HomeMy WebLinkAboutII - MinutesHEDRA
HASTINGS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT and
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
The Hastings Economic Development and Redevelopment Authority of the City of
Hastings, Minnesota met in a regular meeting on Thursday, July 13, 2023, at
6:00p.m. at Hastings City Hall.
HEDRA Commissioners Present: Johnson, Anderson, Horsch, Fox, Goblirsch, Carter &
Pemble
HEDRA Commissioners Absent: None
Staff Present: Community Development Director, John Hinzman & Economic Development
Coordinator, Alex Menke
Quorum
A quorum was established, and the meeting was called to order by Chair Horsch
at 6:00 PM with all seven members present.
I. Minutes
Motion to approve June 15th minutes by Commissioner Carter and a second by Commissioner
Fox. None opposed and approved as presented.
II. Bills
Motion to approve bills by Commissioner Fox and a second by Commissioner Pemble. None
opposed and approved as presented.
III. Business
A. Resolution No. 2023-09 – Façade Improvement Grant Program - Busted Nut (118 2nd Street
East) – Presented by EDC Menke
a. Menke presented a summary of the request, first sharing that the City received an
application from the owners of the Busted Nut Restaurant: Tasha and Phil Nelson.
i. Request for financial assistance for exterior work on property, including pressure
washing, site prep, decorative trim replacement and exterior painting. Total is
$10,800 and with a two-to-one matching, the maximum recommended is $3600
ii. Previous resolution included a math error, which has been updated in the
current resolution
b. Commissioner Carter asks if they participated in the program last year, to which
Menke shares that they did and therefore were not eligible to be considered again
until July 1st of this year
i. Menke clarifies that they did receive funding last year, which was for
tuckpointing and brickwork
c. Having no further discussion or questions, Chair Horsch stands for a motion
i. Commissioner Goblirsch motions with a second by Commissioner Johnson
ii. None opposed and motion passes with a 7-0 vote from the commission
B. Resolution No. 2023-10 – Authorize Signature of the 3rd Amendment to Purchase
Agreement – River City Investments, LLC (Siewert Apartments) – Presented by Alex Menke
a. Menke presented a summary of the request, whereas River City Investments is in an
agreement with the city to purchase the lot, currently used as public parking, from
HEDRA for development of a 32-unit market rate apartment building located at 317
3rd Street East
b. Developer has an original purchase agreement with an end date of August 1, 2023,
but has requested a 1-year long extension to last until August 1, 2024
c. Reason for extension is that bids were not as favorable as developer had hoped and
this extension would allow the developer to rebid this project this Fall, with an intent
to begin construction in early Spring of 2024
d. Developer currently owns the lot to the west and would use both lots for this
development, totaling a ¼ of the block on the southeastern side
i. Menke states that this redevelopment would set the tone for the rest of this
block, whereas this would be the first redevelopment of this block
e. Hinzman provides further history with this property
i. HEDRA has been involved with this project since 2021, with a current 1-year
extension granted previously in 2022 that expires August 1, 2023
ii. Siewert is present tonight and can stand to share his experience with this
project and share more about the possible progression
iii. Hinzman states that this property is “impossible” for the City to develop on its
own and needs neighboring property
iv. Hinzman also states to the commission that if they are comfortable with the
extension, the City is not out anything and that there are no other developers
currently interested. Hinzman asks the Commission to reflect on viability of
this project
f. Developer Luke Siewert presents himself at the podium
i. Chair Horsch confirms that Siewert has purchased the adjoining property to
the west
ii. Siewert confirms that he purchased the property in 2017 with future plans to
develop it, has experience from his father’s work in development
iii. Siewert shares that the extension was needed because the architectural,
structural and civil planning took a substantial amount of time
g. Siewert states that they had the building permits and affairs with Excel Energy in
order to start development this upcoming Spring, but the bids came in at about 35%
higher than the initial. The lead times were too far out, so Siewert stepped back to
reassess, meeting with contractors on a weekly basis and leaning on the contractors
for when to resubmit for bidding.
i. The house on the currently owned property has been vacated since last
spring in anticipation for teardown and subsequent development of the
multifamily property
ii. The plans are all ready and has put a substantial financial commitment to
this, he needs a purchase agreement for this to be viable
h. Commissioner Anderson asks Siewert if the bidding costs are still around that 35%
i. Siewert shares that the contractors’ pricing including labor and construction
costs hasn’t come down as fast as anticipated. He has met with the Small
Business Development Center in Rochester to assist him and is trying to
determine when it is most competitive to send out, which is often fall or
winter. Siewert states that the numbers have gone down from that 35%, but it
is still not enough to offset the changes
ii. Commissioner Anderson expresses concerns that pricing will not decrease
iii. Siewert has done research and consulting to find alternate engineering
processes to save costs. Commodities has come down, but labor has
become more expensive and competitive
i. Commissioner Fox thanks Commissioner Anderson for his background. Fox also
values the investment Siewert has had in this and the potential for this is crucial for
the property next door. Commissioner Fox states that she believes moving forward
with another year extension would be reasonable given the markets and continuing
communication with Siewert
j. Commissioner Pemble is leaning towards allowing another year, begins a motion
i. Chair Horsch requests to ask another question regarding the timeline, but
Hinzman clarifies that the motion begun should have the opportunity for a
second as it was presented. Thus, Commissioner Fox seconds
ii. Siewert answers Chair Horsch’s question, stating that it would take about a
month after sending out the bids to see if the project would work. The bidding
would take a month and is unsure of how long it would be until closing.
Sitework would ideally start prior to the ground thawing then there are
designs to move Excel Energy powerlines underground
k. Commissioner Anderson asks what his plan would be if things do not work out on the
timeline
i. Siewert shares that he is very financially invested in this, so he would
probably have to start renting out the existing duplex again to offset costs
although he would have to put money into it due to vandalism
l. Chair Horsch shares that HEDRA has come down a long road with Siewert and
would prefer to keep this moving forward with this developer
m. Chair Horsch proceeds to a vote
i. All in favor, motion passes 7-0 to extend Purchase Agreement until August 1,
2024
C. Resolution No. 2023-11 – Façade Improvement Grant Program – Meyer Building (117 2nd
Street East) – Presented by Alex Menke
a. Menke presented a summary of the request, specifically requesting financial assistance for
work on the lower roof of the Meyer Building. This would consist of a full roof repair on the rear
part of the building. The applicant received funding last year, so has also had to wait until July
1st to be reviewed, but they were the last approved applicant so they did not all of the funds
requested because the funds had run out. The current eligible costs are just over $15,000, and
with the two-to-one matching, the maximum that the City can give is $5,000 for this project
b. Commissioner Johnson asks if this building is a designated Heritage Preservation site,
whereas that is the eligibility for roofs.
i. Hinzman states that is correct.
c. With no other questions or discussion, Chair Horsch opens the floor for a motion.
i. Commissioner Anderson motions and Commissioner Goblirsch seconds
ii. All in favor and the request for $5,000 towards the Meyer Building roof repairs
is approved 7-0
IV. Reports and Information
A. 2024 HEDRA Budget
a. Hinzman gives a recap for 2024 budget request
b. Staff members are putting together budgets for City Council consideration
c. HEDRA is unique because some funding comes from the City and some
comes from a special HRA Levy, which generates about $450,000
i. Block 28 project, including barbershop property, Rivertown Liquors,
etc.
1. Four properties have been acquired, thus the current fund
balance has decreased and Hinzman wants to request
allocation directly from the City for about $500,000 this year for
acquisition of additional properties
ii. Further specifics of the budget request continue for the Façade
Improvement Program ($50,000)
1. Not as many applicants this year compared to last year, so
that will be examined early next year and may need some
reallocation of those funds
iii. Revolving Loan Fund is based out of the fund balance for $120,000 of
fund that the City has on hand
1. Hinzman notes that it is good financing and good assistance
for projects, noting the importance of that for the Spiral Co-op
iv. Downtown Environmental Cleanup
1. Environmental cleanup necessary for the HEDRA owned lot
north of the Artspace Lofts, there would need to be a match
from the city to be eligible for grants
v. Future Industrial Park Planning
1. Desire to provide some funding to make determinations of
what we may be able to do
vi. Business Incubator
1. Looking at potential sites for that and how that may operate
vii. Viability of downtown alley
d. Commissioner Johnson asks if the downtown environmental cleanup is
something the City needs to start or is it pending a development plan
i. Hinzman clarifies that it would not be started without a plan because it
would not be grant eligible
ii. Commissioner Johnson asks for further clarification that this money
may not be spent within the budget year and Hinzman clarifies
e. Commissioner Johnson also asks about the utilization or percentage used of
the revolving loan funds
i. Hinzman says that it varies, but last year for Spiral it was a little over
half used
ii. Chair Horsch asks for clarification on interest rates
iii. Hinzman clarifies that it is a quarter percent over prime
f. Commissioner Pemble questions what else is to be done on the HEDRA
owned property north of the Artspace Lofts, whereas there has been an initial
cleanup
i. Hinzman states that the property was cleaned up to the qualifications
of the state 5 years ago when land was sold for ArtSpace Lofts. The
regulations have changed regarding acceptable levels for certain
contaminants
g. Commissioner Goblirsch asks Hinzman for a clarification on how this
proposed budget would compare to last year
i. Hinzman shares that everything is about the same, except for the
redevelopment capital because instead of using the fund balance,
HEDRA is asking that from the Council. Beyond that the proposed
budget is comparable
ii. Commissioner Anderson asks about current spending and remaining
budget for this year
iii. Hinzman says off the top of his head, there has been about half of the
Façade Improvement Program spent, no revolving loan funds issued
yet and other future planning items approximately 1/3 of the way
spent
h. Chair Horsch thanks Hinzman
B. Rokos Contract
a. Hinzman elaborates that last year, a contract was entered into with Rokos
Advisors to aid in marketing and finding tenants for the 50-acre property in
the industrial park. Hinzman speaks highly of the contact there, Ra’eesa
Motala
b. The contract is set to expire at the end of July and Motala is leaving Rokos,
so there is interest in contracting out Motala without Rokos. Staff will provide
a contract for the Commission’s consideration at the August meeting
c. Commissioner Carter clarifies the connection of Motala to Rokos and non-
compete
i. Hinzman clarifies that she is currently employed by Rokos, but will be
leaving soon to work on her own. Motala has reassured Hinzman that
there will not be a non-compete situation with Rokos
d. Chair Horsch asks about an update on the site
i. Hinzman says there is not much he can share at this point, but Motala
is getting it out there, which has been the difficulty of that site. 5 years
ago, efforts to put together a shovel ready site have gone unanswered
but Motala and Rokos have helped garner much more attention than
in previous years and Hinzman is hopeful for something tangible
1. Hinzman clarifies that the contract has no ongoing expenses
because it is a percentage of sale
2. Chair Horsch asks for clarification on duration and style
3. Hinzman clarifies that he hopes to continue a similar year-long
contract with the same percentage of sale payout to Motala
C. Development Updates
a. Confluence looks like it is going to open up soon!
i. No specifics on when they will be open, but most likely in coming
weeks
1. Apartments and hotel rooms completed, just finishing up those
public spaces
ii. 315 Pine Street, building damaged by fire
1. Planning Commission reviewed a Special Use Permit for a
rebuild to make the building into event center on the first floor
and rental units above
2. Plans for development in good shape, but there is just a lot of
work that needs to occur
3. Planning Commission had various discussions, including
about parking plans so that has been tabled
4. Owner has assured that demolition will be complete and it will
be covered by winter
iii. Minor Subdivision of Shepard of the Valley for possible townhome
development
iv. Spiral Boulevard and Glendale Subdivision and Plat of two
approximately 10 acre agriculture zoned properties
v. Regina Assisted Living Plans approved
vi. Dakota County Law Enforcement Addition approved
vii. Heritage Ridge Fourth Edition
1. City Council will consider 1-year long extension to recording of
their final plat of about 30 lots
2. Creative homes has seen a softening of the market, so plans
to start grading in the Spring and have lots in Summer and Fall
of next year
No further questions or discussion.
V. Adjourn
Commissioner Johnson made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 6:36 p.m., seconded by
Commissioner Carter. Motion passed 7-0. Meeting adjourned.
Next Meeting: Thursday, August 10, 2023
Respectively Submitted:
Community Development Intern, Madelyn Swanson