Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHPC Packet 08-20-2024HASTINGS HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION Agenda for Meeting of August 20, 2024 Regular business at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall in the Volunteer Room I. Call to Order and Quorum II. Minutes: A. July 16, 2024 III. Certificate of Approval Review A. 306 2nd St West - Landscaping Project IV. OHDS — Original Hastings Design Standards Review V. Business and Information A. Mailing notification discussion B. Update on the zoning code update C. Upcoming State Preservation Conference opportunity VI. Adjourn The next regularly scheduled meeting will be held on September 17, 2024 at Hastings City Hall HASTINGS HERITAGE PRESERVATION COMMISSION Minutes of the Meeting of July 16, 2024 Held at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall, Volunteer Room I. Call to Order and Quorum Youngren, Borchardt, Peterson, McCoy, Bremer, Simacek, and Toppin Absent, Alitz Edell, and Smith Staff: Fortney II. Minutes: A. June 18, 2024 Approved by Chair Toppin III. Certificate of Approval Review — Public Hearing A. 315 7th St W — Historic house demolition Fortney presented the staff report. Chair Toppin opened the public hearing at 7:17 pm and asked Fortney to explain the HPC's burden of required findings for demolition from the context of other recent structures that individuals said should be demolished but were successfully restored. Fortney explained that the other projects had major issues that were addressed, and the structures were restored. He said the applicant's designer, listed issues that need to be repaired and provided the opinion that the structure should be demolished. Fortney added that the findings required to get from the structure issues to the determination that demolition is the only safe or reasonable remedy is missing. Michael and Amy Van Ze, neighbors at 309 7th St W commented that the house has been vacant for 16 -years and the principal owner during that time didn't complete much work and had been asking too much when he sold it. They added that the last two people who lived in the house did so with a leaking roof, which was only replaced much later. Speaking on behalf of the applicant, Travis Dunn with Dunn Building Solutions said he has determined that the cost of renovation is prohibitively high because 90% the materials of structural elements are rotted. He added that the structural elements must be completely replaced by new ones because of that high level of rot. He said this doesn't let him place an estimate on restoration because it can't be done. He said a total replacement cost of the structure as it exists is $500,000. Dunn said previous structures with even extensive damage did not have widespread materials that were compromised. Chair Toppin asked what the demolition history is for designated properties in the city. Fortney said to his knowledge, the only designated structures to be approved for demolition by the HPC were damaged by fire so severely they were unsafe to enter for repair. He added that the HPC must report their actions to the State Historic Preservation Office, including demolitions. Chair Toppin closed the public hearing at 7:54 Motion by Commissioner Bremer to approve the request based on the following findings of fact, seconded by Commissioner McCoy. Approved 7-0 - No reasonable alternatives exist to the demolition because according to Tavis Dunn, the applicant's consulted contract building official, the restoration is not possible due to 90% of the structural materials being rotted. - Acting as a consulted contractor, Dunn estimates the rebuilding of the structure as it exists to be $500,000. - The Commission finds that without any original materials left, rebuilding of the structure would not maintain the historical significance. - The Commission also finds the cost of rebuilding the structure is not reasonable given the value of the structure. B. 413 2"a St W — Relocate adjacent house as a two -car garage. Fortney presented the staff report. Chair Toppin opened the public hearing at 7:55 pm. Commissioner Bremer asked if the garage would be located behind the front of the house. Fred Weiland, applicant, said it would be behind the porch but even with the front of the house. Commissioner Simacek asked if the garage would be placed on fill to bring it up to grade. Weiland said the site would be mostly balanced between the high and low elevations and added that he would prefer a variance to move it slightly closer to the street. John Phelps, owner of 301 2"`' Street West spoke in favor of the request. Chair Toppin closed the Public Hearing at 8:10 pm Motion by Commissioner Borchardt to approve the request, seconded by Commissioner Simacek. Approved 7-0 IV. Certificate of Approval Review A. 215 7th St W — Porch modifications Fortney presented the staff report. The commission discussed the porch skirting compared to other area homes. The commission noted the subject porches foundation is solid block compared to other homes with wooden and masonry piers. They said the skirting should highlight the porches structural design. Motion by Commissioner Simacek to approve the proposed flooring, seconded by Commissioner Youngren. Approved 7-0 Motion by Commissioner Peterson to approve the proposed porch skirting, seconded by Commissioner Youngren. Approved 7-0 Motion by Commissioner Borchardt to approve the relocation and design of the porch stairs, seconded by Commissioner Bremer. Approved 7-0 B. 618 Ramsey St — Fencing Fortney presented the staff report. The commission approved 7-0 without discussion. Motion by Commissioner Simacek to approve the proposed fence panels, seconded by Commissioner Borchardt. Approved 7-0 C. 221 Sibley St — Add 6 basement unit exhaust ports in exterior walls Fortney presented the staff report. The commissioner Borchardt commented that none of the proposal ideas were very appropriate, but he understood the difficulties. He added that a flat door vent would be less conspicuous. The commission approved the applicant preferred proposal 7-0 in the front bulkhead because it would not affect any historic material or eliminate any windows. They added a condition that they see an example of the proposed metal awning mentioned to cover the vents. They also recommended the owner consider some flat vents available if they are rated and appropriate for the use. Motion by Commissioner Borchardt to approve the applicant's preferred option in the front of the building with the proposed flashing hood, with the following condition, seconded by Commissioner McCoy. Approved 7-0 An example of the proposed flashing hood be shown to the HPC. V. OHDS — Original Hastings Design Standards Review VI. Business and Information VII. Adjourn Motion by Commissioner Borchardt to adjourn at 9:06 pm, seconded by Commissioner Youngren. Approved 7-0 Respectfully Submitted - Justin Fortney CERTIFICATE APPLICATION 306 2nd Street West. John Stebbings & Mellanie Walser — Hardscaping and fence Ca. 1890, West 2nd Street Historic District- Contributing Request: 1. Install an 8' by 8' concrete patio 2. Tiered raised garden beds, 24" in height (due to the elevation change) tumbled concrete stone blocks. 3. Dry creek bed hardscape feature to manage runoff and drainage 4. Steps - classic -cut rockface concrete blocks 5. Extend approved fencing along Lock and Dam Road at 42" high. Ordinance, Guidelines Design Guidelines pg. 31 11: Fences and Walls 2. New Fences New fences should be compatible with the architectural character, materials, and scale of the principal building and surrounding streetscape. Fences enclosing the front yard should be semi -transparent. Appropriate materials include wrought iron and painted wooden pickets. In general, complete enclosure by opaque fences is not appropriate. 5. New Retaining Walls New walls should be compatible with the architectural character and scale of the principal building and surrounding streetscape. Masonry retaining walls should be finished with caps and other appropriate details. Limestone, brick, and natural -color split - face (rock -face) concrete block are appropriate materials for the construction of new retaining walls visible from the public right-of-way. Block with a round, striated, or polygonal profile is not appropriate. Landscape timber is not appropriate for new retaining walls visible from the public right of way. Pg. 32 12: Public Landscaping and Streetscape 3. Retaining walls should be compatible with traditional walls in Hastings, which were primarily limestone, brick, and poured concrete. While splitface (rock -face) concrete block is appropriate for the construction of new retaining walls, block with a round, striated, or polygonal profile should be avoided. Staff Findings The proposed planters, steps, and dry creek bed will presumably be at ground level at their west and southern extents, where the ground is high. The area will be terraced lower with the proposed improvements towards the alley and Lock and Dam Road intersection. Additionally, the proposed plantings will further obscure the improvements. The materials are consistent with the approved retaining wall. The proposed fence is open and under 42 -inches (3.5') and the same style as the existing approved fence. Proposed Changes Type of work to be done Property hardscaping Detailed Description of the proposed work Experiencing significant erosion on the new retaining wall area built Fall of 2023. Worked with professional landscape designer to develop erosion control. The first phase includes patio, tiered raised garden beds (due to the elevation change), dry creek beds to manage runoff and drainage, and the area filled with plants and bushes. This has been designed in such a way to maintain the structural integrity of the new retaining wall and eliminate the further damage and erosion to the site. K411,A4J urns awrKFUZGLS) AR804..vIrAF 1,GyR00r591Rv (°3) ■ rut .[NicOeN 3.5-4 .01/4, C_ZelatetaiWi qp • O .. O l °� iM 4' WIDE 4%$� � .46411414 1. X11 iv WALL* `1 • RMItETl8OXE t+WMLe. 54.44 1 306 2nd St. West — Landscaping Project Owners: John Stebbings & Mellanie Walser 91,I5.EA ARI,DALWREATFF (3) UiM54.&RK 0LLMMFR NE. C4) 6,9f5$ Ex. 6X. Woo' DRIVEWAY vRN ro K. BEn 3-t," RIP RAT ARAORV ITAF 9"ECNNY (b) n.ylaLv MML,Jk Loh (-t) Project Overview • Project location is northwest corner of property • Hardscaping includes: o 8' X 8' X 3" concrete slab patio o Block planters 24" High (pg. 2) o Stone steps (pg. 2) o Stone boulder dry creek bed (pg. 2) • Extend fencing (pg. 3) • Soft-scaping includes: o Various plants and bushes N 89°34'02" E o Plantings will not extend beyond property line GRAVEL ALLEY'_ N 89°35'50" E 64.7 C13=N 050. C=13491 A =3'501'46 R=201 .10 � �L=13.49 II+ J L 0 0 TW -722.4 44=722.1 j LCAT 8 BLOCK 7 m —x— DECK EXISTING }{OUSE )I I •_ L— _I 65.79 Z 4 E i' 0 Q 1 Block Planter Walls Dry Creek Bed w/boulders STONE STEPS ■ PLANTER WALLS and DRY CREEK BED •'-- LEVEL --3.5-�t o'P -a ;�7--C-C) ate%fib& �CP 4' WL DE STMRS->i gR{lJE4, chcq 01“HL61 JALL-i Rh55 peon Wea pue )1D01 peoH wea pue >poi 2 • Existing fencing (60" H installed 2023) New Fencing (42" High) Fence style same as existing Extend Fencing 42" High 3 A' ince 1857 Hastrngs MINNESOTA To: Heritage Preservation Commission From: Justin Fortney, City Planner Date: August 20, 2024 Item: Designated Property Notice Heritage Preservation Commission Memorandum HPC Action Requested: Review the past HPC informational post cards sent to the owners of designated properties and provide direction for the next communication. Background Information: There was some preliminary discussion last month with consensus on a postcard. Staff is looking to finalize the wording. Below is some proposed postcard wording from the brief discussion last month. Heritage Preservation Commission City of Hastings 101 4th Street East Hastings Minnesota 55033 Dear Historic Property Owner, Thank you for preserving your historic property for your community and future generations. A Certificate of Approval issued by the HPC (Hastings Heritage Preservation Commission), or staff is necessary prior to making any alterations affecting the exterior appearance of designated properties. Staff and the HPC can assist with project guidance. Low interest loans for historic properties are also available. For more information, please call Justin Fortney, City Planner at (651) 480-2381 or visit www.hastingsmn.gov Thank you for your preservation efforts! General Layout Used in the Past Historic Preservation Commission 101 4t Street East Hastings Minnesota 55033 Dear Historic Property Owner, Permits for alterations, demolitions, or moving of residential and commercial historic properties require a Certificate of Approval issued by the Hastings Historic Preservation Commission or staff. Before making any exterior improvements to your historic property --including roofing, siding, windows, doors, tuck -pointing, additions, fences, retaining walls, porches, pergolas, deck, and accessory buildings --visit the HPC website at www.hastingsmn.gov or call Justin Fortney, City Planner at (651) 480-2350 for information and assistance. Thank you for your preservation efforts! CD N 0--o ococn- co pp 1 0, P 0. 2 2 a ya �G� 0 CO GO c 155°8 Nita 4. � m E co A ' 0 tC1 r Ern ince 1857 Hastings MINNESOTA Owner's name Owner's address Hastings MN 55033 ASHLAND ST Postcard side 2