project follows: May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 1 Submit MRCCA & Land Alteration Application 2 MRCCA Permit Application Review 3 Variance Process (est.) 4 MRCCA & Land Alteration Approval (est.) 5 Advertise Tree Clearing and Contract 6 Tree Clearing 7 SWPPP Tree Clearing Erosion Control Measures in Place 8 SWPPP Heavy Construction Erosion Control Measures 9 Trail Closure/Heavy Construction 10 Planting/Substantial Completion 11 Vegetation Montioring/Maintenance Anticipated Schedule for MRG Trail Design, MRCCA Permit Approval, and Construction Task 2025 2027-20292026 Page 3 of 3 May 29, 2025 The application includes this cover letter, MRCCA Vegetation Clearing and Land Disturbance permit applications, and the following exhibits. The applications and exhibits are bookmarked in the pdf application. A1: Existing and Proposed Conditions figure A2: Vegetative Communities and Photos A3: Vegetation Management Plan Figure A4: MRG Trail 100% Plans A5: Tree Clearing Plans A6: Resurfacing Plans A7; Engineers Statement Regarding Retaining Walls dated 5/28/25 B1: Previous Vegetative Clearing Application package submitted 1/30/25 Please let us know if you have any questions with your review. Sincerely, HR GREEN, INC. Ted McCaslin, AICP, PWS Lead Environmental Planner Cc: John Hinzman, City of Hastings; Mike Adams, Dakota County Greenways; Jordan Horejsi, HR Green 5/29/25 Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) – Vegetation Clearing Permit Application Directions. Within the MRCCA, all intensive vegetation clearing in Primary Conservation Areas (PCAs) requires a vegetation clearing permit and restoration plan. A complete permit application is needed to evaluate compliance with the city of Hastings’ vegetation clearing standards. Please review the Property Owner Guidance for Vegetation Clearing Permits before completing this application. Applicant Information Property Owner: Dakota County; Mike Adams, Greenways Senior Project Manager Contractor/Agent: Ted McCaslin (HR Green) Mailing Address: 14955 Galaxie Ave; Apple Valley, MN 55124 Mailing Address: 2550 University Ave. Suite 400N, St. Paul, MN, 55104 Phone: 651-5546538 Phone: 651-659-7708 Email: Mike.Adams@co.dakota.mn.us Email: tmccaslin@hrgreen.com Site information Site Address: N/A Parcel #: 196390000030, 190200077011, 196390002170, 196390002160, 196390002150, 196390002140, 196390002130, 196390002120, 196390002110, 196390002100 1. Identify the Primary Conservation Areas (PCAs) in which intensive vegetation clearing is proposed. View the DNR’s online PCA mapper to determine if your proposed clearing activity will occur in any of these PCAs (check all that apply). If none, do not complete this application. See Figure A1 for project areas within the following zones: ☒ Shore impact zone ☒ Areas within 50 feet of a wetland or natural drainage route ☒ Bluff impact zone ☒ Areas containing native plant communities ☒ Significant existing vegetative stands 2. Identify the purpose(s) of the proposed intensive vegetation clearing (check all that apply): ☐ Clearing of vegetation that is dead, diseased, dying, or hazardous ☐ Clearing to prevent the spread of diseases or insect pests ☒ Clearing to remove invasive non-native species ☐ Clearing to prepare for restoration and erosion control management activities consistent with a plan approved by the City of Hastings. ☒ The minimum clearing necessary for development allowed with a building permit or allowed as an exemption under Section 12 of Chapter section 152A, of the city of Hastings. Note: All other intensive vegetation clearing within PCAs is prohibited. 5/29/25 3. Explain how the proposed clearing is the minimum necessary and designed to blend with the natural terrain and minimize visual impacts to public river corridor views and other scenic views. If the clearing is required for development allowed with a permit, also explain how the project was located to minimize the removal or disturbance of natural vegetation: Click or tap here to enter text. The project is in the location of an existing trail with the minimum vegetation clearing necessary to construct the project. The design of the cut-section trail (lowered trail with tie-slopes angled up to match existing ground, see Figure 2) minimizes the impact to the surrounding vegetation. Side slopes of the trail were designed between 1:2 and 1:3 wherever practical to limit the impact on tree clearing and earthwork. If the tie-slopes were graded out flatter or horizontally to match in the existing slope to the river, the vegetative clearing area would be significantly greater than the proposed design. Figure 1 – Cross section showing the proposed cut section vs grading to the existing slope (red line) in the BIZ There is a section of the proposed design that has a flatter tie-in grading to the existing slope instead of the cut-section design. This was chosen for a few reasons including perpetuating existing drainage patterns, a more natural slope design, and very minimal difference in grading impacts. Figure 2 shows the graded tie-slope vs a cut-section design (red line) for a short segment of the MRG Trail There are no water quality BMPs on this linear project, but rather sump catch basin structures were leveraged to provide sediment control in the corridor and limit the project footprint. This design limits the need for vegetation clearing and blends with the existing landscape using existing drainage features. The existing trail overlook was shortened significantly to reduce the overall 5/29/25 impervious pavement of the project and align the overlook location with the best view of the Mississippi River and lock and dam. The removed segment of bituminous trail provides approximately 2,800 square feet of area that will be leveraged to plant natives to match the historical vegetation. 4. Describe (and attach photo of) the vegetation being removed (ground cover, understory, tree), and names of plants, if known: Vegetation along the trail reconstruction area was identified and divided into 10 generalized plant communities. Areas of the communities are in the table below. See the Exhibit A2 Vegetation Communities. Map ID Community Type Square Feet in Clear Area Acres in Clear Area 1 Brome Unmaintained 4339 0.100 2 Cedar/Siberian Elm Dominant 27346 0.628 3 Disturbed not vegetated area 859 0.020 4 Maintained Turfgrass 16557 0.380 5 Mixed spruce and pine 1391 0.032 6 Mixed switchgrass, cedar, prickly ash 18056 0.415 7 Oak, Maple, Cottonwood, Ironwood 3056 0.070 8 Ornamental Shrubs 259 0.006 9 Sparse Cedar/Cottonwood 236 0.005 10 Sumac/Buckthorn 2836 0.065 TOTAL 74934 1.720 5. Explain how vegetation removal activities will be conducted or phased in order to expose the smallest area of soil to erosion for the least possible time: The initial phase project action is to cut trees prior to April 1, 2025 to limit potential impacts to protected bats and maintain a project a construction schedule during the bat presence season (roughly April 1 – October 31). The initial tree clearing will cut trees, but no grubbing of roots ground disturbance will occur outside of tree removal equipment movement. Any disturbance will be stabilized by temporary turf establishment and placement of wood chips on disturbed areas. Silt fence and storm drain inlet protection will occur prior to the tree clearing. See Exhibit A5 Tree Clearing Plans. Exhibit A4 100% Plans shows the more intensive grading phase of the project. Intensive ground disturbance will only occur with the grading phase. 6. Identify the restoration priority areas on your property (check all that apply and show on submitted aerial photo or site plan): ☒ Areas with soils showing signs of erosion, especially on or near the top and bottom of steep slopes and bluffs ☐ Shoreline areas within 25 of the water with no natural vegetation, degraded vegetation, or planted with turf grass. 5/29/25 ☒ Areas on steep slopes and bluffs that are visible from the river with no natural vegetation, degraded vegetation, or planted with turf grass. ☐ None of the above exist. The following restoration opportunity area is proposed instead: See restoration plan details below. Restoration Plan Performance Standards. All activities requiring a vegetation clearing permit require a planting plan that must meet the following standards: · Restored vegetation is planted in one or more of the restoration priority areas or opportunity areas identified under #6. · Restored vegetation provides suitable habitat, and effective soil stability, runoff retention, and infiltration capability to address concerns specific to the priority or opportunity area. · If any highly erodible soils are disturbed during removal and/or restoration, they are stabilized by deep-rooted vegetation with a high stem density. · The area (sq. ft.) of the restored vegetation is similar to that removed to the greatest extent practicable. · For restoration of removed native plant communities (identified under #1), restored vegetation must also provide biological and ecological function equivalent to the removed native plant communities. Vegetation species, composition, density, and diversity must be guided by nearby patches of native plant communities. The area (sq. ft.) of the restored vegetation should be equivalent to that removed. Submittal Requirements. Submit all of the following along with this application form: ☒ An aerial photo and/or site plan showing:  Property boundaries  Location and label of existing PCAs identified under #1  The location and area (sq. ft.) of the vegetation proposed to be cleared within identified PCAs  Location and area (sq. ft.) of the restored vegetation in the priority areas identified under #6 See attached ☒ Photos of the vegetation proposed for removal. See attached ☒ A planting plan(s) for the identified restoration priority area(s) showing the location, type (ground cover, understory, tree), and name of proposed plants. A plant list with codes referencing plants shown on the plan is suggested for complex plans. Property owners may complete their own planting plan, provided the submitted plan meets the relevant performance standards. If the plan does not meet the standards, a qualified landscape professional recognized by the city of Hastings will be needed. See attached Exhibit A3 and Turf Establishment Plans in Sheets 24-36 of Exhibit A4 100% Plans. Additional details are described here: · All trail buffer areas within 2.5 feet of the bituminous trail edge are assumed to have a turf mix (low-maintenance fescue mix suggested). Cover crop will depend on seed installation timing; Oats are for spring seeding, winter wheat for late fall seeding. 5/29/25 · Temporary stabilization mixes containing perennial rye, red clover, alfalfa, and/or birdsfoot trefoil are prohibited – contractors who install mixes will be asked to spray out and reseed with the desired seed mix at their own cost. · The 0.3 ac area designated “Oak Savanna” is a simplified version of the Tree and Shrub matrix planting, in that it would consist only of white and bur oaks could be planted at ~50ft intervals. Both these woody species planting plans would be planted after the seed mix had been installed / blanketed. · Ideally, larger caliper (ball & burlap and >#5 containerized) trees should be protected with tree tubes and watering bags. Seed Mixes MIX RATE ( PLS lbs / ac) with 60 lbs/ac cover crop (oats/ww) Area Upland Prairie Mix 74 1.22 ac Shady Woodland Mix 70.1 0.70 ac Upland Prairie Seed Mix Graminoids Scientific Name Common Name Net # seeds/s.f. oz/acre PLS oz PLS lb Andropogon gerardii big bluestem 7.80 33.98 41.6 2.12 Bouteloua curtipendula side-oats grama 8.13 58.99 72.2 3.69 Bouteloua gracilis blue grama 3.25 10.62 13.0 0.22 Bromus kalmii kalm's brome 0.10 0.54 0.7 0.04 Elymus canadensis nodding wild rye 3.90 32.67 40.0 2.04 Elymus trachycaulus slender wheatgrass 0.20 1.26 1.5 0.10 Elytrigia smithii western wheatgrass 0.10 0.61 0.7 0.05 Koeleria pyramidata junegrass 0.80 0.17 0.2 0.01 Panicum oligosanthes Scribner's panic grass 0.24 1.16 1.4 0.09 Schizachyrium scoparium little bluestem 13.65 39.64 48.6 2.48 Sorghastrum nutans Indian grass 0.28 1.02 1.2 0.08 Sporobolus heterolepis prairie dropseed 0.48 1.31 1.6 0.10 Forbs Scientific Name Common Name Net # seeds/s.f. oz/acre PLS oz PLS lb Agastache foeniculum blue giant hyssop 0.48 0.23 0.3 0.02 5/29/25 Allium stellatum Prairie Wild Onion 0.28 1.11 1.4 0.08 Amorpha canescens lead plant 0.42 1.50 1.8 0.11 Anemone cylindrica long-headed thimbleweed 0.40 0.67 0.8 0.05 Anemone patens pasque flower 0.32 0.77 0.9 0.06 Antennaria neglecta field pussytoes 1.08 0.11 0.1 0.01 Antennaria plantaginifolia plantain-leaved pussytoes 0.92 0.15 0.2 0.01 Artemisia ludoviciana prairie sage 0.80 0.14 0.2 0.01 Asclepias syriaca common milkweed 0.06 0.65 0.8 0.05 Asclepias tuberosa butterfly milkweed 0.16 1.62 2.0 0.12 Asclepias verticillata whorled milkweed 0.28 1.11 1.4 0.08 Aster ericoides heath aster 0.40 0.09 0.1 0.01 Aster oolentangiensis skyblue aster 0.56 0.30 0.4 0.02 Astragalus canadensis Canada milk vetch 0.32 0.82 1.0 0.06 Astragalus crassicarpus ground plum 0.08 0.67 0.8 0.05 Campanula rotundifolia harebell 0.92 0.04 0.1 0.00 Coreopsis palmata bird's foot coreopsis 0.36 1.57 1.9 0.12 Dalea candida white prairie clover 0.48 1.10 1.3 0.08 Dalea purpurea purple prairie clover 1.30 3.84 4.7 0.29 Delphinium virescens Carolina delphinium 0.24 0.17 0.2 0.01 Desmodium canadense Canada tick trefoil 0.16 1.27 1.6 0.10 Gentiana puberulenta downy gentian 1.12 0.11 0.1 0.01 Geum triflorum prairie smoke 0.60 0.97 1.2 0.07 Helianthus pauciflorus stiff sunflower 0.18 1.96 2.4 0.15 Heliopsis helianthoides ox-eye 0.20 1.38 1.7 0.11 Lespedeza capitata round-headed bush clover 0.30 1.63 2.0 0.13 Liatris aspera rough blazing star 0.48 1.31 1.6 0.10 Liatris punctata dotted blazing star 0.30 1.87 2.3 0.14 Monarda fistulosa wild bergamot 0.48 0.30 0.4 0.02 Oenothera biennis common evening primrose 0.52 0.25 0.3 0.02 Pediomelum esculentum prairie turnip 0.12 4.75 5.8 0.36 5/29/25 Potentilla arguta tall cinquefoil 0.84 0.16 0.2 0.01 Ratibida pinnata gray-headed coneflower 0.40 0.58 0.7 0.04 Rosa arkansana prairie rose 0.04 1.94 2.4 0.15 Rudbeckia hirta black-eyed susan 0.60 0.28 0.3 0.02 Sisyrinchium campestre field blue-eyed grass 0.40 0.39 0.5 0.03 Solidago nemoralis gray goldenrod 0.92 0.13 0.2 0.01 Solidago ptarmicoides upland white aster 0.48 0.33 0.4 0.03 Solidago rigida stiff goldenrod 0.40 0.42 0.5 0.03 Tradescantia bracteata bracted spiderwort 0.24 1.05 1.3 0.08 Verbena stricta hoary vervain 0.20 0.31 0.4 0.02 Viola pedatifida bearded birdfoot violet 0.20 0.31 0.4 0.02 Zizia aptera heart-leaved alexanders 0.14 0.51 0.6 0.04 Shady Woodland Mix Graminoids Scientific Name Common Name Net # seeds/ s.f. Oz/ acre Lb/ acre Andropogon gerardii big bluestem 4.05 17.6 1.10 Bouteloua curtipendula side-oats grama 0.625 4.5 0.28 Bromus kalmii kalm's brome 1.13 6.1 0.38 Carex brevior short sedge 1.25 1.9 0.12 Carex pensylvanica Pennsylvania sedge 1.5 2.2 0.14 Carex sprengelii Sprengel's sedge 0.75 3.3 0.20 Dalea purpurea purple prairie clover 2.25 6.5 0.41 Elymus canadensis nodding wild rye 2.70 22.6 1.41 Elymus hystrix bottlebrush grass 4.50 25.8 1.61 Juncus tenuis path rush 6.25 0.3 0.02 Schizachyrium scoparium little bluestem 6.30 18.3 1.14 Sorghastrum nutans Indian grass 6.30 22.9 1.43 Sporobolus heterolepis prairie dropseed 0.4 1.1 0.07 5/29/25 Forbs Scientific Name Common Name Net # seeds/ s.f. Oz/ acre Lb/ acre Achillea millefolium common yarrow 0.8 0.2 0.01 Agastache foeniculum blue giant hyssop 0.6 0.3 0.02 Amorpha canescens lead plant 0.5 1.8 0.11 Anemone virginiana tall thimbleweed 0.5 0.8 0.05 Aquilegia canadensis columbine 0.5 0.6 0.04 Artemisia ludoviciana prairie sage 1 0.2 0.01 Astragalus canadensis Canada milk vetch 0.4 1.0 0.06 Campanula americana tall bellflower 0.95 0.2 0.02 Campanula rotundifolia harebell 2.3 0.1 0.01 Cryptotaenia canadensis Honewort 0.25 1.6 0.10 Eutrochium purpureum sweet Joe pye weed 0.5 0.5 0.03 Geranium maculatum wild geranium 0.5 4.4 0.27 Helianthus pauciflorus stiff sunflower 0.12 1.3 0.08 Heliopsis helianthoides ox-eye 0.625 4.3 0.27 Heuchera richardsonii alumroot 5 0.3 0.02 Monarda fistulosa wild bergamot 1.5 0.9 0.06 Osmorhiza claytonii Clayton's sweet cicely 0.15 2.6 0.16 Rudbeckia hirta black-eyed susan 1.25 0.6 0.04 Scrophularia lanceolata Lance-leaved Figwort 2 0.5 0.03 Solidago flexicaulis zigzag goldenrod 0.7 0.4 0.02 Solidago nemoralis gray goldenrod 1.15 0.2 0.01 Solidago rigida stiff goldenrod 0.5 0.5 0.03 Symphyotrichum ericoides heath aster 0.8 0.2 0.01 Symphyotrichum laeve smooth aster 0.5 0.4 0.02 Thalictrum dioicum early meadow-rue 0.25 1.5 0.09 Zizia aptera heart-leaved alexanders 0.875 3.2 0.20 Canopy Trees & Understory Trees Quercus alba White oak Quercus macrocarpa Bur oak Quercus rubra Northern red oak 5/29/25 Ulmus americana American elm Understory Trees Ostrya virginiana Ironwood Prunus serotina Black cherry Tilia americana Basswood Shrubs Amelanchier interior Juneberry Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry Cornus alternifolia Pagoda dogwood Cornus racemosa Gray dogwood Corylus americana American hazelnut Diervilla lonicera Bush honeysuckle Prunus virginiana Chokecherry Rosa arkansana Prairie rose Rosa blanda Smooth wild rose Sambucus racemosa Red-berried Elder Symphoricarpos alba Snowberry Viburnum lentago Nannyberry For large, complex projects, also provide: These items to be provided with final design submittal ☒ Planting plan completed by a qualified person as defined by the city of Hastings ☒ Scaled plans, surveys, and drawings. ☒ A three-year maintenance plan that includes provisions for controlling invasive species and plant replacement. Native Vegetation Maintenance Plan Establishment and Enhancement Herbicide and Applicators · Herbicide applicators must be state-certified. · DNR Operational Order 59 (Pesticides and Pest Control: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/assistance/grants/habitat/heritage/oporder_59.pdf) and appropriate discipline guidelines must be followed when working on all lands and waters, regardless of ownership. · Herbicide application must follow industry standards for temperature and weather conditions, according to label directions and the State of MN Commercial Pesticide Applicator Manual. · Use least toxic herbicide or formula with lowest soil residual; Glyphosate is preferred. (Milestone or Transline is suitable for legumes, but CONTRACTOR must first consult with DAKOTA COUNTY before applying these herbicides.) Aquatic formula is required when applying within 100 feet of a wetland. · Surfactants added to herbicides mixes applied on or near water must be non-ionic (e.g., Activator 90, Agri-Dex). · As much as possible, herbicides should be applied when there is some biological activity in the plant (e.g. Apr-Nov). · Avoid windy days and ensure a rain-free period of at least 3 hours after application. 5/29/25 · Take maximum care to avoid chemical drift or contact with non-target plants. In native prairie areas, invasives should be spot-treated by wick application if feasible or with a backpack sprayer. Do not treat plants if doing so is likely to hit conservative (Conservation Coefficient of 4 or greater, as designated by University of Wisconsin) native plants. · In high quality areas, as designated by DAKOTA COUNTY Natural Resource Staff, check with DAKOTA COUNTY staff before applying herbicides. · A copy of the record of all pesticide/herbicide applications shall be submitted to DAKOTA COUNTY. Submitting records with invoices is acceptable. Non-native forbs - prairie · Prevent herbicide drift to adjacent plants. o Manage all herbaceous species listed in Herbaceous Exotic Species List (Attachment C), and all others as detected. Species shall be managed by the CONTRACTOR such that seedset is reduced or eliminated and the ability of the plant to compete with desirable vegetation is greatly reduced. Some species (discuss with DAKOTA COUNTY) will be dealt with aggressively by CONTRACTOR, with a final goal of eradication of these species from the restored areas of this park during the contract period. Prepare Work Area and Install Native Seed: Work Area Preparation: Remove/kill invasive/weedy vegetation (including species in Attachment B and C) prior to installing native seed. If area to be seeded was treated with herbicide, contractor shall follow all label requirements for seeding. Prescribed burning may be an acceptable component of Work Area preparation. A suitable seedbed must be prepared and approved by the County Representative prior to seed installation. Seeding: Dakota County will provide all seed for this project. Seeding shall be preferentially conducted as a late fall dormant seeding (after October 15, but before the soil starts to freeze) or in early spring (as soon as the soil is free of frost and in a workable condition but no later than June 10). Where obstructions (e.g., trees) are absent or limited, and slopes allow, install seed with broadcast seeder in two directions, perpendicular to one another. Areas that cannot be broadcast with equipment may be hand broadcast seeded using a mechanical seeder that can evenly disperse all, including fluffy, seed. Prior to hand broadcasting, seed shall be divided into two equal parts. The entire area shall be sown with first half before spreading second half, using two perpendicular passes. All seed shall be spread evenly throughout seeding zones. Within 24 hours, or as soon as Work Area conditions permit, hand broadcast seeded areas shall be rolled with a cultipacker perpendicular to the slope, or alternatively, raked in to ensure good seed-to-soil contact. Establishment Management of Prairie/Savanna Seeded Areas Timing: 5/29/25 For Prairie and Savanna seeded areas, the Establishment Management period begins immediately following Preparing Work Area and Installing Seed) respectively. Activities: Establishment Mowing: Establishment mowings will occur following installation of native seed for the establishment of prairie or oak savanna. At no time is the vegetation to be taller than 12”, and mowing height shall be no less than 6”. Do not allow vegetation to grow so tall that it smothers growth when cut. Do not mow immediately after rain when cut vegetation will clump. Performance Standards Restoration /Enhancement Task Checkpoint 1: Performance Standards Checkpoint 2 Performance Standards Corrective Measures Task: Prepare Work Area and Install Native Seed Undesirable species have been adequately controlled and the seedbed has been appropriately prepared prior to seed installation. 100% of areas designated to receive seed have been seeded. No 2nd checkpoint Task:. Establishment Management/Invasive Species Management For Prairie and Savanna seeded areas: For the growing season following seed installation: For all species listed in Attachments B and C: Less than 5% cover to set seed within any 100 sq m area. More than 95% of target species in Attachments B and C are spot treated with herbicide within any 100 sq m area. If there is bare ground present in seeded areas (>= 1 sq. m), these areas must be re-seeded by Contractor. Random sample contains at least 1 native forb and 3 native grass seedlings per square meter. Establishment mowings or spot mowings occurred at a height and frequency appropriate for establishing native seed and preventing invasive/weedy species from seedset. At no time is the vegetation to be taller than 16”, and For Prairie and Savanna seeded areas: For subsequent growing seasons: For all species listed in Attachments B and C: less than 2.5% cover to set seed within any 100 sq. m area. More than 98% of target species in Attachments B and C are spot treated with herbicide within any 100 sq m area. Establishment mowings or spot mowings occurred at a height and frequency appropriate for establishing vegetation. At no time is the vegetation to be taller than 16”, and mowing height shall be no less than 6”. In the final year or at any time during the establishment period, the Contractor and County Representative may come to mutual If mowing results in any clumping, smothering of new growth, or if ruts are formed, CONTRACTOR will CEASE activity until conditions improve. If detriment has already occurred, CONTRACTOR will take measure to mitigate, including re- doing site preparation and seeding if necessary at soonest appropriate time, and mitigating rutting damage. 5/29/25 mowing height shall be no less than 6”. agreement that establishment mowings are no longer necessary. For restoration of native plant communities, also provide: ☒ Identification of the type and location of nearby native plant communities used to guide restoration. Nearby plant communities are generalized into ten plant communities described in Item 4 above and Exhibit A2. Furthermore: · Native woods are primarily located below the bluff line and adjacent to the Mississippi River comprised of oak species (red, white, and bur observed), basswood, ironwood, native elms · Areas of native switchgrass interspersed with cedar and prickly ash are likely remnant from the initial trail construction in 1999-2000. · Disturbed woods primarily located inside of the trail’s hairpin turn and above the bluff line comprised of mostly of Siberian elm, buckthorn and cedar but with interspersed native red oak, bur oak, basswood, and ironwood. Disturbed woods are mainly in current forested areas shown as disturbed and treeless in this 1957 aerial photo comparison. 5/29/25 Signatures I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I grant the city of Hastings officials permission to enter the subject property for inspection of the vegetation removal and restoration sites during normal business hours until three years from the date of the certificate of completion. This is to insure adherence to the maintenance conditions of the permit. I understand failure to conform to approved plans and conditions or to comply with lawful directives to abate violations arising from work undertaken contrary to this permit may be cause for future enforcement actions to remedy said violations. Property owner signature: Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Contractor signature (if applicable): Date: 5/29/2025 5/29/25 Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) – Land Alteration Permit Application Directions. Within the MRCCA, land alterations in certain areas require a permit. A complete permit application is needed to evaluate compliance with the city of Hastings’ land alteration standards. Projects that involve vegetation removal may also require the completion of a separate MRCCA vegetation clearing permit application. Please review the Property Owner Guidance for Land Alteration Permits before completing this application. Applicant Information Property Owner: Dakota County; Mike Adams, Greenways Senior Project Manager Contractor/Agent: Ted McCaslin (HR Green) Mailing Address: 14955 Galaxie Ave; Apple Valley, MN 55124 Mailing Address: 2550 University Ave. Suite 400N, St. Paul, MN, 55104 Phone: 651-5546538 Phone: 651-659-7708 Email: Mike.Adams@co.dakota.mn.us Email: tmccaslin@hrgreen.com Site information Site Address: Click or tap here to enter text. Or Parcel #: 196390000030, 190200077011, 196390002170, 196390002160, 196390002150, 196390002140, 196390002130, 196390002120, 196390002110, 196390002100 Type of land alteration project A land alteration permit is required for the following activities in riparian areas and the bluff impact zone (see table in Property Owner Guidance for Land Alteration Permits for riparian areas subject to permit requirements). Please indicate the type of land alteration project being proposed (check all that apply). If none, a land alterations permit is not required and this application is not needed. ☒ Land disturbance of more than 10 cubic yards or an area greater than 1,000 square feet in riparian areas. Land alteration in the shoreland impact zone is 5,663 square feet/0.13 acres. ☒ Construction or replacement of riprap, retaining walls and other erosion control structures in riparian areas and/or the bluff impact zone. (Repair of existing erosion control structures above the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) does not require a permit if it does not involve any land alteration or disturbance.) Checked for non erosion control purposed retaining wall construction See Exhibit A1. ☐ Erosion control developed under a plan approved by the City of Hastings or a resource agency, in the bluff impact zone. 5/29/25 ☒ Access paths, stairways, lifts, and landings, and other development allowed as an exemption in the bluff impact zone under Section 12 of Ordinance Section 152A of the city of Hastings. See hard-surface path discussion below. ☒ Repair and maintenance of existing buildings and facilities in the bluff impact zone. The project will repair and maintain the Mississippi River Greenway within the BIZ. All other land alteration activities in the bluff impact zone are prohibited. Submittal Requirements. Submit all of the following along with this application form: ☒ A brief project description. The proposed project will reconstruct a degrading and design insufficient portion of the Mississippi River Greenway (MRG) Trail and resurface MRG sections along the adjacent dam and CL Jaycee Park Trail. This reconstruction portion will be graded down to a meet American Disability Act (ADA) design standards and improve safety versus the current trail alignment. The proposed project will involve the construction of a retaining wall within the Bluff Impact Zone (BIZ) and prairie and forest restoration. ☒ An aerial photo and/or site plan showing:  Property boundaries  Location and label of riparian areas and/or the bluff impact zone  The location of the proposed land alteration area, including the outer grading limits. See Exhibits A1 and A4. For riprap, retaining Walls or other erosion control structures, also submit the following: ☒ Photos showing that an established erosion problem exists. See photos in Exhibit A2 and B1. ☒ Explanation that the proposed structures are the minimum necessary to correct the problem. See retaining wall description below. ☐ Construction plans showing consistency with the following design standards:  For retaining walls, the walls must not exceed five feet in height and must be placed a minimum horizontal distance of ten feet apart.  For shoreline riprap, the height must not be higher than the regulatory flood protection elevation (RFPE). ☒ For retaining walls and rip rap exceeding these design standards, submit design drawings and a statement by a professional engineer testifying that a larger structure is needed to correct the erosion problem. 5/29/25 The proposed retaining wall is a maximum of 7 feet in height. This larger structure will limit the grading required for the MRG improvements, preserve the existing retaining wall, and allow for ADA compliant trail to be constructed. See Sheet 15 in the Exhibit A4 100% Plans. The change in trail elevation is 8 feet in the lower tangent portion of the trail and affected the alignment of the trail adjacent to the existing retaining wall. Keeping the trail on the same alignment with a lowered elevation would require removal of the existing trail and then construction of a 20- foot-tall retaining wall. By shifting the trail away from the existing retaining wall, the proposed wall can be constructed in front of the existing retaining wall, that is 7 feet tall at its tallest point, giving a tiered wall aesthetic with approximately 15 feet of vegetation between the walls. Reconstructing a 20-foot-tall high wall would have had significant impact to the cost of the project and would have had impacts to vegetation behind the wall for grading and construction. ☐ For projects involving work below the Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL), an email or permit from the DNR documenting approval of work below the OHWL. For activities in the bluff impact zone, also submit the following: ☒ For access paths, stairways, lifts, and landings, and other developments allowed as an exception under Section 12, explain how the project was designed, phased or sited to minimize land alteration. If not applicable, state so. A trail currently exists in the BIZ within the proposed land alteration impact area. Alternate routing was investigated for trail routing that would still meet the purpose of the project to improve safety, resiliency, and accessibility for all MRG users accessing the MRCCA system. Alternate routes minimizing impacts the BIZ were reviewed and no viable alternative routes were identified due to bluff slopes, greater vegetation and land alteration impacts within the MRCCA, significant rerouting of the MRG, and property concerns. Accommodating vertical and turning radius improvements along the existing trail corridor is required for these improvements. Within the reconstruction impact area land alteration will be minimized by the construction of a new retaining wall and protective fencing. The proposed trail location will preserve an existing retaining wall, limit impacts to the south of the existing retaining wall, and limit visual impacts for the proposed project. Also, the proposed trail will eliminate maintenance and safety concerns associated with a 20- foot-tall new retaining wall that would be required in place of the minor impact of the proposed hard- surface trail over the area with slopes exceeding 30%. Approximately 2,125 square feet of the proposed path along 410 linear feet of the hard surface of the reconstructed trail are proposed on existing slopes exceeding 30% within the BIZ. See Exhibit A4 Sheets 9-15 red hatched area in Cross Sections STA 119+00 – 121+50 showing hard surface area exceeding 30% slopes. Dakota County understands this element of the proposed trail reconstruction is not exempt per Section 12 of Ordinance Section 152A and 152A.08.G.3.a. “Hard-surface trails are not allowed on the face of bluffs with a slope exceeding 30%.” ☐ For erosion control developed under a plan approved by the city of Hastings or a resource agency, submit the approved plan. In this situation, if the above submittal requirements are included in the plan, then the above items do not need to be submitted separately. 5/29/25 Signatures I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand failure to conform to approved plans and conditions or to comply with lawful directives to abate violations arising from work undertaken contrary to this permit may be cause for future enforcement actions to remedy said violations. Property owner signature: Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Contractor signature (if applicable): Date: 5/29/2025 0.02 acres 0.02 acres0.01 acres FIGURE A1EXHIBIT A1 Exhibit A2 Survey: Hastings MRCCA Photos Region: General Field Observation  Generated with Sampling Point: N/A 1. Brome Unmaintained area Smooth brome with crab apple and swamp white oak planting. Vegetation left to the cedar (dark green evergreen at left of photo) will be removed. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75499166, -92.87993888 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:12 PM CST N 764 Elevationin feet Sampling Point: N/A 2. Cedar/Siberian Elm Dominant The most common plant community in the trail reconstruction area. This area west of the intersection at south end of reconstruction area will be completely removed. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75453333, -92.87954166 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:07 PM CST N 771 Elevationin feet Survey: Hastings MRCCA Photos Region: General Field Observation  Generated with Sampling Point: N/A 3. Disturbed not vegetated area Eroded hillslope. Vegetation will be removed to top of small hill visible in photo. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75517777, -92.87956111 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:14 PM CST N 748 Elevationin feet Sampling Point: N/A 3. Disturbed not vegetated area Mixed glacial till and sand on unvegetated hillslope. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75528888, -92.87953055 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:16 PM CST N 761 Elevationin feet Survey: Hastings MRCCA Photos Region: General Field Observation  Generated with Sampling Point: N/A 4. Maintained turfgrass Turfgrass in front of retaining wall. Vegetation removal not proposed in in front or behind retaining wall. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75464722, -92.87811388 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:25 PM CST N 735 Elevationin feet Sampling Point: N/A 5. Mixed Spruce and pine at right of photo Looking east at overlook/dead end area. No vegetation removal proposed. Trail will be demolished and replanted with native trees and shrubs. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75463055, -92.87862777 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:02 PM CST N 758 Elevationin feet Survey: Hastings MRCCA Photos Region: General Field Observation  Generated with Sampling Point: N/A 6. Mixed switchgrass, cedar, prickly ash Mixed switchgrass dominant area with smaller cedar and prickly ash. Switchgrass likely planted with initial trail construction approximately 25 years ago. Vegetation removal will occur throughout this area. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75463333, -92.87976944 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:10 PM CST N 768 Elevationin feet Sampling Point: N/A 7. Oak, Maple, Cottonwood, Ironwood Silver maple, red oak, eastern cottonwood, ironwood on river side of bluff line. Minimal vegetation removal will occur below the bluff line to accommodate the proposed retaining wall. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.754825, -92.87851388 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:23 PM CST N 745 Elevationin feet Survey: Hastings MRCCA Photos Region: General Field Observation  Generated with Sampling Point: N/A 8. Sparse cedar/cottonwood Snowy area above retaining wall visible from dam. Contrast highlights snow. No vegetation removal proposed in this area. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75499444, -92.87700555 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 4:10 PM CST N 702 Elevationin feet Sampling Point: N/A 9. Sumac/Buckthorn Buckthorn and sumac adjacent to trail fence. Minimal vegetation removal proposed in this area. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75453888, -92.87762222 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:27 PM CST N 725 Elevationin feet Survey: Hastings MRCCA Photos Region: General Field Observation  Generated with Sampling Point: N/A View from dam near Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75526111, -92.87628611 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 4:01 PM CST N 712 Elevationin feet Sampling Point: N/A View from dam trail halfway Retaining wall and houses along Riverbluff Drive apparent. Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75627777, -92.87447222 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:58 PM CST N 712 Elevationin feet Survey: Hastings MRCCA Photos Region: General Field Observation  Generated with Sampling Point: N/A View from other side of dam Direction Lat Lon from photo 44.75871388, -92.87023888 Photo date: Sun, Feb 23, 2025 3:51 PM CST N 711 Elevationin feet 42 21 REFINERY Lake 61CO17 0 . 3 Rebecca Conley U.S. LOCK & DAM NO. 2 SHEET NO.OF SHEETS DAKOTA COUNTY CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR 1 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : M o d e l : Ti t l e S h e e t [ S h e e t ] F i l e : \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 0 0 t s h . d g n 1500' PLAN PROFILE HORIZ.VERT. 40' VAR100' INDEX 20 20APPROVED APPROVED 26 THIS PLAN CONTAINS SHEETS26 1 - 4 7 9 SHEET NO.DESCRIPTION DESIGN SQUAD SIGNATURE: PRINT NAME: DATE: LICENSE # I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS SCALES INDEX MAP COUNTY PROJECT LOCATION : DATE SHEET NO. PLAN REVISIONS APPROVED BY 2/28/2025 P: 651.644.4389 F: 713.965.0044 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-2015 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN. THE 2020 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD GRADING, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, ADA IMPROVEMENTS, RETAINING WALL DAKOTA COUNTY PROJECT MANAGER CITY OF HASTINGS PROJECT AREA GABRIEL FROMM, BRETT JOHNSON DAKOTA KENDAL RUSTEN, CONNER DUNTEMAN JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 15 MISSISSIPPI RIVER GREENWAY TRAIL 0.3 MILES NORTH WEST OF COUNTY RD 42 AND PLEASANT DRLOCATED ON 100% PLANS CROSS SECTIONS TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS EROSION CONTROL PLANS PREVENTION PLAN STORM WATER POLLUTION DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROFILES RETAINING WALL PLAN AND PROFILE CONSTRUCTION PROFILES CONSTRUCTION PLANS REMOVAL PLANS ALIGNMENT PLANS AND TABULATIONS TYPICAL SECTIONS AND STANDARD PLATES CONSTRUCTION NOTES, STANDARD PLANS STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES GENERAL LAYOUT TITLE SHEET 2 3 5 6 - -10 12 13 14 -16 17 -21 23 -24 26 -X1 X22 -18 20 400'GENERAL LAYOUT EXHIBIT A4 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : Ge n e r a l L a y o u t - G E L 4 0 0 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 0 5 g e l . d g n 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH REMOVAL PLAN CONSTRUCTION PLAN EROSION CONTROL PERM. TURF ESTABLISHMENT & LANDSCAPE PLAN LEGEND XX XX XX XX 2623 2522 2421 107 8 11 9 12 STA. 2+47.40 END OVERLOOK CONSTRUCTION STA. 0+00.00 BEGIN OVERLOOK CONSTRUCTION CL OVERLOOK TRAIL STA. 109+29.45 BEGIN RECONSTRUCTION END MILL AND OVERLAY STA. 100+12.25 BEGIN MILL AND OVERLAY STA. 124+59.60 BEGIN MILL AND OVERLAY END RECONSTRUCTION STA. 147+19.66 END MILL AND OVERLAY STA. 227+02.53 END MILL AND OVERLAY STA. 200+47.16 BEGIN MILL AND OVERLAY CL MRG TRAIL EAGLE BLUFF DRIVE CSAH 42 - NININGER ROAD P LE A S A N T D RI V E LOCK AND DAM ROAD 100 1051101 15 0 200 205 210 215 2 20 225 CL JAYCEE PARK TRAIL 120 125 130 13 5 14 0 14 5 GENERAL LAYOUT 1 1 2 400 SCALE IN FEET F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : E S T 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 1 0 e s t . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH SHEET NO TAB ITEM NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION NOTES UNIT TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY 2011.601 AS BUILT LUMP SUM 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 2051.501 MAINT. & RESTORATION OF HAUL ROADS LUMP SUM 2101.505 GRUBBING ACRE 2104.502 REMOVE VEHICULAR GATE EACH 2104.502 REMOVE MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN EACH 2104.502 REMOVE SIGN TYPE C EACH 2104.502 SALVAGE PICNIC TABLE EACH 2104.502 SALVAGE BENCH EACH 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 2104.503 REMOVE PIPE SEWERS LIN FT 2104.503 REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 2104.503 REMOVE MANHOLES OR CATCH BASINS LIN FT 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH)LIN FT 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SQ YD 2104.518 REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB SQ FT 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON CU YD 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 CU YD 2232.504 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (3.0")SQ YD 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2, B)TON 2411.618 PREFABRICATED MODULAR BLOCK WALL SQ FT 2502.503 4" PERF TP PIPE DRAIN LIN FT 2503.503 12" PVC PIPE SEWER LIN FT 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER EACH 2503.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING MANHOLES EACH 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN H EACH 2506.502 CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE DESIGN 48-4020 EACH 2506.502 ADJUST FRAME & RING CASTING EACH 2540.602 INSTALL PICNIC TABLE EACH 2540.602 INSTALL BENCH EACH 2540.602 INSTALL BENCH EACH 2571.502 PERENNIAL EACH 2573.502 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION EACH 2573.502 CULVERT END CONTROLS EACH 2573.503 SILT FENCE; TYPE HI LIN FT 2575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 20 SQ YD 2575.504 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION CATEGORY 25 SQ YD 2575.605 SEEDING ACRE 2575.608 SEED WINTER WHEAT POUND 2575.608 SEED MESIC INSLOPE POUND ESTIMATED QUANTITIES 1 1 26 3 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE ALL LAND, AND PROPERTY CORNERS, VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CONTROLS, AND RIGHT OF WAY MONUMENTS. SURVEYS AND RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION NOTES: GRADING TEMPORARY TURF ESTABLISHMENT EXISTING TOPSOIL AND SLOPE DRESSING PERMANENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT 2573, 2575, AND AS AMENDED BY THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. WILL CONTROL EROSION. RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING EROSION IS SET FORTH IN MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS 1717, 1803, 2101, 2105, USE. THIS DOES NOT, HOWEVER, RELIEVE THE CONTRACTOR OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES TO CONDUCT THEIR CONSTRUCTION IN A MANNER THAT TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND THEIR SUGGESTED LOCATIONS HAVE BEEN SHOWN IN THE PLANS ALONG WITH PAY ITEMS FOR THEIR GRADING GRADE IS DEFINED AS THE BOTTOM OF THE AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5. SOIL AND SAFETY ISSUES WILL BE CONSIDERED THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY WITH NO DIRECT PAYMENT. DEPENDING ON SOIL PROPERTIES AND SAFETY FACTORS. ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL BEYOND THE LIMITS SHOWN IN THE PLAN FOR TEMPORARY AND INTERMEDIATE EXCAVATION LIMITS AND SLOPES ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE CONTRACTOR DURING CONSTRUCTION, EXCAVATION LIMIT LINES AS SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTIONS AND DETAILS IN THIS PLAN ARE FOR THE COMPUTATION OF PAY QUANTITIES. BITUMINOUS AND AGGREGATE COMPACTION FOR AGGREGATE BASE MUST BE BY THE QUALITY COMPACTION METHOD. INCIDENTAL. PROVIDE A UNIFORM TACK COAT AS DOCUMENTED IN THE MOST RECENT SPEC 2357 - BITUMINOUS TACK COAT REQUIREMENTS, WHICH SHALL BE TOPSOIL STRIPPING WILL BE PAID FOR AS EXCAVATION-COMMON (INCIDENTAL). AND/OR AFTER LOOSENING THE SOIL PRIOR TO SEEDING OR BOTH. THIS IS INTENDED TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO MOWING EQUIPMENT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL STICKS AND ROCKS EXCEEDING 3" IN ANY DIMENSION AT THE TIME OF FINAL SLOPE DRESSING PLACEMENT CONSTRUCTION FOR PLACEMENT AS SLOPE DRESSING ON CONSTRUCTION SLOPES. THIS MATERIAL MUST BE USABLE AS 4" SLOPE DRESSING. STRIP AND STOCKPILE THE EXISTING TOPSOIL FROM ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY ANY REFERENCE TO TOPSOIL IN THE PLAN OR SPECIAL PROVISIONS WILL PERTAIN TO THE UPPER 4" (AVERAGE) OF NATURAL (INPLACE) SOIL. RESTORED AS INDICATED ABOVE, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT OR OPERATIONS THAT WERE NOT NECESSARY FOR THE PLANNED CONSTRUCTION MUST BE BE COMPLETED WITHIN THE TIME FRAME INDICATED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WILL REQUIRE TURF ESTABLISHMENT. PERMANENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT (FINAL STABILIZATION) MUST UTILITIES FACILITIES IN THE AREA. THE CONTACT MUST BE MADE THROUGH GOPHER STATE-ONE-CALL. THE CONTRACTOR IS HEARBY REMINDED OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER STATE LAW TO CONTACT ALL UTILITIES THAT MAY HAVE THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THE PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THE FOLLOWING STANDARD PLANS, APPROVED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, SHALL APPLY ON THIS PROJECT STANDARD PLANS INDEX NO.SUBJECT APPROVED REVISED 5-297.115 (1 of 2)STAKING INFORMATION SHEET 08-06-2014 5-297.115 (2 of 2)STAKING INFORMATION SHEET 08-06-2014 5-297.301 (1 of 3)STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS 12-11-2015 02-14-2019 5-297.301 (2 of 3)STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS 12-11-2015 5-297.301 (3 of 3)STANDARD PLANTING DETAILS 12-11-2015 5-297.404 (1 of 3)PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL - ALONG ROADWAYS, DITCHES, AND FLUMES 02-28-2017 5-297.404 (3 of 3)PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL - REPP (BLANKET) STAPLE PATTERN FOR SLOPES 01-08-2020 5-297.405 (1 of 8)TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL - SILT CURTAIN OR SILT FENCE TYPE TB 02-28-2017 5-297.405 (2 of 8)TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL - FILTER BERMS, SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS, AND BALE BARRIERS 01-08-2020 5-297.405 (4 of 8)TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL - STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION 02-28-2017 5-297.405 (5 of 8)TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL - CONSTRUCTION EXITS 02-28-2017 5-297.405 (6 of 8)TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL - SILT FENCE 02-28-2017 5-297.405 (8 of 8)TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CONTROL - CULVERT END CONTROLS 02-28-2017 5-297.442 STANDARD STORM SEWER BEDDING FOR RIGID AND FLEXIBLE PIPE 11-15-2024 5-297.640 (1 of 2)MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL GENERAL NOTES 03-29-2023 5-297.640 (2 of 2)MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND VEGETATION NOTES 03-29-2023 5-297.645 (1 of 2)MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL DETAILS 03-29-2023 5-297.645 (2 of 2)MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL DETAILS 03-29-2023 DISPOSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC. 2104.(INCIDENTAL). THE ENGINEER. HARDENED CONCRETE WASTE MUST BE REMOVED FROM THE PROJECT LIMITS AND PROPERLY CONCRETE TRUCKS THAT WASH OUT WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS MUST DO SO AT A LOCATION APPROVED BY MUST BE DISPOSED OF BY THE CONTRACTOR OFF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC. 2104. ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION THAT ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR SALVAGE OR FOR ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS OR ANY OTHER MATERIAL WHICH MAY BE SEE MN/DOT'S SPECIFICATION 2106. EXISTING AGGREGATE AND TOPSOIL SHOULD BE SALVAGED AND REUSED IN NEW CONSTRUCTION WHERE POSSIBLE. ENCOUNTERED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF DEBRIS, ORGANIC MATERIAL, AND OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL. SUITABLE GRADING MATERIAL (COMMON EMBANKMENT) ON THIS PROJECT SHALL CONSIST OF ALL SOILS AND BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE RIGHT OF WAY. NO DIRECT COMPENSATION WILL BE MADE THEREFORE. MATERIALS NOT TO BE USED IN THE PAVEMENT EMBANKMENTS SHALL BECOME PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC 2104 & 2106. MATERIALS SUCH AS PEAT, MARL, MULCH AND OTHER UNSTABLE BE REMOVED FROM THE EMBANKMENT FOUNDATION. THE UNSUITABLE MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN BACKFILL OR EMBANKMENT. MATERIALS DEFINED AS UNSUITABLE (TOPSOIL, ORGANIC MATERIAL, DEBRIS) MUST THE DEFINED CATEGORIES IN SPEC 2106. THESE SOILS ARE THEREFORE NOT REUSABLE AS STRUCTURAL UNSUITABLE SOILS ARE DEFINED AS SOILS WHICH DO NOT MEET OR ARE NOT MANUFACTURED TO MEET ANY OF SPECIFICATION 2106. MATERIAL IS DESIGNATED SUITABLE WITH RESPECT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT. SEE MN/DOT'S EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHOULD BE USED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, SO FAR AS THE EXCAVATED HAVE BEEN FINISHED TO GRADE IN ANY SIGNIFICANT AREA. PRACTICAL TIME. TOPSOIL COVERING SHALL BE COMPLETED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AFTER THE GRADING SOILS OPERATIONS SO FAR AS TO PERMIT COMPLETION OF THE EROSION CONTROL ITEMS AT THE EARLIEST EARTHWORK FINISHING AND TOPSOIL COVERING OPERATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED CONCURRENTLY WITH GRADING DISPOSED OF OFF THE R/W IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC 2104. ALL MATERIAL NOT UTILIZED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND PERPETUATE DRAINAGE ON ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION (INCIDENTAL). THE FOLLOWING STANDARD PLATES, APPROVED BY THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, SHALL APPLY ON THIS PROJECT STANDARD PLATES PLATE NO.DESCRIPTION 3007F SHEAR REINFORCEMENT FOR PRECAST DRAINAGE STRUCTURES 4003B 30" PRECAST CATCH BASIN - DESIGN N 4010I CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS 4020J MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN (FOR USE WITH OR WITHOUT TRAFFIC LOADS) (2 SHEETS) 4101D RING CASTING FOR MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN 4140D SPECIAL GRATE CASTINGS FOR CATCH BASIN (CONVEX AND CONCAVE) - CASTING NO. 720 AND 721 4180J MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN STEP F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : sc n 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 2 5 s c n . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH AND STANDARD PLATES CONSTRUCTION NOTES, STANDARD PLANS 1 1 4 BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ARE THE MINIMUM. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : T Y P [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 4 5 t y p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 0.04 1:3 C L 2'2'10' 1:3 1' EXISTING GROUND GROUND TIE-IN PROPOSED 4" TOPSOIL RETAINING WALL 4" TOPSOIL VAR. CL 10' GROUND EXISTING VA R. VAR. EXISTING TRAIL TYPICAL SECTION PROPOSED TRAIL TYPICAL SECTION MRG TRAIL STA. 119+33.03 TO STA. 122+04.87 1:3 CL 0.04 2'2'10' 1:31:3 1:3 EXISTING GROUND 4" TOPSOIL PROPOSED GROUND TIE-IN 4" TOPSOIL 0.04 PROPOSED TRAIL TYPICAL SECTION OVERLOOK TRAIL STA. 0+00.00 TO STA. 1+80.35 MRG TRAIL STA. 122+04.87 TO STA. 124+59.60 MRG TRAIL STA. 109+29.45 TO STA. 119+33.03 INSET AREMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT THICKNESS, 2.5" AVERAGE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT INSET A INSET A 2.0" SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (SPWEA240B) 2.0" SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (SPWEA240B) 6.0" AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 1. ALL SLOPES ARE 'FT/FT' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. GENERAL NOTES: IS 2.5" AVERAGE THICKNESS FOR STA. 100+12.25 TO STA. 109+29.45 EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT STA. 119+34.44 TO STA. 120+96.96 EXISTING RETAINING WALL MRG TRAIL DETAILS SEE RETAINING WALL SHEETS FOR RETAINING WALL PLAN AND CROSS SECTIONS FOR DETAILS. CROSS SLOPES DIRECTION VARY. SEE CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1 10.015 0.015 VAR. CL 10' GROUND EXISTING V AR. VAR. EXISTING TRAIL TYPICAL SECTION JAYCEE PARK TRAIL STA. 200+47.16 TO STA. 227+02.53 MRG TRAIL STA. 124+59.60 TO STA. 147+19.66 MRG TRAIL STA. 100+12.25 TO STA. 109+29.45 MILL BITUMINOUS SURFACE (3.0") THICKNESS, 3.0" AVERAGE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 1.5" SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (SPWEA240B) 1.5" SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,B) (SPWEA240B) 2 2 1' 1'1' (PAID FOR AS EXCAVATION-COMMON) THICKNESS, 2.25" AVERAGE REMOVE AGGREGATE BASE RETAINING WALL EXISTING3 3 0.04 1:6 16' - 32' 4 OVERLOOK TRAIL STA. 0+00.00 TO STA. 1+80.35 MRG TRAIL STA. 109+29.45 TO STA. 124+59.60 5 TYPICAL SECTIONS 1 1 L1 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 C1 C2 C3 C4 L8 C5 C6 L9 L10 L11 L12 L2 L10 1 1 0 1 1 5 1 2 0 125 ALIGNMENT TABULATION ELEMENT ID START STATION END STATION DELTA RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH BEARING START NORTHING START EASTING END NORTHING END EASTING Trail L1 108+67.87 109+29.45 61.58 N2�°12'07"W 202959.0060 613756.8250 203020.5350 613754.4590 L2 109+29.45 109+64.79 35.34 N0�°48'29"E 203020.5350 613754.4590 203055.8670 613754.9570 L3 109+64.79 110+07.99 43.20 N1�°06'04"W 203055.8670 613754.9570 203099.0570 613754.1270 L4 110+07.99 111+55.43 147.45 N2�°20'49"W 203099.0570 613754.1270 203246.3790 613748.0890 C1 111+55.43 112+55.14 71�°24'50"80.00 57.50 99.71 203246.3790 613748.0890 203319.9110 613690.5290 L5 112+55.14 113+98.61 143.46 N73�°45'36"W 203319.9110 613690.5290 203360.0310 613552.7890 C2 113+98.61 115+56.00 90�°10'41"100.00 100.31 157.39 203360.0310 613552.7890 203484.3040 613484.8320 L6 115+56.00 115+96.63 40.64 N16�°25'01"E 203484.3040 613484.8320 203523.2860 613496.3170 C3 115+96.63 117+30.10 101�°57'29"75.00 92.55 133.46 203523.2860 613496.3170 203568.0780 613603.9030 L7 117+30.10 121+86.28 456.18 S61�°37'26"E 203568.0780 613603.9030 203351.2780 614005.2720 C4 121+86.28 123+31.17 69�°11'02"120.00 82.76 144.90 203351.2780 614005.2720 203366.0320 614140.7260 L8 123+31.17 123+53.84 22.67 N49�°11'31"E 203366.0320 614140.7260 203380.8460 614157.8820 L9 123+53.84 124+66.25 112.41 N49�°58'16"E 203380.8460 614157.8820 203453.1430 614243.9540 L10 124+66.25 126+18.86 152.61 N51�°09'43"E 203453.1430 614243.9540 203548.8460 614362.8230 Overlook L10 0+00.00 0+16.17 16.17 N52�°09'29"E 203243.2690 613748.2170 203253.1880 613760.9860 C5 0+16.17 0+65.74 94�°40'26"30.00 32.55 49.57 203253.1880 613760.9860 203297.1540 613764.6940 L11 0+65.74 0+99.84 34.10 N42�°30'58"W 203297.1540 613764.6940 203322.2850 613741.6520 C6 0+99.84 1+87.92 168�°14'02"30.00 291.15 88.09 203322.2850 613741.6520 203366.9160 613781.2780 L12 1+87.92 2+47.40 59.47 S54�°16'55"E 203366.9160 613781.2780 203332.1960 613829.5650 F i l e : Pl o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : AL I - A L I 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 7 0 a l i . d g n 2/ 2 7 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400NCOURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 100 SCALE IN FEET 6 ALIGNMENT PLANS AND TABULATIONS 1 1 109+29.45STA BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 0+00.00STA BEGIN CONSTRUCTION 2+47.40STA END CONSTRUCTION 124+59.60STA END CONSTRUCTION LEGEND GRUBBING REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LINES REMOVE ASPHALT DISTURBANCE LIMITS TEMPORARY EASEMENT F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : RE M 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 0 r e m . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH S 0 1 1 0 REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB SALVAGE PICNIC TABLE AND REMOVE CONCRETE SLAB SALVAGE PICNIC TABLE AND PROTECT EXISTING RETAINING WALL REMOVE SIGN TYPE C BARBED WIRE FENCE PROTECT EXISTING 4' REMOVE SIGN TYPE C CL MRG TRAIL CL OVERLOOK STA. BEGIN RECONSTRUCTION END MILL AND OVERLAY REMOVE GATE SALVAGE BENCH M A T C H L I N E S T A. 1 1 3 + 0 0 REMOVAL PLANS 1 3 7 40 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND GRUBBING REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LINES REMOVE ASPHALT SAWCUT 3" ASPHALT TRAIL DISTURBANCE LIMITS REMOVE PIPE SEWER / PIPE CULVERT F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : RE M 2 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 0 r e m . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 115 REMOVE SIGN TYPE C REMOVE SIGN TYPE C REMOVE SIGN TYPE C SALVAGE BENCH CL MRG TRAIL REMOVE SIGN TYPE C REMOVE MANHOLE MA T C H L I N E S T A. 1 1 3 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 40 SCALE IN FEET 8 REMOVAL PLANS 2 3 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : RE M 3 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 0 r e m . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 120 1 25 PROTECT EXISTING RETAINING WALL REMOVE SIGN TYPE C CL MRG TRAIL REMOVE MANHOLE REMOVE MANHOLE MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 LEGEND GRUBBING REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LINES REMOVE ASPHALT SAWCUT 3" ASPHALT TRAIL EXISTING RETAINING WALL DISTURBANCE LIMITS REMOVE PIPE SEWER / PIPE CULVERT 40 SCALE IN FEET REMOVAL PLANS 3 3 9 124+59.60STA. BEGIN MILL AND OVERLAY END RECONSTRUCTION F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : Co n s t r u c t i o n P l a n s - C P P 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 5 c p p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 0 1 1 0 20'R 5'R 11.5' R 30'R 30' R 80' R STA. 109+29.45 BEGIN RECONSTRUCTION END MILL AND OVERLAY CL MRG TRAIL CL OVERLOOK TRAIL 1 0' 22.7' +80.35 +32.19 TEMPORARY EASEMENT +69.21 +41.72 40 SCALE IN FEET M A T C H L I N E S T A. 1 1 3 + 0 0 LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LINES CONSTRUCT 3" ASPHALT TRAIL DISTURBANCE LIMITS TEMPORARY EASEMENT CONSTRUCT 5' CHAIN FENCE CONSTRUCTION PLANS 1 3 10 LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LINES CONSTRUCT 3" ASPHALT TRAIL DISTURBANCE LIMITS F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : Co n s t r u c t i o n P l a n s - C P P 2 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 5 c p p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 115 100' R 75'R CL MRG TRAIL 40 SCALE IN FEET MA T C H L I N E S T A. 1 1 3 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 CONSTRUCTION PLANS 2 3 11 LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCT 3" ASPHALT TRAIL PROPOSED RETAINING WALL DISTURBANCE LIMITS CONSTRUCT 5' CHAIN FENCE F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : Co n s t r u c t i o n P l a n s - C P P 3 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 5 c p p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 120 1 25 120'R STA. 124+59.60 END RECONSTRUCTION CL MRG TRAIL EXISTING RETAINING WALL +41.72 +51.25 +86.28 40 SCALE IN FEET MA T C H L I NE S T A. 1 1 8 + 5 0 CONSTRUCTION PLANS 3 3 12 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : Tr a i l 1 _ A l t B _ P r o f - C r e s t - 1 - T r a i l 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 9 0 p r o . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 110 115 700 700 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 770 770 780 780 7 58 .95 EL 1 10 +52 .9 5 VP I 75 8 .98 EL 11 0 +0 2 .95 VP C 7 5 7.1 4 EL 1 1 1+0 2 .9 5 V PT -3.61% 28K = -0.44'EX = 354.00'SSD = 100.00'LVC = OF FINISHED GRADE PROFILE GRADE - TOP GROUND EXISTING 7 3 5 . 3 9 E L 11 7 + 0 5 . 4 2 V P I 7 5 9 . 0 2 E L 1 0 9 + 2 9 . 4 5 V P I 7 3 9 . 0 0 E L 11 6 + 0 5 . 4 2 V P C 7 3 0 . 3 9 E L 1 1 8 + 0 5 . 4 2 V P T -3.61% -5.00% -3.61% -0.06% -5.00% 144K = -0.35'EX = 876.46'SSD = 200.00'LVC = 120 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 70 0 . 6 5 E L 12 4 + 5 9 . 5 6 V P I 670 680 690 700 710 720 730 740 750 125 +0.13% GROUND EXISTING OF FINISHED GRADE PROFILE GRADE - TOP STA 124+59.60 END RECONSTRUCTION 19K = 0.64'EX = 100.00'LVC = 7 0 0 . 5 7 E L 1 2 4 + 0 1 . 7 9 V P I 7 0 0 . 6 4 E L 12 4 + 4 9 . 2 0 VL P 7 0 3 . 0 7 E L 1 2 3 + 5 1 . 7 9 VP C 7 0 0 . 6 4 E L 1 2 4 + 5 1 . 7 9 V P T -5.00% -5.00% 21 CONSTRUCTION PROFILES 13 STATIONS 109+29.49 TO 119+00.00 MRG TRAIL PROFILE STATIONS 119+00.00 TO 124+59.60 MRG TRAIL PROFILE C STA. 111+52.52 L OVERLOOK TRAIL F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : CT - R O A D - A L G N 3 - O v e r l o o k 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 9 0 p r o . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 0 5 740 740 750 750 760 760 770 770 780 780 7 5 5 . 9 6 E L 0 + 4 3 . 4 9 V P I 7 6 1 . 1 9 E L 1 + 9 8 . 4 0 V P I 7 5 5 . 3 4 E L 0+ 0 0 . 0 0 V P I 76 1 . 6 3 E L 2 + 4 7 . 4 0 V P I 76 0 . 5 2 E L 1 + 7 8 . 4 0 V P C 7 6 1 . 3 7 E L 2 + 1 8 . 4 0 V P T 7 5 5 . 7 5 E L 0+ 2 8 . 4 9 V P C 7 5 6 . 4 7 E L 0+ 5 8 . 4 9 V P T +1.44%+3.38% +0.90% 16K = -0.12'EX = 455.24'SSD = 40.00'LVC = 15K = 0.07'EX = 30.00'LVC = CL STA 0+00.00 BEGIN RECONSTRUCTION GROUND EXISTING STA 2+47.40 END RECONSTRUCTION OF FINISHED GRADE PROFILE GRADE - TOP CONSTRUCTION PROFILES 2 2 14 STATIONS 0+00.00 TO 2+47.40 OVERLOOK TRAIL PROFILE F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : RE T W A L L [ S H E E T ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 2 1 5 w r p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF BAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH DAKOTA COUNTY 200 202201 120 EXISTING RETAINING WALL MRG TRAIL{ {RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS DISTURBANCE LIMITS 20 SCALE IN FEET 200 710 710 720 720 730 730 7 2 0 . 0 0 E L 2 0 0 + 0 0 . 0 0 V P I 7 0 6 . 3 5 E L 2 0 2 + 7 3 . 0 0 V P I -5.00% 7 2 9 . 3 3 E L 2 0 0 + 0 0 . 0 0 V P I 72 8 . 6 7 E L 20 0 + 1 3 . 5 0 V P I 7 2 8 . 6 7 E L 2 0 0 + 1 3 . 5 0 V P I 72 8 . 0 0 E L 20 0 + 2 7 . 0 0 V P I 72 7 . 3 8 E L 2 0 0 + 3 9 . 0 0 V P I 7 2 6 . 7 2 E L 2 0 0 + 6 6 . 0 0 V P I 7 2 6 . 7 2 EL 20 0 + 7 8 . 0 0 V P I 7 2 6 . 1 0 E L 2 0 0 + 7 8 . 0 0 V P I 72 5 . 4 3 E L 20 0 + 9 0 . 0 0 V P I 7 2 5 . 4 3 E L 2 0 1 + 0 3 . 5 0 V P I 7 2 4 . 1 0 E L 20 1 + 0 3 . 5 0 V P I 72 3 . 4 8 E L 2 0 1 + 1 7 . 0 0 V P I 7 2 2 . 8 2 E L 2 0 1 + 2 9 . 0 0 V P I 7 2 2 . 1 5 E L 2 0 1 + 4 2 . 5 0 V P I 7 2 2 . 1 5 E L 2 0 1 + 5 6 . 0 0 V P I 7 2 1 . 5 3 E L 2 0 1 + 5 6 . 0 0 V P I RETAINING WALL STA. 200+00.00 WALL RETAINING BEGIN STA 200+73.00 WALL END RETAINING EXISTING GROUND AT FRONT FACE OF WALL FINISHED GRADE MIN EL. 710.35 STA 202+73.00 MIN EL. 706.35 STA 202+73.00 RETAINING WALL MINIMUM TOP OF TOP OF WALL PROFILE LEVELING PAD OF RETAINING WALL 4' BURY TO BOTTOM MIN EL. 720.00 STA. 200+00.00 MAX EL. 720.00 STA. 200+00.00 72 0 . 2 0 E L 20 1 + 8 0 . 0 0 V P I 72 0 . 2 0 E L 20 1 + 9 5 . 0 0 V P I 71 9 . 5 8 E L 20 1 + 9 5 . 0 0 V P I 7 1 8 . 2 5 EL 20 2 + 0 7 . 0 0 V P I 7 1 7 . 5 8 E L 2 0 2 + 2 0 . 5 0 V P I 7 1 6 . 9 7 E L 2 0 2 + 3 4 . 0 0 V P I 7 1 5 . 6 3 E L 2 0 2 + 4 7 . 5 0 V P I 7 1 4 . 9 7 E L 2 0 2 + 6 1 . 0 0 V P I 7 1 4 . 9 7 E L 2 0 2 + 6 1 . 0 0 V P I 7 1 4 . 9 7 E L 2 0 2 + 7 3 . 0 0 V P I 15 RETAINING WALL PLAN AND PROFILE 1 1 ALIGNMENT TABULATION ELEMENT POINT NUMBER POINT TYPE STATION CIRCULAR CURVE DATA COORDINATES DIRECTION AZIMUTH DELTA DEGREE RADIUS TANGENT LENGTH SPIRAL CURVE DATA EASTING (X)NORTHING (Y) THETA DEGREE ST LT LS ALIGNMENT: MRG TRAIL RETAINING WALL TANGENT START START 200+00.00 613781.51 203469.87 TANGENT PC PC 202+53.24 614004.32 203349.52 S61�°37'27.58"E ARC PC PC 202+53.24 614004.32 203349.52 S61�°37'27.58"E ARC HPI HPI 202+62.71 08�°52'29.54" LT 46�°57'49.51"122 9.47 18.9 614012.65 203345.02 PI ARC CC CC 614062.3 203456.86 ARC PT PT 202+72.14 614021.58 203341.86 S70�°29'57.11"E INCIDENTAL TO THE RETAINING WALL CONSTRUCTION. DRAINAGE SYSTEM, BACKFILL, AND EXCAVATION SHALL BE CONSIDERED BLOCK, CAP LEVELING PAD, COARSE AGGREGATE, GEOTEXTILE, 2. ALL RETAINING WALL MATERIALS INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO 1. SLOPE SWALE BEHIND WALLS TO END OF WALL. GENERAL NOTES: WITH A MINIMUM STEP TRANSITION OVERLAP OF 24 INCHES. LEVELING PAD SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED HORIZONTAL AND LEVEL BOTTOM OF LEVELING PAD SHALL BE BURIED BELOW LINE SHOWN. BLOCK SHALL BE BURIED A MINIMUM OF 2 FEET. REFERENCE NOTES: 1 2 1 2 STA 202+73.00 END RETAINING WALL200+00.00STA BEGIN RETAINING WALL CL MRG TRAIL 5000 5001 5002 EXISTING STORM SEWER CONNECT TO LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PIPE SEWER/CULVERT MANHOLE XXXX STRUCTURE NUMBER SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION CATCH BASIN DISTURBANCE LIMITS 40 SCALE IN FEET F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : DR 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 0 0 h y d . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025 120 CL MRG TRAIL5004 5003 5005 6000 RING CASTING ADJUST FRAME AND EXISTING STORM SEWER CONNECT TO 40 SCALE IN FEET 1 2 16 PROFILES DRAINAGE PLANS AND CONNER J DUNTEMAN 60006 CJD SHEET 2 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED GROUND 12" 1.4% 35.3' 12" 0.3% 38.5' 12" 4.1% 300.3' 12" 5.4% 252.0' 700 700 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED GROUND 12" 5.4% 252.0' F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : DR 2 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 0 0 h y d . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 GROUND EXISTING GROUND PROPOSED 12" 29.2% 30.1' 12" 2.0% 14.9' STRUCTURE EXISTING CONNECT TO 17 2 2 PROFILES DRAINAGE PLANS AND CONNER J DUNTEMAN 60006 CJD INV : 733.00 735.78T.C. 5000 INV (N) : 732.52 INV (S) : 732.52 735.78T.C. 5001 INV (E) : 732.40 INV (S) : 732.40 EX INV (NW) : 739.80 743.67T.C. 5002 INV (E) : 720.20 INV (S) : 720.20 INV (W) : 720.20 724.35T.C. 5004 EX INV (E) : 706.80 INV (W) : 706.80 711.77T.C. 5005 INV : 728.40 732.43T.C. 6000 INV (N) : 720.50 INV (S) : 720.50 724.51T.C. 5003 724.35T.C. 5004 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : SW P - S W P 0 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 0 s w p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH STA. OR R.P. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION RECEIVING WATER SPECIAL WATER INVASIVETMDLTROUT AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY (AES) AND INFESTED WATERS PROJECT CONTACTS ORGANIZATION PHONECONTACT NAME ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 651-649-5451 OR 800-422-0798 MPCA DUTY OFFICER 24 HOUR EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION: AREA DISTURBEDTOTAL AREA SURFACE IMPERVIOUS EXISTINGTOTAL AREA SURFACE IMPERVIOUS PROPOSEDTOTAL AREA SURFACE IMPERVIOUS IN CHANGE NET PROPOSEDTOTAL LAND FEATURE CHANGES IMPAIRED WATER RECEIVING WATERS (A)CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENT, (B) NON-CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENT. OUTLINED IN APPENDIX A OF THE NPDES PERMIT. RELATED OR (B) NON-CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENTS. CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENTS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL BMPS AS RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE. THE IMPAIRED WATERS (LISTED IN TABLE ABOVE) ARE IMPAIRED FOR (A) CONSTRUCTION THE RECEIVING WATERS LISTED IN THE TABLE ABOVE ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE (AERIAL RADIUS) OF THE PROJECT LIMITS AND 3.89 ACRES 1.85 ACRES 1.76 ACRES 651-480-2369 SOIL TYPES TYPICALLY FOUND ON THIS PROJECT ARE SILTY SANDS AND CLAYEY SANDS. JOHN CAVENCITY OF HASTINGS DAKOTA COUNTY 651-554-6538MIKE ADAMS NEAR THE PROJECT BOUNDARY. IN ADDITION TO THE LIST OF SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE AWARE THAT THERE ARE WETLANDS WITHIN AND -0.09 ACRES RECRATIONAL FUNCTION OF THE MINNESOTA RIVER GREENWAY TRAIL. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, TURF ESTABLISHMENT AND PLANTING ACTIVITIES, RELOCATION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER, AND SUPPORTING THE CLEARING TREES AND FENCE FOR FUTURE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS, RECONSTRUCTING AND REALIGNING THE EXISTING TRAIL, SLOPE EXCAVATION, PROVIDING THE PLANNED SCOPE OF THE PROJECT INCLUDES: AND EAGLE BLUFF DRIVE IN THE NORTHWESTERN CORNER OF HASTINGS, MN. THE MINNESOTA RIVER GREENWAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IS LOCATED DIRECTLY BETWEEN THE U.S. LOCK AND DAM 2 ON THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER TERMINATION HAS BEEN FILED. MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE NOTICE OF THE PROJECT ENGINEER AND CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN A WELL HEAD PROTECTION AREA. AGENCY REVIEW. ALL MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED IN THIS PLAN SET OR THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. THERE ARE NO STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR SOIL TYPES MISSISSIPPI RIVER (A) (B)AQC, AQL, AQR & MORE MULTIPLE ALLOWED TO COMMENCE UNTIL PROOF OF CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER. SPECIFICATION SECTION 2573.3.A.2. PROVIDE PROOF OF CERTIFICATION AT THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. WORK WILL NOT BE PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE CERTIFIED INSTALLER FOR EACH CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR THAT INSTALLS THE PRODUCTS LISTED IN UNTIL PROOF OF CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER. FILED WITH THE MPCA. PROVIDE PROOF OF CERTIFICATION AT THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. WORK WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMMENCE PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN ENGINEER TO OVERSEE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. THE EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR WILL WORK WITH THE PROJECT PROVIDE A CERTIFIED EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR IN GOOD STANDING WHO IS KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EXPIRATION OF SWPPP 2025 HR GREEN, INC BRIDGET OSBORN TRAINING: THIS SWPPP WAS PREPARED BY PERSONNEL THAT ARE CERTIFIED IN THE DESIGN OF CONSTRUCTION SWPPPS. INDIVIDUALS WITH SWPPP ENTIRE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION, AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE SITE TO ENSURE THAT THE SWPPP WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AND STAY IN EFFECT UNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IS COMPLETE, THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR WILL DEVELOP A CHAIN OF COMMAND WITH ALL OPERATORS ON PERMIT. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AT ALL TIMES UNTIL THE DAKOTA COUNTY AND THE CONTRACTOR ARE CO-PERMITEES FOR THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) CONSTRUCTION CHAIN OF RESPONSIBILITY DAKOTA COUNTY STAFF ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER SYSTEM. LONG TERM MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION PROJECT PERSONNEL AND TRAINING DESCRIPTION LOCATION MEASURES CONTROL EROSIONTEMPORARY MEASURES CONTROL EROSIONPERMANENT FLOW OFDIRECTION STABILIZATIONFINAL NOTES CONSTRUCTION ANDSOILS STRUCTURESDRAINAGE TABULATIONDRAINAGE SHEETS PROFILE SEWERSTORM TABULATION SEWERSTORM DETAILS CONTROL SEDIMENT ANDEROSION TABULATION CONTROLEROSION TABULATION ESTABLISHMENTTURF MAPSITE SITE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PROJECT PLAN SHEETS NO. SHEETS NO. SHEETS NO. SHEETS NO. SHEETS NO. SHEETS NO. SHEET NO. SHEET NO. 1 21 -23 SHEET NO. BE ADDITIONAL REQUIRED SWPPP ELEMENTS INCLUDED ON THE PROJECT THAT ARE NOT LISTED ON THIS SHEET. INTENDED TO BE A QUICK REFERENCE FOR THE CONTRACTOR AND PROJECT ENGINEER TO USE IN THE FIELD. THERE MAY PROVISIONS, MNDOT SPEC BOOK (2020 EDITION). THE NOTES AND TABLE BELOW ARE THE REQUIRED SWPPP ELEMENTS MAY BE LOCATED IN MANY PLACES WITHIN THE PLAN SET AS WELL AS IN THE SPECIAL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. F. MAINTAIN ALL BMPS UNTIL WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED, SITE HAS GONE UNDER FINAL STABILIZATION, AND MAY HAVE TO OCCUR MORE OFTEN TO MINIMIZE OFF SITE IMPACTS. LIGHTLY WET THE PAVEMENT PRIOR TO SWEEPING. SWEEPING IS REQUIRED 3 TIMES PER WEEK DURING PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PERIODS. STREET SWEEPING E. REMOVE TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM PAVED SURFACES BOTH ON AND OFF SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. STREET WORKING IN SURFACE WATERS. SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WORKING IN SURFACE WATERS. CONTACT ALL APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES PRIOR TO SEDIMENT REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY. PREPARE AND SUBMIT A OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. RESTABILIZE ANY AREAS THAT ARE DISTURBED BY SEDIMENT REMOVAL OPERATIONS. D. REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. COMPLETE WORK WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. C. DRAIN AND REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASINS ONCE THE SEDIMENT HAS REACHED HEIGHT AND/OR DEPTH OF THE DEVICE. B. REPAIR OR REPLACE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 THE DISCOVERY. REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. COMPLETE REPAIRS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY FOLLOWING A. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR SUPPLEMENT PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN IT BECOMES NONFUNCTIONAL OR SEDIMENT DISCOVERY UNLESS LISTED DIFFERENTLY BELOW: REPLACE, REPAIR OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY FOLLOWING F. DOCUMENTS AND CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP E. DATE AND AMOUNT OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCH IN 24 HOURS D. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN, INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES C. FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS B. NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS A. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY: IN A FORMAT THAT IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER. INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING IN THE RECORDS OF EACH RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES IN WRITING WITHIN 24 HOURS. SUBMIT INSPECTION REPORTS ENSURE THAT EQUIPMENT IS NOT BEING DRIVEN ACROSS THE AREA). SEDIMENT ACCUMULATION. INSPECT INFILTRATION AREAS FOR SIGNS OF SEDIMENT DEPOSITION AND COMPACTION (TO FOR EVIDENCE OF TRACKING ONTO PAVED SURFACES. INSPECT SURROUNDING PROPERTIES FOR EVIDENCE OF OFF SITE DITCHES FOR SIGNS OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE NOT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. INSPECT SURFACE WATER INCLUDING DRAINAGE PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT, EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS UNTIL THE SITE HAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS. INSPECT ALL TEMPORARY AND INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND 21 -23 21 -23 24 -26 24 -26 24 -26 24 -26 24 -26 24 -26SHEETS NO. SHEETS NO. SHEETS NO. SHEETS NO. 18 PREVENTION PLAN STORM WATER POLLUTION 1 1 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : SW P - S W P 0 2 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 0 s w p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE (CONTINUED) GENERAL SWPPP NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY POLLUTION PREVENTION STABILIZATION TIME FRAMES 13. DITCH CHECKS WILL BE PLACED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. TO SHORE AS POSSIBLE. PLACE PERIMETER CONTROL BMP ON LAND IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE IN WATER WORK IS COMPLETED. 12. FLOATING SILT CURTAIN IS ALLOWED AS PERIMETER CONTROL FOR IN WATER WORK ONLY. PLACE THE FLOATING SILT CURTAIN AS CLOSE NOT PLACE STOCKPILES IN NATURAL BUFFER AREAS, SURFACE WATERS OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCES. 11. PROVIDE PERIMETER CONTROL AROUND ALL STOCKPILES. PLACE BMP A MINIMUM 5 FEET FROM THE TOE OF SLOPE WHERE FEASIBLE. DO SOILS AND PRIOR TO DISCHARGING TO SURFACE WATERS. PLACE J-HOOKS AT A MAXIMUM OF 100 FOOT INTERVALS. 10. LOCATE PERIMETER CONTROL ON THE CONTOUR TO CAPTURE OVERLAND, LOW- VELOCITY SHEET FLOWS DOWN GRADIENT OF ALL EXPOSED IS STABILIZED. GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. MAINTAIN SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES UNTIL CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE 9. ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS AND UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES BEFORE ANY UP REMOVAL WORK AND/OR GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES COMMENCE. SURFACES AND TO CAPTURE SEDIMENT ON SITE. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY 8. THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE PLACED AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE EROSION FROM DISTURBED PREVENT EROSION. 7. DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS WHENEVER FEASIBLE. PROVIDE VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICES AS NEEDED TO DISSIPATION DEVICES AS NEEDED TO KEEP CHANNELS FROM ERODING AND TO PREVENT NUISANCE CONDITIONS AT THE OUTLET. 6. ROUTE STORMWATER AROUND UNSTABILIZED AREAS OF THE SITE WHENEVER FEASIBLE. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL AND VELOCITY PERMISSION FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. PRESERVE ALL NATURAL BUFFERS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. IF IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO DISTURB AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OBTAIN WRITTEN 5. DO NOT DISTURB AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED PRIOR TO STARTING GROUND 4. BURNING OF ANY MATERIAL IS NOT ALLOWED WITHIN PROJECT BOUNDARY. ACTIVE SERVICE TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE. 3. IT IS THE DESIGNER'S INTENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR BUILD PONDS AND PLACE EROSION CONTROL BMPS BEFORE PUTTING THEM INTO THERE WILL BE NO EXTRA TIME ADDED TO THE CONTRACT DUE TO THE UNTIMELY SUBMITTAL. WILL NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMMENCE IF A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE HAS BEEN GRANTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE ENGINEER IN WRITING. ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS FOR MNDOT TO REVIEW AND ACCEPT SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUBMITTALS. WORK PLAN AREA", ANY WORK THAT WILL REQUIRE DEWATERING, AND AS REQUESTED BY THE ENGINEER. SUBMIT ALL SITE MANAGEMENT PLANS TO APPLICATION AREAS, WORK IN AND NEAR AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY, AREAS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLANS AS "SITE MANAGEMENT 2. PREPARE AND SUBMIT A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE ENGINEER'S ACCEPTANCE FOR CONCRETE MANAGEMENT, CONCRETE SLURRY SWPPP AND ALL AMENDMENTS ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. 1. AMEND THE SWPPP AND DOCUMENT ANY AND ALL CHANGES TO THE SWPPP AND ASSOCIATED PLAN SHEETS IN A TIMELY MANNER. STORE THE AREA TIME FRAME NOTES 1 7 ONLY APPLIES DURING THE EXCLUSION DATES. 7. SEE WATER RESOURCES NOTES FOR A LIST OF PUBLIC WATER EXCLUSION DATES. TWENTY FOUR HOUR STABILIZATION REQUIREMENT MULCHES, HYDROMULCHES AND BLANKETS. 6. KEEP DITCHES AND EXPOSED SOILS IN AN EVEN ROUGH GRADED CONDITION IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO APPLY EROSION CONTROL C. MULTI YEAR CONSTRUCTION 22-111 B. SINGLE YEAR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN AUGUST 1 AND OCTOBER 31, SEED WITH SEED MIXTURE 21-112 A. SINGLE YEAR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN MAY 1 - AUGUST 1, SEED WITH SEED MIXTURE 21-111 3, OR 4 AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THE SEED MIX USED IN THE RAPID STABILIZATION MAY BE SUBSTITUTED AS FOLLOWS: 5. TOPSOIL BERMS MUST BE STABILIZED IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED PERIMETER CONTROL BMPS. USE RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 2, SEEDED, AND BLANKETED WITHIN THE TIME FRAMES IN THE NPDES PERMIT. 4. STABILIZE ALL AREAS OF THE SITE PRIOR TO THE ONSET OF WINTER. ANY WORK STILL BEING PERFORMED WILL BE SNOW MULCHED, AREAS. 3. APPLICATION OF MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER AND POLYACRYLAMIDE ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE STABILIZATION METHODS IN THESE 2. STABILIZE WETTED PERIMETER OF DITCH (I.E. WHERE THE DITCH GETS WET). STOCKPILED AND CONSTRUCTED ROAD BASE ARE EXEMPT FROM THE STABILIZATION REQUIREMENT. MORE THAN ONCE DURING THE COURSE OF THE PROJECT. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT CLAY OR SILT AND SITE. COMPLETE STABILIZATION WITHIN THE TIME FRAME LISTED. IN MANY INSTANCES THIS WILL REQUIRE STABILIZATION TO OCCUR 1. INITIATE STABILIZATION IMMEDIATELY WHEN CONSTRUCTION HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SWALE OR DITCH DRAINAGE OF FEET LINEAL 200LAST SWALE OR DITCH DRAINAGE OF PORTIONSREMAINING OUTLETS CULVERT ANDPIPE STOCKPILES AND SOILSEXPOSED WATER PUBLIC A OF FEET 200WITHIN HOURS24 HOURS24 EDGEPROPERTY OR WATER SURFACE TO CONNECTION OF HOURS 24WITHIN 3 2,1, 31, WATER. CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF LAND DISTURBANCE AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE 20. PRESERVE A MINIMUM OF 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR (IF BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE) PROVIDE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT 19. REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM STORMWATER SYSTEM AT THE END OF PROJECT. 18. PROVIDE STABILIZATION IN ANY TRENCHES CUT FOR DEWATERING OR SITE DRAINING PURPOSES. 17. PROVIDE SCOUR PROTECTION AT ANY OUTFALL OF DEWATERING ACTIVITIES. SEDIMENT TRAPS TO THE DESIGN CAPACITY AFTER ALL UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. CLEAN OUT ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER BASINS REGARDLESS OF WHETHER USED AS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS OR TEMPORARY TREATED SO THAT IT DOES NOT CAUSE A NUISANCE CONDITION IN THE RECEIVING WATERS OR TO DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS. IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO DISCHARGE THE SEDIMENT LADEN WATER TO A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN, THE WATER MUST BE 16. DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN WATER TO TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS WHENEVER FEASIBLE. IN THE EVENT THAT PROPER CONSTRUCTION EXIT INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE. EXITS WHEN EVIDENCE OF TRACKING IS DISCOVERED. REGULAR STREET SWEEPING IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE TO THE PROJECT SITE. PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION EXITS OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO PREVENT TRACK OUT. MAINTAIN CONSTRUCTION 15. PLACE CONSTRUCTION EXITS, AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PAVED SURFACES BOTH ON AND OFF PROTECTION DEVICES. NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE CURRENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. THERE WILL BE NO COST TO MNDOT FOR REPLACEMENT OF INLET IF THE PROJECT ENGINEER DEEMS AN INLET PROTECTION DEVICE TO BE NONFUNCTIONAL, IN POOR CONDITION, INEFFECTIVE, OR DEVICES IN GOOD FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. REPLACE INLET PROTECTION DEVICE WITH A SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE FOR ONCE PER INLET REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE BMP IS PLACED. KEEP ALL STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION PLACED MULTIPLE TIMES IN THE SAME LOCATION OVER THE LIFE OF THE CONTRACT. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILL BE PAID ONLY ALLOWED FOR SHORT INTERVALS DURING MILLING OR PAVING OPERATIONS. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MAY NEED TO BE INLET GRATE IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE INLET PROTECTION BMP FOR GRADING OPERATIONS. SILT FENCE PLACED IN THE GRATE IS CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WITH EMERGENCY OVERFLOW CAPABILITIES. SILT FENCE PLACED IN THE 14. PROTECT STORM SEWER INLETS AT ALL TIMES WITH THE APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION FOR EACH SPECIFIC PHASE OF 7 DAYS 7 DAYS STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS INCLUDING DITCHES AND CULVERTS. PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT SAW CUT SLURRY AND PLANING WASTE FROM LEAVING MNDOT RIGHT OF WAY AND FROM ENTERING STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING INLETS, DITCHES AND CURB FLOW LINES. USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL CONCRETE WASTES FROM LEAVING RIGHT OF WAY, DEPOSITING IN EXISTING OR FUTURE VEGETATED AREAS, AND FROM ENTERING 11. USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT CONCRETE DUST, PARTICLES, CONCRETE WASH OUT, AND OTHER WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING INLETS, DITCHES AND CURB FLOW LINES. CUTTINGS, MILLINGS, AND OTHER BITUMINOUS WASTES FROM AREAS OF EXISTING OR FUTURE VEGETATED SOILS AND FROM ALL 10. USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT DISCHARGE OR PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS GRINDINGS, WILL BE DISPOSED OF AND THE LOCATION OF THE DISPOSAL SITE. SUBMIT PLAN TO THE ENGINEER. 9. CREATE AND FOLLOW A WRITTEN DISPOSAL PLAN FOR ALL WASTE MATERIALS. INCLUDE IN THE PLAN HOW THE MATERIAL OPERATIONS OR CONTAINMENT AREA. MUST NOT CONTACT THE GROUND. DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO THAT IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS. LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES 8. PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OF CONCRETE, STUCCO, EQUIPMENT WASHING. ENGINE DEGREASING IS NOT ALLOWED ON THE SITE. A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER EFFECTIVE CONTROL. PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL WASTE GENERATED BY VEHICLE AND 7. LIMIT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT WASHING TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA TO PROVIDE A SPILL KIT AT EACH LOCATION THAT VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT ARE FUELED OR MAINTAINED AT. MATERIALS TO PREVENT SPILLS OR LEAKED CHEMICALS FROM DISCHARGING TO SURFACE WATER OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCES. 6. FUEL AND MAINTAIN VEHICLES IN A DESIGNATED CONTAINED AREA WHENEVER FEASIBLE. USE DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENT DISPOSE OF ALL SANITARY WASTE. 5. POSITION ALL PORTABLE TOILETS SO THAT THEY ARE SECURE AND CANNOT BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. PROPERLY 4. STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE OF ALL SOLID WASTE. AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS WITH SECONDARY CONTAINMENT. CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY. GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT, PETROLEUM BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, INFEASIBLE. STORE ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO OIL, DIESEL FUEL, ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE TO THE DESIGNATED STORAGE AREA AT THE END OF THE BUSINESS DAY UNLESS 3. PROVIDE A SECURE STORAGE AREA WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS FOR ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE. RETURN CONTAINMENT. INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICALS, AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER AND WITH SECONDARY 2. STORE ALL BUILDING MATERIALS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS, PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, 1. PROVIDE A SPILL KIT AT EACH WORK LOCATION ON THE SITE. 19 2 3 PREVENTION PLAN STORM WATER POLLUTION F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : SW P - S W P 0 3 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 0 s w p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH WATER RESOURCES NOTES STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE (CONTINUED) TYPE OF PERMITAGENCY WATERBODY EXCLUSION DATES DURING THE EXCLUSION DATES. SEE DNR PERMIT FOR WHICH WATERBODIES THIS APPLIES TO. 6. THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF WATERS HAVE WORK IN WATER EXCLUSIONS. NO WORK IN THE WATER IS ALLOWED (MPCA) AGENCY CONTROL POLLUTIONMINNESOTA PERMIT CONSTRUCTIONNPDES LAKES STREAMSNON-TROUT STREAMSTROUT SEPTEMBER 15 - MAY 15 SEPTEMBER 15 - JUNE 30 LAKE SUPERIOR WATERSHED TROUT STREAMS IN 1 INCLUDES ST. LOUIS, CLOQUET, NEMADJI AND NORTH SHORE WATERSHEDS. 1 APRIL 1 - JUNE 30 APRIL 1 - JUNE 30 TO COMMENCING WORK. PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO THE RECEIVING WATER. SUBMIT A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR DEWATERING ACTIVITIES. ALL TEMPORARY DEWATERING SHALL BE DISCHARGED TO AN APPROVED LOCATION FOR TREATMENT BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THIS PERMIT PRIOR TO COMMENCING POSSIBLE THAT A PERMIT FOR THE TEMPORARY APPROPRIATION OF WATERS OF THE STATE, NON-IRRIGATION FROM MNDNR WILL TEMPORARY DEWATERING ACTIVITIES MAY BE REQUIRED FOR ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITY WORK. THEREFORE IT IS WATER QUALITY VOLUME ON SITE. INDICATES PROJECTS THAT INCREASE IMPERVIOUS SURFACES LESS THAN ONE (1) TOTAL ACRE DO NOT NEED TO RETAIN ANY NO PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. PART III.D. OF THE NPDES PERMIT REVIEW ALL PERMITS FOR ANY SPECIAL CONDITIONS THAT WILL AFFECT CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT. 5. THE FOLLOWING WATER RELATED PERMITS APPLY TO THIS PROJECT: APPROVAL AND SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. EXISTING TILE OR DRAINAGE SYSTEM TO ENSURE THAT EXISTING UPLAND DRAINAGE IS PERPETUATED. THIS SHOULD BE DONE TO THE 4. ANY SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE TILES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR REROUTED, AND CONNECTED TO THE 3. PERFORM POST INSTALLATION MANDREL TESTING OF ALL PLASTIC PIPE. 2. SUBSOIL ALL DISTURBED GREEN SPACES EXCEPT AS LISTED IN 2574.3A.2. RESOURCES DESIGNER. PERMITS. ANY CHANGES TO THE SIZE, ELEVATION OR DIRECTION OF FLOW OF THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM MUST BE APPROVED BY THE METRO WATER SHOWN ON THE PLANS MAY CAUSE PROBLEMS OFF THE PROJECT AND COULD MEAN THE PROJECT IS OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPROVED DRAINAGE CONTROL AGENCY (MPCA) AND WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. CHANGING THESE ITEMS OR THE DIRECTION OF FLOW FROM WHAT IS DITCH BLOCKS AND OVERFLOW DEVICES HAVE BEEN SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED TO CONFORM TO MNDOT DESIGN STANDARDS, MINNESOTA POLLUTION 1. THE SIZE AND ELEVATION OF CULVERTS, STORM SEWER PIPES, CATCH BASINS, PONDS, INFILTRATION/FILTRATION BASINS, PERMEABLE CRITICAL DRAINAGE FEATURES, NATURAL RESOURCES AND CONTRACTOR OPERATIONS THAT MAY IMPACT DRAINAGE AND NATURAL RESOURCES. THESE NOTES ALONG WITH THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE ARE INTENDED TO GIVE INFORMATION ON 20 3 3 PREVENTION PLAN STORM WATER POLLUTION 0 1 1 0 CL MRG TRAIL STA. 109+29.45 BEGIN RECONSTRUCTION END MILL AND OVERLAY CL OVERLOOK 40 SCALE IN FEET M A T C H L I N E S T A. 1 1 3 + 0 0 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : er c - e r c 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 5 e r c . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH SILT FENCE; TYPE HI LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LINES CULVERT END CONTROL TEMPORARY EASEMENT SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION DISTURBANCE LIMITS REPP CAT. 20 REPP CAT. 30 EROSION CONTROL PLANS 1 3 21 CP CP MH 115 CL MRG TRAIL 40 SCALE IN FEET MA T C H L I N E S T A. 1 1 3 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : er c - e r c 2 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 5 e r c . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SILT FENCE; TYPE HI EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LINES CULVERT END CONTROL SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION DISTURBANCE LIMITS REPP CAT. 20 REPP CAT. 30 EROSION CONTROL PLANS 2 3 22 CP MH 120 1 25 CL MRG TRAIL STA. 124+59.60 END RECONSTRUCTION 40 SCALE IN FEET MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : er c - e r c 3 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 5 e r c . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SILT FENCE; TYPE HI EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY CULVERT END CONTROL SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION DISTURBANCE LIMITS REPP CAT. 20 23 EROSION CONTROL PLANS 3 3 CP 0 1 1 0 CL MRG TRAIL STA. 109+29.45 BEGIN RECONSTRUCTION END MILL AND OVERLAY CL OVERLOOK 40 SCALE IN FEET M A T C H L I N E S T A. 1 1 3 + 0 0 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : te p 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 6 t e p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH UPLAND PRAIRIE MIX LEGEND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LINES TEMPORARY EASEMENT DISTURBANCE LIMITS SHADY WOODLAND MIX TREE/SHRUB OAK SAVANNA ALT TREE/SHRUB SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION SEEDING ZONES PLANTING ZONES TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS 1 3 24 CJD BAGS AS DESCRIBED IN SPECIFICATIONS. 9. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT PLANTINGS WITH TREE TUBES AND WATERING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL PLANTING ZONES. 8. TREE AND SHRUB INSTALLATION SPACING IS DETAILED IN THE WHEAT. UTILIZE MNDOT SEED MIX WW AT 100 LBS / AC. 7. ALL SEEDING ZONES ALSO RECEIVE A COVER CROP APPLICATION OF WINTER 6. SHADY WOODLAND MIX TO BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 70.4 LBS / AC. 5. UPLAND PRAIRIE SEED MIX TO BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 74 LBS / AC. SHEETS. RATE OF 65 LB/AC. THIS BUFFER ZONE IS NOT DISPLAYED ON PLAN SEEDED WITH A MNDOT MESIC INSLOPE SEED MIX AT AN APPLICATION 4. ALL AREAS WITHIN 2.5 FEET OF BITUMINOUS TRAIL EDGE WILL BE THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS PRIOR TO NATIVE SEED APPLICATION. 3. ALL INVASIVE AND/OR WEEDY VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 2. DAKOTA COUNTY TO PROVIDE SEED MIX FOR ALL SEEDING ACTIVITIES. EROSION CONTROL, AND PLANTING. 1. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW SPECIFICATINOS FOR SEEDING, PERMANENT GENERAL NOTES: 115 CL MRG TRAIL 40 SCALE IN FEET MA T C H L I N E S T A. 1 1 3 + 0 0 MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : te p 2 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 6 t e p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH LEGEND UPLAND PRAIRIE MIX CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL LINES SHADY WOODLAND MIX TREE/SHRUB OAK SAVANNA ALT TREE/SHRUB SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION SEEDING ZONES PLANTING ZONES DISTURBANCE LIMITS TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS 2 3 25 CJD BAGS AS DESCRIBED IN SPECIFICATIONS. 9. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT PLANTINGS WITH TREE TUBES AND WATERING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL PLANTING ZONES. 8. TREE AND SHRUB INSTALLATION SPACING IS DETAILED IN THE WHEAT. UTILIZE MNDOT SEED MIX WW AT 100 LBS / AC. 7. ALL SEEDING ZONES ALSO RECEIVE A COVER CROP APPLICATION OF WINTER 6. SHADY WOODLAND MIX TO BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 70.4 LBS / AC. 5. UPLAND PRAIRIE SEED MIX TO BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 74 LBS / AC. SHEETS. RATE OF 65 LB/AC. THIS BUFFER ZONE IS NOT DISPLAYED ON PLAN SEEDED WITH A MNDOT MESIC INSLOPE SEED MIX AT AN APPLICATION 4. ALL AREAS WITHIN 2.5 FEET OF BITUMINOUS TRAIL EDGE WILL BE THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS PRIOR TO NATIVE SEED APPLICATION. 3. ALL INVASIVE AND/OR WEEDY VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 2. DAKOTA COUNTY TO PROVIDE SEED MIX FOR ALL SEEDING ACTIVITIES. EROSION CONTROL, AND PLANTING. 1. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW SPECIFICATINOS FOR SEEDING, PERMANENT GENERAL NOTES: 120 1 25 CL MRG TRAIL STA. 124+59.60 END RECONSTRUCTION 40 SCALE IN FEET MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 1 8 + 5 0 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : te p 3 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 6 t e p . d g n 2/ 2 8 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ 6 0 _ p e r c e n t . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYBAJ GGF XXXX-XX KRR 26 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 2/28/2025 2/28/2025JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH LEGEND UPLAND PRAIRIE MIX CONSTRUCTION LIMITS EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY SHADY WOODLAND MIX TREE/SHRUB OAK SAVANNA ALT TREE/SHRUB SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION SEEDING ZONES PLANTING ZONES DISTURBANCE LIMITS 26 TURF ESTABLISHMENT PLANS 3 3 CJD BAGS AS DESCRIBED IN SPECIFICATIONS. 9. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT PLANTINGS WITH TREE TUBES AND WATERING SPECIFICATIONS FOR ALL PLANTING ZONES. 8. TREE AND SHRUB INSTALLATION SPACING IS DETAILED IN THE WHEAT. UTILIZE MNDOT SEED MIX WW AT 100 LBS / AC. 7. ALL SEEDING ZONES ALSO RECEIVE A COVER CROP APPLICATION OF WINTER 6. SHADY WOODLAND MIX TO BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 70.4 LBS / AC. 5. UPLAND PRAIRIE SEED MIX TO BE APPLIED AT A RATE OF 74 LBS / AC. SHEETS. RATE OF 65 LB/AC. THIS BUFFER ZONE IS NOT DISPLAYED ON PLAN SEEDED WITH A MNDOT MESIC INSLOPE SEED MIX AT AN APPLICATION 4. ALL AREAS WITHIN 2.5 FEET OF BITUMINOUS TRAIL EDGE WILL BE THE DISTURBANCE LIMITS PRIOR TO NATIVE SEED APPLICATION. 3. ALL INVASIVE AND/OR WEEDY VEGETATION SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 2. DAKOTA COUNTY TO PROVIDE SEED MIX FOR ALL SEEDING ACTIVITIES. EROSION CONTROL, AND PLANTING. 1. CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW SPECIFICATINOS FOR SEEDING, PERMANENT GENERAL NOTES: STA 109+29.45 50 0 50 750 750 760 760 759.02 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W INP R/W STA 109+50.00 50 0 50 750 750 760 760 -1.5% 759.01 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W INP R/W STA 110+00.00 50 0 50 740 740 750 750 760 760 -1.5% 758.98 TRAIL1_ALTBCLINP R/W INP R/W T.E. STA 110+50.00 50 0 50 740 740 750 750 760 760 -1.5% 758.55 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W INP R/W OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 110+50.00 - 109+29.45 TRAIL1_ALTB 1 22 STA 111+00.00 50 0 50 740 740 750 750 760 760 -1.5%1:3 757.24 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W STA 111+50.00 50 0 50 740 740 750 750 760 760 -1.5% 755.44 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W 1:3 1:3 STA 112+00.00 50 0 50 740 740 750 750 760 760 -1.5% 1:3.1 8.9%1.0%753.64 TRAIL1_ALTB 757.04 SCENIC OVERLOOK CL CL INP R/W 1:2.5 1:3 OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 112+00.00 - 111+00.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 2 22 STA 112+26.25 0 50 100 740 740 750 750 760 760 1:2.6 -1.0% 1:3.3 3.1% 752.69 TRAIL1_ALTB 758.44 SCENIC OVERLOOK 759.88 SCENIC OVERLOOK CL CL CL 760.45T.C. EXCB-02 1.0% 118.3' 12" STA 112+50.00 50 0 50 740 740 750 750 760 760 1:4 -1.5% 1:3 751.83 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 748.50 STA 113+00.00 50 0 50 740 740 750 750 760 760 1:2.5 -1.5% 1:3 750.03 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 113+00.00 - 112+26.25 TRAIL1_ALTB 3 22 STA 113+50.00 50 0 50 740 740 750 750 760 760 1:2.5 -0.7% 1:3 748.22 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W STA 114+00.00 50 0 50 740 740 750 750 760 760 1:2.5 1.5% 1:3 746.42 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W STA 114+50.00 50 0 50 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 1:2.5 1.5% 1:3 744.61 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 114+50.00 - 113+50.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 4 22 STA 115+00.00 50 0 50 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 1:2.5 1.5% 1:3 742.81 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W STA 115+50.00 50 0 50 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 1:2.3 1.5% 1:3 741.00 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 115+50.00 - 115+00.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 5 22 STA 116+00.00 50 0 50 730 730 740 740 750 750 1:3 1.5% 1:3739.20 TRAIL1_ALTBCL STA 116+42.83 50 0 730 730 740 7401:3 1:4 0.0% 1:4 1:3 -0.0% 737.60 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 735.67 735.67 735.78T.C. 5001 735.78T.C. 5000 1.4% 35.3' 12" STA 116+50.00 50 0 50 730 730 740 7401:3 1:8 1:3.6 1.5%1:6.7 1:7.1 1:3737.32 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 735.82 736.17 739.32T.C. EXCB-00 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 116+50.00 - 116+00.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 6 22 STA 117+00.00 50 0 50 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 1:2.7 1.5% 1:3735.28 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 117+00.00 - 117+00.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 7 22 STA 117+50.00 50 0 50 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 1:3 0.4% 1:3733.06 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" 12" STA 118+00.00 50 0 50 730 730 740 740 750 750 1:3 -1.5% 1:3 730.66 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 118+00.00 - 117+50.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 8 22 STA 118+50.00 50 0 50 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 1:3 -1.5% 1:3 728.16 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" 12" STA 119+00.00 50 0 50 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 1:3 -1.5% 1:3 725.66 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W 12" 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 119+00.00 - 118+50.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 9 22 Hard-surface trail over BIZ exceeding 30% 32.4 % slope STA 119+22.58 0 50 700 700 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 1:3 -1.4% 1:3724.53 TRAIL1_ALTBCL INP R/W 2.0% 14.9' 12" 29.2% 30.1' 12" 16.2% 29.9' 12" 732.43T.C. 6000 724.35T.C. 5004 724.51T.C. 5003 733.22T.C. EXMH-00 OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 119+22.58 - 119+22.58 TRAIL1_ALTB 10 22 31.5% Slope STA 119+50.00 50 0 50 700 700 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 1:10.1 -1.5% 1:6 723.16 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 119+50.00 - 119+50.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 11 22 34.3% Slope STA 120+00.00 50 0 50 700 700 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 -1.5% 1:6720.66 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 120+00.00 - 120+00.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 12 22 42.1 % slope STA 120+50.00 50 0 50 700 700 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 1:10 -1.5% 1:6 718.16 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 120+50.00 - 120+50.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 13 22 34.3% slope STA 121+00.00 50 0 50 690 690 700 700 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 1:10 -1.5% 1:6715.66 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 121+00.00 - 121+00.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 14 22 33.4% slope STA 121+50.00 50 0 50 690 690 700 700 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 750 750 1:10 -1.5% 1:6713.16 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 121+50.00 - 121+50.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 15 22 33.0% Slope STA 122+00.00 50 0 50 690 690 700 700 710 710 720 720 730 730 740 740 1:10 -1.5% 1:6 710.66 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 122+00.00 - 122+00.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 16 22 STA 122+50.00 50 0 50 690 690 700 700 710 710 720 720 1:10 -1.5% 1:3 708.16 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" STA 123+00.00 50 0 50 690 690 700 700 710 710 1:10 -1.5% 705.66 TRAIL1_ALTBCL 12" OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 123+00.00 - 122+50.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 17 22 STA 123+50.00 50 0 50 690 690 700 700 710 710 1:4 -1.5% 703.16 TRAIL1_ALTBCL STA 124+00.00 50 0 50 690 690 700 700 710 710 -1.5% 701.26 TRAIL1_ALTBCL OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 124+00.00 - 123+50.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 18 22 STA 124+50.00 50 0 50 680 680 690 690 700 700 710 710 1:10 -1.5% 700.64 TRAIL1_ALTBCL STA 124+59.56 50 0 50 680 680 690 690 700 700 710 710 1:10 -1.5% 700.65 TRAIL1_ALTBCL OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL 124+59.56 - 124+50.00 TRAIL1_ALTB 19 22 OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL STA 0+00.00 50 0 50 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 1:5.4 6.8%-5.4%-4.1% 1:4.5755.36 TRAIL1_ALTB 755.34 SCENIC OVERLOOKCLCL INP R/W STA 0+50.00 50 0 50 740 740 750 750 760 760 -7.5%-1.5% -2.3% 1:3 754.12 TRAIL1_ALTB 756.20 SCENIC OVERLOOK CL CL INP R/W 0+50.00 - 0+00.00 SCENIC OVERLOOK 20 22 OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL STA 1+00.00 50 0 50 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 770 770 1:3 -1.5% -2.0% 1:3 752.89 TRAIL1_ALTB 757.87 SCENIC OVERLOOK CL CL INP R/W 12" STA 1+50.00 50 0 50 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 770 770 1:3 -1.5% 1:3 759.56 SCENIC OVERLOOKCL INP R/W 12" 1+50.00 - 1+00.00 SCENIC OVERLOOK 21 22 OF SHEETSDAKOTA COUNTY SHEET NO. $F I L E $ $D A T E $ $T I M E $ MRG TRAIL STA 2+00.00 50 0 50 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 770 770 -1.5% 761.10 SCENIC OVERLOOKCL INP R/W STA 2+47.40 50 0 50 730 730 740 740 750 750 760 760 761.63 SCENIC OVERLOOKCL 2+47.40 - 2+00.00 SCENIC OVERLOOK 22 22 42 21 PINE BEND REFINERY Lake 61CO17 0 . 3 Rebecca Conley U.S. LOCK & DAM NO. 2 SHEET NO.OF SHEETS DAKOTA COUNTY CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR 1 1/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : M o d e l : Ti t l e S h e e t [ S h e e t ] F i l e : \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 0 0 t s h . d g n 1500' PLAN 40 INDEX 20 20APPROVED APPROVED 6 THIS PLAN CONTAINS SHEETS6 1 - 2 3 5 SHEET NO.DESCRIPTION DESIGN SQUAD SIGNATURE: PRINT NAME: DATE: LICENSE # I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS SCALES INDEX MAP COUNTY PROJECT LOCATION : DATE SHEET NO. PLAN REVISIONS APPROVED BY 1/16/2025 P: 651.644.4389 F: 713.965.0044 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-2015 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN. THE 2020 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD TREE CLEARING AND FENCE REMOVAL PRELIMINARY DAKOTA COUNTY ENGINEER CITY OF - SWPPP PLANS & WATER RESOURCES NOTES REMOVAL PLANS CONSTRUCTION NOTES & ESTIMATED QUANTITIES TITLE SHEET PROJECT AREA GABRIEL FROMM, BRETT JOHNSON DAKOTA KENDAL RUSTEN JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 6 MINNESOTA RIVER GREENWAY TRAIL 0.3 MILES NORTH WEST OF COUNTY RD 42 AND PLEASANT DRLOCATED ON EXHIBIT A5 RIGHT OF WAY MONUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE ALL LAND, AND PROPERTY CORNERS, VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CONTROLS, AND SURVEYS AND RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION NOTES: TEMPORARY TURF ESTABLISHMENT THE R/W IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC 2104. ALL MATERIAL NOT UTILIZED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF OFF PERPETUATE DRAINAGE ON ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION (INCIDENTAL). CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT MUST BE RESTORED AS INDICATED ABOVE, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER AT THE ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WILL REQUIRE TURF ESTABLISHMENT. UTILITIES FACILITIES IN THE AREA. THE CONTACT MUST BE MADE THROUGH GOPHER STATE-ONE-CALL. THE CONTRACTOR IS HEARBY REMINDED OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER STATE LAW TO CONTACT ALL UTILITIES THAT MAY HAVE BY WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT: THE FOLLOWING UTILITY OWNERS MAY HAVE EXISTING FACILITIES IN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE UTILITIES WILL NOT BE AFFECTED UTILITIES." ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-22, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR INVESTIGATING AND DOCUMENTING EXISTING THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THE PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED FENCE REMOVAL REMOVED CHAIN FENCE SHALL BE REPLACED BY TEMPORARY FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPEC 2572 AND REINFORCEMENT POSTS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER THE FALL OF 2025. TEMPORARY FENCE INCLUDES HARDWARE FOR ATTATCHING TO EXISTING POSTS, CONNECTING FENCE SECTIONS TOGETHER, OR BE ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING THAT IS ATTATCHED TO EXISTING POSTS AND TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN TEMPORARY FENCE SHALL EITHER BE EXSISTING FENCE THAT IS SALVAGED AND INSTALLED BY REATTATCHING CHAIN LINK TO EXISTING POSTS REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE USED FOR TEMPORARY FENCE INSTALLATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING 5' CHAIN FENCE ONLY AS NECESSARY TO PERFORM CLEARING OPERATIONS. EXISTING POSTS SHALL CLEARING ALL CLEARED TREES AND DEBRIS MUST BE MOVED SO THAT NO TREE CLEARING MATERIALS ARE WITHIN 5' OF EXISTING TRAIL EDGE PERFORMED AT A LATER DATE BY OTHERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CLEARING WHERE INDICATED IN THE REMOVAL PLANS. GRUBBING AND ROOT CUTTING WILL BE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLACE ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS 3 DAYS PRIOR TO CLEARING ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLOSE THE TRAIL DURING CLEARING OPERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPEC 2563 S-271. (P) DENOTES PLAN QUANTITY ITEM ITEM NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION NOTES UNIT TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 2101.502 CLEARING (P)TREE 7 2101.505 CLEARING (P)ACRE 0.8 2104.503 REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 861 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 2572.503 TEMPORARY FENCE LIN FT 861 2573.503 SILT FENCE; TYPE HI LIN FT 2019 2573.502 CULVERT END CONTROLS EACH 1 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : sc n 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 2 5 s c n . d g n 1/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ T r e e _ R e m o v a l . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYXXX XXX XXX XXXX-XX XXX 6 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/16/2025 1/16/2025 CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR PRELIMINARY JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH ESTIMATED QUANTITIES CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND 1 1 2 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : RE M 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 0 r e m . d g n 1/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ T r e e _ R e m o v a l . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYXXX XXX XXX XXXX-XX XXX 6 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/16/2025 1/16/2025 CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR PRELIMINARY JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH S 0 1 1 0 CULVERT END CONTROL CLEARING REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE REMOVE TREE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SILT FENCE; TYPE HI EXISTING R/W PARCEL LINE TEMPORARY EASEMENT LEGEND MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 1 3 + 0 0 MATCHLINE STA. 109+50 40 SCALE IN FEET REMOVAL PLANS 1 3 3 CP 1 ALL FENCE REMOVAL LOCATIONS TEMPORARY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT NOTES: 1 CP CL MRG_TRAIL CL SCENIC OVERLOOK STA 109+76.55 BEGIN TRAIL RECONSTRUCTION F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : RE M 2 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 0 r e m . d g n 1/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ T r e e _ R e m o v a l . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYXXX XXX XXX XXXX-XX XXX 6 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/16/2025 1/16/2025 CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR PRELIMINARY JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 115 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION CLEARING REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE REMOVE TREE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SILT FENCE; TYPE HI EXISTING R/W PARCEL LINE LEGEND 40 SCALE IN FEET MATCHLINE STA. 113+00 MATCHLINE STA. 118+50 4 REMOVAL PLANS 2 3 1 1 NOTES: TEMPORARY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL FENCE REMOVAL LOCATIONS CL MRG_TRAIL F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : RE M 3 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 0 r e m . d g n 1/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ T r e e _ R e m o v a l . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYXXX XXX XXX XXXX-XX XXX 6 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/16/2025 1/16/2025 CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR PRELIMINARY JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 120 1 25 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION LEGEND CLEARING REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE REMOVE TREE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SILT FENCE; TYPE HI EXISTING R/W EXISTING RETAINING WALL 40 SCALE IN FEET MAT C HL I NE S T A. 1 1 8 + 5 0 REMOVAL PLANS 3 3 5 TEM PORARY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL FENCE REMOVAL LOCATIONS 1 NOTES: TEMPORARY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL FENCE REMOVAL LOCATIONS 1 CL MRG_TRAIL END TRAIL RECONSTRUCTION STA 2+00.48 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : SW P - S W P 0 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 0 s w p . d g n 1/ 7 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ T r e e _ R e m o v a l . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYXXX XXX XXX XXXX-XX XXX 6 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/16/2025 1/16/2025 CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR PRELIMINARY STA. OR R.P. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION RECEIVING WATER SPECIAL WATER INVASIVETMDLTROUT AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY (AES) AND INFESTED WATERS PROJECT CONTACTS ORGANIZATION PHONECONTACT NAME ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE 651-649-5451 OR 800-422-0798 MPCA DUTY OFFICER 24 HOUR EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION: AREA DISTURBEDTOTAL AREA SURFACE IMPERVIOUS EXISTINGTOTAL AREA SURFACE IMPERVIOUS PROPOSEDTOTAL AREA SURFACE IMPERVIOUS IN CHANGE NET PROPOSEDTOTAL LAND FEATURE CHANGES IMPAIRED WATER RECEIVING WATERS (A)CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENT, (B) NON-CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENT. OUTLINED IN APPENDIX A OF THE NPDES PERMIT. RELATED OR (B) NON-CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENTS. CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENTS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL BMPS AS RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE. THE IMPAIRED WATERS (LISTED IN TABLE ABOVE) ARE IMPAIRED FOR (A) CONSTRUCTION THE RECEIVING WATERS LISTED IN THE TABLE ABOVE ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE (AERIAL RADIUS) OF THE PROJECT LIMITS AND 0.00 ACRES 1.32 ACRES 1.32 ACRES 651-480-2369 SOIL TYPES TYPICALLY FOUND ON THIS PROJECT ARE SILTY SANDS AND CLAYEY SANDS. JOHN CAVENCITY OF HASTINGS DAKOTA COUNTY 651-554-6538MIKE ADAMS NEAR THE PROJECT BOUNDARY. IN ADDITION TO THE LIST OF SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE AWARE THAT THERE ARE WETLANDS WITHIN AND 0.00 ACRES CLEARING TREES AND FENCE FOR FUTURE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS, AS WELL AS PROVIDING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. THE PLANNED SCOPE OF THE PROJECT INCLUDES: AND EAGLE BLUFF DRIVE IN THE NORTHWESTERN CORNER OF HASTINGS, MN. THE MINNESOTA RIVER GREENWAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IS LOCATED DIRECTLY BETWEEN THE U.S. LOCK AND DAM 2 ON THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER TERMINATION HAS BEEN FILED. MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE NOTICE OF THE PROJECT ENGINEER AND CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN A WELL HEAD PROTECTION AREA. AGENCY REVIEW. ALL MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED IN THIS PLAN SET OR THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. THERE ARE NO STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR ALL TREE CLEARING ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO MARCH 31, 2025. ACCUMULATED DEBRIS OR THAT HAS BEEN DAMAGED. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY INSPECT, MAINTAIN, AND, IF NECESSARY, CLEAN OR REPLACE ANY BMPS WITH ALL TIMES. REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE BMP IS PLACED. KEEP ALL DEVICES IN GOOD FUNCTIONAL CONDITIONS AT WITH THE APROPPRIATE INLET PROTECTION DEVICE. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILL BE PAID FOR ONCE PER INLET COMMENCEMENT OF ANY REMOVAL WORK. PROTECT STORM SEWER AND CULVERT INLETS AS IDENTIFIED IN THESE PLANS EROSION AND CAPTURE SEDIMENT ON SITE. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE PLACED AS IDENTIFIED IN THIS PLANSET AND AS NECESSARY TO MINIMZE THE OWNER. WITH OATS AT 100 LB/AC AND USING BONDED FIBER MATRIX AT 3,500 LB/AC USING MNDOT SPEC 2575 AT NO COST TO SHOULD SOILS BE DISTURBED BY EQUIPMENT, THE SOILS SHALL BE FORMED BACK TO ITS PRIOR CONDITION AND SEEDED NO ACTIVITY SHALL REMOVE VEGETATION LESS THAN 6" FROM THE GROUND SURFACE OR DISTURB SOILS. LANDSCAPE. SO AS TO AVOID OBSTRUCTING, DIVERTING, OR CHANNELING THE NATRUAL PROCESS OF WATER MOVEMENT THROUGH THE SIDE SLOPES. TREES MUST BE LAID DIRECTLY DOWNHILL, OR AT UP TO A 45 DEGREE ANGLE FROM DIRECTLY DOWNHILL, TO COMPLY WITH WATERSHED REGULATIONS AND POLICY, CLEARED TREES MUST NOT BE LAID HORIZONTALLY ALONG THE THE PROJECT'S CONTRACT. FORMAL EROSION CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ARE NOT REQUIRED BEYOND THE ITEMS INCLUDED IN DISTURBING". BECAUSE CLEARING DOES NOT IMPACT THE SOIL ITSELF, NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY MEETS THE DEFINITION OF "LAND TREE CLEARING IS DEFINED AS THE REMOVAL OF ALL VEGETATION AT AND ABOVE 6" FROM THE GROUND SURFACE. CLEARING. ACTIVITIES AS A PART OF THIS CONTRACT ARE LIMITED TO EROSION CONTROL PLACEMENT, FENCE REMOVAL, AND TREE SOIL TYPES MISSISSIPPI RIVER (A) (B)AQC, AQL, AQR & MORE MULTIPLE 6 SWPPP PLANS 1 1 DAKOTA COUNTY CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR EXHIBIT A6 \\hrgreen.com\HRG\Data\2022\2202947\Design\Permits\MRCCA_Submitted_2025.03.03\mem-2025.05.28-EngineersStatement.docx Page 1 of 1 MEMO To: Justin Fortney, City Planner From: Jordan Horejsi, P.E. Subject: Engineer’s Statement Regarding Retaining Walls Project Number: 2202947 Date: May 28, 2025 The MRCCA Land Alteration Permit Application requires the following: For retaining walls and rip rap exceeding these design standards, submit design drawings and a statement by a professional engineer testifying that a larger structure is needed to correct the erosion problem. Please see the Statement from Jordan Horejsi, P.E. (52241) below: The proposed retaining wall is a maximum of 7 feet in height. This larger structure will limit the grading required for the MRG improvements, preserve the existing retaining wall, and allow for ADA compliant trail to be constructed. See Sheet 15 in the Exhibit A4 100% Plans. The change in trail elevation is 8 feet in the lower tangent portion of the trail and affected the alignment of the trail adjacent to the existing retaining wall. Keeping the trail on the same alignment with the lowered elevation would require removal of the existing wall and then construction of a 20-foot-tall retaining wall in its same location. By shifting the trail away from the existing retaining wall, the proposed wall can be constructed in front (north) of the existing retaining wall. The new wall will be 7 feet at its tallest point, giving a tiered wall aesthetic with approximately 15 feet of vegetation between the walls. Reconstructing a 20-foot-tall high wall would have had significant impact to the cost of the project and would have had impacts to vegetation behind the wall for grading and construction. The height of the new wall is necessitated by the offset from the existing retaining wall and the elevation of the proposed trail. To keep separation between the existing and proposed retaining wall greater than 10 feet and to keep the slope between the walls at 1:6 or flatter, the wall height is 7 feet for portions of the wall. Slopes steeper than 1:6 between the walls are not desired in order to mitigate erosion and provide support for the existing wall foundation. Reducing the proposed wall height would require raising the trail profile which would push the longitudinal slope above 5% or would require pushing the alignment of the trail farther from the existing wall which has large impacts. Moving the trail even farther from the existing retaining wall would increase tree removal, increase the land alteration footprint and put more hard surface trail on the existing greater than 30% slope. The proposed alignment, trail elevation, wall alignment, and slope between the walls balances the constraints due to the surrounding topography and keeps the wall height as close to the maximum 5 feet height as possible. Additionally, the trail alignment benefits from shifting away from the existing alignment by providing space for a compliant horizontal curve without pushing the higher segment of the trail into private property and impacting the existing water quality basin. ________________________ Jordan Horejsi, P.E. Exhibit A7 1/30/2025 Mississippi River Corridor Critical Area (MRCCA) – Vegetation Clearing Permit Application Directions. Within the MRCCA, all intensive vegetation clearing in Primary Conservation Areas (PCAs) requires a vegetation clearing permit and restoration plan. A complete permit application is needed to evaluate compliance with the city of Hastings’ vegetation clearing standards. Please review the Property Owner Guidance for Vegetation Clearing Permits before completing this application. Applicant Information Property Owner: Dakota County; Mike Adams, Greenways Senior Project Manager Contractor/Agent: Ted McCaslin (HR Green) Mailing Address: 14955 Galaxie Ave; Apple Valley, MN 55124 Mailing Address: 2550 University Ave. Suite 400N, St. Paul, MN, 55104 Phone: 651-5546538 Phone: 651-659-7708 Email: Mike.Adams@co.dakota.mn.us Email: tmccaslin@hrgreen.com Site information Site Address: N/A Parcel #: 196390000030, 190200077011, 196390002170, 196390002160, 196390002150, 196390002140, 196390002130, 196390002120, 196390002110, 196390002100 1. Identify the Primary Conservation Areas (PCAs) in which intensive vegetation clearing is proposed. View the DNR’s online PCA mapper to determine if your proposed clearing activity will occur in any of these PCAs (check all that apply). If none, do not complete this application. ☒ Shore impact zone ☒ Areas within 50 feet of a wetland or natural drainage route ☒ Bluff impact zone ☒ Areas containing native plant communities ☒ Significant existing vegetative stands 2. Identify the purpose(s) of the proposed intensive vegetation clearing (check all that apply): ☐ Clearing of vegetation that is dead, diseased, dying, or hazardous ☐ Clearing to prevent the spread of diseases or insect pests ☐ Clearing to remove invasive non-native species ☐ Clearing to prepare for restoration and erosion control management activities consistent with a plan approved by the City of Hastings. ☒ The minimum clearing necessary for development allowed with a building permit or allowed as an exemption under Section 12 of Chapter section 152A, of the city of Hastings. Note: All other intensive vegetation clearing within PCAs is prohibited. EXHIBIT B1 Previous Submittal Sent January 2025 1/30/2025 3. Explain how the proposed clearing is the minimum necessary and designed to blend with the natural terrain and minimize visual impacts to public river corridor views and other scenic views. If the clearing is required for development allowed with a permit, also explain how the project was located to minimize the removal or disturbance of natural vegetation: Click or tap here to enter text. The proposed tree clearing and grading will accommodate Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) – compliant improvements to a reconstructed segment of the Mississippi River Greenway trail (MRG), improve trail safety and maintenance, and improve overall native vegetative cover within the project area. The project includes improvements to 7,794 linear feet of the MRG. The improvements include pavement rehabilitations through mill and overall or full depth reclamation construction within the existing trail alignment and width. However, reconstruction and vegetative clearing will occur along 1,621 linear feet of the existing trail, the reconstruction area, including areas within the Bluff Impact Zone. Overall, the reconstruction area will disturb 2.35 acres of vegetation, mostly through excavation to lessen the trail slope to the MRG alignment on top of the dam at Lock and Dam #2. The reconstruction area construction will result in the reduction in the overall trail length by 317 feet through alignment changes and demolition trail in a little-used overlook area. The overlook trail paved area will be converted to native vegetation. The project minimizes the disturbance area while meeting project goals. An existing retaining wall will remain in place and a separate retaining wall below it will limit excavation required in the area adjacent to the existing trail. Additionally, protective wildlife-passable fence will be used to protect trail users from steep drop-off at the trail’s edge as opposed to grading adjacent slopes. Visual impacts to the river corridor will be minimized through minimizing tree clearing below the bluff line. Project excavation will reduce the overall profile and limit views from the river of clearing. 4. Describe (and attach photo of) the vegetation being removed (ground cover, understory, tree), and names of plants, if known: Vegetation being removed includes maintained grass adjacent to the existing trail; planted spruce, pine and oak trees; naturalized woody vegetation including eastern red cedar, Siberian elm, riverbank grape, and common buckthorn; planted switchgrass and smooth brome in unmaintained grassy areas; and small areas of native vegetation including silver maple, red oak, bur oak and basswood. See attached photos. 5. Explain how vegetation removal activities will be conducted or phased in order to expose the smallest area of soil to erosion for the least possible time: The initial project action is to cut trees prior to April 1, 2025 to limit potential impacts to protected bats and maintain a project a construction schedule during the bat presence season (roughly April 1 – October 31). The initial tree clearing will cut trees, but no grubbing of roots ground disturbance will occur outside of equipment movement. Any disturbance will be stabilized 1/30/2025 by temporary turf establishment and placement of wood chips on disturbed areas. While not required for tree cutting, silt fence and storm drain inlet protection will occur prior to the tree clearing. See attached removal plans. A more detailed stormwater pollution prevention plan and vegetation restoration will occur as part of the final design of the project. 6. Identify the restoration priority areas on your property (check all that apply and show on submitted aerial photo or site plan): ☐ Areas with soils showing signs of erosion, especially on or near the top and bottom of steep slopes and bluffs ☐ Shoreline areas within 25 of the water with no natural vegetation, degraded vegetation, or planted with turf grass. ☐ Areas on steep slopes and bluffs that are visible from the river with no natural vegetation, degraded vegetation, or planted with turf grass. ☒ None of the above exist. The following restoration opportunity area is proposed instead: See restoration plan details below. Restoration Plan Performance Standards. All activities requiring a vegetation clearing permit require a planting plan that must meet the following standards: · Restored vegetation is planted in one or more of the restoration priority areas or opportunity areas identified under #6. · Restored vegetation provides suitable habitat, and effective soil stability, runoff retention, and infiltration capability to address concerns specific to the priority or opportunity area. · If any highly erodible soils are disturbed during removal and/or restoration, they are stabilized by deep-rooted vegetation with a high stem density. · The area (sq. ft.) of the restored vegetation is similar to that removed to the greatest extent practicable. · For restoration of removed native plant communities (identified under #1), restored vegetation must also provide biological and ecological function equivalent to the removed native plant communities. Vegetation species, composition, density, and diversity must be guided by nearby patches of native plant communities. The area (sq. ft.) of the restored vegetation should be equivalent to that removed. Submittal Requirements. Submit all of the following along with this application form: ☒ An aerial photo and/or site plan showing:  Property boundaries  Location and label of existing PCAs identified under #1  The location and area (sq. ft.) of the vegetation proposed to be cleared within identified PCAs  Location and area (sq. ft.) of the restored vegetation in the priority areas identified under #6 See attached ☒ Photos of the vegetation proposed for removal. See attached ☒ A planting plan(s) for the identified restoration priority area(s) showing the location, type (ground cover, understory, tree), and name of proposed plants. A plant list with codes referencing plants shown on the plan is suggested for complex plans. Property owners may complete their own planting plan, provided the submitted plan meets the relevant performance standards. If the plan 1/30/2025 does not meet the standards, a qualified landscape professional recognized by the city of Hastings will be needed. A restoration and planting plan will be developed as the project advances to final design. While the precise location, soil preparation, seeding rates, and tree and shrub mixes are still in development some details consistent with Dakota County’s Greenway Design Guidelines and Natural Resources Management Plan are known and will be implemented to ensure the project meets the restoration plan performance standards described in this application. At a minimum: · Disturbed soils will be stabilized and prepared for native seed and planting restoration. · Restoration areas will provide suitable habitat, runoff retention, and infiltration capacity. · The area of restored native vegetation will exceed the area of disturbed vegetation. This will be accomplished from native vegetation restoration over approximately x feet/acres of demolition of the existing overlook trail loop and overall shortening of the MRG trail in the remaining reconstruction area. · Disturbed areas will be reseeded with a two-foot wide buffer of a low-grow fescue mix on both sides of the new trail alignment. Other areas will be stabilized with temporary seeding as appropriate and permanently seeded with an upland prairie mix or shady woodland mix. · Restored tree and shrub areas will be planted using the following native species. Many of which were observed within clear areas and nearby in more robust native forest areas. Canopy Trees & Understory Trees Quercus alba White oak Quercus macrocarpa Bur oak Quercus rubra Northern red oak Ulmus americana American elm Understory Trees Ostrya virginiana Ironwood Prunus serotina Black cherry Tilia americana Basswood Shrubs Amelanchier interior Juneberry Amelanchier laevis Allegheny serviceberry Cornus alternifolia Pagoda dogwood Cornus racemosa Gray dogwood Corylus americana American hazelnut Diervilla lonicera Bush honeysuckle Prunus virginiana Chokecherry Rosa arkansana Prairie rose Rosa blanda Smooth wild rose Sambucus racemosa Red-berried Elder Symphoricarpos alba Snowberry Viburnum lentago Nannyberry 1/30/2025 For large, complex projects, also provide: These items to be provided with final design submittal ☒ Planting plan completed by a qualified person as defined by the city of Hastings ☒ Scaled plans, surveys, and drawings. ☒ A three-year maintenance plan that includes provisions for controlling invasive species and plant replacement. For restoration of native plant communities, also provide: ☒ Identification of the type and location of nearby native plant communities used to guide restoration. Nearby plant communities are generalized into four plant communities: · Maintained turfgrass comprised of fescues, bluegrass, and common lawn weeds. · Open unmaintained grassland comprised of smooth brome, native switchgrass (likely planted after the existing trail construction), and interspersed with young cedar and other adventive woody species and several planted oak and evergreen species. · Native woods primarily located below the bluff line and adjacent to the Mississippi River comprised of oak species (red, white, and bur observed), basswood, ironwood, native elms · Disturbed woods primarily located inside of the trails hairpin turn and above the bluff line comprised of mostly of Siberian elm, buckthorn and cedar but with interspersed native red oak, bur oak, basswood, and ironwood. Disturbed woods are mainly in current forested areas shown as disturbed and treeless in this 1957 aerial photo comparison. 1/30/2025 Signatures I certify that the information contained in this application is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I grant the city of Hastings officials permission to enter the subject property for inspection of the vegetation removal and restoration sites during normal business hours until three years from the date of the certificate of completion. This is to insure adherence to the maintenance conditions of the permit. I understand failure to conform to approved plans and conditions or to comply with lawful directives to abate violations arising from work undertaken contrary to this permit may be cause for future enforcement actions to remedy said violations. Property owner signature: Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Contractor signature (if applicable): Date: Click or tap to enter a date. Photo 1- South facing, trees adjacent to existing trail and fence in western extent of existing trail Photo 2- East facing, narrow teardrop shape of vegetation to be removed with trail demolition in existing lookout loop MRG Trail – Vegetation Clearing Photos Photo 3- East facing, vegetation located north of existing trail along steep portion. Narrow band of vegetation to be cleared on north (left) side of fence. Photo 4- North facing, Smooth sumac vegetation located north of fence and trail near intersection to overlook MRG Trail – Vegetation Clearing Photos Photo 5- West facing, cedar dominant woody vegetation located north of trail before hairpin turn Photo 6- East facing, existing trail and woody vegetation located north of trail. Retaining wall to remain. MRG Trail – Vegetation Clearing Photos Photo 7- South facing, grass and small woody vegetation located west of existing trail with development in background Photo 8- West facing from drone, existing trail and surrounding vegetation MRG Trail – Vegetation Clearing Photos 42 21 PINE BEND REFINERY Lake 61CO17 0 . 3 Rebecca Conley U.S. LOCK & DAM NO. 2 SHEET NO.OF SHEETS DAKOTA COUNTY CONSTRUCTION PLAN FOR 1 1/ 1 5 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : M o d e l : Ti t l e S h e e t [ S h e e t ] F i l e : \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 0 0 t s h . d g n 1500' PLAN 40 INDEX 20 20APPROVED APPROVED 6 THIS PLAN CONTAINS SHEETS6 1 - 2 3 5 SHEET NO.DESCRIPTION DESIGN SQUAD SIGNATURE: PRINT NAME: DATE: LICENSE # I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS SCALES INDEX MAP COUNTY PROJECT LOCATION : DATE SHEET NO. PLAN REVISIONS APPROVED BY 1/16/2025 P: 651.644.4389 F: 713.965.0044 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-2015 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION" SHALL GOVERN. THE 2020 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION "STANDARD TREE CLEARING AND FENCE REMOVAL PRELIMINARY DAKOTA COUNTY ENGINEER CITY OF - SWPPP PLANS & WATER RESOURCES NOTES REMOVAL PLANS CONSTRUCTION NOTES & ESTIMATED QUANTITIES TITLE SHEET PROJECT AREA GABRIEL FROMM, BRETT JOHNSON DAKOTA KENDAL RUSTEN JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 6 MINNESOTA RIVER GREENWAY TRAIL 0.3 MILES NORTH WEST OF COUNTY RD 42 AND PLEASANT DRLOCATED ON RIGHT OF WAY MONUMENTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRESERVE ALL LAND, AND PROPERTY CORNERS, VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL CONTROLS, AND SURVEYS AND RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION NOTES: TEMPORARY TURF ESTABLISHMENT THE R/W IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC 2104. ALL MATERIAL NOT UTILIZED ON THIS PROJECT SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND DISPOSED OF OFF PERPETUATE DRAINAGE ON ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION (INCIDENTAL). CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT MUST BE RESTORED AS INDICATED ABOVE, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE OWNER AT THE ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WILL REQUIRE TURF ESTABLISHMENT. UTILITIES FACILITIES IN THE AREA. THE CONTACT MUST BE MADE THROUGH GOPHER STATE-ONE-CALL. THE CONTRACTOR IS HEARBY REMINDED OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES UNDER STATE LAW TO CONTACT ALL UTILITIES THAT MAY HAVE BY WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT: THE FOLLOWING UTILITY OWNERS MAY HAVE EXISTING FACILITIES IN THE AREA OF CONSTRUCTION. THESE UTILITIES WILL NOT BE AFFECTED UTILITIES." ACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-22, ENTITLED "STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR INVESTIGATING AND DOCUMENTING EXISTING THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THE PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED FENCE REMOVAL REMOVED CHAIN FENCE SHALL BE REPLACED BY TEMPORARY FENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPEC 2572 AND REINFORCEMENT POSTS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER THE FALL OF 2025. TEMPORARY FENCE INCLUDES HARDWARE FOR ATTATCHING TO EXISTING POSTS, CONNECTING FENCE SECTIONS TOGETHER, OR BE ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING THAT IS ATTATCHED TO EXISTING POSTS AND TO REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IN TEMPORARY FENCE SHALL EITHER BE EXSISTING FENCE THAT IS SALVAGED AND INSTALLED BY REATTATCHING CHAIN LINK TO EXISTING POSTS REMAIN IN PLACE AND BE USED FOR TEMPORARY FENCE INSTALLATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING 5' CHAIN FENCE ONLY AS NECESSARY TO PERFORM CLEARING OPERATIONS. EXISTING POSTS SHALL CLEARING ALL CLEARED TREES AND DEBRIS MUST BE MOVED SO THAT NO TREE CLEARING MATERIALS ARE WITHIN 5' OF EXISTING TRAIL EDGE PERFORMED AT A LATER DATE BY OTHERS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM CLEARING WHERE INDICATED IN THE REMOVAL PLANS. GRUBBING AND ROOT CUTTING WILL BE TRAFFIC CONTROL PLACE ADVANCED WARNING SIGNS 3 DAYS PRIOR TO CLEARING ACTIVITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLOSE THE TRAIL DURING CLEARING OPERATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT SPEC 2563 S-271. (P) DENOTES PLAN QUANTITY ITEM ITEM NUMBER ITEM DESCRIPTION NOTES UNIT TOTAL ESTIMATED QUANTITY 2021.501 MOBILIZATION LUMP SUM 1 2101.502 CLEARING (P)TREE 7 2101.505 CLEARING (P)ACRE 0.8 2104.503 REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE LIN FT 861 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL LUMP SUM 1 2572.503 TEMPORARY FENCE LIN FT 861 2573.503 SILT FENCE; TYPE HI LIN FT 2019 2573.502 CULVERT END CONTROLS EACH 1 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : sc n 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 2 5 s c n . d g n 1/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ T r e e _ R e m o v a l . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYXXX XXX XXX XXXX-XX XXX 6 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/16/2025 1/16/2025 CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR PRELIMINARY JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH ESTIMATED QUANTITIES CONSTRUCTION NOTES AND 1 1 2 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : RE M 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 0 r e m . d g n 1/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ T r e e _ R e m o v a l . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYXXX XXX XXX XXXX-XX XXX 6 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/16/2025 1/16/2025 CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR PRELIMINARY JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH S 0 1 1 0 CULVERT END CONTROL CLEARING REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE REMOVE TREE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SILT FENCE; TYPE HI EXISTING R/W PARCEL LINE TEMPORARY EASEMENT LEGEND MA T C H L I N E S T A . 1 1 3 + 0 0 MATCHLINE STA. 109+50 40 SCALE IN FEET REMOVAL PLANS 1 3 3 CP 1 ALL FENCE REMOVAL LOCATIONS TEMPORARY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT NOTES: 1 CP CL MRG_TRAIL CL SCENIC OVERLOOK STA 109+76.55 BEGIN TRAIL RECONSTRUCTION F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : RE M 2 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 0 r e m . d g n 1/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ T r e e _ R e m o v a l . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYXXX XXX XXX XXXX-XX XXX 6 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/16/2025 1/16/2025 CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR PRELIMINARY JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 115 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION CLEARING REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE REMOVE TREE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SILT FENCE; TYPE HI EXISTING R/W PARCEL LINE LEGEND 40 SCALE IN FEET MATCHLINE STA. 113+00 MATCHLINE STA. 118+50 4 REMOVAL PLANS 2 3 1 1 NOTES: TEMPORARY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL FENCE REMOVAL LOCATIONS CL MRG_TRAIL F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : RE M 3 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 1 8 0 r e m . d g n 1/ 1 6 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ T r e e _ R e m o v a l . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYXXX XXX XXX XXXX-XX XXX 6 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/16/2025 1/16/2025 CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR PRELIMINARY JORDAN R HOREJSI 52241 JRH 120 1 25 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION LEGEND CLEARING REMOVE CHAIN LINK FENCE REMOVE TREE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SILT FENCE; TYPE HI EXISTING R/W EXISTING RETAINING WALL 40 SCALE IN FEET MAT C HL I NE S T A. 1 1 8 + 5 0 REMOVAL PLANS 3 3 5 TEM PORARY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL FENCE REMOVAL LOCATIONS 1 NOTES: TEMPORARY FENCE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL FENCE REMOVAL LOCATIONS 1 CL MRG_TRAIL END TRAIL RECONSTRUCTION STA 2+00.48 F i l e : P l o t D r v r : Mn D O T - p d f . p l t c f g M o d e l : SW P - S W P 0 1 [ S h e e t ] \\ h r g r e e n . c o m \ h r g \ D a t a \ 2 0 2 2 \ 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 \ C A D \ R o a d _ D e s i g n \ s h e e t s _ t r e e _ r e m o v a l _ p l a n s \ C D 2 2 0 2 9 4 7 _ 3 2 0 s w p . d g n 1/ 7 / 2 0 2 5 La s t S a v e d : Pe n T b l : hr g _ T r e e _ R e m o v a l . t b l SHEET OF DESIGNED CHECKED APPROVED JOB NO. DRAWN DATE NO.APR.DATEBYREVISIONS SHEET OF DAKOTA COUNTYXXX XXX XXX XXXX-XX XXX 6 TYPED NAME DATE LIC. NO. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED P: 651.644.4389 F: 651.644.9446 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114-1052 2550 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W., SUITE 400N COURT INTERNATIONAL BUILDING 1/16/2025 1/16/2025 CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR PRELIMINARY STA. OR R.P. STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION RECEIVING WATER SPECIAL WATER INVASIVETMDLTROUT AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY (AES) AND INFESTED WATERS PROJECT CONTACTS ORGANIZATION PHONECONTACT NAME ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SITE MANAGEMENT, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE 651-649-5451 OR 800-422-0798 MPCA DUTY OFFICER 24 HOUR EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION: AREA DISTURBEDTOTAL AREA SURFACE IMPERVIOUS EXISTINGTOTAL AREA SURFACE IMPERVIOUS PROPOSEDTOTAL AREA SURFACE IMPERVIOUS IN CHANGE NET PROPOSEDTOTAL LAND FEATURE CHANGES IMPAIRED WATER RECEIVING WATERS (A)CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENT, (B) NON-CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENT. OUTLINED IN APPENDIX A OF THE NPDES PERMIT. RELATED OR (B) NON-CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENTS. CONSTRUCTION RELATED IMPAIRMENTS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL BMPS AS RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE. THE IMPAIRED WATERS (LISTED IN TABLE ABOVE) ARE IMPAIRED FOR (A) CONSTRUCTION THE RECEIVING WATERS LISTED IN THE TABLE ABOVE ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE (AERIAL RADIUS) OF THE PROJECT LIMITS AND 0.00 ACRES 1.32 ACRES 1.32 ACRES 651-480-2369 SOIL TYPES TYPICALLY FOUND ON THIS PROJECT ARE SILTY SANDS AND CLAYEY SANDS. JOHN CAVENCITY OF HASTINGS DAKOTA COUNTY 651-554-6538MIKE ADAMS NEAR THE PROJECT BOUNDARY. IN ADDITION TO THE LIST OF SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE AWARE THAT THERE ARE WETLANDS WITHIN AND 0.00 ACRES CLEARING TREES AND FENCE FOR FUTURE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS, AS WELL AS PROVIDING EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. THE PLANNED SCOPE OF THE PROJECT INCLUDES: AND EAGLE BLUFF DRIVE IN THE NORTHWESTERN CORNER OF HASTINGS, MN. THE MINNESOTA RIVER GREENWAY TRAIL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IS LOCATED DIRECTLY BETWEEN THE U.S. LOCK AND DAM 2 ON THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER TERMINATION HAS BEEN FILED. MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE NOTICE OF THE PROJECT ENGINEER AND CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND THIS PROJECT IS LOCATED IN A WELL HEAD PROTECTION AREA. AGENCY REVIEW. ALL MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED IN THIS PLAN SET OR THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. THERE ARE NO STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR ALL TREE CLEARING ACTIVITY MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO MARCH 31, 2025. ACCUMULATED DEBRIS OR THAT HAS BEEN DAMAGED. CONTRACTOR SHALL REGULARLY INSPECT, MAINTAIN, AND, IF NECESSARY, CLEAN OR REPLACE ANY BMPS WITH ALL TIMES. REGARDLESS OF THE NUMBER OF TIMES THE BMP IS PLACED. KEEP ALL DEVICES IN GOOD FUNCTIONAL CONDITIONS AT WITH THE APROPPRIATE INLET PROTECTION DEVICE. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WILL BE PAID FOR ONCE PER INLET COMMENCEMENT OF ANY REMOVAL WORK. PROTECT STORM SEWER AND CULVERT INLETS AS IDENTIFIED IN THESE PLANS EROSION AND CAPTURE SEDIMENT ON SITE. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE PLACED AS IDENTIFIED IN THIS PLANSET AND AS NECESSARY TO MINIMZE THE OWNER. WITH OATS AT 100 LB/AC AND USING BONDED FIBER MATRIX AT 3,500 LB/AC USING MNDOT SPEC 2575 AT NO COST TO SHOULD SOILS BE DISTURBED BY EQUIPMENT, THE SOILS SHALL BE FORMED BACK TO ITS PRIOR CONDITION AND SEEDED NO ACTIVITY SHALL REMOVE VEGETATION LESS THAN 6" FROM THE GROUND SURFACE OR DISTURB SOILS. LANDSCAPE. SO AS TO AVOID OBSTRUCTING, DIVERTING, OR CHANNELING THE NATRUAL PROCESS OF WATER MOVEMENT THROUGH THE SIDE SLOPES. TREES MUST BE LAID DIRECTLY DOWNHILL, OR AT UP TO A 45 DEGREE ANGLE FROM DIRECTLY DOWNHILL, TO COMPLY WITH WATERSHED REGULATIONS AND POLICY, CLEARED TREES MUST NOT BE LAID HORIZONTALLY ALONG THE THE PROJECT'S CONTRACT. FORMAL EROSION CONTROL AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ARE NOT REQUIRED BEYOND THE ITEMS INCLUDED IN DISTURBING". BECAUSE CLEARING DOES NOT IMPACT THE SOIL ITSELF, NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY MEETS THE DEFINITION OF "LAND TREE CLEARING IS DEFINED AS THE REMOVAL OF ALL VEGETATION AT AND ABOVE 6" FROM THE GROUND SURFACE. CLEARING. ACTIVITIES AS A PART OF THIS CONTRACT ARE LIMITED TO EROSION CONTROL PLACEMENT, FENCE REMOVAL, AND TREE SOIL TYPES MISSISSIPPI RIVER (A) (B)AQC, AQL, AQR & MORE MULTIPLE 6 SWPPP PLANS 1 1